Introduced and Native Fishes in the Vasse- Wonnerup Wetland System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduced and Native Fishes in the Vasse- Wonnerup Wetland System Introduced and native fishes in the Vasse‐ Wonnerup Wetland System and its rivers Beatty, S.J., Tweedley, J.R., Lymbery, A.J., Keleher, J, Allen, M.G., Morgan, D.L. Freshwater Fish Group and Fish Health Unit, Murdoch University August 2014 This project was supported by funding from the Australian Government’s Caring for our Country program Citations: Beatty S.J., Tweedley, J.R., Lymbery, A.J., Keleher, J, Allen, M.G., Morgan, D.L. (2014). Introduced and native fishes in the Vasse‐Wonnerup Wetland System and its rivers. Report to the Australian Government through its Caring for our Country Program. Freshwater Fish Group and Fish Health Unit, Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia. Frontispiece: the Vasse floodgates and a large Goldfish removed from the lower Vasse River Native and Introduced Fishes of the Vasse‐Wonnerup 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 4 Fish faunas of the rivers of the Vasse‐Wonnerup Wetland System ...................................... 11 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 12 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................... 14 Sampling locations and dates .................................................................................................. 14 Habitat and environmental variables ...................................................................................... 15 Spatial and temporal distribution patterns ............................................................................. 15 Movement patterns of freshwater fishes ................................................................................ 16 Introduced species removal ..................................................................................................... 16 Fin damage by Eastern Gambusia ........................................................................................... 16 Acoustic tracking of Goldfish ................................................................................................... 18 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................ 23 Fishes and decapods in rivers of the Vasse‐Wonnerup ............................................................ 23 Spatial and temporal patterns in distribution ......................................................................... 24 Movement patterns of freshwater fishes ................................................................................ 31 Habitat and environmental variables ...................................................................................... 34 Introduced species removal ..................................................................................................... 38 Fin damage by Eastern Gambusia ........................................................................................... 40 Acoustic tracking of Goldfish ................................................................................................... 41 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 54 Fish faunas of the Vasse‐Wonnerup Wetland System ........................................................... 57 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 58 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................... 59 Sampling regime ...................................................................................................................... 59 Life cycle category and guild .................................................................................................... 62 Statistical analyses ................................................................................................................... 63 Results...................................................................................................................................... 67 Water quality ........................................................................................................................... 67 Overall number of species, density and life cycle category among regions ............................ 69 Numbers of species and density ............................................................................................... 73 Spatial changes in fish faunal composition .............................................................................. 75 Overall number of species, density and life cycle category among seasons and years ........... 89 Temporal changes in fish faunal composition ......................................................................... 93 Location of introduced fish captures ...................................................................................... 105 Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 106 Water quality ......................................................................................................................... 106 Number of species and density .............................................................................................. 109 Spatial changes in fish faunal composition ............................................................................ 111 Temporal changes in fish faunal composition ....................................................................... 114 Spatial and temporal changes the abundance and distribution of introduced fish .............. 115 Management and Monitoring Recommendations .............................................................. 118 References ............................................................................................................................. 123 Appendices ............................................................................................................................. 129 Native and Introduced Fishes of the Vasse‐Wonnerup 2 Acknowledgements The authors gratefully acknowledge the support and advice given to them throughout this study from the Vasse Wonnerup Pest Fish Steering Committee (VWPFSC), comprising: Jim Lane, Dr Kim Williams and Alan Clarke (Department of Parks and Wildlife), Dr Kath Lynch, Krish Seewraj and Jenelle Carter (Department of Water), Bruce Mackay, Michael Burgess, Claire Taylor (Department of Fisheries), Jen Mitchell (Geocatch), Dr Emily Hugues dit Ciles and Craig Bohm (South West Catchments Council) and Will Oldfield (Shire of Busselton). Sally Clifton Parks (Geocatch) is thanked for supporting the extension of this project, as are Vanessa Boladeras, James Florrison, Abbas Akbaripasand and Dr Joel Williams for their help with the fieldwork. Special thanks to the following landholders for kindly allowing access to their stretches of the various rivers: John and Janet Wells, Gary Bibby, Mark Nottle, Ross and Cheryl Manning, Peter and Donna Oates. This project was supported by the Australian Federal Government’s Caring for our Country program, GeoCatch and Murdoch University. A native Gilgie Cherax quinquecarinatus from the Abba River. Native and Introduced Fishes of the Vasse‐Wonnerup 3 Executive Summary The Vasse‐Wonnerup Ramsar Wetland System (VWWS) has international ecological significance due to its designation as a Ramsar site. However, the water quality is poor due in large part to high levels of nutrients which, in conjunction with other stressors such as regulation of flow, have caused numerous algal blooms and fish deaths. Surprisingly, there has been no quantitative research or monitoring of the fish communities in the VWWS despite fishes being key indicator group of ecosystem health and being a critical component in foodwebs and particularly for birds which give the system its Ramsar status. Although there has never been a comprehensive fish survey of the entire wetland, the adjoining rivers were known contain a number of introduced fish and crayfish species. As found elsewhere in south‐western Australia, these introduced fishes and crayfishes are known to impact directly on native fish species by predation and competition and indirectly by introducing exotic diseases. In addition, one of the key invasive species in the VWWS, Goldfish, is known to exacerbate algal blooms by re‐suspending nutrients and stimulating algal growth through their feeding processes. Other ecological impacts include alteration of natural food webs and habitat destruction through feeding and burrowing activities. The current project aimed to provide a comprehensive quantitative understanding of the fishes and crayfishes of the VWWS across the full range of habitats in order to assess the current and future health of the ecosystem and guide effective management decisions and monitoring programs. Given the impact of introduced fishes, the study had a specific simultaneous aim to document, prioritise and control introduced fishes and crayfishes to directly address a major known
Recommended publications
  • Coastal Land and Groundwater for Horticulture from Gingin to Augusta
    Research Library Resource management technical reports Natural resources research 1-1-1999 Coastal land and groundwater for horticulture from Gingin to Augusta Dennis Van Gool Werner Runge Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/rmtr Part of the Agriculture Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Soil Science Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Van Gool, D, and Runge, W. (1999), Coastal land and groundwater for horticulture from Gingin to Augusta. Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, Perth. Report 188. This report is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural resources research at Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Resource management technical reports by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. ISSN 0729-3135 May 1999 Coastal Land and Groundwater for Horticulture from Gingin to Augusta Dennis van Gool and Werner Runge Resource Management Technical Report No. 188 LAND AND GROUNDWATER FOR HORTICULTURE Information for Readers and Contributors Scientists who wish to publish the results of their investigations have access to a large number of journals. However, for a variety of reasons the editors of most of these journals are unwilling to accept articles that are lengthy or contain information that is preliminary in nature. Nevertheless, much material of this type is of interest and value to other scientists, administrators or planners and should be published. The Resource Management Technical Report series is an avenue for the dissemination of preliminary or lengthy material relevant the management of natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Statewide Recreational Fishing Survey
    Fisheries Queensland Queensland Fisheries Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Forestry Fisheries and Agriculture, Department of Department 2010 Statewide Recreational Fishing Survey Stephen Taylor, James Webley, Kirrily McInnes © State of Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, 2012. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek permission from DAFF, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland, Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en 2010 Statewide Recreational Fishing Survey ii Content Acknowledgements iv List of tables v List of figures vi Glossary viii Executive summary x Introduction 1 Recreational fishing: benefits and impacts 1 Need for recreational fishing information 1 Aims and objectives 2 Comparison with previous surveys 2 Relevance to assessment of fish stocks and sustainability assessments 2 Relevance to management and industry development 3 Report structure 3 Materials and methods 4 Statewide recreational fishing survey 4 Comparison with the NRIFS 2000–2001 11 Stakeholder consultation 11 Testing the representativeness of the sample 12 Results 13 Sample and response profiles 13 Demographics of fishers 14 Household boat ownership 16 Inter-annual fishing frequency 22 Recreational fishing effort 23 Recreational catch 30 Comparing 2000 with 2010 59 Testing the representativeness of the sample 65 Discussion 67 Participation in recreational fishing in Queensland 67 Recreational catch and effort 67 Quality of the results 68 Conclusion and recommendations 70 References 71 Appendix 73 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of Terengganu East Coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia Ii Iii
    i Fishes of Terengganu East coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia ii iii Edited by Mizuki Matsunuma, Hiroyuki Motomura, Keiichi Matsuura, Noor Azhar M. Shazili and Mohd Azmi Ambak Photographed by Masatoshi Meguro and Mizuki Matsunuma iv Copy Right © 2011 by the National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the publisher. Copyrights of the specimen photographs are held by the Kagoshima Uni- versity Museum. For bibliographic purposes this book should be cited as follows: Matsunuma, M., H. Motomura, K. Matsuura, N. A. M. Shazili and M. A. Ambak (eds.). 2011 (Nov.). Fishes of Terengganu – east coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia. National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum, ix + 251 pages. ISBN 978-4-87803-036-9 Corresponding editor: Hiroyuki Motomura (e-mail: [email protected]) v Preface Tropical seas in Southeast Asian countries are well known for their rich fish diversity found in various environments such as beautiful coral reefs, mud flats, sandy beaches, mangroves, and estuaries around river mouths. The South China Sea is a major water body containing a large and diverse fish fauna. However, many areas of the South China Sea, particularly in Malaysia and Vietnam, have been poorly studied in terms of fish taxonomy and diversity. Local fish scientists and students have frequently faced difficulty when try- ing to identify fishes in their home countries. During the International Training Program of the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (ITP of JSPS), two graduate students of Kagoshima University, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ludlow Titanium Minerals Mine, 34 Kilometres South of Bunbury
    Ludlow Titanium Minerals Mine, 34 Kilometres South of Bunbury Cable Sands (WA) Pty Ltd Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority Environmental Protection Authority Perth, Western Australia Bulletin 1098 May 2003 ISBN. 0 7307 6734 5 ISSN. 1030 - 0120 Assessment No. 1385 Summary and recommendations Cable Sands (WA) Pty Ltd proposes to develop a mineral sands mine in a section of State Forest No.2, near Ludlow. This report provides the Environmental Protection Authority’s (EPA’s) advice and recommendations to the Minister for the Environment and Heritage on the environmental factors relevant to the proposal. Section 44 of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 requires the EPA to report to the Minister for the Environment and Heritage on the environmental factors relevant to the proposal and on the conditions and procedures to which the proposal should be subject, if implemented. In addition, the EPA may make recommendations as it sees fit. Relevant environmental factors The EPA decided that the following environmental factors relevant to the proposal required detailed evaluation in this report: (a) Tuart conservation; (b) Rehabilitation; and (c) Fauna. There were a number of other factors which were relevant to the proposal, but the EPA is of the view that the information set out in Appendix 3 provides sufficient evaluation. Conclusion The EPA has considered the proposal by Cable Sands (WA) Pty Ltd to develop a mineral sands mine in a section of State Forest No.2, 34 km south of Bunbury. Cable Sands (WA) Pty Ltd has worked hard with the community and government to develop an environmentally acceptable proposal in a region which has high significance for conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Condamine Region
    Upper Talking fish Making connections with the rivers of the Murray-Darling Basin Authors ZaferSarac,HamishSewell,GregRingwood,LizBakerandScottNichols The rivers of the Murray-Darling River Basin Citation:Sarac,Z.,Sewell,H.,Ringwood,G.Baker,E.andNichols,S.(2012)Upper TheriversandcreeksoftheMurrayͲDarlingBasinflowthroughQueensland,NewSouth Condamine:TalkingfishͲmakingconnectionswiththeriversoftheMurrayͲ Wales,theAustralianCapitalTerritory,VictoriaandSouthAustralia.The77000kmof DarlingBasin,MurrayͲDarlingBasinAuthority,Canberra. waterwaysthatmakeuptheBasinlink23catchmentsoveranareaof1millionkm2. Projectsteeringcommittee TerryKorodaj(MDBA),CameronLay(NSWDPI),ZaferSarac(QldDEEDI),Adrian Eachriverhasitsowncharacteryetthesewaters,thefish,theplants,andthepeoplethat Wells(MDBACommunityStakeholderTaskforce),PeterJackson(MDBANative relyonthemarealldifferent. FishStrategyadvisor),FernHames(VicDSE)andJonathanMcPhail(PIRSA). Thebookletsinthisseriestellthestoriesofhowtherivers,fishandfishinghavechanged. ProjectTeam ScottNichols,CameronLay,CraigCopeland,LizBaker(NSWDPI);JodiFrawley, Themainstoriesinthesebookletsarewrittenfromoralhistoryinterviewsconductedwith HeatherGoodall(UTS);ZaferSarac,GregRingwood(QldDEEDI);HamishSewell localfishersin2010Ͳ11,andrelateindividuals’memoriesofhowtheirlocalplaceshave (TheStoryProject);PhilDuncan(NgnuluConsulting);TerryKorodaj(MDBA); changed.ThesebookletsshowcasethreewaysofknowingtheCondamineRiver:personal FernHames,PamClunie,SteveSaddlier(VicDSE);JonathanMcPhail, VirginiaSimpson(PIRSA);WillTrueman(researcher).
    [Show full text]
  • River Action Plan for the Sabina, Abba and Ludlow Rivers Vol 1. 2002
    River Action Plan for the Sabina, Abba and Ludlow Rivers Volume 1. Maps and Recommendations for Sabina River and Woddidup Creek 2002 Soil and Land Conservation Natural Heritage Trust Council Western Australia GeoCatch River Action Plan for the Sabina, Abba and Ludlow Rivers Volume 1. Maps and Recommendations for Sabina River and Woddidup Creek 2002 Prepared for the Geographe Catchment Council - GeoCatch and the Vasse-Wonnerup Land Conservation District Committee by Genevieve Hanran-Smith Funded by the Natural Heritage Trust and the Water and Rivers Commission ISBN: 0-7309-7590-8 This report was prepared for GeoCatch, the Vasse-Wonnerup LCDC and landholders in the catchments of the Sabina, Abba and Ludlow Rivers. Sections 1 and 2 provide background information on the river action plan and the study area. Section 3 details the methodology used in assessing the condition of the rivers. Sections 4 and 5 outline the management issues identified and provide general management advice. Maps showing foreshore condition rating, fencing status, river features, management issues and weeds are included in Section 6 with specific management advice for each section of river. There are three volumes of this report. One for the Sabina River and Woddidup Creek, one for the Abba River, and one for the Ludlow River and Tiger Gully. Sections 1 to 5 are the same in all the reports. Section 6 differs in each volume and contains maps and specific management advice for each of the river systems. Figure 11 uses colour codes to show the foreshore conditions of the whole river system. It also provides an index to assist with locating specific sections of river.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Drainage Networks Vasse Taskforce | May 2015 |
    Government of Western Australia Department of Water Factsheet: 3 Rural drainage networks Vasse Taskforce | May 2015 | Major drainage works in the Geographe Catchment commenced in the 1880s when the Capel River was diverted away from the Wonnerup Estuary into Geographe Bay through the Higgins cut. Over the past 100 years drainage works including the construction of surge barriers on the Vasse and Wonnerup estuaries, a network of small drains to remove water from farmland, river diversions and a series of large arterial drains, including the Vasse diversion drain, were undertaken. This has significantly altered the hydrology of the catchment. The drainage system enabled farming on the coastal plain that was previously inundated during winter and protected the growing town of Busselton from flooding. The combined effect of catchment clearing and major drainage works, however, also substantially reduced the capacity of the catchment to retain sediment and nutrients, greatly increasing nutrients and organic matter entering catchment waterways and Geographe Bay. The Water Corporation is the lead asset manager for the rural drainage network and will work closely with the Department of Water, which will lead the implementation of projects to improve water quality in catchment waterways through improved management of the rural drainage network. Key initiatives include: • new catchment water, flood and landform model • feasibility study into reconnecting rivers • drainage management plan Project Spotlight New catchment water, flood and landform model A range of options for improving water quality in waterways in the Geographe catchment has been raised over a number of years. This project will develop a whole of catchment water model and develop an estuarine model for the Vasse estuary to assess the feasibility of these and new innovative options for changing water flow in the catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Freshwater Fish in the South-Western Corner of Australia
    The Distribution of Freshwater Fish in the South-Western Corner of Australia Report to Water and Rivers Commission David Morgan, Howard Gill & Ian Potter _;: ':1 Fish Research Group I ' ,, School of Biological imd Environmenta!~Ciences Murdoch University,,..,• ~ · Water and,:Rivers C~mmission Policy a!)li Planning Division / WATER REsOURCE TECHNICAL SERIES WATER AND RIVERS COMMISSION REPORT WRT4 1996 WATER AND RIVERS COMMISSION © Water and Rivers Commission of Western Australia, 1996 Published by the Water and Rivers Commission Hyatt Centre 3 Plain Street East Perth, Western Australia 6004 Telephone: (09) 278 0300 Publication Number: WRT4 ISBN 0-7309-7250-X STREAMLINE ABSTRACT This study investigates the distribution of freshwater fishes in the Busselton to Walpole Region. A total of 311 sites in 19 major catchments along the south-west coast from Capel to Walpole, were sampled using a variety of methods. New data was collated with that from previous studies to generate 15 species distribution maps. Habitat and life history notes and recommendations for conservation are made for each species. Changes in fish distribution are also commented upon. This study contributes to series of documents published for the purposes of water allocation planning in the Busselton to Walpole Region. Other publications focus on the following topics: • Recreational Use on Waterbodies in the Busselton- Walpole Region • Report on an Investigation into the Aboriginal Significance of Wetlands and Rivers in the Busselton-Walpole Region. • Enviromnental Significance of Wetlands and Rivers in the Busselton- Walpole Region • Historical Association of Wetlands and Rivers in the Busselton- Walpole Region. • Divertible Water Resources Key Words Water Resources Planning, Freshwater Fish Distribution, Wetland and Rivers, Busselton to Walpole, Western Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2014 Version
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2014 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/doc/ris/key_ris_e.doc and http://www.ramsar.org/pdf/ris/key_ris_e.pdf Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. Western Australian Department of Conservation and Land DD MM YY Management (DCLM; now Department of Parks and Wildlife) in 1990. Updated by Roger Jaensch, Wetlands International – Oceania, on behalf of DCLM, in 1998, and by DCLM in 2000 and 2003. Updated by Wetland Research & Management on Designation date Site Reference Number behalf of Department of Environment and Conservation (now Department of Parks and Wildlife) in August 2007. Updated by Department of Parks and Wildlife in 2014. All inquiries should be directed to: Department of Parks and Wildlife Principal Coordinator, Wetlands Section 17 Dick Perry Avenue Kensington, WA, 6151 Australia Tel: +61-8-9219 9000 Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: July 2014 3. Country: Australia 4. Name of the Ramsar site: The precise name of the designated site in one of the three official languages (English, French or Spanish) of the Convention. Alternative names, including in local language(s), should be given in parentheses after the precise name. Vasse-Wonnerup System. 5. Designation of new Ramsar site or update of existing site: The Vasse-Wonnerup System Ramsar site was designated on 7 June 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5 Baseline Aquatic Biology and Water Quality Study
    Cloverdale Project M-CV-00028 Baseline Aquatic Biology and Water Quality Study including Tiger Gully, Ludlow River and Capel River prepared for by Wetland Research & Management Cloverdale Project M-CV-00028 Baseline Aquatic Biology and Water Quality Study including Tiger Gully, Ludlow River and Capel River Prepared for: Iluka Resources Limited Level 23, 140 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000 GPO Box U1988 Perth WA Ph (61 8) 9360 4700 By: Wetland Research & Management 28 William Street, Glen Forrest, WA 6071, Australia Ph (61 8) 9298 9807, Fax (61 8) 9380 1029, e-mail: awstorey@ cyllene.uwa.edu.au Draft Report April 2006 Frontispiece: (clockwise from main picture) Ludlow River, 1.2 km downstream from the Cloverdale project area; male koonac Cherax plebejus; nightfish Bostockia porosa. ii Study Team 8anagement: Sue Creagh Field Work: Sue Creagh & Jess Lynas Macroinvertebrate Identification: Lisa Chandler & Sue Creagh Data analysis: Sue Creagh & Andrew Storey Report: Sue Creagh Acknowledgements This project was undertaken by Wetland Research & Management (WRM) for Iluka Resources Limited. WRM would like to acknowledge Dr Don Edward (UWA) for assistance with Chironomidae taxonomy and Dr Mark Harvey (WAM) for Acarina taxonomy and Dr Rob Davis (Western Wildlife) for tadpole identifications. The maps of the study area were provided by Iluka Resources Limited. Shannon Jones (Iluka) is thanked for constructive criticism on the draft report and for her efficient overall management of this project on behalf of Iluka. The authors are grateful to Craig and Tom Hutton, Garry Bibby, Jan McKechnie and to the Norton, Armstrong, Weir and Whiteland families, who readily granted access to their pastoral properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Iluka Resources Ltd. Cloverdale Project
    Iluka Resources Ltd. Cloverdale Project Vegetation, Flora and Fauna Investigations Report April 2005 Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Scope of Work 1 2. Existing Environment – Desktop Assessment 3 2.1 Wetlands 3 2.2 Vegetation 3 2.3 Regional Significance of the Vegetation 5 2.4 Threatened Ecological Communities 5 2.5 Flora 6 2.6 Fauna 13 3. Results of Field Survey 18 3.1 Vegetation 18 3.2 Threatened Ecological Communities 21 3.3 Flora 21 3.4 Fauna 23 3.5 Fauna Habitat Assessment 24 4. Summary 25 5. References 26 Table Index Table 1 Vegetation Communities intersected by the Cloverdale Project. 4 Table 2 Threatened Ecological Communities found in the general Capel area 6 Table 3 Declared Rare and Priority Flora known from general Capel area 7 Table 4 Conservation Codes and Descriptions for CALM Declared Rare and Priority Flora Species. 12 Table 5 Listing of Potentially Occurring Significant, Rare and Priority Fauna Species – Cloverdale Prospect 17 Table 6 Vegetation Community Description and Condition Rating, Cloverdale Prospect Area 19 61/15996/49839 Cloverdale Project Vegetation, Flora and Fauna Investigations Table 7 Flora List per Site examined, Cloverdale Prospect 28 Table 8 List of Observed Fauna, Cloverdale Prospect 37 Figure Index Figure 1: Cloverdale Prospect Location Plan 2 Appendices A Flora List B Fauna List C Maps 61/15996/49839 Cloverdale Project Vegetation, Flora and Fauna Investigations 1. Introduction 1.1 Background Iluka Resources proposes to establish a mineral sands mine in the Tutunup area, called the Cloverdale Mineral Sands Project. The Cloverdale Project Area is sited approximately 8 kilometres south of Capel and 20 km east of Busselton, in the Shires of Busselton and Capel.
    [Show full text]
  • Recycled Fish Sculpture (.PDF)
    Recycled Fish Sculpture Name:__________ Fish: are a paraphyletic group of organisms that consist of all gill-bearing aquatic vertebrate animals that lack limbs with digits. At 32,000 species, fish exhibit greater species diversity than any other group of vertebrates. Sculpture: is three-dimensional artwork created by shaping or combining hard materials—typically stone such as marble—or metal, glass, or wood. Softer ("plastic") materials can also be used, such as clay, textiles, plastics, polymers and softer metals. They may be assembled such as by welding or gluing or by firing, molded or cast. Researched Photo Source: Alaskan Rainbow STEP ONE: CHOOSE one fish from the attached Fish Names list. Trout STEP TWO: RESEARCH on-line and complete the attached K/U Fish Research Sheet. STEP THREE: DRAW 3 conceptual sketches with colour pencil crayons of possible visual images that represent your researched fish. STEP FOUR: Once your fish designs are approved by the teacher, DRAW a representational outline of your fish on the 18 x24 and then add VALUE and COLOUR . CONSIDER: Individual shapes and forms for the various parts you will cut out of recycled pop aluminum cans (such as individual scales, gills, fins etc.) STEP FIVE: CUT OUT using scissors the various individual sections of your chosen fish from recycled pop aluminum cans. OVERLAY them on top of your 18 x 24 Representational Outline 18 x 24 Drawing representational drawing to judge the shape and size of each piece. STEP SIX: Once you have cut out all your shapes and forms, GLUE the various pieces together with a glue gun.
    [Show full text]