Pastoral Mobility and the Formation of Complex Settlement in the Middle Bronze Age Şərur Valley, Azerbaijan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pastoral Mobility and the Formation of Complex Settlement in the Middle Bronze Age Şərur Valley, Azerbaijan Pastoral Mobility and the Formation of Complex Settlement in the Middle Bronze Age Şərur Valley, Azerbaijan Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Selin Elizabeth Nugent, B.A., B.Sc., M.A. Graduate Program in Anthropology The Ohio State University 2017 Dissertation Committee: Professor Clark Spencer Larsen, Advisor Professor Robert Cook Professor Hilary Gopnik Professor Mark Hubbe Professor Joy McCorriston . Copyright by Selin Elizabeth Nugent 2017 . ABSTRACT What degree of authority do mobile pastoralists demonstrate during the emergence of complex settlement systems? Archaeology has historically marginalized mobile populations or ignored their contribution to the development of social complexity. This research employs isotopic analyses on human skeletal remains in context with mortuary practice to explain how mobile pastoralists integrated into the emerging urban centers of the Middle Bronze Age (2400-1500BC) South Caucasus in the Şǝrur Valley of Naxçıvan, Azerbaijan. Small, fragmentary groups of mobile pastoralists and trace evidence of small- scale settlements characterize the Middle Bronze Age (2400-1500BC) in the South Caucasus (Smith, 2005a). However, at the Qızqala settlement complex in the Aras River Valley of Naxçıvan, Azerbaijan, the Middle Bronze Age features major political transformations and dense settlements on a scale that precedes traditional chronologies of the emergence of complex settlements in the Late Bronze Age (1500-1150 B.C) (Ristvet et al., 2012; Smith, 2012). Unlike most emergent Near Eastern urban societies, where the development of states and urban centers was predicated on control of agricultural production and sedentism, this region presents a case where the development of sociopolitical complexity relied on a regional population hypothesized as depending primarily on mobile pastoral subsistence (Smith, 2003). While the lack of long-term settlement across most the region supports seasonal and recurrent mobility patterns ii during the Middle Bronze Age, little is known about the specific modes of mobile subsistence in the earliest fortified complex settlements and how mobility functioned in emergent complex settlement contexts. How the administrative system of the fortress and these mobile populations negotiated space and power is thus a key consideration in unraveling the development of polities in the South Caucasus and expanding on traditional models of social complexity (Arbuckle, 2012; Frachetti, 2012; Honeychurch, 2014; McCorriston, 2013; Porter, 2012; Szuchman, 2009). How do pastoralists engage in mobility in emerging polities? How did changing mortuary practices generate and/or reflect negotiations of mobile people in a new political landscape? This dissertation tests the hypotheses of seasonal highland mobility and dynamic negotiations between mobile and sedentary factions at the Qızqala cemetery to investigate how mobile pastoral mobility, mortuary space construction and funerary ritual changed in this region during the emergence of complex polities. Strontium (87Sr/86Sr), oxygen (δ18O), and carbon (δ13C) isotopic analyses on sequentially sampled human dental enamel provide data on seasonal diet and water sourcing behaviors over dental development to track degree of individual mobility across the regional landscape and shifting dietary habits. The heterogeneity in intra-individual and intra-tooth isotopic values for all isotopes studies supports the hypothesized intensive pastoral mobility that characterizes the Middle Bronze Age populations of the South Caucasus. Results reveal a range of residential and seasonal mobility patterns, which support that the Qızqala population continued reliance on nomadic lifeways even during the emergence of complex settlement. Most individuals fluctuate between lowland and iii highland zones, which correspond to periods of increased C4 millet consumption, a highland summer crop. This dissertation examines how individual mobility behaviors relate to local and individual expressions of funerary ritual in order to reflect on how pastoralist communities shaped their political landscape through reproducing, transforming, and/or resisting political and economic conditions of power through manipulations of funerary objects and spaces. The location, orientation, style, and elaboration of each individual’s burial context provide data to examine distribution of economic resources available to mobile pastoralists in emerging complex settlement systems. Results suggest mobility patterns closely relate to placement in the cemetery, supporting the importance of mobility in maintaining social cohesion around elite individuals. By taking a bioarchaeological approach that includes details from the human skeleton as well as mortuary archaeology, this dissertation offers an encompassing perspective on interactions between mobile pastoralists and political institutions, elucidating the subject’s perspective on mobility and power that has otherwise been overlooked. iv DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my parents, James and Güliz Nugent, for their continuous support of my education and for instilling a life-long love for my heritage. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation was made possible with the support of a number of scholars, mentors, colleagues, and friends. I would first like to extend my appreciation to my advisor Clark Spencer Larsen for his guidance throughout my graduate career. I am also grateful for the contributions of my committee members, Mark Hubbe, Rob Cooke, and Joy McCorriston, who offered guidance and a critical eye from the inception of this project through its completion. This project would not be possible without the hospitality and generosity of the directors of the Naxçıvan Archaeological Project, Hilary Gopnik, Emily Hammer, and Lauren Ristvet. I am eternally grateful that they took a chance on a wide-eyed undergraduate with no camping experience and introduced me to rural Naxçıvan. Special thanks to my Azerbaijani collaborators, Veli Bakhshaliyev and Bəhlul Ibrahimli who supported my project through access to archaeological materials, offering their deep knowledge of the local environment and history, and by so kindly welcoming and hosting me in Naxçıvan. Veli Müellim ve Bəhlul Müellim sizin qonaqpərvərliyə və Naxçıvanda mənim tədqiqat yardım üçün çox təşəkkür edirəm. Isotopic analysis was significantly improved by the support and insights of Kelly Knudson, and Gwyn Gordon at Arizona State University as well as David Dettman at the University of Arizona. I am appreciative of their generosity in allowing me to use their lab space and equipment as well as for discussions that vastly improved my research. vi Many thanks also to Allisen Dahlstedt for opening her home, taking time out of her busy schedule to train me, and for her friendship during my stay in Tempe. Financial support of this project was provided by a number of organizations. International travel to Azerbaijan was made possible by the Wenner-Gren Foundation Dissertation Fieldwork Grant, the American Schools for Oriental Research Heritage Fellowship, and The Ohio State University Larsen Travel Award. Sample preparation and analysis were supported by the Wenner-Gren Foundation Dissertation Fieldwork Grant and the National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant (BSC 1545697). I am also thankful for the friends who supported and inspired me over the course of planning, development, research, and writing this dissertation. Thank you to Susannah Fishman, Kellen Hope, Robert Bryant, Hannah Lau, Jen Swerida, Lucas Proctor, Sara McGuire, Abby Buffington, Kathryn Marklein, and Katie Downey. Most of all, thank you to my family, Phillip Grudzina, Hermes, and Lisa for the consistent emotional support and understanding during my many months spent abroad as well as those spent glued to a computer screen. vii VITA 2008………………………………………Northview High School, Duluth, GA 2012………………………………………B.Sc. Anthropology & Human Biology, Emory University 2012………………………………………B.A. Ancient Mediterranean Studies, Emory University 2013………………………………………M.A. Anthropology, The Ohio State University 2013-2014………………………………...Graduate Teaching Associate, Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University 2014-2015………………………………...Graduate Research Associate, Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University 2015-2017………………………………...Graduate Research Assistant, NORC, University of Chicago Fields of Study Major Field: Anthropology Concentration: Biological Anthropology Publications Grimstead, D., Nugent, S. 2017. “Why a Standardization of Strontium Isotope Baseline Environmental Data are Needed and Recommendations for Methodology.” Advances in Archaeological Science 5 (2): 184-195. Baxşəliyev, V., Ristvet, L., Gopnik, H., Nugent, S, Swerida, J. 2016. “Qızqalası Yaşayış Yerində 2015-ci Ildə Aparılan Arxeoloji Araşdırmalar (trans. Archaeological Investigations at the Qızqala Settlement Site, 2015). Azərbaycan MEA-nın viii Xəbərləri. Ictimai elmlər seriyası 2: 178-198. Nugent, S. 2016 “Qızqala Kurganları ve Gömme Gelenekleri (trans. Kurgan Burials and Mortuary Practice at Qızqala).” Naxçıvan qalaları: tarixdə və günümüzdə. Editor: Ismayilova, N. McManus, D. and Nugent, S. 2011. "Blacking Plato’s Eye: Shadows, Puppets, Clowns, and Tragic Comedy." Journal of Drama Studies 5(1): 5-20. Haddow, SD, Sadvari, JW, Knüsel, CJ, Moore SV, Larsen, CS, Nugent, SN. (in press) “Out of Range? Non-normative
Recommended publications
  • THE ARCHEOLOGY of DEATH ANG 6191 (Section 4G20) ANT 4930 (Section 4G21) Fall 2020
    THE ARCHEOLOGY OF DEATH ANG 6191 (section 4G20) ANT 4930 (Section 4G21) Fall 2020 Instructor: Dr. James M. Davidson Course Level/Structure: seminar Time: Tuesdays -- periods 6 through 8 (12:50 – 3:50 pm) Classroom: none (online) Office: Turlington B134 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: by appointment Website for readings: Canvas Course Description and Objectives: The seminar’s goal is to provide a solid grounding in the anthropological literature of Mortuary studies; that is, data derived from a study of the Death experience. In addition to archaeological data, a strong emphasis will be placed on the theoretical underpinnings of mortuary data, drawn from cultural anthropology and ethnography. Along with more theoretical papers, specific case studies will be used to address a variety of topics and issues, such as Social Organization, Spirituality and Religion, Skeletal Biology (e.g., Paleodemography, Paleopathology, and other issues of Bioarchaeology), Gender Issues, the Ethics of using Human Remains, and Post-Processual Critiques. The time range that we will cover in the course will span from the Neolithic to the 20th century, and numerous cultures from all parts of the globe will be our subject matter. Course Requirements: Class participation/attendance 5% Leading Class Discussion: 5% Synopses (of specific readings) 20% Two essay/reaction papers 20% Major research paper 50% Texts: 1). Chapman, Robert (editor) 1981 The Archaeology of Death. Cambridge University Press. 2). Parker Pearson, Mike 1999 The Archaeology of Death and Burial. Texas A&M University Press. 3). The primary texts will be derived from individual readings (e.g., articles, book chapters) (see website) 1 Attendance: Regular attendance and participation in class discussions is a requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Quarter 2018 Class Schedule
    FALL QUARTER 2018 CLASS SCHEDULE COURSE NUMBER COURSE TITLE SPECIAL TOPIC (IF APPLICABLE) INSTRUCTOR Core Course Archaeology M201A Graduate Core Seminar Monica Smith Archaeology C220 Archaeology of Death John Papadopoulos Anthropology 219 Selected Topics in Anthropological/Archaeological Theory Issues in Indigenous Archaeology Stephen Acabado Ancient Near East 260 Seminar: Ancient Near Eastern Archaeology Elizabeth Carter Ancient Near East 261 Practical Field Archaeology Archaeological Fieldwork (Ethiopia) Willeke Wendrich Graduate Art and Architecture of Ancient Egypt, Predynastic Period to Ancient Near East C267A Kara Cooney Seminars New Kingdom Art History C216A Middle Byzantine Art & Architecture Sharon Gerstel Art History C248A Art and Material Culture, Neolithic to 210 B.C. Art & Material Culture of Early China Lothar von Falkenhausen Art History C249A Selected Topics in Chinese Art Lothar von Falkenhausen Classics 245 Computing and Classics Chris Johanson Classics 250 Topics in Greek and Roman Culture and Literature Women's History Amy Richlin Archaeology M205A Selected Laboratory Topics in Archaeology Experimental Archaeology Tom Wake Conservation M210L Cultural Materials Science Laboratory: Technical Study Ioanna Kakoulli Conservation 231 Conservation Laboratory: Stone and Adobe Christian Fischer Conservation 238 Conservation Laboratory: Organic Materials II Ellen Pearlstein Lab Courses Conservation Laboratory: Rock Art, Wall Paintings, and Conservation M250 Ioanna Kakoulli Mosaics Structure, Properties, and Deterioration of
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Correlating Biological
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Correlating Biological Relationships, Social Inequality, and Population Movement among Prehistoric California Foragers: Ancient Human DNA Analysis from CA-SCL-38 (Yukisma Site). A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Cara Rachelle Monroe Committee in charge: Professor Michael A. Jochim, Chair Professor Lynn Gamble Professor Michael Glassow Adjunct Professor John R. Johnson September 2014 The dissertation of Cara Rachelle Monroe is approved. ____________________________________________ Lynn H. Gamble ____________________________________________ Michael A. Glassow ____________________________________________ John R. Johnson ____________________________________________ Michael A. Jochim, Committee Chair September 2014 Correlating Biological Relationships, Social Inequality, and Population Movement among Prehistoric California Foragers: Ancient Human DNA Analysis from CA-SCL-38 (Yukisma Site). Copyright © 2014 by Cara Rahelle Monroe iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Completing this dissertation has been an intellectual journey filled with difficulties, but ultimately rewarding in unexpected ways. I am leaving graduate school, albeit later than expected, as a more dedicated and experienced scientist who has adopted a four field anthropological research approach. This was not only the result of the mentorships and the education I received from the University of California-Santa Barbara’s Anthropology department, but also from friends
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and the Ancient World 1
    Archaeology and the Ancient World 1 ARCH 0100 Field Archaeology in the Ancient World Archaeology and the or a course that addresses similar methodological/scientific topics, which must be approved by the concentration advisor. Appropriate courses could include, for example: Ancient World ARCH 1900 The Archaeology of College Hill ANTH 0500 Past Forward: Discovering Anthropological The concentration in Archaeology and the Ancient World provides an Archaeology opportunity to explore the multi-faceted discipline of archaeology while One introductory course in ancient art history, preferably: 1 examining the critical early civilizations of the so-called ‘Old World’– that ARCH 0030 Art in Antiquity: An Introduction is, the complex societies of the Mediterranean, Egypt, and the Near East. Students will learn about the art, architecture, and material culture of the or an ancient art history course approved by the concentration ancient world, exploring things of beauty and power, as well as the world advisor. Appropriate courses could include, for example: of the everyday. Concentrators will also learn "how to do" archaeology ARCH 0150 Introduction to Egyptian Archaeology and - the techniques of locating, retrieving, and analyzing ancient remains - Art and consider how material culture shapes our understanding of the past. ARCH 0520 Roman Archaeology and Art Concentrators are encouraged to pursue research opportunities through One introductory ARCH course in Egyptian or Near Eastern 1 summer fieldwork, museum experience, or independent study projects. archaeology, art, and/or architecture, for example: The undergraduate concentration in Archaeology and the Ancient ARCH 0152 Egyptomania: Mystery of the Sphinx and World provides students with an opportunity to explore the multi- Other Secrets of Ancient Egypt faceted discipline of archaeology, and encourages an interdisciplinary ARCH 0360 East Meets West: Archaeology of Anatolia approach to engaging with the ancient world.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Brenda J. Baker
    CURRICULUM VITAE BRENDA J. BAKER Associate Professor of Anthropology Center for Bioarchaeological Research School of Human Evolution & Social Change Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-2402 Phone: (480) 965-2087; Fax: (480) 965-7671; E-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION 1992 Ph.D. in Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Dissertation: Collagen Composition in Human Skeletal Remains from the NAX Cemetery (A.D. 350-550) in Lower Nubia. Doctoral committee chair: Dr. George J. Armelagos 1983 M.A. in Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. 1981 B.A. in Anthropology, with Honors, Northwestern University Honors thesis: A Bioarchaeological Analysis of N155-2: A Prehistoric Mortuary Structure from Nauvoo, lllinois. Advisor: Dr. Jane E. Buikstra PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS 2002-present Associate Professor, School of Human Evolution & Social Change (Department of Anthropology prior to 2005), Arizona State University. 1998-2002 Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University. 1994-1998 Senior Scientist (Bioarchaeology), Curator of Human Osteology and Director of Repatriation Program, Anthropological Survey, New York State Museum, Albany, NY. Developed research program concerning human skeletal remains in the museum's collections and in New York State; consulted on identification of human remains for other agencies (e.g., State Police); supervised staff and student interns in inventory work for the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA); oversaw budget and grants for NAGPRA and research projects; served on museum exhibit planning and collections committee; participated in public programming. 1995-1998 Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, SUNY. 1993-1994 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Moorhead State University, MN.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeoastronomy in the Ancient Americas
    Journal of Archaeological Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, June 2003 ((CC 2003) Archaeoastronomy in the Ancient Americas Anthony F. Aveni11 Since its popular resurgence in the 1960s, the interdisciplinary field of archaeoas- tronomy, which seeks evidence from the written as well as the unwritten record to shed light on the nature and practice of astronomy and timekeeping in ancient civ- ilizations, has made ever-increasing significant use of the ararchaeological record.d. Thiss esessaybrieflytouchesesontheoriginandd historyy ofofthesesedevelopments,, discussess the methodology of archaeoastronomy, and assesses its contributions via the dis- cussssioionn ofof seselelectcted casese ststudieiess atat sisitetess inin Nortrth,h, Soututh,h, andd Mesosoamerericica.a. Spececifiifi-- cally, archaeology contributes significantly to clarifying the role of sky events in site planning. The rigorous repetition of axial alignments of sites and individual oddly shaped and/or oriented structures can be related to alterations in the calen- darr often initiated by crcrososs-cultururalal contact. TTogetherer withh evevidencee acquirired frfrom other forms of the ancient record, archaeology also helps clarify the relationship between functional and symbolic astronomical knowledge. In state-level societies, it offers graphic evidence that structures that served as chronographic markers also functioned as performative stages for seasonally timed rituals mandated by cosmic connections claimed by the rulership. KEY WORDS: archaeoastronomy; archaeology; architecture; orientation (alignment). HISTORICAL AND THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE Mostst ancicientt cicivivililizazatitionss paidid sosome atattetentntioionn toto whatat goeses on inin ththee skskyy.. Thee periodic cycles of the sun, moon, and planets are the most pristine, predictable, and consequently, the most reliable natural phenomena on which to anchor the counting of the days and the making of the calendar.
    [Show full text]
  • Thoughts on a Method for Zooarchaeological Study of Quotidian Life
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert Interpreting household practices Barcelona, 21-24 november 2007 Treballs d’Arqueologia 13 (2007): 5-27 THOUGHTS ON A METHOD FOR ZOOARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY OF QUOTIDIAN LIFE Diane Gifford-Gonzalez Abstract: The emerging focus on the structures and practices everyday life in archaeology allows us to envision the full range of occupations, activities, and actors involved in social and ecological maintenance and reproduction. Despite this, archaeological interpretation still tends to be framed in terms of grand narratives, in which the "story" is about the agency of large-scale processes as they play out in human existence. This paper offers some comments on these problems from the perspective of a zooarchaeologist analysis, exploring more deeply the articulation of mid- dle-range archaeological theory to practice theory. Resumen: El creciente interés de la arqueología en las estructuras y prác- ticas cotidianas permite contemplar la amplia gama de ocupaciones, actividades y actores que participan del mantenimiento y reproducción social y ecológico. A pesar de ésto, las interpretaciones arqueológicas siguen tendiendo a estructurarse en términos de las grandes narrativas, en las cuales la narración prima los procesos a largo plazo sobre la exis- tencia humana. En este artículo se comentan estos problemas desde una perspectiva zooarqueológica, explorando con mayor profundidad la articulación de la teoría arqueológica de rango medio con la teoría de la práctica y con otras aportaciones teóricas de orden general. Resum: L’interés creixent de l’arqueologia en les estructures i pràctiques quotidianes permet la contemplació de l’ampla varietat d’ocupacions, activitats i actors que participen en el manteniment i la reproducció social i ecològica.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHY 469 – Theory in Archaeology
    ARCHY 469 – Theory in Archaeology Lecture: TTh 1:30 – 3:20pm, SMI 307 Instructor: Debora C. Trein Instructor’s office: DEN 133 Office Hours: F 11:30 – 1:30pm, or by appointment Email: [email protected] Source: unknown artist Course Description: How do we go from artifacts to statements about the lives of people in the past? How much of the past can we truly know, when most of the pertinent evidence has long since degraded, and when the people we aim to study are long dead? This course provides a broad survey of the major theoretical trends that have shaped anthropological archaeology over time. We will outline and examine some of the major publications, debates, and shifts in archaeological thought that have influenced the diverse ways in which we claim to know what we know about the past. In this course, we will explore the notion that the various intellectual approaches we employ to make statements about the past are influenced by the different perspectives we have of the relationship between the past and the present, the kinds of meaning we believe can be derived from the archaeological record, the questions we seek to answer, and the methods we use to retrieve (and prioritize) information. This course will start with a broad overview of the major periods of theoretical development in archaeology from the 1800s to the present, followed by discussions of how archaeologists tackle common archaeological questions through diverse theoretical lenses (and why sometimes they don’t tackle these questions at all). While the politics of archaeological practice will be 1 | Page touched upon throughout the course, we will devote the last quarter of the course to the repercussions of archaeological practice to present-day communities and stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • ANZAC Day Resources
    ANZAC Day Worship Resource Content Preface …3 Introduction …4 Service of Remembrance …5 Gathering …6 Word ...13 Remembrance …17 Sending …24 General Prayers …26 Hymn Suggestions …30 Public Services …33 Images Front Page 3rd Light Horse Chap Merrington 1915 Gallipoli Page 3 3rd Light Horse Burial ANZAC Day 1917 Cairo Page 5 1st Light Horse Funeral at Cairo Presbyterian Cemetary 1914-15 Page 6 CoE RC and Presb. Chaplains bury four British soldiers 1915 Page 13 Church parade at Ryrie's Post 1915 Gallipoli Page 17 3rd Light Horse Chap Merrington 1915 Gallipoli Page 25 Grave of an Australian Soldier 1915 Gallipoli Page 27 Soldiers on Gallipoli listening to sermon 1915 Page 31 Chaplain writing field card Greece, Date Unknown Page 34 Brockton WA WW! Memorial after ANZAC Day Service !2 Preface This resource has been compiled by Uniting Church in Australia ministers who are current- ly in placement as Chaplains in the Australian Defence Force. Some of them have seen deployments in places of war and served for many years while others are new to this min- istry who care for sailors, soldiers and airmen and women in the ADF and their families. These traditional and interactive prayers have been provided for congregations that will be remembering Australians throughout the centenary year of World War 1 and in particular the landings at Gallipoli. The prayers in this resource have been broken up in light of the four fold structure of wor- ship, as found in Uniting in Worship 2: Gathering, Word, Remembrance, and Sending. There is a fifth section which has been compiled from prayers used by Chaplains in public services, such as ANZAC Days and Remembrance Days.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ARCHEOLOGY of DEATH ANG6191 (Section 7964) Fall 2011
    THE ARCHEOLOGY OF DEATH ANG6191 (section 7964) Fall 2011 Instructor: Dr. James M. Davidson Course Level/Structure: Graduate seminar Time: Monday only -- periods 7 through 9 (1:55 pm to 4:55 pm) Class Room: MAT (Matherly Hall), Room 108 Office: Turlington B134 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Wed 1-3 (and by appointment) Website for electronic readings: http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/davidson/courses.htm Course Description and Objectives: The seminar’s goal is to provide a solid grounding in the anthropological literature of Mortuary studies; that is, data derived from a study of the Death Experience. In addition to archaeological data, a strong emphasis will be placed on the theoretical underpinnings of mortuary data, drawn from cultural anthropology and ethnography. Along with more theoretical papers, specific case studies will be used to address a variety of topics and issues, such as Social Organization and Social Structure, Spirituality and Religion, Skeletal Biology (e.g., Paleodemography, Paleopathology, and other issues of Bioarchaeology), Gender Issues, The Ethics of using Human Remains, and Post-Processual Critiques of Mortuary Archaeology. The time range that we will cover in the course will span from the Neolithic to the early 20th century, and numerous cultures from all parts of the globe will be our subject matter. Course Requirements: Class participation/attendance 5% Leading Class Discussion: 5% Synopses (of specific readings) 20% Two essay/reaction papers 20% Major research paper 50% Texts: 1). Chapman, Robert (editor) 1981 The Archaeology of Death. Cambridge University Press. 2). Parker Pearson, Mike 1999 The Archaeology of Death and Burial.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Identities and Merging with Animals
    This article was downloaded by: [Universitetsbiblioteket i Bergen] On: 15 August 2012, At: 05:24 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Norwegian Archaeological Review Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/sarc20 ‘I am the Walrus’: Animal Identities and Merging with Animals – Exceptional Experiences? Torill Christine Lindstrøm a a Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway Version of record first published: 08 Aug 2012 To cite this article: Torill Christine Lindstrøm (2012): ‘I am the Walrus’: Animal Identities and Merging with Animals – Exceptional Experiences?, Norwegian Archaeological Review, DOI:10.1080/00293652.2012.703687 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2012.703687 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and- conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal and Human Depictions on Artefacts from Early Anglo-Saxon Graves in the Light of Theories of Material Culture
    Animal and human depictions on artefacts from early Anglo-Saxon graves in the light of theories of material culture Submitted by Leah Moradi to the University of Exeter as a dissertation for the degree of Master of Arts by Research in Archaeology in January 2019 This thesis is made available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this dissertation which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: …………………………………………………………. Abstract This dissertation explores the relationship between animal and human motifs on early Anglo-Saxon (AD 450–650) artefacts and the individuals with whom the objects are buried, as well as the wider communities to which they belong. A sample of sites was taken from the two historical regions of East Anglia and Wessex, compiling data such as object type and material, sex and age of individuals, and the human and animal motifs depicted. From a total of 32 sites, 5560 graves were analyzed; of these, 198 graves from 28 sites contained artefacts with anthropomorphic and/or zoomorphic decoration. Anthropological and material culture theories of totemism, shamanism, animism, and object agency were employed in the interpretation of results to consider the symbolic meaning of anthropomorphically- and zoomorphically-decorated objects, and how they may have reflected the social organization and ideologies of communities in early Anglo-Saxon England.
    [Show full text]