DOCSLIB.ORG

About Early Russia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
About Early Russia CK_5_TH_HG_P104_230.QXD 2/14/06 2:23 PM Page 209 At a Glance continued ◗ Ivan III (the Great) and Ivan IV (the Terrible) expanded Russian terri- tory and the authority of the czars. ◗ Peter the Great sought to modernize and westernize Russia in order to enable it to compete with European nations for trade, territory, and prestige. ◗ The desire to find a warm-water port was one factor that encouraged Russian expansion. ◗ Catherine the Great, while once interested in reforming certain abuses of Russian government, became as autocratic as her predecessors after a peasant revolt and the French Revolution. ◗ The lives of peasants worsened under Peter and Catherine. Teaching Idea What Teachers Need to Know You may want to teach section B, A. History and Culture “Geography,” before “History and Culture.” Byzantine Influence in Russia The rise of Russia is closely related to the history of the Byzantine Empire, which students in Core Knowledge schools should have encountered in Grades 3 and 4. For a thousand years after the fall of the Roman Empire in the west, the Eastern or Byzantine Empire continued to build on ancient Greek and Roman tra- ditions and culture. For example, Byzantine architects used the Roman dome to build magnificent churches, such as Hagia Sophia in the Byzantine capital of Constantinople (now called Istanbul). Byzantine artists also created beautiful mosaics and icons. Students in Core Knowledge schools should have studied Hagia Sophia and Byzantine mosaics as part of the art curriculum for Grade 3. However, they may not be acquainted with icons, which are special pictures of Jesus, Mary, and the saints. Icons are meant to help Christians during worship and meditation. Constantinople was a great religious center, home of the Eastern Orthodox Church, which had split with the Roman Catholic Church in 1054. Constantinople was also the center of a vast trading network that connected Europe with the Middle East and Asia. Trade brought the Byzantine Empire great riches as well as new cultural influences. The influence of the Byzantine Empire in Russia dates at least to the 860s, when the Byzantine Emperor sent two monks to convert the Slavic people of Eastern Europe to Orthodox Christianity. At the time, the Slavs were pagans who worshipped many gods. The two monks sent to convert them were two brothers named Cyril and Methodius. Cyril and Methodius invented a new alphabet, called the Cyrillic alphabet after Cyril. The Cyrillic alphabet was loosely based on the Greek alphabet. Cyril and Methodius then taught the Slavs to read and write using the Cyrillic alphabet so that they could read the Bible. History and Geography: World 209 CK_5_TH_HG_P104_230.QXD 2/14/06 2:23 PM Page 210 VI. Russia: Early Growth and Expansion A little more than a century later, Christianity began to spread around Slavic and Russian territories, but many people remained pagans. Once such person was Prince Vladimir, the ruler of the city-state of Kiev, which would become the first Russian state. According to legend, the prince sent emissaries to investigate the major monotheistic religions of his day: Eastern Orthodox Christianity, Roman Catholic Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. When his emissaries visited Constantinople and saw Hagia Sophia, they were astonished and overwhelmed by the beauty of the church, its dome, and its mosaics. Surely, they thought, this is the house of the true God. Vladimir selected Orthodox Christianity as his own religion, and decided it would also be the religion of his people. It is also possi- ble that he may have been influenced to convert to Christianity by the economic and political advantages of an alliance with Byzantium, as well as in order to get approval to marry the Byzantine emperor’s sister. He ordered the old pagan idols thrown into the Dnieper River and conducted mass baptisms in the same river. Adoption of Eastern Orthodox Christianity had a number of benefits for the Russians. It strengthened the commercial ties between Russia and the Byzantine Empire and also provided the basis for the development of a national identity among the various Russian city-states by giving them something in common. Over time, princes of the various city-states adopted the written language of the empire, as well as its architecture, music, and art. Like the Byzantine emperor, the Russian czars (also spelled tsars) would claim jurisdiction over the church in Russia, thus strengthening their own power. Similar to the monarchs of western Europe, the Russian czars also came to believe in the theory of the divine right of kings—that they ruled as the representative of God on Earth, and as such, their authority was absolute. Moscow as the Third Rome Over time Kiev became less important and Moscow, to the north, became more important. Moscow became the headquarters of the Russian church. When the Byzantine Empire fell to the Turks in 1453, the rulers of Moscow announced that Moscow was “The Third Rome.” Rome had been the capital city of Christianity and so the “spiritual center of the world,” but then the popes and the Roman Catholic church had fallen into heresy and false belief. After 1054, when the Orthodox Church split with the Roman Catholic Church, Constantinople had become the new “spiritual center of the world,” the “Second Rome.” When Constantinople fell to the Turks in 1453, the Russians thought Moscow was poised to take its place and become the latest spiritual center of the world, the “Third Rome.” The Czars Ivan III Beginning in 1236, Mongols, nomadic warriors from Central Asia, had invad- ed and conquered large parts of Russia. Students in Core Knowledge schools should have learned about the Mongols in the Grade 4 section on China. The same people who swept south to conquer China swept north to conquer large parts of Russia. In return for acknowledging the Mongols as their rulers and pay- ing tribute to them, the princes of the various states were allowed to keep their lands and titles. The Mongols remained in power until 1480 when Ivan III declared Russia free of Mongol rule. 210 Grade 5 Handbook CK_5_TH_HG_P104_230.QXD 2/14/06 2:23 PM Page 211 Ivan III, also known as Ivan the Great, had come to power as the Grand Prince of Moscow in 1462. During his reign of 43 years, he extended Moscow’s Teaching Idea control over a large area, annexing land from other city-states and from the Poles, Using Instructional Master 25, Czars Lithuanians, and Mongols. of Russia (1613–1917), have students The government was centralized and Ivan asserted his influence over the keep a chart of the czars, their dates, church. He surrounded himself with the splendor and ceremony befitting an and their accomplishments. emperor and adopted as the symbol of the czar the Byzantine symbol of the dou- ble eagle. Ivan’s reign laid the foundation for the later Russian state. Ivan IV Ivan IV, also known as Ivan the Terrible, reigned from 1533 to 1584. He greatly expanded Russia’s borders, extending Russian rule throughout the Name Date Czars of Russia (1613–1917) Volga River Basin to the Caspian Sea and pushing across the Ural Mountains Study the family tree Mikhail Feodorovich and useEvdokia it Lukianovnato answer the (1596–1645) Streshneva 1613–45 questions on Master Alexei Mikhailovich 25b.Natalia Kirillovna Naryshkina Maria Miloslavskaya into Siberia. His attempt to win a foothold on the Baltic Sea was less success- (1629–76) 1645–76 Sofia Alexeena Feodor Alexeevich Ivan V Praskovia Saltykova (1657–1704) (1661–82) (1666–96) ful. The Swedes and Poles defeated the Russian forces. 1682–89 1676–82 1682–96 PeterEvdokia the Fedorovna Great LopuhinaEkaterina Skawronska (1672–1725) Charlotta Sofia 1682–1725 Czarevich Alexei Crown Princess Unknown Anna Ivanovna Petrovich (1693–1740) Ivan earned his nickname because of his cruelty. He was initially called 1730–40 Elizaveta Petrovna Anna Petrovna Karl Friedrich (1709–61) 1741–61 Anna Prince Anton Leopoldovna Ulrich Peter II Catherine the Great Peter III “Ivan the Terrible” because he terrified his enemies, but later he also began (1715–30) (1729–96) (1728–62) 1727–30 1762–96 1761–62 Paul I Maria Fyodorovna Ivan VI (1754–1801) (1740–64) to terrify his own people. Indeed, he became one of history’s most famous 1796–1801 1740–41 Alexandra Nicholas I Alexander I Fyodorovna (1796–1855) (1777–1825) 1825–55 1801–25 Alexander II Maria Aleksandrovna examples of the paranoid tyrant. Convinced that enemies and intrigue sur- (1818–1881) 1855–1881 Alexander III Maria Fyodorovna (1845–94) 1881–94 rounded him, Ivan IV was suspicious of everyone. He established the Nicholas II (1868–1918) 1894–1917 Oprichniki, a group of special guards, to search out traitors among his sub- Purpose: To gain a greater Knowledge Foundation Copyright ©Core understanding of Master 25a the hereditary Grade 5: History & Geography jects. They acted like secret police and wore black uniforms. These police- monarchy in czarist Russia men could throw people in jail or torture them on the slightest suspicion of disloyalty. Ivan the Terrible also had a terrible temper. One day in a fit of anger, Use Instructional Master 25a–25b. he hit his eldest son so hard that he killed him. Ivan also established the Zemski Sobor, or land assembly, to act as an adviso- ry body to the czar. It was the first national assembly of Russians ever convened. However, Ivan IV was even more autocratic than Ivan III had been. In an effort to rid himself of any threat from the boyars, who were hereditary aristocrats, he had Teaching Idea many of them accused of treason. He then seized their lands and divided the lands If you have taught Section V of World among a new class of landholders that he created.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Byzantines, Jews, and Latins in Medieval Bulgaria: Others, Within
    Reviews Рецензии Byzantines, Jews, and Византийцы, иудеи Latins in Medieval и латиняне Bulgaria: Others, в средневековой Болгарии: within and outside Другие внутри the Commonwealth и вне сообщества Dmitry I. Polyvyannyy Дмитрий Игоревич Полывянный Ivanovo State University, Ивановский государственный Ivanovo, Russia университет, Иваново, Россия АНГЕЛОВ П., Чуждите народи в представите на средновековния българин, София, ТАНГРА ТанНакРА ИК ООД, 2013, 262 с. Professor Peter Angelov, the renowned medievalist from Sofia University “St. Clement of Ohrid,” has published a new book, Foreign Peoples as Viewed by a Medieval Bulgarian, following the path laid out in his previous works on images of Bulgaria and Bulgarians in Byzantium and on medieval Bulgarian diplomacy [Angelov 1999; idem 2011]. His new research uncovers unexplored perspectives provided by an imagological approach to the study of the Bulgarian mind during the Middle Ages, and he raises new questions about the rare written, iconographical, and folklore evidence that originated in both domest ic and foreign sources. Angelov chooses as his subjects those who differ from Bul garians by faith (for example, Judaists and Catholics) and by the polities to which they belonged (for example, Byzantines or Westerners, who, in medieval Bulgaria, were called Franks or Latins). Depending on the circumstances, members of each of these groups might be considered by the medieval Bulgarian state and society as insiders or outsiders. Proving that this situation to some extent was rooted in the regional specifics of Bulgaria, Angelov quotes the evidence of writings by Demetrios Chomatenos, arch­ bishop of Bulgaria (1216–1236), which state that the territory of his diocese, with its see in Ohrid, “from ancient times was allowed to be inhabited by peoples of other faiths and by different pagans, namely Jews, Armenians, Ishmaelites, Hagarians, etc.” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Christianization of the Territory of Today's Moravia and Slovakia Before 8631 Pokristjanjevanje Ozemlja Današnje Moravske In
    655 Izvirni znanstveni članek/Article (1.01) Bogoslovni vestnik/Theological Quarterly 80 (2020) 3, 655—667 Besedilo prejeto/Received:04/2020; sprejeto/Accepted:07/2020 UDK/UDC: 272-9(437.32+437.6) DOI: 10.34291/BV2020/03/Ivanic © 2020 Ivanič, CC BY 4.0 Peter Ivanič Christianization of the Territory of Today’s Moravia and Slovakia before 8631 Pokristjanjevanje ozemlja današnje Moravske in Slo- vaške pred letom 863 Abstract: Christianization, associated with consolidation of power and establish- ment of early Christian state formations, contributed significantly to creation of medieval Europe. Although the territory of today´s Moravia (eastern part of the Czech Republic) and Slovakia came into contact with Christianity already at the end of antiquity, the more intensive Christianization of these lands took place only from the 8th century, when this territory was settled by Slavs. Mis- sionaries from the Frankish Empire, from the territory of Istria, Dalmatia and northern Italy came here. Domestic Slavic elites started to convert to Christian- ity as from the 9th century. For them, Christianity became a means of recogniz- ing their social status externally and allowed them to integrate with the more culturally advanced Christian world. Archaeological findings (e.g. crosses and captorgs, plaques and bells from Bojná, objects of secular character), written sources, sacral architecture and burying methods testify to the existence of Christianity in the territory of today´s Moravia and Slovakia, especially in cen- ters of the power. Key words: christianization, Christianity, missionaries, Slovakia, Moravia Povzetek: Pokristjanjevanje, povezano z utrjevanjem oblasti in vzpostavljanjem zgodnjih krščanskih državnih tvorb, je odločilno prispevalo k oblikovanju sre- dnjeveške Evrope.
    [Show full text]
  • The Responses of Pope Nicholas I to the Questions of the Bulgars AD
    The Responses of Pope Nicholas I to the Questions of the Bulgars A.D. 866 (Letter 99) Translated by W. L. North from the edition of Ernest Perels, in MGH Epistolae VI, Berlin, 1925, pp.568-600. Introduction Since the sixth century, the Bulgars had known intermittent contact with the Christians of the surrounding nations, whether as merchants or prisoners-of-war or through diplomatic relations. During the later eighth and early ninth century, the Christian population in Bulgar lands increased so much that Christians were rumored to have influence at the court of Khan Krum (802-814); they were also persecuted under Khan Omortag (814-31). The Bulgars continued to remain "officially" pagan until the reign of Khan Boris, who came to power around 852. Several factors may have led Khan Boris to assume a more favorable attitude towards Christianity. First, Christianity offered a belief-system that transcended — at least potentially — cultural or ethnic boundaries and thereby offered a means not only to unify Bulgaria's disparate populations but also to secure legitimacy and respect with Byzantium and the West. The ideology of Christian rulership also enhanced the position of the prince vis-à-vis his subjects including the often contentious boyars. Furthermore, Boris' sister had converted to Christianity while a hostage in Constantinople and may have influenced her brother. Finally, Boris himself seems to have been attracted to Christian beliefs and practices, as evidenced by the seriousness with which he pursued the conversion of his people. Boris' move towards Christianity seems to have begun in earnest with the opening of negotiations in 862 between himself and Louis the German for an alliance against Ratislav of Moravia.
    [Show full text]
  • Papal Infallibility Judith A
    Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects Religion 1964 Papal infallibility Judith A. Giffrow Illinois Wesleyan University Recommended Citation Giffrow, Judith A., "Papal infallibility" (1964). Honors Projects. Paper 13. http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/religion_honproj/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Ames Library, the Andrew W. Mellon Center for Curricular and Faculty Development, the Office of the Provost and the Office of the President. It has been accepted for inclusion in Digital Commons @ IWU by the faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # JUDITH A" GIFFROW # # ! J # # # # 4]: # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # PAPAL INFA LL I BILITY # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # � # Church Seminar 1r # # # . James Whitehurst # # # # June 1964 # # # # # # # # # # # ################################################## as its to "" .. r, ..... ,,,,,",.., ore great within and without the Roman Church. 0 • Papal Infallibility. While the writer does not presuppose to be qualified to pass IIjudgement" on the subject, it is nonetheless hoped that the readers will find the paper of interest and will come to a better understanding of Papal In­ fallibility even if they find they are not able to "acceptll it as a part of the "genius" of Roman Catholicism. It seems to the writer that the Doctrine of Papal Infallibility has become as controversial as the problem of scriptural inerrancy versus modern science. Understanding will not mean that the contribut ions of the papal tradition to the religious life of mankind will become any less distinctive than they are now. It is certa Inly not as a to, or as a means for, Protestant of this tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret Serbian-Bulgarian Treaty of Alliance of 1904 and the Russian Policy in the Balkans Before the Bosnian Crisis
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2007 The Secret Serbian-Bulgarian Treaty of Alliance of 1904 and the Russian Policy in the Balkans Before the Bosnian Crisis Kiril Valtchev Merjanski Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the History Commons Repository Citation Merjanski, Kiril Valtchev, "The Secret Serbian-Bulgarian Treaty of Alliance of 1904 and the Russian Policy in the Balkans Before the Bosnian Crisis" (2007). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 96. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/96 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SECRET SERBIAN-BULGARIAN TREATY OF ALLIANCE OF 1904 AND THE RUSSIAN POLICY IN THE BALKANS BEFORE THE BOSNIAN CRISIS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts By KIRIL VALTCHEV MERJANSKI M.A., Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Bulgaria 2007 Wright State University COPYRIGHT BY KIRIL VALTCHEV MERJANSKI 2006 WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES Winter Quarter 2007 I hereby recommend that the thesis prepared under my supervision by KIRIL VALTCHEV MERJANSKI entitled THE SECRET SERBIAN-BULGARIAN TREATY OF ALLIANCE OF 1904 AND THE RUSSIAN POLICY IN THE BALKANS BEFORE THE BOSNIAN CRISIS be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POCKET GUIDE to the Popes 
    THE POCKET GUIDE TO the Popes RICHARD P. McBRIEN Contents Introduction 1 The Popes 11 Index of Names 339 About the Author Other Books by Richard P. McBrien Credits Cover Copyright About the Publisher introduction This book contains the abridged profiles of all of the popes of the Catholic Church organized chronologically according to the dates of their respective terms of office. For the complete profiles, readers should consult the full edition, originally published in hard cover by HarperSanFrancisco in 1997, subsequently released in paperback in 2000, and finally issued in an updated edi- tion that includes Pope Benedict XVI in 2006. The full edition contains many original features; this abridged edition is limited to profiles of individual popes that rely upon secondary source material for their factual and historical content. For a listing of these sources and an explanation of how they were incorporated into the pro- files, the reader should consult the Preface and the Select Bibliography of the full edition. WHAT IS A POPE? The offi ce occupied by the pope is known as the papacy. The pope’s principal title is Bishop of Rome. In addition to his immediate pastoral responsibilities as Bishop of Rome, the pope also exercises a special ministry on be- half of the universal Church. It is called the Petrine min- istry, because the Catholic Church considers the pope to be the successor of the Apostle Peter. As such, he has the 2 the pocket guide to the popes duty to preserve the unity of the worldwide Church and to support all of his brother bishops in the service of their own respective dioceses.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Th Notes: Chapter 1.5 I
    7th Notes: Chapter 1.5 I. Two Christian Churches 1. Roman Catholic Church was based in Rome, capital of the Western Roman Empire. a) Church was led by the pope 2. Byzantine Empire developed their own church, the Eastern Orthodox Church a) Church reflect Greek heritage. A. Byzantine Government and Religion 1. The Byzantine Emperor and church officials worked closely together. 2. Byzantines believed the emperor was God’s representative on Earth. a) Beginning 400s C.E., emperors were crowned in a religious ceremony. b) They took an oath to defend the Eastern Orthodox Christianity. c) Emperors believed it was their duty to unite the empire under one Christian faith. d) Emperors appointed church leaders and defined how people would worship. e) They also controlled the wealth and settled disputes about church beliefs. B. What are Icons? 1. In 700s C.E., heated dispute about icons divided the Eastern Orthodox Church a) Icons are painting of Jesus, Mary (the mother of Jesus), and the saints or Christian holy people. 2. Byzantines displayed icons in their homes a) Believed the images symbolized the presence of God. b) Images helped people understand Christianity teachings. 3. Churches covered walls with icons. 4. Some Byzantines, did not approve of the use of icons. a) Thought it was a form of idol worship which is forbidden by God. 5. In 756 C.E., Emperor Leo III ordered all icons to be removed from the churches. a) Government official that carried out the orders were called “iconoclasts” meaning image breakers. b) Today the word refers to someone who criticizes traditional beliefs or practices.
    [Show full text]
  • 59 the Origins of the Byzantine Empire: Anachronism and Evolution
    The Origins of the Byzantine Empire: Anachronism and Evolution in Modern Historiography Joseph D. Wagner Introduction The modern understanding of the Byzantine Empire, the Roman Empire, which survived in Eastern Europe for over a thousand years, is a fallacy. There is no doubt that the Byzantines existed or that their empire occupied a place in the pantheon of world power. The issue under consideration is not so much when the Byzantine Empire began, but rather when this evolution of the Roman Empire first took place and how modern scholars view Byzantine origins. The term Byzantine Empire is an anachronism because what modern historiography calls “the Byzantines” never existed. Rather, these people considered themselves Roman even until the collapse of their empire in 1453 CE. This is relevant in today’s historiography for many reasons, among them because the Byzantine have not been studied with as much vigor as compared to their Greek and Roman ancestors. This is also an important historical issue because of a recent book detailing how the Byzantines dealt with their neighbors over the centuries. Edward Luttwak, a former political advisor and Johns Hopkins-trained historian, argued in his 2009 book The Grand Strategy of the Byzantine Empire that the Byzantines were skilled diplomats, using money and land transfers to keep invading armies at bay.279 Luttwak proceeded to question whether these same strategies could be applied elsewhere; for example, in the United States. There are three schools of thought that rise from the relevant historiography: The Continuity School, the Discontinuity School, and the Evolution School. All three schools of thought will be discussed with due reference to their authors after an explanation of methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • How Armenians Made Byzantium
    Armstrong Undergraduate Journal of History Volume 6 Issue 2 Article 2 11-2016 Inside and Outside the Purple: How Armenians Made Byzantium Michael Goodyear University of Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/aujh Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Goodyear, Michael (2016) "Inside and Outside the Purple: How Armenians Made Byzantium," Armstrong Undergraduate Journal of History: Vol. 6 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. DOI: 10.20429/aujh.2016.060202 Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/aujh/vol6/iss2/2 This article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Armstrong Undergraduate Journal of History by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Goodyear: Inside and Outside the Purple: How Armenians Made Byzantium Inside and Outside the Purple: How Armenians Made Byzantium Michael Goodyear University of Chicago (Chicago, Illinois) In the past few decades, there has been an increasing academic and popular focus on ethnic minorities, even turning minority studies into a viable academic field. In this new trend, however, minority studies are primarily focused on the present and recent past. This ignores the importance of historical minorities, especially ones that impacted states to such a degree as the Armenians impacted the Byzantine Empire. In addition to their own national history and culture, ethnic Armenians were also a highly important minority inside the Byzantine Empire.1 During the middle centuries of Byzantium, from 610 to 1071, the Armenian populace served as an important source of manpower, and individuals of Armenian descent rose to the highest dignities in the Byzantine Empire as generals, politicians, patriarchs, intellectuals, and even emperors.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Perspectives on Petrine Ministry and Papal Primacy Denis Fortin Andrews University, [email protected]
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Faculty Publications Theology & Christian Philosophy January 2003 Current Perspectives on Petrine Ministry and Papal Primacy Denis Fortin Andrews University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theology-christian- philosophy-pubs Part of the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Fortin, Denis, "Current Perspectives on Petrine Ministry and Papal Primacy" (2003). Faculty Publications. Paper 12. http://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theology-christian-philosophy-pubs/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Theology & Christian Philosophy at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Andnfy~University Seminary St~dicr,VoL 41, No. 2,199-214. Copyright O 2003 Andrews University Press. CURRENT PERSPECTIVES ON PETRINE MINISTRY AND PAPAL PRIMACY DENISFORTIN Andrews University Interest in the papacy and its role in Christianity is increasing. Two recent bestsellers have raised some contentious issues regarding the integrity of the ministry of the successor of Peter. The publication of John Cornwell's Hither's Pope: The Serret Histoy ofPk XII caused a stirring of opinions regardng Pius XII's alleged complicity with the Nazi's "fmal solution."' Garry Wills's Papal Sin: Stmcttrre~ofDeceit
    [Show full text]
  • The Understanding of Papal Supremacy As Revealed in the Letters of Pope Gregory the Great
    Academic Essays The Understanding of Papal Supremacy as revealed in the Letters of Pope Gregory the Great by Graham Nicholson By the end of the sixth century, the city of Rome had been without the emperor in residence for over 250 years and itself outside the empire for a period of nearly seventy years before the disastrously liberating twenty years of war under the policies of the Emperor Justinian. The years of absent emperors and barbarian government had forced the Bishop of Rome to seek out a new identity, and had allowed that to happen free from the constraints of immediate imperial control. With the emperor’s departure, and Constantinople’s subsequent claim to be the “New Rome” with all the attendant ecclesiastical privileges at Constantinople in 381, some new rationale for Roman primacy was needed. Pope Damasus I (366-384) promptly convened a council which replied that primacy was not a matter of synodical decree but of apostolic foundation and divine decree.1 To this Pope Leo I (440-461) added a juristic basis with the idea of personal legal succession of monarchical government.2 What was once Peter’s was now inheritable, and an ongoing reality. The Christian corpus was founded on the Petrine commission and the emperor as a member of that corpus was charged with its protection. Other early Popes after Leo continued to build on these claims, helped by ecclesio-political events in Constantinople. In 482 Emperor Zeno issued his Henotikon as an attempt to ease growing political pressures from the monophysite “wing” of the eastern Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Factors in the Decline of the Byzantine Empire -- PETER CHARANIS, Rutgers University Questions
    Economic Factors in the Decline of the Byzantine Empire -- PETER CHARANIS, Rutgers University Questions. Be specific in your responses and provide examples from the article. 1. What does the author identify as the reason(s) for the decline of the Byzantine Empire? 2. How was the demographic make-up of the Byzantine Empire similar to that of other large empires? In what ways was their response similar other empires? 3. Describe the theme system and identify the role it played in Byzantine political, economic and social life? 4. Identify instances of reform by Byzantine emperors. What were the motivating factors behind these reforms? 5. In what ways was the decline of the Byzantine Empire similar to the decline of empires of the classical age? 6. Does the experience of the Byzantine Empire suggest universal challenges to maintaining large multi-ethnic empires? IT IS now five hundred years since the Byzantine empire was brought to an end by Venice, served the Ottoman sultans as vassals, or miserably toured the West the Ottoman Turks. Scholars today quite justly reject Gibbon's assumption that begging for help in return for which they were ready to sacrifice the religious the Byzantine empire was, throughout its entire existence, in a state of decline. traditions of their people. What a far cry from the august position of their They have come to rank it, instead, as one of the great empires in history.1 And predecessors of the tenth century who challenged East and West and challenged this for good reasons. It endured for over a thousand years.
    [Show full text]