DOCSLIB.ORG

Official Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Official Report ISSN no 1148 - 4292 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND TOURISM Official Report OF THE COMMISSION OF INVESTIGATION INTO THE ACCIDENT ON 20 JANUARY 1992 NEAR MONT SAINTE ODILE (BAS-RHIN) OF THE AIRBUS A.320 REGISTERED F-GGED OPERATED BY AIR INTER FRANCE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND TOURISM __________ Commission of Investigation into the accident on 20 January 1992 of Airbus A320 F-GGED near Mont Sainte-Odile (Bas-Rhin) O F F I C I A L R E P O R T into the accident on 20 January 1992 near Mont Sainte-Odile (Bas-Rhin) of the AIRBUS A320 registered F-GGED operated by Air Inter -:-:-:­ 26 November 1993 - CONTENTS - Notice Organisation of work Synopsis SECTION 1. - FACTUAL INFORMATION. 1.1 - Flight progress. 1.2 - Killed and injured. 1.3 - Damage to the aircraft. 1.4 - Other damage. 1.5 - Personnel information. 1.6 - Aircraft information. 1.7 - Information relating to the Operator and the Civil Aviation authorities. 1.8 - Weather information. 1.9 - Navigational aids. 1.10 - Telecommunications. 1.11 - Airport information. 1.12 - Recording equipment. 1.13 - Details of wreckage and impact. 1.14 - Medical and pathological information. 1.15 - Fire. 1.16 - Questions relative to the survival of occupants. 116.1 - Aspects relative to the cabin. 116.2 - Organisation of searches. 116.3 - Organisation of rescue services. 1.17 - Testing and research. 117.1 - Evaluation of propulsion systems, Auxilliary Power Unit (APU) and fuel. 117.2 - Examination of the chain of pitch control. 117.3 - Examination of on-board navigation systems. 117.4 - Evaluation of ground-based radio navigation installations. 117.5 - Examination of Autopilot vertical mode on final approach. 117.6 - Examination of events linked to abnormal rate of descent. 117.7 - Synthesis of flight simulator research. 117.8 - Research relating to flight path. 117.9 - Testing and research relating to Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS). 1.18 - Supplementary information. 118.1 - Certification of the ergonomics of the A320 flight deck. 118.2 - Controlled flights into terrain and avoidance systems. 118.3 - Emergency Locator Transmitter. 118.4 - Developments in the regulations concerning Digital Flight Data Recorders (DFDR) and Cockpit Voice Recorders (CVR). 118.5 - Co-ordination of the technical investigation and the judicial inquiry. 118.6 - The feed-back loop. 1.19 - Specific methods of investigation. 119.1 - Optical reading by garnet of the recorders' tapes. 119.2 - Victim identification techniques. 1.20 - Witness evidence. SECTION 2. - ANALYSIS. 2.1 - Analysis of the accident scenario. 21.1 - Principles and elements of analysis. 21.2 - Hypothetical flight path controlled by the crew. 21.3 - Hypothetical flight path not controlled by the crew. 21.4 - Conclusion on the hypotheses retained. 21.5 - Reconstruction of the most probable scenario. 2.2 - Analysis of the immediate causes of the accident. 22.1 - Technical malfunctions. 22.2 - Professional competence of the crew. 22.3 - Aircraft/crew interface. 22.4 - Internal relations among the crew. 22.5 - Relationships between crew and procedures. 22.6 - Relationships between crew and Control. 22.7 - Relationships between crew and environment. 2.3 - Analysis of related factors - regulatory, organisational, structural. 23.1 - Relevant factors associated with Air Inter. 23.2 - The exercising of supervision over Air Inter by the DGAC. 23.3 - Certification of the aircraft. 23.4 - The feed-back loop. 2.4 - Survival, search and rescue. 2.5 - Recording equipment. SECTION 3. - CONCLUSION. 3.1 - Facts established by the Investigation. 3.2 - Conclusions relative to the immediate causes of the accident. 3.3 - Conclusions relative to operational background. 3.4 - Conclusions relative to search and rescue operations. SECTION 4. - RECOMMENDATIONS. 4.1 - Recommendations relative to the crew. 4.2 - Recommendations relative to Ground Proximity Warning Systems. 4.3 - Recommendations relative to recording equipment. 4.4 - Recommendations relative to the ergonomics of the aircraft/crew interface and to its certification. 4.5 - Recommendations relative to survival. 4.6 - Recommendations relative to air traffic procedures. 4.7 - Recommendations relative to State supervision. 4.8 - Recommendations relative to the feed-back loop. APPENDICES Appendix 0 : Glossary. Appendix 1 : Location of accident site. Appendix 2 : Topographical plan of accident site. Appendix 3 : Sketch showing distribution of wreckage. Appendix 4 : Sketch showing distribution of sources of fire. Appendix 5 : Drawing showing distribution of survivors on board. Appendix 6 : Arrival and approach procedure charts: - issued by the SIA - available to the crew. Appendix 7 : Graphs showing Quick Access Recorder (QAR) parameter extracts. Appendix 8 : Extracts from Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) transcription. Appendix 9 : Transcription of Air Traffic Control (ATC) radio communications. Appendix 10: Transcription of the telephonic communication between the Centre Régionale de la Navigation Aérienne Est (Eastern Regional Centre for Air Navigation), and Strasbourg Approach. Appendix 11: Radar flight path analysis and associated technical note. Appendix 12: Flight Management Guidance Computer 1 (FMGC1) flight path analysis and synthesised flight path analysis. Appendix 13: Meteorological records. Appendix 14: Tree of potential causes of the accident. Appendix 15: Description of aircraft control and navigation systems. Appendix 16: Photographs. NOTICE This report sets out the technical conclusions reached by the Commission of Investigation concerning the circumstances and causes of this accident. In accordance with Annex 13 of the Convention relating to international civil aviation, the analysis and safety recommendations drawn up in this report do not aim to apportion blame or to assess individual or collective responsibility. Their sole objective is to derive from this occurrence the lessons necessary to prevent future accidents. With this in mind, and because doubt must be of ultimate benefit to safety, some of the recommendations proposed concern points which it has so far not been possible to validate categorically or which occasionally have no direct relationship to the causes of the accident. Moreover, the analysis and recommendations have been drawn up following exhaustive investigation and are therefore based on an experience and understanding of events which may differ substantially from those prevailing at the precise time of the accident. Finally, although the people and organisations whose opinions were deemed to be relevant were invited to present their observations at the appropriate time, the Investigation was not conducted in an adversarial manner. As a consequence, the use of this report for any purposes other than for the prevention of accidents could lead to erroneous interpretations. - SYNOPSIS - Date of the accident Aircraft: Monday 20 January 1992 AIRBUS A320 at 18.20 UTC (*) Registration F-GGED Site of accident Owner: Place known as "La Bloss" DIA A.I. France LTD Barr Commune (Bas-Rhin) 7-2, YAESU 2-CHOME, CHUO-KU (near Mont Sainte-Odile) TOKYO 104 JAPAN Type of flight Operator Scheduled flight The company AIR INTER Public transport (passengers) Persons on board 2 Flight crew 4 Cabin crew 90 passengers Summary During a VORTAC approach, carried out at night and in IMC conditions towards runway 05 at Strasbourg-Entzheim, the aircraft crashed into the mountain known as "La Bloss" during its descent towards the runway, at an altitude of approximately 800 metres and a distance of approximately 10.5 nautical miles from the runway threshold. Consequences Injuries Equipment Cargo Third party Fatal Serious Slight Crew 5 1 100% 100% Approx. 1 destroyed destroyed hectare of forest Passengers 82 4 4 destroyed (*) Times referred to in this report are expressed in Universal Time Co-ordinated (UTC). One hour should be added to give French time on the day of the accident. ORGANISATION OF WORK 1 - COMPOSITION OF THE COMMISSION OF INVESTIGATION By Arrêtés (Orders) dated 21 and 27 January 1992, the Ministry of Transport and Tourism established a Commission of Investigation to investigate the circumstances, research the causes and determine the lessons to be drawn from the accident of an aircraft of the type Airbus A320 operated by the company Air Inter which occurred on 20 January 1992 within the territory of the Barr Commune (Bas-Rhin). The Commission comprised the following members: M. Alain Monnier, ingénieur général de l'aviation civile, Chairman M. Paul Arslanian, Head, Bureau Enquêtes-Accidents, Vice Chairman M. Pierre Bernard, technical investigator, Bureau Enquêtes-Accidents M. Jean-Louis Chatelain, airline pilot, captain M. Philippe Gourguechon, Pilot Inspector, Organisme du Contrôle en Vol (Flight Inspection Organisation) M. Michel Guillaume, conseiller d'Etat Colonel Guy Lagrange, Chief of Staff of the Direction de la circulation aérienne militaire (Military Air Traffic Directorate) M. Dominique Marbouty, ingénieur général de la météorologie Professor Henri Marotte, médecin-chef, centre d'essais en vol (Flight Test Centre) M. Jean Pariès, Deputy, Bureau Enquêtes-Accidents M. Frédéric Rico, Deputy, navigation aérienne (Air Navigation Department) M. Alain Tert, Deputy for Technical Affairs, centre d'essais en vol (Flight Test Centre) Monsieur Jean Pariès, a member of the Commission, acted as Investigator-In-Charge. In order to apply the provisions of Annex 13 of the convention relating to international civil aviation, Mr. Robert M. MacIntosh, accredited United States representative in the capacity of State
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CC22 N848AE HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 5 £1 CC203 OK
    CC22 N848AE HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 5 £1 CC203 OK-HFM Tupolev Tu-134 CSA -large OK on fin 91 2 £3 CC211 G-31-962 HP Jetstream 31 American eagle 92 2 £1 CC368 N4213X Douglas DC-6 Northern Air Cargo 88 4 £2 CC373 G-BFPV C-47 ex Spanish AF T3-45/744-45 78 1 £4 CC446 G31-862 HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 3 £1 CC487 CS-TKC Boeing 737-300 Air Columbus 93 3 £2 CC489 PT-OKF DHC8/300 TABA 93 2 £2 CC510 G-BLRT Short SD-360 ex Air Business 87 1 £2 CC567 N400RG Boeing 727 89 1 £2 CC573 G31-813 HP Jetstream 31 white 88 1 £1 CC574 N5073L Boeing 727 84 1 £2 CC595 G-BEKG HS 748 87 2 £2 CC603 N727KS Boeing 727 87 1 £2 CC608 N331QQ HP Jetstream 31 white 88 2 £1 CC610 D-BERT DHC8 Contactair c/s 88 5 £1 CC636 C-FBIP HP Jetstream 31 white 88 3 £1 CC650 HZ-DG1 Boeing 727 87 1 £2 CC732 D-CDIC SAAB SF-340 Delta Air 89 1 £2 CC735 C-FAMK HP Jetstream 31 Canadian partner/Air Toronto 89 1 £2 CC738 TC-VAB Boeing 737 Sultan Air 93 1 £2 CC760 G31-841 HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 3 £1 CC762 C-GDBR HP Jetstream 31 Air Toronto 89 3 £1 CC821 G-DVON DH Devon C.2 RAF c/s VP955 89 1 £1 CC824 G-OOOH Boeing 757 Air 2000 89 3 £1 CC826 VT-EPW Boeing 747-300 Air India 89 3 £1 CC834 G-OOOA Boeing 757 Air 2000 89 4 £1 CC876 G-BHHU Short SD-330 89 3 £1 CC901 9H-ABE Boeing 737 Air Malta 88 2 £1 CC911 EC-ECR Boeing 737-300 Air Europa 89 3 £1 CC922 G-BKTN HP Jetstream 31 Euroflite 84 4 £1 CC924 I-ATSA Cessna 650 Aerotaxisud 89 3 £1 CC936 C-GCPG Douglas DC-10 Canadian 87 3 £1 CC940 G-BSMY HP Jetstream 31 Pan Am Express 90 2 £2 CC945 7T-VHG Lockheed C-130H Air Algerie
    [Show full text]
  • Home at Airbus
    Journal of Aircraft and Spacecraft Technology Original Research Paper Home at Airbus 1Relly Victoria Virgil Petrescu, 2Raffaella Aversa, 3Bilal Akash, 4Juan M. Corchado, 2Antonio Apicella and 1Florian Ion Tiberiu Petrescu 1ARoTMM-IFToMM, Bucharest Polytechnic University, Bucharest, (CE), Romania 2Advanced Material Lab, Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, Second University of Naples, 81031 Aversa (CE), Italy 3Dean of School of Graduate Studies and Research, American University of Ras Al Khaimah, UAE 4University of Salamanca, Spain Article history Abstract: Airbus Commerci al aircraft, known as Airbus, is a European Received: 16-04-2017 aeronautics manufacturer with headquarters in Blagnac, in the suburbs of Revised: 18-04-2017 Toulouse, France. The company, which is 100% -owned by the industrial Accepted: 04-07-2017 group of the same name, manufactures more than half of the airliners produced in the world and is Boeing's main competitor. Airbus was Corresponding Author: founded as a consortium by European manufacturers in the late 1960s. Florian Ion Tiberiu Petrescu Airbus Industry became a SAS (simplified joint-stock company) in 2001, a ARoTMM-IFToMM, Bucharest subsidiary of EADS renamed Airbus Group in 2014 and Airbus in 2017. Polytechnic University, Bucharest, (CE) Romania BAE Systems 20% of Airbus between 2001 and 2006. In 2010, 62,751 Email: [email protected] people are employed at 18 Airbus sites in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium (SABCA) and Spain. Even if parts of Airbus aircraft are essentially made in Europe some come from all over the world. But the final assembly lines are in Toulouse (France), Hamburg (Germany), Seville (Spain), Tianjin (China) and Mobile (United States).
    [Show full text]
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 25 Box 31/3 Airline Codes
    March 2021 APPENDIX 25 BOX 31/3 AIRLINE CODES The information in this document is provided as a guide only and is not professional advice, including legal advice. It should not be assumed that the guidance is comprehensive or that it provides a definitive answer in every case. Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 000 ANTONOV DESIGN BUREAU 001 AMERICAN AIRLINES 005 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 006 DELTA AIR LINES 012 NORTHWEST AIRLINES 014 AIR CANADA 015 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES 016 UNITED AIRLINES 018 CANADIAN AIRLINES INT 020 LUFTHANSA 023 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. (CARGO) 027 ALASKA AIRLINES 029 LINEAS AER DEL CARIBE (CARGO) 034 MILLON AIR (CARGO) 037 USAIR 042 VARIG BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 043 DRAGONAIR 044 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 045 LAN-CHILE 046 LAV LINEA AERO VENEZOLANA 047 TAP AIR PORTUGAL 048 CYPRUS AIRWAYS 049 CRUZEIRO DO SUL 050 OLYMPIC AIRWAYS 051 LLOYD AEREO BOLIVIANO 053 AER LINGUS 055 ALITALIA 056 CYPRUS TURKISH AIRLINES 057 AIR FRANCE 058 INDIAN AIRLINES 060 FLIGHT WEST AIRLINES 061 AIR SEYCHELLES 062 DAN-AIR SERVICES 063 AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL 064 CSA CZECHOSLOVAK AIRLINES 065 SAUDI ARABIAN 066 NORONTAIR 067 AIR MOOREA 068 LAM-LINHAS AEREAS MOCAMBIQUE Page 2 of 19 Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 069 LAPA 070 SYRIAN ARAB AIRLINES 071 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 072 GULF AIR 073 IRAQI AIRWAYS 074 KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES 075 IBERIA 076 MIDDLE EAST AIRLINES 077 EGYPTAIR 078 AERO CALIFORNIA 079 PHILIPPINE AIRLINES 080 LOT POLISH AIRLINES 081 QANTAS AIRWAYS
    [Show full text]
  • Organizational Behavior with Job Performance
    Revised Pages Chapter Job 2 Performance ORGANIZATIONAL MECHANISMS Organizational Culture Organizational INDIVIDUAL Structure MECHANISMS Job GROUP Satisfaction MECHANISMS Leadership: INDIVIDUALINDIVIDUAL Styles & Behaviors Stress OUTCOMEOUTCOMESS Job Leadership: Performance Power & Influence Motivation Organizational Teams: Commitment Trust, Justice, Processes & Ethics Teams: Characteristics Learning & Decision-Making INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS Personality & Cultural Values Ability ccol30085_ch02_034-063.inddol30085_ch02_034-063.indd 3344 11/14/70/14/70 22:06:06:06:06 PPMM Revised Pages After growth made St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital the third largest health- care charity in the United States, the organization developed employee perfor- mance problems that it eventually traced to an inadequate rating and appraisal system. Hundreds of employ- ees gave input to help a consulting firm solve the problems. LEARNING GOALS After reading this chapter, you should be able to answer the following questions: 2.1 What is the defi nition of job performance? What are the three dimensions of job performance? 2.2 What is task performance? How do organizations identify the behaviors that underlie task performance? 2.3 What is citizenship behavior, and what are some specifi c examples of it? 2.4 What is counterproductive behavior, and what are some specifi c examples of it? 2.5 What workplace trends affect job performance in today’s organizations? 2.6 How can organizations use job performance information to manage employee performance? ST. JUDE CHILDREN’S RESEARCH HOSPITAL The next time you order a pizza from Domino’s, check the pizza box for a St. Jude Chil- dren’s Research Hospital logo. If you’re enjoying that pizza during a NASCAR race, look for Michael Waltrip’s #99 car, which Domino’s and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Crash Survivability and the Emergency Brace Position
    航空宇宙政策․法學會誌 第 33 卷 第 2 號 논문접수일 2018. 11. 30 2018년 12월 30일 발행, pp. 199~224 논문심사일 2018. 12. 14 http://dx.doi.org/10.31691/KASL33.2.6. 게재확정일 2018. 12. 30 Regulatory Aspects of Passenger and Crew Safety: Crash Survivability and the Emergency Brace Position Jan M. Davies* 46) CONTENTS Ⅰ. Introduction Ⅱ. Passenger and Crew Crash Survivability and the Emergency Brace Position Ⅲ. Regulations, and their Gaps, Relating to the Emergency Brace Position Ⅳ. Conclusions * Professor Jan M Davies MSc MD FRCPC FRAeS is a Professor of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine in the Cumming School of Medicine and an Adjunct Professor of Psychology in the Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary. She is the chair of IBRACE, the International Board for Research into Aircraft Crash Events. (https://en. wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Board_for_Research_into_Aircraft_Crash_Events) Amongst other publications, she is the co-author, with Linda Campbell, of An Investigation into Serial Deaths During Oral Surgery. In: Selby H (Ed) The Inquest Handbook, Leichardt, NSW, Australia: The Federation Press; 1998;150-169 and co-author with Drs. Keith Anderson, Christopher Pysyk and JN Armstrong of Anaesthesia. In: Freckelton I and Selby H (Eds). Expert Evidence. Thomson Reuters, Australia, 2017. E-Mail : [email protected] 200 航空宇宙政策․法學會誌 第 33 卷 第 2 號 Ⅰ. Introduction Barely more than a century has passed since the first passenger was carried by an aircraft. That individual was Henri Farman, an Anglo-French painter turned aviator. He was a passenger on a flight piloted by Léon Delagrange, a French sculptor turned aviator, and aircraft designer and manufacturer.
    [Show full text]
  • Avions Civils
    SOMMAIRE DU VOLUME I LA CONDUITE DES PROGRAMMES CIVILS AVANT-PROPOS ET REMERCIEMENTS........................................................................... 3 PREFACE.............................................................................................................................. 5 PRESENTATION GENERALE ............................................................................................. 9 CHAPITRE 1 PRESENTATION DE L’ACTIVITE...................................................................................... 11 LE MARCHE DU TRANSPORT AERIEN .................................................................................. 11 Le passager et l’évolution du trafic.......................................................................................... 11 Les compagnies et la flotte d’avions ....................................................................................... 13 LA CONSTRUCTION DES AVIONS CIVILS .............................................................................. 14 Les caractéristiques de l’activité.............................................................................................. 14 La compétition et son évolution............................................................................................... 18 La dimension économique et monétaire ................................................................................. 20 L’ ADMINISTRATION ET SES MISSIONS ................................................................................. 22 La tutelle militaire de
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007
    EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 1 Analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 EUROPEAN COMMISSION EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 2 Air Transport and Airport Research Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 German Aerospace Center Deutsches Zentrum German Aerospace für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Center in the Helmholtz-Association Air Transport and Airport Research December 2008 Linder Hoehe 51147 Cologne Germany Head: Prof. Dr. Johannes Reichmuth Authors: Erik Grunewald, Amir Ayazkhani, Dr. Peter Berster, Gregor Bischoff, Prof. Dr. Hansjochen Ehmer, Dr. Marc Gelhausen, Wolfgang Grimme, Michael Hepting, Hermann Keimel, Petra Kokus, Dr. Peter Meincke, Holger Pabst, Dr. Janina Scheelhaase web: http://www.dlr.de/fw Annual Report 2007 2008-12-02 Release: 2.2 Page 1 Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 Document Control Information Responsible project manager: DG Energy and Transport Project task: Annual analyses of the European air transport market 2007 EC contract number: TREN/05/MD/S07.74176 Release: 2.2 Save date: 2008-12-02 Total pages: 222 Change Log Release Date Changed Pages or Chapters Comments 1.2 2008-06-20 Final Report 2.0 2008-10-10 chapters 1,2,3 Final Report - full year 2007 draft 2.1 2008-11-20 chapters 1,2,3,5 Final updated Report 2.2 2008-12-02 all Layout items Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate-General for Energy and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract TREN/05/MD/S07.74176.
    [Show full text]
  • Urmatt Périscolaire - Urmatt C’Est Parti
    Edition de Molsheim / Schirmeck Mossig et Hasel DNA 21/06/2013 Urmatt Périscolaire - Urmatt C’est parti Instant officiel, le ruban a été coupé par les personnalités présentes. PHOTO DNA Samedi matin les locaux du nouveau périscolaire et de l’accueil de loisirs d’Urmatt ont été inaugurés. Le genre d’événement à l’occasion duquel on coupe un ruban tricolore. Mais au-delà du conformisme de la tradition, c’était surtout la fin heureuse d’un lourd dossier, le soulagement, et même l’émotion chez certains (certaines) d’être arrivé au bout d’un long parcours, qui ne fut pas sans obstacles… À l’origine, en 1999-2000, il y a eu la création de l’association Les P’tits Bouts de Chou, qui porte un projet de structure d’accueil parents-enfants, et un contrat « enfance », qui a pour partenaires les communes d’Urmatt et Niederhaslach, ainsi que la CAF. La structure est parentale, gérée par une équipe de bénévoles. Un important besoin de garde bien identifié Puis, l’idée de créer un accueil périscolaire émerge. Des enquêtes sont réalisées par des bénévoles, la CAF, le Département, et les assistantes maternelles sont approchés. Un important besoin de garde est bien identifié. Le maire d’Urmatt, Vincent Metzger, donne son accord à la poursuite du projet. En 2003, le conseil municipal verse une subvention pour la mise en place d’un accueil périscolaire méridien, et l’association Les P’tits Bouts de Chou se dote de nouveaux statuts et devient « Acti’Jeunes ». Oberhaslach rejoint le contrat enfance en 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (1988Kb)
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES SEC(92) 431 final Brussels, 19 March 1992 REPORT BY THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT on the evaluation of aid schemes established in favour of Community air carriers -- 1 - REPORT BY THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT on the evaluation of aid schemes established in favour of Community air carriers SUMMARY 1. The progressive developnent of the common aviation market has necessitated a comprehensive evaluatio~ of aid measures established in favour of Community air carriers. Therefore, all Member States have ·been asked to update the available information on existing aids. 2. The Commission•s services have carried out a careful assessment of the situation. This assessment has been based on the state aid rules of the Treaty and, in addition, on the evaluation criteria presented by the Commission in Annex IV of Memorandum N° 2 on the common air transport policy. 3. This report is given for information purposes only and does not preclude the results of any examinations the Commission will pursue on individual cases in accordance with Articles 92/93 of the Treaty. 4. The preliminary results of this work are that, as the information given by the Member States in a number of instances is presented in summarized form, it is not always possible for the Commission to arrive at definitive conclusions as to the compatibility of individual measures with the rules of the Treaty. On the basis of the additional information requested from the Member States concerned, the Commission intends to examine these cases in more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Aircraft and International Law: Chicago Opus 3'
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 66 | Issue 3 Article 2 2001 Military Aircraft nda International Law: Chicago Opus 3 Michel Bourbonniere Louis Haeck Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Michel Bourbonniere et al., Military Aircraft na d International Law: Chicago Opus 3, 66 J. Air L. & Com. 885 (2001) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol66/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. MILITARY AIRCRAFT AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: CHICAGO OPUS 3' MICHEL BOURBONNIERE Louis HAECK TABLE OF CONTENTS I. CIVIL AND MILITARY INTERFACE ............... 886 II. TREATY OF PARIS ................................ 889 III. CHICAGO CONVENTION AND MILITARY AIRCRAFT ......................................... 893 A. ARTICLE 3(B) ................................... 896 B. ARTICLE 3(D) ................................... 912 1. Content of Due Regard ....................... 912 a. Exegetical Analysis ..................... 914 b. Analysis of the Annexes to the Chicago Convention ............................ 916 c. Analysis of the ICAO Resolutions ...... 922 2. Application of Due Regard ................... 926 a. How is Due Regard Applied? .......... 926 b. Where is Due Regard Applied? ........ 927 c. Methods of Application of Due Regard ................................. 928 IV. CAA-CANADA LITIGATION ....................... 931 A. CAA ARGUMENTS ............................... 932 B. DEFENSE BY CANADA ............................ 934 C. COMMENTS ON THE ARGUMENTS OF CAA ....... 935 D. COMMENTS ON THE CANADIAN ARGUMENTS ..... 941 V. UNAUTHORIZED OVERFLIGHT ................. 946 VI. U.S. DOMESTIC LAW ............................. 948 1 The authors express their appreciation to the following individuals for sharing their thoughts on the subject of this note: ICAO Legal Bureau, Col.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft of Today. Aerospace Education I
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 068 287 SE 014 551 AUTHOR Sayler, D. S. TITLE Aircraft of Today. Aerospace EducationI. INSTITUTION Air Univ.,, Maxwell AFB, Ala. JuniorReserve Office Training Corps. SPONS AGENCY Department of Defense, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 71 NOTE 179p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS *Aerospace Education; *Aerospace Technology; Instruction; National Defense; *PhysicalSciences; *Resource Materials; Supplementary Textbooks; *Textbooks ABSTRACT This textbook gives a brief idea aboutthe modern aircraft used in defense and forcommercial purposes. Aerospace technology in its present form has developedalong certain basic principles of aerodynamic forces. Differentparts in an airplane have different functions to balance theaircraft in air, provide a thrust, and control the general mechanisms.Profusely illustrated descriptions provide a picture of whatkinds of aircraft are used for cargo, passenger travel, bombing, and supersonicflights. Propulsion principles and descriptions of differentkinds of engines are quite helpful. At the end of each chapter,new terminology is listed. The book is not available on the market andis to be used only in the Air Force ROTC program. (PS) SC AEROSPACE EDUCATION I U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO OUCH) EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG INATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIN 'IONS STATED 00 NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EOU CATION POSITION OR POLICY AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC MR,UNIVERS17/14AXWELL MR FORCEBASE, ALABAMA Aerospace Education I Aircraft of Today D. S. Sayler Academic Publications Division 3825th Support Group (Academic) AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC AIR UNIVERSITY MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, ALABAMA 2 1971 Thispublication has been reviewed and approvedby competent personnel of the preparing command in accordance with current directiveson doctrine, policy, essentiality, propriety, and quality.
    [Show full text]