Corallinales, Rhodophyta)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1995 Phylogenetic Implications of Sporogenesis Ultrastructure in the Genus Bossiella (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) Kimberly Joy Karnas College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Karnas, Kimberly Joy, "Phylogenetic Implications of Sporogenesis Ultrastructure in the Genus Bossiella (Corallinales, Rhodophyta)" (1995). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625968. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-v7h0-5t09 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PHYLOGENETIC IMPLICATIONS OF SPOROGENESIS ULTRASTRUCTURE IN THE GENUS BOSSIELLA (CORALLINALES, RHODOPHYTA) A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Biology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by K. Joy Karnas 1995 ProQuest Number: 10629426 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest, ProQuest 10629426 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 - 1346 APPROVAL SHEET This Thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Approved, June 19 95 os'eph L. Scott Stewart Ware DEDICATION For Claire, Tony, and Colleen Karnas and Anne Spychala. Without their love and support this would not have been possible. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................... v LIST OF TABLES AND DIAGRAMS.......................... vi LIST OF F I G URES......................................... vii ABSTRACT .............................................. viii INTRODUCTION ....................................... 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................. 16 RESULTS ............................................. 19 DISCUSSION ......................................... 36 REFERENCES ......................................... 57 KEY TO ABBRE VIATIO NS ................................. 67 VITA ....................................................102 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Dr. Joe Scott, my primary advisor, who patiently guided me through this and several other projects. Dr. Sharon Broadwater's skillful editing helped polish and focus my final product. Thanks also to Dr. Stewart Ware for rounding out my committee and offering helpful comments. Jewel Thomas provided outstanding technical support, and I could not have asked for more congenial and supportive lab mates than Liz LaPointe and Martha Agee. Last, but far from least, I would like to thank Brian Exton, whose love, support and dedication helped me keep my sanity. v LIST OF TABLES AND DIAGRAMS TABLE 1 CLASSIFICATION OF CORALLINACEAE .......... 63 TABLE 2 SPORANGIAL DEVELOPMENT IN BOSSIELLA .... 64 TABLE 3 SUBFAMILIES WITHIN FAMILY CORALLINACEAE . 65 vi LIST OF FIGURES 1-2 . Bossiella plumosa tetrasporophyte . 68 3-4 . Tetrasporangial conceptacle .......... 69 5-12 . Stage 1 tetrasporangia ................ 70 13-24 . Stage 3 tetrasporangia ................ 72 25-31. Stage 4 tetrasporangia ................ 75 32 . B. plumosa bisporophyte ................ 77 33-35. Bisporangial conceptacle .............. 77 36-38. Stage 1 bisporangia .................. 79 39-41. Stage 3 bisporangia .................. 80 42-44. Stage 4 bisporangia .................. 81 45-46. B. plumosa female thallus .............. 82 47-48. Carposporangial conceptacle .......... 83 49-52. Portion of the fusion cell ............ 84 53-55. Unfertilized carpogonia .............. 85 56 . Several developing carposporangia . 86 57 . Multinucleate gonimoblast cell ........ 86 58-61. Stage 1 carposporangia ................ 86 62-70. Stage 3 carposporangia ................ 88 71-73 . Stage 4 carposporangia ................ 91 74-75. B. californica tetrasporophyte ........ 92 76-77. Tetrasporangia inside a conceptacle . 93 78-81. Stage 3 tetrasporangia .............. 94 82-84 . Stage 4 mature tetrasporangia ........ 95 85-86. B . chiloensis carposporophyte .......... 96 87-88 . Carposporangial conceptacle .......... 97 89-90 . Several carposporangial cells ........ 98 91. Stage 1 carposporangia ................ 98 92-99. Stage 3 carposporangia ................ 99 100 . Stage 4 carposporangial periphery . 01 vii ABSTRACT Subfamilial classification within the red algal family Corallinaceae is currently undergoing much debate. Two competing classification schemes differ on primary emphasis. The traditional taxonomy relies on presence or absence of uncalcified regions called genicula, while the competing scheme accentuates secondary cell connections. Additional phylogenetic information is needed in order to resolve this issue. Since classical approaches to taxonomy have not been completely successful, researchers are turning to molecular and ultrastructural studies. This study used the corallinoidean species Bossiella plumosa to determine that diagnostic ultrastructural features of tetra-, bi-, and carposporogenesis are identical within the same species as well as among all the other three currently accepted species of the genus Bossiella. Although most aspects of sporogenesis are the same for all red algae, some features vary. Previous ultrastructural studies have suggested that accumulations of an electron dense material (EDM) in the nuclear region of developing tetrasporangia in coralline algae might have taxonomic significance. Two types of EDM perinuclear associations were found in the geniculate subfamily Corallinoideae. One form is also found in a nongeniculate genus in the subfamily Mastophoroideae. EDM associations are absent in both amphiroidean genera, one lithophyloidean species, and the problematic genus Hydrolithon (Mastophoroideae). The presence of EDM perinuclear associations seems to correlate with the presence of cell fusions and uniporate tetrasporangial conceptacles. This study suggests that ultrastructural features, especially perinuclear organelle associations, may assist in reorganizing the systematics of coralline red algae. PYLOGENETIC IMPLICATIONS OF SPOROGENESIS ULTRASTRUCTURE THE GENUS BOSSIELLA (CORALLINALES, RHODOPHYTA) INTRODUCTION The protistan phylum, Rhodophyta, encompasses a broad range of morphologically diverse eukaryotic organisms. They are characterized by the following: an absence of a flagellar apparatus in all stages of their life cycle; presence of phycoerythrin, phycocyanin, and allophycocyanins as accessory pigments on phycobilisomes (structures located on the outer faces of the thylakoids or photosynthetic lamellae) and; energy storage as floridean starch food reserves [oc-(1,4)-linked glucan] located outside of the chloroplasts in the cytoplasm. The Rhodophytan chloroplasts are also distinctive in that they have unstacked, evenly spaced thylakoids and, unlike all but the green algae, the chloroplasts lack a specialized, external sheath of endoplasmic reticulum. It is the combination of all of these features that makes the Rhodophyta unique (Woelkerling 1990, Garbary and Gabrielson 1990). Until recently (Garbary and Gabrielson 1990) Rhodophyta were divided into two subclasses, Bangiophycidae and Florideophycidae. While Florideophycidae appears to be monophyletic, Bangiophycidae is considered paraphyletic since they share no derived characteristics. Therefore, as a taxonomic alternative until inter- and infraordinal 2 relationships for the bangiophytes are resolved, one class, Rhodophyceae, is recognized (Garbary and Gabrielson 1990) . Characters that define each order and the ordinal interrelationships are much debated topics. This paper focuses on the order Corallinales, which is characterized by calcite embedded in its cell walls and pit plugs with no cap membrane and two cap layers, the outer one being "dome- shaped" (Gabrielson and Garbary 1986). In addition, all but two genera in the Corallinales have tetrasporangial conceptacles and simultaneous, zonate division of tetrasporangia (Silva and Johansen 1986) . These two genera have been placed in their own family, Sporolithaceae, while all other genera are in the Corallinaceae (Verheij 1993). Two morphologically distinct forms of corallines exist. Geniculate corallines contain a few to many intergenicula (calcified segments) separated by genicula (uncalcified regions). Nongeniculate genera, however, do not have uncalcified segments and most form thick or thin crusts that adhere to a substrate (Johansen 1981) . Since almost all of the Corallinaceae forms are thoroughly calcified, they are well established in the fossil record; approximately forty fossil genera have been described. The earliest nongeniculate forms date back as far as the Jurassic Period, while the earliest