River Dodder Catchment Flood Risk Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

River Dodder Catchment Flood Risk Management Plan RIVER DODDER CATCHMENT FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS REPORT OCTOBER 2008 River Dodder Catchment Flood Risk Assessment and Management Study Hydrological Analysis Report DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Client Dublin City Council Project Title River Dodder Catchment Flood Risk Assessment and Management Study Document Title Hydrological Analysis Report Document No. MDW0259Rp0016 No. of DCS TOC Text List of Tables List of Figures This Document Appendices Comprises 1 1 92 1 1 6 Rev. Status Author(s) Reviewed By Approved By Office of Origin Issue Date F01 Approval C. O’Donnell B. Elsaesser B. Elsaesser West Pier 31.10.08 River Dodder Catchment Flood Risk Management Plan Hydrological Analysis Report IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER – HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS Please read below the disclaimer, and limitations associated with this report to avoid incorrect interpretation of the information and data provided. DISCLAIMER Dublin City Council, South Dublin County Council, Dun Laoghaire and Rathdown County Council and The Office of Public Works make no representations, warranties or undertakings about any of the information provided in this report including, without limitation, on its accuracy, completeness, quality or fitness for any particular purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, neither the State, Dublin City Council, South Dublin County Council, Dun Laoghaire and Rathdown County Council nor The Office of Public Works nor any of their members, officers, associates, consultants, employees, affiliates, servants, agents or other representatives shall be liable for loss or damage arising out of, or in connection with, the use of, or the inability to use, the information provided in this report including, but not limited to, indirect or consequential loss or damages, loss of data, income, profit, or opportunity, loss of, or damage to, property and claims of third parties, even if Dublin City Council, South Dublin County Council, Dun Laoghaire and Rathdown County Council and The Office of Public Works has been advised of the possibility of such loss or damages, or such loss or damages were reasonably foreseeable. Dublin City Council, South Dublin County Council, Dun Laoghaire and Rathdown County Council and The Office of Public Works reserves the right to change the content and / or presentation of any of the information provided in this report at their sole discretion, including these notes and disclaimer. This disclaimer, guidance notes and conditions of use shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the Republic of Ireland. If any provision of these disclaimer, guidance notes and conditions of use shall be unlawful, void or for any reason unenforceable, that provision shall be deemed severable and shall not affect the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions. UNCERTAINTY Although great care and modern, widely-accepted methods have been used in the preparation of this report there is inevitably a range of inherent uncertainties and assumptions made during the estimation of design flows. These can arise due to: • a lack of recorded flood data at the specific location, • short periods of recorded flood flows where they have been recorded, • approximations in the hydrological analysis in representing physical reality, • assumptions in the hydrological analysis. BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION Hydrological and Hydrometric datasets are constantly changing and subsequently the statistical analysis of these datasets is only correct at the time of assessment. The Hydrological Analysis described in this report used the best available information at the time utilising best practice methodologies but it is acknowledged that new methodologies and/or recently recorded data could have a minor impact on the estimated design flows. However under the requirements of the Floods Directive (2007/60/EC), and its transposing legislation (SI 122 of 2010) into Irish law, this report will be reviewed every 6 years and changes to methodologies and/or datasets will be incorporated within a subsequent revised version. MDW0259Rp0016 i Rev F01 River Dodder Catchment Flood Risk Management Plan Hydrological Analysis Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 OBJECTIVES OF REPORT .................................................................................................. 1 2 CATCHMENT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 3 2.1 RIVER SYSTEM................................................................................................................. 3 2.1.1 Dodder Main Channel ...................................................................................... 3 2.1.2 Tallaght Stream: ............................................................................................... 4 2.1.3 Owendoher:...................................................................................................... 4 2.1.4 Whitechurch:..................................................................................................... 4 2.1.5 Little Dargle: ..................................................................................................... 4 2.1.6 Dundrum Slang: ............................................................................................... 4 2.1.7 Bohernabreena Reservoir System ................................................................... 4 2.2 WATER LEVEL GAUGING STATIONS................................................................................... 5 2.3 LAND USE DATA .............................................................................................................. 9 2.3.1 Current Development Scenario........................................................................ 9 2.3.2 Future Development Scenarios...................................................................... 11 2.3.3 Afforestation ................................................................................................... 12 2.3.4 Deforestation .................................................................................................. 13 2.3.5 Most Likely Future Development Scenario .................................................... 13 3 HYDROLOGICAL DATA ......................................................................................................... 14 3.1 METEOROLOGICAL DATA................................................................................................ 14 3.2 HYDROMETRIC DATA ...................................................................................................... 17 3.3 COASTAL DATA.............................................................................................................. 18 3.3.1 Joint Probability Assessment of Extreme Coastal and Fluvial Events........... 18 3.4 HISTORIC FLOODING DATA ............................................................................................. 20 3.4.1 River Dodder Main Channel........................................................................... 20 3.4.2 Tributaries....................................................................................................... 21 3.5 CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS........................................................................................ 23 3.5.1 Effect of Climate Change on Precipitation ..................................................... 23 3.5.2 Effect of Climate Change on Coastal Water Levels....................................... 28 4 METHODOLOGY.....................................................................................................................30 4.1 RATING CURVE ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 31 4.2 RAINFALL RUNOFF MODEL CONSTRUCTION & CALIBRATION............................................. 31 4.2.1 NAM Model..................................................................................................... 31 4.2.2 Urban Model................................................................................................... 34 4.2.3 MIKE Combined Model .................................................................................. 34 4.3 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 35 4.4 EXTREME VALUE ANALYSIS (EVA)................................................................................... 35 4.5 REGIONALISATION OF RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS .......................................................... 36 MDW0259Rp0016 ii Rev F01 River Dodder Catchment Flood Risk Management Plan Hydrological Analysis Report 4.6 COASTAL DATA.............................................................................................................. 36 4.7 SUMMARY OF METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................ 37 5 ANALYSIS OF HYDROMETRIC AND METEOROLOGICAL DATA...................................... 39 5.1 RATING CURVE ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 39 5.1.1 Rating Curve Check ....................................................................................... 39 5.1.2 Rating Curve Application...............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • ISFC Annual Report 1999
    1999 Salmon, Sea Trout . 3 Location Map for Awards Presentation in Doyle Burlington Brown Trout (Lake) . 4 Brown Trout (River) . 5 Bream . 6 Pike (Lake), Pike (River) . 8 Carp . 10 Eel, Roach/Bream Hybrid . 11 Rudd/Bream Hybrid, Perch . .12 Tench . 13 Bass . 14 Coalfish, Cod, Conger Eel, Dab, Greater Spotted Dogfish . 15 Lesser Spotted Dogfish, Spur Dogfish . 16 Flounder, Garfish, Grey Gurnard . 17 Red Gurnard, Tub Gurnard, Ling . 18 Mackerel . 19 Grey Mullet, Plaice . 20 ONTENTS Pollack, Pouting . 21 Blonde Ray, Homelyn Ray, Painted Ray . 22 Sting Ray, Three Bearded Rockling, Twaite Shad . 24 C Blue Shark . 25 Tope, Torsk, Ballan Wrasse, Cuckoo Wrasse . 26 New Records, Ten Species Award, Ten Pin Awards, Special Award for Juveniles, The Minister’s Award, . .27 Revised Specimen Weight/New Class, Special Notice, Limitation on Number of Claims, Exclusion from Specimen Status, Weighing of Fish, Metrification . 28 Common Skate, Captors Addresses, Distribution of Specimen Awards . .29 Acknowledgements, Presentation of Awards 1998, Fund Raising . 30 Accounts, Donations . 31 Use of the information contained in this report for press articles Balance Sheet . 32 and publicity is encouraged. It may be quoted without charge, Irish Record Fish Listing . 33 provided the source is acknowledged. Schedule of Specimen Weights (Revised) . 35 The report is copyright and prior permission to reproduce the Rules . 37 data for any other purpose other than reasonable review or Weighing Scale Certification – List of Centres . .40 analysis must be obtained in writing from the Irish Specimen Fish “Read it Carefully” by Des Brennan . 42 Committee. “Maybe we’ll stay at home this year!” by Derek Evans .
    [Show full text]
  • Update on River Dodder Greenway RPS Group Have Recently Been
    Update on River Dodder Greenway RPS Group have recently been appointed by Dublin City Council to carry out the options development, preliminary design and the statutory planning process for a 7.5km section of the River Dodder Greenway, from Sir John Rogerson’s Quay at Forbes Street to the boundary with South County Dublin at Orwell Park. The overall route is referred to as the River Dodder Greenway – From the Sea to the Mountains in the initial feasibility study carried out by ROD/AECOM in 2012, which runs from the quays to the foot of the Dublin Mountains at Bohernabreena. The greenway forms Route S03 under the Greater Dublin Area Cycle Network Plan, which is classed as both Dublin Primary and Greenway under this plan. This section of the route will run mostly along the banks of the River Dodder, from its mouth at Grand Canal Dock, through Ringsend, Lansdowne, Ballsbridge, Donnybrook, Clonskeagh, Milltown, Dartry, Churchtown and Rathfarnham, then joining with the section through South County Dublin which has recently been through planning. The route will cross into Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown in the vicinity of Clonskeagh, Milltown and Churchtown. It is intended that the route will utilise the various parks along the corridor, including Herbert Park, Dartry Park, Orwell Park, and the linear parks between Clonskeagh and Milltown. The general principle of the scheme is to provide an attractive leisure and commuter cycle route that would be on par with other routes of its kind in Europe. To achieve this a holistic design approach has to be exercised, taking into account not only journey times and comfort of cyclists but also various other aspects including but not limited to, consideration of pedestrians and local walkers, impact on flora and fauna, benefiting local communities through enhancing existing and providing new amenities, increasing accessibility to and providing good connectivity between local businesses, village centres, and other cycle paths.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Development Plan 2004-2010
    South Dublin County Council South Dublin County Council Draft Development Plan 2004-2010 Draft Development Plan Written Statement South Dublin County Council South Dublin County Council Draft Development Plan 2004-2010 Draft Development Plan Written Statement Máire Ardagh Mayor Joe Horan County Manager Kieran Kennedy Director of Planning Michael Kenny November 2003 Senior Planner South Dublin County Council Comhairle Chontae Átha Cliath Theas The Council of an Administrative County consists of a Mayor and Councillors. South Dublin has a total of 26 Councillors who are elected from 5 electoral areas – Clondalkin, Lucan, Tallaght Central, Tallaght South and Terenure/Rathfarnham. County Council Members November 2003 Clondalkin Electoral Area Robert Dowds Labour Colm McGrath Independent Sheila O’Brien Fianna Fáil Thérèse Ridge Fine Gael Colm Tyndall Progressive Democrats Lucan Electoral Area Deirdre Doherty-Ryan Fianna Fáil Derek Keating Independent Fintan McCarthy Green Eamonn Tuffy Labour Tallaght Central Electoral Area Mark Daly Sinn Féin Eamonn Maloney Labour Paul Ringland Fine Gael Roderick Smyth Fianna Fáil Don Tipping Labour Tallaght South Electoral Area Mick Billane Fianna Fáil Jim Daly Fianna Fáil John Hannon Fianna Fáil Cathal King Sinn Féin Denis Mackin Labour Terenure/Rathfarnham Electoral Area Máire Ardagh, Mayor, Fianna Fáil Cáit Keane Progressive Democrats John Lahart Fianna Fáil Stanley Laing, Deputy Mayor, Fine Gael Meg Murphy Independent Ann Ormonde, Senator, Fianna Fáil Eamonn Walsh Labour Acknowledgements This Draft Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 103, the Irish Bat Monitoring Programme
    N A T I O N A L P A R K S A N D W I L D L I F E S ERVICE THE IRISH BAT MONITORING PROGRAMME 2015-2017 Tina Aughney, Niamh Roche and Steve Langton I R I S H W I L D L I F E M ANUAL S 103 Front cover, small photographs from top row: Coastal heath, Howth Head, Co. Dublin, Maurice Eakin; Red Squirrel Sciurus vulgaris, Eddie Dunne, NPWS Image Library; Marsh Fritillary Euphydryas aurinia, Brian Nelson; Puffin Fratercula arctica, Mike Brown, NPWS Image Library; Long Range and Upper Lake, Killarney National Park, NPWS Image Library; Limestone pavement, Bricklieve Mountains, Co. Sligo, Andy Bleasdale; Meadow Saffron Colchicum autumnale, Lorcan Scott; Barn Owl Tyto alba, Mike Brown, NPWS Image Library; A deep water fly trap anemone Phelliactis sp., Yvonne Leahy; Violet Crystalwort Riccia huebeneriana, Robert Thompson. Main photograph: Soprano Pipistrelle Pipistrellus pygmaeus, Tina Aughney. The Irish Bat Monitoring Programme 2015-2017 Tina Aughney, Niamh Roche and Steve Langton Keywords: Bats, Monitoring, Indicators, Population trends, Survey methods. Citation: Aughney, T., Roche, N. & Langton, S. (2018) The Irish Bat Monitoring Programme 2015-2017. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 103. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland The NPWS Project Officer for this report was: Dr Ferdia Marnell; [email protected] Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: David Tierney, Brian Nelson & Áine O Connor ISSN 1393 – 6670 An tSeirbhís Páirceanna Náisiúnta agus Fiadhúlra 2018 National Parks and Wildlife Service 2018 An Roinn Cultúir, Oidhreachta agus Gaeltachta, 90 Sráid an Rí Thuaidh, Margadh na Feirme, Baile Átha Cliath 7, D07N7CV Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, 90 North King Street, Smithfield, Dublin 7, D07 N7CV Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SEA Constraints Report D01
    Eastern CFRAM Study Strategic Environmental Assessment Constraints Report IBE0600Rp0035 rpsgroup.com/ireland rpsgroup.com/ireland Eastern CFRAM Study Strategic Environmental Assessment Constraints Report DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Client OPW Project Title Eastern CFRAM Study Document Title IBE0600Rp0035_E_SEA_Constraints_Report_D01 Document No. IBE0600Rp0035 DCS TOC Text List of Tables List of Figures No. of This Document Appendices Comprises 1 1 53 1 1 1 Rev. Status Author(s) Reviewed By Approved By Office of Origin Issue Date D01 Draft R. Bingham K. Smart G. Glasgow Belfast 27/08/2015 S. Mathews rpsgroup.com/ireland Copyright Copyright - Office of Public Works. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from the Office of Public Works. Legal Disclaimer This report is subject to the limitations and warranties contained in the contract between the commissioning party (Office of Public Works) and RPS Group Ireland rpsgroup.com/ireland Eastern CFRAM Study Constraints Report - DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 KEY PLAN ELEMENTS TO BE ASSESSED ............................................................................ 2 3 KEY ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES TO BE EXAMINED ............................................................. 4 4 OVERVIEW OF POLICY CONTEXT ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • River Dodder Greenway from the Sea to the Mountains
    River Dodder Greenway From the Sea to the Mountains Feasibility Study Report January 2013 Client: Consulting Engineer: South Dublin County Council Roughan & O'Donovan Civic Offices Arena House Tallaght Arena Road Dublin 24 Sandyford Dublin 18 Roughan & O'Donovan - AECOM Alliance River Dodder Greenway Consulting Engineers Feasibility Study Report River Dodder Greenway From the Sea to the Mountains Feasibility Study Report Document No: ............. 12.176.10 FSR Made: ........................... Eoin O Catháin (EOC) Checked: ...................... Seamus MacGearailt (SMG) Approved: .................... Revision Description Made Checked Approved Date Feasibility Study Report DRAFT EOC SMG November 2012 A (Implementation and Costs included) DRAFT 2 EOC SMG January 2013 B Issue 1 EOC SMG SMG January 2013 Ref: 12.176.10FSR January 2013 Page i Roughan & O'Donovan - AECOM Alliance River Dodder Greenway Consulting Engineers Feasibility Study Report River Dodder Greenway From the Sea to the Mountains Feasibility Study Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Background / Planning Context .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study Final Strategy Report ______
    Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study Final Strategy Report __________________________________________________________________________________________ Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study Final Strategy Report Document Title Final Strategy Report Volume 1 – Main Report Volume 2 – Appendices Document Ref (s): GDSDS/NE02057/035C Date Edition/Rev Status Originator Checked Approved 28/05/04 A Draft N Fleming J Grant M Hand M Edger C O’Keeffe 06/08/2004 B Draft N Fleming J Grant M Hand M Edger C O’Keeffe 27/04/2005 C Final N Fleming J Grant M Hand M Edger C O’Keeffe Contracting Authority (CA) Personnel Council Area Council Name Operations Manager Office Location Project Engineer Name Telephone No. Operations Manager Name Telephone No. This report has been prepared for the Contracting Authority in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment for the Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study dated 23rd May 2001. The McCarthy Hyder MCOS Joint Venture cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ GDSDS/NEO2057/035C April 2005 Greater Dublin Strategic Drainage Study Final Strategy Report __________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................6 1.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Report No. 268
    Report No. 268 FloodWarnTech Synthesis Report: Flood Warning Technologies for Ireland Authors: Michael Bruen and Mawuli Dzakpasu www.epa.ie ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Monitoring, Analysing and Reporting on the The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for Environment protecting and improving the environment as a valuable asset • Monitoring air quality and implementing the EU Clean Air for for the people of Ireland. We are committed to protecting people Europe (CAFÉ) Directive. and the environment from the harmful effects of radiation and • Independent reporting to inform decision making by national pollution. and local government (e.g. periodic reporting on the State of Ireland’s Environment and Indicator Reports). The work of the EPA can be divided into three main areas: Regulating Ireland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Preparing Ireland’s greenhouse gas inventories and projections. Regulation: We implement effective regulation and environmental • Implementing the Emissions Trading Directive, for over 100 of compliance systems to deliver good environmental outcomes and the largest producers of carbon dioxide in Ireland. target those who don’t comply. Knowledge: We provide high quality, targeted and timely Environmental Research and Development environmental data, information and assessment to inform • Funding environmental research to identify pressures, inform decision making at all levels. policy and provide solutions in the areas of climate, water and sustainability. Advocacy: We work with others to advocate for a clean, productive and well protected environment and for sustainable Strategic Environmental Assessment environmental behaviour. • Assessing the impact of proposed plans and programmes on the Irish environment (e.g. major development plans). Our Responsibilities Radiological Protection Licensing • Monitoring radiation levels, assessing exposure of people in We regulate the following activities so that they do not endanger Ireland to ionising radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspector's Report ABP-307746-20
    Inspector’s Report ABP-307746-20 Development Flood alleviation works along a section of Whitechurch stream. Location Whitechurch Road, Rathfarnham, Dublin 16 Local Authority South Dublin County Council Type of Application Application for approval made under Section 177(AE) of the Planning and Development Act, 2000 (local authority development requiring appropriate assessment) Prescribed Bodies DCH&G IFI An Taisce Observer(s) South Dublin Conservation Society Ballyboden Tidy Towns Group Environment Trust Ireland Cllr Yvonne Collins ABP-307746-20 Inspector’s Report Page 1 of 44 Roisin Mc Aleer & Laure Duez Brid Reason Joan Moloney Susan F Tollemache Angela O’Donoghue Ciaran Ahern & Others Manuel Doyle Date of Site Inspection 9th October 2020 Inspector Karla Mc Bride ABP-307746-20 Inspector’s Report Page 2 of 44 1.0 Introduction South Dublin County Council is seeking approval from An Bord Pleanála to undertake flood alleviation works along a section of the Whitechurch Stream between St Enda’s Park and its confluence with the Owendoher River at Ballyboden Road. This watercourse drains to the Dodder River which ultimately discharges to Dublin Bay that is covered by several European site designations. There are several other designated European sites in the wider area although most do not have a direct connection to the proposed works. A Natura Impact Statement (NIS) and application under Section 177AE was lodged by the Local Authority on the basis of the proposed development’s likely significant effect on a European site. Section 177AE of the Planning and Development act 2000 (as amended) requires that where an appropriate assessment is required in respect of development by a local authority the authority shall prepare an NIS and the development shall not be carried out unless the Board has approved the development with or without modifications.
    [Show full text]
  • ERBD Dodder 2018-2
    Fish in Rivers Factsheet ERBD River Dodder Catchment Factsheet: 2018/2 The River Dodder catchment is located in the Eastern The River Dodder becomes a very urban channel from River Basin District and covers an area of Oldbawn downstream. The most upper parts of this approximately 113km2. The River Dodder flows in a catchment, including the Glenasmole Reservoirs and north easterly direction through south Co. Dublin, their feeder streams fall within the Wicklow reaching the River Liffey at Grand Canal Dock in Dublin Mountains Special Area of Conservation. city. The geology of this catchment is mixed between Nine sites were surveyed on the Dodder River granite, limestone and slate. This catchment consists catchment between the 12th of July and 5th of mainly of scrubland in the upper catchment, with September 2018. agriculture lower down towards the two reservoirs. The Dodder River at Bohernabreena, Co. Dublin (site 2) 1 ERBD River Dodder Catchment Factsheet: 2018/2 Fig 1. Map of River Dodder Catchment survey sites, 2018 Site survey details, River Dodder, 2018 No. River Site Method WFD Date 1 Dodder, River d/s of Lower Reservoir TEF (Handset) - 05/09/2018 2 Dodder, River Bohernabreena ADEF (Handset) - 05/09/2017 3 Dodder, River Friarstown TEF (Handset) - 05/09/2018 4 Dodder, River Oldbawn TEF (Handset) - 12/07/2018 5 Dodder, River Firhouse TEF (Handset) - 12/07/2018 6 Dodder, River Knocklyon TEF (Handset) - 05/09/2018 7 Dodder, River Templeogue car park TEF (Handset) - 05/09/2018 8 Dodder, River Bushy Park TEF (Handset) - 12/07/2018 9 Dodder, River Mount Carmel Hospital TEF (Handset) - 12/07/2018 TEF (Ten-minute electrofishing), ADEF (Area delimited electro-fishing) 2 ERBD River Dodder Catchment Factsheet: 2018/2 Minimum density estimates (no.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Part Ii
    RIVER PODDLE FLOOD ALLEVIATION SCHEME ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT VOLUME 2 – MAIN REPORT PART II - ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES (CHAPTERS 6-17) FEBRUARY 2020 River Poddle Flood Alleviation Scheme EIAR Main Report, Part II List of Contents 6 POPULATION AND HUMAN HEALTH .......................................................... 6-1 6.1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Methodology.......................................................................................... 6-1 6.3 Existing Environment .............................................................................. 6-1 6.4 Potential Impacts ................................................................................... 6-6 6.5 Mitigation Measures ............................................................................... 6-8 6.6 Residual Impacts ................................................................................... 6-9 SOILS, GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY ................................................... 9-1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 9-1 Statement of Authority ........................................................................... 9-1 Methodology.......................................................................................... 9-1 Existing Environmental Conditions ............................................................ 9-1 Potential Impacts
    [Show full text]
  • Knitted Flood Wall Initiating Political Entanglement Through a Socially Engaged Participatory Art Project Martina O’Brien Martinaobrien.Com
    Knitted Flood Wall Initiating Political Entanglement through a Socially Engaged Participatory Art Project Martina O’Brien martinaobrien.com 102 Counter-Cartographies Tie Networks The Knitted Flood Wall, 2012, was a socially engaged participa- tions with residents; the act of situating wool – with its soft nature tory art project initiated by Irish Visual Artist Martina O'Brien – outside in a concrete space seemed a fitting gesture. In addition in collaboration with The Ballsbridge Dodder Residents Asso- to this, the aspect of comfort associated with yarn seemed to add ciation, Dublin. It was founded in the aftermath of the flooding to its suitability. of the River Dodder, Dublin, Ireland, 24 October 2011. The pro- ject witnessed the creation of a 45 feet long x 8 feet wide (13.7 x From the outset, she had a number of aims and objectives for the 2.4m) knitted replica floodwall which visually mapped the river's art project; firstly, it had to articulate the need for an immediate in- velocity flow and took participants six months to complete. This stallation of a flood defence wall. Secondly, it was to be a genuine- collaboration explored how art within the public realm can give ly collaborative and participatory project involving residents who a society a voice, how it can be utilized as an accessible language had been directly affected by the flood. Thirdly, it was to enable a in which to mediate awareness of an issue, how it can act to gain dialogue and a stronger bond within the community. She was also political engagement and how it can create disaster risk reduction interested in the importance of a participatory project from a psy- by pre-emption and anticipatory action.
    [Show full text]