DOCSLIB.ORG

US 2010/0236137 A1 Wu Et Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

US 2010.0236137A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0236137 A1 Wu et al. (43) Pub. Date: Sep. 23, 2010 (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING (60) Provisional application No. 61/099,503, filed on Sep. ECOSAPIENTAENOIC ACID AND 23, 2008. DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACID FROMALGAE Publication Classification (75) Inventors: Benjamin Chiau-pin Wu, San Ramon, CA (US); David Stephen, (51) Int. Cl. Davis, CA (US); Gaye Elizabeth CI2P 7/64 (2006.01) Morgenthaler, Woodside, CA CIIB I/O (2006.01) (US); David Vancott Jones, CIOL L/88 (2006.01) Woodside, CA (US) AOIK 6L/00 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. ................... 44/385:554/8: 435/134: 554/1; Correspondence Address: 119/215 JONES DAY 222 EAST 41ST ST (57) ABSTRACT NEW YORK, NY 10017 (US) Provided herein are systems and methods for producing (73) Assignee: LiveFuels, Inc., San Carlos, CA eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (US) (DHA) and/or derivatives and/or mixtures thereof by growing algae that produce the oils containing EPA and/or DHA and/ (21) Appl. No.: 12/731,024 or derivatives and/or mixtures thereof, harvesting the algae with fish in one or more enclosed systems, and then process (22) Filed: Mar. 24, 2010 ing fish to separate and purify the EPA and/or DHA. The multi-trophic systems provided herein comprise at least one Related U.S. Application Data enclosure that contains the algae and the fishes, and means for (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 12/565,612, controllably feeding the algae to the fishes. Also provided filed on Sep. 23, 2009. herein are the lipid compositions extracted from the fishes. CO2 Source 2OO 250 -- O o Algae 2f1 O o Algae \ O (222 Algae Enclosure Passageway Fish Enclosure 210 240 220 1 - 221 N. Cl3 Fish Gathering Device 270 Nutrient Source 260 Fish Conveyor 280 Fish Processing Plant 300 Lipid Separator 400 Grid Purifier Patent Application Publication Sep. 23, 2010 Sheet 1 of 3 US 2010/0236137 A1 CO2 Source 2OO 250 O o Algae ? 211 O o Algae \ sts to O (222 Algae Enclosure Passageway Fish Enclosure 210 240 220 C 1- St. 9-) 221 N. C Fish Gathering Device 270 Nutrient Source 260 Fish Conveyor 280 Fish Processing Plant 300 Lipid Separator 400 FIG. 1 Ond Purifier Patent Application Publication Sep. 23, 2010 Sheet 2 of 3 US 2010/0236137 A1 FIG 2 Patent Application Publication Sep. 23, 2010 Sheet 3 of 3 US 2010/0236137 A1 S S. C120 methyl laurate C140 methyl myristate C141 methyl myrtistoleate (cis-9) C150 methyl pentadecanoate C15:1 methyl pentadecinoate (cis-10) C160 methyl palmitate C16. 1 methyl palmitoleate (cis-9) C170 methyl heptadecanoate C171 methyl heptadecenoate (cis-10) C180 methyl stearate C18.1 methyl oleate (cis-9) C18.2 methyl linoleate (cis-9,12) C18. J methyl y-linolenate (cis-6,912) C18J methyl ?inolenate (cis-9,12,15) C18.4 methyl Stearidonate (cis-69, 1215) C200 methyl arachidate C20:1 methyl eicosenoate C20:2 methyl eicosadienoate (cis-11, 14) C20 J methyl eicosatrienoote (cis-8,11,14) C21:0 methyl heneicosanoate C20 J methyl eicosatrienoate (cis-11, 14, 17) C20: 4 methyl arachidonate (cis-5,8,11,14) C205 methyl eicosapentanoate (cis-5,8,11,14, 17) C220 methyl behenate C22:1 methyl erucate (cis-13) C222 methyl decoSadienoate (cis-13,16) C230 methyl tricosanoate C240 methyl lignocerate C226 methyl docosahexaenoate (cis 4,7,10,13,16, 19) FIG 3 US 2010/0236137 A1 Sep. 23, 2010 SYSTEMIS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING While still being studied, many experts believe that EPA and ECOSAPIENTAENOIC ACID AND DHA encourage the production of body chemicals that help DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACID FROMALGAE control inflammation. 0004. The most widely available source of EPA and DHA is oily fish Such as Salmon, herring, mackerel, anchovies, and 0001. This application is a continuation-in-part applica sardines. Fish oil supplements containing EPA and DHA are tion of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/565,612, filed Sep. 23, often made from pelagic oily fish like menhaden, Sardines, 2009, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Applica and anchovies. Alarmingly, these fish resources are disap tion No. 61/099,503, filed Sep. 23, 2008, each of which is pearing at a rapid pace. Leading researcher, Boris Worm, incorporated by reference in its entirety. predicts that 90% of fish and shellfish used to feed people worldwide may be gone by 2048 with present trends. The 1. INTRODUCTION global production of fish oil and fishmeal has reached a pla teau over the past few years. Present methods to manufacture 0002 Provided herein are systems and methods for pro EPA and DHA through fermentation biotechnological pro ducing lipid compositions containing eicosapentaenoic acid cesses have steadily improved, but remain too costly for most (EPA) and/or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and/or deriva applications, except as an additive to high-priced infant for tives and/or mixtures thereof by growing algae that produce mula. A new source of inexpensive EPA and DHA is critically those oils, harvesting the algae with fish, and then processing needed. fish to separate and purify the EPA and/or DHA. 2. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 3. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 0003. In the early 1980s, the Inuit were found to have 0005 Provided herein are inexpensive and energy-effi unusually low rates of heart disease despite their high-fat diet cient methods and systems for producing EPA and/or DHA rich in fish. Researchers later showed that it was the omega-3 from algae. As used herein the term “EPA refers to eicosa fatty acids that provided the beneficial effects, specifically the pentaenoate, eicosapentaenoic acid, and/or derivatives marine-derived eicosapentaenoic acid, C20:5n-3 (EPA) and thereof including, but not limited to esters, glycerides, phos docosahexaenoic acid, C22:6n-3 (DHA). In addition to ben pholipids, sterols, and/or mixtures thereof. As used herein the eficial effects on cardiovascular disease, EPA and DHA have term “eicosapentaenoate' refers to all-cis-5,8,11,14, 17 since been linked to beneficial effects on arthritis, sleep dis eicosapentaenoate (Formula 1). Formula 1-eicosapentaenoate orders, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, heart arrhyth 0006. As used herein the term “eicosapentaenoic acid mias, coronary heart disease, insomnia, depression, anorexia, refers to an eicosapentaenoate moiety in acid form, or all-cis Schizophrenia, hypertension, and attention deficit hyperactiv 5,8,11,14, 17-eicosapentaenoic acid (Formula 2). Formula 2-eicosapentaenoic acid HO ity disorder (ADHD). It is estimated that 84,000 deaths annu 0007 EPA in fish oil is commonly found as ethyl eicosa ally are attributable to insufficient dietary omega-3 fatty pentaenoate (Formula 3), but EPA is also found in lipids such acids. Danaei, G. et al., 2009, PLoS Medicine 6(4): 1-23. as acylglycerides, phospholipids, and waxy esters. US 2010/0236137 A1 Sep. 23, 2010 Formula 3-ethyl eicosapentaenoate 0008. As used herein the term “DHA refers to docosa 0012. In certain embodiments, provided herein are meth hexaenoate, docosahexaenoic acid, and/or derivatives thereof ods for producing an EPA and/or DHA-containing oil, said including, but not limited to esters, glycerides, phospholipids, method comprising: sterols, and/or mixtures thereof. As used herein the term 0013 (i) growing one or more algae species that produce "docosahexaenoate' refers to all-cis-4,7,10,13,16,19 EPA and/or DHA in a first enclosed-container system or docosahexaenoate (Formula 4). open-pond system; Formula 4-DHA 0009. As used herein the term “docosahexaenoic acid” 0014 (ii) harvesting said algae, comprising controllably refers to a docosahexaenoate moiety in acid form, or all-cis feeding said algae to one or more Zooplankton and/or fish 4,7,10,13,16,19-docosahexaenoic acid (Formula 5). species that feed on said algae in said first enclosed-container Formula 5-docosahexaenoic acid 0010 DHA in fish oil is commonly found as ethyl docosa system or open-pond system, or in a second enclosed-con hexaenoate (Formula 6), but DHA is also found in lipids such tainer system or open-pond system, wherein said fish species as acylglycerides, phospholipids, and waxy esters. feed on said algae and/or Zooplankton; and Formula 6-ethyl docosahexaenoate 0011. In certain embodiments, provided herein are meth 00.15 (iii) extracting EPA- and/or DHA-containing lipids ods that comprise cultivating autotrophic EPA- and/or DHA from the fish, wherein said EPA- and/or DHA-containing producing algae ("EPA and/or DHA algae'), harvesting them lipids are processed to concentrate and purify EPA and/or with filter-feeding organisms such as fish, and then convert DHA ing the fish to EPA- and/or DHA-containing oils and fishmeal using conventional reduction industry practices. In certain 0016. In one embodiment, the growing step and the har embodiments, methods provided herein avoid standard algae vesting step are carried out simultaneously in said first dewatering and drying steps, which can be expensive interms enclosed-container system or open-pond system. In one of capital and energy. These steps typically require centrifu embodiment, the growing step and the harvesting step are gation and oil extraction with organic solvents. In certain carried out Successively in said first enclosed-container sys embodiments, the methods can further comprise providing a tem or open-pond system and said second enclosed-container multi-trophic system wherein the algae are controllably fed to system or open-pond system, respectively. the fish, while the fish is growing from fry to juvenile, from 0017. In certain embodiments, the harvesting step com juvenile to adult, from fry to adult, or growing adult to larger prises transferring a portion of a population of the fish or the sizes or grow-out.
Recommended publications
  • 15. Fish Diversity of Triyuga River

    15. Fish Diversity of Triyuga River

    OurShrestha Nature / Our│December Nature (2016), 2016 │ 1414 (1):(1): 124-134 124-134 ISSN: 1991-2951 (Print) ISSN: 2091-2781 (Online) Our Nature Journal homepage: http://nepjol.info/index.php/ON Fish diversity of Triyuga River, Udayapur District, Nepal Jay Narayan Shrestha Department of Zoology, Post Graduate Campus, Biratnagar, Tribhuvan University, Nepal E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The present paper deals with a synopsis of 48 fish species under 35 genera belonging to 17 families and 6 orders from Triyuga River. Some interesting fish species reported from this river are Barilus shacra, Garra annandalei, Psilorhynchoides pseudecheneis, Badis badis, Olyra longicoudata, Tor putitora, Labeo dero and Anguilla bengalensis . Fish diversity of Triyuga river is rich, thus further extensive study is essential for their conservation. Key words : Barilus shacra , Fish, Fattehpur, Mahabharat hill DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/on.v14i1.16452 Manuscript details: Received: 28.08.2016 / Accepted: 25.11.2016 Citation: Shrestha, J.N. 2016. Fish diversity of Triyuga River, Udayapur District, Nepal . Our Nature 14(1) :124-134. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/on.v14i1.16452 Copyright: © Shrestha 2016. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Introduction Initially two small streams, in the form of Udayapur district (26 o39'-27 o22'N and drainage of the lake, take their form from 86 o9'-87 o10'E) is located in the eastern de- two separate spots of the lake and both of velopment region of Nepal. It is bounded them run down towards the south slope by nine districts,Dhankuta and Sunsari in then confluence and become the river Tri- the east, Saptari and Siraha in the south, yuga.
  • Molecular Systematics of Western North American Cyprinids (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae)

    Molecular Systematics of Western North American Cyprinids (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae)

    Zootaxa 3586: 281–303 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0EFA9728-D4BB-467E-A0E0-0DA89E7E30AD Molecular systematics of western North American cyprinids (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) SUSANA SCHÖNHUTH 1, DENNIS K. SHIOZAWA 2, THOMAS E. DOWLING 3 & RICHARD L. MAYDEN 1 1 Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, 3507 Laclede Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. E-mail S.S: [email protected] ; E-mail RLM: [email protected] 2 Department of Biology and Curator of Fishes, Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3 School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The phylogenetic or evolutionary relationships of species of Cypriniformes, as well as their classification, is in a era of flux. For the first time ever, the Order, and constituent Families are being examined for relationships within a phylogenetic context. Relevant findings as to sister-group relationships are largely being inferred from analyses of both mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Like the vast majority of Cypriniformes, due to an overall lack of any phylogenetic investigation of these fishes since Hennig’s transformation of the discipline, changes in hypotheses of relationships and a natural classification of the species should not be of surprise to anyone. Basically, for most taxa no properly supported phylogenetic hypothesis has ever been done; and this includes relationships with reasonable taxon and character sampling of even families and subfamilies.
  • Ichthyofaunal Diversity and Conservation Status in Rivers of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

    Ichthyofaunal Diversity and Conservation Status in Rivers of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

    Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 10(4): 131-143 Article Ichthyofaunal diversity and conservation status in rivers of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan Mukhtiar Ahmad1, Abbas Hussain Shah2, Zahid Maqbool1, Awais Khalid3, Khalid Rasheed Khan2, 2 Muhammad Farooq 1Department of Zoology, Govt. Post Graduate College, Mansehra, Pakistan 2Department of Botany, Govt. Post Graduate College, Mansehra, Pakistan 3Department of Zoology, Govt. Degree College, Oghi, Pakistan E-mail: [email protected] Received 12 August 2020; Accepted 20 September 2020; Published 1 December 2020 Abstract Ichthyofaunal composition is the most important and essential biotic component of an aquatic ecosystem. There is worldwide distribution of fresh water fishes. Pakistan is blessed with a diversity of fishes owing to streams, rivers, dams and ocean. In freshwater bodies of the country about 193 fish species were recorded. There are about 30 species of fish which are commercially exploited for good source of proteins and vitamins. The fish marketing has great socio economic value in the country. Unfortunately, fish fauna is declining at alarming rate due to water pollution, over fishing, pesticide use and other anthropogenic activities. Therefore, about 20 percent of fish population is threatened as endangered or extinct. All Mashers are ‘endangered’, notably Tor putitora, which is also included in the Red List Category of International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as Endangered. Mashers (Tor species) are distributed in Southeast Asian and Himalayan regions including trans-Himalayan countries like Pakistan and India. The heavy flood of July, 2010 resulted in the minimizing of Tor putitora species Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and the fish is now found extinct from river Swat.
  • Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of the Critically Endangered Freshwater Fish Species, the Clanwilliam Sandfish (Labeo Seeberi)

    Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of the Critically Endangered Freshwater Fish Species, the Clanwilliam Sandfish (Labeo Seeberi)

    Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of the critically endangered freshwater fish species, the Clanwilliam sandfish (Labeo seeberi) By Shaun Francois Lesch Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Faculty of Natural Science at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Dr C. Rhode Co-supervisor: Dr R. Slabbert Department of Genetics December 2020 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration: By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: December 2020 Copyright © 2020 Stellenbosch University All Rights Reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract: Labeo spp. are large freshwater fish found throughout southern Asia, the Middle East and Africa. The genus is characterised by specialised structures around the mouth and lips making it adapted to herbivorous feeding (algae and detritus). Clanwilliam sandfish (Labeo seeberi) was once widespread throughout its natural habitat (Olifants-Doring River system), but significant decreases in population size have seen them become absent in the Olifants River and retreat to the headwaters in the tributaries of the Doring River. Currently sandfish are confined to three populations namely the Oorlogskloof Nature Reserve (OKNR), Rietkuil (Riet) and Bos, with OKNR being the largest of the three and deemed the species sanctuary.
  • Diversity of Freshwater Fish in the Lower Reach of Indus River, Sindh Province Section, Pakistan Naveed A

    Diversity of Freshwater Fish in the Lower Reach of Indus River, Sindh Province Section, Pakistan Naveed A

    Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology & Fisheries Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. ISSN 1110 – 6131 Vol. 24 ( 6 ): 243 – 265 ( 2020) www.ejabf.journals.ekb.eg Diversity of freshwater fish in the lower reach of Indus River, Sindh province section, Pakistan Naveed A. Abro1,6, Baradi Waryani1,*, Naeem T. Narejo1, Sara Ferrando2, Saeed A. Abro3 , Abdul R. Abbasi1, Punhal K. Lashari1, Muhammad Y. Laghari1, Ghulam Q. Jamali4, Gul Naz5, Muneer Hussain5 and Habib -Ul -Hassan5,6 1Department of Fresh Water Biology & Fisheries, University Of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan; 2 DISTAV University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV 5, 16132 Genoa, Italy; 3 Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Sindh, Jamshoro; 4Department of Livestock and Fisheries, Government of Sindh, Pakistan 5Fisheries Development Board, Ministry of National Food Security and Research 6Department of Zoology (MRCC), University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan *Corresponding author: [email protected] ______________________________________________________________________________________ ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History: According to reports, the last comprehensive fish records from the Received: Aug. 4, 2020 Indus River were published in 1977. Although few recent studies have been Accepted: Aug. 27, 2020 conducted, they are limited to some confined localities, and hence there was Online: Sept. 6, 2020 a gap of comprehensive fish diversity analysis of the Indus River in Sindh _______________ province section. Therefore, the present investigation was performed to describe the fish fauna of the Indus River from its northern to its southern Keywords: extremities. In order to establish fish diversity and distribution, the study Indus River ; was accomplished from June 2016 to May 2017 covering 8 sampling Fish biodiversity; locations across the river.
  • Introduction Contribution of Indigenous Fish in Total Production Is

    Introduction Contribution of Indigenous Fish in Total Production Is

    Workshop Proceedings on Indigenous Fish Stock and Livelihood in Nepal 1 Introduction Contribution of indigenous fish in total production is declining worldwide as most fresh and marine fishes have been over fished (FAO 2008). Previously, many such over fished waters were introduced with non-native fish for providing immediate reliance to fishers through enhancing capture fisheries; and protection of native fish being over exploitation by diverting fisher to non-indigenous species. Details of scientific review might need either those strategies could be fruitful or not. However, recently, more focus has been given to develop the technologies of native fish species for enhancing their fishery and aquaculture from biodiversity perspectives. Knowledge and information on native species from the present perspective has seldom been synthesized and analyzed. Therefore, it is essential to collect the scattered data and prioritize the strategies for sustainable technological generation of these species in the country. The current proposal for organizing a workshop on such a crucial subject would be highly fruitful to give the direction of future research in development of fisheries and aquaculture technologies prioritizing values of indigenous fishes and re-positioning the fisheries and aquaculture to more rewarding, environment friendly, socially acceptable and economically profitable activity. The overall objective of the workshop is aquaculture development of native fish species for biodiversity and aquaculture practices. The symposium would attract the scientific attention on review, cross interaction, situation analysis, planning focused research, intervention program to make fisheries and aquaculture technology of indigenous fishes more competitive and advantageous. To address these issues, technical sessions are planned in following major themes: A.
  • Abstracts Part 1

    Abstracts Part 1

    375 Poster Session I, Event Center – The Snowbird Center, Friday 26 July 2019 Maria Sabando1, Yannis Papastamatiou1, Guillaume Rieucau2, Darcy Bradley3, Jennifer Caselle3 1Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA, 2Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium, Chauvin, LA, USA, 3University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA Reef Shark Behavioral Interactions are Habitat Specific Dominance hierarchies and competitive behaviors have been studied in several species of animals that includes mammals, birds, amphibians, and fish. Competition and distribution model predictions vary based on dominance hierarchies, but most assume differences in dominance are constant across habitats. More recent evidence suggests dominance and competitive advantages may vary based on habitat. We quantified dominance interactions between two species of sharks Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos and Carcharhinus melanopterus, across two different habitats, fore reef and back reef, at a remote Pacific atoll. We used Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV) to observe dominance behaviors and quantified the number of aggressive interactions or bites to the BRUVs from either species, both separately and in the presence of one another. Blacktip reef sharks were the most abundant species in either habitat, and there was significant negative correlation between their relative abundance, bites on BRUVs, and the number of grey reef sharks. Although this trend was found in both habitats, the decline in blacktip abundance with grey reef shark presence was far more pronounced in fore reef habitats. We show that the presence of one shark species may limit the feeding opportunities of another, but the extent of this relationship is habitat specific. Future competition models should consider habitat-specific dominance or competitive interactions.
  • Labeo Caeruleus (A Carp, No Common Name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    Labeo Caeruleus (A Carp, No Common Name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    Labeo caeruleus (a carp, no common name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, May 2012 Revised, March 2018 and June 2018 Web Version, 6/6/2018 Photo: R. Mintern. Public domain. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Labeo_caeruleus_Mintern_129.jpg. (March 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Eschmeyer et al. (2018): “Distribution: Nepal, India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh.” Status in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the U.S. Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the U.S. 1 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2018): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Actinopterygii Class Teleostei Superorder Ostariophysi Order Cypriniformes Superfamily Cyprinoidea Family Cyprinidae Genus Labeo Species Labeo caeruleus Day, 1877” From Eschmeyer et al. (2018): “Current status: Valid as Labeo caeruleus Day 1877. Cyprinidae: Labeoninae.” Size, Weight, and Age Range From Froese and Pauly (2017): “Max length : 35.0 cm TL male/unsexed; [Talwar and Jhingran 1991]” Environment From Froese and Pauly (2017): “Freshwater; benthopelagic.” Climate/Range From Froese and Pauly (2017): “Subtropical” 2 Distribution Outside the United States Native From Eschmeyer et al. (2018): “Distribution: Nepal, India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh.” Introduced This species has not been reported as introduced or established outside of its native range. Means of Introduction Outside the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established outside of its native range.
  • Checklist of Fishes of Thunder Bay District, Ontario

    Checklist of Fishes of Thunder Bay District, Ontario

    Thunder Bay Field Naturalists Checklist of Fish es of Thunder Bay District , Ontario 31 December 2019 Introduction This first edition of Checklist of Fishes of Thunder Bay District adds to existing checklists prepared by members of the Thunder Bay Field Naturalists (TBFN) covering other vertebrate taxa (mammals, birds, reptiles & amphibians), as well vascular plants, butterflies, and odonates. As with these other checklists, it covers the official judicial District of Thunder Bay (Figure 1). The District extends from the eastern border of Quetico Provincial Park east to White River, and from the international border north to Lake St. Joseph and the Albany River. Much of the District (60%) is within the Great Lakes watershed, with the remaining draining into the Arctic Ocean either north via the Hudson Bay Lowlands, or west via Rainy Lake/Lake of the Woods and the Nelson River watershed. Figure 1. Judicial District of Thunder Bay with primary watersheds and protected areas. 2 The fish species of the Thunder Bay District mostly reflect post-glacial colonization, modified by more recent ecological and anthropogenic influences. The Wisconsinan ice mass began to retreat north of Lake Superior circa 10,700 BP (Farrand and Drexler 1985), allowing fish to initially colonize the Thunder Bay area (Momot and Stephenson 1996). The Marquette advance circa 9900 BP likely wiped out these early colonizers, but its retreat around 9700 BP allowed many species access from glacial refugia in the Mississippi River basin to the south (Mandrak and Crossman 1992b; Stephenson and Momot 1994). Some species invaded from the east via the outlet of Lake Minong and Lake Superiors’ other post-glacial predecessors.
  • Download BALMNH No 22 2002

    Download BALMNH No 22 2002

    III I I I I I I I I III III Illilll III ALABAMA MUSEUM of Natural History Bulletin 22 November 30, 2002 Andrew C. Moore's "Evolution Once More": The Evolution­ Creationism Controversy from an Early 1920s Perspective Systematics and Biogeography of the Notropis rubellus Species Group (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL mSTORY The scientific publication of the Alabama Museum of Natural History. Richard L. Mayden, Editor. George E. Hooks, III, Managing Editor. BULLETIN AlABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY is published by the Alabama Museum of Natural History, a unit of The University of Alabama. The BUL­ LETIN succeeds its predecessor, the MUSEUM PAPERS, which was terminated in 1961 upon the transfer of the Museum to the University from its parent organiz­ ation, the Geological Survey of Alabama. The BULLETIN is devoted primarily to scholarship and research concerning the natural history of Alabama and the Southeast. It appears twice yearly in consecutive­ ly numbered issues. Communication concerning manuscripts, style, and editorial policy should be addressed to: Editor, BULLETIN AlABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, The University of Alabama, Box 870340, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0340; tele­ phone (205) 348-7550 or emailedtoehoo/{S@bio[og).. as.ua.edu. Prospective authors should examine the Notice to Authors inside the back cover. Orders and requests for general information should be addressed to BULLETIN AlABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, at the above address or emailed to [email protected]. Yearly subscriptions (two issues) are $30.00 for individu­ als, $50.00 for corporations and institutions. Numbers may be purchased individual­ ly.
  • Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana

    Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana

    Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings Volume 1 Number 61 2021 Article 3 March 2021 Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana Michael H. Doosey University of New Orelans, [email protected] Henry L. Bart Jr. Tulane University, [email protected] Kyle R. Piller Southeastern Louisiana Univeristy, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Biodiversity Commons Recommended Citation Doosey, Michael H.; Bart, Henry L. Jr.; and Piller, Kyle R. (2021) "Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana," Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings: No. 61. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings/vol1/iss61/3 This Original Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by Volunteer, Open Access, Library Journals (VOL Journals), published in partnership with The University of Tennessee (UT) University Libraries. This article has been accepted for inclusion in Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings by an authorized editor. For more information, please visit https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings. Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana Abstract Since the publication of Freshwater Fishes of Louisiana (Douglas, 1974) and a revised checklist (Douglas and Jordan, 2002), much has changed regarding knowledge of inland fishes in the state. An updated reference on Louisiana’s inland and coastal fishes is long overdue. Inland waters of Louisiana are home to at least 224 species (165 primarily freshwater, 28 primarily marine, and 31 euryhaline or diadromous) in 45 families. This checklist is based on a compilation of fish collections records in Louisiana from 19 data providers in the Fishnet2 network (www.fishnet2.net).
  • Family Cyprinidae Subfamily Labeoninae

    Family Cyprinidae Subfamily Labeoninae

    SUBFAMILY Labeoninae Bleeker, 1859 - labeonins, labeos, algae-eaters, carps etc. [=?Paeonomiae, ?Apalopterinae, Platycarinae, Temnochilae, Labeonini, ?Plalacrognathini, Garrae, Gymnostomi, Rohteichthyina, Discognathina, Parapsilorhynchidae, Banganina, Osteochilina, Semilabeoina] Notes: Name in prevailing recent practice ?Paeonomiae McClelland, 1838:943 [ref. 2924] (subfamily) ? Cirrhinus [corrected to Paeonominae by McClelland 1839:225, 261, 264 [ref. 2923]; no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] ?Apalopterinae McClelland, 1839:226, 261, 299 [ref. 2923] (subfamily) ? Platycara [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Platycarinae Macleay, 1841:271 [ref. 32498] (family) Platycara [also Macleay 1842:204 [ref. 32499]] Temnochilae Heckel, 1847:280, 281 [ref. 2068] (Abtheilung) ? Labeo [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Labeonini Bleeker, 1859d:XXVIII [ref. 371] (stirps) Labeo [family-group name used as valid by: Rainboth 1991 [ref. 32596], Nelson 1994 [ref. 26204], Yue et al. 2000 [ref. 25272], Zhang & Chen 2004 [ref. 27930], Li, Ran & Chen 2006 [ref. 29057], Nelson 2006 [ref. 32486], Zhang & Kottelat 2006 [ref. 28711], Zhang, Qiang & Lan 2008 [ref. 29452], Yang & Mayden 2010, Zheng, Yang, Chen & Wang 2010 [ref. 30961], Zhu, Zhang, Zhang & Han 2011 [ref. 31305], Yang et al. 2012a, Yang et al. 2012b [ref. 32362]] ?Phalacrognathini Bleeker, 1860a:422 [ref. 370] (cohors) ? Labeo [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Garrae Bleeker, 1863–64:24 [ref. 4859] (phalanx) Garra [also Bleeker 1863b:191 [ref. 397]; stem Garr- confirmed by Smith 1945:259 [ref. 4056], by Cavender & Coburn in Mayden 1992:322 [ref. 23260], by Mirza 2000:356 [ref.