DOCSLIB.ORG

Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal 4 July 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal 4 July 2011 Proceedings of the Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal 4 July 2011 Edited by Suresh Kumar Wagle Neeta Pradhan Proceedings of the Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal 1 Proceedings of the Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal Proceedings of the Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal March 2012 Edited by: Suresh Kumar Wagle Neeta Pradhan Organizer: Fisheries Research Division, Godawari Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC) 2 Proceedings of the Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal Published by: Fisheries Research Division, Godawari, Lalitpur, Nepal Copyright: 2011, Fisheries Research Division, Lalitpur, Nepal, Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC) The materials in this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part or in any form for education, research and other non- profit uses with acknowledgement of the source. FRD, Godawari would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication which uses this document as a source. Citation: Wagle, S. K. and N. Pradhan (eds.), 2011. Proceedings of the consultative workshop on fish conservation in Nepal, Fisheries Research Division (FRD), Godawari, Lalitpur, Nepal. …… + …….. pp. ISBN: ……….. Available from: Fisheries Research Division PO Box 13342, Godawari, Lalitpur, Nepal Disclaimer: The views expressed in the following papers are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NARC or the organization it represent. 3 Proceedings of the Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal Foreword The workshop on Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal was held on 4 July 2011 in Lalitpur, Nepal. It was organized by Fisheries Research Division, Godawari, Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC). The workshop was attended by over 50 scientists, planners, policy makers, private entrepreneurs from National Planning Commission, Fisheries Research Division, Fisheries Research Centers, Directorate of Fisheries Development, Fisheries Development Centers, Tribhuvan University, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, JICA/Nepal and Freelancers. Recent works have shown nearly 229 fish species are found in freshwater systems of Nepal. In the region, characterized by rugged terrain and very low levels of human development, fisheries play an important role in providing food and income to the people. However, freshwater fishes along with its habitats have been encroached and threatened due to environmental, social and developmental activities. There are several social reasons causing inevitable depletion of fishes from lakes, ponds, wetlands and swamps. The objectives of the workshop was to share information, experiences and challenges in the native fish management, improve understanding of their importance in peoples’ livelihoods and assess their current level of exploitation, sustainable uses of the indigenous fishes. A total of five papers were presented in this workshop. Aquaculture development problems connected with indigenous food and game fishes, current status of indigenous fishes and their contribution in rural livelihoods, efforts on domestication and breeding of native fishes, factors for the depletion of native fishes and strategies for the conservation of fish in Nepal have been extensively reviewed in the proceedings. The Fisheries Research Division of Nepal Agricultural Research Council is proud of bringing out this publication. I would also like to take this opportunity to thank all the stakeholder organizations for their support in the organization of the workshop and publishing its proceedings. The efforts of all the support staff are also sincerely acknowledged. I believe that the proceedings will be useful to all those, who are involved in fisheries and aquaculture management in the country. Dr. Dil Bahadur Gurung Executive Director Nepal Agricultural Research Council 4 Proceedings of the Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal Acknowledgement • National Planning Commision, Kathmandu • Directorate of Fisheries Development, DoA, Kathmandu • Nepal Fisheries Society, Kathmandu • Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences (IAAS), Rampur • Central Department of Zoology, Tribhuvan University • Regional Agriculture Research Station, Tarahara • Regional Agriculture Research Station, Parawanipur • Fisheries Research Centre, Pokhara • Fisheries Research Centre, Trishuli • Kali Gandaki Fish Hatchery, Syanja 5 Proceedings of the Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal List of acronyms/synonyms 6 Proceedings of the Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal 04 July 2011 (20 Asar 2068) Venue: Fisheries Research Division, Godawari, Lalitpur Time Activities Presenter 08:30-09:00 Registration, Tea and Snacks Renu Aryal and Shiva Lal Adhikari Inaugural Session Convener: Jay Dev Bista, Chief, FRC Pokhara Time Activities Presenter 09:00 Gathering in the hall Convener 09:00-09:05 Placement of all the participants Chairperson: Mr. Dinesh Pariyar, Executive Director, NARC Chief Guest: Prof. Dr. Subodh Narayan Jha, Hon. Member, National Planning Commission 09:05-09:15 Welcome & Objective of Dr. Tek Bahadur Gurung, Director of Livestock & the workshop Fisheries Research, NARC 09:15-09:20 Inauguration by lightening Prof. Dr. Subodh Narayan Jha, Hon. Member, the lamp: Chief Guest National Planning Commission 09:20-09:25 Few words Prof. Dr. Jeevan Shrestha 09:25-09:30 Few words Mr. Kishore Kumar Upadhyaya, President, NEFISH 09:30-09:35 Few words Dr. Deep Bahadur Swar 09:40-09:50 Address by Chief Guest Prof. Dr. Subodh Narayan Jha Hon. Member, NPC 09:50-09:55 Vote of Thanks Mr. Suresh K. Wagle, Chied, FRD, Godawari 09:55-10:00 Chairperson Remarks Mr. Dinesh Pariyar, Executive Director NARC 7 Proceedings of the Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal Technical Session: 1 Chair: Dr. Tek Bahadur Gurung, Director, Live & Fish Research, NARC Co-Chair: Mr. Ramananda Mishra, Chief, National Natural & Artificial Fisheries Development Program Rapporteur: Surendra Prasad & Dr. Arun P. Baidya Time Title Presentator 10:45-11:00 Threat Status of indigenous fish species Jeewan Shrestha 11:00-11:15 Review of acts, regulations and guidelines Kishor K. Upadhyaya related to aquatic resource and animal conservation 11:15-11:30 Contribution of indigenous fishes in livelihood Ramananda Mishra of fishers in Nepal 11:30-11:45 Impact of damming on the environment of flow Surya R. Guvajoo and persistence of native fishes 11:45-12:00 Potential impact of climate change in fisheries Anand Gautam and and adaptation measures Suresh K. Wagle 12:15-12:30 Past and present status of fresh water fish Bhagwat Prasad and Jay K. production from natural waters in Nepal: trend Mandal analysis and future prediction 12:30-12:45 Discussion 12:45-12:50 Chairpersons Remarks Poster Session with Lunch 12:50-14:00 Technical Session: 2 Chair: Prof. Dr. Surya Ratna Guvaju, Central Department of Zoology, Tribhuwan University Rapporteur: Mr. Asha Raymajhi & Agni Prasad Nepal 14:00-14:15 Native fish conservation in Nepal: challenges Tek B. Gurung and opportunities 14:15-14:30 Status of air breathing fishes of Nepal Madhav K. Shrestha 14:30-14:45 Diversity, inventory, and conservation of the Richard L. Mayden fishes of Nepal: strategies for a national effort of success with a rapidly changing planet 14:45-15:00 Indigenous Fishes of Nepal and the need of their Krishna Gopal Rajbanshi Conservation for their Sustainable Development 15:00-15:15 Discussion 15:15-15:25 Chairpersons Remarks Wrap up session Facilitator: Mr. Suresh K. Wagle and Jay D. Bista 15:25-16:30 Plennary exercise: Finalization of draft recommendation of the workshop 16:30-16:35 Mr. Rajendra KC, Director, DoFD, Balaju 16:35-16:40 Few words: …………… 16:40-16:45 Closing remarks: Dr. Deep Bahadur Swar 8 Proceedings of the Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal Contents Forword - Executive Director, NARC Acknowledgement List of acronyms/synonyms Workshop program Introduction Native fish conservation in Nepal: challenges and opportunities : Tek B Gurung Threat status of indigenous fish species: Jiwan Shrestha Indigenous Fishes of Nepal and the need of their Conservation for their Sustainable Development: Krishna Gopal Rajbanshi Aquatic resource conservation and enhancement in Nepal: Kishor K. Upadhyaya Impact of damming on the environment of flow and persistence of native fishes: Surya Ratna Gubhaju Diversity of conventional and non-conventional fishing devices and their impact on fish conservation: Asha Rayamajhi, Neeta Pradhan Indigenous catfishes and their diversification for aquaculture: Dilip Kumar Jha Fish bio-diversity of Marshyangdi River and its feeder streams: Ram Bhajan Mandal and Dilip Kumar Jha Breeding performance of indigenous fishes for conservation of wild population: Arun P Baidya and Hare Ram Devkota Observations on the reproductive performance of captive stocks of asala (Schizothorax richardsoni): Suresh Kumar Wagle, Nand Kishore Roy, Asha Raymajhi, Tadashi Murata, Gopal Prasad Lamsal Reproduction and growth performance of Katle (Neolissocheilus hexagonolepsis McClelland ) in mid hill region: Sadhuram Basnet, Kamala Gharti and Gopal Prasad Lamsal 9 Proceedings of the Consultative Workshop on Fish Conservation in Nepal Reproductive and growth performance of Sahar (Tor putitora) and its implication in aquaculture: Jay D. Bista, Bharat K. Shrestha, , Agni P. Nepal, Surendra Prasad, Arun P. Baidya, Madhav
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology the University of Michigan Annarbor, Miliiigan
    OCCASIONAL PAPERS OF THE MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANNARBOR, MILIIIGAN FISHES OF THE ASIAN CYPRINID GENUS CHAGUNIUS mSTRACT.-Rainbotli, Walter Jolin, 1986. Fisher of tl~eAsian cyf~rinidfish gr7~u.tChagunius. Occ. I'ap. MILS.Zool. Univ. Michigan, 712.1-17, f1g.y. 1-3. 'I'he barbin genus Chagunim, previously monotypic, is redescribed and ex- panded to include three species. Examination of preserved material from the known range of the genus indicates that the original member of the genus, Clic~,yuniuscl~agunio (Ilamilton), is found only in the Gangetic plains of India, and two additional species are from Burma. Chagxniifi nicholsi Myers is known from the upper Irrawaddy basin of northern Burma, and Cl~agunimbail~yi, described herein, is found it1 the Salween basin of castern Burma and western l'l~ailand.l'he Burmese species resemble each other more than either resem- bles the Indian species, which has pronounccd cliffercnces in measurement proportions and several non-overlapping counts. These species have patterns of intestinal coiling which arc among the simplest found in barbins, and the type species has a single loop, the simplest pattern found in cyprinids. The genera most closely related to Chagunizrs are parapatric, with one genus in southeastern Asia and at least one other genus in peninsular India. Key words: Chagunius, Cyprinidae, burbin, class$cation, taxonomy, Burma, In- dia, 7'liailand. INTRODUCTION The genus Chapnius Smith has three species, all found in different drainages, one in the Irrawaddy, one in the Brahmaputra and Ganges along the Himalaya foothills, and the third known species in the Sal- *Department of Biology, University of California, 1.0s Arrgclcs, Califor~lia,90024 LJ.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Spawning and Early Life History of Mountain Whitefish in The
    SPAWNING AND EARLY LIFE HISTORY OF MOUNTAIN WHITEFISH IN THE MADISON RIVER, MONTANA by Jan Katherine Boyer A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Fish and Wildlife Management MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana January 2016 © COPYRIGHT by Jan Katherine Boyer 2016 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my advisor, Dr. Christopher Guy, for challenging me and providing advice throughout every stage of this project. I also thank my committee members, Dr. Molly Webb and Dr. Tom McMahon, for guidance and suggestions which greatly improved this research. My field technicians Jordan Rowe, Greg Hill, and Patrick Luckenbill worked hard through fair weather and snowstorms to help me collect the data presented here. I also thank Travis Horton, Pat Clancey, Travis Lohrenz, Tim Weiss, Kevin Hughes, Rick Smaniatto, and Nick Pederson of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks for field assistance and advice. Mariah Talbott, Leif Halvorson, and Eli Cureton of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service assisted with field and lab work. Richard Lessner and Dave Brickner at the Madison River Foundation helped to secure funding for this project and conduct outreach in the Madison Valley. The Channels Ranch, Valley Garden Ranch, Sun West Ranch, and Galloup’s Slide Inn provided crucial land and river access. I also thank my fellow graduate students both for advice on project and class work and for being excellent people to spend time with. Ann Marie Reinhold, Mariah Mayfield, David Ritter, and Peter Brown were especially helpful during the early stages of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Management Plan for Black Hills Streams 2015 – 2019
    Fisheries Management Plan for Black Hills Streams 2015 – 2019 South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks Wildlife Division Gene Galinat Greg Simpson Bill Miller Jake Davis Michelle Bucholz John Carreiro Dylan Jones Stan Michals Fisheries Management Plan for Black Hills Streams, 2015-2019 Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 II. Resource Descriptions ........................................................................................................... 4 Black Hills Fish Management Area ...................................................................................... 4 III. Management of Black Hills Fish Management Area Stream Fisheries ...................... 7 Classification of Trout Streams ............................................................................................. 7 Regulations .............................................................................................................................. 7 Stocking .................................................................................................................................... 8 Fish Surveys ............................................................................................................................ 8 Angler Surveys ........................................................................................................................ 9 Habitat and Angler Access ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ichthyofaunal Diversity of River Nal Diversity of River Kabulat District
    Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci., Vol 9[2] January 2020 : 40-44 ©2020 Academy for Environment and Life Sciences, India Online ISSN 2277-1808 Journal’s URL:http://www.bepls.com CODEN: BEPLAD Global Impact Factor 0.876 Universal Impact Factor 0.9804 NAAS Rating 4.95 ORIGINAL ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Ichthyofaunal Diversity of River Kabulat District Charsadda, KPK, Pakistan Majid Khan1, Waheed Ur Rehman1, Ghani Ur Rehman1,Zulqurnain2, Sadia Ghaffar3, Seema Fatima3, Saima Afroz3, Zeeshan Shamim4, Safiullah Khan5, Israr Aziz6,Wisal Ahmad7,Asif Ali8,Raheem Shah9, Muhammad Naeem10, Muhammad Ayub Babar11 1Department of Zoology, Government Post Graduate College Charsadda, KPK, Pakistan 2Department of Zoology GC University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan. 3Department of Zoology, Kohat University of Science & Technology, KUST-26000, KP, Pakistan 4Mirpur University of Science and Technology (MUST) Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. 4School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham UK. 5Lecturer Government College NO.1. D.I. Khan. 6Department of Biosciences COMSATS University Islamabad Park Road, Islamabad Capital Territory 45550. 7COMSATS University Islamabad Park Road, TarlaiKalan, Islamabad 45550, Pakistan. 8Department of Zoology and Biology, PirMehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. 9Directorate Headquarter Agriculture Research Institute ARI, Sariab Quetta. 10Directorate of Cereal Crops Agriculture Research Institute ARI Sariab Quetta. 11Directorate of Vegetable Seed Production, Agriculture Research Institute ARI Sariab Quetta. E-Mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT A study on the fishes of River Kabul at District Charsadda, Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa was conducted from March 2017 to September 2017. A total of 16 fish species were identified belonging to 4 Orders (Cypriniformes, Siluriformes, Channiforms and Mastacembeliformes) and 8 families (Cyprinidae, Nemachilidea, Sisoridea, Siluridae, Bagridea, Channidae, Mastacembeldae and Schilibeidae).
    [Show full text]
  • The Vermont Management Plan for Brook, Brown and Rainbow Trout Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department January 2018
    The Vermont Management Plan for Brook, Brown and Rainbow Trout Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department January 2018 Prepared by: Rich Kirn, Fisheries Program Manager Reviewed by: Brian Chipman, Will Eldridge, Jud Kratzer, Bret Ladago, Chet MacKenzie, Adam Miller, Pete McHugh, Lee Simard, Monty Walker, Lael Will ACKNOWLEDGMENT: This project was made possible by fishing license sales and matching Dingell- Johnson/Wallop-Breaux funds available through the Federal Sportfish Restoration Act. Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 II. Life History and Ecology ................................................................... 2 III. Management History ......................................................................... 7 IV. Status of Existing Fisheries ............................................................. 13 V. Management of Trout Habitat .......................................................... 17 VI. Management of Wild Trout............................................................. 34 VII. Management of Cultured Trout ..................................................... 37 VIII. Management of Angler Harvest ................................................... 66 IX. Trout Management Plan Goals, Objectives and Strategies .............. 82 X. Summary of Laws and Regulations .................................................. 87 XI. Literature Cited ............................................................................... 92 I. Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Monograph of the Cyprinid Fis~Hes of the Genus Garra Hamilton (173)
    MONOGRAPH OF THE CYPRINID FIS~HES OF THE GENUS GARRA HAMILTON By A. G. K. MENON, Zoologist, ,Zoological Surt1ey of India, Oalcutta. (With 1 Table, 29 Text-figs. and 6 Plates) CONTENTS Page I-Introduction 175 II-Purpose and general results 176 III-Methods and approaches 176 (a) The definition of Measurements 176 (b) The analysis of Intergradation 178 (c) The recognition of subspecies. 179 (d) Procedures in the paper 180 (e) Evaluation of systematic characters 181 (I) Abbreviations of names of Institutions 181 IV-Historical sketch 182 V-Definition of the genus 187 VI-Systematic section 188 (a) The variabilis group 188 (i) The variabilis Complex 188 1. G. variabilis 188 2. G. rossica 189 (b) The tibanica group 191 (i) The tibanica Complex 191 3. G. tibanica. 191 4. G. quadrimaculata 192 5. G. ignestii 195 6. G. ornata 196 7. G. trewavasi 198 8. G. makiensis 198 9. G. dembeensis 199 10. G. ethelwynnae 202 (ii) The rufa complex 203 11. G. rufa rufa 203 12. G. rufa obtusa 205 13. O. barteimiae 206 (iii) The lamta complex 208 14. G. lamta 208 15. G. mullya 212 16. G. 'ceylonensis ceylonensis 216 17. G. c. phillipsi 216 18. G. annandalei 217 (173) 174 page (iv) The lissorkynckus complex 219 19. G. lissorkynchus 219 20. G. rupecula 220 ~ (v) The taeniata complex 221 21. G. taeniata. 221 22" G. borneensis 224 (vi) The yunnanensis complex 224 23. G. yunnanensis 225 24. G. gracilis 229 25. G. naganensis 226 26. G. kempii 227 27. G. mcOlellandi 228 28. G.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fish Fauna of Andhra Pradesh with Comments on the Threatened and Endemic Species
    ZOOlWICAlOF INDIA SURVEY . .. IIU~_., ....'f~. " ~ -.,.. ' ~ Rec. ZOO!. Surv. India: l09(Part-l) : 41-47, 2009 FRESHWATER FISH FAUNA OF ANDHRA PRADESH WITH COMMENTS ON THE THREATENED AND ENDEMIC SPECIES R. P. BARMAN Zoological Survey of India, FPS Building, Kolkata-700 016 INTRODUCTION Andhra Pradesh is one of the eight maritme states of our country lying on the southeastern coast of the Indian Peninsula. Three major mountain ranges are located in the state. The Eastern Ghats which constitute a chain of hill ranges fringing the east coastal line, the Deccan plateau with the Sahyadri range of Adilabad district to the north border and the Horseley & other hills of the Chittoor and Anantapur districts to the south border of this state. Two major rivers of South India. viz., the Godavari and the Krishna River with their several tributaries form the chief perennial river systems of this state. There are a large number of medium and small sized rivers in addition to several Man made reservoirs in this state. Moreover, there are several wetlands including one of the National Wetlands, viz., Kolleru Lake in this state. The state is known to contain 158 species under 68 genera, 27 families and 10 orders of freshwater fishes (Barman, 1993). The freshwater fish fauna of this state has been reviewed in respect of the threatened and endemic freshwater fishes of our country. This has revealed that Andhra Pradesh contains 53 threatened freshwater fishes of India as per Molur & Walker (1998) and Menon (1999 and 2004). Out ofth 53 threatened species, Endangered, Vulnerable, Rare and near threatened species are represented by 15, 27, 5 and .6 species respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • 15. Fish Diversity of Triyuga River
    OurShrestha Nature / Our│December Nature (2016), 2016 │ 1414 (1):(1): 124-134 124-134 ISSN: 1991-2951 (Print) ISSN: 2091-2781 (Online) Our Nature Journal homepage: http://nepjol.info/index.php/ON Fish diversity of Triyuga River, Udayapur District, Nepal Jay Narayan Shrestha Department of Zoology, Post Graduate Campus, Biratnagar, Tribhuvan University, Nepal E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The present paper deals with a synopsis of 48 fish species under 35 genera belonging to 17 families and 6 orders from Triyuga River. Some interesting fish species reported from this river are Barilus shacra, Garra annandalei, Psilorhynchoides pseudecheneis, Badis badis, Olyra longicoudata, Tor putitora, Labeo dero and Anguilla bengalensis . Fish diversity of Triyuga river is rich, thus further extensive study is essential for their conservation. Key words : Barilus shacra , Fish, Fattehpur, Mahabharat hill DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/on.v14i1.16452 Manuscript details: Received: 28.08.2016 / Accepted: 25.11.2016 Citation: Shrestha, J.N. 2016. Fish diversity of Triyuga River, Udayapur District, Nepal . Our Nature 14(1) :124-134. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/on.v14i1.16452 Copyright: © Shrestha 2016. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Introduction Initially two small streams, in the form of Udayapur district (26 o39'-27 o22'N and drainage of the lake, take their form from 86 o9'-87 o10'E) is located in the eastern de- two separate spots of the lake and both of velopment region of Nepal. It is bounded them run down towards the south slope by nine districts,Dhankuta and Sunsari in then confluence and become the river Tri- the east, Saptari and Siraha in the south, yuga.
    [Show full text]
  • 1887 -- Podagrion Charybdis First Record
    JoTT Note 1(4): 243-244 A note on the ichthyofauna of Solapur (Distribution and key to species) District, with first report of a cyprinid fish Materials examined: 4 exs., 21.ix.1978, Rasbora caverii (Jerdon) from Maharashtra Shirshi Village, Akkalkot, Solapur District, State, India coll. A.S. Mahabal, P/2512. 5 exs., 8.iv.1983, Shivganga river, Narsapur, Pune district, coll. M.S. Pradhan, P/2637. S.S. Jadhav & B.E.Yadav Common Name: Cauvery Rasbora Zoological Survey of India, Western Regional Station, Pune, Maharashtra 411044, India Fin formula: (D. 9, P.14, V.7, A.8, LL.32) Email: [email protected] Diagnostic features: Mouth small, obliquely directed upwards, Solapur District (74042-76010E & 17010-18032N) occupies maxilla not extending to below anterior border of the orbit. an area of 15021km2 and lies entirely in the BhimaSina-Man Symphysial knob on lower jaw present. Barbels absent. Dorsal river basins, just before the Bhima River leaves Maharashtra State fin inserted considerably behind origin of pelvic fins but does not to enter into Karnataka State. extend over anal fin, its commencement considerably nearer to A faunistic survey of fish in Solapur District was conducted in caudal fin base than to snout tip. Caudal fin forked with both lobes 1978 by a team of scientists from the Western Regional Station,pointed, lower lobe slightly longer. Body with a faintly marked Zoological Survey of India, Pune. In the State Gazetteer of lateral streak. The lateral band more prominent in posterior half Maharashtra (Kunte 1977) 27 species were reported from Solapur of the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Fauna of North East India with Special Reference to Endemic and Threatened Species
    Rec. zool. Surv. India: 101 (Part 3-4) : 81-99,2003 FISH FAUNA OF NORTH EAST INDIA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ENDEMIC AND THREATENED SPECIES NmEDITA SEN Eastern Regional Station, Zoological Survey of India, Shillong-793 003 INTRODUCTION North Easr India with it's sister states have unique topography, varied watershed pattern and physiography. The area is enriched with diversified fish fauna. A perusal of literature reveals that the area is blessed with 291 species under I 19 genera, 38 families and 12 orders (Hora, 1921 a, 1921b, 1936; Jayaram 1963, 1999; Malhotra and Suri, 1969; Sen, 1977, 1995, 1999a, 1999b; Bannan, 1984, 1992, 1994; Sen, 1985; S~gh & Singh, 1985; Vishwanath & Singh, 1986; Datta, Bannan & Jayaram, 1987; Talwar & Jhingran, 1991; Bhagowati & Biswas 1992; Vishwanath, 1993; Sen & Biswas, 1994; Nath & Dey, 1-997;· Keishing & Vishwanath, 1998, 1999; Kumar & Singh, 1998; Vishwanath et al. 1998; Vi &hwanath & Kosygin, 1999, 2000a, 2000b, 2001; Arunkumar, 2000a, 2000b; Arunkumar & Singh, 2000; Menon et al. 2000). The recorded and reported species along with their distribution in different States of N. E. India, status, type locality and endemicity have been shown in Table 1. Controversy is there regarding total number of species occurring in North East India. Regarding endemic species also differences of opinion persist. Sen (1985) identified 48 species to be endemic to Assam and neighbouring North Eastern States. Sarkar and Ponniah (2000) reported 66 species endemic to this region. Ghosh and Lipton (1982) reported 33 species as restricted in their distribution to this region. The present paper is worked out to get a total picture of the fish species recorded and reported so far from this region, as well as the endemic and threatened species occurring in N.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichthyofaunal Diversity and Conservation Status in Rivers of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
    Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 10(4): 131-143 Article Ichthyofaunal diversity and conservation status in rivers of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan Mukhtiar Ahmad1, Abbas Hussain Shah2, Zahid Maqbool1, Awais Khalid3, Khalid Rasheed Khan2, 2 Muhammad Farooq 1Department of Zoology, Govt. Post Graduate College, Mansehra, Pakistan 2Department of Botany, Govt. Post Graduate College, Mansehra, Pakistan 3Department of Zoology, Govt. Degree College, Oghi, Pakistan E-mail: [email protected] Received 12 August 2020; Accepted 20 September 2020; Published 1 December 2020 Abstract Ichthyofaunal composition is the most important and essential biotic component of an aquatic ecosystem. There is worldwide distribution of fresh water fishes. Pakistan is blessed with a diversity of fishes owing to streams, rivers, dams and ocean. In freshwater bodies of the country about 193 fish species were recorded. There are about 30 species of fish which are commercially exploited for good source of proteins and vitamins. The fish marketing has great socio economic value in the country. Unfortunately, fish fauna is declining at alarming rate due to water pollution, over fishing, pesticide use and other anthropogenic activities. Therefore, about 20 percent of fish population is threatened as endangered or extinct. All Mashers are ‘endangered’, notably Tor putitora, which is also included in the Red List Category of International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as Endangered. Mashers (Tor species) are distributed in Southeast Asian and Himalayan regions including trans-Himalayan countries like Pakistan and India. The heavy flood of July, 2010 resulted in the minimizing of Tor putitora species Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and the fish is now found extinct from river Swat.
    [Show full text]
  • Teleostei: Nemacheilidae)
    21 Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 21-30, 7 figs., 1 tab., July 2013 © 2013 by Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, Germany – ISSN 0936-9902 Two new species of Schistura from Myanmar (Teleostei: Nemacheilidae) Jörg Bohlen* and Vendula Šlechtová* Schistura rubrimaculata, new species, is described from two streams on the eastern slope of the Rakhine Range draining in Irrawaddy River. It reaches up to 27.7 mm SL and differs from all other species of Schistura by the presence of a distinct red dot above the midlateral line before the caudal-fin base (not visible in preserved speci- mens), a very slender body and a white ventral side below a broad black midlateral stripe; the dorsal side of the snout dark grey, and the anus located close to the anal-fin origin. Schistura pawensis, new species, shares with S. rubrimaculata the small size, slender body and general pigmentation pattern and is considered as closely re- lated to S. rubrimaculata. Schistura pawensis differs from S. rubrimaculata in having fewer branched rays in caudal and dorsal fins, the anus at mid-distance between pelvic and anal fins, fewer pores in lateral line, the dorsal side of the snout white, and the red dot on the caudal peduncle smaller and less prominent. Introduction Material and methods The loach genus Schistura is widespread across The specimens were either fixed in 4 % formal- South and Southeast Asia and occurs in this area dehyde and later transferred into 70 % ethanol in nearly every stream. Up to now, about 193 for storage (specimens deposited in ZRC and species are considered as valid (Kottelat, 2012), CMK) or fixed and stored in 96 % ethanol (spec- most of them with a restricted area of distribution.
    [Show full text]