REWRITING CONCEPTUAL ART Critical Views

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

REWRITING CONCEPTUAL ART Critical Views REWRITING CONCEPTUAL ART Critical Views [Critical ViewsIn the list—PL same series please insert] The New Museology edited by Peter Vergo Renaissance Bodies edited by Lucy Gent and Nigel Llewellyn Modernism in Design edited by Paul Greenhalgh Interpreting Contemporary Art edited by Stephen Bann and William Allen The Portrait in Photography edited by Graham Clarke Utopias and the Millennium edited by Krishan Kumar and Stephen Bann The Cultures of Collecting edited by John Elsner and Roger Cardinal Boundaries in China edited by John Hay Frankenstein, Creation and Monstrosity edited by Stephen Bann A New Philosophy of History edited by Frank Ankersmit and Hans Kellner Parisian Fields edited by Michael Sheringham Sculpture and Its Reproductions edited by Anthony Hughes and Erich Ranfft Voyages and Visions Towards a Cultural History of Travel edited by Ja´s Elsner and Joan-Pau Rubiés Mappings edited by Denis Cosgrove REWRITING CONCEPTUAL ART Edited by Michael Newman and Jon Bird REAKTION BOOKS Published by Reaktion Books Ltd 79 Farringdon Road, London ec1m 3ju, uk www. reaktionbooks.co.uk First published 1999 Copyright © Reaktion Books Ltd 1999 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers. Birgit Pelzer’s essay was translated from the French by Robert Vallier. Photoset by Goodfellow & Egan Publishing Management Printed and bound in Great Britain by Biddles British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Rewriting Conceptual art. – (Critical views) 1. Conceptual art 2. Conceptual art – Influence I. Newman, Michael, 1954 – II. Bird, Jon 700 isbn 1 86189 052 4 Contents Notes on the Editors and Contributors vii Introduction Michael Newman and Jon Bird 1 1 Siting the Page: Exhibiting Works in Publications – Some Examples of Conceptual Art in the USA Anne Rorimer 11 2 Mappings: Situationists and/or Conceptualists Peter Wollen 27 3 Conceptual Art and/as Philosophy Peter Osborne 47 4 Still You Ask for More: Demand, Display and ‘The New Art’ William Wood 66 5 Minding the Body: Robert Morris’s 1971 Tate Gallery Retrospective Jon Bird 88 6 Cleaning Up in the 1970s: The Work of Judy Chicago, Mary Kelly and Mierle Laderman Ukeles Helen Molesworth 107 7 Conceptual Art History or, A Home for Homes for America David Campany 123 8 A Media Art: Conceptualism in Latin America in the 1960s Alex Alberro 140 9 Matter of Words: Translations in East European Conceptualism Desa Philippi 152 10 Giulio Paolini Stephen Bann 169 11 Marcel Broodthaers: The Place of the Subject Birgit Pelzer 186 12 After Conceptual Art: Joe Scanlan’s Nesting Bookcases, Duchamp, Design and the Impossibility of Disappearing Michael Newman 206 References 222 Select Bibliography 243 Photographic Acknowledgements 245 Index 246 Notes on the Editors and Contributors michael newman is Principal Lecturer in Research at Central Saint Martins College of Art and Design, The London Institute. From 1994 to 1998, he was Head of Art History and Theoretical Studies at the Slade School of Fine Art, University College London. He holds a doctorate in philosophy from the University of Leuven, Belgium. Newman has written extensively on contempo- rary art, as well as theoretical and thematic texts on modernism and the relation- ship between criticism and philosophy. jon bird is Professor of Art and Critical Theory at Middlesex University and a tutor in the Theory Department at the Jan Van Eyck Academie, Maastricht. He has published extensively on contemporary art and cultural theory and has curated exhibitions, including Leon Golub’s forthcoming retrospective at the Irish Museum of Modern Art, Dublin. Bird was a founder editor of the journal Block and a co-editor and contributor to the ‘Futures’ series of conferences and books. alexander alberro is Assistant Professor of Modern Art at the University of Florida. He is also the editor of two anthologies, Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology (1999), and Two-Way Mirror Power: Dan Graham’s Writings On His Art (1999), and is preparing a book, Deprivileging Art: The Politics of Conceptual Art, for publication. stephen bann is Professor of Modern Cultural Studies at the University of Kent. He has published widely in the field of contemporary art, and was co- editor of the anthology Interpreting Contemporary Art (Reaktion, 1991). Bann also authored the introduction to the catalogue of the exhibition Global Conceptualism currently touring North America. His present field of research is the interaction between printmakers, painters and photographers in nineteenth- century France, a study which forms a sequel to his Paul Delaroche: History Painted (Reaktion, 1997). david campany is an artist and Senior Lecturer in the History and Theory of Photography at the Surrey Institute of Art and Design. He is currently conduct- ing doctoral research with Central Saint Martins School of Art in photography and the reproduction of art. Recent publications include ‘Art Photographed: viii notes on the editors and contributors Some Notes on Painting and the Book’ for the exhibition catalogue Postcards on Photography (Cambridge Darkroom). An essay on Campany’s public art prac- tice by Cynthia Rose will appear in Trade Secrets (forthcoming). helen molesworth is Assistant Professor of Art and Curator of the Amelie A. Wallace gallery at SUNY at Old Westbury. Founding editor of Documents,a journal of contemporary visual culture, Molesworth has published extensively on modern and contemporary art, including feminist issues. peter osborne is Professor of Modern European Philosophy and director of the graduate programme in Aesthetics and Art Theory at Middlesex University, London. He is also an editor of the journal Radical Philosophy. Osborne is the author of The Politics of Time: Modernity and Avant-Garde (1995) and editor of A Critical Sense: Interviews with Intellectuals (1996) and From An Aesthetic Point of View (forthcoming). He is currently preparing a book on Conceptual art. birgit pelzer studied philosophy at the universities of Louvain, Cracow and Heidelberg. She is Professor of Modern Aesthetics and Philosophy at the Ecoles Supérieures d’Art Plastiques St-Luc et Erg, Brussels. Pelzer has published widely on literature, feminism and contemporary art in monographs, catalogues and periodicals. desa philippi is a writer and art historian based in London. Her art criticism has appeared in Artforum, October, Artscribe International, Art&Design, Third Text, Parachute and the Oxford Art Journal. anne rorimer specializes in post-war art, with an emphasis on the 1960s and ’70s. A former curator in the Department of Twentieth-century Painting and Sculpture at the Art Institute of Chicago, she has published widely on Conceptual art and was co-curator of Reconsidering the Object of Art: 1965–1975, organized by the Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles, in 1995–6. peter wollen is Professor of Film Studies and chair of the Department of Film and Television at the University of California, Los Angeles. He is the author of Signs and Meaning in the Cinema (1969), Raiding the Icebox: Reflections on Twentieth-Century Culture (1993) and Singin’ in the Rain (1993). william wood is a critic and art historian with numerous publications on contemporary art. He has held editorial posts with C magazine, Vanguard and Parachute, and has taught at the Slade School of Fine Art, London, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver. Introduction jon bird and michael newman This book is not a history of Conceptual art. It does not make any claims to a geographically comprehensive coverage and it does not advocate a conceptual-type approach to art practice as superseding other approaches or definitively breaking down the barrier of the aesthetic. So what are our aims in compiling this collection of essays? As the title sug- gests, the book looks at ways in which Conceptual art is currently being ‘rewritten’, gathering together, for the first time in a single volume, con- tributions from a number – although by no means all – of the younger art historians who have been researching the movement and are beginning to publish, as well as pieces by critics and historians who were contemporary with, or followed closely on, the development of the movement. We have also attempted to indicate the importance of the extension of the history of Conceptual art (or ‘Conceptualism’ in its broader sense) to include centres other than North America and Western Europe; indeed, to recog- nize its local specificity and its global reach – a project that has already been pursued on a larger scale by the important exhibition Global Conceptualism: Points of Origin, 1950s–1980s, initiated by the Queens Museum of Art, New York, in 1999.1 Furthermore, the process of ‘rewrit- ing’ is one of reflection and reinterpretation, leading to a reassessment of historical and critical evaluations in the context of new insights from both theory and practice. The trace of Conceptualism in contemporary work is addressed here, as well as essays which review a specific moment in the narratives of Conceptual art, or reconsider the significance of par- ticular artists and their relationship to media forms, institutions and sites for practice. The increasing importance in both art practice and the expanding field of studies in visual culture of the museum as an expression of national, cultural and ideological interests, of strategies and techniques of classifi- cation and modes of display, and of the interrelationship between the institutions and contexts in which artworks are located, is reflected in 2 jon bird and michael newman essays by Jon Bird, William Wood and Michael Newman. Bird’s essay on Robert Morris’s 1971 Tate Gallery retrospective examines an early moment in Conceptual art’s critique of social and cultural value systems and the possibility of a different kind of relation between work and viewer, and emphazises the porousness of the categories of Conceptual art, Minimalism and performance.
Recommended publications
  • Tate Papers Issue 12 2009: Antony Hudek
    Tate Papers Issue 12 2009: Antony Hudek http://www.tate.org.uk/research/tateresearch/tatepapers/09autumn/hudek... ISSN 1753-9854 TATE’S ONLINE RESEARCH JOURNAL Landmark Exhibitions Issue From Over- to Sub-Exposure: The Anamnesis of Les Immatériaux Antony Hudek Although a number of twentieth-century exhibitions are already hailed as ‘landmark exhibitions’, one major and highly innovative exhibition has eluded the attention of scholars until recently: Les Immatériaux , co-curated in 1985 for the Centre Georges Pompidou in Paris by the philosopher Jean-François Lyotard and the design historian and theorist Thierry Chaput. 1 Among its many novel features was the fact that it was the first exhibition in which a philosopher played a leading role, opening the door to many other instances where intellectuals would become ad hoc curators. 2 Instead of the standard sequence of white cubes, Lyotard and Chaput divided the entire fifth floor of the museum with large sheets of uncoloured metal mesh hanging from the ceiling. Contrary to the neutral lighting of most exhibition environments, Les Immatériaux offered a theatrical setting – the work of young stage designer Françoise Michel – which played with stark contrasts between spotlit exhibits and areas of near total darkness.3 In Chaput’s words: ‘Decked in demanding grey, illuminated by improbable lighting, with unpredictable ideas allowed to hover, this hour, this day in this year, suspended, rigorously ordered yet without system, “The Immaterials” exhibit themselves between seeing, feeling and hearing.’ 4 Importantly, Les Immatériaux brought together a striking variety of objects, ranging from the latest industrial robots and personal computers, to holograms, interactive sound installations, and 3D cinema, along with paintings, photographs and sculptures (the latter ranging from an Ancient Egyptian low-relief to works by Dan Graham , Joseph Kosuth and Giovanni Anselmo ).
    [Show full text]
  • The Conceptual Art Game a Coloring Game Inspired by the Ideas of Postmodern Artist Sol Lewitt
    Copyright © 2020 Blick Art Materials All rights reserved 800-447-8192 DickBlick.com The Conceptual Art Game A coloring game inspired by the ideas of postmodern artist Sol LeWitt. Solomon (Sol) LeWitt (1928-2007), one of the key pioneers of conceptual art, noted that, “Each person draws a line differently and each person understands words differently.” When he was working for architect I.M. Pei, LeWitt noted that an architect Materials (required) doesn't build his own design, yet he is still Graph or Grid paper, recommend considered an artist. A composer requires choice of: musicians to make his creation a reality. Koala Sketchbook, Circular Grid, He deduced that art happens before it 8.5" x 8.5", 30 sheets (13848- becomes something viewable, when it is 1085); share two across class conceived in the mind of the artist. Canson Foundation Graph Pad, 8" x 8" grid, 8.5" x 11" pad, 40 He said, “When an artist uses a conceptual sheets, (10636-2885); share two form of art, it means that all of the planning across class and decisions are made beforehand and Choice of color materials, the execution is a perfunctory affair. The recommend: idea becomes a machine that makes the Blick Studio Artists' Colored art.” Pencils, set of 12 (22063-0129); Over the course of his career, LeWitt share one set between two students produced approximately 1,350 designs known as “Wall Drawings” to be completed at specific sites. Faber-Castell DuoTip Washable Markers, set of 12 (22314-0129); The unusual thing is that he rarely painted one share one set between two himself.
    [Show full text]
  • Hans Rottenhammer's Use of Networks in the Copper
    arts Article Intermediaries and the Market: Hans Rottenhammer’s Use of Networks in the Copper Painting Market Sophia Quach McCabe Department of History of Art and Architecture, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA; [email protected] Received: 1 February 2019; Accepted: 16 June 2019; Published: 24 June 2019 Abstract: In Willem van Haecht’s Gallery of Cornelis van der Geest, The Last Judgment by the German artist Hans Rottenhammer stands prominently in the foreground. Signed and dated 1598, it is one of many copper panel paintings Rottenhammer produced and sent north of the Alps during his decade-long sojourn in Venice. That the work was valued alongside those of Renaissance masters raises questions about Rottenhammer’s artistic status and how the painting reached Antwerp. This essay examines Rottenhammer’s international market as a function of his relationships with artist-friends and agents, especially those in Venice’s German merchant community. By employing digital visualization tools alongside the study of archival documents, the essay attends to the intermediary connections within a social network, and their effects on the art market. It argues for Rottenhammer’s use of—and negotiation with—intermediaries to establish an international career. Through digital platforms, such as ArcGIS and Palladio, the artist’s patronage group is shown to have shifted geographically, from multiple countries around 1600 to Germany and Antwerp after 1606, when he relocated to Augsburg. Yet, the same trusted friends and associates he had established in Italy continued to participate in Rottenhammer’s business of art. Keywords: Hans Rottenhammer; social network; intermediaries; mediation; digital humanities; digital art history; merchants; art market; copper painting; Jan Brueghel the Elder 1.
    [Show full text]
  • All These Post-1965 Movements Under the “Conceptual Art” Umbrella
    All these post-1965 movements under the “conceptual art” umbrella- Postminimalism or process art, Site Specific works, Conceptual art movement proper, Performance art, Body Art and all combinations thereof- move the practice of art away from art-as-autonomous object, and art-as-commodification, and towards art-as-experience, where subject becomes object, hierarchy between subject and object is critiqued and intersubjectivity of artist, viewer and artwork abounds! Bruce Nauman, Live-Taped Video Corridor, 1970, Conceptual Body art, Postmodern beginning “As opposed to being viewers of the work, once again they are viewers in it.” (“Subject as Object,” p. 199) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IrqXiqgQBo A Postmodern beginning: Body art and Performance art as critique of art-as-object recap: -Bruce Nauman -Vito Acconci focus on: -Chris Burden -Richard Serra -Carolee Schneemann - Hannah Wilke Chapter 3, pp. 114-132 (Carolee Schneemann and Hannah Wilke, First Generation Feminism) Bruce Nauman, Bouncing Two Balls Between the Floor and Ceiling with Changing Rhythms, 1967-1968. 16mm film transferred to video (black and white, sound), 10 min. Body art/Performance art, Postmodern beginning- performed elementary gestures in the privacy of his studio and documented them in a variety of media Vito Acconci, Following Piece, 1969, Body art, Performance art- outside the studio, Postmodern beginning Video documentation of the event Print made from bite mark Vito Acconci, Trademarks, 1970, Body art, Performance art, Postmodern beginning Video and Print documentation
    [Show full text]
  • EDUCATOR GUIDE Story Theme: the Grey Eminences Subject: David Ireland Discipline: Visual Art (Conceptual)
    EDUCATOR GUIDE Story Theme: The Grey Eminences Subject: David Ireland Discipline: Visual Art (Conceptual) SECTION I - OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................2 EPISODE THEME SUBJECT CURRICULUM CONNECTIONS OBJECTIVE STORY SYNOPSIS INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES EQUIPMENT NEEDED MATERIALS NEEDED INTELLIGENCES ADDRESSED SECTION II – CONTENT/CONTEXT ..................................................................................................3 CONTENT OVERVIEW THE BIG PICTURE RESOURCES – TEXTS RESOURCES – WEBSITES RESOURCES – VIDEO BAY AREA FIELD TRIPS SELECTED CONCEPTUAL ARTISTS SECTION III – VOCABULARY.............................................................................................................9 SECTION IV – ENGAGING WITH SPARK ...................................................................................... 10 Artist David Ireland beside the entrance to his retrospective exhibition at the Berkeley Art Museum. Still image from SPARK story, 2004. SECTION I - OVERVIEW To learn to “read” Conceptual Artworks and EPISODE THEME understand how they communicate The Grey Eminences To help students think conceptually by looking at, talking about and making conceptual art SUBJECT To introduce students to creative ideation by David Ireland beginning instead of materials GRADE RANGES K-12 & Post-secondary EQUIPMENT NEEDED SPARK story about David Ireland on DVD or VHS CURRICULUM CONNECTIONS and related equipment Visual Art
    [Show full text]
  • Installation Art in India: Concepts and Roots
    [Aaftab *, Vol.4 (Iss.10): October, 2016] ISSN- 2350-0530(O) ISSN- 2394-3629(P) IF: 4.321 (CosmosImpactFactor), 2.532 (I2OR) Arts INSTALLATION ART IN INDIA: CONCEPTS AND ROOTS Mohsina Aaftab *1 *1 Research Scholar, Department of Fine Arts, A.M.U., Aligarh, INDIA DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.164831 ABSTRACT Present study focuses on the new media Installation Art in India, its present scenario, and backgrounds. Essentially installation art has taken its heritage from conceptual art, which came into prominence in 1970s, when the concept or idea was prominent – when an artist uses a conceptual form of art which means that all of the arrangement and conclusion are made previously and the implementation is an obligatory concern. So, spontaneously idea became a machine that makes the art. An idea suddenly pops in his mind and he just implemented it, in his very own way. This kind of art does not narrow itself to gallery spaces and can refer to any materials intervention in everyday public or private spaces. After India became independent, art began to change here. considerately several movements and group bounced up all over the country headed by ambitious young artists with vision of bringing modern art to India. Now the art of India is totally changed. Contemporaries are not bound to use paper and canvas, wall or any other art surfaces. They are not bound to make mythological paintings or sculptures but they are free to do anything, they are free to use any medium, material and space they want. After a European artist Marcel Duchamp’s “ready-mades artist” started exploring the margin of art, trying to eliminate the contrast between art and life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Post-Duchamp Deal. Remarks on a Few Specifications of the Word ‘Art’
    Filozofski vestnik volume/letnik XXviii • number/Številka 2 • 2007 • 27–38 The Post-Duchamp DeAl. Remarks on A FeW sPeCiFications oF tHe Word ‘art’ thierry de Duve When people began to talk in the ’60s of interdisciplinary trends in art, using terms such as ‘mixed media’, ‘intermedia’ and ‘multimedia art’, the primary focus was on finding a place for the new and quite diverse practices that could not be assigned to the traditional categories of painting and sculp- ture. those new names, as well as the descriptive terms ‘performance art’ or ‘installation art’, which were also new at that time, had a merely journalistic character. However, a more serious theoretical debate was simultaneously taking shape around Pop, Minimal and Conceptual Art, a debate in which the growing influence of Marcel Duchamp on this generation of artists and the impact of the readymade on artistic theories were palpable. By the end of the decade, the debate had reached academia. Philosophers who rarely set foot inside a gallery began to question the very concept of art, exemplified by borderline cases that were either real, such as Duchamp’s readymades and other ‘found objects’, or imaginary, such as the five red monochromes, identical but bearing different titles, which Arthur Danto (who does visit galleries more often than not) wittily proposed at the beginning of his book, The Transfiguration of the Commonplace.1 During the ’80s, my own work on the readymade has led me to study the relationship of painting, in particular, to art, in general, and then to develop an aesthetic theory of art as proper name, the result of a somewhat unexpected meeting of Duchamp with immanuel kant.2 What motivated me at the time was the mixture of excitement and anxiety produced by a situation that was an obvious legacy of the ready- made, namely, the radical openness of art (in the singular) resulting from 1 Arthur Danto, The Transfiguration of the Commonplace (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • AP Art History Unit Sheet #21 Romanticism, Realism, and Photography
    AP Art History Unit Sheet #21 Romanticism, Realism, and Photography Works of Art Artist Medium Date Page # 27‐1: Napoleon at the Plague House at Jaffa Gros Painting 1804 754 27‐2: Coronation of Napoleon David Painting 1805‐1808 757 27‐4: Pauline Borghese as Venus Canova Sculpture 1808 759 27‐6: Apotheosis of Homer Ingres Painting 1827 761 27‐7: Grande Odalisque Ingres Painting 1814 761 27‐8: The Nightmare Fuseli Painting 1781 762 27‐9: Ancient of Days Blake Painting 1794 763 27‐10: The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters Goya Painting 1798 763 27‐11: Third of May, 1808 Goya Painting 1814‐1815 764 27‐13: The Raft of the Medusa Gericault Painting 1819 765 27‐16: Liberty Leading the People Delacrois Painting 1830 768 27‐19: Abbey in the Oak Forest Friedrich Painting 1810 771 27‐21: The Haywain Constable Painting 1821 772 27‐22: The Slave Ship Turner Painting 1840 773 27‐23: The Oxbow ColePainting1836 773 27‐26: The Stone Breakers Courbet Painting 1849 775 27‐27: Burial at Ornans Courbet Painting 1849 776 27‐28: The Gleaners Millet Painting 1857 777 27‐30: Third Class Carriage Daumier Painting 1862 779 27‐31: The Horse Fair Bonheur Painting 1853‐1855 780 27‐32: Le Dejeauner sure l’herbe Manet Painting 1863 781 27‐33: Olympia Manet Painting 1863 781 27‐35: Veteran in a New Field Homer Painting 1865 783 27‐36: The Gross Clinic Eakins Painting 1875 783 27‐37: The Daughters of Edward Darley Boit Sargent Painting 1882 784 27‐38: The Thankful Poor Tanner Painting 1894 785 27‐40: Ophelia Millais Painting 1852 786 27‐43: House of Parliament, London Pugin/ Barry Architecture 1835 788 27‐44: Royal Pavilion, Brighton Nash Architecture 1815‐1818 789 27‐45: Paris Opera Garnier Architecture 1861‐1874 789 27‐48: Still Life in Studio Daguerre Photography 1837 792 27‐51: Nadar Raising Photography to the Height of Art Daumier Lithograph 1862 794 27‐53: A Harvest of Death, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania O’Sullivan Photography 1863 795 27‐54: Horse Galloping Muybridge Calotype 1878 796 CONTEXT ­ Europe and France 1.
    [Show full text]
  • HARD FACTS and SOFT SPECULATION Thierry De Duve
    THE STORY OF FOUNTAIN: HARD FACTS AND SOFT SPECULATION Thierry de Duve ABSTRACT Thierry de Duve’s essay is anchored to the one and perhaps only hard fact that we possess regarding the story of Fountain: its photo in The Blind Man No. 2, triply captioned “Fountain by R. Mutt,” “Photograph by Alfred Stieglitz,” and “THE EXHIBIT REFUSED BY THE INDEPENDENTS,” and the editorial on the facing page, titled “The Richard Mutt Case.” He examines what kind of agency is involved in that triple “by,” and revisits Duchamp’s intentions and motivations when he created the fictitious R. Mutt, manipulated Stieglitz, and set a trap to the Independents. De Duve concludes with an invitation to art historians to abandon the “by” questions (attribution, etc.) and to focus on the “from” questions that arise when Fountain is not seen as a work of art so much as the bearer of the news that the art world has radically changed. KEYWORDS, Readymade, Fountain, Independents, Stieglitz, Sanitary pottery Then the smell of wet glue! Mentally I was not spelling art with a capital A. — Beatrice Wood1 No doubt, Marcel Duchamp’s best known and most controversial readymade is a men’s urinal tipped on its side, signed R. Mutt, dated 1917, and titled Fountain. The 2017 centennial of Fountain brought us a harvest of new books and articles on the famous or infamous urinal. I read most of them in the hope of gleaning enough newly verified facts to curtail my natural tendency to speculate. But newly verified facts are few and far between.
    [Show full text]
  • Art in the Mirror: Reflection in the Work of Rauschenberg, Richter, Graham and Smithson
    ART IN THE MIRROR: REFLECTION IN THE WORK OF RAUSCHENBERG, RICHTER, GRAHAM AND SMITHSON DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Eileen R. Doyle, M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Stephen Melville, Advisor Professor Lisa Florman ______________________________ Professor Myroslava Mudrak Advisor History of Art Graduate Program Copyright by Eileen Reilly Doyle 2004 ii ABSTRACT This dissertation considers the proliferation of mirrors and reflective materials in art since the sixties through four case studies. By analyzing the mirrored and reflective work of Robert Rauschenberg, Gerhard Richter, Dan Graham and Robert Smithson within the context of the artists' larger oeuvre and also the theoretical and self-reflective writing that surrounds each artist’s work, the relationship between the wide use of industrially-produced materials and the French theory that dominated artistic discourse for the past thirty years becomes clear. Chapter 2 examines the work of Robert Rauschenberg, noting his early interest in engaging the viewer’s body in his work—a practice that became standard with the rise of Minimalism and after. Additionally, the theoretical writing the French phenomenologist Maurice Merleau-Ponty provides insight into the link between art as a mirroring practice and a physically engaged viewer. Chapter 3 considers the questions of medium and genre as they arose in the wake of Minimalism, using the mirrors and photo-based paintings of Gerhard Richter as its focus. It also addresses the particular way that Richter weaves the motifs and concerns of traditional painting into a rhetoric of the death of painting which strongly implicates the mirror, ultimately opening up Richter’s career to a psychoanalytic reading drawing its force from Jacques Lacan’s writing on the formation of the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Body in Chinese Art
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Philosophy Faculty Research and Publications Philosophy, Department of 1-1-2011 The olitP ical Body in Chinese Art Curtis Carter Marquette University, [email protected] Accepted Version. "The oP litical Body in Chinese Art" in Subversive Strategies in Contemporary Chinese Art. Eds. Mary Bittner Wiseman and Yuedi Liu. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2011: 109-125. DOI: DOI. © 2011 Brill. Used with permission. NOT THE PUBLISHED VERSION; this is the author’s final, peer-reviewed manuscript. The published version may be accessed by following the link in the citation at the bottom of the page. The Political Body in Chinese Art Curtis L. Carter Department of Philosophy, Marquette University Milwaukee, WI The uses of visual images based on calligraphy and the depiction of the human body in Chinese art have served an important role in the exercise of political power by leaders in Chinese culture. The two media that are most closely linked to the exercise of political power in Chinese culture are written or performed calligraphy and representational art featuring the human figure. The latter is more familiar in western nations where one often finds sculptures of political figures displayed in prominent public spaces. However, in China calligraphy as a form of written art serves as a principal symbolic expression of political power. This is true in both traditional Chinese culture and also the Twentieth Century revolutionary period and beyond. The connection between figurative political images and political power needs little explanation for a western audience. But how is calligraphy connected to the theme of the political body in Chinese art and culture? One answer is offered in Mao Zedong’s early writings, where he linked the practice of calligraphy to physical training of the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions of Feminism
    AYISHAABRAHAM (Question 2) I wonder if it is possible to demarcatethe 1960s and '80s in termsof clearly distinguishablecategories of "grassroots" and "theory."Would our understanding be where it is without the pathbreaking grass roots-theoreticalwork done by activists/artists/theoristswho have traditionallybelonged to marginalized communities? The issue of formationsand expressionsof subjectivityin and throughart is crucialhere. In the United States,with the help of the popular pressand media, politics tends to be reduced to essentializedand deterministicnotions of race, ethnicity,femininity, otherness, etc. This convenientlycloaks all the othercategories thathave not been legitimizedwithin the classicself/other binary debates. In a recentarticle entitled "Interior Colonies: Franz Fanon and the Politics of Identification,"Diana Fuss locates psychoanalyticdiscourse and the politicsof identificationwithin colonial historyand otherhistorical genealogies: It therefore becomes necessary for the colonizer to subject the colonial other to a double command: be like me, don't be like me; be mimeticallyidentical, be totallyother. The colonial other is situated somewherebetween differenceand similitude,at the vanishingpoint of subjectivity.' While it is stillhard forartists from marginalized communities to negotiatetheir identities within the context of the art world, there are manywho have used strategies such as autobiography to explore a history that has never been interrogatedbefore. The problem only arises when termssuch as "the body," "autobiography,"etc., are taken out of their historical contexts and thrown around like disembodiedand rarefiedconcepts. I findmyself becoming more conscious of the extentto whichmy work has to be informedboth by theoreticalanalyses and directpractical engagement with complex issues of subjectivity,identity, etc. I feel the need to look at the specifics of these issues.It is the politicsof processthat interests me.
    [Show full text]