DOCSLIB.ORG

Art in the Mirror: Reflection in the Work of Rauschenberg, Richter, Graham and Smithson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ART IN THE MIRROR: REFLECTION IN THE WORK OF RAUSCHENBERG, RICHTER, GRAHAM AND SMITHSON DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Eileen R. Doyle, M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Stephen Melville, Advisor Professor Lisa Florman ______________________________ Professor Myroslava Mudrak Advisor History of Art Graduate Program Copyright by Eileen Reilly Doyle 2004 ii ABSTRACT This dissertation considers the proliferation of mirrors and reflective materials in art since the sixties through four case studies. By analyzing the mirrored and reflective work of Robert Rauschenberg, Gerhard Richter, Dan Graham and Robert Smithson within the context of the artists' larger oeuvre and also the theoretical and self-reflective writing that surrounds each artist’s work, the relationship between the wide use of industrially-produced materials and the French theory that dominated artistic discourse for the past thirty years becomes clear. Chapter 2 examines the work of Robert Rauschenberg, noting his early interest in engaging the viewer’s body in his work—a practice that became standard with the rise of Minimalism and after. Additionally, the theoretical writing the French phenomenologist Maurice Merleau-Ponty provides insight into the link between art as a mirroring practice and a physically engaged viewer. Chapter 3 considers the questions of medium and genre as they arose in the wake of Minimalism, using the mirrors and photo-based paintings of Gerhard Richter as its focus. It also addresses the particular way that Richter weaves the motifs and concerns of traditional painting into a rhetoric of the death of painting which strongly implicates the mirror, ultimately opening up Richter’s career to a psychoanalytic reading drawing its force from Jacques Lacan’s writing on the formation of the subject. Chapter 4 extends these considerations to address the role of the viewer and the question of time and ii history through an analysis of the work and writing of Dan Graham, which draw on both Merleau-Ponty’s and Lacan’s theories of vision. And finally, Chapter 5 focuses on the work, writings and aesthetic theory of Robert Smithson, addressing the way that Smithson explicitly put his art and writing into an interdependent relationship, insisting that art is ultimately displaced into writing. Taken together, the case studies describe the way reflection both as a practice and as material choice defined some of the most notable trends in the artistic discourse of the last forty years. iii For Todd iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my adviser, Stephen Melville, for intellectual support, encouragement and enthusiasm, which made this dissertation possible. I am grateful to Lisa Florman and Myroslava Mudrak for their incisive suggestions in crafting the text and for their long-standing commitment to this project. I also wish to thank Dan Graham, Anne Rorimer, Gerhard Gruitrooy, Kim Masteller and Donovan Dodrill for their stimulating discussions about the contents of this dissertation in its early stages. I am indebted to my friends and family for their continued support throughout this project and their unstinting confidence in it and in me. Most especially, I am grateful to my husband, Todd Doyle, who has served as editor, proofreader and cheerleader. Without his support and sacrifice, this dissertation would not have been possible. v VITA November 21, 1968 Born – New Haven, CT 1995 M.A. Art History, University of South Florida 1999 – present Researcher, Art Resource, Inc., New York, NY 2000 - present Instructor, School of Continuing and Professional Studies, New York University PUBLICATIONS 1. E. Doyle, “Dan Graham,” “Robert Rauschenberg,” and “Robert Smithson,” entries for Encyclopedia of Postmodernism. Victor E. Taylor and Charles E. Winquist, eds. London and New York: Routledge, 2000; 161-162, 331-332, 372-373. 2. E. Doyle, T. Timmons, eds. One-Off (exhibition catalogue). Tampa, FL: Florida Center for Contemporary Art, 1994. FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: History of Art vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract…….……………………………………………………………………………..ii Dedication..…………………………………………………………………………...…..iv Acknowledgments………..……………………………………………………………….v Vita…………………………………………………………………………………….….vi List of Figures ………………………………………………………………………...….ix Chapters: 1. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………..1 1.1 Mirrors and Art ……………………………………………………………..3 1.2 Reflection and Minimalism ……………………….………………………..6 1.3 Mirrors in French Theory …………………………………………………10 1.4 Language, Writing and Vision ………………………………………..…...12 1.5 The Discourse Surrounding Mirrors in Recent Art …………………….….14 1.6 The Reflective Work of Rauschenberg, Richter, Graham and Smithson ……………………………………………………………………18 1.7 A Short Note on the Terms of the Argument...…………………………..…24 2. Robert Rauschenberg: Mirrors of Art and Life …………………………….…..26 2.1 Mirrors as a Collage Material ………………………………………...…….28 2.2 Depicted Mirrors in the Silk-screens ……………………………………….32 2.3 Silk-screening on Reflective Materials ……………………………………..37 2.4 Reflection and Viewer Interaction ………………………………………….41 2.5 The White Paintings as Empty Mirrors ………………………………..……45 2.6 Mirrors and Language ………………………………………………….……53 3. Gerhard Richter’s Mirrors: Memento Mori or Monochrome? …………………..57 3.1 Glass, Windows and Curtains …………………………………….…………59 3.2 The Silvered Mirrors of 1981 …………………………………...…………..69 3.3 Painted Mirrors in the Early 1990s …………………………………….……76 3.4 History, Death and Memory ………………………………………….……..82 3.5 Reflection as an Interpretive Practice ………………………………….……87 vii 4. Dan Graham: A Theater of Vision …………………………………………...91 4.1 Published Art/Public Viewing …………………………………..………..92 4.2 The Viewer in Time and Place …………………………………………...95 4.3 Theater of Vision …………………………………………………………100 4.4 Photography as Symbolic Form …………………………………………...112 5. Robert Smithson: The Abstract Mirror ………………………………….…….122 5.1 1964-1965: The Vestiges of Minimalism …………………………...……..125 5.2 1966-1968: Limits and Layers ……………………………………...……...134 5.3 1968-1970: “A Thing is a Hole in a Thing It is not” ………………….…...138 6. Conclusion ………………………………………………………………..……153 Endnotes …………………………………………………………………………..…....160 Bibliography ………………………………………………………………………..….189 Appendix A: Figures……….…………………………...………………………………201 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Lukas Furtenagle, The Artist Hans Burgkmair and his Wife, Anna, 1529….202 2 The Mirror of Death, from a Book of Hours, c. 1480…………………….….202 3 Quentin Metsys, St. Luke Painting the Virgin and Child, 1530……………..202 4 Henri Matisse, Carmelina, 1903…………………………………………..…..202 5 Marcia Painting her Self-Portrait, 15th century………………………….…....202 6 Juan Gris, Le Lavabo, 1912…………………………………………………….202 7 Vladimir Tatlin, The Bottle, 1912……………………………………………..203 8 Gino Severini, The Bal Tabarin, 1912……………………………………..….203 9 Constantine Brancusi, Sleeping Muse, 1909…………………………………203 10 Robert Morris, Untitled (Mirror Cubes), 1965….…………………….……..203 11 Frank Stella, Empress of India, 1965…………………………..……………...203 12 Hans Holbein, The French Ambassadors, 1533………………………………203 13 Michelangelo Pistoletto, Person Seen from the Back, 1962…………….……204 13 Donald Judd, Untitled, 1968………………………….………………………204 15 Lucas Samaras, Room #2, 1966…………………………………………..…...204 16 Adrian Piper, Installation view of Black Box and White Box, 1992…….…204 17 Piper, interior of Black Box, 1992………………………………………….…204 ix 18 Robert Rauschenberg, Charlene, 1954…………………………………….…204 19 Rauschenberg, Minutiae, 1954……………………………………………….205 20 Rauschenberg, Big D Ellipse, 1990…………………………………………...205 21 Rauschenberg, Ballast, 1987………………………………………………….205 22 Rauschenberg, Favor-Rites, 1988……………………………………………..205 23 Rauschenberg, Soundings, 1968……………………………………………...205 24 Rauschenberg, Solstice, 1968…………………………………………………205 25 Rauschenberg, Revolver, 1968………………………………………………..206 26 Rauschenberg, Audition, from Carnal Clocks, 1968…………………….…..206 27 Rauschenberg, Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno, 1958-1960……….………..206 28 Rauschenberg, White Painting, 1951………………………………………...206 29 Rauschenberg, Retroactive II, 1964…………………………………………..206 30 Rauschenberg, Press, 1964………………………………………..…………..206 31 Rauschenberg, Female Figure, 1950………………………………………….207 32 Rauschenberg, Tracer, 1963…………………………………………………..207 33 Rauschenberg, Transom, 1963………………………………………………..207 34 Gerhard Richter, Table, 1962…………………………………………………207 35 Richter, Dead I, 1988…………………………………………………………..207 36 Richter, 1024 Colors, 1973…………………………………………………….207 37 Richter, Abstract Picture, 1992………………………………………………..208 38 Richter, Installation view of Eight Gray, 2001……………………...………208 39 Richter, Four Panes of Glass, 1967……………………………………………208 x 40 Georges Braque, Le Portugais, 1911-12……………………..……………….208 41 Marcel Duchamp, The Large Glass, 1915-23,………………………….…….208 42 Richter, Ema (Nude and Staircase), 1966…………………..…………………208 43 Richter, Woman Descending the Staircase, 1965..…………………………….209 44 Duchamp, Nude Descending a Staircase, 1912………….……………….…...209 45 Richter, Uncle Rudi, 1965………………………………………...…………...209 46 Richter, Installation of Pane of Glass I & II, 1977……….…………………..209 47 Richter, Double Pane of Glass, 1977……………………...…………………...209 48 Richter, Betty, 1977………………………………………...………………….209 49 Richter, Self-Portrait, 1996………………………..…………………………..210 50 Richter, Mirror and Mirror, both 1981……………………………….……...210 51 Richter, Mirror, 1981…………………………………...……………………..210 52 Richter, Two Candles, 1983……………………………………………………210
Recommended publications
  • University of Groningen the Mirror Image Muda, G.E

    University of Groningen the Mirror Image Muda, G.E

    University of Groningen The mirror image Muda, G.E. IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2011 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Muda, G. E. (2011). The mirror image: The representation of social roles for women in novels by Charlotte Brontë, Kate Chopin, Edith Wharton and Jean Rhys. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 26-09-2021 G.E. MUDA The Mirror Image THE MIRROR IMAGE Front cover illustration: Albert Roelofs, Toekomstdromen, [Future Dreams], 1906 Cover Design: Dr. J. B. Hemel Printed by: GrafiMedia, Groningen ISBN: 978-90-367-4648-9 (printed version) ISBN: 978-90-367-4647-2 (electronic version) Copyright: G.E. Muda (2011) Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden vermenigvuldigd zonder schriftelijke toestemming van de auteur.
  • MIRROR MIRROR the Mind’S Mirror FILMS Seaglass 4 Restaurant 5 Outdoor Exhibits with Zarinah Agnew 7:30 P.M

    MIRROR MIRROR the Mind’S Mirror FILMS Seaglass 4 Restaurant 5 Outdoor Exhibits with Zarinah Agnew 7:30 P.M

    AFTER DARK AFTER DARK SCHEDULE MAP PRESENTATIONS ACTIVITIES Upper Level Bay Observatory Gallery and Terrace 6 Observing Landscapes Mirrors in Technology and Art Through the Looking Glass Mirrors in Technology and Art With Sebastian Martin With the Explainers 6 With Sebastian Martin 6:30–8:30 p.m. | Bay Observatory Gallery 6:30–9:30 p.m. | Central Gallery 6:30–8:30 p.m. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2015 A Reflection on Mirrors Light Boxes and Anamorphic Mirrors The History of Mirrors 6:00—10:00 P.M. With Ron Hipschman With Explorables With Massimo Mazzotti 7:00 and 9:00 p.m. 7:00–10:00 p.m. | Central Gallery Main Level 8:30 p.m. Phyllis C. Wattis Webcast Studio BAR North Gallery MIRROR MIRROR The Mind’s Mirror FILMS SeaGlass 4 Restaurant 5 Outdoor Exhibits With Zarinah Agnew 7:30 p.m. | Kanbar Forum On Reflection East Gallery 9:00 p.m. | Kanbar Forum 4 Living Systems The History of Mirrors East With Massimo Mazzotti Corridor Contemplando la Ciudad (2005, 4 min.) Central Gallery 8:30 p.m. | Bay Observatory Gallery by Angela Reginato 5 3 Seeing & Listening Visions of a City (1978, 8 min.) by Lawrence Jordan A Reflection on Mirrors INSTALLATIONS BAR 3 With Ron Hipschman Suspended 2 (2005, 5 min.) by Amy Hicks Wattis 7:00 and 9:00 p.m. The Infinity Boxes Webcast Phyllis C. Wattis Webcast Studio Studio By Matt Elson Pier 15 (2013, 4 min.) by Michael Rudnick 6:00–10:00 p.m. | Central Gallery The Infinity Boxes By Matt Elson Visible Spectres 6:00–10:00 p.m.
  • Press Release: Jose Dávila, Das Muss

    Press Release: Jose Dávila, Das Muss

    Press Release: Jose Dávila, Das muss der Ort sein. Opening: September 6, 2013 at 6.00 pm, the artist will be present. Exhibition: September 7 through November 2, 2013. We inaugurate on September 6 during DC-Open Das muss der Ort sein (This Must Be the Place), our second exhibition with the Mexican artist Jose Dávila (born 1974 in Guadalajara, Mexico). It is his first exhibition in the Rhineland. We are glad to show five sculptures and three of his Cut-outs. Cut-outs are works for which Dávila cuts away the central objects from enlarged re- productions of iconic architectures or artworks in order to induce our imagination or cultural memory to complete the images. By framing these images (or what remains of them) between two sheets of glass, a new spatial image is created in particular by the voids. Because there is a shadow cast on the back of the frame. One could say: the depicted object leaves, a new object comes. In our current exhibition the removed objects are artworks from the last 60 years, that is, sculptures and installations by Giovanni Anselmo, Joseph Beuys, Marcel Broodthaers, Alexander Calder, Anthony Caro, Liam Gillick, Michael Heizer, Norbert Kricke, Richard Long, Walter de Maria, Cildo Meireless, Bruce Nauman, Michelangelo Pistoletto, Richard Serra or Tony Smith. Many of these works belong to the canon of art history. Even if we do not immediately know who was the author of the removed object, we feel – as a knowledgeable viewer – that we know the works and that we have them in our mind's eye.
  • Sylvia Plath: a Split in the Mirror Susan E

    Sylvia Plath: a Split in the Mirror Susan E

    Plath Profiles 55 Sylvia Plath: A Split in the Mirror Susan E. Schwartz, Ph.D. I sit… Composed in Grecian tunic and psyche-knot, Rooted to your black look, the play turned tragic: Which such blight wrought on our bankrupt estate, What ceremony of words can patch the havoc? "Conversation Among the Ruins" (Plath, Collected Poems 21) Sylvia Plath's writing depicts the anguish of an unresolved and ambivalent attachment with her father. Her poetry, dreams and journal writings reveal the complexities of this relationship, its unconscious strands and blurred boundaries. Through the example of this poetess who killed herself at the age of thirty, I aim to show the complex interactions between daughters and fathers and the line between creativity and destruction. The death of Sylvia Plath's father when she was eight was a decisive experience shaping her life, an aspect drawing her towards death and representing the profound deprivation of this significant parental figure. She wrote in the poem, "Daddy": I was ten when they buried you. At twenty I tried to die and get back, back, back to you. (224) Sylvia Plath's words reverberate with paradox, graphically detailing extreme aspects of the distress of a daughter due to traumatic loss of her father. From the psychological destruction of this loss, she creatively wrote about its individual and collective proportions. She addresses the symptoms of our era—the media hype of women, technology and culture—all signifying spiritual, psychological and cultural lack. The passion fostering her creativity, however, is connected to a crushing father-complex affecting her attempts to transform in life which fought those forces uniting with her father in death.
  • 2000 Stainless Steels: an Introduction to Their Metallurgy and Corrosion

    2000 Stainless Steels: an Introduction to Their Metallurgy and Corrosion

    Dairy, Food and Environmental Sanitation, Vol. 20, No. 7, Pages 506-517 Copyright© International Association for Food Protection, 6200 Aurora Ave., Suite 200W, Des Moines, IA 50322 Stainless Steels: An Introduction to Their Metallurgy and Corrosion Resistance Roger A. Covert and Arthur H. Tuthill* and why they sometimes do not. In most cases, selection of the proper stainless steel leads to satisfactory performance. COMPOSITION, NOMEN- CLATURE AND GENERAL PROPERTIES Most metals are mixtures of a primary metallic element and one or more intentionally added other ele- This article has been peer-reviewed by two professionals. ments. These mixtures of elements are called alloys. Stainless steels are alloys, as are brasses (copper + zinc), bronzes (copper + tin), the many alu- INTRODUCTION better understanding of stainless minum alloys, and many other me- Worldwide, in industry, in busi- steels, especially to the non-metal- tallic materials. In general, solid ness and in the home, metals called lurgist. metals and alloys consist of randomly stainless steels are used daily. It is Industries are concerned with oriented grains that have a well-de- important to understand what these integrity of equipment and product fined crystalline structure, or lattice, materials are and why they behave purity. To achieve these, stainless within the grains. In stainless steels, the way they do. This is especially steels are often the economical and the crystalline structures within the true because the word “stainless” is practical materials of choice for pro- grains have been given names such as itself somewhat of a misnomer; these cess equipment. However, before ferrite, austenite, martensite, or a materials can stain and can corrode intelligent decisions can be made mixture of two or more of these.
  • An Analysis from the Perspective of Artistic Intent Versus Audience Experience and Interpretation

    An Analysis from the Perspective of Artistic Intent Versus Audience Experience and Interpretation

    . Volume 18, Issue 1 May 2021 The representation of audiences after 1960: An analysis from the perspective of artistic intent versus audience experience and interpretation Patrick Van Rossem, Utrecht University, The Netherlands Abstract: In The representation of the audiences after 1960, the question is asked whether we can consider the representation of the audience after 1960 in relation to artists’ ideas on the presence of an audience and its meaning giving activity. The focus is both on the representation of individual audience members or participants as well as on visitor groups. Since the 1960s the audience for art has grown and museums have seen their attendance rise. It has led amongst others to a more sophisticated mediation between artwork and audience. Since the 1960s one can also observe an increased awareness amongst artists of the fact that the experience of art and the attribution of meaning to art is differential in nature. But have artists accepted this reality? And can they ever come to terms with a critical art mediation that invites audiences to relate to art more subjectively? Analyses of both the representation of audiences and artists’ ideas on the presence of the audience shows that artists have been and are sometimes still struggling with these issues. In recent times however we can detect a growing acceptance of a more free and personal interpretation of art by the audience. Artists such as Michelangelo Pistoletto, Dan Graham, Bruce Nauman, Thomas Struth, Rineke Dijkstra, and Sophie Calle have represented audiences in ways that reveal their – positive, negative, worrying… - attitudes towards the presence of an interpreting, art consuming, desiring audience.
  • The Smart Mirror Technology

    The Smart Mirror Technology

    THE SMART MIRROR TECHNOLOGY A STYLISH MIRROR - WITH UNIQUE EXTRA FEATURES • A COMPLETE DIGITAL SIGNAGE SOLUTION • HIGH BRIGHTNESS SCREEN COMBINED WITH MEDIA PLAYER & FULL FUNCTIONAL CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM • DECORATIVE AND INFORMATIVE • PROVIDING INFORMATION THROUGH A NON-DISTURBING WAY ADMIRING OURSELVES IN MIRRORS COMES AS NATURALLY TO US AS BREATHING. WHETHER WE BASK IN OUR MAGNIFICENCE, LOOK FOR FLAWS OR SIMPLY TRY TO MAKE OURSELVES AS PERFECT AS POSSIBLE WE SPEND A MUCH TIME LOOKING AT OUR REFLECTIONS. SO WHY NOT COMBINE THIS MOST MUNDANE HUMAN INSTINCT WITH THE REALM OF INFINITE POSSIBILITIES? IN THE WORLD OF COMMERCIALS, ALMOST EVERYONE HAS A SELECTIVE BLINDNESS FOR ORDINARY MARKETING TOOLS. PROVIDE YOUR CUSTOMERS WITH DESIRED INFORMATION AND TARGETABLE MESSAGES ON A SURFACE THEY WOULD NEVER EXPECT TO GET IT. LEAVE A LASTING IMPRESSION WITH THE DENSION SMART MIRROR TECHNOLOGY. CONTENT & DEVICE MANAGEMENT THE MIRROR IS AVAILABLE IN FIVE DIFFERENT SIZES: MINI, SMALL, MEDIUM, LARGE, X-LARGE. CUSTOMERS MAY CHOOSE THE EXACT SIZE OF THE GLASS WITH A GIVEN SURFACE MAXIMUM. CUSTOMIZED MIRROR AND SCREEN COMBINATIONS ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN HIGHER VOLUMES, PLEASE GET IN TOUCH TO DISCUSS. [email protected] FRONT VIEW MINI SMALL MEDIUM LARGE X-LARGE Display size (inch) 10 32 42 46 55 Display resolution HD Full HD Full HD Full HD Full HD Max Mirror Surface 0,9 0,9 2 2 (sqm) UPPER SIDE VIEW Minimum Width 250 870 1 100 1 180 1 380 (mm) Minimum Height 150 570 690 740 850 (mm) Depth (mm) 30 45 45 45 45 45 ° ANGLE REAR VIEW Weight (kg) 2 18 25-30 35-38
  • ROBERT RYMAN Untitled 1963 Oil Paint on Stretched Sized Linen Canvas 27 1/2 × 27 3/8 Inches (69.9 × 69.5 Cm)

    ROBERT RYMAN Untitled 1963 Oil Paint on Stretched Sized Linen Canvas 27 1/2 × 27 3/8 Inches (69.9 × 69.5 Cm)

    FIRST FLOOR ROBERT RYMAN Untitled 1962 Oil and graphite on canvas 9 3/4 × 9 3/4 inches (24.8 × 24.8 cm) ROBERT RYMAN Untitled 1962 Oil on linen 12 1/2 × 12 3/4 inches (31.8 × 32.4 cm) ROBERT RYMAN Untitled #32 1963 Oil on linen 7 ⅝ × 7 3/4 inches (19.4 × 19.7 cm) ROBERT RYMAN Untitled 1963 Oil paint on stretched sized linen canvas 27 1/2 × 27 3/8 inches (69.9 × 69.5 cm) LEVY GORVY 909 MADISON AVENUE NEW YORK NY 10021 WWW.LEVYGORVY.COM +1 212 772 2004 Size: US Letter 8.5” x 11” Paper: 28# Crane’s Crest Fluorescent White Wove (Without Watermark) Engrave: Front 1/0 (PMS 423) +1.212.268.9201 Finish: Trim to final size FIRST FLOOR ROBERT RYMAN Untitled #1004 1960–61 Oil paint and gesso on unstretched sized linen canvas 15 1/2 × 14 1/2 inches (39.4 × 36.8 cm) ROBERT RYMAN Untitled 1958 Oil on canvas 43 × 43 inches (109.2 × 109.2 cm) San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, Purchase through a gift of Mimi and Peter Haas ROBERT RYMAN A painting of twelve strokes, measuring 11 1/4 × 11 1/4 signed at the bottom right corner 1961 Oil and gesso on linen canvas 14 × 14 × 1 1/2 inches (35.6 × 35.6 × 3.8 cm) San Francisco Museum of Modern Art Purchase through a gift of Mimi and Peter Haas ROBERT RYMAN Archive 1979 Oil on steel 13 1/2 × 11 7/8 × 1/2 inches (34.3 × 30.2 × 1.3 cm) San Francisco Museum of Modern Art Purchase through a gift of Mimi and Peter Haas LEVY GORVY 909 MADISON AVENUE NEW YORK NY 10021 WWW.LEVYGORVY.COM +1 212 772 2004 Size: US Letter 8.5” x 11” Paper: 28# Crane’s Crest Fluorescent White Wove (Without Watermark) Engrave: Front 1/0 (PMS 423) +1.212.268.9201 Finish: Trim to final size FIRST FLOOR ROBERT RYMAN Untitled Painting #13 1963 Oil on linen 22 × 22 inches (55.9 × 55.9 cm) ROBERT RYMAN Untitled 1962 Oil on linen 69 1/2 × 69 1/2 inches (176.5 × 176.5 cm) Whitney Museum of American Art, New York Gift of The American Contemporary Art Foundation, Inc., Leonard A.
  • The Reception of Palaeolithic Art at the Turn of the Twentieth Century: Between Archaeology and Art History

    The Reception of Palaeolithic Art at the Turn of the Twentieth Century: Between Archaeology and Art History

    The reception of Palaeolithic art at the turn of the twentieth century: between archaeology and art history Oscar Moro Abadía If I am asked to define any further what I mean by ‘the primitive’ I must refer the reader to the pages of this book, which will show that the term was associated in its time with early Greek vases, with quattrocento painting and with tribal art.1 These words by Ernst Gombrich summarize some of the main meanings associated with the term ‘primitive’ in the field of art history. In its original sense, the word refers to a movement of taste that, in the story of art, runs parallel to the progress towards naturalism. According to Gombrich, while art history may be described as the story of how ‘the artist got better and better in the imitation of nature’,2 there have been a number of artistic movements that have called for a deliberate abandonment of classical standards.3 This ‘preference for the primitive’ has been expressed in ‘the revulsion from that very perfection that art had been said to aim at’.4 During the last years of the nineteenth century, the theory of evolution ‘gave a new meaning to the term ‘primitive’ which […] came to denote the beginnings of human civilization’.5 As a result of this development, the term ‘primitive art’ was incorporated into art historians’ vocabulary to refer to a set of non-Western arts coming from Africa, America and Oceania.6 At the beginning of the twentieth century, ‘primitive art’ was used interchangeably with terms such as ‘savage art’, ‘tribal art’ and ‘art nègre’.7 Since then, the label has been intensively criticized for Acknowledgements.
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    Global histories a student journal The Construction of Chinese Art History as a Modern Discipline in the Early Twentieth Century Author: Jialu Wang DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/GHSJ.2019.294 Source: Global Histories, Vol. 5, No. 1 (May 2019), pp. 64-77 ISSN: 2366-780X Copyright © 2019 Jialu Wang License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Publisher information: ‘Global Histories: A Student Journal’ is an open-access bi-annual journal founded in 2015 by students of the M.A. program Global History at Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. ‘Global Histories’ is published by an editorial board of Global History students in association with the Freie Universität Berlin. Freie Universität Berlin Global Histories: A Student Journal Friedrich-Meinecke-Institut Koserstraße 20 14195 Berlin Contact information: For more information, please consult our website www.globalhistories.com or contact the editor at: [email protected]. The Construction of Chinese Art History as a Modern Discipline in the Early Twentieth Century by: WANG JIALU Wang Jialu Construction of Chinese Art | 65 | VI - 1 - 2019 Nottingham Ningbo China. ABOUT THE AUTHOR degree in Transcultural Studies at the Studies degree in Transcultural with a particular focus on China and its are Visual, Media and Material Cultures, global art history, and curating practices. global art history, She also holds an MA degree in Identity, She also holds an MA degree in Identity, London and a BA degree in International London contemporary media and cultural studies, Jialu Wang is currently pursuing a Master’s is currently pursuing a Master’s Jialu Wang Culture and Power from University College Culture and Power Communications Studies from University of Communications Studies University of Heidelberg.
  • A Review on Historical Earth Pigments Used in India's Wall Paintings

    A Review on Historical Earth Pigments Used in India's Wall Paintings

    heritage Review A Review on Historical Earth Pigments Used in India’s Wall Paintings Anjali Sharma 1 and Manager Rajdeo Singh 2,* 1 Department of Conservation, National Museum Institute, Janpath, New Delhi 110011, India; [email protected] 2 National Research Laboratory for the Conservation of Cultural Property, Aliganj, Lucknow 226024, India * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Iron-containing earth minerals of various hues were the earliest pigments of the prehistoric artists who dwelled in caves. Being a prominent part of human expression through art, nature- derived pigments have been used in continuum through ages until now. Studies reveal that the primitive artist stored or used his pigments as color cakes made out of skin or reeds. Although records to help understand the technical details of Indian painting in the early periodare scanty, there is a certain amount of material from which some idea may be gained regarding the methods used by the artists to obtain their results. Considering Indian wall paintings, the most widely used earth pigments include red, yellow, and green ochres, making it fairly easy for the modern era scientific conservators and researchers to study them. The present knowledge on material sources given in the literature is limited and deficient as of now, hence the present work attempts to elucidate the range of earth pigments encountered in Indian wall paintings and the scientific studies and characterization by analytical techniques that form the knowledge background on the topic. Studies leadingto well-founded knowledge on pigments can contribute towards the safeguarding of Indian cultural heritage as well as spread awareness among conservators, restorers, and scholars.
  • ENGLISH - the Blueproject Foundation Wants to Thank Their Kindness to the Artist Michelangelo Pistoletto and His Wife Maria Pioppi and the Staff of Galleria Continua

    ENGLISH - the Blueproject Foundation Wants to Thank Their Kindness to the Artist Michelangelo Pistoletto and His Wife Maria Pioppi and the Staff of Galleria Continua

    - ENGLISH - The Blueproject Foundation wants to thank their kindness to the artist Michelangelo Pistoletto and his wife Maria Pioppi and the staff of Galleria Continua. The Blueproject Foundation hosts the solo exhibition neighbourhood of La Ribera and El Born. of Michelangelo Pistoletto, which can be seen in Il Salotto from November 13th 2015 to March 27th 2016. On the other hand, the Blueproject Foundation is proud to offer an exclusive and unique conference, with free admission, by the famous The exhibition features a selection of works by the Italian artist held in the Auditorium of the Escola Massana on Friday famous Italian artist that comprise a career of almost November 13th. As a central element of the activities related to his solo forty years, from the mid-seventies until today, in exhibition, this conference is the perfect opportunity to better discover which he reflects on the perception of the self and the the thought and career of one of the most important living contemporary society to which we belong through everyday objects artists in the recent decades and precursor of the movement Arte Povera. like mirrors, used as an element of identification and turning them into artworks by themselves. These The conference is a perfect way for young art students, and the interested pieces are not only part of the history of a great creator public, to delve into some of the central topics developed by the art of but also the testimony of a key period in the history of Pistoletto such as the self-portrait, infinity, mirrors or the perception of contemporary art.