Parents by Adoption : Differing Perspectives of Couples in the Formation and Launching Stages of the Adoptive Family Life Cycle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parents by Adoption : Differing Perspectives of Couples in the Formation and Launching Stages of the Adoptive Family Life Cycle University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1996 Parents by adoption : differing perspectives of couples in the formation and launching stages of the adoptive family life cycle. Suzanne J. McGowan University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation McGowan, Suzanne J., "Parents by adoption : differing perspectives of couples in the formation and launching stages of the adoptive family life cycle." (1996). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 5246. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/5246 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PARENTS BY ADOPTION: DIFFERING PERSPECTIVES OF COUPLES IN THE FORMATION AND LAUNCHING STAGES OF THE ADOPTIVE FAMILY LIFE CYCLE A Dissertation Presented by SUZANNE J. MCGOWAN Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION School of Education © Copyright by Suzanne J. McGowan 1996 All Rights Reserved PARENTS BY ADOPTION: DIFFERING PERSPECTIVES OF COUPLES IN THE FORMATION AND LAUNCHING STAGES OF THE ADOPTIVE FAMILY LIFE CYCLE A Dissertation Presented by SUZANNE J. MCGOWAN Approved as to style and content by: Janine Roberts, Chair Allan Feldman, Member y W. Jackson, Dean ol of Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my thanks to the twelve couples who so willingly shared their stories about forming and being adoptive families. I learned from them, especially, of the trust we receive when we become parents by adoption. My thanks also go to Ann Henry who taught me to understand and appreciate my membership in the adoption triad. And, finally, I am deeply grateful to the birth parents of my two children. They gave me the opportunity to be a mother. During the process of writing this dissertation, many people were helpful. My husband Jon unstintingly gave of his time and energy to provide technical support services. Julie Shaw and Jody Soucie transcribed all the interview data. Janine Roberts focused my work and supported my thinking while also providing ongoing encouragement. I am grateful to all of them for their kindness and caring and also to David Johnson and Garrett McAulife, my first mentors. IV ABSTRACT PARENTS BY ADOPTION: DIFFERING PERSPECTIVES OF COUPLES IN THE FORMATION AND LAUNCHING STAGES OF THE ADOPTIVE FAMILY LIFE CYCLE SEPTEMBER 1996 SUZANNE J. MCGOWAN, A. B., CHATHAM COLLEGE M. A., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Ed. D., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor Janine Roberts Sealed adoption records support the notion that adoptive families are the same as biological families and that adoptive parenting should mirror biological parenting. Whether adoptive parents subscribe to these beliefs is not really known, since they have had few opportunities to tell about this way of being a family. The research involved a narrative analysis of the stories told conjointly by six couples in the formation stage and six couples in the launching stage of the adoptive family life cycle; this reflexive research demonstrates the collaborative nature of social constructionism. The research subject (the storyteller) and the research interviewer (the listener) create meaning together through the questions and responses, the interviewer's interpretation of the narrative and then the checkback which allows the storyteller to indicate disagreement or enlarged understanding. Adoptive couples with young children were found to believe that their family is not very different from biological families while the couples with children leaving home were assessing their parenting and the strength of their family ties. Overall, the couples seem to be constrained by their cultural understanding of parenthood. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. iv ABSTRACT. v Chapter 1. ISSUES IN ADOPTION. 1 Introduction . 1 Context. 1 Statement of the Problem and Rationale. 3 Research Questions . 4 Research Methodology. 4 Significance and Limitations. 6 Definition of Terms. 7 Organization of Subsequent Chapters. 9 2. PERSPECTIVES ON THE ADOPTIVE FAMILY. 10 Traditional Closed Adoption. 10 Open Adoption. 13 The Family Life Cycle. 15 Research Perspectives on the Adoptive Family. 19 Communication about Adoption. 20 Acknowledging Adoption. 23 Stage 3: The Newly Formed Adoptive Family. 25 Disclosure of Adoption. 26 Developmental Perspective on Adoption Disclosure. 28 Tasks for Adoptive Families in the Formation Stage. 32 Stage 5: Launching Adoptees and Moving On. 33 Search. 35 Summary. 41 vi 3. A REFLEXIVE METHODOLOGY 43 Narrative and Social Constructionism. 43 The Vocabulary of Self Narrative. 45 Evaluation of Narratives. 47 The Interpretation of Interview Narratives. 51 The Interview. 51 Transcriptions and Profile Narratives. 53 4. PARENTS BY ADOPTION. 58 Research Decisions. 58 Adoptive Couples in the Formative Stage of Family Development. 63 A Positive Way to Form a Family: Charlie and Marie, Adoptees Michael and Tina, ages 6 and 22 months. 64 Raising Adopted Children is Different from Raising Biological Children: Frank and Stephanie, Adoptees Lee and Kim, ages 8 and 4. 66 Optimism: Fred and Stella, Adoptee Olga, age 5. 67 A Real Family: Bill and Rose, Adoptee Liam, age 6. 69 The Difficulties of the Adoption Process: Michael and Elaine, Adoptee James, age 4. 71 A Simple Twist of Fate: Ken and Margaret, Adoptee Anne, age 4. 73 Deciding to Become Parents by Adoption. 74 Telling About Adoption: A Developmental Task. 78 Adoption Doesn't Make Any Difference. 82 Adoptive Parents in the Launching Stage of Family Development. 86 A Needy Child Dominates Parenting: Marie and Atherton, Adoptees Ivan and Roann, ages 25 and 21. 87 A Happy Family: Josephine and Fred, Adoptee Nancy Ann, age 23. 89 We Are the Family We've Become: Gail and George, Adoptee Ayeesha, age 24 and six other adoptees ages 6 to 14. 91 Accepting Our Children's Health Issues: Jo and Jean Pierre, Adoptees Ana and Eduardo, ages 20 and 12. 93 She Still Needs Us: Millie and Stan, Adoptee Victoria, age 17. 95 The Ups and Downs of Adoption: Tami and Bill, Adoptee Susan, age 17. 97 How They Became Parents by Adoption. 99 vii Developmental Tasks in the Launching Stage of Family Development... 102 Launching and Search: Developmental Tasks.106 Adoption Does Make a Difference.110 Summary: Acknowledging Two Families in Adoption.114 5. REFLECTIONS ON REFLEXIVE RESEARCH.117 Telling My Own Story.117 Answering the Research Questions.119 Conjoint Interviews and Stability Narratives...123 Future Research with Adoptive Parents.125 Evaluating the Narratives of Adoptive Parents. 128 Epilogue.131 APPENDICES A. THE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS.132 B. FIRST LETTER TO PARTICIPANTS.134 C. PERSONAL DATA FORM.135 D. VOLUNTARY CONSENT FORM.136 E. INTERVIEW WITH CHARLIE AND MARIE.137 F. PROFILE NARRATIVE FOR CHARLIE AND MARIE.188 G. CHECKBACK LETTER.202 H. REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK.203 BIBLIOGRAPHY.204 viu CHAPTER 1 ISSUES IN ADOPTION Introduction Talk, generally, has been considered to be a clinical tool, the means by which counselor/client interactions are conducted. The study of interview transcriptions, however, has brought talk out of the consulting room and into the arena of research. Qualitative research takes people's talk to be data. Over the past several years, my interests in adoptive families and in the methods of qualitative research have been developing while my own adoptive family has also grown and changed. I have used participant observation to complete a study focused on a support group for birth parents and adult adoptees involved in searches. Following that, in-depth interviews which detailed the meaning of search and reunion to a birth mother, an adoptive mother and "their daughter" were the foundation of my comprehensive examination. As a result of this work, I have become aware of the demands for adoption reform. For example, the practice of open adoption permits mutually agreed upon levels of contact between a child's adoptive family and the birth family. Unsealing the birth records would give adult adoptees legal access to personal information about themselves that is now denied them. CQntgxt All adoptees have two families: a birth family and an adoptive family. Adoption practice in the United States, however, is based on sealing court records, which makes a secret of the adoptee's family of origin and the circumstances of her/his relinquishment. Sealed adoption records are often defended on the basis of protecting 1 the privacy of both the birth mother and the adoptive family. Paradoxically, this practice renders adult adoptees powerless because adult treatment is not accorded them in this extraordinarily personal issue. In the meantime, trends in adoption make secrecy superfluous. There has been dramatic change in adoption since the 1970's. With the advent of widely available contraception and the legality of abortion, fewer Caucasian infants have been available for placement. This change has led to increasing numbers of international adoptions, special needs adoptions and of open adoptions as well. Children from the countries providing the largest numbers of international adoptees — South Korea, the Philippines,
Recommended publications
  • EXPERIMENT: a Manifesto of Young England, 1928- 1931 Two Volumes
    EXPERIMENT: A Manifesto of Young England, 1928- 1931 Two Volumes Vol. 2 of 2 Kirstin L. Donaldson PhD University of York History of Art September 2014 Table of Conents Volume Two Appendix: Full Transcript of Experiment Experiment 1 (November 1928) 261 Experiment 2 (February 1929) 310 Experiment 3 (May 1929) 358 Experiment 4 (November 1929) 406 Experiment 5 (February 1930) 453 Experiment 6 (October 1930) 501 Experiment 7 (Spring 1931) 551 260 EXPERIMENT We are concerned with all the intellectual interests of undergraduates. We do not confine ourselves to the work of English students, nor are we at pains to be littered with the Illustrious Dead and Dying. Our claim has been one of uncompromising independence: therefore not a line in these pages has been written by any but degreeless students or young graduates. It has been our object to gather all and none but the not yet ripe fruits of art, science and philosophy in the university. We did not wish so much that our articles should be sober and guarded as that they should be stimulating and lively and take up a strong line. We were prepared in fact to give ourselves away. But we know that Cambridge is painfully well-balanced just now (a sign, perhaps of anxiety neurosis) and so we were prepared also to find, as the reader will find, rather too guarded and sensible a daring. Perhaps we will ripen into extravagance. Contributions for the second number should be send to W. Empson of Magdalene College. We five are acting on behalf of the contributors, who have entrusted us with this part of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Illusory Distinction Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1992 The Illusory Distinction between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result David A. Strauss Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation David A. Strauss, "The Illusory Distinction between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result," 34 William and Mary Law Review 171 (1992). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ILLUSORY DISTINCTION BETWEEN EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY AND EQUALITY OF RESULT DAVID A. STRAUSS* I. INTRODUCTION "Our society should guarantee equality of opportunity, but not equality of result." One hears that refrain or its equivalent with increasing frequency. Usually it is part of a general attack on gov- ernment measures that redistribute wealth, or specifically on af- firmative action, that is, race- and gender-conscious efforts to im- prove the status of minorities and women. The idea appears to be that the government's role is to ensure that everyone starts off from the same point, not that everyone ends up in the same condi- tion. If people have equal opportunities, what they make of those opportunities is their responsibility. If they end up worse off, the government should not intervene to help them.1 In this Article, I challenge the usefulness of the distinction be- tween equality of opportunity and equality of result.
    [Show full text]
  • Curtailing Inherited Wealth
    Michigan Law Review Volume 89 Issue 1 1990 Curtailing Inherited Wealth Mark L. Ascher University of Arizona College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Law and Society Commons, Legislation Commons, and the Taxation-Federal Estate and Gift Commons Recommended Citation Mark L. Ascher, Curtailing Inherited Wealth, 89 MICH. L. REV. 69 (1990). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol89/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CURTAILING INHERITED WEALTH Mark L. Ascher* INTRODUCTION • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • . • • • 70 I. INHERITANCE IN PRINCIPLE........................... 76 A. Inheritance as a Natural Right..................... 76 B. The Positivistic Conception of Inheritance . 77 C. Why the Positivistic Conception Prevailed . 78 D. Inheritance - Property or Garbage?................ 81 E. Constitutional Concerns . 84 II. INHERITANCE AS A MATIER OF POLICY •• • . •••••.. •••• 86 A. Society's Stake in Accumulated Wealth . 86 B. Arguments in Favor of Curtailing Inheritance . 87 1. Leveling the Playing Field . 87 2. Deficit Reduction in a Painless and Appropriate Fashion........................................ 91 3. Protecting Elective Representative Government . 93 4. Increasing Privatization in the Care of the Disabled and the Elderly . 96 5. Expanding Public Ownership of National and International Treasures . 98 6. _Increasing Lifetime Charitable Giving . 98 7. Neutralizing the Co"osive Effects of Wealth..... 99 C. Arguments Against Curtailing Inheritance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Youth's Instructor for 1957
    Maryane Myers pictures in miniature the misery that comes with disaster: After Seven Years—Rain JULY 23, 1957 Bible Lesson for August 3 it ° WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS Are You a Berean? THE YOUTH'S INSTRUCTOR is read by many who COVER We are indebted to the Dallas do not necessarily accept the teachings and practices of its Morning News for the picture of a boy on Seventh-day Adventist publishers. It is to such readers that our our cover. He is smiling through a not-so- question is addressed—Are you a Berean? happy situation for many people. For a Tenor There is nothing mysterious about either the query or the of Our Times article turn to Maryane Myers' center-spread report, "After Seven Years— name it employs. Reference is made to the Bereans in the Scrip- Rain." A single article can give only a keyhole ture lesson beginning on page 17. Of them it was written: "These view of the disaster that has followed what were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the Weekly Reader of January 7-11, 1957, the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures credited scientists as saying was the worst daily, whether those things were so" (Acts 17:11). drought "in 700 years." Why were the residents of Berea judged more noble than the citizens of Thessalonica? Was it an accident of birth? or 23 Tenor of our times articles are item 23 inheritance? or public office? or renown in sports? or victories on our topic-frequency chart.
    [Show full text]
  • Cigarettesaftersex Biog2017 Copy
    ! ! BIOGRAPHY 2017 ! ! On August 18th 2017, Ghostpoet aka Obaro Ejimiwe returns with his eagerly anticipated fourth album. As the title suggests, Dark Days & Canapés is a record that siphons the sense of unease hanging in the air throughout the time of its creation and uses it as a fuel source. It’s also a record that dramatically fore- grounds the continuing evolution of twice- Mercury nominated Obaro as one of our most perspicacious and original songwriters. In the wake of 2015’s universally acclaimed Shedding Skin – an album which found him moving away from the beats-driven arrangements of the first two records – Dark Days & Canapés completes the transition to a fuller band sound. Integral to that transition was Obaro’s choice of producer for the record. “On previous records, the production side of things has run along 50:50 lines,” he explains, “But this time around, I wanted to see what would happen if I relaxed that a little.” Early in the process, he hooked up with producer/writer/ guitarist Leo Abrahams, perhaps best known for his work with Brian Eno and Jon Hopkins (Small Craft On A Milk Sea) and Wild Beasts (Present Tense) as well as his own feted solo albums. The two clicked immediately. “I went to his studio in East London,” recalls Obaro, “And the thing that struck me about him was that he was impossible to faze. I was de- scribing the mood I was after in quite fanciful, surreal terms, and yet he knew exactly how to translate !that into music.” The results of those early sessions - which saw guitarist Joe Newman assisting, fleshing out guitar parts on the early demos -quickly established the momentum of what followed.
    [Show full text]
  • Mourning the Family Album
    Mourning the Family Album Tahneer Oksman a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, Volume 24, Number 2, Winter 2009, pp. 235-248 (Article) Published by The Autobiography Society DOI: 10.1353/abs.2010.0002 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/abs/summary/v024/24.2.oksman.html Access Provided by New York University at 08/17/12 1:24AM GMT Mourning the Family Album By Tahneer Oksman The oval portrait of a dog was me at an early age. Something shimmers, something is hushed up —John Ashbery, “This Room” ANY MEMOIRS begin with youth—not just as a convenient mode Mof organization, but because the early years represent a kind of clean slate of consciousness, a time before the full range of pos- sibilities for self-reflection can be realized. As literal relics of the past, photographs are especially interesting objects to use to think about the past idyllic image of a self, the image that is forever being held up against the present self. In Jo Spence’s photographic memoir Putting Myself in the Picture, for instance, there is a photograph of the face of a six-year-old smiling girl with light hair and short bangs. The note beneath the photo reads, “Six years: looking like an uncared for, but rather cheeky ‘orphan’. This is a ‘face’ I still see on me even now. Less often though” (86). However much Spence has moved away from this photograph both in time (as an adult) and in percep- tion (as a photographer who examines and destabilizes the idea of a fixed image/identity), she is still trapped within its frame.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    Appeal: 14-1167 Doc: 94-1 Filed: 04/04/2014 Pg: 1 of 38 RECORD NUMBERS: 14-1167 (L), 14-1169, 14-1173 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit TIMOTHY B. BOSTIC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and JOANNE HARRIS, JESSICA DUFF, CHRISTY BERGHOFF and VICTORIA KIDD, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Intervenors, v. GEORGE E. SCHAEFER, III, in his official capacity as the Clerk of the Court for Norfolk Circuit Court, and JANET M. RAINEY, in her official capacity as State Registrar of Vital Records, et al., Defendants-Appellants, and MICHELE B. McQUIGG, in her official capacity as Prince William County Clerk of Circuit Court, et al., Intervenor / Defendant-Appellant. _______________________________________ ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA AT NORFOLK BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE DR. PAUL McHUGH IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND REVERSAL GERARD V. BRADLEY, ESQ. KEVIN T. SNIDER, ESQ. NOTRE DAME LAW SCHOOL PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE 3156 Eck Hall 212 9th Street, Suite 208 Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 Oakland, California 94607 (574) 631-8385 Telephone (510) 834-7232 Telephone (574) 631-8078 Facsimile (510) 834-8784 Facsimile Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Dr. Paul McHugh COUNSEL PRESS · (800) 3-APPEAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Appeal: 14-1167 Doc: 94-1 Filed: 04/04/2014 Pg: 2 of 38 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ......................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................................................................. 1 ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................. 3 I. Sexual Orientation Does Not Define a Discrete and Insular Minority.
    [Show full text]
  • "By Accident of Birth": the Battle Over Birthright Citizenship After United
    “By Accident of Birth”: The Battle over Birthright Citizenship After United States v. Wong Kim Ark Amanda Frost In theory, birthright citizenship has been well established in U.S. law since 1898, when the Supreme Court held in United States v. Wong Kim Ark that all born on U.S. soil are U.S. citizens. The experience of immigrants and their families over the last 120 years tells a different story, however. This article draws on government records documenting the Wong family’s struggle for legal recognition to illuminate the convoluted history of birthright citizenship. Newly discovered archival materials reveal that Wong Kim Ark and his family experienced firsthand, and at times shaped, the fluctuating relationship between immigration, citizenship, and access to civil and political rights. The U.S. government reacted to its loss in Wong’s case at first by refusing to accept the rule of birthright citizenship, and then by creating onerous proof-of-citizenship requirements that obstructed recognition of birthright citizenship for certain ethnic groups. But the Wong family’s story is not only about the use and abuse of government power. Government records reveal that the Wongs, like others in their position, learned how to use the immigration bureaucracy to their own advantage, enabling them to establish a foothold in the United States despite the government’s efforts to bar them from doing so. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................39 I. AN IMMIGRANT FAMILY’S BACKSTORY ............................................43 Ann Loeb Bronfman Distinguished Professor of Law and Government, American University. I am grateful for the American Council of Learned Societies, which awarded me a fellowship to support the research and writing of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Pictures Worth More Than 1000 Words
    PAGE 12 • THE VILLAGER • February 25, 2010 Before their lives were destroyed at Auschwitz, Jews lived normal lives, like Binim Cukierman, (on the sled), who hiked and skied regularly. Photos courtesy Ann Weiss, from The Last Album ‘The Last Album’ Book, lecture recollect lives before they were destroyed in the Holocaust By Joshua Cole these people were like before going ity, but, more importantly, she Siblings Renia and David Kohn, in the summer of 1939, weeks hat do you think off to the camps. You’ll see wed- preserves the contingency of daily before Germany attacked Poland. Ann Weiss’s “Last Album” is a about when you dings, first days of school, vaca- lives as lived and perceived then – way to memorialize lives like theirs and memories that would have read about the Ho- tions on the beach, play days in the and not only as they are retrospec- otherwise been forgotten. Weiss plans to tell some of the stories of locaust? Do you snow. tively freighted with the pathos and the photos she found at Auschwitz, March 14. Wthink about Hitler and Swasti- You’ll see people. Real people. portent we assign them now.” kas? About ghettos, concentration Weiss will share stories behind ated skeletons, we can distance by their deaths into their intimacies. camps, gas chambers and mass some of the pictures, March 14, for Pictures worth more from them. It’s a tragedy, but it’s a We remember what they wished to graves? About people hiding in the annual Fred Marcus Memorial tragedy that doesn’t have anything remember; and in the memory of silence in attics and crawl spaces? Lecture, in Glendale.
    [Show full text]
  • Late 1960'S - Early 1970'S
    Late 1960's - Early 1970's The birth of heavy metal. Groups like Black Sabbath, Led Zeppelin and Deep Purple were the first heavy metal bands. Late 1970's The rise of the New Wave of British Heavy Metal. Bands like Iron Maiden and Judas Priest become very popular. 1978 Van Halen released their debut album. This began the Los Angeles/Sunset Strip scene, and many bands would come out of this era, including Motley Crue and Quiet Riot. The so called "hair bands" like Poison, Warrant and Ratt came from that scene as well. The Who's Keith Moon died. Bands formed this year: Dokken, Ratt, Whitesnake A sample of heavy metal albums released in 1978: Black Sabbath - Never Say Die Judas Priest - Stained Class UFO - Obsession 1979 The German band Accept releases their self-titled debut album. They are considered to be the first European power metal band. Ozzy Osbourne was fired from Black Sabbath and replaced by Ronnie James Dio. Bands formed this year: Europe, Hanoi Rocks, Trouble and Venom. A sample of heavy metal albums released in 1979: AC/DC - Highway To Hell Judas Priest - Hell Bent For Leather Led Zeppelin - In Through The Out Door Kiss - Dynasty Saxon - Saxon Scorpions - Lovedrive 1980 Best Heavy Metal Album Of 1980: AC/DC - Back In Black AC/DC lead singer Bon Scott dies and is replaced by Brian Johnson. Also Led Zeppelin drummer John Bonham dies. Bands formed this year: Manowar, Mercyful Fate, Overkill A sample of heavy metal albums released in 1980: Angel Witch - Angel Witch Black Sabbath - Heaven And Hell Def Leppard - On Through The Night Diamond Head - Lightning To The Nations Iron Maiden - Iron Maiden Judas Priest - British Steel Motorhead - Ace Of Spades Ozzy Osbourne - Blizzard Of Ozz Saxon - Wheels Of Steel 1981 Best Heavy Metal Album Of 1981: Motley Crue - Too Fast For Love Venom's first album was released, beginning the genre of black metal.
    [Show full text]
  • Eonmusic.Co.Uk ! "
    Home News Interviews Albums Live Features The Cranberries Back On Home Turf For First Belfast Show In 14 Years. 17/5/2017 0 Comments The Cranberries made a triumphant return to Belfast on Wednesday night (17th May), for their first gig in the city in fourteen years. Playing to a sold out Waterfront Hall, the Limerick band led by singer Dolores O'Riordan said that they were glad to be "back on home turf". Snakemaiden: Neil Murray Reveals Work With Iron Maiden’s Adrian Smith. John 'Rhino' Edwards On Revenge, Parfitt & Quo. Neil Murray Chats Snakes, Sabbth, Queens & Maidens. Hank Marvin On 'Without A Word' & His Astonishing Career. Photo: Darren McVeigh. By Colleen Crawford On 18th May 2017. Black Star Riders Announce New Drummer. The Cranberries made a triumphant return to Belfast on Wednesday night (17th May), for their first gig in the city in fourteen years. Playing to a sold out Waterfront Hall, the Limerick band led by singer Dolores O'Riordan said that they were glad to be "back on home turf". Trenchtown Turns Ten As With a show that featured all the hits from their celebrated back catalogue in the stripped back, string quartet- Electric Picnic Line-Up Grows. augmented style of latest album 'Something Else', the band also treated fans to a brace of new tracks from their 2017 release. Arriving onstage to the energetic 'Analyse', the Limerick-based band were greeted to a standing ovation, as Dolores O’Riordan cried; “Hello Belfast”. Reminiscing about their recent European tour, the vocalist said; “We’ve just flown in Jamming With Adrian Smith, from Paris", before delighting the Belfast crowd by adding; "It’s great to be back on our home turf.” Meeting Bruce Dickinson & An Accident Of Birth.
    [Show full text]
  • Passport Power – Citizenship by Investment Programmes Exploiting Spatiotemporal Hierarchies of Passports
    Linköping university - Department of Social and Welfare Studies (ISV) Master´s Thesis, 30 Credits – MA in Ethnic and Migration Studies (EMS) ISRN: LiU-ISV/EMS-A--19/04--SE Passport Power – Citizenship by Investment Programmes Exploiting Spatiotemporal Hierarchies of Passports Irvina Udyakisya Freisleben Supervisor: Peo Hansen ABSTRACT The practice of selling passports through Citizenship by Investment (CBI) programmes is gaining more attraction and legitimacy in light of increasingly stricter immigration policies. Instead of simply weighing the pro and contra points of CBI, this thesis aims to understand CBI as a consequence of neoliberalism and analyses the correlation between so called ‘passport power’ and wealth, whereby the former is determined by rankings and the latter is represented in terms of the gross domestic product (GDP). Hence, a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods is used to firstly, examine the strength of correlation, and secondly, supported by Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory, discuss how CBI is understood and debated in the context of today’s governed communities. The CBI arises out of a discursive struggle between citizenship and class, and exacerbates preexisting global inequalities. Furthermore, it challenges the normative foundations of citizenship and its connection to the nation state. On the one hand CBI contests the sedimented discourse of the modern passport system (and by extension the notions of citizenship), on the other hand capitalist negative individualism corrupts/distorts the initially
    [Show full text]