The South Jersey Port Corporation 1994: the 25Th Anniversary of the SJPC Is Created by the New Jersey Legislature

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The South Jersey Port Corporation 1994: the 25Th Anniversary of the SJPC Is Created by the New Jersey Legislature USS New Jersey at the Broadway Terminal Table of Contents Chairman’s Letter . 1 Beckett Street Terminal . 11 Board of Directors . 2-3 Broadway Terminal . 11 Balzano History . 4-5 Salem Terminal . 12 Year In Re v iew . 6-7 Port Leadership, Port Staff, Economic Impact & Port Statistics . 8-9 Mission Statement . .Inside Back Cover 1 SJPC Board of Directors Richard A. Alaimo, Chairman Barbara Tomalino Mr. Alaimo is founder and President of Ms. Tomalino is President and owner of the Alaimo Group, Consulting Engineers, Paramount Air Service, the nation’s old- located in Mount Holly and Paterson, est and largest aerial advertising firm, New Jersey, and is a Consulting Civil headquartered in Cape May and Sanitary Engineer. He is a Licensed Courthouse, New Jersey. Ms. Tomalino Professional Engineer in NJ, PA and DE, is a Commissioner of the New Jersey a Certified Public Works Manager, a Commerce and Economic Growth member and past President of the Commission and she is Chair of the Rancocas Valley Regional High School Cape Women’s Resource Fund as well as Board of Education, a Diplomate in the the Cape Education Fund. Ms. American Academy of Environmental Tomalino is also a board member of the Engineers, a member of the National South Jersey Economic Development Society of Professional Engineers, the District and also serves on the Burdette New Jersey Society of Municipal Engineers, Tomlin Memorial Hospital Board. She the Rutgers University Engineering is past President of the Cape May Society, and the 1994 recipient of the County Chamber of Commerce and “Distinguished Engineer of the Year served as President of the New Jersey Award” from the American Society of Association of Women Business Owners Civil Engineers. He has been a member and as a Board member of the New of the Port Corporation since 1968, Jersey Travel & Resort Association. She representing Burlington County. was appointed to the Port Corporation in December 1995, representing Cape May County. South Jersey serve on our Board of Port Corporation Directors. We wish to extend our thanks and appreciation for he South Jersey Port the considerable time spent in TCorporation is most fortu- overseeing the growing amount nate in attracting the caliber of of activity at the Port. business professionals who 2 Craig F. Remington Wilbert Mitchell Col (Ret) Michael L. Warner Mr. Remington serves as Principal, Vice Mr. Mitchell is Executive Director of Colonel (Ret) Michael L. Warner is President and Treasurer of Remington Respond Inc. of Camden County, New Chief of Staff for the Eight Legislative & Vernick Engineers, located in Jersey. He graduated from Cheyney District of New Jersey. Prior to assum- Haddonfield, serving clients throughout University with a degree in elementary ing this position, Colonel Warner was New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware. and special education. He has done the Deputy Commissioner for Veterans He is the grandson of the firm’s graduate study at Temple University, Affairs for the State of New Jersey. He founder, J.C. Remington – three genera- New York University and Glassboro served over 27 years on Active Duty as tions of continuity has provided a State College. He is President of the an officer in the United States Army. unique stability to the firm for over 100 North Camden Neighborhood Colonel Warner graduated from Arizona years. Mr. Remington is a licensed Development Corporation, past State University and his Master’s Degree Professional Land Surveyor and Chairman of the Camden Waterfront in Business Administration. Professional Planner, and graduate of Management Corporation, and a mem- He belongs to several professional Drake University and Temple ber of the Governor’s Task force on organizations. Among those groups are: University. Mr. Remington is a member Child Abuse and various civic and pro- The Army War College; The Association of the New Jersey Society of fessional organizations in the City of of the U.S. Army; and the Retired Professional Land Surveyors, New Jersey Camden and Camden County. He has Officers Association. Service organiza- Federation of Planners, Our Lady of been a member of the Port tions include: Veterans of Foreign Wars; Lourdes Hospital Foundation Board, Corporation since 1991, representing American Legion; and lifetime member- the Rotary Club of Haddonfield, the Camden County ship in the Vietnam Veterans of Boys & Girls Club of America, and is America; Military Order of the Purple past president of the Gloucester/Salem Heart; and the Disabled American Engineering Society. He has been a Veterans.Veterans. He is also a member member of the Port Corporation since of the Burlington County Boy Scouts of 2001, representing Camden County. America Executive Council; the Board of Trustees for the Greater Delaware Valley Chapter of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society and Burlington County College. 3 Joseph A. Balzano Executive Director & CEO Executive Director’s ing our trade partners, tenants, cus- tonnage year in its 72-year history and Message tomers, as well as our host city and continued to expand as a home to the Delaware Valley Region at large to many marine-related businesses. The 2001 was a challenging year and one the best of our ability. Port Corporation’s growing commu- that will bring significant change in The Port of Camden again proved to nity of tenants include Del Monte the way we all do business and live Fresh Fruit, St. Lawrence Cement, our lives. Adapting to the changing be a winning solution for the shippers worldwide looking for a leader in Camden International Commodities needs of our global marketplace and Terminal, Tri-State Bulk Handling, society is not a new idea, but is one marine terminal services, warehousing and Camden Yards Steel to name a that is ever more present. The Port and logistics throughout 2001. The few, demonstrate the effectiveness of 4 Corporation remains focused on serv- Port experienced its second largest Joseph A. Balzano An Historical Relationship with South Jersey Port Corporation 1926: Creation of the South Jersey Port Terminal. District by the New Jersey State Legislature 1986: Mainland China calls on the Port and touches off an explosion of growth of Camden for the first time in 40 years, that establishes the City of Camden as a with a ship laden with hardboard. world-class port. 1988: Joseph A. Balzano is promoted to 1928: The South Jersey Port Commission the position of Executive Director and begins operations at the “Camden Chief Executive Officer. Marine Terminals.” 1989: Del Monte Fresh Fruit opens at 1931: The Beckett Street Terminal opens. the Broadway Terminal, making Camden 1951: Joseph A. Balzano begins his their largest distribution center in the maritime career with the South Jersey Northeast and Mid-Atlantic U.S. regions. Port Commission. 1991: SJPC handles a record-breaking 1965: The Port of Camden handles a 1,000,000 tons of export scrap metal. record breaking 424,173 tons, including 1992: A $6 million dredging project 152,742,777 board feet of lumber. jointly funded by the U.S. Army Corp of 1965: Two 25-ton capacity whirly gantry Engineers and the Delaware River Port cranes are purchased and steel coils arrive. Authority, deepens the access channel to 1966: Ground is broken for a new 500 40 feet from the river-channel to SJPC’s foot wharf at Beckett St. Beckett Street terminal. 1968: The South Jersey Port Corporation 1994: The 25th anniversary of the SJPC is created by the New Jersey Legislature. culminates in the construction of a new berth at Beckett Street and an agreement 1969: Joseph A. Balzano is promoted to to operate the Port of Salem. Deputy Executive Director of Operations & Facilities. 1997: Del Monte expands their operation at the Broadway Terminal commencing 1971: The New York Shipyard site is a five million dollar warehouse expan- opened as the Broadway Terminal. sion project. 1972: SJPC participates in its first New 1999: St. Lawrence Cement Company Jersey World Trade Conference and executes a 45-year lease with the SJPC to begins handling humanitarian cargo for build a $50 million slag processing facility the CARE program. at the Broadway Terminal. 1979: The Port of Camden becomes the 2000: Joseph A. Balzano begins his 2nd largest lumber port on the East Coast. 50th year of service with the Port of 1983: SJPC ranks among the top 10 Camden. percent of all ports worldwide, and 2001: Supervised the construction of a continues to grow, completing a $14.5 berth for the Battleship New Jersey. million expansion at the Beckett Street the Port Corporation’s public/private network and expand our vital eco- toward fulfilling our goals and partnerships vision. Through this nomic impacts. During 2001, we responding to the needs of our cus- expanding network, the Port experienced notable growth in creat- tomers and port users. As I enter my Corporation brings added value to the ing employment opportunities and 51st year working in the Port of commodities that pass through our expanding business revenue. The Camden, I remain enthusiastic about terminals and the services we provide. Port Corporation stands as one of the the opportunities for growth and suc- largest employers in the City of cess that lie ahead for the Port As an agency of the State of New Camden. Corporation. Jersey, the Port Corporation proudly continues to fulfill its mission to I am proud to have a skilled and expe- enhance our state’s transportation rienced team who work diligently 5 Year In Review The year 2001 proved to be a significant year in the history of the South Jersey Port Corporation. Enhancing and improving the facilities and capabilities of the Port Corporation is paramount to continue to fulfill the Port’s primary mission and goals. 6 St. Lawrence Cement Plant The Successes ❚ A new business located at the Broadway around 15 acres of storage area at the Beckett of 2001 Include: Terminal, Camden Yards Steel opened their facili- Street Terminal.
Recommended publications
  • Economic Development Strategic Plan Salem County, New Jersey 2014-2017
    Economic Development Strategic Plan 2014 - 2017 Economic Development Strategic Plan Salem County, New Jersey 2014-2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. Executive Summary ………………………………………………… 2 II. Introduction...…………………………………………………...……. 3 III. Location and History of Salem County …………………………… 4 IV. County Demographics and Statistics …………………………..... 5 V. County Infrastructure ………………………………………………. 6 VI. Available Land and Buildings ………………………………..……. 7 VII. Redevelopment Opportunities …………………………………….. 7 VIII. S.W.O.T. Analysis ………………………………………………….. 7 IX. Priority Projects ……………………………………………………... 15 X. Implementation Plan ……………………………………………….. 21 XI. Plan Updating Process …………………………………………….. 24 XII. Appendix …………………………………………………………….. 24 Economic Development Strategic Plan Salem County, New Jersey 2014 – 2017 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Salem County Improvement Authority (SCIA), In conjunction with the County of Salem (the County), has developed this new Economic Development Strategic Plan to serve as a guide or “playbook” in the undertaking of a focused and coordinated program of economic development throughout the County of Salem, New Jersey. This new economic development strategic plan builds upon previous economic development strategic plans and in particular the current plan developed by the SCIA in 2010. In the past four years since the last plan was prepared and adopted by the County and the SCIA, social and economic forces have again shifted, mostly in a positive direction, since the previous plan was developed when the nation and the County were suffering from the economic downturn generally referred to as “The Great Recession”. This new strategic economic development plan focuses on guiding the County’s economic development program to take advantage of an expected rebounding international, national, State and local economy. Salem County has distinct competitive advantages for the certain business and industries based upon its location, affordable land costs, infrastructure and labor force.
    [Show full text]
  • South Jersey Port Corporation $75,740,000
    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2012 of an NEW ISSUE – Book-Entry Only Ratings: See “RATINGS” herein. SOUTH JERSEY PORT CORPORATION $75,740,000* MARINE TERMINAL REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS Consisting of $58,990,000* MARINE TERMINAL REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2012 Q and $16,750,000* MARINE TERMINAL REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2012 R (AMT) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: January 1, as shown on the inside front cover The $58,990,000* Marine Terminal Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 Q (the “Series 2012 Q Bonds”) and $16,750,000* Marine Terminal Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 R (AMT) (the “Series 2012 R Bonds” and, together with the Series 2012 Q Bonds, the “Series 2012 Bonds”), will be issued as fully registered bonds without coupons and, when issued, will be registered in the name of and held by Cede & Co., as nominee for the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), New York, New York. DTC will act as securities depository for the Series 2012 Bonds. Purchases of beneficial interests in the Series 2012 Bonds will be made in book-entry form in denominations of $5,000 or integral multiples thereof. Purchasers will not receive certificates representing their beneficial interests in the Series 2012 Bonds. For as long as DTC or its nominee, Cede & Co., is the registered owner of the Series 2012 Bonds, all payments of principal or sinking fund cial Statement constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation installments of and interest on the Series 2012 Bonds are payable by U.S. Bank National Association, Morristown, New Jersey, as registrar and paying agent (the “Registrar and Paying Agent”) to DTC.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS
    New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS Table of CONTENTS Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Federal Highway Administration. New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN Page left blank intentionally. Table of CONTENTS Acknowledgements The New Jersey Department of Transportation’s Division of Multimodal Services thanks the many organizations and individuals for their time and contribution in making this document possible. New Jersey Department of Transportation Nicole Minutoli Paul Truban Genevieve Clifton Himanshu Patel Andrew Ludasi New Jersey Freight Advisory Committee Calvin Edghill, FHWA Keith Skilton, FHWA Anne Strauss-Wieder, NJTPA Jakub Rowinski, NJTPA Ted Dahlburg, DVRPC Mike Ruane, DVRPC Bill Schiavi, SJTPO David Heller, SJTPO Steve Brown, PANYNJ Victoria Farr, PANYNJ Stephanie Molden, PANYNJ Alan Kearns, NJ TRANSIT Steve Mazur, SJTA Rodney Oglesby, CSX Rick Crawford, Norfolk Southern Michael Fesen, Norfolk Southern Jocelyn Hill, Conrail Adam Baginski, Conrail Kelvin MacKavanagh, New Jersey Short Line Railroad Association Brian Hare, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation David Rosenberg, New York State Department of Transportation Consultant Team Jennifer Grenier, WSP Stephen Chiaramonte, WSP Alan Meyers, WSP Carlos Bastida, WSP Joseph Bryan, WSP Sebastian Guerrero, WSP Debbie Hartman, WSP Ruchi Shrivastava, WSP Reed Sibley, WSP Scudder Smith, WSP Scott Parker, Jacobs Engineering Jayne Yost, Jacobs Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Salem Corridor Freight Rail Intermodal Study. South
    Port of Salem Corridor Freight Rail Intermodal Study Final Report South Jersey Transportation Planning Organization May 2018 ii Port of Salem Corridor Study Port of Salem Corridor Freight Rail Intermodal Study South Jersey Transportation Planning Organization Jennifer Marandino, PE, Executive Director William Schiavi, Project Manager Consultant Team AECOM Envision Consultants iii Port of Salem Corridor Study Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 II. PREVIOUS STUDIES .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 III. CURRENT CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 8 IV. OUTREACH ................................................................................................................................................................... 12 V. ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 13 APPENDICES A. Review of Previous Studies B. Summary of Field Work C. Summary of Outreach
    [Show full text]
  • State of New Jersey E NVIRONMENTAL J USTICE T ASK F ORCE
    State of New Jersey E NVIRONMENTAL J USTICE T ASK F ORCE Acknowledgements The Environmental Justice Task Force would like to acknowledge all of the community members who spoke with and wrote to the State Environmental Justice Task Force and NJDEP’s Environmental Justice Program to provide input in the development of this report and action plan, including the City of Camden, the Honorable Mayor Gwendolyn A. Faison, Mr. Charles Lyons, Ms. Lula Williams, Monsignor Michael Doyle and the Heart of Camden, Ms. Olga Pomar, Ms. Barbara Pfeiffer, Mr. Marc Cadwell, Ms. Phyllis Holmes, Dr. Shirley Peterson, Mr. Roy Jones, Ms. Linda Selby, Ms. Jane Nagocki, Camden Churches Organized for People (CCOP), the Environmental Justice Advisory Council and a host of others that are committed to improving the quality of life and the health of residents and workers in Camden’s Waterfront South neighborhood. Environmental Justice Task Force Agencies and other Governmental Agencies: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services New Jersey Department of Education New Jersey Department of Community Affairs New Jersey Department of Transportation New Jersey Division of Law and Public Safety New Jersey Economic Development Authority Economic Recovery Board Camden Redevelopment Authority City of Camden Camden County Health Department Environmental Justice Advisory Council Valorie Caffee, Chairperson Betty Kearns, First Vice Chairperson Ana Baptista Dawn Breeden Theodore Carrington Colandus “Kelly” Francis Avery Grant Michelle Garcia Kim Gaddy Juanita Joyner Donald McCloskey Frederic Martin The Environmental Justice Task Force would especially like to thank all agency staff who provided contributions to this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Industrial Heritage in Waterfront Redevelopment
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2010 From Dockyard to Esplanade: Leveraging Industrial Heritage in Waterfront Redevelopment Jayne O. Spector University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Spector, Jayne O., "From Dockyard to Esplanade: Leveraging Industrial Heritage in Waterfront Redevelopment" (2010). Theses (Historic Preservation). 150. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/150 Suggested Citation: Spector, Jayne O. (2010). "From Dockyard to Esplanade: Leveraging Industrial Heritage in Waterfront Redevelopment." (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/150 For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Dockyard to Esplanade: Leveraging Industrial Heritage in Waterfront Redevelopment Abstract The outcomes of preserving and incorporating industrial building fabric and related infrastructure, such as railways, docks and cranes, in redeveloped waterfront sites have yet to be fully understood by planners, preservationists, public administrators or developers. Case studies of Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Philadelphia/ Camden, Dublin, Glasgow, examine the industrial history, redevelopment planning and approach to preservation and adaptive reuse in each locale. The effects of contested industrial histories,
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Commerce in Greater Philadelphia
    MARITIME COMMERCE IN GREATER PHILADELPHIA Assessing Industry Trends and Growth Opportunities for Delaware River Ports July 2008 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Maritime Commerce In Greater Philadelphia Executive Summary 3 Introduction and Project Partners 8 Section 1: Economic Impact Analysis 9 Section 2: Delaware River Port Descriptions & Key Competitors 12 Section 3: Global Trends and Implications for Delaware River Ports 24 Section 4: Strategies and Scenarios for Future Growth 31 Section 5: Conclusions and Key Recommendations 38 Appendices Appendix A: Glossary 40 Appendix B: History of the Delaware River Ports 42 Appendix C: Methodology for Economic Impact Analysis 46 Appendix D: Port-Reliant Employment 48 Appendix E: Excerpts from Expert Panel Discussions 49 Appendix F: Port Profiles 55 Appendix G: Additional Data 57 Appendix H: Delaware River Port Maps 62 Appendix I: End Notes 75 Appendix J: Resources 76 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary For more than 300 years, the from origin to final destination. supports 12,121 jobs and $772 mil- Delaware River has served as a key ⇒ Implications for Delaware lion in labor income, generating $2.4 commercial highway for the region. River Ports. The region has ca- billion in economic output. While Greater Philadelphia’s mari- pacity to accommodate growth, The port industry’s regional job time roots remain, rapid globalization but its ports must collaborate to base is relatively small, but those jobs and technological advances are driv- develop a comprehensive plan generate higher than average income ing an industry-wide transformation that addresses existing con- and output per job. Regional direct that has impacted the role that Dela- straints and rationally allocates jobs represent an average annual in- ware River ports play in the larger cargo based on competitive ad- come (including fringe benefits) of economy.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Salem Harbor Plan Substitution Summary 122 Table 3: 2008 Salem Harbor Plan Amplification Summary 123
    SALEM HARBOR PLAN The City of Salem, Massachusetts Mayor Kimberley Driscoll January 2008 Fort Point Associates, Inc TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii 2008 UPDATE OVERVIEW iv I. SUMMARY Introduction 1 The Vision 1 II. INTRODUCTION Overview 4 The Harbor Planning Area 4 The Planning Process 6 A Guide to the Planning Recommendations 9 III. FRAMEWORK FOR PLANNING Summary of Existing Conditions 13 Goals and Objectives 20 IV. PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS Area-Wide Recommendations 24 South Commercial Waterfront 38 Tourist Historic Harbor 49 North Commercial Waterfront 56 Industrial Port 60 Community Waterfront 63 V. IMPLEMENTATION Oversight and Responsibilities 71 Economic Development 76 Phasing Strategy 78 Resources 80 Implementation - Summary of Proposed Actions 88 VI. REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT Overview: Chapter 91 100 Activities Subject to Chapter 91 102 Designated Port Area 103 Authority of the Salem Harbor Plan and DPA Master Plan 104 Guidance to DEP: Substitute Provisions 105 Guidance To DEP: Non-substitute Provisions 111 Other Local and Federal Regulations and Permits 117 Substitution and Amplification Tables 122 VII. FUTURE PLANNING 124 i APPENDICES A. PUBLIC INPUT - STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS B. RECENTLY OR SOON TO BE COMPETED REPORTS Salem Open Space and Recreation Plan (2007) Winter Island Barracks Building Feasibility Reuse Study (Jul 2007) Downtown Salem Retail Market Study: Strategy and Action Plan (May 2007) Salem Wharf Expansion Plan (expected early 2008) C. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT D. BATHYMETRIC
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of State Funding Practices for Coastal Port Infrastructure Final Report
    Survey of State Funding Practices for Coastal Port Infrastructure Final Report PRC 15-51-F Survey of State Funding Practices for Coastal Port Infrastructure Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 15-51-F May 2015 Author C. James Kruse Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 6 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 6 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction/Background........................................................................................................... 11 Nature of Capital Investment at Ports ....................................................................................... 11 Status of Texas Ports ................................................................................................................. 11 Purpose of Report ...................................................................................................................... 11 Report Content .......................................................................................................................... 12 Texas............................................................................................................................................. 13 Texas Port System ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Annual Report South Jersey Port Corporation
    2005 SOUTH JERSEY ANNUAL REPORT PORT CORPORATION 2005 ANNUAL REPORT SJPC CONTENTS Chairman’s Letter 1 Board of Directors 2 2005 Overview 4 Port Facilities 9 Port Management & Staff 13 Financial Statements 14 2005 ANNUAL REPORT SJPC TO THE GOVERNOR AND LEGISLATURE The South Jersey Port Corporation (SJPC), perhaps GOVERNOR JON S. CORZINE uniquely among agencies of the State of New Jersey, is both a public servant and a business. That’s why it is gratifying to report to you that, during 2005, the SJPC served the public of New Jersey and of the South Jersey region so well with effective business management and planning, as it once again achieved a combined record level of business at the Ports of Camden and Salem. Importantly, while the SJPC At the Port of Salem, the SJPC achieved record cargo tonnage levels welcomed a principal new tenant. for the third consecutive year and National Docks is a sand and gravel installed and implemented the use of business that brought 90,000 tons of important new infrastructure at the material through the port in just six Port of Camden, the port corporation months of operation during 2005. made important strides forward with Importantly, this new tenant brings long- planning for development of a fourth term stability to the state’s southernmost port in South Jersey at Paulsboro. port. In a development to sustain the Combined cargo totals at Camden viability of the port, the Salem River and Salem during 2005 topped 3.5 channel deepening from 12 feet to 16 million tons, a healthy 3.5 percent feet in a project was funded jointly from increase over 2004, with leading state and federal resources.
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast Marine Highway Report
    EAST COAST MARINE HIGHWAY INITIATIVE M-95 STUDY FINAL REPORT October 2013 PREPARED FOR: East Coast Marine Highway Initiative Awarding Authority New Bedford Harbor Development Commission Maryland Port Administration New Jersey Department of Transportation Canaveral Port Authority I-95 Corridor Coalition DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATIONS This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the East Coast Marine Highway Initiative Awarding Authority, a cooperative formed between the ports of New Bedford, Baltimore and Canaveral, the New Jersey Department of Transportation, and the I-95 Corridor Coalition. The cooperative agreement was funded by the U.S. Maritime Administration. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations in this report are those of the researchers and staff, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any government agencies or organizations that funded the study. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Certain forward-looking statements are based upon interpretations or assessments of best available information at the time of writing. Actual events may differ from those assumed, and events are subject to change. Findings are time-sensitive and relevant only to current conditions at the time of writing. Factors influencing the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements may exist that are outside of the purview of the consulting firm. Parsons Brinckerhoff’s report is thus to be viewed as an assessment that is time-relevant, specifically referring to conditions at the time of review. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party's use or the results of such use of any information contained in this document in whole or in part.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Submission of a Request to Proceed for the Amendment to The
    Public Notice Notice of Submission of a Request for a Notice to Proceed for the Amendment to the City of Salem Municipal Harbor Plan and Designated Port Area Master Plan pursuant to 301 CMR 23.00 In accordance with the applicable regulations at 301 CMR 23.00, the City of Salem has submitted a Request for a Notice to Proceed (RNTP) to the Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs to initiate the state approval for an amendment to the 2008 Salem Municipal Harbor Plan and Designated Port Area Master Plan. Copies of the RNTP may be obtained by contacting Seth Lattrell at [email protected]. Written comments on the RNTP will be considered. Comments must be received by 4:30 p.m. on Friday, July 10, 2020. Comments should be addressed to: Office of Coastal Zone Management 251 Causeway Street, Suite 800 Boston, MA 02114-2136 Attn: Kathryn Glenn Note: Due to the COVID-19 outbreak, the preference is for electronic submission of comments. Comments can also be submitted electronically to [email protected] and copied to [email protected]. Notification Date: June 10, 2020 Salem Municipal Harbor Plan Update Request for Notice to Proceed Kimberley Driscoll Mayor Tom Daniel, Aicp Director City Of Salem, Massachusetts Department Of Planning And Community Development 98 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Tele: 978-619-5685 Dear Ms. Engler, On behalf of the City of Salem, Massachusetts, I’m writing to respectfully request the issuance of a Notice to Proceed with the preparation of an amend- ment to a Municipal Harbor Plan and Designated Port Area (“DPA”) Master Plan (collectively the “Harbor Plan”) by the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management (“CZM”) in accordance with the provisions of 301 CMR 23.03.
    [Show full text]