Appendix 1: Chronology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix 1: Chronology Appendix 1: Chronology 1789 16–17 July 1789 The comte d’Artois departs Paris for emigration. With him go the prince de Condé, the prince de Conti, the Polignacs and others from the Versailles set. late July The Great Fear provides incentive for early emigration. 4–5 August 1789 The decrees of 10–11 August 1789 formalising the decisions taken on the night of 4–5 August increase the number of departures. 5–6 October 1789 The ‘journées d’octobre’ reinforce emigration trends. 1790 13 February Religious orders are disbanded. 12 July The Civil Constitution of the Clergy voted by the Constituent Assembly. 22 December Any émigré occupying a governmental position must return within a month or lose his salary. 1791 19 February Departure of the King’s aunts, Madames Adedaïde and Victoire to Turin. Emigration is discussed for the first time in the Assembly. 10 March Pope officially condemns the Civil Constitution of the Clergy, and diplomatic relations with the papacy cease. 15 June Émigré units are being organised under the leadership of the comte d’Artois at Coblenz. 21 June The flight to Varennes prompts the closure of the fron- tiers and signals the King’s lack of support for the Revolution. 23 June The comte de Provence emigrates. He crosses the frontier to Mons and on the 27th meets the comte d’Artois in Brussels. 9 July A triple tax is imposed on émigrés if they have not returned within a month. 27 August Declaration of Pillnitz. 25 September The death penalty is allocated for crimes involving persons taking arms against France. 30 September Constitutional Assembly declares a political amnesty. 14 October Declaration of Louis XVI calling for the return of his brothers from emigration. 20 October Brissot demands military action to disperse the émigré forces. 31 October Decree deprives the comte de Provence of his rights to regency (vetoed by the King on 11 November). 185 186 Appendix 1 9 November Law against the émigrés: death for conspirators and sequestration of their property (this is also vetoed by the King, 11 November 1791). 27 November Oath of allegiance to the Civil Constitution of the Clergy is made obligatory for all clergy. 29 November Legislative Assembly requests the King take diplomatic action to secure the disbanding of émigré military units. 1792 2 January Decree of impeachment against the comte de Provence, the comte d’Artois, the prince de Condé, Calonne and other politically prominent émigrés. 14 January Complicity with the émigrés is regarded as a crime of lèse-nation. 18 January The comte de Provence is stripped of his rights to regency. 9 February Sequestration of émigré land decreed. 25 March French government requests that the Holy Roman Emperor disperse the émigrés on his territory. 8 April Law codifying and extending existing émigré laws. 17 July Émigré land to be sold off as bien nationaux. 15 August Families of émigrés put under permanent surveillance. 26 August Clergy who have not taken an oath of allegiance to the new government are to leave France within two weeks or be deported to Guiana. 30 August Relatives of émigrés excluded from holding public office. 2–6 September September Massacres. 20 September Emigration is accepted as sufficient grounds for divorce. 23 October All émigrés banished in perpetuity. Death as outlaws if they are caught in France. 24 October Sequestration and sale of movable property of émigrés. 26 November Returned émigrés to leave Paris within 24 hours, to leave France within a week. 4 December Royalist press is outlawed. 1793 21 January Execution of Louis XVI. His brothers Provence and Artois proclaim Louis XVII who is still imprisoned in the Temple. Provence proclaims himself Regent. 3 February Britain enters the war against Revolutionary France. 14 February A reward of 100 livres is decreed for capturing an émigré. 28 March–5 April The most important codification of émigré legislation is enacted. It draws together and completes all the previous laws relating to the émigrés. Émigrés are henceforth considered to be legally dead and no longer citizens of France. 28 March The death penalty is decreed for anyone seeking to re-establish the monarchy. Appendix 1 187 17 September Law of Suspects introduced a definition of suspect which implicated all relatives of émigrés. 7 December The property of children whose parents have emigrated may be confiscated by the State. 1794 13 March Ex-nobles are forbidden from living in Paris or in frontier towns and ports. 20 April Refractory priests are legally qualified as émigrés. June 1794 The Comte de Provence establishes himself in Verona. 15 November The anti-emigration legislation is examined but retained by the Thermidorean government. 1795 11 January An amnesty is issued to all peasants and workers from Alsace who emigrated in spring–summer 1794 to avoid the Terror. 8 June Death of Louis XVII in the Temple prison. 24 June Declaration of Verona. 21 July Quiberon Bay expedition ends in victory for the Republican forces. 22 August Constitution of Year III and the Law of Two Thirds voted. Two-thirds of the new legislature had to be made up of existing deputies. 19 September Émigré laws discussed in the Assembly and retained in force. 5 October 13 Vendémiaire rising in Paris. 25 October Law of 3 Brumaire is passed by which public office is denied to émigrés and their relatives. The anticlerical legislation of 1792 and 1793 which was not being strictly applied is re-implemented. 26 October Convention dissolves itself, allowing for the new council of the Directory to be convened. A political amnesty is proclaimed but it pointedly excludes émigrés and those involved in the Vendémiaire rising. 1796 16–17 April Councils decree the death penalty for persons advocating the restoration of the monarchy. 9 March Oath of hatred to royalty imposed on all civil servants. 26 July Louis XVIII moves to Blankenburg in the estates of the Duke of Brunswick and distances himself from the royalists in France who are in a strong position but who do not want absolute monarchy. 4 December Law of 3 Brumaire is reaffirmed and former leaders of chouans and Vendéan rebels are excluded from public office. 188 Appendix 1 1797 4 May Law of 3 Brumaire is amended to allow émigrés with provisional radiation to vote in the Year V elections. 27 June The Law of 3 Brumaire is withdrawn altogether. 5 September Coup d’État of Fructidor purges the councils of royalists and the Law of 3 Brumaire is re-implemented. A short amnesty is allowed to permit returned émigrés to return to exile. 29 November Ex-nobles are regarded as foreigners and excluded from public office. 1798 13 March Louis XVIII, invited by Paul I, establishes himself at Mittau. 1799 12 July Law of Hostages confers collective responsibility on relatives of émigrés for treasonable acts committed under civil war conditions. November Law of Hostage is repealed by Napoleon as First Consul and relatives of émigrés restored to full citizenship rights. 15 December Revolution is declared at an end. 1800–02 15 July 1801 Concordat signed with Pope Pius VII allows the clergy to return to France. 25 March 1802 Peace of Amiens includes an amnesty for émigrés providing they swear allegiance to the Constitution which binds them to give up plotting to restore the monarchy. Appendix 2: Figures and Table Source: PRO T.93-28. Figure A.1 Towns listed as lay émigré centres in the British Relief Lists after the re-inscription of 1796 191 192 Source: Public Records Office T.93-29. Figure A.2 Lay émigrés receiving relief from the British government, 1794–97 Source: This diagram comes from a mixture of sources and represents all those lay émigrés whose previous address is recorded in PRO T.93. 193 Figure A.3 Place of origin given by the refugees in London 194 Source: Public Records Office T.93-8. Figure A.4 Money-flow into the voluntary relief fund in its first year Figure A.5 Date of emigration from France (Note that this does not always correspond with arrival in Britain) 195 Source: Public Records Office T. 93–57 196 Figure A.6 Émigrés in and outside London Source: Public Records Office T.93-28. 197 Figure A.7 Refugee addresses in London 198 Appendix 2 Source: Public Records Office T.93-8. Figure A.8 British subscribers to the voluntary relief fund Source: Public Records Office T.93-29. 199 Figure A.9 Servants receiving relief, 1794–97 200 Source: Public Records Office T.93-29. Figure A.10 Gender analysis of servants receiving relief after 1796 Appendix 2 201 Source: Public Records Office T.93-57. Figure A.11 Lay émigrés receiving relief in 1797 202 Appendix 2 Source: Public Records Office T.93-16. Figure A.12 Lay émigrés receiving relief in 1799 Source: Public Records Office T.93-3. 203 Figure A.13 All émigrés receiving relief in October 1801 204 Source: Public Records Office T.93-3. Figure A.14 All émigrés receiving relief in March 1802 Appendix 2 205 Table A.1 Statistical breakdown of lay émigrés receiving relief, 1794–97 Men Women Children Domestics Total Men Women 1794 Jul. 296 210 176 106 788 Aug. 278 223 160 127 788 Sep. 376 269 204 169 1018 Oct. 410 295 235 198 1138 Nov. 339 271 207 167 984 Dec. 473 366 277 275 1391 1795 Jan. 550 453 348 364 1715 Feb. 546 466 328 364 1704 Mar. 584 492 356 391 1823 Apr. 559 501 350 406 1816 May 604 541 388 451 1984 Jun. 568 564 398 468 1998 Jul.
Recommended publications
  • The French Revolution Unfolds
    WH07_te_ch06_s02_MOD_s.fm Page 216 Monday, March 5, 2007 5:24WH07MOD_se_CH06_s02_s.fm PM Page 216 Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:17 PM Step-by-Step SECTION Instruction 2 Women march WITNESS HISTORY AUDIO to the palace. Parisian Women Storm Versailles Objectives On October 5, 1789, anger turned to action as thousands As you teach this section, keep students of women marched from Paris to Versailles. They wanted focused on the following objectives to help the king to stop ignoring their suffering. They also them answer the Section Focus Question wanted the queen. French women were particularly angry and master core content. 2 with the Austrian-born queen, Marie Antoinette. They 2 could not feed their children, yet she lived extravagantly. ■ Explain how the political crisis of 1789 The women yelled as they looked for her in the palace: led to popular revolts. Death to the Austrian! We’ll wring her neck! ■ Summarize the moderate reforms “ We’ll tear her heart out! enacted by the National Assembly in —mob of women at Versailles,” October 6, 1789 August 1789. Focus Question What political and social reforms did ■ Identify additional actions taken by the the National Assembly institute in the first stage of the National Assembly as it pressed French Revolution? onward. ■ Analyze why there was a mixed reac- tion around Europe to the events unfolding in France. The French Revolution Unfolds Objectives Excitement, wonder, and fear engulfed France as the revolution Prepare to Read • Explain how the political crisis of 1789 led to unfolded at home and spread abroad. Historians divide this revo- popular revolts.
    [Show full text]
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • NORMAN HAMPSON Norman Hampson 1922–2011
    NORMAN HAMPSON Norman Hampson 1922–2011 ‘NORMAN WAS ALWAYS LUCKY’, said his father when he married Jacqueline Gardin in 1948.1 Norman Hampson never doubted it, knowing that the happiest events in his life came about by chance. They left him profoundly convinced that history, too, develops by chances that historians habitually underestimate, and his deepest instincts left him sceptical of all forms of historical determinism. He did not consciously set out to be a professional historian, much less a historian of France. He was born on 8 April 1922 in Leyland and grew up in industrial Lancashire. His mother, Elizabeth Fazackerley, bore a very ancient Lancashire name. His father, Frank Hampson, was clerk to the Education Authority. Neither came from an educated background, but their efforts to compensate through their two sons won them entry to the most prestigious school in the north, Manchester Grammar School. Here Norman at first followed his much revered elder brother (who went on to become a consultant surgeon) on the science side, though all the while developing a passion for all forms of literature, from the classics, at which he excelled, down to modern English poetry. Only in the sixth form did he finally abandon science. Throughout his life he could quote pages of Shakespeare by heart, and in the sixth form he and Norman Swallow, later a pioneering television producer, established a literary magazine, Phoenix, which carried on with the help of his father some years after he had left school. Haunting Manchester bookshops on his way home, he also began to write his own poems, and even a short novel.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline (PDF)
    Timeline of the French Revolution 1789 1793 May 5 Estates General convened in Versailles Jan. 21 Execution of Louis XVI (and later, Marie Jun. 17 National Assembly Antoinette on Oct. 16) Jun. 20 Tennis Court Oath Feb. 1 France declares war on British and Dutch (and Jul. 11 Necker dismissed on Spain on Mar. 7) Jul. 13 Bourgeois militias in Paris Mar. 11 Counterrevolution starts in Vendée Jul. 14 Storming of the Bastille in Paris (official start of Apr. 6 Committee of Public Safety formed the French Revolution) Jun. 1-2 Mountain purges Girondins Jul. 16 Necker recalled Jul. 13 Marat assassinated Jul. 20 Great Fear begins in the countryside Jul. 27 Maximilien Robespierre joins CPS Aug. 4 Abolition of feudalism Aug. 10 Festival of Unity and Indivisibility Aug. 26 Declaration of Rights of Man and the Citizen Sept. 5 Terror the order of the day Oct. 5 Adoption of Revolutionary calendar 1791 1794 Jun. 20-21 Flight to Varennes Aug. 27 Declaration of Pillnitz Jun. 8 Festival of the Supreme Being Jul. 27 9 Thermidor: fall of Robespierre 1792 1795 Apr. 20 France declares war on Austria (and provokes Prussian declaration on Jun. 13) Apr. 5/Jul. 22 Treaties of Basel (Prussia and Spain resp.) Sept. 2-6 September massacres in Paris Oct. 5 Vendémiare uprising: “whiff of grapeshot” Sept. 20 Battle of Valmy Oct. 26 Directory established Sept. 21 Convention formally abolishes monarchy Sept. 22 Beginning of Year I (First Republic) 1797 Oct. 17 Treaty of Campoformio Nov. 21 Berlin Decree 1798 1807 Jul. 21 Battle of the Pyramids Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6: the French Revolution and Napoleon
    Chapter 6: The French Revolution and Napoleon Unit 2: Enlightenment and Revolution (1700-1850) Section 1: On the Eve of Revolution Chapter 6: The French Revolution and Napoleon (1789-1815) French Revolution Section 1: Terms and People ancien régime – the government in pre-revolution France estate – social class bourgeoisie – the middle class deficit spending – when a government spends more money than it takes in Louis XVI – king of France from 1774 to 1792; executed in 1793 Jacques Necker – a financial advisor to Louis XVI Estates-General – the legislative body consisting of representatives of the three estates cahier – notebook used during the French Revolution to record grievances Tennis Court Oath – an oath taken by the members of the National Assembly to meet wherever the circumstances might require until they had created a constitution Bastille – fortress in Paris used as a prison; French Revolution began when Parisians stormed it in 1789 Cause #1: Enlightenment Ideas New ideas about power and authority began to spread among the Third Estate. People began to question the structure of society using words such as equality, liberty, and democracy. The success of the American revolution inspired many people to begin to discuss the radical views of Rousseau and Voltaire. Cause #2: Economic Crisis There was Deficit spending (govt. spent more than it took in) The Seven Years War = Strained the Treasury The government borrowed more $$$$ The upper class resisted any taxes Bad weather created a food shortage Bread prices doubled
    [Show full text]
  • The Justification of Violence Within the Principles of Maximilien
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@Providence Providence College DigitalCommons@Providence History Student Papers History Spring 2013 A Plagued Mind: The uJ stification of Violence within the Principles of Maximilien Robespierre Kevin Lynch Providence College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/history_students Part of the European History Commons, and the Political History Commons Lynch, Kevin, "A Plagued Mind: The usJ tification of Violence within the Principles of Maximilien Robespierre" (2013). History Student Papers. Paper 9. http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/history_students/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at DigitalCommons@Providence. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Student Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Providence. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTRODUCTION Maximilien Francois Marie Isidore de Robespierre entered the world with humble beginnings on the 6th of May, 1758. In spite of the immense sufferings he endured in his youth, Maximilien Robespierre persevered through these struggles by dedicating himself wholly to his studies. In keeping with his family tradition, Robespierre became a lawyer in his hometown of Arras, working as tirelessly as he had in his childhood. At a first glance of Robespierre’s beginning, it seemed unlikely his life would become as tumultuous as the time he lived. Better yet, it seemed closer to an outright impossibility that he would directly play a role in a revolution that fundamentally changed the society of France, and indeed Europe, forever. The lawyer from Arras rose in simultaneous speed with the French Revolution, although he never saw it completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Portraits of the Prince Ladislas-Sigismund Vasa from the Collections in Wawel Castle Re-Examined
    Rocznik Historii Sztuki, tom XXXVII PAN WDN, 2012 KATARZYNA KRZYŻAGÓRSKA-PISAREK INDEPENDENT ART HISTORIAN LONDON TWO PORTRAITS OF THE PRINCE LADISLAS-SIGISMUND VASA FROM THE COLLECTIONS IN WAWEL CASTLE RE-EXAMINED INTRODUCTION This article aims to re-evaluate the existing evidence concerning the attribution and provenance of the two portraits of the Polish Prince Ladislas-Sigismund (1595–1648), later King Ladislas IV, formerly ascribed to the Flemish master Peter Paul Rubens, and now to his workshop and his school or circle respectively. Both pictures are at present in the Wawel Castle in Cracow, and are the two most important works associated with Rubens and his studio in Poland. As both paintings originally came from British collection, so they might benefit from being reviewed from this perspective. The first one is a half-length (to the knees) portrait on long-term loan from the Metropolitan Museum, New York1, described there as workshop of Peter Paul Rubens, Ladislas-Sigismund IV, King of Poland, c. 1624, oil on canvas, 49¼ ϋ 39¾ in. or 125.1 ϋ 101 cm, Inv. n. 29.100.13 (fig. 1). The second one is a full-length equestrian portrait by the school or circle of Rubens, Ladislas-Sigismund, Prince of Poland on horseback, after 1624, oil on canvas, 259 ϋ 185.5 cm, Wawel Castle, Cracow, State Collection of Art, Inv. n. 6320 (fig. 3). Later known as King Ladislas IV, the Polish Prince was the son of the King Sigismund III Vasa and his first wife Anne of Austria (1573–1598), also known as Anna Habsburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Van, Anatomy of a Revolutionary: a Comparative
    Van 1 Thomas Van Doctor Christina Devlin ENGL 102 11 May 2021 ABSTRACT Maximilien Robespierre and the French Revolution and Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge offer a deeper insight into the nature of the relationship between human psychology, ideology, society, and violence. The two revolutionary leaders, Robespierre and Pol Pot, shared similar upbringings. They were made to look and consider the problems their societies were facing while they were born in privilege and received elite educations. Coming to power, these men sought to cure the ills, or perceived ills, of their societies; they possessed grand visions of what their societies should look like. To realize their societies, violence was their tool of choice, though the violence in France took a different tone than that in Cambodia. The tones of violence reflected the particularities and circumstances of either regime. In France, disorder and anti-revolutionary activity required the French regime to fight violently for its grip on power; therefore, no small effort was put into maintaining law and order. On the other hand, in Cambodia, no such issue was present. The Khmer Regime faced no similar threat to its power, and therefore could focus its efforts on violently creating their ideal society. Van 2 Anatomy of a Revolutionary: A Comparative Analysis of Maximilien Robespierre and Pol Pot Maximilien Robespierre and the French Revolution and Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge help us search for common patterns between two events, ideologies, and individuals in order to ultimately better understand the human capacity for cruelty. The points of comparison will be simplified into: the event, the individual, the ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Revolution
    The French Revolution ‘This is more than a history of the French Revolution. It covers all Europe during the revolutionary period, though events in France naturally take first place. It is particularly good on the social and intellectual back- ground. Surprisingly enough, considering that Lefebvre was primarily an economic historian, it also breaks new ground in its account of international relations, and sets the wars of intervention in their true light. The French have a taste for what they call works of synthesis, great general summaries of received knowledge. We might call them textbooks, though of the highest level. At any rate, in its class, whether synthesis or textbook, this is one of the best ever produced.’ A. J. P. Taylor Georges Lefebvre The French Revolution From its origins to 1793 Translated by Elizabeth Moss Evanson With a foreword by Paul H. Beik London and New York La Révolution française was first published in 1930 by Presses Universitaires de France. A new, entirely rewritten, version was published in 1951. The present work is a translation of the first three parts of the revised edition of 1957. First published in the United Kingdom 1962 by Routledge and Kegan Paul First published in Routledge Classics 2001 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” © 1962 Columbia University Press All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: British and French Relations with the Netherlands
    Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: British and French Relations with the Netherlands, 1785-1815 Graeme Edward Callister PhD University of York Department of History September 2013 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the interplay of public opinion, national identity and foreign policy during the period 1785-1815, focusing on three consistently interconnected countries: the Netherlands, France and Great Britain. The Netherlands provides the centrepiece to the study, which considers how the Dutch were perceived as a nation, a people and as a political entity, at both governmental and popular levels, in the three countries throughout the period. Public opinion is theorised as a two-part phenomenon. Active public opinion represents the collated thoughts and responses of a certain public to an event or set of circumstances. Latent public opinion represents the sum of generally-accepted underlying social norms, stereotypes or preconceptions; the perceptions and representations latently present in unconscious mentalités. The thesis examines how perceptions and representations of the Netherlands in all three countries fed into public opinion and, ultimately, into national identity either of the self or the ‘other’. It then investigates the extent to which the triangular policies of Britain, France and the various incarnations of the Dutch state were shaped by popular perceptions, identities and opinion. While active opinion is shown to have generally been of negligible importance to the policy-making process, it is argued that the underlying themes of latent opinion often provided the conceptual background that politicians from all three countries used to make policy. The influence of latent opinion was often as much unconscious as deliberate.
    [Show full text]
  • French Revolution and the Trial of Marie Antoinette Background Guide Table of Contents
    French Revolution And The Trial Of Marie Antoinette Background Guide Table of Contents Letter from the Chair Letter from the Crisis Director Committee Logistics Introduction to the Committee Introduction to Topic One History of the Problem Past Actions Taken Current Events Questions to Consider Resources to Use Introduction to Topic Two History of the Problem Past Actions Taken Current Events Questions to Consider Resources to Use Bibliography Staff of the Committee Chair: Peyton Coel Vice Chair: Owen McNamara Crisis Director: Hans Walker Assistant Crisis Director: Sydney Steger Coordinating Crisis Director: Julia Mullert Under Secretary General Elena Bernstein Taylor Cowser, Secretary General Neha Iyer, Director General Letter from the Chair Hello Delegates! I am so thrilled to welcome you all to BosMUN XIX. For our returning delegates, welcome back! For our new delegates, we are so excited to have you here and hope you have an amazing time at the conference. My name is Peyton Coel and I am so honored to be serving as your Chair for this incredible French Revolution committee. I’m a freshman at Boston University double majoring in History and International Relations. I’m from the frigid Champlain Valley in Vermont, so the winters here in Boston are no trouble at all for me. When I’m not rambling on about fascinating events in history or scouring the news for important updates, you can find me playing club water polo or swimming laps in the lovely FitRec pool, exploring the streets of Boston (Copley is my favorite place to go), and painting beautiful landscapes with the help of Bob Ross.
    [Show full text]
  • The Austrian Army Lee Eysturlid Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy, [email protected]
    Illinois Math and Science Academy DigitalCommons@IMSA Faculty Publications & Research History and Social Science 2015 The Austrian Army Lee Eysturlid Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.imsa.edu/hss_pr Part of the European History Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Eysturlid, Lee. "The Austrian Army." In European Armies of the French Revolution, 1789-1802, 64-85. Vol. 50. Campaigns & Commanders. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 2015. Accessed MONTH DAY, YEAR. http://digitalcommons.imsa.edu/hss_pr/14/. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the History and Social Science at DigitalCommons@IMSA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications & Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@IMSA. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. CHAPTER 3 THE AUSTRIAN ARMY LEE EYSTURLID uring the long, on-again-off-again wars generated by the events D of the French Revolution, the Habsburg monarchy would con- tribute the largest single contingent of troops to the fight.1 For the Austrians, the wars fought over this nine-year period were a long- term disaster. Entering the war with a small, professional army, the monarchy would constantly be at loose ends to find the financ- ing and manpower to carry out the demands of a European-wide war. Worse yet, and critical to remember, was that the disparate Habsburg lands were incapable of the political revolution that had allowed a homogenous France to mobilize so many men and such vast resources.
    [Show full text]