Israeli Settlement in the Occupied Territories

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Israeli Settlement in the Occupied Territories REPORT ON ISRAELI SETTLEMENT IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES A Bimonthly Publication of the Foundation for Middle East Peac e Volum e 21 N umber 1 January-February 2011 EGYPT AT CENTER STAGE By Geoffrey Aronson we, as Jews, have been within the broad The Americans do not have borders of the Land of Israel not tens or The historic popular revolt in Egypt a plan at present. They do not hundreds of years, but thousands of threatens more than the sclerotic regime have an outline. They do not years. When the Palestinians talk about of President Hosni Mubarak. A “new historic rights, they should remember Middle East”—from Tunis to Baghdad, have a vision. “We don’t know that they have been there a shorter time. and from Beirut to Cairo—is emerging, what we want, because we The rights of the Jews to Hebron, Beit with Washington on the sidelines. In don’t know what Netanyahu El, Rachel’s Tomb and Shilo are greater Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin wants,” an administration and much more significant. Therefore Netanyahu has confounded President source said. “If we knew, we these places should remain in our hands Barack Obama’s unprecedented, if ill- would prepare. We would in any arrangement.” executed effort to curb settlement Despite declarations to the contrary, expansion. Washington’s energy for con - draw up an initiative. But the U.S. effort to revitalize talks in the fronting Israel on settlements, after Netanyahu is not willing to wake of the failure of the settlement what Netanyahu described as eighteen tell us what he really wants.” freeze effort lacks both content and months of “completely useless discus - Nahum Barnea, Yediot commitment. Instability in Egypt virtu - sions,” evaporated. All eyes are fixed on Aharonot , December 17, 2010 ally assures an extended “time out” in Cairo. U.S. efforts. Even before the uprising in In the West Bank, a milestone of a Egypt, Nabil Shaath, a top advisor to different sort has been reached. The of increase. Another 200,000 Israelis Palestinian Authority president Mah- deployment of Israeli troops in the West live across the Green Line in East moud Abbas, said that the peace process Bank is at its lowest point since the days Jerusalem. Israel’s bi-annual budget for with Israel was in a “coma.” He describ- before the outbreak of the first intifada 2011–2012 includes more than half a ed Washington’s proposals as “pointless.” in December 1987. Not even during the billion dollars in identifiable items for On this last point at least, Palestin- heady days of the Olso era in the 1990s settlements, settler subsidies, and associ - ians and Israelis agree. Weeks before the have Israelis considered their position ated infrastructure. According to eruption of the historic events in Tunis- on the West Bank to be as secure as Ha’aretz , however, “most of the settle - ia and Egypt, Yediot Aharonot reported today. Even the absence of a diplomatic ment budget is hidden in unspecified that Netanyahu’s office let it be known process is viewed as positive by the budget allocations.” The budget includes “that negotiations with the Palestinians Israeli security establishment. According funds for newer settlements, the so would not be given top priority by the to a November 28, 2010 report in called “outposts,” which Israel has com - American mediators. The prevalent Ha’aretz , “the Central Command esti - mitted to dismantle. assessment among [Israeli] decision- mates attempts of this sort [i.e. Hamas- Israel worries about Egypt, but it is makers is that the Obama administra - led attacks on settlers] will increase if complacent about relations with the tion will continue to chatter about its talks are renewed.” Notwithstanding the Palestinians. In his biannual appearance intentions of moving the process for - 10 month construction moratorium, the before the Knesset Foreign Affairs and ward but will not push the Netanyahu West Bank settler population increased Defense Committee earlier this year, government into a corner and will not during 2010 by 4.5 percent or 15,000— Netanyahu reiterated a maximalist view pose demands that could endanger the to 327,800, a rate more than one and a of Israel’s territorial aspirations, “It coalition.” N half times greater than the national rate should be remembered,” he said, “that TO OUR READERS FOUNDATION FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE The mass popular uprisings in Tunisia Above all, a new American policy must and Egypt are stunning evidence that offer stronger leadership to resolve the Merle Thorpe, Jr. Middle Easterners are no exception to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the central cause Founder trend of modern history that flows toward of anti-American hostility and loss of U.S. (1917–1994) freedom, democracy, and human dignity. influence in the region. Our ability to This trend is non-linear and usually messy. shape broader changes is limited. But Philip C. Wilcox, Jr. It is much too early to predict whether resolving this core conflict is within our President the Egyptian revolt will bring real reform grasp because of our unique and supportive Geoffrey Aronson there, and whether protests elsewhere will ties with Israel. The U.S. has failed to use Director, Research and succeed. But change is coming, and the this relationship to persuade Israel to Publications, Editor, Report on leaders of the “security states” that have reverse its self-destructive and unjust poli - Israeli Settlement in the Occupied dominated the region must adapt or con - cies of settlement and occupation of the Territories front even greater public alienation and Palestinians, which are an affront to Nitzan Goldberger instability. Adapting to this change poses a American values and threaten violence and Waseem Mardini hard challenge to the U.S., which has been instability. A comprehensive U.S. plan for a Editorial Assistants allied with these regimes, for reasons of two-state resolution of the Israeli-Palestin- security and counterterrorism, and in ian conflict should therefore be a center - Marc Mason Intern Egypt’s case, peace with Israel. Protection piece of a new U.S. Middle East policy that of American strategic interests will require would restore American influence, respond IN MEMORIAM closer and more credible identification with to Arab aspirations, and protect our strate - Peter A. Gubser the political aspirations of the Arab people, gic interests. (1941–2010) a willingness to engage with Islamists, and DIRECTORS more priority to diplomacy as the best means of resolving conflict. Landrum R. Bolling Calvin H. Cobb, Jr. —————— N —————— James J. Cromwell Stephen Hartwell Richard S.T. Marsh Richard W. Murphy Jean C. Newsom Gail Pressberg William B. Quandt Nicholas A. Veliotes The Foundation, a non-profit I.R.C. 501(c)(3) organization, supports peace and security for Israelis and Palestinians through mutual recognition and a negotiated division of historic Palestine. It publishes the bi-monthly Report on Israeli Settlement in the Occupied Territories . Copyright © 2011 Sign up to receive the Report by e-mail, to be notified of events in Washington, D.C., and more. Visit us at www.fmep.org. 2 O Report on Israeli Settlement January-February 2011 AL-JAZEERA’S PALESTINE PAPERS In the wake of the September 2009 tripartite summit hosted by U.S. president Barack Obama, U.S. special envoy George Mitchell tried without success to win Israeli and Palestinian agreement on the Terms of Reference (ToRs) for a “relaunch” of direct negoti - ations. The document below, prepared by the Palestinian Negotiations Support Unit, is an excerpt of minutes of an October 21, 2009 discussion between Mitchell and Palestinian negotiator Sa’eb Erekat, recently released by Al-Jazeerra. GM: . This morning, however, we want to have a spe - cannot decide if they want two states. They want to keep set - cific discussion on the ToRs and side letters. We are making tling in the areas of my state. efforts to find language that is satisfactory to you. Then we GM: But they will settle more if you continue this way. will make an effort to get Israeli agreement. We under - SE: Then we announce the one state and the struggle for stand your preference for the 67 and swaps language. Because equality in the state of Israel. You either have a decision you told us you accept there will be adjustments—with the so for peace or a decision for settlements. You cannot have both. called blocs—that will be offset by benefits to you. We need Maybe as people keep saying that we never miss an opportu - as straightforward a formulation of that concept as possible: nity to miss an opportunity, but we were never given an An independent and viable state encompassing all of the terri - opportunity, not my grandparents or my parents, like I am not tory that was occupied in 1967 or its equivalent in value. being given an opportunity. … GM: You’ve expressed your frustration over the last 19 GM: . Now we need to think of the context in which years. But I tell you there has never been a president on this this language can occur. Only way is issue like this one. You are denying to set the US belief. I emphasize this How can I convince anyone if him the opportunity to create the is not a done deal. [President Obama] could not even state that you want. By saying one The issue of territory has figured deliver a temporary settlement freeze? state you are telling him to get out, prominently in our discussions. even though you negotiated with It’s not up to me to decide your credi - The US believes that through good every Israeli government before faith negotiations the parties can mutu - bility in the Middle East.
Recommended publications
  • Post-Election Coalition Scenarios, Part II by David Eden
    Post-Election Coalition Scenarios, Part II by David Eden Two other parties that may be possible coalition partners: · United Torah Judaism – Essentially, it is only concerned with internal issues. Its real demand is maintaining social services and allowances for their constituents. Other issues: Maintaining the powers of the Orthodox Rabbinical Courts over civil issues such as marriage, divorce, burial, etc. are among their top priorities, along with maintaining the Sabbath laws preventing work on the “Holy Day”, laws keeping ultra-Orthodox youth out of army service, etc. Although their constituency is sympathetic to the settlers and the Right, the leadership stresses that they are willing to support any coalition that accedes to their demands. As Olmert does not need them to guarantee the stability of the coalition, he won’t be “courting” them. Some of the issues that may affect their position in coalition negotiations are their rivalry with Shas and their often-confrontational relations with Meretz and groups within the Labor party over freedom of religion. · Meretz – The party that is the Israeli equivalent of the “Democratic wing of the Democratic Party”, Meretz and its predecessors have been at the forefront of not only the contacts that led to direct negotiations between Israel and the PLO (and the ensuing Oslo Accords), but from the earliest days after the creation of the State of Israel also have led the struggle for equal rights for Israel’s Arab citizens, labor & union rights, women’s rights, freedom of the press and freedom of religion issues, gay rights, etc. It endorses negotiated withdrawal from almost all of the West Bank, including parts of Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Energy and Business Conference 2011
    Financial & Strategic Consulting Israel Energy and Business Conference 2011 November 28-29, 2011 Kfar Hamaccabiya Hotel, Ramat Gan, Israel Monday, November 28, 2011 08:00 – 09:00 Gathering and registration in exhibition hall 09:00 – 11:00 Plenary Session: Secure and Clean Energy – Objectives and Challenges Introduction Lectures: Dr. Amit Mor, CEO, Eco Energy Dr. Uzi Landau, Minister of National Infrastructures Mr. William N. Bryan, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration, U.S. Department of Energy Panel: Ministers of Energy Moderator: Dr. Amit Mor, CEO, Eco Energy Brigadier General (Res.) Effie Eitam, President, Genie Energy International Dr. Uzi Landau, Minister of National Infrastructures Adv. Yosef Paritzky Adv. Moshe Shachal, M. Shachal Law Office Ceremony Honoring Person of the Year in the Energy Sector 11:00 – 11:30 Coffee Break 11:30 – 13:00 Plenary Session: Sustainable Energy Development: Israel and the World** Introduction Lecture: MK Gilad Erdan, Minister of Environmental Protection Moderator: Adv. Alona Shefer, Director-General, Ministry of Environmental Protection Mr. Franzjosef Schafhausen, Deputy Director General, Environment and Energy, Federal Ministry of Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety, Berlin Mr. Ethan Zindler, Global Head of Policy Research, Bloomberg New Energy Finance, London Mr. Hezi Zaieg, Director, Israel Investment Center, Ministry of Industry Trade and Labor 1 Financial & Strategic Consulting 13:00 – 14:00 Lunch 14:00 – 15:25 Parallel Sessions A The Israeli and international fuel Additional Uses of Natural Gas Energy Efficiency economy Natural gas use in Strategies and governance for Changes in trade, distillation transportation efficiency and conservation and storage of fuel in international markets Use of Methanol for Project financing and ESCO's transportation model Obstacles to competition in the fuel economy Uses for petrochemical and Technologies and industry fertilizers experience The fuel economy and the Speakers: Speakers: environment Chairperson: Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yitzhar – a Case Study Settler Violence As a Vehicle for Taking Over Palestinian Land with State and Military Backing
    Yitzhar – A Case Study Settler violence as a vehicle for taking over Palestinian land with state and military backing August 2018 Yitzhar – A Case Study Settler violence as a vehicle for taking over Palestinian land with state and military backing Position paper, August 2018 Research and writing: Yonatan Kanonich Editing: Ziv Stahl Additional Editing: Lior Amihai, Miryam Wijler Legal advice: Atty. Michael Sfard, Atty. Ishai Shneidor Graphic design: Yuda Dery Studio English translation: Maya Johnston English editing: Shani Ganiel Yesh Din Public council: Adv. Abeer Baker, Hanna Barag, Dan Bavly, Prof. Naomi Chazan, Ruth Cheshin, Akiva Eldar, Prof. Rachel Elior, Dani Karavan, Adv. Yehudit Karp, Paul Kedar, Dr. Roy Peled, Prof. Uzy Smilansky, Joshua Sobol, Prof. Zeev Sternhell, Yair Rotlevy. Yesh Din Volunteers: Rachel Afek, Dahlia Amit, Maya Bailey, Hanna Barag, Michal Barak, Atty. Dr. Assnat Bartor, Osnat Ben-Shachar, Rochale Chayut, Beli Deutch, Dr. Yehudit Elkana, Rony Gilboa, Hana Gottlieb, Tami Gross, Chen Haklai, Dina Hecht, Niva Inbar, Daniel A. Kahn, Edna Kaldor, Nurit Karlin, Ruth Kedar, Lilach Klein Dolev, Dr. Joel Klemes, Bentzi Laor, Yoram Lehmann RIP, Judy Lots, Aryeh Magal, Sarah Marliss, Shmuel Nachmully RIP, Amir Pansky, Talia Pecker Berio, Nava Polak, Dr. Nura Resh, Yael Rokni, Maya Rothschild, Eddie Saar, Idit Schlesinger, Ilana Meki Shapira, Dr. Tzvia Shapira, Dr. Hadas Shintel, Ayala Sussmann, Sara Toledano. Yesh Din Staff: Firas Alami, Lior Amihai, Yudit Avidor, Maysoon Badawi, Hagai Benziman, Atty. Sophia Brodsky, Mourad Jadallah, Moneer Kadus, Yonatan Kanonich, Atty. Michal Pasovsky, Atty. Michael Sfard, Atty. Muhammed Shuqier, Ziv Stahl, Alex Vinokorov, Sharona Weiss, Miryam Wijler, Atty. Shlomy Zachary, Atty.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Israeli Democracy Index Is Dedicated to Captain Zur Zarhi from Nahalal, a Beloved Friend Who Went to War and Did Not Come Back
    Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2007 Cohesion in a Divided Society Asher Arian, Nir Atmor, Yael Hadar The Israel Democracy Institute is an independent, non-partisan body on the seam of academia and politics. The Institute proposes policy recommendations and reforms for government and public administration agencies. In its plans and endeavors, the Institute strives to support the institutions of Israel’s developing democracy and consolidate its values. The Institute’s research is followed up by practical recommendations, seeking to improve governance in Israel and foster a long-term vision for a stable democratic regime adapted to the structure, the values, and the norms of Israeli society. The Institute aspires to further public discourse in Israel on the issues placed on the national agenda, to promote structural, political, and economic reforms, to serve as a consulting body to decision-makers and the broad public, to provide information, and present comparative research. Researchers at the Israel Democracy Institute are leading academics directing projects in various areas of society and governance in Israel. The IDI Press produces, markets, and distributes the results of their work in several series of books (“The Democracy Library”), policy papers, the Caesarea Forum Series, periodicals, and conference proceedings. The Guttman Center was established in its present form in 1998, when the Guttman Institute for Applied Social Research became part of the Israel Democracy Institute. Professor Louis Guttman founded the original Institute in 1949 as a pioneering center for the study of public opinion and the advancement of social science methodology. The goal of the Guttman Center is to enrich public discourse on issues of public policy through the information retrieved from the Center’s databases and through public opinion surveys conducted by the Center.
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/40/42 General Assembly
    United Nations A/HRC/40/42 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 January 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Fortieth session 25 February–22 March 2019 Agenda items 2 and 7 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan* Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Summary In the present report, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights describes the expansion of the settlement enterprise of Israel and its negative impact on the human rights of Palestinians. The focus of the report is on the effects of settler violence on Palestinians’ access to land and freedom of movement. It also addresses issues relating to Israeli settlements in the occupied Syrian Golan. The report covers the period from 1 November 2017 to 31 October 2018. * The present report was submitted after the deadline in order to reflect the most recent information. GE.19-01426(E) A/HRC/40/42 I. Introduction 1. The present report, submitted to the Human Rights Council pursuant to its resolution 37/36, provides an update on the implementation of that resolution from 1 November 2017 to 31 October 2018. It is based on monitoring and other information-gathering activities conducted by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and on information provided by other United Nations entities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and civil society in the occupied Syrian Golan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Purpose of This Paper Is to Assess Various Unilateral Evacuation
    CONFIDENTIAL NOT FOR CIRCULATION MEMORANDUM TO: DR. SAEB ERAKAT FROM: NSU SETTLEMENTS FILE SUBJECT: PRE-PERMANENT STATUS SETTLEMENT EVACUATIONS (PART I): AN ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING PROPOSALS DATE: 30 APRIL 2006 The purpose of this paper is to assess various unilateral evacuation proposals put forth thus far, including Kadima’s “convergence” plan, and their implications for Palestinian interests. I. BACKGROUND Since the evacuation of some 8,500 Israeli settlers from Gaza and four small West Bank settlements as part of Sharon’s unilateral “disengagement” plan, there are growing indications that Israel may seek to carry out further settlement evacuations (as distinct from military withdrawals or redeployments) on a unilateral basis. While a negotiated settlement evacuation remains the preferred strategic option for Palestinians, the growing acceptability of Israeli unilateralism in Israel and abroad suggests that Palestinians may be forced to prepare for the possibility of further disengagement-type evacuations prior to (or instead of) permanent status negotiations, most likely in the context of a “state with provisional borders”. Many in Israel and elsewhere appear to view further unilateral settlement evacuations with increasing favor, particularly if Israeli and/or international confidence in the PA continues to wane. A recent poll shows that a slight majority of Israelis (51%) would favor further unilateral ‘disengagement-type’ evacuations by Israel in the event of the Palestinian leadership’s inability to negotiate or deliver a permanent status deal.1 Indeed, Israeli and international support for unilateralism may now be even higher following Hamas’s recent election victory. A number of unilateral evacuation proposals have already been put forward since the Gaza evacuation, by both the Israeli “left” and “center”.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Cast Lead--Zion Fascism at Its Best
    South Asian Studies A Research Journal of South Asian Studies Vol. 29, No.2, July - December 2014, pp. 685-694 Operation Cast Lead--Zion Fascism at Its Best Umbreen Javaid University of Punjab, Lahore. Maliha Shamim University of Punjab, Lahore. Abstract Jews consider themselves to be the original inhabitants of Palestine. It has always been the official policy of Israel to occupy and populate the Palestinian territories. The victories in successive Arab-Israeli wars emboldened Israel to pursue its policy more vigorously. The Palestinians of occupied territories specially those living in West Bank and Gaza have to face the onslaught of Israeli atrocities. After breaking the truce entered into with Hamas, Israel attacked Gaza in December 2008, justifying the attacks as its right of self-defense. The Gazan operation named Operation Lead was not condemned by EU, US or European countries. To prepare the Israeli army for the Gaza offensive the troops were even religiously and politically brainwashed to successfully combat the Palestinians. The elections held after the Gaza offensive and extremist candidates returned to the Israeli parliament. Such extremist stance taken by Israeli public will go a long way in making the already biased Israeli society a more racist and fascist Israeli polity. In the absence of any criticism or condemnation of Israeli actions it pursues the murder and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians with impunity. Accumulation of latest weaponry and warring techniques have transformed Israel into a regional Sparta and religious extremism and fascism have come to assume an important place in today’s Israel. This article has been prepared with the help of newspapers and answers certain questions as why is Palestine most coveted by Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 from Survival to Destiny Download Sheet
    Survey: 73% oppose a Palestinian state 85% of them Survey: support SOVEREIGNTY ריבונות Sovereignty A APolitical Political Journal Journal / / Issue Issue no. no. 11 7 // AugustMarch 20192016 73% Published by The SovereigntyPublished by Women Movement in Green founded and the by Forum Women for Sovereignty in Green oppose a Palestinion state 85% of them support MAKINGSovereignty PROGRESS NRG Poll, Jan 2016: Are you in favor of the gradual application of Israeli Law in Judea and Samaria? 44% in favor 44% 38% of gradual application In favor Not in favor of Israeli law in Judea and Samaria 18% No opinion 60% 61% 61% 69% 18% 32% of the youth favor of rightwingers of ultra-orthodox of those who dene of those who dene of those who dene the application of favor the favor the themselves themselves as themselves as leftwing the law on the application of law application of law rightwing favor the leftwingers favor the favor the application of entire area on the entire area on the entire area gradual application application of the law the law on the Jewish of the law on the entire area communities From Survival to Destiny The Jewish "Deal of the Century" Minister Haim Katz: Rep. Alan Clemmons: David P. Goldman: TAMAWe need a declaration of commitment 100 forIt is impossible the for Land a Jew to be of Israel Judea and Samaria in to Judea and Samaria as there was an occupier in his own ancestral a region of failed states. STRATEGICfor the Golan OUTLINE Heights PLAN | ISRAEL 2048 homeland, Judea Time is on Israel’s side Page 4 Page6 Page 12 2 / SOVEREIGNTY22
    [Show full text]
  • West Bank Settlement Homes and Real Estate Occupation
    Neoliberal Settlement as Violent State Project: West Bank Settlement Homes and Real Estate Occupation Yael Allweil Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, Technion and Israel Institute for Advanced Studies [email protected] Abstract Intense ideological debates over the legal status of West Bank settlements and political campaigns objecting to or demanding their removal largely neglect the underlying capitalist processes that construct these settlements. Building upon the rich scholarship on the interrelations of militarism and capitalism, this study explores the relationship between capitalist and militarist occupation through housing development. Pointing to neoliberalism as central to the ways in which militarism and capitalism have played out in Israeli settlement dynamics since 1967, this paper unpacks the mutual dependency of the Israeli settlement project on real estate capitalism and neoliberal governance. Through historical study of the planning, financing, construction, and architecture of settlement dwellings as real estate, as well as interviews and analysis of settler-produced historiographies, this paper identifies the Occupied Territories (OT) as Israel’s testing ground for neoliberal governance and political economy. It presents a complementary historiography for the settlement project, identifying three distinct periods of settlement as the product of housing real estate: neoliberal experimentation (1967-1994), housing militarization (1994-2005), and “real-estate-ization” (2005-present). Drawing on Maron and Shalev
    [Show full text]
  • Violations of Civil and Political Rights in the Realm of Planning and Building in Israel and the Occupied Territories
    Violations of Civil and Political Rights in the Realm of Planning and Building in Israel and the Occupied Territories Shadow Report Submitted by Bimkom – Planners for Planning Rights Response to the State of Israel’s Report to the United Nations Regarding the Implementation of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights September 2014 Written by Atty. Sharon Karni-Kohn Edited by Elana Silver and Ma'ayan Turner Contributions by Cesar Yeudkin, Nili Baruch, Sari Kronish, Nir Shalev, Alon Cohen Lifshitz Translated from Hebrew by Jessica Bonn 1 Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….…5 Response to Pars. 44-48 in the State Report: Territorial Application of the Covenant………………………………………………………………………………5 Question 6a: Demolition of Illegal Construstions………………………………...5 Response to Pars. 57-59 in the State Report: House Demolition in the Bedouin Population…………………………………………………………………………....5 Response to Pars. 60-62 in the State Report: House Demolition in East Jerusalem…7 Question 6b: Planning in the Arab Localities…………………………………….8 Response to Pars. 64-77 in the State Report: Outline Plans in Arab Localities in Israel, Infrastructure and Industrial Zones…………………………………………………8 Response to Pars. 78-80 in the State Report: The Eastern Neighborhoods of Jerusalem……………………………………………………………………………10 Question 6c: State of the Unrecognized Bedouin Villages, Means for Halting House Demolitions and Proposed Law for Reaching an Arrangement for Bedouin Localities in the Negev, 2012…………………………………………...15 Response to Pars. 81-88 in the State Report: The Bedouin Population……….…15 Response to Pars. 89-93 in the State Report: Goldberg Commission…………….19 Response to Pars. 94-103 in the State Report: The Bedouin Population in the Negev – Government Decisions 3707 and 3708…………………………………………….19 Response to Par.
    [Show full text]
  • Excluded, for God's Sake: Gender Segregation and the Exclusion of Women in Public Space in Israel
    Excluded, For God’s Sake: Gender Segregation and the Exclusion of Women in Public Space in Israel המרכז הרפורמי לדת ומדינה -לוגו ללא מספר. Third Annual Report – December 2013 Israel Religious Action Center Israel Movement for Reform and Progressive Judaism Excluded, For God’s Sake: Gender Segregation and the Exclusion of Women in Public Space in Israel Third Annual Report – December 2013 Written by: Attorney Ruth Carmi, Attorney Ricky Shapira-Rosenberg Consultation: Attorney Einat Hurwitz, Attorney Orly Erez-Lahovsky English translation: Shaul Vardi Cover photo: Tomer Appelbaum, Haaretz, September 29, 2010 – © Haaretz Newspaper Ltd. © 2014 Israel Religious Action Center, Israel Movement for Reform and Progressive Judaism Israel Religious Action Center 13 King David St., P.O.B. 31936, Jerusalem 91319 Telephone: 02-6203323 | Fax: 03-6256260 www.irac.org | [email protected] Acknowledgement In loving memory of Dick England z"l, Sherry Levy-Reiner z"l, and Carole Chaiken z"l. May their memories be blessed. With special thanks to Loni Rush for her contribution to this report IRAC's work against gender segregation and the exclusion of women is made possible by the support of the following people and organizations: Kathryn Ames Foundation Claudia Bach Philip and Muriel Berman Foundation Bildstein Memorial Fund Jacob and Hilda Blaustein Foundation Inc. Donald and Carole Chaiken Foundation Isabel Dunst Naomi and Nehemiah Cohen Foundation Eugene J. Eder Charitable Foundation John and Noeleen Cohen Richard and Lois England Family Jay and Shoshana Dweck Foundation Foundation Lewis Eigen and Ramona Arnett Edith Everett Finchley Reform Synagogue, London Jim and Sue Klau Gold Family Foundation FJC- A Foundation of Philanthropic Funds Vicki and John Goldwyn Mark and Peachy Levy Robert Goodman & Jayne Lipman Joseph and Harvey Meyerhoff Family Richard and Lois Gunther Family Foundation Charitable Funds Richard and Barbara Harrison Yocheved Mintz (Dr.
    [Show full text]