DOCSLIB.ORG

Senator Oliver P. Morton and Historical Memory of the Civil War and Reconstruction in Indiana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Senator Oliver P. Morton and Historical Memory of the Civil War and Reconstruction in Indiana SENATOR OLIVER P. MORTON AND HISTORICAL MEMORY OF THE CIVIL WAR AND RECONSTRUCTION IN INDIANA Timothy C. Rainesalo Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Department of History, Indiana University February 2016 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Master's Thesis Committee __________________________________ Anita Morgan, Ph.D., Chair __________________________________ Stephen E. Towne, M.A. __________________________________ A. James Fuller, Ph.D. ii © 2016 Timothy C. Rainesalo iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS No one completes a lengthy writing project alone and I would like to thank a few of the people that helped with this one. I would not have finished this project without the help of my thesis committee, which has read each of my chapter drafts and helping me to reach my scholarly goals. Many thanks go to my thesis advisor, Dr. Anita Morgan, whose edits, patience, guidance, and suggestions provided clarity and sometimes much-needed direction for this project. Mr. Stephen E. Towne and Dr. A. James Fuller consistently provided new ideas and resources and suggested new and illuminating questions that have helped to strengthen my work. Words do not describe how grateful I am for their help, insight, patience, and encouragement. Several other professors provided support and deserve my thanks, including Drs. Kevin C. Robbins, Philip V. Scarpino, and Rebecca K. Shrum. I also owe a debt of gratitude to the Indiana Historical Society, and Indiana State Library for their research assistance. Finally, I must thank my family, especially my parents, whose constant words of encouragement and willingness to listen meant more to me than they will ever realize. I dedicate this work of scholarship to them. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 Chapter One: Morton the Senator (1865-1877) .................................................................16 Chapter Two: Morton’s Legacy in the Nineteenth Century (1877-1884) .........................50 Chapter Three: Morton in Twentieth Century Memory (1890-1907) ...............................87 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................122 Bibliography ....................................................................................................................127 Curriculum Vitae v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Bronze monument of Oliver P. Morton by Frank J. Simmons, 1884.................85 Figure 2: Marble statue of Oliver P. Morton by Charles H. Niehas, 1900 ......................100 Figure 3: Bronze monument of Oliver P. Morton by Rudolf Schwarz, 1907 ..................113 Figure 4: Bronze relief on proper left of Oliver P. Morton Monument, 1907 .................114 Figure 5: Bronze relief on proper right of Oliver P. Morton Monument, 1907 ...............114 vi Introduction When I arrived in Indianapolis in August 2012, I knew I wanted to add something to the analysis of Indiana’s Civil War history. My topic changed several times, but Oliver P. Morton remained a constant thread in every narrative. For a man with such a colorful, divisive history, his commanding presence in Indiana’s history of the Civil War is second perhaps only to the common Hoosier Union soldier. Why was such a prideful partisan held in such high regard—and why was he so closely tied to the veterans who claimed ownership of Monument Circle in downtown Indianapolis? How did he establish himself—and how did memories of his deeds and actions change over time? This thesis examines Indiana’s Governor and Senator Oliver P. Morton, using his postwar speeches, public commentary during and after his life, and the public testimonials and monuments erected in his memory to analyze his role in defining Indiana’s historical memories of the Civil War and Reconstruction from 1865 to 1907. Morton became famous for his wartime Republican governorship of Indiana from 1860 to 1866. He commanded more national influence as a Senator from 1867 to 1877 advocating for African American suffrage, but the monuments honoring his memory in Indianapolis and Washington, D. C., reflect Indiana funders’ desire to remember Morton as a Civil War Governor and to reinforce viewers’ awareness of the sacrifices and results of the war. I argue that the combined efforts of Morton’s friends, family, political colleagues, and Union veterans—especially influential members of the Indiana Grand Army of the Republic (GAR)—emphasized Morton’s governorship to use his legacy as a rallying point for curating and promoting certain partisan memories of the Civil War and, to a lesser extent, Reconstruction, in Indiana. 1 This analysis highlights the importance of Morton’s reciprocal relationship with Union veterans during and after the war, especially the Indiana GAR. As this fraternal organization’s political influence increased from 1884 to 1907, its members erected monuments in Indianapolis and Washington, D.C., and held ceremonies to honor Morton’s memory. These occasions also allowed them to shape and evoke memories of Morton to reinforce the values and ultimate lessons they thought Hoosiers needed to remember about the Civil War’s causes and veterans’ services. The editorials, eulogies, and correspondence produced by Morton’s friends, family, political colleagues, African Americans and especially journalists during and long after Morton’s life capture differing audiences’ memories of Morton’s deeds and creeds. Together these accounts and monuments contextualize Morton’s importance to Hoosiers looking for recognizable figureheads to represent Indiana, and to serve as touchstones in partisan debates about Hoosiers’ memories of the Civil War and Reconstruction from 1865 to 1907. While not the most popular Reconstruction era politician, Morton’s important role in Reconstruction politics is well-established in the historical literature. After arriving in Congress in 1867, Morton quickly became the Republican Party’s most outspoken Midwestern representative. Three dissertations – Leslie H. Schultz’s “Oliver P. Morton and Reconstruction, 1866-1877,” Everett O. Johnson’s “The Political Speaking of Oliver P. Morton,” and Edwin C. Carpenter’s “Political Rhetoric of Oliver P. Morton”—have all cogently outlined Morton’s major rhetorical themes and explored his motivations for altering his views on the controversial topics of African American emancipation and suffrage, southern Reconstruction, United States currency, and conditions for southern states’ reentry into the Union. They also summarize and identify the major rhetorical 2 themes that defined his speaking: distrust of southern-sympathizing Democrats, the righteousness of the Republican Party, and the need to protect Union sacrifices through appropriate (punitive) southern Reconstruction policies. Schultz, Johnson and Carpenter are also useful for analyzing the rhetorical structure and lines of argumentation inherent in Morton’s most influential political addresses.1 William Dudley Foulke’s 1899 two- volume biography helpfully divides Morton’s life according to the Governor and Senator’s most prominent political actions. Foulke’s account is thorough, but perhaps too one-sided and paints him as an eminently selfless political mastermind.2 These works also have limitations in their usefulness. While Johnson’s study is the most helpful for those interested in Morton’s Senatorial career, it typifies the limited understanding of Morton’s place in historical scholarship.3 Although immortalized as the “Great War Governor” in the public consciousness, the above studies have not analyzed in depth the importance of Morton’s senatorial actions, policies, and speeches in shaping the way different audiences (African Americans, civilians, veterans and politicians) remembered him. In particular, Morton’s lifelong ties to Civil War veterans provide ample opportunity to probe and question the reciprocal relationship between Morton and 1 Leslie H. Schultz, “Oliver P. Morton and Reconstruction: 1867-1877” (PhD. diss., University of Chicago, 1935); Everett Orville Johnson, “Oliver P. Morton: a study of his career as a public speaker and of his speaking on slavery, civil war, and reconstruction issues,” (PhD. diss., University of Michigan, 1957); Edwin Cecil Carpenter, “The Political Speaking of Oliver Perry Morton,” (PhD. diss., University of Illinois, 1966). 2 William Dudley Foulke, Life of Oliver P. Morton, 2 vols. (Indianapolis: The Bowen-Merrill Company, 1899). This study (necessarily) relies somewhat heavily on Foulke’s work to contextualize Morton’s past, but I have attempted to avoid painting Morton in the same heroic terms. 3 Johnson’s analysis of Morton’s rhetoric, while well-executed and researched, artificially limits the discussion of Morton’s political career by ending in 1868, when Morton reached his political ‘peak’ with his great defense of congressional Reconstruction. Few of the speeches Morton delivered during his second term from 1872 to 1877 have the same unique, galvanizing effect of his previous speeches, but they are still very important. In the wake of the economic Panic of 1873, Morton maintained his aggressive attacks against the Democrats and the South. This commitment to his central ideals of Republican power and oversight—and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • H.Doc. 108-224 Black Americans in Congress 1870-2007
    “The Negroes’ Temporary Farewell” JIM CROW AND THE EXCLUSION OF AFRICAN AMERICANS FROM CONGRESS, 1887–1929 On December 5, 1887, for the first time in almost two decades, Congress convened without an African-American Member. “All the men who stood up in awkward squads to be sworn in on Monday had white faces,” noted a correspondent for the Philadelphia Record of the Members who took the oath of office on the House Floor. “The negro is not only out of Congress, he is practically out of politics.”1 Though three black men served in the next Congress (51st, 1889–1891), the number of African Americans serving on Capitol Hill diminished significantly as the congressional focus on racial equality faded. Only five African Americans were elected to the House in the next decade: Henry Cheatham and George White of North Carolina, Thomas Miller and George Murray of South Carolina, and John M. Langston of Virginia. But despite their isolation, these men sought to represent the interests of all African Americans. Like their predecessors, they confronted violent and contested elections, difficulty procuring desirable committee assignments, and an inability to pass their legislative initiatives. Moreover, these black Members faced further impediments in the form of legalized segregation and disfranchisement, general disinterest in progressive racial legislation, and the increasing power of southern conservatives in Congress. John M. Langston took his seat in Congress after contesting the election results in his district. One of the first African Americans in the nation elected to public office, he was clerk of the Brownhelm (Ohio) Townshipn i 1855.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Concerns During the Age of Imperialism. Marshall E
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1995 The outhS and American Foreign Policy, 1894-1904: Regional Concerns During the Age of Imperialism. Marshall E. Schott Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Schott, Marshall E., "The outhS and American Foreign Policy, 1894-1904: Regional Concerns During the Age of Imperialism." (1995). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6134. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6134 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master.UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • ©2013 Luis-Alejandro Dinnella-Borrego ALL RIGHTS
    ©2013 Luis-Alejandro Dinnella-Borrego ALL RIGHTS RESERVED “THAT OUR GOVERNMENT MAY STAND”: AFRICAN AMERICAN POLITICS IN THE POSTBELLUM SOUTH, 1865-1901 By LUIS-ALEJANDRO DINNELLA-BORREGO A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History written under the direction of Mia Bay and Ann Fabian and approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION “That Our Government May Stand”: African American Politics in the Postbellum South, 1865-1913 by LUIS-ALEJANDRO DINNELLA-BORREGO Dissertation Director: Mia Bay and Ann Fabian This dissertation provides a fresh examination of black politics in the post-Civil War South by focusing on the careers of six black congressmen after the Civil War: John Mercer Langston of Virginia, James Thomas Rapier of Alabama, Robert Smalls of South Carolina, John Roy Lynch of Mississippi, Josiah Thomas Walls of Florida, and George Henry White of North Carolina. It examines the career trajectories, rhetoric, and policy agendas of these congressmen in order to determine how effectively they represented the wants and needs of the black electorate. The dissertation argues that black congressmen effectively represented and articulated the interests of their constituents. They did so by embracing a policy agenda favoring strong civil rights protections and encompassing a broad vision of economic modernization and expanded access for education. Furthermore, black congressmen embraced their role as national leaders and as spokesmen not only for their congressional districts and states, but for all African Americans throughout the South.
    [Show full text]
  • Camp Douglas News Committed to the Preservation of Chicago History
    Camp Douglas News Committed to the Preservation of Chicago History Camp Douglas Restoration Foundation Chicago, Illinois Winter 2012 Volume 3, Issue 4 Project Phases: Camp Douglas Restoration Foundation—Latest News Awareness and Support: place the artifacts within VIRTUAL CAMP 2010-2013 historic perspectives. DOUGLAS PROJECT CONTINUES Site Location and Site GRIFFIN FUNERAL HOME The students from IIT Planning: 2012 TO BE DEVELOPED presented their results Prologue, Inc. announced November 30 as part of plans to develop an Archaeological Investigation: the IPRO Day at IIT. alternate school, 2012-2013 They, along with 29 community center and Civil other IPRO teams, War museum on the site of Virtual Camp Douglas: 2013 were judged on a the former Griffin Funeral video, table top display Home, 3232 S. King Drive. and oral presentation Construction: 2013-14 The announcement was to a panel of judges. made by Dr. Nancy Jackson, Executive Director of Prologue which Preliminary views of the camp map, story operates alternate schools in Chicago providing boards and web site were impressive. Students educational opportunities to school drop-outs working on the story boards have conducted who are not eligible to reenter the public Civil War research into stories about camp life in schools. The Foundation has been in contact preparation for videos to be produced. Mapping with Dr. Jackson and is cooperating with them Bits & Pieces of Camp Douglas is nearly completed and the on the development of the museum. web site brings stories and mapping together. Ernest Griffin and his Next semester the project will continue at IIT Civil War Units family, after his death in 1995 under the leadership of Professor Laura Batson.
    [Show full text]
  • James Dufresne: They Met at Appomattox Court House
    November 2017 Vol XXXIII, No 3 Thurs Nov 9 James Dufresne: They Met at Appomattox Court House “From present indications, the retreat of the enemy is rapidly becoming a rout.” So wrote Philip H. Sheridan to Lt Gen Ulysses S. Grant on April 5, 1865, from Jetersville Depot, Virginia, three days after Lee’s army had abandoned the trenches of the fallen cities of Richmond and Petersburg and begun its flight west. From the start, Grant’s goal was not merely to pursue Lee’s army but to intercept it: to cut it off and prevent Lee from veering south and joining the Confederate army of Joseph Johnston in North Carolina. Grant wanted to bring this war to a conclusion, so he ordered his two top generals, Sheridan and Sherman, to keep Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia constantly on the move. Lee’s army was in dire straits with very little food and ammunition remaining. Lee had planned to resupply his army at various points along his march west; however, he had little to no success. Grant had sent Sheridan and his command ahead with orders to destroy any supplies or ammunition that Lee might be able to acquire on his route west. He was also to intercept Lee’s army on its route wherever the time and place would allow. Sheridan did get the opportunity to stop Lee and his army at a place called Appomattox Court House. Gen Grant had been corresponding with Gen Lee for a couple of days previously while both were on the march.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoosiers and the American Story Chapter 3
    3 Pioneers and Politics “At this time was the expression first used ‘Root pig, or die.’ We rooted and lived and father said if we could only make a little and lay it out in land while land was only $1.25 an acre we would be making money fast.” — Andrew TenBrook, 1889 The pioneers who settled in Indiana had to work England states. Southerners tended to settle mostly in hard to feed, house, and clothe their families. Every- southern Indiana; the Mid-Atlantic people in central thing had to be built and made from scratch. They Indiana; the New Englanders in the northern regions. had to do as the pioneer Andrew TenBrook describes There were exceptions. Some New Englanders did above, “Root pig, or die.” This phrase, a common one settle in southern Indiana, for example. during the pioneer period, means one must work hard Pioneers filled up Indiana from south to north or suffer the consequences, and in the Indiana wilder- like a glass of water fills from bottom to top. The ness those consequences could be hunger. Luckily, the southerners came first, making homes along the frontier was a place of abundance, the land was rich, Ohio, Whitewater, and Wabash Rivers. By the 1820s the forests and rivers bountiful, and the pioneers people were moving to central Indiana, by the 1830s to knew how to gather nuts, plants, and fruits from the northern regions. The presence of Indians in the north forest; sow and reap crops; and profit when there and more difficult access delayed settlement there.
    [Show full text]
  • HARDTACK Indianapolis Civil War Round Table Newsletter
    1 HARDTACK Indianapolis Civil War Round Table Newsletter http://indianapoliscwrt.org/ October 8, 2012 at 7:30 p.m. Meeting at Indiana History Center Auditorium 450 West Ohio Street The Plan of the Day “An Irrepressible Conflict”: Civil War Rioting in Cincinnati, 1862 Cincinnati in 1862, lithograph in Harper’s Weekly In July of 1862, Irish workers in Cincinnati rioted to keep black workers from laboring on the docks, and attempted to “clean out” African American residential sections of the city. A precursor to the more infamous New York draft riots of 1863, the violence was triggered by the prospect of a draft and the rumored arming of black soldiers. Fearing that their jobs would be threatened by emancipation and an influx of black workers, immigrant laborers tried to establish themselves as true citizens and African Americans as interlopers. During the Civil War, as at other times in the nation’s history, black men staked their claims to citizenship on their loyal labor and their armed service—not just in federal armies, but in defense of their homes and livelihoods. When black workers organized in self-defense, white Cincinnatians quickly formed militia units in response. This wartime rioting followed patterns of antebellum riots, but the emancipation of African Americans and their military service during the war created a clear turning point in black demands for social citizenship. JOIN US BEFORE THE MEETING AT SHAPIRO’S DELI! All ICWRT members and guests are invited to join us at 5:30 P.M. at Shapiro’s Delicatessen, 808 S. Meridian St. (just south of McCarty Street) before the meeting to enjoy dinner and fellowship.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of STATUES in the NATIONAL STATUARY HALL COLLECTION As of April 2017
    history, art & archives | u. s. house of representatives LIST OF STATUES IN THE NATIONAL STATUARY HALL COLLECTION as of April 2017 STATE STATUE SCULPTOR Alabama Helen Keller Edward Hlavka Alabama Joseph Wheeler Berthold Nebel Alaska Edward Lewis “Bob” Bartlett Felix de Weldon Alaska Ernest Gruening George Anthonisen Arizona Barry Goldwater Deborah Copenhaver Fellows Arizona Eusebio F. Kino Suzanne Silvercruys Arkansas James Paul Clarke Pompeo Coppini Arkansas Uriah M. Rose Frederic Ruckstull California Ronald Wilson Reagan Chas Fagan California Junipero Serra Ettore Cadorin Colorado Florence Sabin Joy Buba Colorado John “Jack” Swigert George and Mark Lundeen Connecticut Roger Sherman Chauncey Ives Connecticut Jonathan Trumbull Chauncey Ives Delaware John Clayton Bryant Baker Delaware Caesar Rodney Bryant Baker Florida John Gorrie Charles A. Pillars Florida Edmund Kirby Smith Charles A. Pillars Georgia Crawford Long J. Massey Rhind Georgia Alexander H. Stephens Gutzon Borglum Hawaii Father Damien Marisol Escobar Hawaii Kamehameha I C. P. Curtis and Ortho Fairbanks, after Thomas Gould Idaho William Borah Bryant Baker Idaho George Shoup Frederick Triebel Illinois James Shields Leonard Volk Illinois Frances Willard Helen Mears Indiana Oliver Hazard Morton Charles Niehaus Indiana Lewis Wallace Andrew O’Connor Iowa Norman E. Borlaug Benjamin Victor Iowa Samuel Jordan Kirkwood Vinnie Ream Kansas Dwight D. Eisenhower Jim Brothers Kansas John James Ingalls Charles Niehaus Kentucky Henry Clay Charles Niehaus Kentucky Ephraim McDowell Charles Niehaus
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Butternut Trees
    Purdue University Purdue extension FNR-421-W & Natural Re ry sou Forestry and Natural Resources st rc re e o s F Conservation and Management of Butternut Trees Lenny Farlee1,3, Keith Woeste1, Michael Ostry2, James McKenna1 and Sally Weeks3 1 USDA Forest Service Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center, Purdue University, 715 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907 PURDUE UNIVERSITY 2 USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, 1561 Lindig Ave. St. Paul, MN 55108 3 Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, 715 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907 Introduction Butternut (Juglans cinerea), also known as white wal- nut, is a native hardwood related to black walnut (Juglans nigra) and other members of the walnut family. Butternut is a medium-sized tree with alternate, pinnately com- pound leaves, that bears large, sharply ridged, cylindrical nuts inside sticky green hulls that earned it the nickname lemon-nut (Rink, 1990). The nuts, a preferred food of squirrels and other wildlife, were collected and eaten by Native Americans (Waugh, 1916; Hamel and Chiltoskey, 1975) and early settlers, who also valued butternut for its workable, medium brown-colored heartwood (Kel- logg, 1919), and as a source of medicine (Johnson, 1884; Lawrence, 1998), dyes (Hamel and Chiltoskey, 1975), and sap sugar. Butternut’s native range extends over the entire north- eastern quarter of the United States, including many states immediately west of the Mississippi River. Butter- nut is more cold-tolerant than black walnut, and it grows as far north as the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, New Brunswick, southern Quebec, and Ontario (Fig.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment for Butternut Or White Walnut (Juglans Cinerea) L. USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region
    Conservation Assessment for Butternut or White walnut (Juglans cinerea) L. USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region 2003 Jan Schultz Hiawatha National Forest Forest Plant Ecologist (906) 228-8491 This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on Juglans cinerea L. (butternut). This is an administrative review of existing information only and does not represent a management decision or direction by the U. S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was gathered and reported in preparation of this document, then subsequently reviewed by subject experts, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if the reader has information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. Conservation Assessment for Butternut or White walnut (Juglans cinerea) L. 2 Table Of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION / OBJECTIVES.......................................................................7 BIOLOGICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION..............................8 Species Description and Life History..........................................................................................8 SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS...........................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Platform Was Drafted After Soliciting Testimony from a Geographically Diverse Range of Hoosiers at Hearings in South Bend, New Albany and Indianapolis
    Preamble We've come a long way in a short time. With a focus and a commitment to serve Hoosier taxpayers, and not special interests, Indiana's Party of Purpose has enacted improvements that have made government smaller and more efficient, improved our state's economy, and ensured Indiana's Comeback continues to move full steam ahead. After years of government spending and debt, Republican leadership balanced the budget without raising taxes. At the same time, services have improved across the state. A leaner state government has actually improved quality. Our Bureau of Motor Vehicles is now a model for efficiency, moving customers through in 10 minutes or less. Major Moves has improved infrastructure by providing a decade worth of funding for projects around the state that had been promised and delayed for decades. Property taxes in Indiana are among the lowest in the nation, having been cut by 30 percent and capped permanently by the voters and by our State Constitution. Along the way, we have lived by a number of simple principles, but atop that list is the fact that Hoosiers know what's best for Hoosiers. We don't ask for, or want, the federal government to interfere with or dictate how we should live our lives. The improvements we have made, together, have come from within, from Hoosiers. We owe a debt of gratitude to Governor Mitch Daniels and Lieutenant Governor Becky Skillman , our dynamic Hoosier duo, who have worked and led to make Indiana a better place to live, work and invest, alongside House Speaker Brian Bosma , Senate President Pro Tempore David Long and our majorities in the House and Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Warren Fairbanks (1852–1918)
    Charles Warren Fairbanks (1852–1918) A prosperous Indianapolis attorney who eoclassical sculptor Franklin Simmons specialized in was active in the Republican Party, depicting Americans and American history, though he Charles Warren Fairbanks served as both a U.S. senator from Indiana and 26th vice spent most of his career in Rome. Born and raised in president of the United States. Born in Maine, Simmons briefly studied under John Adams Union County, Ohio, Fairbanks was a Jackson in Boston. For two years in the mid-1860s, the keynote speaker at the 1896 Republican sculptor lived in Washington, D.C., and modeled Civil War officers National Convention that nominated N William McKinley for president. In that Ulysses S. Grant, William T. Sherman, and David G. Farragut. Soon after- same year, Fairbanks was elected to the ward, Simmons moved to Rome, where, like others of his generation, U.S. Senate, where he served from 1897 to 1905, chairing the Committee on Immi- he was attracted by the availability of materials and assistants and by gration and the Committee on Public the creative environment. Buildings and Grounds. Charles Fairbanks was vice president-elect in 1905 when he sat A leading conservative, Fairbanks was nominated for the vice presidency on the for the bust intermittently during visits to Washington. The sculptor, who 1904 ticket with Theodore Roosevelt. Upon had previously created busts of Vice Presidents Hannibal Hamlin (p. 180) election, Fairbanks resigned from the and Adlai E. Stevenson (p. 344) for the U.S. Capitol, apparently believed Senate. Although he was a favorite son candidate for the Republican nomination that his proposal for a likeness of Fairbanks had been officially accepted.
    [Show full text]