DOCSLIB.ORG

©2013 Luis-Alejandro Dinnella-Borrego ALL RIGHTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
©2013 Luis-Alejandro Dinnella-Borrego ALL RIGHTS ©2013 Luis-Alejandro Dinnella-Borrego ALL RIGHTS RESERVED “THAT OUR GOVERNMENT MAY STAND”: AFRICAN AMERICAN POLITICS IN THE POSTBELLUM SOUTH, 1865-1901 By LUIS-ALEJANDRO DINNELLA-BORREGO A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History written under the direction of Mia Bay and Ann Fabian and approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION “That Our Government May Stand”: African American Politics in the Postbellum South, 1865-1913 by LUIS-ALEJANDRO DINNELLA-BORREGO Dissertation Director: Mia Bay and Ann Fabian This dissertation provides a fresh examination of black politics in the post-Civil War South by focusing on the careers of six black congressmen after the Civil War: John Mercer Langston of Virginia, James Thomas Rapier of Alabama, Robert Smalls of South Carolina, John Roy Lynch of Mississippi, Josiah Thomas Walls of Florida, and George Henry White of North Carolina. It examines the career trajectories, rhetoric, and policy agendas of these congressmen in order to determine how effectively they represented the wants and needs of the black electorate. The dissertation argues that black congressmen effectively represented and articulated the interests of their constituents. They did so by embracing a policy agenda favoring strong civil rights protections and encompassing a broad vision of economic modernization and expanded access for education. Furthermore, black congressmen embraced their role as national leaders and as spokesmen not only for their congressional districts and states, but for all African Americans throughout the South. Black political leaders during the postwar Reconstruction years placed particular importance on the significance of black military service during the war and the lasting legacy of emancipation for the newly freed population. Local developments, especially antiblack violence and tumultuous electoral contests, conditioned newly elected black ii congressmen and shaped the policies that they embraced, whether it was expanded educational opportunities, stronger federal protections for civil rights, or the tactical decision to support amnesty for ex-Confederates. Despite political pressures and frequent intimidation, black congressmen performed their work admirably, particularly during debates over Charles Sumner’s Civil Rights Act of 1875. As Reconstruction gave way to Redemption, a fracturing took place within the black political establishment as black leaders and their constituents searched for effective ways to respond to white supremacy, disfranchisement, segregation, and lynching. The two most viable avenues available to them, fusion voting and emigration, were both applied in various settings but were ultimately unable to stave off the loss of black citizenship rights by the century’s end. Nevertheless, black congressmen challenged the barriers of prejudice, paving the way for future black struggles for equality in the twentieth century. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have accumulated many debts during this project, and I appreciate the chance to repay some of them here. To begin, I deeply appreciate my teachers and advisors at Dartmouth College, Sheila Culbert (now at the Loomis Chafee School), Richard Wright, Annelise Orleck, Craig Steven Wilder (now at MIT), Edward G. Miller, David Lagomarsino, Walter Simons, Lennart K. Sundelin, Tanalís Padilla, and Marysa Navarro. I must also thank Robert Bonner for first introducing me to the work of Steven Hahn during a conversation at his office at Dartmouth. My teachers in the Theater Department—Amy S. Holzapfel (now at Williams College), Laura D. Edmondson, Annabelle Winograd, James Rice, Ford Evans, Jamie Horton, Peter Hackett, and Mara Sabinson—were invaluable in introducing me to formal academic study and in guiding me through my time as an undergraduate. My growth as a historian accelerated during my time at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. I would like to thank my advisor at Virginia, Michael F. Holt, and my teachers at the Corcoran Department of History, Peter Onuf, Gary Gallagher, Olivier Zunz, and Mark Thomas. I have continued to develop my skills as a historian thanks to the tutelage that I have received at Rutgers. My teachers at the Department of History at Rutgers University, Seth Koven, Paul Clemens, Peter Silver, Virginia Yans, Donna Murch, David Foglesong, Minkah Makalani (now at the University of Texas at Austin), Jennifer Mittlestadt, and Deborah Gray White, were all inspiring and taught me the fundamentals of the craft. My doctoral advisors, Ann Fabian and Mia Bay, read drafts with patience. I also wish to thank my other committee members: David Greenberg, Jackson Lears, and Eric Foner of Columbia University. The department’s staff, especially iv departmental secretary Dawn Ruskai, helped to make my stay at Rutgers enjoyable and incredibly productive. Various institutions were subjected to innumerable e-mail queries from me and responded with considerable material. Among those who suffered through my numerous requests patiently and greatly contributed to this work are Colleen W. Seale, librarian at the George A. Smathers Libraries, University of Florida, Gainesville; R. Boyd Murphree, Ph.D., Archivist at the Florida State Archives, Tallahassee, Florida; Matthew Taylor and Christa Snow, librarians, and Patricia A. Morrison in Special Collections at the Jacksonville Public Library, Jacksonville, Florida; Steven D. Tuttle, Director, Archives Services, South Carolina Department of Archives and History, Charleston; Cheryl Thomas, Collections Project Manager and Subject Liaison for Philosophy at Perkins Research Services at the Perkins/Bostock Library at Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Harry Fulmer, Curator of Manuscripts, and Dr. Fritz Hame, at the University of South Carolina’s South Caroliniana Library in Columbia; Beth Madison Howse, Special Collections Library, John Hope and Aurelia E. Franklin Library, Fisk University, Nashville, Tennessee; and Trent Hanner, Reference Librarian at the Tennessee State Library and Archives, Nashville. At the Mississippi Department of Archives and History in Jackson, I thank Anne L. Webster (Director of Library Services), Grady Howell, Amanda Lyons, and Clinton Bagley. Anne pulled out all the stops and dug up lots of material to help me learn more about Klan violence in Mississippi. Clinton’s welcome humor was much appreciated, and he also suggested that I visit Natchez, where I could see the house in which John Roy Lynch grew up and the church where Hiram Revels preached. I could even eat behind v Lynch’s house, which Bagley said was actually a stable back in the day. Even though he will probably think that I am an ingrate because I never made it to Natchez, I benefited from many of Clinton’s valuable suggestions. I also thank Rickie Brunner, Norwood Kerr, Nancy Dupree, Graydon Rust, and Graham Neeley, all at the Alabama Department of Archives and History in Montgomery, and Sara Brewer and Arlene Royer, at the National Archives and Records Administration—Southeast Region at Morrow, Georgia, for helping me navigate through early 1870s district court records. At the State Records Center at Raleigh, North Carolina, I wish to thank Lauren Hensey, Victoria Montgomery, and especially Michael Denning. At the State Archives of North Carolina, also in Raleigh, I thank Alison M. Thurman, Michael Hill, Dennis F. Daniels, and especially LeRae Sikes Umfleet, who generously gave me a copy of the full draft of her 2005 report on the Wilmington Riot of 1898. This report contained generous transcriptions of valuable primary sources and enabled me to gain a deeper understanding of the riot and its causes than I otherwise would have had. She and Mike Hill also allowed me access to the three years’ worth of notes, research, and photocopies that she accumulated in the process of writing her report on the violence in Wilmington. Bill Bynum at the Library of Virginia in Richmond and Frances S. Pollard, Chief Librarian, and Amber Jones of the Virginia Historical Society (also in Richmond) provided excellent assistance to my searches for materials. My research required repeated trips to Washington, D.C. and to New York City. The librarians at the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture at the New York Public Library were incredibly helpful. I also want to thank the librarians at the Manuscripts Division and at the Newspapers and Current Periodicals Reading Room of vi the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. At Howard University, I greatly appreciated help from Dr. Ida E. Jones and Joellen ElBashir of the Manuscript Division of the Moorland-Spingarn Research Center. Finally, Tab Lewis at Archives II in College Park, Maryland suffered through what must have seemed to be mind-numbingly vague citations for Treasury Department records. I owe a major debt to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), especially Archivist of the United States David S. Ferriero (who listened and asked provocative questions at the brown-bag lunch where I presented my findings). At the NARA Center for Legislative Archives, Richard McCulley, Richard Hunt, Christine Blackerby, and Allison Noyes put up with me as an undergraduate intern and provided insightful opportunities and bits of information
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How North Carolina's Black Politicians and Press Narrated and Influenced the Tu
    D. SHARPLEY 1 /133 Black Discourses in North Carolina, 1890-1902: How North Carolina’s Black Politicians and Press Narrated and Influenced the Tumultuous Era of Fusion Politics By Dannette Sharpley A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors Department of History, Duke University Under the advisement of Dr. Nancy MacLean April 13, 2018 D. SHARPLEY 2 /133 Acknowledgements I am very grateful to have had the opportunity to write an Honors Thesis in the History Department. When I returned to school after many years of separation, I was prepared for challenging work. I expected to be pushed intellectually and emotionally. I expected to struggle through all-nighters, moments of self-doubt, and even academic setbacks. I did not, however, imagine that I could feel so passionate or excited about what I learned in class. I didn’t expect to even undertake such a large project, let alone arrive at the finish line. And I didn’t imagine the sense of accomplishment at having completed something that I feel is meaningful beyond my own individual education. The process of writing this thesis has been all those things and more. I would first like to thank everyone at the History Department who supports this Honors Distinction program, because this amazing process would not be possible without your work. Thank you very much to Dr. Nancy MacLean for advising me on this project. It was in Professor MacLean’s History of Modern Social Movements class that I became obsessed with North Carolina’s role in the Populist movement of the nineteenth, thus beginning this journey.
    [Show full text]
  • (Extra)ORDINARY MEN
    (Extra)ORDINARY MEN: African-American Lawyers and Civil Rights in Arkansas Before 1950 Judith Kilpatrick* “The remarkable thing is not that black men attempted to regain their stolen civic rights, but that they tried over and over again, using a wide va- riety of techniques.”1 I. INTRODUCTION Arkansas has a tradition, beginning in 1865, of African- American attorneys who were active in civil rights. During the eighty years following the Emancipation Proclamation, at least sixty-nine African-American men were admitted to practice law in the state.2 They were all men of their times, frequently hold- * Associate Professor, University of Arkansas School of Law; J.S.D. 1999, LL.M. 1992, Columbia University, J.D. 1975, B.A. 1972, University of California-Berkeley. The author would like to thank the following: the historians whose work is cited here; em- ployees of The Arkansas History Commission, The Butler Center of the Little Rock Public Library, the Pine Bluff Public Library and the Helena Public Library for patience and help in locating additional resources; Patricia Cline Cohen, Professor of American History at the University of California, Santa Barbara, for reviewing the draft and providing comments; and Jon Porter (UA 1999) and Mickie Tucker (UA 2001) for their excellent research assis- tance. Much appreciation for summer research grants from the University of Arkansas School of Law in 1998 and 1999. Special thanks to Elizabeth Motherwell, of the Universi- ty of Arkansas Press, for starting me in this research direction. No claim is made as to the completeness of this record. Gaps exist and the author would appreciated receiving any information that might help to fill them.
    [Show full text]
  • FOCUS E-News May 28 - June 3, 2017
    FOCUS E-News May 28 - June 3, 2017 Please support FutureChuch during our Pentecost Campaign! FutureChurch and Voice of the Faithful Call on U.S. Bishops to Publicly Support Women Deacons In a statement released today, FutureChurch and Voice of the Faithful call on U.S. Bishops to publicly support women deacons. As Pope Francis’s commission studying the possibility of restoring women deacons continues its work, FutureChurch and Voice of the Faithful (VOTF) urge U.S. Catholic Bishops to publicly support the restoration of the ancient practice of ordaining women deacons and to petition the Holy See to allow women to function in our Church as permanent deacons. Women have traditionally carried out 80 to 85% of the lay ministry of our Church*, yet they do not have equal access to all positions within the Church or an equal voice in decision-making processes. Since the restoration of the permanent diaconate following the Second Vatican Council, male candidates have been chosen largely from among those who already perform diaconal service. Women who likewise are leaders in such ministries should not be deprived of the graces of the sacrament. Further, the declining number of priests and the increasing burden of providing adequate ministry to our people make ordaining women to the diaconate an obvious option for addressing that issue. Read more Learn more Catholicwomendeacons.org New resources to open discussion with your priest, deacon or bishop! soon! DeaconChat Deacon Chat: Resources for starting a conversation about women deacons On May 12, 2016 Pope Francis -- responding to a question posed by members of the International Union of Superiors General (UISG) -- said that he would establish a commission to study the question of ordaining women deacons in the Roman Catholic Church.
    [Show full text]
  • A FRIGHTFUL VENGEANCE: LYNCHING and CAPITAL PUNISHMENT in TURN-OF-THE-CENTURY COLORADO By
    A FRIGHTFUL VENGEANCE: LYNCHING AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN TURN-OF-THE-CENTURY COLORADO by JEFFREY A. WERMER B.A., Reed College, 2006 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History 2014 This thesis entitled: A Frightful Vengeance: Lynching and Capital Punishment in Turn-of-the-Century Colorado written by Jeffrey A. Wermer has been approved for the Department of History Dr. Thomas Andrews, Committee Chair Dr. Fred Anderson, Committee Member Dr. Paul Sutter, Committee Member Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. iii Wermer, Jeffrey A. (M.A., History) A Frightful Vengeance: Lynching and Capital Punishment in Turn-of-the-Century Colorado Thesis directed by Associate Professor Thomas Andrews Having abolished the death penalty four years prior, Coloradoans lynched three men—Thomas Reynolds, Calvin Kimblern, and John Preston Porter, Jr.— in 1900, hanging two and burning one at the stake. This thesis argues that these lynchings both represented and supported Colorado’s culture of lynching, a combination of social and cultural connections in which lynching was used as a force for social cohesion and control. Rather than being a distinct frontier culture of lynching, Colorado’s culture was a slightly attenuated version of the racially-motivated culture of lynching in the Jim Crow South. The three lynchings in 1900 lay at the heart of the political debate over the reinstatement of capital punishment in 1901.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2020 Voice of the Faithful 2020 Conference Will Be a Virtual Gathering Offering Visions of a Just Church for All the Faithful
    Voice Matters Keep the Faith, Change the Church © 2020 Voice of the Faithful Voice of the Faithful® newsletter for members worldwide Fall 2020 Voice of the Faithful 2020 Conference will be a virtual gathering Offering visions of a just Church for all the faithful he worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has affected TVoice of the Faithful similarly to other organizations planning events during 2020. Out of an abundance of caution and concern for the well-being of our mem- bers and supporters, Voice of the Faithful will present an online Zoom conference for 2020. VOTF Conference: Visions of a Just Church will take place Oct. 3. Confer- ence registrants can expect the same mix of interesting speakers and evocative conversation as always, albeit virtually. Together, we will seek visions of a just Church for all the faithful. the Diaconate, which convened in Rome November 2016. Zagano presently is senior research associate-in-residence Two well-know Catholic scholars are scheduled to speak, and adjunct professor of reli- and VOTF leaders are scheduled to present updates gion at Hofstra University. on initiatives and programs in child Fr. Richard Lennan is pro- protection, financial fessor of systematic theology accountability and and Professor Ordinarius in transparency, and the School of Theology and women’s roles in the Ministry at Boston College. Church. Lennan spoke at last year’s conference and, continuing Phyllis Zagano, on the themes he discussed Ph.D., is an interna- then, he will talk about the tionally recognized draft document on Austra- scholar in Catholic lia’s future Church gover- studies and women’s nance and the potential for a more lay-participatory Church.
    [Show full text]
  • H.Doc. 108-224 Black Americans in Congress 1870-2007
    “The Negroes’ Temporary Farewell” JIM CROW AND THE EXCLUSION OF AFRICAN AMERICANS FROM CONGRESS, 1887–1929 On December 5, 1887, for the first time in almost two decades, Congress convened without an African-American Member. “All the men who stood up in awkward squads to be sworn in on Monday had white faces,” noted a correspondent for the Philadelphia Record of the Members who took the oath of office on the House Floor. “The negro is not only out of Congress, he is practically out of politics.”1 Though three black men served in the next Congress (51st, 1889–1891), the number of African Americans serving on Capitol Hill diminished significantly as the congressional focus on racial equality faded. Only five African Americans were elected to the House in the next decade: Henry Cheatham and George White of North Carolina, Thomas Miller and George Murray of South Carolina, and John M. Langston of Virginia. But despite their isolation, these men sought to represent the interests of all African Americans. Like their predecessors, they confronted violent and contested elections, difficulty procuring desirable committee assignments, and an inability to pass their legislative initiatives. Moreover, these black Members faced further impediments in the form of legalized segregation and disfranchisement, general disinterest in progressive racial legislation, and the increasing power of southern conservatives in Congress. John M. Langston took his seat in Congress after contesting the election results in his district. One of the first African Americans in the nation elected to public office, he was clerk of the Brownhelm (Ohio) Townshipn i 1855.
    [Show full text]
  • Heroes of the Colored Race by Terry Ann Wildman Grade Level
    Lesson Plan #2 for the Genius of Freedom: Heroes of the Colored Race by Terry Ann Wildman Grade Level: Upper elementary or middle school Topics: African American leaders Pennsylvania History Standards: 8.1.6 B, 8.2.9 A, 8.3.9 A Pennsylvania Core Standards: 8.5.6-8 A African American History, Prentice Hall textbook: N/A Overview: What is a hero? What defines a hero in one’s culture may be different throughout time and place. Getting our students to think about what constitutes a hero yesterday and today is the focus of this lesson. In the lithograph Heroes of the Colored Race there are three main figures and eight smaller ones. Students will explore who these figures are, why they were placed on the picture in this way, and the background images of life in America in the 1800s. Students will brainstorm and choose heroes of the African American people today and design a similar poster. Materials: Heroes of the Colored Race, Philadelphia, 1881. Biography cards of the 11 figures in the image (attached, to be printed out double-sided) Smartboard, whiteboard, or blackboard Computer access for students Poster board Chart Paper Markers Colored pencils Procedure: 1. Introduce the lesson with images of modern superheroes. Ask students to discuss why these figures are heroes. Decide on a working definition of a hero. Note these qualities on chart paper and display throughout the lesson. 2. Present the image Heroes of the Colored Race on the board. Ask what historic figures students recognize and begin to list those on the board.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Concerns During the Age of Imperialism. Marshall E
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1995 The outhS and American Foreign Policy, 1894-1904: Regional Concerns During the Age of Imperialism. Marshall E. Schott Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Schott, Marshall E., "The outhS and American Foreign Policy, 1894-1904: Regional Concerns During the Age of Imperialism." (1995). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6134. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6134 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master.UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Rochester's Frederick Douglass, Part
    ROCHESTER HISTORY Vol. LXVII Fall, 2005 No. 4 Rochester's Frederick Douglass Part Two by Victoria Sandwick Schmitt Underground Railroad From History of New York State, edited by Alexander C. Flick. Volume 7. New York: Columbia University Press, 1935 Courtesy of the Rochester Museum & Science Center, Rochester, NY 1 Front page from Douglass’ Monthly, Courtesy of the Rochester Museum & Science Center, Rochester, NY ROCHESTER HISTORY, published by the Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County. Address correspondence to Local History and Genealogy Division, Rochester Public Library, 115 South Avenue, Rochester, NY 14604. Subscriptions to Rochester History are $8.00 per year by mail. Foreign subscriptions are $12.00 per year, $4.00 per copy for individual issues. Rochester History is funded in part by the Frances Kenyon Publication Fund, established in memory of her sister, Florence Taber Kenyon and her friend Thelma Jeffries. CONOLLY PRINTING-2 c CITY OF ROCHESTER 2007 2 2 Douglass Sheltered Freedom Seekers The Douglass family only lived on Alexander Street for four years before relocating in 1852 to a hillside farm south of the city on what is now South Avenue. Douglass’ farm stood on the outskirts of town, amongst sparsely settled hills not far from the Genesee River. The Douglasses did not sell their Alexander Street house. They held it as the first of several real estate investments, which were the foundation of financial security for them as for many enterprising African American families. 71 The Douglasses’ second residence consisted of a farm with a framed dwelling, orchard and barn. In 2005, a marker in front of School 12 on South Avenue locates the site, near Highland Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadable Complete Magazine
    Virginia LawyerVOL. 68/NO. 3 • October 2019 VIRGINIA LAWYER REGISTER The Official Publication of the Virginia State Bar The Real Property Issue: Your Practice and Real Estate Transactions Liens That Survive Bankruptcy Common Interest Communities Transfer on Death Deeds Plus, Gifts for Lawyers Virginia Lawyer The Official Publication of the Virginia State Bar October 2019 Volume 68/Number 3 Features Noteworthy REAL PROPERTY VSB NEWS 17 Get Real: The Real Property Issue 36 2019 Diversity Forum Attracts by Ronald D. Wiley Jr. Capacity Crowd 18 No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: Your Practice and Real Estate Transactions by Kay M. Creasman and Paul H. Melnick 22 Liens That Survive Bankruptcy: Is There a Better Way to Get That Message to Debtor Clients? by F. Lewis Biggs 37 The Honorable Teresa M. Chafin Invested to the Supreme Court of 24 A Review of Selected Virginia Laws and Virginia Regulations Pertaining to Common Interest 37 Virginia Law Foundation Communities and Community Managers Announces 2019 Grant Recipients by Susan Bradford Tarley 38 University of Richmond Law 26 Transfer on Death Deeds Student Wins IP Writing by Kay M. Creasman Competition 40 In Memoriam 30 Six Important Developments for Conservation Easements by Timothy Lindstrom 44 Conference of Local and Specialty Bar Associations ET AL. 42 Gifts for Lawyers Access to Legal Services 55 Listening to the Law 34 Herb Sebren of Tappahannock to Receive 2019 Powell Pro Bono Award 35 Kelly Guzzo and Consumer Litigation Associates Honored for Departments Pro Bono Work 6 Forum 51 CLE Calendar VIRGINIA LAWYER REGISTER 59 Professional Notices 56 Disciplinary Summaries 58 Virginia Lawyers: If You Need 61 Classified Ads 61 Advertiser’s Index 57 Disciplinary Proceedings Business, We Need You! 58 The Honorable Teresa M.
    [Show full text]
  • And He Was No Soft-Tongued Apologist: Fredrick Douglass As a Constitutional Theorist 1865-1895
    Providence College DigitalCommons@Providence Theology Faculty Publications Theology 10-1988 And He Was No Soft-Tongued Apologist: Fredrick Douglass as a Constitutional Theorist 1865-1895 Gabriel Pivarnik Providence College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/theology_fac Part of the Religion Commons, and the United States History Commons Pivarnik, Gabriel, "And He Was No Soft-Tongued Apologist: Fredrick Douglass as a Constitutional Theorist 1865-1895" (1988). Theology Faculty Publications. 5. https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/theology_fac/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Theology at DigitalCommons@Providence. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Providence. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AND HE WAS NO SOFT-TONGUED APOLOGIST: FREDERICK DOUGLASS AS A CONSTITUTIONAL THEORIST, 1865-1895 A Paper Presented to the National Endowment for the Humanities for the Younger Scholars Grant Program 1988 by Robert George Pivarnik October, 1988 And he was no soft-tongued apologist; He spoke straightforward, fearlessly uncowed The sunlight of his truth dispelled the mist, And set in bold relief each dark-hued cloud; To sin and crime he gave their proper hue, And hurled at evil what was evil's due. Paul Lawrence Dunbar, "Frederick Douglass" Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge the work of Waldo E. Martin on the psychology of Frederick Douglass. If it were not for Martin's research, this project would never have gotten underway. I would also like to thank Elizabeth Ackert and the staff of the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Research Library who were instrumen­ tal in helping me obtain the necessary resources for this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays on the Persecution of Religious Minorities by David Thomas Smith
    Essays on the Persecution of Religious Minorities by David Thomas Smith A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) in the University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor William R. Clark, co-chair Professor Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, co-chair Professor Robert J. Franzese, Jr. Professor Andrei S. Markovits Professor Robert W. Mickey i Acknowledgements Throughout the last six and a half years I have benefited enormously from the mentorship and friendship of my wonderful dissertation committee members: Bill Clark, Anna Grzymala-Busse, Andy Markovits, Rob Mickey and Rob Franzese. I assembled this committee before I even knew what I wanted to write about, and I made the right choices—I cannot imagine a more supportive, patient and insightful group of advisers. They gave me badly-needed discipline when I needed it (which was all the time) and oversaw numerous episodes of Schumpeterian “creative destruction.” They also gave me more ideas than I could ever hope to assimilate, ideas which will be providing me with directions for future research for many years to come. But these huge contributions are minor in comparison to the fact that they taught me how to think like a political scientist. I couldn’t ask for anything more. All of these papers had trial runs in various internal workshops and seminars at the University of Michigan, and I profited greatly from the structured feedback that I received from the Michigan political science community, faculty and grad students alike. Thanks to everyone who was a discussant for one of these papers—Zvi Gitelman, Chuck Shipan, Sana Jaffrey, Cassie Grafstrom (twice!), Ron Inglehart, Ken Kollman, Allison Dale, Pam Brandwein, Andrea Jones-Rooy, Rob Salmond and Jenna Bednar.
    [Show full text]