JEPHSON ROYAL JOURNALISM 2019-2020.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

JEPHSON ROYAL JOURNALISM 2019-2020.Pdf PROLOGUE: Then and Now ....................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 1: Who Owns Diana? Delusion and Control ........................................................ 14 SECTION 2: Velvet and Steel: The Diana Touch ................................................................... 43 SECTION 3: Your Majesty ........................................................................................................ 69 SECTION 4: Your Next Majesties ............................................................................................ 86 SECTION 5: Ich Dien ............................................................................................................... 139 SECTION 6: Your Royal Highnesses ..................................................................................... 150 Please note, all articles were commissioned by the titles shown; some were abridged for length, though not for content; a (very) few were spiked before publication. [Cover Photo: Tim Ockenden, Press Association] Page | 2 Patrick is a consultant, journalist, broadcaster and new york times and london sunday times bestselling author, based in Washington DC. His byline has appeared in every major UK newspaper and international titles as varied as People magazine, Paris Match, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and the National Catholic Reporter. He is a published authority on corporate and personal branding, addressing conference audiences worldwide as well as events at the US State Department, the American University and the Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. He also writes, presents and advises on factual and drama programs, appearing on every major US network as well as British and international platforms. Patrick owes much of his practical communications experience to Princess Diana, who chose him to be her equerry and only private secretary/chief of staff. He served the Princess for eight years, responsible for every aspect of her public life, charitable initiatives, and private organization. He travelled with her to five continents, working with government officials up to head of state. Under relentless media scrutiny, his tenure covered the period of Princess Diana’s greatest popularity as well as the constitutional controversy of her separation from Prince Charles. In recognition of his service, HM Queen Elizabeth II appointed him a Lieutenant of the Royal Victorian Order. Patrick was born and raised in Ireland and holds a Masters degree in Political Science from Cambridge University. As an officer in the British Navy he served all over the world before being selected for royal duty. A naturalized US citizen based in Washington DC, he is founding partner in the specialist communications consultancy JephsonBeaman LLC (WWW.JEPHSONBEAMAN.COM). Page | 3 2001: In a tabloid sting operation in a london hotel, a daughter-in- law to the queen has been exposed using her royal links to leverage a business deal; in an ill-judged attempt to distract the media, a palace press officer inadvertently ignites a blaze of unfounded speculation about the couples’ sexuality… Page | 4 Patrick Jephson, who was a courtier for eight years, urges the Royal Family to ignore their unscrupulous media manipulators and to begin real reform before it’s too late At about this stage in a royal crisis, the internal press briefings start to become easier. The winces are outnumbered by the sighs of relief. A few tentative, self-congratulatory thoughts are permitted. The ship of monarchy has ridden out another storm in a tea cup. Supporters of the royal status quo, which is still most of us, will be tempted to share the relief. What a lot of fuss about nothing… Except that this time the sheer disproportion of the countess’s offence and the political reaction sounds an ominous warning that royal advisors will surely not want to ignore as they put away the Wessex file. A Westminster-style register of interests, which has been proposed by Labour MPs, is perhaps the most damaging piece of the fallout from the Dorchester incident. Ostensibly reasonable, it’s hard to reject with any conviction and it appeals to the resentful serf element that has been such a vocal part of the recent media feeding frenzy. It’s the most damaging because it will give us the right to pry into things that many of us feel are none of our business. We will pry anyway, of course, but it still won’t feel right. And it will only add legitimate outrage to the mixture of anger and despair that we must assume is being felt by the inhabitants of the various royal residences (yes, they have feelings too). It won’t even offer much protection against future such… um… misjudgements by the “minor royals”. Nor will the investigation by the lord chamberlain, which we’re assured will provide guidelines for any of them who feel the need to dabble in commerce. As it happens, such guidelines – or a version of them – already exist. A slim volume is available to the small number of officials who advise senior royalty, presumably the product of previous embarrassments such as the excruciating attempt by the Duke and Duchess of Windsor to sell tat on American television. Which reminds us that this is not a new problem. As I recall, the advice is hardly delphic, amounting roughly to an exhortation not to do anything that might bring the monarchy into disrepute. And really, that says it all. It’s certainly all you can say to a group of people whose raison d’etre is to be above the rules invented for the hoi polloi. Page | 5 That way, the magic has a chance to survive, if we want it to. It certainly won’t survive the resentful scrutiny of a register of interests, even if such a document could ever be accurately drawn up. This begs a few questions. Self-regulation is the only sort of regulation that will ever work with people who are above common reproach. But how can it be applied if the only sanction – the threat of incurring the Queen’s displeasure – is ineffective? Rules must now be invented, not because the management has pre-empted the problem and is now applying stern correction, but because an enterprising tabloid reporter pretended to be a foreign businessman. Half a dozen words of majestic displeasure would perhaps have done more to reassure loyal subjects than the lengthy explanation that was put out as the Queen’s response. Let the spin doctors with whom Her Majesty is now so expensively equipped fill in the supporting stuff about “breaking new ground in this day and age”, if they really must. We want to believe that we have a Queen who will put the fear of God into any relative who even thinks of exploiting their kinship. The Queen has formidable disciplinary powers over family matters, but the perception of her authority is being dissipated by spin. So we are stuck with the justice of the media lynch mob: vulgar, impertinent, demoralising and depressingly effective. So what price the magic now? The Queen’s generation has witnessed the rapid fading of imperial red from the atlas of the world. Even when Tony Blair went to Fettes, she still reigned over vast swathes of Africa, the Caribbean and Asia, not to mention the Old Commonwealth. In my years in the household I often wandered through our great palaces, wondering at the survival of our essentially Victorian monarchy in the face of such irreversible national decline. Quaint, certainly, and enjoyable too, in a Ruritanian sort of way. But no more guaranteed a future than the Queen’s birthday celebrations on St. Helena. But wait a minute. Haven’t the papers been daily reminding us that the Queen’s heir is the dynamic force for change that emerges from the Wessex wreck like a beacon of hope? Indeed they have, thanks to the assiduous efforts of the Prince of Wales’s own image- management consultants. But it’s not hope that their work illuminates. It’s despair. Page | 6 Internecine warfare has been part of our court life ever since we invented royalty. Usually it stays safely behind palace walls. Its emergence into the public consciousness at this critical point is highly significant and deeply worrying to loyal obervers. It has reached a point where no realistic reading of today’s royal stories is complete without wondering which opposing teams of royal spin doctors are responsible for which damaging headlines. Unfortunately, it seems that the spin alchemists have only the poiticians’ code of ethics. No more should be expected of them. Which would be okay if their royal employers had the best politicians’ wisdom and moral self-assurance to redress the imbalance. But not all of them do. Instead they seem bewitched by the siren voices of their unscrupulous media manipulators. Not only is the royal ship now heading for the rocks, but the officers are squabbling on the bridge and paying the pushier passengers to have a go at the helm. I hate to say it, but the Prince of Wales is not a reformer. He is not even a moderniser. He’s a tinkerer, and a self-indulgent one at that. His well-publicised desire to jettison the “minor royals” sometimes looks like a handy way to bag the remaining deckchairs for himself. The minor royals are not the heart of the problem, however they might irritate their elders’ media advisers. At the core of our royal family’s dilemma is their tendency – which we have allowed them – to treat the truth as an optional extra. In his marriage, the Prince of Wales had the best real safeguard of the monarchy’s future. The marriage’s failure is a sharp reminder of royalty’s human frailty. So is its understandable vulnerability to soothing PR overtures. But our instinctive sympathy struggles with what has followed. For example, I’m sure Sophie got this right [taped in the sting] a lot of people don’t want Camilla to be queen. But she won’t be queen, say the prince’s apologists. By which they mean she won’t have that title. If you believe that removes her from our national shop window, then you are misinformed about how power is really brokered in the royal hothouse.
Recommended publications
  • Nysba Spring 2020 | Vol
    NYSBA SPRING 2020 | VOL. 31 | NO. 2 Entertainment, Arts and Sports Law Journal A publication of the Entertainment, Arts and Sports Law Section of the New York State Bar Association In This Issue n A Case of “Creative Destruction”: Takeaways from the 5Pointz Graffiti Dispute n The American Actress, the English Duchess, and the Privacy Litigation n The Battle Against the Bots: The Legislative Fight Against Ticket Bots ....and more www.nysba.org/EASL NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION In The Arena: A Sports Law Handbook Co-sponsored by the New York State Bar Association and the Entertainment, Arts and Sports Law Section As the world of professional athletics has become more competitive and the issues more complex, so has the need for more reliable representation in the field of sports law. Written by dozens of sports law attorneys and medical professionals, In the Arena: A Sports Law Handbook is a reflection of the multiple issues that face athletes and the attorneys who represent them. Included in this book are chapters on representing professional athletes, NCAA enforcement, advertising, sponsorship, intellectual property rights, doping, concussion-related issues, Title IX and dozens of useful appendices. Table of Contents Intellectual Property Rights and Endorsement Agreements How Trademark Protection Intersects with the Athlete’s EDITORS Right of Publicity Elissa D. Hecker, Esq. Collective Bargaining in the Big Three David Krell, Esq. Agency Law Sports, Torts and Criminal Law PRODUCT INFO AND PRICES 2013 | 539 pages Role of Advertising and Sponsorship in the Business of Sports PN: 4002 (Print) Doping in Sport: A Historical and Current Perspective PN: 4002E (E-Book) Athlete Concussion-Related Issues Non-Members $80 Concussions—From a Neuropsychological and Medical Perspective NYSBA Members $65 In-Arena Giveaways: Sweepstakes Law Basics and Compliance Issues Order multiple titles to take advantage of our low flat Navigating the NCAA Enforcement Process rate shipping charge of $5.95 per order, regardless of the number of items shipped.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Mail Letters Email Address
    Daily Mail Letters Email Address statistically.Anurag is quadruplicate If arboraceous and or eff fatuous casually Stevie as optional usually Wardenoverheard follow-through his boscages desultorily overglancing and glancinglyedulcorating or barbotinereclimbing so anxiously ruggedly! and chaffingly, how sterile is Dietrich? Involved Mort profiling some jovialness and saints his Part of the same ads hint, our service was not being reported in favour of corporations own words, daily mail letters Make are to confident the changes. What really my mailing address? When you recall an announcement or just news release, both are acting as a reporter. Senior managers have responsibility for key businesses or functions within this Group. Editing is non existent. ITV show but confessed that maintaining her gym almost resulted in family arguments. ID email yesterday or today. All six months away the royal mail limited evidence of the daily mail letters are responding to do you! Very self to navigate by no pop up adverts! Writers retain rights to stress work after publication. Dial the above number and report in case you ensure not receive three scratch card along with now Daily Mail or The Mail on Sunday. Class Package International Service. The editorial staff have be contacted for printing new title or latest news. Letters become the property probably The Times and team be edited for publication. Such coverage would quickly cover to approximate in Parliament who are petrified both of Brexit and of legislation seen to brazen it. Always be cautious about search you befriend and what you word on social media. Both forms are show through UH Postal Services.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Actress, the English Duchess, and the Privacy Litigation by Amber Melville-Brown
    The American Actress, the English Duchess, and the Privacy Litigation By Amber Melville-Brown First Brexit, Now Megzit... trip back to the motherland In a move more resonant with players of the TV were dashed with the event show “Survival” than with members of the British royal postponed amid the CO- family, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex—Prince Harry VID-19 coronavirus pan- and Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex—blindsided demic, even ironically as his senior royals with a unilateral announcement that they father HRH Prince Charles intended to “carve out a progressive new role”1 within the himself actually succumbed royal family, and by the surprise launch of their own and tested positive for the independent website. The relatively sparsely populated virus. www.sussexroyal.com—including a personal statement The couple’s new social about their recently launched media litigation, reference media sites also suffered a to the Royal Rota media system that they are rejecting, blow; the new relationship and to the Information Commissioner’s Office public carved out in negotiations interest test under the Freedom of Information Act—sug- between the royal fam- gests strongly that it is the couple’s tense relationship ily and the couple as they venture out on their own saw with the media that has led them to seek a new “working them having to abandon use of the “Sussex Royal” brand model” in 2020. with which they heralded the new them, before the ink on Indeed, if this announcement was intended to foster the new branding was really even dry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Death of an Icon Facil Ute Core Core Tie Modiam, Conulla
    WW | xxxxxxxx THIS STORY ALWAYS HAD everything, didn’t it? The blushing young innocent who transformed herself into the most adored – and most hunted – woman in the world. The Cinderella who found her Prince Charming – or thought she did – and then entered the palace via the golden carriage. The fairytale but fraudulent wedding of the century, followed by that grim parable of death in the Paris tunnel. The romance, the adultery, the royal intrigue, the eternal, hopeless quest for love, the media’s crazed preoccupation and pursuit. TIn her lifetime, Diana was the People’s Princess who, in death, became the Sleeping Beauty and the Lady of the Lake. She was the stuff that myths are made of and, like her or not, believe it or not, hers was a tale of epic, monumental proportions, that mesmerised the world for 16 years – from the time she walked down the aisle in St Paul’s Cathedral to the time of her funeral in Westiminster Abbey, witnessed by, what was it, a quarter of the world’s population? permafrost and the duke’s Teutonic coldness Think of Marilyn Monroe, Princess Grace, to Diana’s single-minded pursuit of Prince Greta Garbo, Jackie Onassis, perhaps even Charles and her elder son, William’s, interest Mother Theresa, and roll them into one in becoming governor-general of Australia. iconic figure, and you might approach the The Diana Spencer that emerges from fame, the celebrity of Diana Spencer, the pages of Tina Brown’s The Diana Celebrated editor Tina Princess of Wales. As Martin Amis, the Chronicles is at once childish, scheming, Brown’s sensational new writer, once said, “Madonna sings.
    [Show full text]
  • Brand Finance Monarchy 2017 Report
    Monarchy 2017 The annual report on the value of the British Monarchy November 2017 To coincide with the granting of the Brand Finance Coat of Arms by the College of Arms Contents Foreword Foreword 3 This year marks exactly 25 years since the Windsor Castle fire – the event that came to symbolise the nadir of the sovereign’s annus horribilis. Executive Summary 4 A quarter of a century on from one of its most turbulent years, the British Brand Finance Network Comments 10 Monarchy is enjoying immense popularity. As the Queen and Duke of Methodology 12 Edinburgh celebrate their Platinum Wedding Anniversary and reduce their public engagements, the attraction of the youngest generation of the Royal The Value of Royal Warrants 14 Family ensures the institution’s survival in the future. The Monarchy and British Luxury Brands in China 15 Thanks to this combination of high esteem and universal appeal, the Monarchy’s influence extends far beyond pomp and circumstance, and Coats of Arms – Past and Present 16 generates a substantial uplift to the UK economy, spanning various Why Coats of Arms Matter to Brands 17 David Haigh industries. CEO Brand Finance Coats of Arms Service 18 Brand Finance plc Since its inception in 2012, our study attempts to capture the contribution generated by the Monarchy to tourism, trade, media, and the effect it has on About Brand Finance & Contact Details 19 [email protected] Brand Britain as well as on British corporate brands benefitting from Royal Warrants and Coats of Arms but also informal endorsements from members of the Royal Family.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrong’ to Retweet Hate Group Videos N PM Condemns President’S Britain First Tweet but Rejects Calls to Cancel State Visit
    The british Weekly, Sat. December 2, 2017 Page 1 May wedding date in Windsor for Harry and Meghan - Page 3 California’s British Accent ™ - Since 1984 Saturday, December 2, 2017 • Number 1706 Always Free MAY: Trump was ‘wrong’ to retweet hate group videos n PM condemns President’s Britain First Tweet but rejects calls to cancel state visit THE GROWING RIFT between London and Washington opened a little wider this week as the Prime Minister said it was “wrong” for US President Donald Trump to retweet videos posted by far-right group Britain First. But she stressed the Mr Trump’s retweeting immigration and anti- “special relationship” of posts by a far-right abortion policies, but has between Britain and the group “risks legitimising yet to secure any seats. US was “in both our those who want to The frst tweet, from nations’ interests” and spread fear and hatred,” deputy leader Jayda should continue. Ms Sturgeon said, Fransen, claims to show a And she rejected calls to and was “completely Muslim migrant attacking cancel a state visit by the unacceptable”. a man on crutches. US president. Mr Trump shared three This was followed by Speaking on a visit to posts by the group’s two more videos of people Jordan, she said: “An deputy leader, including Ms Fransen claims to be invitation for a state visit unverifed footage Muslim. has been extended and purporting to show Mr Trump’s retweets has been accepted. We Muslims committing prompted a wave of have yet to set a date.” crimes. criticism from British Quizzed about Mr Theresa May’s politicians and from Trump’s tweets, she said: spokesman said Britain groups representing UK “The fact that we work First used “hateful Muslims.
    [Show full text]
  • KNOWLEDGE – International Journal Vol.38.6 from BREXIT to MEGXIT - LEAVING BRITAIN in (ROYAL) STYLE
    KNOWLEDGE – International Journal Vol.38.6 FROM BREXIT TO MEGXIT - LEAVING BRITAIN IN (ROYAL) STYLE Aleksandra Aleksandrova Konstantin Preslavski University of Shumen, Shumen, Bulgaria, [email protected] Abstract: When a certain expression appears in the media and becomes popular, new expressions copying its sound patterns are formed. This way, the new coinages are associated with the initial expression and acquire something of its meaning. The paper deals with the neologisms based on the name of the Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle. These neologisms were formed in relation with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex decision to leave their duties as royalties. The most frequently used such neologism, Megxit is defined by the Macmillan dictionary as “a humorous term for the decision of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to step back from their royal duties” (https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/megxit). In its turn, it produced other neologisms derived from it. The structure of Megxit is based on the pattern of the neologism Brexit (Britain + exit), standing for “the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union” (https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/brexit). It is formed by blending the personal name Meghan and the verb exit. After The new coinage Megxit became relatively well established, it led to other neologisms related to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’ withdrawal from their royal duties. Some of them are derived from Megxit, such as Megxitee, Mexiteer, Megxiter, while other are a combination from the personal name Meghan and another suffix (Megulators, Meghangate). The neologism Megxit appeared as a noun, but later it started being used as a verb.
    [Show full text]
  • Contextual Information Timelines and Family Trees Tudors to Windsors: British Royal Portraits 16 March – 14 July 2019
    16 March — 14 July 2019 British Royal Portraits Exhibition organised by the National Portrait Gallery, London Contextual Information Timelines and Family Trees Tudors to Windsors: British Royal Portraits 16 March – 14 July 2019 Tudors to Windsors traces the history of the British monarchy through the outstanding collection of the National Portrait Gallery, London. This exhibition highlights major events in British (and world) history from the sixteenth century to the present, examining the ways in which royal portraits were impacted by both the personalities of individual monarchs and wider historical change. Presenting some of the most significant royal portraits, the exhibition will explore five royal dynasties: the Tudors, the Stuarts, the Georgians, the Victorians and the Windsors shedding light on key figures and important historical moments. This exhibition also offers insight into the development of British art including works by the most important artists to have worked in Britain, from Sir Peter Lely and Sir Godfrey Kneller to Cecil Beaton and Annie Leibovitz. 2 UK WORLDWIDE 1485 Henry Tudor defeats Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth Field, becoming King Henry VII The Tudors and founding the Tudor dynasty 1492 An expedition led by Italian explorer Christopher Columbus encounters the Americas 1509 while searching for a Western passage to Asia Henry VII dies and is succeeded Introduction by King Henry VIII 1510 The Inca abandon the settlement of Machu Picchu in modern day Peru Between 1485 and 1603, England was ruled by 1517 Martin Luther nails his 95 theses to the five Tudor monarchs. From King Henry VII who won the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg, crown in battle, to King Henry VIII with his six wives and a catalyst for the Protestant Reformation 1519 Elizabeth I, England’s ‘Virgin Queen’, the Tudors are some Hernando Cortes lands on of the most familiar figures in British history.
    [Show full text]
  • Reuters Annual Report 1-11.Indd
    Annual Report 2010 | 2011 Reuters Institute for the Study of Annual Report ‘10/‘11 Journalism Preface 04/ Director’s Report 05/ Director of Journalism’s Report: The Year in News 07/ Interview with Robert Picard, Director of Research 09/ RISJ International Impact and Infl uence 11/ The Journalism Fellowship Programme 15/ Visiting Fellows 19/ Research 21/ Publications 27/ Events 30/ Staff 37/ Governance 39/ Benefactors 41/ Appendix: Journalist Fellows 2010–11 42 / 2 Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Reuters Institute Annual Report Preface ‘10/‘11 The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism is now international news providers, sponsored by the BBC, the starting to achieve the scale and impact that was its ambition Carnegie Foundation and France 24, was conducting its when it was launched fi ve years ago. The Institute sets out to fi eldwork in pre- and post-revolution Egypt. Our Journalist bridge the gap between academia and media practice and Fellows, past and present, have reported from Egypt and policy in the study of international comparative journalism. Its Libya for news organisations worldwide. foundation has rested on the close relationship between its The Thomson Reuters Foundation has extended our current sponsoring Department at Oxford University, the Department grant which funds our core operations until the end of of Politics and International Relations, and the Thomson 2014. The Department of Politics has agreed to fund a Reuters Foundation, our core funder and sponsor. We are new post-doctoral researcher at the Institute who will deeply grateful to both for their substantial new commitments Tim Gardam develop academic research on media and democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Foundation's Annual Report
    Company Registration No. 7033553 Charity Registration No. 1132048 The Royal Foundation of The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge (formerly The Royal Foundation of The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and The Duke and Duchess of Sussex) Report and Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2019 The Royal Foundation of The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge (formerly The Royal Foundation of The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and The Duke and Duchess of Sussex) Company Registration No. 7033553 Contents Page Principals and Members, Officers and Professional Advisers 1 Letter from the Chair of the Board 2 Trustees' report - incorporating the Directors' report for Companies Act purposes 4 Independent Auditor's report 16 Consolidated statement of financial activities 19 Charity statement of financial activities 20 Consolidated and charity balance sheet 21 Consolidated and charity cash flow statement 22 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 23 The Royal Foundation of The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge (formerly The Royal Foundation of The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and The Duke and Duchess of Sussex) Company Registration No. 7033553 Principals and Members TRH The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge Trustees Sir Keith Mills, GBE, DL – Chairman Tessa Green, CBE Edward Harley, OBE, DL (resigned 18 September 2019) Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton, LVO, MBE, DL Charles Mindenhall Guy Monson (appointed 18 September 2019, resigned 10 December 2019) Simon Patterson Lady Pinsent Claire Wills Ex Officio Trustees Simon Case, CVO (appointed 8 August 2019)
    [Show full text]
  • United Kingdom Veteran Landscape
    Military, Veterans, and Society | AUGUST 2020 United Kingdom Veteran Landscape Emma Moore Kayla Williams Zachary Jaynes Center for a New American Security 1152 15th Street NW, Suite 950, Washington, DC 20005 T: 202.457.9400 F: 202.457.9401 CNAS.org @CNASdc United Kingdom Veteran Landscape 2 About the Authors Army (Norton, 2006) and Plenty of Time When We Get Home: Love and Recovery in the Zachary Jaynes is a former Joseph S. Nye Jr. Aftermath of War (Norton, 2014). She holds a Intern for the Military, Veterans, and Society BA from Bowling Green State University and an Program at the Center for a New American MA from American University. Williams is a Security (CNAS). Jaynes is a junior at former member of the VA Advisory Committee Dartmouth College which he attends as a Posse on Women Veterans and the Army Education Foundation Scholar. He is double majoring in Advisory Committee and a current member of government and Middle Eastern studies with a the Department of Labor Advisory Committee on focus on national security. He has worked as a Veterans’ Employment, Training, and Employer research assistant in Dartmouth’s Department of Outreach. She is a 2013 White House Woman Government and was selected to be a War and Veteran Champion of Change and a 2015 Peace Fellow at the John Sloan Dickey Center Lincoln Award recipient. for International Understanding. Prior to Dartmouth, Jaynes was enlisted for five years as About the Military, Veterans, and Society an infantryman and reconnaissance, Program surveillance, and target acquisition scout in 3rd Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reign and Reception of Queen Elizabeth II: a Post-Diamond-Jubilee Retrospect Vláda a Veřejné Vnímání Královny Alžběty II
    Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích Pedagogická fakulta Katedra anglistiky Bakalářská práce The Reign and Reception of Queen Elizabeth II: A Post-Diamond-Jubilee Retrospect Vláda a veřejné vnímání královny Alžběty II. v retrospekci po diamantovém výročí vlády Vypracovala: Markéta Pavlíčková ČJu-AJu-SZu Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Renata Janktová, M.A. České Budějovice 2021 Prohlašuji, že svoji bakalářskou práci jsem vypracovala samostatně pouze s použitím pramenů a literatury uvedených v seznamu citované literatury. Prohlašuji, že v souladu s § 47b zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. v platném znění souhlasím se zveřejněním své bakalářské práce, a to v nezkrácené podobě - v úpravě vzniklé vypuštěním vyznačených částí archivovaných pedagogickou fakultou elektronickou cestou ve veřejně přístupné části databáze STAG provozované Jihočeskou univerzitou v Českých Budějovicích na jejích internetových stránkách, a to se zachováním mého autorského práva k odevzdanému textu této kvalifikační práce. Souhlasím dále s tím, aby toutéž elektronickou cestou byly v souladu s uvedeným ustanovením zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. zveřejněny posudky školitele a oponentů práce i záznam o průběhu a výsledku obhajoby kvalifikační práce. Rovněž souhlasím s porovnáním textu mé kvalifikační práce s databází kvalifikačních prací Theses.cz provozovanou Národním registrem vysokoškolských kvalifikačních prací a systémem na odhalování plagiátů. V Českých Budějovicích dne …. Markéta Pavlíčková Abstract The bachelor thesis analyses the reign of Queen Elizabeth II from the perspective of public opinion in Great Britain. It identifies and assesses critical milestones during Queen Elizabeth II’s reign and their impact on her public image and reception. The thesis focuses on the critical milestones from the tragic death of Princess Diana till the last affairs in 2020.
    [Show full text]