DOCSLIB.ORG

4.1 Tennis Forehand Spin Control: Spin Wedge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4.1 Tennis Forehand Spin Control: Spin Wedge 4.1 Tennis Forehand Spin Control: Spin Wedge Hi guys, and welcome back. Today we’re going to do a video all about spin -- whether it’s talking about topspin, backspin -- any kind of spin that you want. We’re going to talk about the three different factors that go into creating the perfect amount of spin for your individual shot, and we’re going to talk about something called the Spin Wedge. If you want to master the art of spin, let’s go ahead and get started! The first thing we’ll talk about is, what are the three factors that create spin? Again, we’re talking about any type of spin, whether it’s backspin, side spin, topspin, any of that stuff. The three factors are, number one, the angle of the face. Here, if my racket’s straight up and down, the face is pointing directly forward or parallel with the ground. As I begin to open this up, my face will be pointing more toward the sky. Then if I point my face down, it’s obviously going to be going more down toward the ground. That’s really going to affect the initial angle that your ball takes off. The second factor is which direction my racket is moving. You can imagine, if my racket is moving up and forward...we’re talking about the center of the racket, which direction it’s moving. A great way to visualize this, if we turn the racket the other way, then you can see if I’m moving up and forward. This would be up and forward at a 45° angle. That’s very similar to what you’ll see with the top pros on the ATP tour. They’re swinging up and forward on their topspin forehand about at a 45° angle. The direction of the face and the direction of the path, or the direction the racket is moving, is going to really affect which way the ball is going to spin. The opposite of that would be the racket moving down and forward. This would be kind of a backspin shot. We’ll get into the details of that here in a second. The final factor into this is going to be how hard we’re swinging, or how fast the racket head is moving. As I mentioned, on a stock topspin forehand from your top pros, what you’re going to see at impact is when the strings meet the ball, the racket face is turned down about 10°. This would be parallel with the ground. It’s turned down about 10°, and the racket head itself is moving up and forward about 45°. The faster this is happening, the faster my racket is moving upward, the more spin is going to be put on the ball. Just realize that; the harder you’re hitting, the more spin it’s getting. You may be doing everything correct, and if you’re not seeing the ball really dive down like you’re seeing with the top pros when you watch on TV, it may just be because you’re not swinging quite hard enough. Master the technique first, and then you can add some speed to that later, to really perfect it. Let’s focus on those other two factors here really quick, and I’ll give you a couple examples of how that works. Whenever we’re creating topspin, we’re going to focus on the path and the face angle. Let’s imagine for this example that my face angle is going to be perfectly parallel with the court. My strings are pointing directly forward. We’re going to imagine this is a giant tennis ball. For this example, my racket is going to be up and forward, just like we talked about on the topspin forehand, at about 45°. As I make contact with this ball, what’s happening is it’s spinning it end-over-end and creating topspin. Because the ball is spinning forward like this when I do that type of motion, the top of the ball is spinning into the wind. The bottom of the ball is spinning away from the wind, and that creates more friction on top of the ball and causes that ball to dive downward. The harder we do this, the faster we swing, the more of that downward curvature it’s going to get. Again if the strings are level, my racket is moving upward, I’m spinning this ball end-over-end, having the top of the ball move forward in this direction. That’s topspin. I mentioned that the face is really going to affect this. In this particular example, the face was level with the ground; we’ll have that be our first arrow here, and our path was up at 45°. The difference between those two angles is what’s going to be called our Spin Wedge. Our face angle is parallel with the ground. Our path where the racket is moving is 45° upward, so we have 45° difference in this spin wedge or this wedge angle here. If we start to manipulate that, we’re either going to get more or less spin. The bigger the difference in those two angles, the more spin you’re going to create, whether it’s topspin or backspin. The smaller the difference in those two angles, the less spin you’re going to generate. Let’s give example number two here of how that’s going to work. In the first one racket strings were parallel, the face was up 45°, and I created quite a bit of topspin. Remember, the tour pros are pretty close to that when they’re hitting their topspin forehand. Their racket face is just pointed down a little bit to affect the launch. We’ll go over that in our Height Control video. Now let’s imagine that I turn my racket to where the racket is 45° open and my path stays 45° open. Now my racket face is up 45° and my path is also up 45°, so there’s no Spin Wedge. Both those lines are going in the same direction, and you can see how that would create a knuckleball. Even though I’m swinging it up, I’m brushing up on the ball, it’s not getting any topspin. It’s just knuckling forward. That may be one of the mistakes that you guys are having if you’re working on topspin and you’re being told to hit up on the ball. Every time you hit up on the ball, the ball just flies higher in the air and you don’t get any more topspin, so you hit it long or out of the court, and you’re frustrated with it. Well, we need to create that wedge. We have to get the racket strings, instead of facing up as you’re swinging up and the ball’s not getting any topspin, shooting really high, we have to turn those strings down just like the top pros. Now, the ball is going to come out lower and it’s going to have that topspin. That Spin Wedge is really going to determine how much spin you want to have on there. If I were to turn my racket strings down and now I swing up 60°, even more steeply, I’m going to get more topspin. Remember, the strings have to be parallel or even about 10° down, if you want to hit one of those good forehands. If we turn that wedge the other direction, now let’s imagine for the same scenario that we’re going to hit a backspin shot or a slice type shot. Now my racket face is going to be moving -- the path of the racket, the first part of the wedge -- is going to be moving down 45°, but the face is going to be moving up 10° now. Again, we have that same wedge. The path is moving down 45°, the face is pointing up 10°. If we can imagine that on this ball, now the ball is going to be spinning backwards. That’s a pretty good-sized wedge, down 45° and up 10°, we’ve got 55° Spin Wedge, which is going to allow us to create a lot of backspin. If we do the same thing there, where we’re hitting down and the racket face is pointing down 45°, now we’re going to be hitting the ball straight down into the ground. We’re not going to get any spin, it’s just going to be going straight down. Again, if you guys have been practicing hitting your slice shots and often what happens is you’re hitting the ball into the ground, you’re probably swinging down really well. You’re generating the path correctly, but the face just needs to be turned up a little bit more. Or vice versa, if you’re swinging down and the ball is floating too high -- you’re getting good spin but it’s floating up in the air -- your face is probably too far open. We’re going to adjust that as we go forward in our Height Control video. We just need to understand, before we start any of this, that the bigger that Spin Wedge, the more spin we’re going to have. We’re going to control that in our more advanced shots. Now let’s go ahead and do some drills to really start practicing with that, generate some good spin, and then we’ll move on to the next steps.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A-4E Finds New Home Tasked with Transferring the Craft
    7!1 7 Vol. 24, No. 6 Serving Marine Forces Pacific, MCB Hawaii, Ill Marine Expeditionary Forces, Hawaii and 1st Radio Battalion February 15, 1996 A-4E finds new home tasked with transferring the craft. It LC,p1. Steven Williams is the only unit in Hawaii with heavy-lift capability. The other mili- The Aviation Support Element and tary installations on the island don't Combat Service Support Group-3 have the aircraft to lift the jet, aboard MCB Hawaii teamed up according to Maj. Jesse E. Wrice, Monday to transfer a 7,000-pound ASE operations officer. Douglas A-4E Skyhawk from Naval The six leaders in the transfer pro- Air Station Barbers Point to ject surveyed the jet Jan. 22. to Dillingham Air Field. ensure the aircraft was safe to move. The aircraft was donated to the "We did all of our homework in Find what's got the dolphins Hawaiian Historical Aviation January so it would run smoothly in jumping. See B-1 for story. Foundation, a non-profit organiza- February," said Wrice. tion, Sept. 19 by the Navy's Fleet Before it was transferred, the jet's Composite Squadron 1. The nose gear door was removed and the Great Aloha Run squadron decommissioned in tail hook was dropped. Dropping the September 1993 leaving most of its tail hook allowed the belly bands to transportation aircraft to the National Naval sit flesh on the aircraft's stomach. Aviation Museum in Pensacola, Fla. The team also added 400 to 600 The 12th annual Great Aloha Following the down-size, HHAF put pounds of weight to the nose of the Run will be held Monday at 7 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan Studies Review
    JAPAN STUDIES REVIEW Volume Nineteen 2015 Interdisciplinary Studies of Modern Japan Steven Heine Editor Editorial Board John A. Tucker, East Carolina University Yumiko Hulvey, University of Florida Matthew Marr, Florida International University Ann Wehmeyer, University of Florida Hitomi Yoshio, Florida International University Copy and Production María Sol Echarren Rebecca Richko Ian Verhine Kimberly Zwez JAPAN STUDIES REVIEW VOLUME NINETEEN 2015 A publication of Florida International University and the Southern Japan Seminar CONTENTS Editor’s Introduction i Re: Subscriptions, Submissions, and Comments ii ARTICLES Going Postal: Empire Building through Miniature Messages on German and Japanese Stamps Fabian Bauwens 3 Old, New, Borrowed, and Blue: Hiroshi Senju’s Waterfall Paintings as Intersections of Innovation Peter L. Doebler 37 Delightfully Sauced: Wine Manga and the Japanese Sommelier’s Rise to the Top of the French Wine World Jason Christopher Jones 55 “Fairness” and Japanese Government Subsidies for Sickness Insurances Yoneyuki Sugita 85 ESSAYS A “Brief Era of Experimentation”: How the Early Meiji Political Debates Shaped Japanese Political Terminology Bradly Hammond 117 The Night Crane: Nun Abutsu’s Yoru No Tsuru Introduced, Translated, and Annotated Eric Esteban 135 BOOK REVIEWS Scream from the Shadows: The Women’s Liberation Movement in Japan By Setsu Shigematsu Reviewed by Julia C. Bullock 169 Critical Buddhism: Engaging with Modern Japanese Buddhist Thought By James Mark Shields Reviewed by Steven Heine 172 Banzai Babe Ruth: Baseball, Espionage, & Assassination During the 1934 Tour of Japan By Robert K. Fitts Reviewed by Daniel A. Métraux 175 Supreme Commander: MacArther’s Triumph in Japan By Seymour Morris Reviewed by Daniel A. Métraux 177 CONTRIBUTORS/EDITORS i EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION Welcome to the nineteenth volume of the Japan Studies Review (JSR), an annual peer-reviewed journal sponsored by the Asian Studies Program at Florida International University Seminar.
    [Show full text]
  • Positioning Youth Tennis for Success-W References 2.Indd
    POSITIONING YOUTH TENNIS FOR SUCCESS POSITIONING YOUTH TENNIS FOR SUCCESS BRIAN HAINLINE, M.D. CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION United States Tennis Association Incorporated 70 West Red Oak Lane, White Plains, NY 10604 usta.com © 2013 United States Tennis Association Incorporated. All rights reserved. PREFACE The Rules of Tennis have changed! That’s right. For only the fifth time in the history of tennis, the Rules of Tennis have changed. The change specifies that sanctioned events for kids 10 and under must be played with some variation of the courts, rules, scoring and equipment utilized by 10 and Under Tennis. In other words, the Rules of Tennis now take into account the unique physical and physiological attributes of children. Tennis is no longer asking children to play an adult-model sport. And the rule change could not have come fast enough. Something drastic needs to happen if the poor rate of tennis participation in children is taken seriously. Among children under 10, tennis participation pales in relation to soccer, baseball, and basketball. Worse, only .05 percent of children under 10 who play tennis participate in USTA competition. Clearly, something is amiss, and the USTA believes that the new rule governing 10-and- under competition will help transform tennis participation among American children through the USTA’s revolutionary 10 and Under Tennis platform. The most basic aspect of any sport rollout is to define the rules of engagement for training and competition. So in an attempt to best gauge how to provide the proper foundation for kids to excel in tennis—through training, competition, and transition—the USTA held its inaugural Youth Tennis Symposium in February 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Tennis Terms
    Glossary of Tennis Terms • A o Ace: a service point won by the server because the receiver doesn’t return, or even touch, the ball. Advantage (or ad) court: left-hand side of the court. o Advantage (or Ad): the point played after deuce, which if won, ends the game. o Advantage set: a set that can only be won when one opponent has won six games and is two games clear of their opponent. o All: term used when both players have the same number of points from 15-15 (15-all) to 30- 30 (30-all). When the score is 40-40 the term is deuce. o All-court player: someone who is equally comfortable playing from the baseline, mid-court and net. o Alley: (see tramlines.) o Approach shot: a shot used by a player to pin their opponent behind the baseline so that they can run to the net for a volley. • B o Back court: area behind the court between the baseline and the back fence. o Backhand: shot struck by holding the racquet in the dominant hand but swinging the racquet from the non-dominant side of the body with the back of the dominant hand pointing in the direction the ball is being hit. (See also two-handed backhand.) o Backspin: spin imparted on the underside of the ball causing it to revolve backwards while travelling forwards. Used in slice and drop shots. o Backswing: component of the swing where the racquet is taken back behind the body in preparation for the forward motion that leads to contact with the ball.
    [Show full text]
  • First 4 Shots Belgium
    Let’s Connect Instagram coshannessy Twitter @BrainGameTennis Facebook BrainGameTennis Website www.braingametennis.com E-Mail [email protected] The First 4 Shots Building Blocks Matches Sets Games Points No. 1 in the World YEAR PLAYER W/L MATCH WIN % 2018 Novak Djokovic 49-11 82% 2017 Rafael Nadal 67-11 86% 2016 Andy Murray 78-9 90% 2015 Novak Djokovic 82-6 93% 2014 Novak Djokovic 61-8 88% 2013 Rafael Nadal 75-7 92% 2012 Novak Djokovic 75-12 86% 2011 Novak Djokovic 70-6 92% 2010 Rafael Nadal 71-10 88% - TOTAL / AVERAGE 628 - 80 89% Building Blocks Matches = 89% Points = ? No. 1 Player: Points Won 55% YEAR PLAYER POINTS WON % 2018 N. Djokovic 54% 2017 R. Nadal 56% 2016 A. Murray 55% 2015 N. Djokovic 56% 2014 N. Djokovic 55% 2013 R. Nadal 55% 2012 N. Djokovic 55% 2011 N. Djokovic 56% 2010 R. Nadal 55% 2009 R. Federer 54% 2001 L. Hewitt 53% 2000 G. Kuerten 53% 1996 P. Sampras 53% 1991 S. Edberg 53% 2018: Top 50 Percentage Points Won Top 50: True / False More than 20% of the Top 50 in 2018 lost more points than they won? Top 50: True / False True 11/50 (22%) lost more points than they won in 2018 Top 50: 2018 Season RANKING POINTS WON POINTS PLAYED WIN % 1-10 54,424 103,105 52.79% 11-20 46,260 90,239 51.26% 21-30 42,648 83,797 50.89% 31-40 37,101 73,685 50.35% 41-50 36,832 74,261 49.60% TOTAL/AVERAGE 217,265 425,087 51.11% Average / Points Won Top 10 = 53% Top 50 = 51% 2016 Season RANKING PLAYER % POINTS WON PRIZEMONEY 1 Andy Murray 55% $13,327,822 2 Novak Djokovic 55% $12,630,465 5 Kei Nishikori 53% $4,324,963 10 Tomas Berdych 52% $2,318,756 20 Ivo Karlovic 50% $1,267,348 50 Florian Mayer 49% $695,103 Karlovic = No.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinematic Analysis of the Racket Position During the Table Tennis Top Spin Forehand Stroke
    applied sciences Article Kinematic Analysis of the Racket Position during the Table Tennis Top Spin Forehand Stroke Ivan Malagoli Lanzoni 1,* , Sandro Bartolomei 1 , Rocco Di Michele 1, Yaodong Gu 2 , Julien S. Baker 3 , Silvia Fantozzi 4 and Matteo Cortesi 5 1 Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] (S.B.); [email protected] (R.D.M.) 2 Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China; [email protected] 3 Centre for Health and Exercise Science Research, Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong; [email protected] 4 Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] 5 Department of Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-051-2088777 Abstract: The present study aims to assess the position of the racket, and racket height with respect to the floor, during the table tennis top spin stroke. A stereophotogrammetric system (Smart-D, BTS, 8 cameras, 550 Hz) was used to track the table tennis racket during cross-court (CC) and long-line (LL) shots. Ten national level players completed ten CC and ten LL top spin strokes responding to a robot machine. The racket motion throughout the shot showed specific technical characteristics: the minimum height of the racket was detected during the backswing phase; racket height at the end of backswing phase (maximal distance racket/table) was higher than the minimum; height at Citation: Malagoli Lanzoni, I.; the racket maximum velocity (ball/racket impact) was greater than the net’s height.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurements of the Horizontal Coefficient of Restitution for a Superball and a Tennis Ball
    Measurements of the horizontal coefficient of restitution for a superball and a tennis ball Rod Crossa) Physics Department, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia ͑Received 9 July 2001; accepted 20 December 2001͒ When a ball is incident obliquely on a flat surface, the rebound spin, speed, and angle generally differ from the corresponding incident values. Measurements of all three quantities were made using a digital video camera to film the bounce of a tennis ball incident with zero spin at various angles on several different surfaces. The maximum spin rate of a spherical ball is determined by the condition that the ball commences to roll at the end of the impact. Under some conditions, the ball was found to spin faster than this limit. This result can be explained if the ball or the surface stores energy elastically due to deformation in a direction parallel to the surface. The latter effect was investigated by comparing the bounce of a tennis ball with that of a superball. Ideally, the coefficient of restitution ͑COR͒ of a superball is 1.0 in both the vertical and horizontal directions. The COR for the superball studied was found to be 0.76 in the horizontal direction, and the corresponding COR for a tennis ball was found to vary from Ϫ0.51 to ϩ0.24 depending on the incident angle and the coefficient of sliding friction. © 2002 American Association of Physics Teachers. ͓DOI: 10.1119/1.1450571͔ I. INTRODUCTION scribed as fast, while a surface such as clay, with a high coefficient of friction, is described as slow.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennis in Colorado
    Year 32, Issue 5 The Official Publication OfT ennis Lovers Est. 1976 WINTER 08/09 FALL 2008 From what we get, we can make a living; what we give, however, makes a life. Arthur Ashe Celebrating the true heroes of tennis USTA COLORADO Gates Tennis Center 3300 E Bayaud Ave, Suite 201 Denver, CO 80209 303.695.4116 PAG E 2 COLORADO TENNIS WINTER 2008/2009 VOTED THE #3 BEST TENNIS RESORT IN AMERICA BY TENNIS MAGAZINE TENNIS CAMPS AT THE BROA DMOOR The Broadmoor Staff has been rated as the #1 teaching staff in the country by Tennis Magazine for eight years running. Join us for one of our award-winning camps this winter or spring on our newly renovated courts! If weather is inclement, camps are held in our indoor heated bubble through April. Fall & Winter Camp Dates: Date: Camp Level: Dec 28-30 Professional Staff Camp for 3.0-4.0’s Mixed Doubles “New Year’s Weekend” Feb 13-15 3.5 – 4.0 Mixed Doubles “Valentine’s Weekend” Feb 20-22 3.5 – 4.0 Women’s w/ “Mental Toughness” Clinic Mar 13-15 3.5 – 4.0 Coed Mar 27-29 3.0 – 4.0 Coed “Broadmoor’s Weekend of Jazz” May 22-24 3.5 – 4.0 Coed “Dennis Ralston Premier” Camp May 29 – 31 All Levels “Dennis Ralston Premier” Camp Tennis Camps Include: • 4:1 student/pro (players are grouped with others of their level) • Camp tennis bag, notebook and gift • Intensive instruction and supervised match play • Complimentary court time and match arranging • Special package rates with luxurious Broadmoor room included or commuter rate available SPRING TEAM CAMPS Plan your tennis team getaway to The Broadmoor now! These three-day, two-night weekends are still available for a private team camp: January 9 – 11, April 10 – 12, May 1 – 3.
    [Show full text]
  • All Tennis Grips Explained Clearly
    All Tennis Grips Explained Clearly The tennis grips you use have a big influence on your style of play. This is because the tennis grip is one of the factors that determines how much of spin you put and how much of pace you generate. One grip is not better than another. You should select a grip that helps your style of play. If you are an aggressive player, choose a grip that allows you to hit through the ball and put more pace (think Federer). If you are more of a consistent player, choose a grip that allows you to put more spin (think Nadal). The tennis racket grip is divided into 8 bevels as shown in the diagram. The type of grip depends on which bevel the Index Knuckle and Heel Pad rest. All of the tennis grip diagrams below assume that you are right handed. If you are left handed just reverse the instructions. Serve Continental Grip Use this for the serve, volley, overhead, and slice (all the pros do). The Index Knuckle and Heel Pad rest on bevel 2. Forehand There are three forehand grips. Each grip has its own natural height at which you would contact the ball. The higher the natural contact point, the more naturally you hit across the back of the ball from bottom to top, and more top spin you put on the ball at the expense of pace. This will be clearer as you read about the three forehand grips. Eastern Forehand Grip Index Knuckle and Heel Pad rest on the 3rd bevel.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 107 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 107 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 148 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2002 No. 110 House of Representatives The House met at 2 p.m. and was PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE S. 812. An act to amend the Federal Food, called to order by the Speaker pro tem- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide greater pore (Mr. CULBERSON). access to affordable pharmaceuticals. gentleman from Nevada (Mr. GIBBONS) S. 1010. An act to extend the deadline for f come forward and lead the House in the commencement of construction of a hydro- Pledge of Allegiance. electric project in the State of North Caro- DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER Mr. GIBBONS led the Pledge of Alle- lina. PRO TEMPORE giance as follows: S. 1227. An act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of the suit- The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Repub- ability and feasibility of establishing the Ni- fore the House the following commu- agara Falls National Heritage Area in the nication from the Speaker: lic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. State of New York, and for other purposes. WASHINGTON, DC, S. 1240. An act to provide for the acquisi- September 4, 2002. f tion of land and construction of an inter- I hereby appoint the Honorable JOHN MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE agency administrative and visitor facility at the entrance to American Fork Canyon, ABNEY CULBERSON to act as Speaker pro tem- A message from the Senate by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Little Green Book of Tennis
    THE LITTLE GREEN BOOK OF TENNIS SECOND EDITION TOM PARHAM Copyright © 2015 by Tom Parham All rights reserved. No part of the content of this book may be reproduced without the written permission of Mr. Tom Parham 202 Blue Crab Court Emerald Isle, N. C. 28594 ISBN #: 978-0-9851585-3-8 Second Edition LOC #2015956756 Printed and Bound in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 CONTENTS Harvey Penick’s Book...............................................................................................................2 Mentors...................................................................................................................4 Jim Leighton..............................................................................................................................4 Jim Verdieck...............................................................................................................................6 Keep on Learning......................................................................................................................8 If I Die..........................................................................................................................................9 Ten Ground Stroke Fundamentals......................................................................................9 Move! Concentrate! What DoThey Mean?......................................................................12 Balance Is the Key to GoodTennis........................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Golf Course at Eastward Ho! L 11-20-12
    The Golf Course at Eastward Ho! William L. Healy, MD 2012 1 The Golf Course at Eastward Ho! "The Golf Course at Eastward Ho!" was written to tell the story of the golf course and to describe the eighteen golf holes at Eastward Ho! The impetus for this project was the author's amateur interest in golf course architecture and a desire to apply an evolving knowledge of golf course design to the golf course at Eastward Ho! This essay is not a comprehensive history of Eastward Ho! Edward Harriman (1973, 1978) and Virginia Doherty (1988) have previously recorded the history of the club. This project is limited to the story of the golf course and descriptions of the historic, topographic, architectural, and strategic characteristics of the eighteen golf holes. The hole-by-hole discussions include: yardage from the back tees, par, design characteristics, comments on the history, land, and features of the hole, thoughts on strategic playing of the hole, and names which have been suggested for the hole. "The Golf Course at Eastward Ho!" was initially written by and for the author with no intended audience. A brief essay was begun in 2009, and it has evolved to the present manuscript. The opinions expressed are personal, and they do not represent the club or any committee at Eastward Ho! This work was not authorized by Eastward Ho! The information presented is believed to be accurate, and references have been provided. However, this project is a work in progress. If readers discover incomplete information or unintended errors, please send suggestions for improvement.
    [Show full text]