THE Life of Alcibiades

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE Life of Alcibiades The Life of Alcibiades A volume in the series Cornell Studies in Classical Philology Published in association with the Cornell University Department of Classics Edited by Frederick M. Ahl, Annetta Alexandridis, Benjamin Anderson, Caitlín Eilís Barrett, Tad Brennan, Charles Francis Brittain, Michael Fontaine, Rachana Kamtekar, Sturt Manning, Alan Jeffrey Nussbaum, Hayden Pelliccia, Verity Platt, Éric Rebillard, Courtney Ann Roby, Jeffrey S. Rusten, Barry S. Strauss, Michael L. Weiss A list of titles in this series is available at cornellpress.cornell.edu . VOLUME LXVIII The Life of Alcibiades: Dangerous Ambition and the Betrayal of Athens By Jacqueline de Romilly Translated by Elizabeth Trapnell Rawlings The Life of Alcibiades Dangerous Ambition and the Betrayal of Athens Jacqueline de Romilly Translated by Elizabeth Trapnell Rawlings Cornell University Press Ithaca and London Original French edition, Alcibiade, ou, Les dangers de l'ambition . Copyright © Éditions de Fallois, 1995. English-language translation and translator’s preface copyright © 2019 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. Visit our website at cornellpress.cornell.edu. First published 2019 by Cornell University Press Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Romilly, Jacqueline de, author. | Rawlings, Elizabeth, translator. Title: The life of Alcibiades : dangerous ambition and the betrayal of Athens / Jacqueline de Romilly ; translated by Elizabeth Trapnell Rawlings. Other titles: Alcibiade. English Description: Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 2019. | Series: Cornell studies in classical philology | Includes bibliographical references and indexes. Identifi ers: LCCN 2018059296 (print) | LCCN 2018060257 (ebook) | ISBN 9781501739965 (pdf) | ISBN 9781501739972 (epub/mobi) | ISBN 9781501719752 | ISBN 9781501719752 (cloth) Subjects: LCSH: Alcibiades. | Statesmen—Greece—Athens—Biography. | Generals—Greece—Athens—Biography. | Greece—Foreign relations— To 146 B.C. | Greece—History—Peloponnesian War, 431–404 B.C. Classifi cation: LCC DF230.A4 (ebook) | LCC DF230.A4 R6613 2019 (print) | DDC 938.05/092 [B]—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018059296 For Bernard de Fallois, as a token of gratitude and friendship Contents Translator’s Preface ix Author’s Preface xi Chronology xix 1. Richly Endowed 1 2. Insults and Scandals 15 First Interlude: Alcibiades between Two Lifestyles 31 3. Political Debut: The Argive Alliance 35 4. The Grand Design 52 5. The Scandals 70 6. Exile: Defending Treason 89 7. In Asia Minor 104 8. With the Athenians on Samos 123 viii Contents Second Interlude: Alcibiades between Two Historians 137 9. A Triumphal Return 141 10. Slightly More Than One Hundred Days 154 11. A Final Appearance 166 12. Repercussions 178 Conclusion 191 Index 201 Translator’s Preface Jacqueline de Romilly’s lifelong contributions to ancient Greek literature and history made her a major fi gure in French culture. In 1973 she became chair of Greek at the Collège de France, the fi rst woman nominated to this distinguished institution. In 1988, she was elected to the Académie Fran- çaise as its second female member. In her later years she became famous in France for her ardent advocacy of classical education for all. Romilly (1913–2010) was well known on both sides of the Atlantic as an intellec- tual and cultural critic and served as A. D. White Professor-at-Large at Cornell University from 1974 to1980. I was drawn to Romilly’s work in 2010, when I undertook the trans- lation of her seminal book Histoire et raison chez Thucydide , fi rst pub- lished in Paris in 1956. That study altered the course of scholarship on Thucydides’s history of the Peloponnesian War by revealing the au- thor’s rhetorical and literary artfulness, the means by which he refi ned and shaped the “facts” of history. The title chosen for my translation, The Mind of Thucydides (Cornell University Press, 2012), aptly captures Romilly’s purpose and achievement. x Translator’s Preface Alcibiades is a quite different kind of work, a biography of the mete- oric career of the egomaniacal fi gure who dominated Greek politics and the Peloponnesian War from 416 to 404 BCE. It is a product of Romilly’s superb scholarship and of her lifelong effort to acquaint the public with the pertinence of the ancient world to contemporary political and cultural life. To appeal to a wider audience, Romilly composed this book, which was published in Paris in 1995, in an informal style that would arrest attention and enable her readers to see Alcibiades’s charismatic personal- ity in full. She wanted her contemporaries to appreciate the dangers his singular character posed to Athens, Sparta, and Persia, all of which fell under his spell and granted him authoritative roles in their policymaking. Although this is a work of history, it often reads like a novel. But Romilly evinces her usual acumen and care in the research she con- ducted for this book. She plumbs and critiques the sources for Alcibiades’s life, including Thucydides, Plato, Andocides, Lysias, Xenophon, Isocrates, Plutarch, Athenaeus, and Diodorus. On the one hand, she reproduces from the later biographers numerous anecdotes from Alcibiades’s youth in order to paint his character, while acknowledging their historical unreli- ability; on the other hand, she critically evaluates the contemporary and more authentic portraits drawn by Thucydides and Plato, and accords them respect, but not complete credibility. Numerous footnotes disclose her sources to the reader, thus making her biography an unusual blend of erudition and accessibility. Romilly’s treatment of Alcibiades’s youthful insolence and arrogant disregard for social norms, and of his later athletic, fi nancial, and religious scandals, was informed by her perception of events in her native France in the mid-1990s. Several times she refers to contemporary scandals in French politics that mirror Alcibiades’s outrages in fi fth-century Greece. Her central lesson is that a charismatic, amoral, and narcissistic leader imposes enormous risks on a democratic state. Few commentators are as well qualifi ed as Romilly to warn of the public dangers inherent in such reckless individuals. To say that twenty-fi rst-century readers of this biog- raphy are likely to fi nd in it parallels to today’s political environment is to understate the case. Author’s Preface The life of Alcibiades is one of astonishing journeys and adventures. As a young man, he was adopted by Pericles and beloved by Socrates. He was at the center of all political activity at the end of the fi fth century BCE. Driven by ambition and endowed with uncommon abilities, he dominated politics fi rst in Athens, then in Sparta, then in the Persian satrapies. He experienced highs and lows worthy of a Greek tragedy. From a position of power over all of Athens, he was suddenly forced to fl ee from the city that had condemned him to death. He returned as a savior, honored and acclaimed, only to be exiled once again, and ultimately assassinated, by order of the state, in a village in upper Phrygia. Following him every- where, from city to city, from Sicily to Lydia, from one campaign to an- other, was the persistent whiff of scandal. Moreover, a colorful adventurer, he did not live in ordinary times. The Peloponnesian War, in which he played a leading role, was one of the most important turning points in Greek history. It had begun at a moment when Athens was at the very peak of power and infl uence. It ended in xii Author’s Preface utter defeat. Athens lost both its empire and fl eet, thus ending a century of tragic greatness and glory. Alcibiades had presided over all the impor- tant decisions, on both sides. He therefore bore, undeniably, responsibility for the disastrous results. And he died in the same year as Athens’ de- feat. It is as if, from every angle, his personal experience was interwoven with the crucial moments in Athenian history. It is for this reason, then, that he held the attention of and inspired contemplation by the greatest minds of his time. The names of Pericles and Socrates appear above in the opening lines for good reason: Pericles gave his name to the century, and Socrates was the founder of Western philosophy. Moreover, Alcibiades fi g- ures in the work of the greatest historian of the time, Thucydides, as well as works of Plato and Xenophon, the historical works and the memoirs on Socrates. Other authors contain allusions or references to Alcibiades, including Aristophanes and Euripides. Even after his death, the orators Isocrates and Lysias argued about the role and character of Alcibiades. There was, in fact, an Alcibiades problem. An orphan and the ward of Pericles, he seems to have pursued a political path contrary to that of his teacher. Over twenty-fi ve years, that change could be seen to correspond to the ruin of Athens. Was there a connection? And if so, what was it? Was it simply a generational issue of personality and temperament? Or was there a broader decline in civic purpose and morality in political af- fairs? And did this decline refl ect, or cause, a crisis in the democracy and its workings? If the latter hypothesis is correct, as was thought at the time, then it is of paramount interest to us and to all those who hold dear the idea of democracy. We might say that the life of Alcibiades brought out two political prob- lems that were apparent as early as the fi fth century and are still current in today’s world. First, his life embodied Athenian imperialism, in its most extreme and dominant form and in the lack of prudence that led to its ruin.
Recommended publications
  • Theopompos' Treatment of Cimon Connor, W Robert Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1963; 4, 2; Proquest Pg
    Theopompos' Treatment of Cimon Connor, W Robert Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1963; 4, 2; ProQuest pg. 107 Theopompos' Treatment of Cimon w. Robert Connor MOST A CENTURY AGO F. Ruhll first called attention to a E curious and difficult fragment of Theopompos2 in the Contra Iulianum of St. Cyril of Alexandria. The fragment, now printed as number 90 in Jacoby's collection, is an attack on the integrity of Cimon, the fifth-century Athenian general. Since Ruhl's discovery the fragment has received little serious discussion: it was omitted in the collections of Theopompos made by Schranz and by Grenfell and Hunt,3 only briefly discussed by Jacoby,4 applied to other Athen­ ians by Meyer and Wade-Gery,5 and dismissed by Ruhl himself as part of a "vollstandiges Lugensystem"6 developed by the Christian authors to denigrate paganism. More disconcerting is the failure of two important studies of Theopompos to consider the fragment. Both K. von Fritz and A. Momigliano accept the view that Theopompos gave his "permanent approval" to Cimon, "the old-time gentleman, brilliant in war as well as in society, a perfect aristocrat ... who was finally defeated ... 1 F. RUhl, Die Quellen Plutarchs im Leben des Kimcn (Marburg dissertation 1867). 2 FGrHist 115 F 90. It has been suggested to me that the large number of iambic feet in the fragment (infra page 108) may indicate that the fragment belongs to Theopompos the comic poet, not Theopompos the historian. The fragment, however, accords well with what is known of the digression on the demagogues in the Philippica, and has no obvious parallel among the fragments of the comedian.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Freed Athens? J
    Ancient Greek Democracy: Readings and Sources Edited by Eric W. Robinson Copyright © 2004 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd The Beginnings of the Athenian Democracv: Who Freed Athens? J Introduction Though the very earliest democracies lildy took shape elsewhere in Greece, Athens embraced it relatively early and would ultimately become the most famous and powerful democracy the ancient world ever hew. Democracy is usually thought to have taken hold among the Athenians with the constitutional reforms of Cleisthenes, ca. 508/7 BC. The tyrant Peisistratus and later his sons had ruled Athens for decades before they were overthrown; Cleisthenes, rallying the people to his cause, made sweeping changes. These included the creation of a representative council (bode)chosen from among the citizens, new public organizations that more closely tied citizens throughout Attica to the Athenian state, and the populist ostracism law that enabled citizens to exile danger- ous or undesirable politicians by vote. Beginning with these measures, and for the next two centuries or so with only the briefest of interruptions, democracy held sway at Athens. Such is the most common interpretation. But there is, in fact, much room for disagree- ment about when and how democracy came to Athens. Ancient authors sometimes refer to Solon, a lawgiver and mediator of the early sixth century, as the founder of the Athenian constitution. It was also a popular belief among the Athenians that two famous “tyrant-slayers,” Harmodius and Aristogeiton, inaugurated Athenian freedom by assas- sinating one of the sons of Peisistratus a few years before Cleisthenes’ reforms - though ancient writers take pains to point out that only the military intervention of Sparta truly ended the tyranny.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tradition of Ancient Greek Democracy and Its Importance for Modem Democracy
    DEMOCRAC AHMOKPATI The Tradition of Ancient Greek Democracy and its Importance for Modern Democracy Mogens Herman Hansen The Tradition of Ancient Greek Democracy and its Importance for Modem Democracy B y M ogens H erman H ansen Historisk-filosofiske Meddelelser 93 Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters Copenhagen 2005 Abstract The two studies printed here investigate to what extent there is a con­ nection between ancient and modem democracy. The first study treats the tradition of ancient Greek democracy, especially the tradition of Athenian democracy from ca. 1750 to the present day. It is argued that in ideology there is a remarkable resemblance between the Athenian democracy in the Classical period and the modem liberal democracy in the 19th and 20th centuries. On the other hand no direct tradition con­ nects modem liberal democracy with its ancient ancestor. Not one single Athenian institution has been copied by a modem democracy, and it is only from ca. 1850 onwards that the ideals cherished by the Athenian democrats were referred to approvingly by modem cham­ pions of democracy. It is in fact the IT technology and its potential for a return to a more direct form of democracy which has given rise to a hitherto unmatched interest in the Athenian democratic institutions. This is the topic of the second study in which it is argued that the focus of the contemporary interest is on the Athenian system of sortition and rotation rather than on the popular assembly. Contents The Tradition of Democracy from Antiquity to the Present Time .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy in Ancient Athens Was Different from What We Have in Canada Today
    54_ALB6SS_Ch3_F2 2/13/08 2:25 PM Page 54 CHAPTER Democracy in 3 Ancient Athens Take a long step 2500 years back in time. Imagine you are a boy living in the ancient city of Athens, Greece. Your slave, words matter! Cleandros [KLEE-an-thros], is walking you to school. Your father Ancient refers to something and a group of his friends hurry past talking loudly. They are on from a time more than their way to the Assembly. The Assembly is an important part of 2500 years ago. democratic government in Athens. All Athenian men who are citizens can take part in the Assembly. They debate issues of concern and vote on laws. As the son of a citizen, you look forward to being old enough to participate in the Assembly. The Birthplace of Democracy The ancient Greeks influenced how people today think about citizenship and rights. In Athens, a form of government developed in which the people participated. The democracy we enjoy in Canada had its roots in ancient Athens. ■ How did men who were citizens participate in the democratic government in Athens? ■ Did Athens have representative government? Explain. 54 54_ALB6SS_Ch3_F2 2/13/08 2:25 PM Page 55 “Watch Out for the Rope!” Cleandros takes you through the agora, a large, open area in the middle of the city. It is filled with market stalls and men shopping and talking. You notice a slave carrying a rope covered with red paint. He ? Inquiring Minds walks through the agora swinging the rope and marking the men’s clothing with paint.
    [Show full text]
  • De Theognide Megarensi. Nietzsche on Theognis of Megara. a Bilingual Edition
    FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE De Theognide Megarensi Nietzsche on Theognis of Megara – A Bilingual Edition – Translated by R. M. Kerr THE NIETZSCHE CHANNEL Friedrich Nietzsche De Theognide Megarensi Nietzsche on Theognis of Megara A bilingual edition Translated by R. M. Kerr ☙ editio electronica ❧ _________________________________________ THE N E T ! " # H E # H A N N E $ % MM&' Copyright © Proprietas interpretatoris Roberti Martini Kerrii anno 2015 Omnia proprietatis iura reservantur et vindicantur. Imitatio prohibita sine auctoris permissione. Non licet pecuniam expetere pro aliquo, quod partem horum verborum continet; liber pro omnibus semper gratuitus erat et manet. Sic rerum summa novatur semper, et inter se mortales mutua vivunt. augescunt aliae gentes, aliae invuntur, inque brevi spatio mutantur saecla animantum et quasi cursores vitai lampada tradiunt. - Lucretius - - de Rerum Natura, II 5-! - PR"#$CE %e &or' presente( here is a trans)ation o* #rie(rich Nietzsche-s aledi!tionsarbeit ./schoo) e0it-thesis12 *or the "andesschule #$orta in 3chu)p*orta .3axony-$nhalt) presente( on 3epte4ber th 15678 It has hitherto )arge)y gone unnotice(, especial)y in anglophone Nietzsche stu(- ies8 $t the ti4e though, the &or' he)pe( to estab)ish the reputation o* the then twenty year o)( Nietzsche and consi(erab)y *aci)itate( his )ater acade4ic career8 9y a)) accounts, it &as a consi(erab)e achie:e4ent, especial)y consi(ering &hen it &as &ri;en: it entai)e( an e0pert 'no&)e(ge, not =ust o* c)assical-phi)o)ogical )iterature, but also o* co(ico)ogy8 %e recent =u(ge4ent by >"+3"+ .2017<!!2< “It is a piece that, ha( Nietzsche ne:er &ri;en another &or(, &ou)( ha:e assure( his p)ace, albeit @uite a s4a)) one, in the history o* Ger4an phi)o)ogyB su4s the 4atter up quite e)o@uently8 +ietzsche )ater continue( his %eognis stu(ies, the sub=ect o* his Crst scho)ar)y artic)e, as a stu(ent at Leip,ig, in 156 D to so4e e0tent a su44ary o* the present &or' D a critical re:ie& in 156!, as &e)) as @uotes in se:eral )e;ers *ro4 1567 on.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis 2–3 and Alcibiades's Speech in Plato's Symposium: a Cultural
    Page 1 of 6 Original Research Genesis 2–3 and Alcibiades’s speech in Plato’s Symposium: A cultural critical reading Author: The purpose of this article is to discuss some basic problems and methodological steps 1,2 Evangelia G. Dafni concerning the encounter between Hebrews and Greeks in the Classical period and its impact Affiliations: on the Hellenistic era. The relationship between the Old Testament and Ancient Greek 1Department of Ecclesiastical literature will be examined on the basis of Genesis 2–3 and Alcibiades’s speech in Plato’s and Social Theology, Faculty Symposium (212c–223d). The following considerations and models of interpretation can arise of Theology, Aristotle from the analysis of Alcibiades’s speech compared to M- and LXX-Genesis 2–3: (1) Ancient University of Thessaloniki, Greece Greek writers were familiar with Old Testament oral or written traditions through improvised translations. They prepared the way for the LXX and, in their compositions, were in dispute 2Department of Old with them although they do not make specific references to the Hebrews and their literature; Testament Studies, Faculty (2) Hebrew authors knew the works of Ancient Greek authors and used Greek philosophical of Theology, University of Pretoria, South Africa terminology which they creatively adapted to Semitic models; (3) Both models are possible. One should not rush to any decisions but examine each case individually, in the original Note: language. Professor Evangelia Dafni is a Research Associate of Professor Dirk Human in the Department of Old Testament Introduction Studies at the Faculty of Genesis 2–3 is of central importance for the anthropology of the Old Testament: It describes in Theology, University of Pretoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaic Eretria
    ARCHAIC ERETRIA This book presents for the first time a history of Eretria during the Archaic Era, the city’s most notable period of political importance. Keith Walker examines all the major elements of the city’s success. One of the key factors explored is Eretria’s role as a pioneer coloniser in both the Levant and the West— its early Aegean ‘island empire’ anticipates that of Athens by more than a century, and Eretrian shipping and trade was similarly widespread. We are shown how the strength of the navy conferred thalassocratic status on the city between 506 and 490 BC, and that the importance of its rowers (Eretria means ‘the rowing city’) probably explains the appearance of its democratic constitution. Walker dates this to the last decade of the sixth century; given the presence of Athenian political exiles there, this may well have provided a model for the later reforms of Kleisthenes in Athens. Eretria’s major, indeed dominant, role in the events of central Greece in the last half of the sixth century, and in the events of the Ionian Revolt to 490, is clearly demonstrated, and the tyranny of Diagoras (c. 538–509), perhaps the golden age of the city, is fully examined. Full documentation of literary, epigraphic and archaeological sources (most of which have previously been inaccessible to an English-speaking audience) is provided, creating a fascinating history and a valuable resource for the Greek historian. Keith Walker is a Research Associate in the Department of Classics, History and Religion at the University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Family Connection of Alcibiades and Axiochus , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:2 (1986:Summer) P.173
    STANLEY, PHILLIP V., The Family Connection of Alcibiades and Axiochus , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:2 (1986:Summer) p.173 The Family Connection of Alcibiades and Axiochus Phillip V. Stanley LTHOUGH THE ANCESTRY of the Athenian general Alcibiades A III remains obscure for the sixth century, his genealogy is as­ sumed to be secure for the fifth. The descent of the family from Alcibiades I to Alcibiades IV has been reconstructed by Vander­ pool in the following way:l Alcibiades J2 I Cleinias I I Alcibiades II I I Axiochus Cleinias II I I I I Cleinias III Alcibiades III Cleinias IV I Alcibiades IV I E. Vanderpool, "The Ostracism of the Elder Alcibiades," Hesperia 21 (I952) 1-8, esp. 6. Cr. M. B. Wallace, "Early Greek Proxenoi," Phoenix 24 (I 970) 196f; 1. K. DAVIES, Athenian Propertied Families (Oxford 1971 [hereafter APF)) 10-12. According to Isoc. 16.25f (delivered by Alcibiades IV, son of the general), Alcibiades I, the ally of Cleisthenes when he expelled Hippias from Athens, was the great-grandfather (1TpO- 1Ta1T1To~) of Alcibiades III. The general difficulty stems from the apparent need to reduce the number of generations separating Alcibiades I from Alcibiades III, believed to be five: if the number is not reduced, Alcibiades I would actually be the great-great­ grandfather of the general. 2 Roman numerals are those assigned in PA and APF. These numerals will continue to be used even when homonyms are added to the family's genealogy. In order to avoid the confusion that might result if a major overhaul of the numerical system for this family were attempted, and to preserve the numerical descent established for the branch of the family to which Alcibiades III belongs, the newly identified individual will be assigned the next available Roman numeral, even though he may be earlier than an individual with the same name whose number is lower.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Athenian Democracy.Pdf
    Rethinking Athenian Democracy A dissertation presented by Daniela Louise Cammack to The Department of Government in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Political Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts January 2013 © 2013 Daniela Cammack All rights reserved. Professor Richard Tuck Daniela Cammack Abstract Conventional accounts of classical Athenian democracy represent the assembly as the primary democratic institution in the Athenian political system. This looks reasonable in the light of modern democracy, which has typically developed through the democratization of legislative assemblies. Yet it conflicts with the evidence at our disposal. Our ancient sources suggest that the most significant and distinctively democratic institution in Athens was the courts, where decisions were made by large panels of randomly selected ordinary citizens with no possibility of appeal. This dissertation reinterprets Athenian democracy as “dikastic democracy” (from the Greek dikastēs, “judge”), defined as a mode of government in which ordinary citizens rule principally through their control of the administration of justice. It begins by casting doubt on two major planks in the modern interpretation of Athenian democracy: first, that it rested on a conception of the “wisdom of the multitude” akin to that advanced by epistemic democrats today, and second that it was “deliberative,” meaning that mass discussion of political matters played a defining role. The first plank rests largely on an argument made by Aristotle in support of mass political participation, which I show has been comprehensively misunderstood. The second rests on the interpretation of the verb “bouleuomai” as indicating speech, but I suggest that it meant internal reflection in both the courts and the assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics and Policy in Corinth 421-336 B.C. Dissertation
    POLITICS AND POLICY IN CORINTH 421-336 B.C. DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by DONALD KAGAN, B.A., A.M. The Ohio State University 1958 Approved by: Adviser Department of History TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD ................................................. 1 CHAPTER I THE LEGACY OF ARCHAIC C O R I N T H ....................7 II CORINTHIAN DIPLOMACY AFTER THE PEACE OF NICIAS . 31 III THE DECLINE OF CORINTHIAN P O W E R .................58 IV REVOLUTION AND UNION WITH ARGOS , ................ 78 V ARISTOCRACY, TYRANNY AND THE END OF CORINTHIAN INDEPENDENCE ............... 100 APPENDIXES .............................................. 135 INDEX OF PERSONAL N A M E S ................................. 143 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................... 145 AUTOBIOGRAPHY ........................................... 149 11 FOREWORD When one considers the important role played by Corinth in Greek affairs from the earliest times to the end of Greek freedom it is remarkable to note the paucity of monographic literature on this key city. This is particular­ ly true for the classical period wnere the sources are few and scattered. For the archaic period the situation has been somewhat better. One of the first attempts toward the study of Corinthian 1 history was made in 1876 by Ernst Curtius. This brief art­ icle had no pretensions to a thorough investigation of the subject, merely suggesting lines of inquiry and stressing the importance of numisihatic evidence. A contribution of 2 similar score was undertaken by Erich Wilisch in a brief discussion suggesting some of the problems and possible solutions. This was followed by a second brief discussion 3 by the same author.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcibiades: Why the Politically Ambitious Cannot Be Educated to Philosophic Virtue
    Honors Thesis Topic: Alcibiades: Why the Politically Ambitious cannot be Educated to Philosophic Virtue By Tori Nickol Professor: Dr. Parsons i 2 Abstract In the Alcibiades I dialogue, Socrates attempts to educate the extremely ambitious and beautiful Alcibiades to a life of philosophic virtue. Despite this education, Alcibiades proceeds to a life of infamy and tyrannical aspirations, which prompts one to ask the question: what are the limits of a political individual in a philosophic life, and vice versa? Ultimately, an examination of the Alcibiades I dialogue reveals that political types generally fail as philosophers because they are dependent on the city for enabling their ignorance. Philosophers, by contrast, cannot be political men because they are too focused on the development of the individual as opposed to the growth of the city. It is this emphasis on the individual that leads Socrates to attempt an education of Alcibiades (despite being aware of the dangers such an education may hold for the city)—promising, ambitious individuals ought to be educated in the hopes that they may become the best men, even if such a risk comes at the cost of an entire city. 3 Introduction Alcibiades is perhaps the most infamous traitor in Athenian history, but before achieving notoriety, Alcibiades was recognized as one of Athens’ most talented and ambitious youths. With great political aspirations in mind, Alcibiades is intercepted by Socrates before he can speak to the Athenian assembly. After talking with Socrates in the Alcibiades I, Alcibiades seems turned to a Socratic education, an education Socrates promises will aid Alcibiades in his political pursuits.
    [Show full text]