DOCSLIB.ORG

What If String Theory Is If It Is, Then Dark Matter, Dark Energy, WRONG? and Cosmic Inflation Are in Big Trouble

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What If String Theory Is If It Is, Then Dark Matter, Dark Energy, WRONG? and Cosmic Inflation Are in Big Trouble What if string theory is If it is, then dark matter, dark energy, WRONG? and cosmic inflation are in big trouble. ⁄⁄⁄ BY STEN ODENWALD cientists pin their hopes of unifying nature’s fundamen- tal forces to a single concept crafted over the course of 3 decades by thousands of mathematicians and physicists. It’s calledS superstring theory. Its basic ingredients are one-dimensional strings of pure energy that exist in a 10-dimensional universe, four of which are our familiar spatial dimensions plus time. Strings’ vibration and movement create the fabric of space itself, along with all of nature’s fundamental forces and elementary particles. Now, imagine a future in which physicists are delivered the bad news: irrefutable data proving superstring the- ory doesn’t work in our physical world. We’re IF CURRENT THEORIES about supersymmetry are correct, every elementary particle has a nowhere near such a crisis today, but it’s sober- massive superpartner not yet detected. Scien- ing to realize what we stand to lose if tists hope to detect some of these particles using the Large Hadron Collider, which smashes physics’ best bet proves to be a atomic nuclei to liberate the fundamental complete dead end. constituents of matter. DON DIXON FOR ASTRONOMY © 2015 Kalmbach Publishing Co. This material may not be reproduced in any 78 Cosmology’s Greatestform without Discoveries permission from ⁄⁄⁄ the 2009 publisher. www.Astronomy.com www.Astronomy.com 79 Cosmic constituents National Accelerator Laboratory in Bata- In some respects, a world without super- STRING SPEAK via, Illinois. “That’s why we’re so excited string theory isn’t so bad. The standard Atoms about looking for them.” model and ordinary general relativity hold GENERAL RELATIVITY 5 percent Albert Einstein’s formulation of grav- If scientists validate superstring theory, that all astronomers need to describe accu- ity, which shows that space and time rately most of the phenomena they study, we’ll see the birth of the first unified communicate the gravitational force Dark energy description of the physical world. Along the from galaxy evolution and supernova deto- 72 percent through their curvature. way, we’ll have to make peace with the idea nations to the extreme physics of neutron of a multiverse in which trillions of other stars and black holes. GLUON universes may exist, each with its own nat- As for unification, the late physicist Rich- The smallest bundle of the strong ural laws, forces, and particles. ard Feynman once said, “Perhaps it is dif- nuclear force, which holds atomic Dark matter But what would happen if all these ficult for physicists to unify gravity with the nuclei together. 23 percent ideas are wrong? String theory would go other forces because nature never intended down in history as the most spectacular for them to be unified in the first place.” QUANTUM MECHANICS wrong turn science has ever taken. It will Laws governing the universe on sub- atomic scales in which uncertainty and have sent thousands of physicists on a Cosmic trouble SCIENTISTS AT CERN will use the Large Hadron Collider’s ATLAS detector to smash COSMOLOGISTS’ best tally of cosmic the dual nature of waves and particles spectacular wild-goose chase, while simul- Astronomers have also discovered there is together high-velocity proton beams. The resulting subatomic debris should reveal funda- content comes from NASA’s Wilkinson become apparent. taneously revolutionizing obscure subjects far more to the universe than what we can mental particle processes. The ATLAS experiment is one of the largest collaborative efforts Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP). ever attempted in the physical sciences. The project involves 2,500 physicists from 169 Normal matter accounts for only about in pure mathematics. see. The standard model has absolutely no STANDARD MODEL institutions in 37 countries. CERN/CLAUDIA MARCELLONI 5 percent of the total. ASTRONOMY: ROEN KELLY place in it for dark matter and dark energy, A theory of interactions of nature’s Forget supersymmetry? ingredients that constitute 95 percent of the most fundamental known particles If extra dimensions don’t exist, universe’s gravitating “stuff.” (e.g., electrons and quarks) developed Extra dimensions ing into a gluon. Luckily, other ways to properties as they move through our three- then supersymmetry doesn’t And it gets worse. in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Its Superstring theory is based on three key search for supersymmetry exist. dimensional world. There are trillions of either. Without both of Without supersym- inability to explain gravity suggests a ideas that remain experimentally unproven If nature follows supersymmetry, then possible six-dimensional geometries, each these cornerstones of LITERALLY metry, some physicists more fundamental theory exists. after 30 years of research: the principle of every normal particle has a superpartner: calling into existence a unique universe string theory, physi- have proven that the STRING THEORY supersymmetry, additional spatial dimen- Electrons partner with “selectrons,” pho- with specific physical laws, particles, and cists would be left trillions of possible energy of empty A unified theory of the universe postu- sions, and gravity as a force defined by the tons with “photinos,” quarks with “squarks,” forces. Which one is ours? with what they space would be so six-dimensional geom- lating that the fundamental ingredi- exchange of quantum particles. and so on. These superpartners haven’t Some researchers feel all geometric pos- refer to as the enormous that the ents of nature are not particles but Supersymmetry is a mathematical prin- been seen yet, but scientists built a new sibilities exist in the multiverse — the col- standard model. etries exist, each calling universe would one-dimensional filaments called ciple that allows force-carrying particles, accelerator, the Large Hadron Collider lection of all possible universes with all The standard instantly collapse. strings. String theory unites quantum such as photons and gluons, to transform (LHC), at the European Organization for possible physical laws logically allowed by model combines into existence a unique Only by under- mechanics and general relativity, into one another. It also allows the unifica- Nuclear Research (CERN) in Switzerland to superstring theory. Ours, then, is a Goldi- electroweak theory universe. Which one standing physics which are otherwise incompatible; tion of gravity with other forces because its find them. Researchers hope experiments locks Universe, where exactly the right six- (EW) — itself a com- beyond the standard often short for superstring theory. particle, which some call the graviton, can with the LHC will turn up at least a few of dimensional geometry allows the existence bination of electromag- is ours? model can we hope to transform into one of the other force- the lightest superparticles. Such a success of life as we know it. There may be 10100 netism and the weak understand how the vac- carriers. Although this idea is mathemati- would be a prelude to confirming the most universes that fail this challenge. There may nuclear force — with a sepa- uum and the universe’s dark Dimensions cally elegant, and puts gravity on an equal bizarre physics idea of the last 80 years — be others in which new, unthinkable pos- rate theory of the strong nuclear side work. And only string the- footing with the other forces, no one has extra dimensions to space. sibilities for life could flourish. force called quantum chromodynamics ory appears able to serve as a reliable math- to spare ever detected, for example, a photon turn- If extra dimensions really exist, they’ll (QCD). Each part behaves like a train on a ematical guide to that larger universe. Space-time is just the start change the behavior of gravity at small dis- separate track. But just as electricity and Another major disaster to astronomy Identity change Conventional superstring theory requires tances. In 2003, John Price of the University magnetism were unified into electromagne- would be in our understanding of the larg- extra dimensions to space beyond the usual of Colorado at Boulder and his colleagues tism, the standard model’s EW and QCD est structures in the universe and the uni- three (up-down, left-right, near-far). These announced an ultra-precise measurement are so similar that they, too, must be unified. verse’s large-scale smoothness revealed by additional dimensions give physicists extra of gravity at scales of one-tenth of a mil- Grand unification theories (GUTs) tried studies of the cosmic microwave back- “handles” from which they can fashion limeter. The team saw no departure from to do just this. Physicists worked with doz- ground (CMB). not just an improved theory of gravity gravity’s inverse-square law, in which the ens of prospects between 1975 and 1980; Inflation, a super-fast but the properties of the known par- force of attraction decreases by the square most failed. Many predicted the proton, the expansion of the uni- ticles themselves. Vastly smaller of the distance between bodies. So, the hunt foundation of atomic nuclei, would rapidly verse when it was than a proton, the extra dimen- resumes below this limit to test other extra- decay; some introduced faster-than-light less than a trillionth sions appear as six additional dimensional possibilities. tachyons as new physical particles. of a trillionth of a Width Distance Six additional spatial dimensions coordinates attached to “We have a number of hints from None turned out to work very well once second old, explains each point in space. experiments and theoretical ideas that physicists puzzled out their intricate math- observations of the Height EVERY POINT They actually form make us think they’re probably out there,” ematics and compared them to the real CMB made by satel- in our universe’s Photon their own closed, six- says Joseph Lykken, a physicist at Fermi world.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Is the Universe Expanding?: an Historical and Philosophical Perspective for Cosmologists Starting Anew
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 6-1996 Is the Universe Expanding?: An Historical and Philosophical Perspective for Cosmologists Starting Anew David A. Vlosak Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Cosmology, Relativity, and Gravity Commons Recommended Citation Vlosak, David A., "Is the Universe Expanding?: An Historical and Philosophical Perspective for Cosmologists Starting Anew" (1996). Master's Theses. 3474. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3474 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IS THEUN IVERSE EXPANDING?: AN HISTORICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVE FOR COSMOLOGISTS STAR TING ANEW by David A Vlasak A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements forthe Degree of Master of Arts Department of Philosophy Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 1996 IS THE UNIVERSE EXPANDING?: AN HISTORICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVE FOR COSMOLOGISTS STARTING ANEW David A Vlasak, M.A. Western Michigan University, 1996 This study addresses the problem of how scientists ought to go about resolving the current crisis in big bang cosmology. Although this problem can be addressed by scientists themselves at the level of their own practice, this study addresses it at the meta­ level by using the resources offered by philosophy of science. There are two ways to resolve the current crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaluza-Klein Gravity, Concentrating on the General Rel- Ativity, Rather Than Particle Physics Side of the Subject
    Kaluza-Klein Gravity J. M. Overduin Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3055, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8W 3P6 and P. S. Wesson Department of Physics, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1 and Gravity Probe-B, Hansen Physics Laboratories, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A. 94305 Abstract We review higher-dimensional unified theories from the general relativity, rather than the particle physics side. Three distinct approaches to the subject are identi- fied and contrasted: compactified, projective and noncompactified. We discuss the cosmological and astrophysical implications of extra dimensions, and conclude that none of the three approaches can be ruled out on observational grounds at the present time. arXiv:gr-qc/9805018v1 7 May 1998 Preprint submitted to Elsevier Preprint 3 February 2008 1 Introduction Kaluza’s [1] achievement was to show that five-dimensional general relativity contains both Einstein’s four-dimensional theory of gravity and Maxwell’s the- ory of electromagnetism. He however imposed a somewhat artificial restriction (the cylinder condition) on the coordinates, essentially barring the fifth one a priori from making a direct appearance in the laws of physics. Klein’s [2] con- tribution was to make this restriction less artificial by suggesting a plausible physical basis for it in compactification of the fifth dimension. This idea was enthusiastically received by unified-field theorists, and when the time came to include the strong and weak forces by extending Kaluza’s mechanism to higher dimensions, it was assumed that these too would be compact. This line of thinking has led through eleven-dimensional supergravity theories in the 1980s to the current favorite contenders for a possible “theory of everything,” ten-dimensional superstrings.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Infrared Background and Early Galaxy Evolution
    Cosmic Infrared Background and Early Galaxy Evolution A. Kashlinsky Laboratory for Astronomy and Solar Physics, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, and SSAI e-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT The Cosmic Infrared Background (CIB) reflects the sum total of galactic luminosi- ties integrated over the entire age of the universe. From its measurement the red-shifted starlight and dust-absorbed and re-radiated starlight of the CIB can be used to deter- mine (or constrain) the rates of star formation and metal production as a function of time and deduce information about objects at epochs currently inaccessible to telescopic studies. This review discusses the state of current CIB measurements and the (mostly space-based) instruments with which these measurements have been made, the obstacles (the various foreground emissions) and the physics behind the CIB and its structure. Theoretical discussion of the CIB levels can now be normalized to the standard cos- mological model narrowing down theoretical uncertainties. We review the information behind and theoretical modeling of both the mean (isotropic) levels of the CIB and their fluctuations. The CIB is divided into three broad bands: near-IR, mid-IR and far-IR. For each of the bands we review the main contributors to the CIB flux and the epochs at which the bulk of the flux originates. We also discuss the data on the various quanti- ties relevant for correct interpretation of the CIB levels: the star-formation history, the present-day luminosity function measurements, resolving the various galaxy contribu- tors to the CIB, etc. The integrated light of all galaxies in the deepest near-IR galaxy counts to date fails to match the observed mean level of the CIB, probably indicating arXiv:astro-ph/0412235v1 9 Dec 2004 a significant high-redshift contribution to the CIB.
    [Show full text]
  • From Vibrating Strings to a Unified Theory of All Interactions
    Barton Zwiebach From Vibrating Strings to a Unified Theory of All Interactions or the last twenty years, physicists have investigated F String Theory rather vigorously. The theory has revealed an unusual depth. As a result, despite much progress in our under- standing of its remarkable properties, basic features of the theory remain a mystery. This extended period of activity is, in fact, the second period of activity in string theory. When it was first discov- ered in the late 1960s, string theory attempted to describe strongly interacting particles. Along came Quantum Chromodynamics— a theoryof quarks and gluons—and despite their early promise, strings faded away. This time string theory is a credible candidate for a theoryof all interactions—a unified theoryof all forces and matter. The greatest complication that frustrated the search for such a unified theorywas the incompatibility between two pillars of twen- tieth century physics: Einstein’s General Theoryof Relativity and the principles of Quantum Mechanics. String theory appears to be 30 ) zwiebach mit physics annual 2004 the long-sought quantum mechani- cal theory of gravity and other interactions. It is almost certain that string theory is a consistent theory. It is less certain that it describes our real world. Nevertheless, intense work has demonstrated that string theory incorporates many features of the physical universe. It is reasonable to be very optimistic about the prospects of string theory. Perhaps one of the most impressive features of string theory is the appearance of gravity as one of the fluctuation modes of a closed string. Although it was not discov- ered exactly in this way, we can describe a logical path that leads to the discovery of gravity in string theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Duality Symmetries Between Photons and Cosmic String Loops, and Macro and Micro Black Holes
    Symmetry 2015, 7, 2134-2149; doi:10.3390/sym7042134 OPEN ACCESS symmetry ISSN 2073-8994 www.mdpi.com/journal/symmetry Article Three Duality Symmetries between Photons and Cosmic String Loops, and Macro and Micro Black Holes David Jou 1;2;*, Michele Sciacca 1;3;4;* and Maria Stella Mongiovì 4;5 1 Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain 2 Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Carme 47, Barcelona 08001, Spain 3 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, Università di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Palermo 90128, Italy 4 Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica, Roma 00185 , Italy 5 Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, Gestionale, Informatica, Meccanica (DICGIM), Università di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Palermo 90128, Italy; E-Mail: [email protected] * Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: [email protected] (D.J.); [email protected] (M.S.); Tel.: +34-93-581-1658 (D.J.); +39-091-23897084 (M.S.). Academic Editor: Sergei Odintsov Received: 22 September 2015 / Accepted: 9 November 2015 / Published: 17 November 2015 Abstract: We present a review of two thermal duality symmetries between two different kinds of systems: photons and cosmic string loops, and macro black holes and micro black holes, respectively. It also follows a third joint duality symmetry amongst them through thermal equilibrium and stability between macro black holes and photon gas, and micro black holes and string loop gas, respectively. The possible cosmological consequences of these symmetries are discussed. Keywords: photons; cosmic string loops; black holes thermodynamics; duality symmetry 1. Introduction Thermal duality relates high-energy and low-energy states of corresponding dual systems in such a way that the thermal properties of a state of one of them at some temperature T are related to the properties of a state of the other system at temperature 1=T [1–6].
    [Show full text]
  • Spacetime Geometry from Graviton Condensation: a New Perspective on Black Holes
    Spacetime Geometry from Graviton Condensation: A new Perspective on Black Holes Sophia Zielinski née Müller München 2015 Spacetime Geometry from Graviton Condensation: A new Perspective on Black Holes Sophia Zielinski née Müller Dissertation an der Fakultät für Physik der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität München vorgelegt von Sophia Zielinski geb. Müller aus Stuttgart München, den 18. Dezember 2015 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Stefan Hofmann Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Georgi Dvali Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 13. April 2016 Contents Zusammenfassung ix Abstract xi Introduction 1 Naturalness problems . .1 The hierarchy problem . .1 The strong CP problem . .2 The cosmological constant problem . .3 Problems of gravity ... .3 ... in the UV . .4 ... in the IR and in general . .5 Outline . .7 I The classical description of spacetime geometry 9 1 The problem of singularities 11 1.1 Singularities in GR vs. other gauge theories . 11 1.2 Defining spacetime singularities . 12 1.3 On the singularity theorems . 13 1.3.1 Energy conditions and the Raychaudhuri equation . 13 1.3.2 Causality conditions . 15 1.3.3 Initial and boundary conditions . 16 1.3.4 Outlining the proof of the Hawking-Penrose theorem . 16 1.3.5 Discussion on the Hawking-Penrose theorem . 17 1.4 Limitations of singularity forecasts . 17 2 Towards a quantum theoretical probing of classical black holes 19 2.1 Defining quantum mechanical singularities . 19 2.1.1 Checking for quantum mechanical singularities in an example spacetime . 21 2.2 Extending the singularity analysis to quantum field theory . 22 2.2.1 Schrödinger representation of quantum field theory . 23 2.2.2 Quantum field probes of black hole singularities .
    [Show full text]
  • The Anthropic Principle and Multiple Universe Hypotheses Oren Kreps
    The Anthropic Principle and Multiple Universe Hypotheses Oren Kreps Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1: The Fine-Tuning Argument and the Anthropic Principle .............................................. 3 The Improbability of a Life-Sustaining Universe ....................................................................... 3 Does God Explain Fine-Tuning? ................................................................................................ 4 The Anthropic Principle .............................................................................................................. 7 The Multiverse Premise ............................................................................................................ 10 Three Classes of Coincidence ................................................................................................... 13 Can The Existence of Sapient Life Justify the Multiverse? ...................................................... 16 How unlikely is fine-tuning? .................................................................................................... 17 Section 2: Multiverse Theories ..................................................................................................... 18 Many universes or all possible
    [Show full text]
  • The Multiverse: Conjecture, Proof, and Science
    The multiverse: conjecture, proof, and science George Ellis Talk at Nicolai Fest Golm 2012 Does the Multiverse Really Exist ? Scientific American: July 2011 1 The idea The idea of a multiverse -- an ensemble of universes or of universe domains – has received increasing attention in cosmology - separate places [Vilenkin, Linde, Guth] - separate times [Smolin, cyclic universes] - the Everett quantum multi-universe: other branches of the wavefunction [Deutsch] - the cosmic landscape of string theory, imbedded in a chaotic cosmology [Susskind] - totally disjoint [Sciama, Tegmark] 2 Our Cosmic Habitat Martin Rees Rees explores the notion that our universe is just a part of a vast ''multiverse,'' or ensemble of universes, in which most of the other universes are lifeless. What we call the laws of nature would then be no more than local bylaws, imposed in the aftermath of our own Big Bang. In this scenario, our cosmic habitat would be a special, possibly unique universe where the prevailing laws of physics allowed life to emerge. 3 Scientific American May 2003 issue COSMOLOGY “Parallel Universes: Not just a staple of science fiction, other universes are a direct implication of cosmological observations” By Max Tegmark 4 Brian Greene: The Hidden Reality Parallel Universes and The Deep Laws of the Cosmos 5 Varieties of Multiverse Brian Greene (The Hidden Reality) advocates nine different types of multiverse: 1. Invisible parts of our universe 2. Chaotic inflation 3. Brane worlds 4. Cyclic universes 5. Landscape of string theory 6. Branches of the Quantum mechanics wave function 7. Holographic projections 8. Computer simulations 9. All that can exist must exist – “grandest of all multiverses” They can’t all be true! – they conflict with each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to String Theory A.N
    Introduction to String Theory A.N. Schellekens Based on lectures given at the Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen Last update 6 July 2016 [Word cloud by www.worldle.net] Contents 1 Current Problems in Particle Physics7 1.1 Problems of Quantum Gravity.........................9 1.2 String Diagrams................................. 11 2 Bosonic String Action 15 2.1 The Relativistic Point Particle......................... 15 2.2 The Nambu-Goto action............................ 16 2.3 The Free Boson Action............................. 16 2.4 World sheet versus Space-time......................... 18 2.5 Symmetries................................... 19 2.6 Conformal Gauge................................ 20 2.7 The Equations of Motion............................ 21 2.8 Conformal Invariance.............................. 22 3 String Spectra 24 3.1 Mode Expansion................................ 24 3.1.1 Closed Strings.............................. 24 3.1.2 Open String Boundary Conditions................... 25 3.1.3 Open String Mode Expansion..................... 26 3.1.4 Open versus Closed........................... 26 3.2 Quantization.................................. 26 3.3 Negative Norm States............................. 27 3.4 Constraints................................... 28 3.5 Mode Expansion of the Constraints...................... 28 3.6 The Virasoro Constraints............................ 29 3.7 Operator Ordering............................... 30 3.8 Commutators of Constraints.......................... 31 3.9 Computation of the Central Charge.....................
    [Show full text]
  • " All That Matter... in One Big Bang...," & Other Cosmological Singularities
    “All that matter ... in one Big Bang ...,” & other cosmological singularities∗ Emilio Elizalde 1,2,3,† 1 Spanish National Higher Council for Scientific Research, ICE/CSIC and IEEC Campus UAB, C/ Can Magrans s/n, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona) Spain 2 International Laboratory for Theoretical Cosmology, TUSUR University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia 3 Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan e-mail: [email protected] February 23, 2018 Abstract The first part of this paper contains a brief description of the beginnings of modern cosmology, which, the author will argue, was most likely born in the Year 1912. Some of the pieces of evidence presented here have emerged from recent research in the history of science, and are not usually shared with the general audiences in popular science books. In special, the issue of the correct formulation of the original Big Bang concept, according to the precise words of Fred Hoyle, is discussed. Too often, this point is very deficiently explained (when not just misleadingly) in most of the available generalist literature. Other frequent uses of the same words, Big Bang, as to name the initial singularity of the cosmos, and also whole cosmological models, are then addressed, as evolutions of its original meaning. Quantum and inflationary additions to the celebrated singular- ity theorems by Penrose, Geroch, Hawking and others led to subsequent results by Borde, Guth and Vilenkin. And corresponding corrections to the Einstein field equations have originated, in particular, R2, f(R), and scalar-tensor gravities, giving rise to a plethora of new singularities. For completeness, an updated table with a classification of the same is given.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPERSYMMETRIC UNIFICATION Savas Dimopoulos+
    CERN-TH.7531/94 ) SUPERSYMMETRIC UNIFICATION +) Savas Dimop oulos Theoretical Physics Division, CERN CH - 1211 Geneva23 ABSTRACT The measured value of the weak mixing angle is, at present, the only precise exp erimental indication for physics b eyond the Standard Mo del. It p oints in the direction of Uni ed Theo- ries with Sup ersymmetric particles at accessible energies. We recall the ideas that led to the construction of these theories in 1981. Talk presented at the International Conference on the History of Original Ideas and Basic Discoveries in Particle Physics held at Ettore Ma jorana Centre for Scienti c Culture, Erice, Sicily, July 29-Aug.4 1994. CERN-TH.7531/94 Decemb er 1994 1 Why Sup ersymmetric Uni cation? It is a pleasure to recall the ideas that led to the rst Sup ersymmetric Uni ed Theory and its low energy manifestation, the Sup ersymmetric SU (3) SU (2) U (1) mo del. This theory synthesizes two marvelous ideas, Uni cation [1] and Sup ersymmetry [2, 3 ]. The synthesis is catalyzed by the hierarchy problem [4] which suggests that Sup ersymmetry o ccurs at accessible energies [5]. Since time is short and we are explicitly asked to talk ab out our own contributions I will not cover these imp ortant topics. A lo ok at the the program of this Conference reveals that most other topics covered are textb o ok sub jects, such as Renormalization of the Standard Mo del [6] and Asymptotic Free- dom [7], that are at the foundation of our eld. So it is natural to ask why Sup ersymmetric Uni cation is included in such a distinguished companyofwell-established sub jects? I am not certain.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download the Black Hole War : My Battle with Stephen Hawking To
    THE BLACK HOLE WAR : MY BATTLE WITH STEPHEN HAWKING TO MAKE THE WORLD SAFE FOR QUANTUM MECHANICS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Leonard Susskind | 480 pages | 05 Nov 2009 | Little, Brown & Company | 9780316016414 | English | New York, United States The Black Hole War : My Battle with Stephen Hawking to Make the World Safe for Quantum Mechanics PDF Book Black Holes and Quantum Physics. Softcover edition. Most scientists didn't recognize the import of Hawking's claims, but Leonard Susskind and Gerard t'Hooft realized the threat, and responded with a counterattack that changed the course of physics. Please follow the detailed Help center instructions to transfer the files to supported eReaders. The Black Hole War is the thrilling story of their united effort to reconcile Hawking's theories of black holes with their own sense of reality, an effort that would eventually result in Hawking admitting he was wrong and Susskind and 't Hooft realizing that our world is a hologram projected from the outer boundaries of space. This is the inside account of the battle over the true nature of black holes—with nothing less than our understanding of the entire universe at stake. From the bestselling author of The White Donkey, a heartbreaking and visceral graphic novel set against the stark beauty of Afghanistan's mountain villages that examines prejudice and the military remnants of colonialism. Most scientists didn't recognize the import of Hawking's claims, but Leonard Susskind and Gerard t'Hooft realized the threat, and responded with a counterattack that changed the course of physics. But really, unlike it sounds, this means that information, or characteristics of an object, must always be preserved according to classical physics theory.
    [Show full text]