DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrating Th E Shoreline Into Spatial Policies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrating Th E Shoreline Into Spatial Policies INTEGRATING THE SHORELINE INTO SPATIAL POLICIES IGN France International Isle of Wight Council University of Szczecin Community of Agglomeration for the Thau Basin Municipality of Rewal August 2006 Project part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) within the INTERREG IIIC Programme MESSINA Practical Guide Integrating the Shoreline into Spatial Policies The MESSINA initiative The intensification of population migration towards the coast and increased frequency of coastal hazards due to global climate change have lead coastal managers at the local level to pay a particular attention to coastal dynamics and shoreline evolution. But in spite of major efforts invested and knowledge accumulated in the fields of shoreline management, lessons learned from European, national and regional initiatives have been so far poorly embedded in daily coastal management practices. The MESSINA initiative - Managing European Shoreline and Sharing Information on Nearshore Areas - intends to partly bridge this gap by: (i) breaking "knowledge isolation" of some local authorities and institutions in Europe, (ii) raising their managerial and technical capabilities through a mutualisation of the experience accumulated by each of them, and (iii) upgrading existing shoreline management guidelines through an integration of the latest techniques and methods available in Europe. The main products expected from MESSINA are: (i) a "coastal manager toolkit" made of 4 practical guides ("Monitoring and modelling the shoreline", "Valuating the shoreline", "Engineering the shoreline", "Integrating the shoreline into spatial planning policies") and a demo CDROM featuring a GIS-based prototype of shoreline management planning, (ii) a serie of 4 workshops in line with the topic of each practical guide, and (iii) a web site giving a full online access to the project outputs and to a database of approximately 50 shoreline management case studies. The overall objective of MESSINA is ultimately to maximize the benefits of future investments in coastline management and raise the public awareness about the need to manage the coastline in a sound and sustainable way. MESSINA is proposed by a European consortium made of the French Geographic Institute (IGN), the National Institute of Coastal and Marine Management of the Dutch Ministry of Public Works (RIKZ), the Municipalities of Ystad (Sweden) and Rewal (Poland), the Community of Agglomeration for the Thau Basin including the city of Sète (France), the Isle of Wight Council (UK), the Province of Ragusa (Italy), the Swedish Geotechnical Institute (SGI) and the Universities of Messina, Naples (Italy), Barcelona (Spain), and Szczeczin (Poland). i MESSINA Practical Guide Integrating the Shoreline into Spatial Policies The Practical Guide “Integrating the shoreline into spatial policies” provides a synthesis of the results of MESSINA partners' activity devoted to the prototyping of Coastal Geographic Information Systems (GIS) on three coastal sites in Europe. It is intended to help local stakeholders and coastal engineers willing to implement a coastal GIS dedicated to shoreline management with a set of methodologies, tools, best solutions described with their context, cost and limitations. The Practical Guide Integrating the Shoreline into Spatial Policies, as part of the MESSINA Coastal Toolkit, will contain the following main chapters: Section I – Introduction Section II – Recommendations for GIS technologies dedicated to Shoreline Management Section III – Guidelines for Coastal GIS integration Section IV – Experiences on implementing coastal GIS Section V – Conclusions Glossary of terms and abbreviations References ii MESSINA Practical Guide Integrating the Shoreline into Spatial Policies SECTION I - INTRODUCTION This guideline has been prepared in the framework of the MESSINA project part- funded by the INTERREG III C West Zone programme. It aims at adapting the guidelines developed in the framework of EUROSION to the particular purposes of MESSINA. These guidelines should help regional authorities and local managers willing to make a major contribution to coastal erosion management and coastal information sharing for spatial planning policies. The EUROSION study has reviewed a number of European experiences of shoreline management in which GIS played a particular role. Based on these experiences this study has formulated broad recommendations on the “ideal” specifications for GIS dedicated to coastline management. The objective of MESSINA is to take forward some of these recommendations and see how they can practically be implemented to answer the needs expressed by MESSINA partners. In turn, the outcomes of MESSINA are expected to be further developed and refined within other European regions. EUROSION has particularly highlighted that the objectives which are assigned to an information system, hence its functions, are central for its sustainability and should be in line with demands formulated at the highest level of management (for example by the mayor). In too many cases, the design of information systems is technology driven and without an explicit design brief and support from the top management, this often results in the information system being abandoned after a few years of operation. EUROSION has identified three generic objectives which are proposed to constitute the backbone of GIS dedicated to shoreline management. These are: - The mapping of areas at risk of coastal erosion and coastal flooding - The assessment of impact of human activities to shoreline stability - The balance of costs and benefits associated with different shoreline management scenarios These three generic aims are expected to reflect at least, if not all, the major part of shoreline management questions asked by decision-makers on a daily basis. MESSINA agrees on this analysis and intends to translate this into practical achievements. However, while EUROSION provisions are expected to be applicable to any European region, MESSINA will complete EUROSION analysis by assessing the feasibility of their implementation and determining which site-specific factors influence the performance of the system. A high priority among these factors are the availability of local input data, the complexity of local coastal processes and local institutional arrangements. The objective of these guidelines is to provide general advice on how to address the potential needs of geographical information for shoreline management at a local level, and how to render this geographical information not only useful but also Section I 1 MESSINA Practical Guide Integrating the Shoreline into Spatial Policies efficient for day-to-day problematic of shoreline management as well as projects, plans or programmes on coastal erosion processes. MESSINA intends to build upon the recommendations of the EUROSION project in the field of shoreline information management. These recommendations can be summarized as follows: - Investment decisions relating to shoreline management should be based on information which is not restricted to the investment area only, but on information which is made available for the entire coastal sediment cell. Experience gained from EUROSION study has indeed demonstrated that activities occurring along the same coastal sediment cell are likely to impact other parts of the cell, while activities which take place in different coastal sediment cells are not likely to interfere from a sediment budget point of view. The accurate delineation of coastal sediment cell boundaries is therefore a pre-requisite to any GIS-based decision-support information tools. - GIS-based decision-support information tools in the fields of shoreline management should fulfil three main functions: (i) the mapping of coastal erosion and associated flood risk areas, (ii) the balance of cost and benefits of future investment decisions, and (iii) the assessment of potential environmental impact of investment decisions on adjacent areas. These core functions should in turn orient data collection and integration efforts. - GIS-based information tools should be developed in partnership with the various local data providers. This is meant to avoid duplication of efforts, facilitate access to existing up-to-date data, and improve the updating processes. The willingness to design, develop and implement such tools should be manifested at the highest hierarchical level by all the participating institutions. Political leadership possibly from the regional authority, is a key pre-requisite. Three potential sites were proposed for testing MESSINA GIS concepts and therefore concreting a prototype which will comply with the three above mentioned recommendations. All of which are in the process of developing a GIS competence to support decision-making. More particularly: (i) The Côte d’Albâtre (French region of Haute-Normandy) where the regional council of Haute-Normandie and the departmental council of Seine- Maritime were planning to implement a coastal observatory. Among the goals assigned to this observatory are the monitoring of the coastline evolution and the assessment of areas at risk of coastal landslides which are of high importance. (ii) The City of Rewal (Polish region of Zachodniopomorskie) on the Eastern part of the Szczecin Lagoon near Dziwnow has been hosting a GIS developed by the University of Szczecin for several years. This GIS features various layers mainly focused on topography and socio- economical aspects of the city. MESSINA intends to adapt
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report
    Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report JUNE 2017 CENTRAL COAST WETLANDS GROUP MOSS LANDING MARINE LABS | 8272 MOSS LANDING RD, MOSS LANDING, CA Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report This page intentionally left blank Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report i Prepared by Central Coast Wetlands Group at Moss Landing Marine Labs Technical assistance provided by: ESA Revell Coastal The Nature Conservancy Center for Ocean Solutions Prepared for The County of Santa Cruz Funding Provided by: The California Ocean Protection Council Grant number C0300700 Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report ii Primary Authors: Central Coast Wetlands group Ross Clark Sarah Stoner-Duncan Jason Adelaars Sierra Tobin Kamille Hammerstrom Acknowledgements: California State Ocean Protection Council Abe Doherty Paige Berube Nick Sadrpour Santa Cruz County David Carlson City of Capitola Rich Grunow Coastal Conservation and Research Jim Oakden Science Team David Revell, Revell Coastal Bob Battalio, ESA James Gregory, ESA James Jackson, ESA GIS Layer support AMBAG Santa Cruz County Adapt Monterey Bay Kelly Leo, TNC Sarah Newkirk, TNC Eric Hartge, Center for Ocean Solution Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report iii Contents Contents Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................................ viii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Responses to Coastal Erosio in Alaska in a Changing Climate
    Responses to Coastal Erosio in Alaska in a Changing Climate A Guide for Coastal Residents, Business and Resource Managers, Engineers, and Builders Orson P. Smith Mikal K. Hendee Responses to Coastal Erosio in Alaska in a Changing Climate A Guide for Coastal Residents, Business and Resource Managers, Engineers, and Builders Orson P. Smith Mikal K. Hendee Alaska Sea Grant College Program University of Alaska Fairbanks SG-ED-75 Elmer E. Rasmuson Library Cataloging in Publication Data: Smith, Orson P. Responses to coastal erosion in Alaska in a changing climate : a guide for coastal residents, business and resource managers, engineers, and builders / Orson P. Smith ; Mikal K. Hendee. – Fairbanks, Alaska : Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2011. p.: ill., maps ; cm. - (Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks ; SG-ED-75) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Coast changes—Alaska—Guidebooks. 2. Shore protection—Alaska—Guidebooks. 3. Beach erosion—Alaska—Guidebooks. 4. Coastal engineering—Alaska—Guidebooks. I. Title. II. Hendee, Mikal K. III. Series: Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks; SG-ED-75. TC330.S65 2011 ISBN 978-1-56612-165-1 doi:10.4027/rceacc.2011 © Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks. All rights reserved. Credits This book, SG-ED-75, is published by the Alaska Sea Grant College Program, supported by the U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA National Sea Grant Office, grant NA10OAR4170097, projects A/75-02 and A/161-02; and by the University of Alaska Fairbanks with state funds. Sea Grant is a unique partnership with public and private sectors combining research, education, and technology transfer for the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Formulation of Territorial Action Plans for Coastal Protection and Management
    this project is co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund Eu project COASTANCE FINAL REPORT phase C Component 4 Territorial Action Plans for coastal protection and management Formulation of territorial Action Plans for coastal protection and management 96 95 94 93 PARTNERSHIP Region of Eastern Macedonia & Thrace (GR) - Lead Partner Regione Lazio (IT) Region of Crete (GR) Département de l’Hérault (FR) Regione Emlia-Romagna (IT) Junta de Andalucia (ES) The Ministry of Communications & Works of Cyprus (CY) Dubrovnik Neretva County Regional Development Agency (HR) a publication edit by Direzione Generale Ambiente e Difesa del Suolo e della Costa Servizio Difesa del Suolo, della Costa e Bonifica responsibles Roberto Montanari, Christian Marasmi - Servizio Difesa del Suolo, della Costa e Bonifica editor and graphic Christian Marasmi authors Roberto Montanari, Christian Marasmi - Regione Emilia-Romagna, Servizio Difesa del Suolo, della Costa e Bonifica Mentino Preti, Margherita Aguzzi, Nunzio De Nigris, Maurizio Morelli - ARPA Emilia-Romagna, Unità Specialistica Mare e Costa Maurizio Farina - Servizio Tecnico Bacino Po di Volano e della Costa Michael Aftias, Eleni Chouli - Ydronomi, Consulting Engineers Philippe Carbonnel, Alexandre Richard - Département de l’Hérault INDEX Background and strategic framework 2 The COASTANCE project 6 Component 4 strategy framework 8 Component 4 results: coastal and sediment management plans 10 Relevance of project’s outputs and results in the EU policy framework and perspectives 10 Limits and difficulties
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal and Ocean Engineering
    May 18, 2020 Coastal and Ocean Engineering John Fenton Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13/222, 1040 Vienna, Austria URL: http://johndfenton.com/ URL: mailto:[email protected] Abstract This course introduces maritime engineering, encompassing coastal and ocean engineering. It con- centrates on providing an understanding of the many processes at work when the tides, storms and waves interact with the natural and human environments. The course will be a mixture of descrip- tion and theory – it is hoped that by understanding the theory that the practicewillbemadeallthe easier. There is nothing quite so practical as a good theory. Table of Contents References ....................... 2 1. Introduction ..................... 6 1.1 Physical properties of seawater ............. 6 2. Introduction to Oceanography ............... 7 2.1 Ocean currents .................. 7 2.2 El Niño, La Niña, and the Southern Oscillation ........10 2.3 Indian Ocean Dipole ................12 2.4 Continental shelf flow ................13 3. Tides .......................15 3.1 Introduction ...................15 3.2 Tide generating forces and equilibrium theory ........15 3.3 Dynamic model of tides ...............17 3.4 Harmonic analysis and prediction of tides ..........19 4. Surface gravity waves ..................21 4.1 The equations of fluid mechanics ............21 4.2 Boundary conditions ................28 4.3 The general problem of wave motion ...........29 4.4 Linear wave theory .................30 4.5 Shoaling, refraction and breaking ............44 4.6 Diffraction ...................50 4.7 Nonlinear wave theories ...............51 1 Coastal and Ocean Engineering John Fenton 5. The calculation of forces on ocean structures ...........54 5.1 Structural element much smaller than wavelength – drag and inertia forces .....................54 5.2 Structural element comparable with wavelength – diffraction forces ..56 6.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Single-Layer Breakwater Armouring: Feedback on The
    SINGLE-LAYER BREAKWATER ARMOURING: FEEDBACK ON THE ACCROPODE™ TECHNOLOGY FROM SITE EXPERIENCE GIRAUDEL Cyril1, GARCIA Nicolas2, LEDOUX Sébastien3 The single-layer technique appeared at the beginning of the 1980s, with the ACCROPODE™ unit, and is thus entering its third decade. At the time, this solution was a real innovation, reducing the amount of concrete and steepening armour facing slopes, hence reducing the volume of materials required. After three decades in use and more than 200 projects to date, it was important to summarize the lessons learned during this period and to inspect (above and below water) some of these structures in order to assess their behaviour and particularly to confirm the validity of the unit placing rules. In addition to the aspects related to armour stability, the focus has been given to the colonization by marine life of the structures, including the bedding layers, toe berms, underlayer, armour units. The purpose of this paper is to share the experience gained throughout the inspections undertaken since 2010 on structures built more than 10 years ago. A large panel of structures has been inspected, of different ages and at various locations worldwide. Keywords: rubble-mound breakwater; single-layer armouring; ACCROPODE™ units; biodiversity INTRODUCTION The ACCROPODE™ armour unit, well known today, is a plain concrete unit designed to protect the breakwaters, in aiming to reducing considerably the use of material while implementing steeper slopes and a single layer of concrete units (Figure 1). Invented in 1981 thanks to the bases and knowledge acquired with the Tetrapod invented by the same engineering company in 1953, the technology is still currently used and more than 200 applications have been built worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Chesapeake Bay Cliff Erosion in Calvert County- and to Make Recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners on Issues Relating to Cliff Stabilization
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND BUILDING INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners VIA: Terry Shannon, County Admini VIA: Thomas Barnett, Director / FROM: Dave Brownlee, Principal Environmental Pla ner DATE: May 7, 2014 SUBJECT: Final Report of the Cliff Stabilization Advisory Committee Background: The Cliff Stabilization Advisory Committee was established by the Board of County Commissioners in November 2010. Virginia (Ginger) Haskell, PhD was appointed chairperson. The Committee was charged with responding to the State Steering Committee Report, "Chesapeake Bay Cliff Erosion in Calvert County- and to make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners on issues relating to cliff stabilization. The Committee is made up of residents representing Chesapeake Bay shoreline communities. Discussion: The Committee held monthly public meetings between January 2011 and June 2013. In an effort to educate the Committee and the community, the Committee invited geologists, biologists, engineers, academics and government officials to give presentations at 9 of their meetings. The Committee's final report (attached) has 17 recommendations and includes the response to the State Steering Committee Report (Appendix E). The Committee continued to meet between June 2013 and April 2014 to complete the report. Dr. Haskell will present the report to the Board of County Commissioners on May 13, 2014 (see attached PowerPoint). A list of the Committee members is given on pages 15-16 of the Final Report and on the last slide of the PowerPoint. Conclusion/Recommendation: Recommend that the BOCC review the Final Report and submit the Final Report to Department Heads to get feedback on implementation of the recommendations within the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Stability Design of Coastal Structures (Seadikes, Revetments, Breakwaters and Groins)
    Note: Stability of coastal structures Date: August 2016 www.leovanrijn-sediment.com STABILITY DESIGN OF COASTAL STRUCTURES (SEADIKES, REVETMENTS, BREAKWATERS AND GROINS) by Leo C. van Rijn, www.leovanrijn-sediment.com, The Netherlands August 2016 1. INTRODUCTION 2. HYDRODYNAMIC BOUNDARY CONDITIONS AND PROCESSES 2.1 Basic boundary conditions 2.2 Wave height parameters 2.2.1 Definitions 2.2.2 Wave models 2.2.3 Design of wave conditions 2.2.4 Example wave computation 2.3 Tides, storm surges and sea level rise 2.3.1 Tides 2.3.2 Storm surges 2.3.3 River floods 2.3.4 Sea level rise 2.4 Wave reflection 2.5 Wave runup 2.5.1 General formulae 2.5.2 Effect of rough slopes 2.5.3 Effect of composite slopes and berms 2.5.4 Effect of oblique wave attack 2.6 Wave overtopping 2.6.1 General formulae 2.6.2 Effect of rough slopes 2.6.3 Effect of composite slopes and berms 2.6.4 Effect of oblique wave attack 2.6.5 Effect of crest width 2.6.6 Example case 2.7 Wave transmission 1 Note: Stability of coastal structures Date: August 2016 www.leovanrijn-sediment.com 3 STABILITY EQUATIONS FOR ROCK AND CONCRETE ARMOUR UNITS 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Critical shear-stress method 3.2.1 Slope effects 3.2.2 Stability equations for stones on mild and steep slopes 3.3 Critical wave height method 3.3.1 Stability equations; definitions 3.3.2 Stability equations for high-crested conventional breakwaters 3.3.3 Stability equations for high-crested berm breakwaters 3.3.4 Stability equations for low-crested, emerged breakwaters and groins 3.3.5 Stability equations for submerged breakwaters
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Management Software to Support the Decision-Makers to Mitigate Coastal Erosion
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Coastal Management Software to Support the Decision-Makers to Mitigate Coastal Erosion Carlos Coelho * , Pedro Narra, Bárbara Marinho and Márcia Lima RISCO & Civil Engineering Department, Aveiro University, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; [email protected] (P.N.); [email protected] (B.M.); [email protected] (M.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 4 December 2019; Accepted: 8 January 2020; Published: 11 January 2020 Abstract: There are no sequential and integrated approaches that include the steps needed to perform an adequate management and planning of the coastal zones to mitigate coastal erosion problems and climate change effects. Important numerical model packs are available for users, but often looking deeply to the physical processes, demanding big computational efforts and focusing on specific problems. Thus, it is important to provide adequate tools to the decision-makers, which can be easily interpreted by populations, promoting discussions of optimal intervention scenarios in medium to long-term horizons. COMASO (coastal management software) intends to fill this gap, presenting a group of tools that can be applied in standalone mode, or in a sequential order. The first tool should map the coastal erosion vulnerability and risk, also including the climate change effects, defining a hierarchy of priorities where coastal defense interventions should be performed, or limiting/constraining some land uses or activities. In the locations identified as priorities, a more detailed analysis should consider the application of shoreline and cross-shore evolution models (second tool), allowing discussing intervention scenarios, in medium to long-term horizons. After the defined scenarios, the design of the intervention should be discussed, both in case of being a hard coastal structure or an artificial nourishment (third type of tools).
    [Show full text]
  • North Sheppey Erosion Study Volume 1: Coastal
    NORTH SHEPPEY EROSION STUDY VOLUME 1: COASTAL ADAPTATION STUDY Client: Consultant: Swale Borough Council Engineering Services Swale House, Canterbury City Council East Street, Military Road Sittingbourne, Canterbury, ME10 3HT CT1 1YW OCTOBER 2011 Canterbury City Council Engineering Services 0 LIST OF CONTENTS Page VOLUME 1: COASTAL ADAPTATION STUDY Executive Summary 3 1. Background 4 2. Description of site 6 3. Higher level plans 25 4. Historical and Coastal Evolution 31 5. Geology and Morphology 34 6. Aerial photography 36 7. Lidar Airborne laser scanning 37 8. Historic Ordnance Survey Records 39 9. Parameters 40 10. Management of Coastal Erosion Options 50 11. Do Nothing Scenario 62 12. Economic Appraisal 65 13. Environmental Assessment 67 14. Monitoring and Public Warning 69 15. Consultation 71 16. Recommendations and Implementation 72 References 75 List of Photographs Photo 1- The Leas looking west 7 Photo 2- East End of Minster 11 Photo 3- Minster cliffs and sea defences looking west 14 Photo 4- Fly tipping near Royal Oak Point, cliffs highly vegetated. 15 Photo 5- View from Redcot Caravan Park looking across to Lazy Days park 16 Photo 6- Redcot caravan park 16 Photo 7- Looking West from Ashcroft caravan park 17 Photo 8- Barrows Brook 18 Photo 9- Recent mud run at Ashcroft caravan park 19 Photo 10-Warden Point west of Warden Springs 20 Photo 11- Looking east towards Warden Point 20 Photo 12- Rock armour at Warden Bay revetment looking west 23 Photo 13- Rear scarp of recent slide Cliff Drive, Warden Bay 23 Photo 14- Land slide at Warden Point November 1971 43 Photo 15- Cliff warning sign 70 List of Tables 35 Table 1- Geological Details Table 2- Average Future Erosion for England and Wales 41 Table 3- Historic and predicted future erosion rates 42 Table 4- Recorded land slide history 44 Table 5- Relative sea level rise from UKCP09 47 Table 6- Recommended contingency allowances for net sea level rise PPS25 48 Table 7- Property adaptation, financial options 61 Table 8- Summary of impacts resulting from a do nothing scenario.
    [Show full text]
  • Chesapeake Bay Cliff Erosion in Calvert County Draft Steering Committee Report
    Chesapeake Bay Cliff Erosion in Calvert County Draft Steering Committee Report Calvert County Maryland Department of Natural Resources Maryland Department of the Environment United States Army Corps of Engineers United States Fish and Wildlife Service Maryland Emergency Management Agency October 26, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 4 II. THE STEERING COMMITTEE 5 III. OVERVIEW 5 A. The Cliffs in Calvert County 5 1. Homes on the Cliffs 2. Soil Erosion 3. Calvert County Zoning – Building Restrictions 4. Efforts to Address Soil Erosion B. Considerations 8 1. Geology 2. Engineering 3. The Puritan Tiger Beetle III. SHORT­TERM POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS 10 A. Site Characterization 10 1. Soil Composition 2. Shoreline Structures 3. Degree of Slope 4. Soil Erosion at the Bank 5. Vegetative Cover 6. Puritan Tiger Beetle Habitat 7. Other Data 8. Characterization B. Assessment of Properties at Highest Potential Immediate Risk 13 1. Ryan and Associates 2. International Residential Code 3. Site‐Specific Analysis C. Potential Short­Term Solutions 14 1. MEMA/FEMA Funding 2. The County MEMA/FEMA Application 2 3. Implementation IV. MEDIUM­TERM POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS 17 A. Engineering 17 1. Cliff Stabilization 2. Shoreline Stabilization. B. Impacts on the Puritan Tiger Beetle 18 1. The Regulatory Framework 2. Population Viability Analysis 3. Minimization and Mitigation 4. FWS and DNR Assistance V. LONG­TERM POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS 19 VI. CONCLUSION 20 VII. REFERENCES 20 3 I. INTRODUCTION Following a February 20, 2010 Town Hall meeting in Calvert County, state, federal and county agencies formed a Steering Committee to study and develop recommendations to address the impact of shoreline erosion on houses located near the eroding cliffs in Calvert County.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Contents
    3 Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 CIRIA C683 63 3 Materials CHAPTER 3 CONTENTS 3.1 Introduction. 71 3.1.1 Materials considerations for concept stage. 72 3.1.1.1 Scale of project . 72 3.1.1.2 Planning and timescales . 73 3.1.1.3 Top sizes of armour . 73 3.1.1.4 Rock source and procurement options . 73 3.1.1.5 Holistic considerations . 74 3.1.1.6 Cost of project. 76 3.1.1.7 Towards preliminary design. 76 3.1.2 Important design functions and properties of materials. 79 3.1.2.1 Functions of materials in the structure . 79 3.1.2.2 Material properties . 81 3.1.3 Durability considerations . 82 3.1.3.1 Mitigation strategies for low-durability scenarios of rock armour . 83 3.1.3.2 Durability considerations for material other than armourstone. 83 3.1.4 Standards for armourstone. 84 3.2 Quarried rock – overview of properties and functions. 86 3.2.1 Introduction to quarried rock . 86 3.2.2 Introduction to engineering geology . 86 3.2.3 Quarry evaluation principles . 91 3.2.4 Properties and functions – general. 94 3.3 Quarried rock – intrinsic properties . 95 3.3.1 Aesthetic properties of armourstone . 95 3.3.2 Petrographic properties . 95 3.3.3 Mass density, porosity and water absorption . 95 3.3.3.1 Phase relations . 95 3.3.3.2 Density definitions . 96 3.3.3.3 Degree of saturation in stability calculations . 97 3.3.3.4 Density variation in a quarry .
    [Show full text]
  • Riprap Slope Protection Phase 4 (Final)
    Design Standards No. 13 Embankment Dams Chapter 7: Riprap Slope Protection Phase 4 (Final) U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation May 2014 Mission Statements The U.S. Department of the Interior protects America’s natural resources and heritage, honors our cultures and tribal communities, and supplies the energy to power our future. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Design Standards Signature Sheet Design Standards No. 13 Embankment Dams DS-13(7)-2.1: Phase 4 (Final) May 2014 Chapter 7: Riprap Slope Protection Revision Number OS-13(7)-2.1 Summary of revisions: In the rollout presentation of the Riprap Design Standard, Chapter 7, Bobby Rinehart of the labs commented that ASTM standards are now being used as much, or more than, USBR laboratory testing procedures. Therefore, the ASTM test procedure numbers should be included in the Design Standard. The ASTM Standard Test Numbers will be added to the Riprap Quality Tests along with the currently cited only with USBR designations test numbers. These are in section 7.2.5, pages 10 and 11, and will be rewritten as follows: o Specific gravity (ASTM C127, USBR 4127) o Absorption (ASTM C127, USBR 4127) o Sodium sulfate soundness (ASTM C88, ASTM D5240, USBR 4088) o Los Angeles abrasion (ASTM C131, ASTM C535, USBR 4131) o Freeze-thaw durability (ASTM D5312, USBR 4666) Prepared by: Robert L. Dewey, P. Date Technical Specialist, Geotechnical Engineering Group 3, 86-68313 Peer Review: Jack Gagliardi, P.E.
    [Show full text]