DOCSLIB.ORG

Managing Climate Change Hazards in Coastal Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Managing Climate Change Hazards in Coastal Areas MAIN MANUAL CI-12 CI-11 CI-10 TSR CI-9 CI-8 PL-1 PL-2 PL-3 CI-7 PL-4 CI-6 PL-5 4 4 3 PL-6 CI-5 2 4 2 4 3 PL-7 CI-4 4 4 PL-8 2 4 4 3 3 PL-9 4 3 2 3 2 3 CI-3 3 3 3 2 PL-10 2 2 3 3 2 3 CI-2 4 2 3 3 4 PL-11 4 3 4 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 1 PL-12 CI-1 4 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 3 2 3 PL-13 2 3 3 4 2 1 1 3 3 2 R-4 3 4 3 4 4 Tidal inlet/Sand spit/River mouth 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 4 3 3 4 4 4 2 4 2 4 PL-14 R-3 3 4 4 4 2 2 4 3 4 3 4 2 3 3 PL-15 R-2 1 3 4 4 N Y N 4 2 4 4 Y N Y Y N 4 2 3 3 3 PL-16 R-1 1 2 4 N Y N 2 4 Y Y 4 2 2 2 PL-17 1 1 1 4 4 N N 2 FR-22 Y Y 4 4 3 2 3 1 2 1 2 4 N N PL-18 FR-21 1 4 Y Y 4 2 2 3 1 1 N N 2 2 1 2 4 2 2 3 3 PL-19 FR-20 1 Y Sur B/D Sur Y 2 4 3 3 1 1 A B/D B/D N 2 PL-20 2 Sur Sur 4 1 FR-19 1 3 1 A B/D Y 4 2 2 2 A B/D N 4 3 1 PL-21 1 3 4 Sur Sur 2 2 3 FR-18 3 2 A Y 2 3 1 3 4 B/D N 2 PL-22 2 N B B/D 2 3 2 FR-17 2 3 NB Y 4 3 1 3 Y Sur 4 2 PL-23 2 3 N B Any N 3 FR-16 3 3 NB Any Any 4 1 1 Y Any Intermit B/D Y 4 3 2 PL-24 2 2 1 2 1 FR-15 3 Any Any marsh N 2 BA-1 2 1 N Intermit Sur 2 4 2 C 2 4 3 2 3 Y Any mangr Y 2 FR-14 2 4 A 4 BA-2 3 Marsh/ B/D N 2 3 2 4 N C Any Any 1 3 1 Any Any Any tidal at Y 3 FR-13 2 3 Y 1 2 4 BA-3 3 4 M/M Any Sur 3 1 Micro N 4 BA-4 FR-12 2 3 N B Mangr/ 1 1 3 2 4 No Any B/D 2 2 2 2 Y tidal at Y 1 1 BA-5 FR-11 3 1 P Ex Meso/ 3 4 3 N NB Mx Mx N 4 2 2 3 Any Ex macro Sur 2 3 1 C A Y 3 BA-6 FR-10 Y P Any 3 3 2 1 2 B 2 3 3 1 B/D N N P Coral Any 4 3 3 BA-7 FR-9 3 1 R 2 2 2 3 1 NB Any Any isl Sediment Y Y Ex Any Sur 2 2 2 1 2 BA-8 FR-8 2 2 2 3 4 Mx plain Any N N Flat Mx B Y 4 4 4 3 4 BA-9 FR-7 3 2 2 3 4 Y hard rock B/D Barrier Intermit C Ex N 4 4 3 3 3 BA-10 2 1 2 3 4 N Any Micro marsh FR-6 NB Slop soft Sur Delta/ P Y 2 2 4 2 2 3 4 Y P rock 3 BA-11 3 1 Any Intermit N 2 FR-5 N B low est isl 2 2 1 2 3 1 Any Mx mangr B/D Y 2 BA-12 2 2 Y Meso/ 4 4 FR-4 3 1 NB Ex 4 3 4 2 2 Ex Mx macro Sur N BA-13 3 N Any P Marsh/ 4 4 FR-3 1 Any Y 3 3 2 3 Y Sur tidal at 3 2 1 Any B/D 2 2 BA-14 3 1 N 4 FR-2 1 2 N Vege- Mangr/ 2 2 3 3 1 B/D Any Any Y 2 2 BA-15 1 Y tated tidal at Sur 4 1 FR-1 1 1 1 Meso/ Micro N 4 2 1 1 N Not 4 BA-16 1 Sur macro Any 4 3 2 2 B/D Y 4 3 SR-20 1 1 Y veget. 3 BA-17 1 B/D Vege- N 2 3 2 2 N Any 2Sur5 2 2 SR-19 1 1 tated YEARS Y 2 4 BA-18 1 1 Y Sur Not 201 6 2 1 2 1 B/D N 4 2 3 SR-18 1 1 1 N veget. Intermit 4 1 BA-19 1 B/D Mangr/ Intermit 1 Y Marsh/ marsh Sur Y 4 4 2 SR-17 1 1 2 tidal at mangr N 4 3 BA-20 1 1 N Sur tidal at B/D 2 3 3 1 1 2 Y 2 BA-21 SR-16 1 Y B/D 2 3 2 1 N Sur N 2 4 2 1 1 1 Sur B/D 1 BA-22 SR-15 3 1 Y Y 2 1 1 1 B/D Sur 1 4 3 1 1 N Sur N 4 1 SR-14 1 1 Y B/D Sur B/D Sur B/D Y 1 4 2 BA-23 1 1 1 N 3 4 2 1 1 N 1 2 4 BA-24 SR-13 1 1 Y Y 2 2 4 2 1 1 1 N 4 DE-1 SR-12 N Y 2 4 3 1 3 1 1 2 Y 2 3 N N 2 4 4 DE-2 SR-11 1 1 2 Y Y 2 2 4 1 1 1 N Y N 2 2 1 1 1 Y N N 4 3 4 3 DE-3 SR-10 1 Y N Y N Y 4 2 1 1 1 N Y 2 4 4 3 4 DE-4 SR-9 1 3 1 1 2 2 1 2 4 DE-5 4 1 2 4 4 2 4 3 3 SR-8 1 1 1 4 2 2 2 1 2 4 2 2 4 4 2 3 DE-6 1 1 2 4 4 3 4 SR-7 2 1 4 4 2 2 4 2 3 1 3 2 2 2 4 4 4 3 DE-7 SR-6 4 3 2 4 1 4 3 4 2 2 4 1 DE-8 1 1 4 3 4 3 DE-9 SR-5 2 3 3 4 1 3 3 2 DE-10 SR-4 3 1 2 3 3 1 3 4 DE-11 SR-3 4 3 4 3 DE-12 4 DE-13 SR-2 3 4 3 4 3 DE-14 DE-15 SR-1 DE-16 DE-17 DE-18 DE-24 DE-23 DE-22 DE-21 DE-20 DE-19 COASTAL CLASSIFICATION (start in wheel center) INHERENT HAZARD LEVEL Geological layout Wave exposure Ex Exposed Mx Moderately exposed High Very high Very Low P Protected Moderate Ecosystem disruption 1 2 3 4 Tidal range Gradual inundation 1 2 3 4 Flora/fauna Salt water intrusion 1 2 3 4 B/D Balance/decit Sediment balance 1 2 3 4 Sur Surplus Erosion 1 2 3 4 NB No Beach Flooding B Beach Storm climate Y Yes to tropical cyclone activity N No to tropical cyclone activity Note: R= Sloping hard rock; C=Corals; M/M=Marsh/Mangrove; A=Any Managing climate change hazards in coastal areas The Coastal Hazard Wheel decision-support system Main manual Lead Authors Lars Rosendahl Appelquist, Thomas Balstrøm, Kirsten Halsnæs Contributing Authors and Reviewers Robert J. Nicholls, Matthew M. Linham, Jason Spensley, Joost Stronkhorst, Peter Koefoed Bjørnsen, Gareth James Lloyd, Gorm Jeppesen, Ole Vestergaard Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following for their valuable feedback and advice: Troels Aagaard, Ibrahim Al-Zu'bi, Daniel Tutu Benefor, Sanju Deenapanray, Ilaria Firmian, Ib Kidde-Hansen, Thanak De Lopez, Karsten Mangor, Jacopo Monzini, Anne Olhoff, Moussa Sall, Rami Abu Salman. Copyright © 2016, United Nations Environment Programme & Lars Rosendahl Appelquist ISBN: 978-92-807-3593-2 UNEP Job No: DEP/2029/NA Disclaimers This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit services without special permission from the copyright holders, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. Reuse of any figures is subject to permission from the original rights holders. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct and properly referenced, UNEP does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report
    Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report JUNE 2017 CENTRAL COAST WETLANDS GROUP MOSS LANDING MARINE LABS | 8272 MOSS LANDING RD, MOSS LANDING, CA Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report This page intentionally left blank Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report i Prepared by Central Coast Wetlands Group at Moss Landing Marine Labs Technical assistance provided by: ESA Revell Coastal The Nature Conservancy Center for Ocean Solutions Prepared for The County of Santa Cruz Funding Provided by: The California Ocean Protection Council Grant number C0300700 Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report ii Primary Authors: Central Coast Wetlands group Ross Clark Sarah Stoner-Duncan Jason Adelaars Sierra Tobin Kamille Hammerstrom Acknowledgements: California State Ocean Protection Council Abe Doherty Paige Berube Nick Sadrpour Santa Cruz County David Carlson City of Capitola Rich Grunow Coastal Conservation and Research Jim Oakden Science Team David Revell, Revell Coastal Bob Battalio, ESA James Gregory, ESA James Jackson, ESA GIS Layer support AMBAG Santa Cruz County Adapt Monterey Bay Kelly Leo, TNC Sarah Newkirk, TNC Eric Hartge, Center for Ocean Solution Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report iii Contents Contents Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................................ viii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seminar Coastal Morphodynamics Lecturers
    Seminar Coastal Morphodynamics IMAU, Utrecht University, 2008 Lecturers: Prof. dr. Paolo Blondeaux Prof. dr. Giovanna Vittori Dpt. of Environmental Engineering University of Genoa, Italy Huib de Swart 2 1 General objective of this seminar Discuss physical processes that cause the presence of undulations of the sea bottom Example 1: Ripples at the beach Horizontal length scale ~ 10 cm ; height ~ 2 cm Generation timescale ~ hours Due to: waves Relevance: wave prediction, estimation of sediment transport 3 Example 2: Tidal sand waves Horizontal length scale ~ 500 m; height ~ 2 m Generation timescale ~ years Due to: tides Relevance: e.g, buckling of pipelines, navigation 4 2 Sand waves in the Marsdiep 5 Example 3: Sand ridges on the outer and inner shelf Britain Netherlands North Sea Tidal sand ridges Shoreface-connected sand ridges Horizontal length scale ~ km; height ~ 5-10 m Generation timescale ~ 100 years Due to: tides and storm-driven currents Relevance: sand mining, coastal stability 6 3 Research questions 1. Which mechanisms are responsible for the formation and maintenance of rhythmic topography in coastal seas? 2. Can we predict the characteristics of bedforms? • spatial pattern • migration speed • height 3. What is the response of bottom patterns to - human interventions (e.g., extraction of sand)? - sea level changes? 7 Research approaches: 1. Collection and analysis of field observations (identify phenomena+ describe behaviour) Problems: • lack of data • selection of spatial + temporal resolution • selection of spatial + temporal extent • what is transient/nontransient behaviour? 8 4 2. Collection and analysis of laboratory data C. Paolo Univ. of Minnesota Advantages: data obtained under controlled conditions Problems: link to reality (scaling problems) 9 3.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTROL of .ALLUVIAL RIVERS by STEEL JETTIES By
    CONTROL OF .ALLUVIAL RIVERS BY STEEL JETTIES by E. 1. Carlson and R. A. Dodge, Jr. A paper to be presented at The First Water Resources Engineering Conference of The American Society of Civil Engineers, Omaha, Nebraska, May 14-18, 1962 CONTROL OF ALLUVIAL RIVERS BY STEEL JETTIES by E. J. Carlsonl / and R. A. Dodge, Jr. 2 / SYNOPSIS Both field and laboratory studies were conducted to refine the methods used in the design of steel jetty fields for river aline- ment. A set of dimensionless friction head-loss curves, verified by model studies are developed and described. Using the developed curves and reconnaissance field data, a method is given for predict- ing the changes in a riverbed after the designed jetty field is installed. /Head, Sediment Investigations Unit, Hydraulics Branch, Division of Engineering Laboratories, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado. 2 /Hydraulic Engineer, Hydraulics Branch, Division of Engineering Laboratories, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado. INTRODUCTION Steel jacks and jetties have been used successfully by the Corps of Engineers, highway departments, railway companies, and others to prevent damage to riverbanks, levees, bridge abutments, and other structures. The Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps of Engineers are using them to stabilize the channel of the Rio Grande within the floodway in the Middle Rio Grande Valley. (1)1 / The individual jack unit consists of three angle irons, 12 or 16 feet in length placed at 90° angles in three planes and joined at their cen- ters, Figure 1. Wire is laced through the angle irons in a standard pattern to tie them together.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Morphodynamics Affected by Beachrocks: Observations from Selected Beaches in Jamaica, W
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 20, EGU2018-17701-1, 2018 EGU General Assembly 2018 © Author(s) 2018. CC Attribution 4.0 license. Coastal morphodynamics affected by beachrocks: observations from selected beaches in Jamaica, W. I. Taneisha Edwards and Simon Mitchell The University of the West Indies (Mona), Department of Geography and Geology, Jamaica ([email protected]) Effects of beachrocks on wave and coastal morphodynamics are not at this time known. However, since more beachrocks are becoming exposed with sea level rise and erosion it is important that we try to understand and quantify the processes in order to inform and fine-tune temporal models of beach response to daily coastal processes and storm events. The observations of wave morphodynamics at some Jamaican beaches represent a new class of beach that probably operates outside the bounds of existing morphodynamical models. Beaches affected by beachrocks in Jamaica depict a heightened backwash resulting in faster scouring and erosion. This scouring and erosion results in loss of sediment seaward. Beachrock when buried does not directly affect waves but indirectly affects the backwash by changing the porosity of the beach body. This change will negatively affect the drainage regime, by reducing the infiltration potential of the swash and increasing the backwash. Alternately, when beachrocks are exposed waves are directly affected; in early stages of exposure, beachrock appears to be a buffer and protects the beach from erosion by reflecting and refracting waves. Sediment is often build up behind the beachrock. However, after prolonged exposure, the opposite is seen where the beachrock is isolated, and the profile of the beach is lowered as most of the sediment is loss and physical features of erosion persist such as scarps, and scour lagoons behind the beachrock on the shore-face.
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with Erosion: the Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods
    2ND ANNUAL CAPE COASTAL CONFERENCE Linking Science with Local Solutions and Decision-Making Dealing With Erosion: The Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods Greg Berman (Woods Hole Sea Grant & Cape Cod Cooperative Extension) Photo Credit: Ted Keon Climate Change Impacts In Coastal Environments 34 5 12 Coastal Adaptation On Cape Cod we manage at parcel scale http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/regional/index.php?idp=223 The Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods Why protect properties……..? Town of Brewster example The Facts The Implications Value = $333,000,000 (don’t want takings) Only ~1% of properties To keep the same revenue, ~3% of town area the tax rate would go from 8.18 to 9.06 but they make ~10% of the real estate taxes or ~$300 per household The Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods • Do nothing 1. Will system recover by itself? 2. How far is the structure from the water? 3. Grandfathering protects structures (not lawn) before August 10, 1978 Photo Credit: Ann McNichol The Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods • Do nothing • Vegetation Plant Natives: Root systems stabilize. Take up water. Break the impact of raindrops or wave-splash. Slow down runoff Remove Invasive The Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods • Do nothing • Vegetation • Re-grade The Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods • Do nothing Horizontal • Vegetation • Re-grade • Managed retreat V E R T I C A L The Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods • Do nothing Photo Credit: Ted Keon • Vegetation • Re-grade • Managed retreat • Beach
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling the Impact of Coastal Defence Structures on the Nearshore Morphodynamics
    MODELLING THE IMPACT OF COASTAL DEFENCE STRUCTURES ON THE NEARSHORE MORPHODYNAMICS A thesis submitted to Cardiff University in candidature for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Fernando Alvarez-Martinez Hydro-environmental Research Centre School of Engineering Cardiff University 2016 Acknowledgements ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my appreciation to the people and organisations that supported and accompanied me in this long journey. To the School of Engineering of Cardiff University for supporting this PhD programme. To all Cardiff University staff in the Research, Finance and Teaching offices for their support to all PhD students, making things easier for all during the process. To family and friends that always supported me and encouraged me to keep going until the end. To Dr. Shunqi Pan for his patience, advice and support during all the stages of this PhD and to Professor Roger A. Falconer for his support. i Abstract MODELLING THE IMPACT OF COASTAL DEFENCE STRUCTURES ON THE NEARSHORE MORPHODYNAMICS Fernando Alvarez-Martinez ABSTRACT Coastal areas are heavily populated in countries around the world and are a source of economic activity, both recreational and industrial. Waves and tides interact with sediments in a dynamic equilibrium which leads to coastal morphological changes at different temporal and spatial scales. Natural or human-induced changes in this equilibrium may lead to an alteration of the coastline causing environmental or economic impacts. Coastal defences are often needed in order to protect specific areas and reduce such impacts. Therefore, understanding the impact that coastal defence structures have on coastal morphological changes is important for coastal managers.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Nourishment Effects Østerstrand Fredericia - Denmark 2017
    Beach Nourishment Effects Østerstrand Fredericia - Denmark 2017 Juni 2020 Project Building with Nature (EU-InterReg) Start date 01.11.2016 End date 01.07.2020 Project manager (PM) Ane Høiberg Nielsen Project leader (PL) Per Sørensen Project staff (PS) Henrik Vinge Karlsson Time registering 402412 Approved date 26.06.2020 Signature Report Beach nourishment effects – Østerstrand, Frederica, Denmark Author Henrik Vinge Karlsson and Per Sørensen Keyword Beach nourishment, Nourishment design, Coastal protection, Building with nature, BWN, Fredericia, Østerstrand. Distribution www.kyst.dk, www.northsearegion.eu/building-with-nature Referred to as Kystdirektoratet (2020), Beach nourishment effects – Østerstrand, Frederica; Lemvig. 2 Beach Nourishment Effects Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Description of Study site .............................................................................................................................5 1.2 Division of study stretch..............................................................................................................................7 1.3 Description of Nourishment ......................................................................................................................7 1.4 Research design ..............................................................................................................................................8 1.4.1 Research questions..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Wave Shape on Sediment Transport in Coastal Regions
    Archives of Hydro-Engineering and Environmental Mechanics Vol. 65 (2018), No. 2, pp. 73–90 DOI: 10.1515/heem-2018-0006 © IBW PAN, ISSN 1231–3726 Influence of Wave Shape on Sediment Transport in Coastal Regions Rafał Ostrowski Institute of Hydro-Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Kościerska 7, 80-953 Gdańsk, Poland e-mail: [email protected] (Received September 05, 2018; revised November 11, 2018) Abstract The paper deals with the influence of the wave shape, represented by water surface elevations and wave-induced nearbed velocities, on sediment transport under joint wave-current impact. The focus is on the theoretical description of vertically asymmetric wave motion and the effects of wave asymmetry on net sediment transport rates during interaction of coastal steady cur- rents, namely wave-driven currents, with wave-induced unsteady free stream velocities. The cross-shore sediment transport is shown to depend on wave asymmetry not only quantitatively (in terms of rate), but also qualitatively (in terms of direction). Within longshore lithodynamics, wave asymmetry appears to have a significant effect on the net sediment transport rate. Key words: wave shape, nearbed free stream velocities, wave-driven currents, cross-shore sediment transport, longshore sediment transport 1. Introduction Many coastal engineering problems are associated with changes in the sea bed profile. Investigations of this evolution are partly related to search for the origin of bars and theoretical description of their migration. Besides, the knowledge of sea bed dynam- ics makes it possible to accurately predict changes in the shoreline position. Conven- tionally, coastal morphodynamics are modelled theoretically by means of the spatial variability of net sediment transport rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal and Ocean Engineering
    May 18, 2020 Coastal and Ocean Engineering John Fenton Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13/222, 1040 Vienna, Austria URL: http://johndfenton.com/ URL: mailto:[email protected] Abstract This course introduces maritime engineering, encompassing coastal and ocean engineering. It con- centrates on providing an understanding of the many processes at work when the tides, storms and waves interact with the natural and human environments. The course will be a mixture of descrip- tion and theory – it is hoped that by understanding the theory that the practicewillbemadeallthe easier. There is nothing quite so practical as a good theory. Table of Contents References ....................... 2 1. Introduction ..................... 6 1.1 Physical properties of seawater ............. 6 2. Introduction to Oceanography ............... 7 2.1 Ocean currents .................. 7 2.2 El Niño, La Niña, and the Southern Oscillation ........10 2.3 Indian Ocean Dipole ................12 2.4 Continental shelf flow ................13 3. Tides .......................15 3.1 Introduction ...................15 3.2 Tide generating forces and equilibrium theory ........15 3.3 Dynamic model of tides ...............17 3.4 Harmonic analysis and prediction of tides ..........19 4. Surface gravity waves ..................21 4.1 The equations of fluid mechanics ............21 4.2 Boundary conditions ................28 4.3 The general problem of wave motion ...........29 4.4 Linear wave theory .................30 4.5 Shoaling, refraction and breaking ............44 4.6 Diffraction ...................50 4.7 Nonlinear wave theories ...............51 1 Coastal and Ocean Engineering John Fenton 5. The calculation of forces on ocean structures ...........54 5.1 Structural element much smaller than wavelength – drag and inertia forces .....................54 5.2 Structural element comparable with wavelength – diffraction forces ..56 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Morphodynamics and Human Impacts Roshan T Ramessur* Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius
    astal D o ev f C e o lo l p a m Ramessur, J Coast Dev 2013, 16:3 n r e u n t o J Journal of Coastal Development DOI: 10.4172/1410-5217.1000e104 ISSN: 1410-5217 EditorialResearch Article OpenOpen Access Access Coastal Morphodynamics and Human Impacts Roshan T Ramessur* Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius Keywords: Coastal erosion and accretion rehabilitation; Coastal the loss of settlements, such as villages and towns. Countries are now protection; Coastal engineering solutions. increasingly being affected mostly by hydrogeometeorological hazards and disasters, namely, floods, mass movements (e.g. erosion, landslides It has long been obvious that our beaches have evolved with time and siltation), tropical cyclones, hurricanes, tsunamis, swells and storms in response to factors including the supply of sediment, the action of due to climate change [1-4]. The Special Issue in the Journal of Coastal waves and currents, geological constraints, structures and sea level rise. Development on “Coastal Morphodynamics and Human Impacts” The coastal zone is a delicate dynamic balance between the powerful will deal with papers on erosion and accretion, coastal protection and driving forces of the ocean such as cyclones, waves, surges and tides rehabilitation and coastal conservation plan, shoreline modifications as well as the reef-lagoon-beach ecosystem. It offers protection against and human impacts. Articles can deal with coastal evolution and sea these processes, as well, as producing sediments for the beaches and level rise, seasonal variation, storm response, conceptual models as should be viewed as one complex multidisciplinary entity with the scientific and engineering tools for a variety of coastal landforms and various conflicting uses and activities taking place within the zone.
    [Show full text]
  • COASTAL HAZARDS Too Many People Living Too Close to the Edge of a Rising Sea
    COASTAL HAZARDS Too Many People Living Too Close To The Edge Of A Rising Sea A Growing Challenge For The 21st Century This Report Is Part Of The Ocean On The Edge Series Produced By The Aquarium Of The Pacific As Products Of Its National Conference—Ocean On The Edge: Top Ocean Issues, May 2009 2 COASTAL HAZARDS Ocean on the Edge: Top Ocean Issues Making Ocean Issues Come Alive for the Public The conference brought together leading marine scientists and engineers, policy-makers, film-makers, exhibit designers, informal science educators, journalists and communicators to develop a portfolio of models for communicating major ocean issues to the public. This report is one of a series of reports from that conference. The reports include: Coastal Hazards, Marine Ecosystems and Fisheries, Pollution in the Ocean, and Critical Condition: Ocean Health and Human Health. There is also a series of briefer reports on film-making, kiosk messaging design, and communicating science to the public. All reports are available at www.aquariumofpacific.org COASTAL HAZARDS 3 4 COASTAL HAZARDS Acknowledgements Support for the “Ocean on the Edge Conference: Issues” held in May 2009, at Long Beach Top Ocean Issues” was provided by NOAA, Convention Center. Participants in the the National Science Foundation, Southern Coastal Hazards workshop session included: California Edison, SAVOR, the Long Beach Dr. Robert Dean, Dr. R. A. Dalrymple, Dr. Convention Center, and the Aquarium of the Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., Dr. Jerry R. Pacific. Schubel, and Dana Swanson. Sandy Eslinger was the facilitator of the session. Leah Young We are grateful to the Conference’s National and Margaret Schubel were the rapporteurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Chesapeake Bay Cliff Erosion in Calvert County- and to Make Recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners on Issues Relating to Cliff Stabilization
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND BUILDING INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners VIA: Terry Shannon, County Admini VIA: Thomas Barnett, Director / FROM: Dave Brownlee, Principal Environmental Pla ner DATE: May 7, 2014 SUBJECT: Final Report of the Cliff Stabilization Advisory Committee Background: The Cliff Stabilization Advisory Committee was established by the Board of County Commissioners in November 2010. Virginia (Ginger) Haskell, PhD was appointed chairperson. The Committee was charged with responding to the State Steering Committee Report, "Chesapeake Bay Cliff Erosion in Calvert County- and to make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners on issues relating to cliff stabilization. The Committee is made up of residents representing Chesapeake Bay shoreline communities. Discussion: The Committee held monthly public meetings between January 2011 and June 2013. In an effort to educate the Committee and the community, the Committee invited geologists, biologists, engineers, academics and government officials to give presentations at 9 of their meetings. The Committee's final report (attached) has 17 recommendations and includes the response to the State Steering Committee Report (Appendix E). The Committee continued to meet between June 2013 and April 2014 to complete the report. Dr. Haskell will present the report to the Board of County Commissioners on May 13, 2014 (see attached PowerPoint). A list of the Committee members is given on pages 15-16 of the Final Report and on the last slide of the PowerPoint. Conclusion/Recommendation: Recommend that the BOCC review the Final Report and submit the Final Report to Department Heads to get feedback on implementation of the recommendations within the report.
    [Show full text]