Cbsg Aridland Antelope Workshop

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cbsg Aridland Antelope Workshop CBSG ARIDLAND ANTELOPE WORKSHOP San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A. 13-15 September, 1989 Captive Breeding Specialist Group, Species Survival Commission, International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Prepared by U. S. Seal, K. Sausrnan, and J. Mikolai 1 February 1990 CBSG ARIDLAND ANTELOPE WORKSHOP San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A. 13-15 September 1989 Contents Page Overviews Artiodactyla Overview: Sausman ....................................................................... 1 Population Biology Overview: Foose ............... ...... .... ............ .... ............ .... ...... ... 1 1 Antelope Specialist Group Overview: Estes .. .... .............. .... .... ............ ...... .. .... 4 1 Status of Desert Antelopes in Captivity: Sausman .......... ................. ........... 4 7 Antelope Action Plan Selections: R. East .......................................................... 53 Arabian Oryx Summary of Arabian Oryx Plan .... .... .. .... .. .. .. .. .... .. .... .. .... .... .. .. .. ... .. .... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. 8 5 Captive Population Information .................. ................ .................. ...... .. ........ .... 8 9 Genetic Status of Arabian Oryx Re-introduced into Oman: Mace. .. ..... 1 0 3 Arabian Oryx in Saudi Arabia: Asmode and Khoja .................................... 1 0 9 Scimitar-Horned Oryx Summary of Scimitar-Horned Oryx Plan ... .. ........... ...... ...... .. .......... ............. ... 1 2 9 Captive Population Information ......................................................................... 1 3 3 Scimitar-Horned Oryx Re-introduced to Tunisia: Mace ............................ 14 7 Add ax Summary of Addax Plan .. ... .. .. ..... .. ..... .. .............. ................ .... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .... ...... .. 1 5 3 Historical Perspective and Status: Correll...................................................... 1 57 Addax in Niger: Newby and Magin ................................................................ 15 9 Genetic Analyses: Mace ............................................................. ........................... 1 7 1 Effects of Immigration & Inbreeding on Addax Populations: Mace .. 17 5 Captive Population Information ......................................................................... 1 8 3 Addax Management and Molecular Genetic Techniques: Patton .... .. 1 9 1 Gazelles Summary of Gazelle Plan ...... .......... .... .. .... ... .... .... .... ...... .. ...... .. .. ... ...... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. ... 1 9 7 Effect of Inbreeding and Body Size on Reproductive Success in Female Cuvier's, Dama and Dorcas Gazelles: Alados and Escos.. 199 Niger Reintroduction Overview of Reintroduction .................................................................................. 2 11 The Reintroduction of Addax into the Air and Tenere National Nature Reserve Republic of Niger: Dixon, Knowles, and Newby ... 213 Feasibility Study for the Establishment of a West African Regional Captive Breeding Centre: Dixon and Newby ...................... 2 2 1 Appendix I A Threat to Wildlife - The New World Screwworm in North Africa ..................................................................................................................... 237 Recommendations for Veterinary Investigations Prior to a Reintroduction Project by Michael Woodford ...................................... 2 3 9 Review of Current Molecular Genetic Projects on Aridland Antelopes: Spevak ........................... ............ ................ ........ .... ... ................. 2 4 1 Regional Antelope Stocking Policy for Australian & New Zealand Zoos ........................................................................................................................ 244 Appendix II Agenda .......................................................................................................................... 25 5 Minutes .......... .............. .. ........................ ... .. .. .......... ... ... ... .... .. .. .......... .. .. ........ .. .... ... .... .. 2 5 8 Pru-ticipa.tlts ................................................................. .,............................................... 2 7 4 Appendix III Bibliography: Estes.................................................................................................. 2 8 1 CBSG ARIDLAND ANTELOPE WORKSHOP San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A. 13-15 September, 1989 OVERVIEWS 1 February 1990 SURVEY OF ARTIODAC'IYLA IN CAPTIVITY Karen Sausman September 13, 1989 A survey of the order Artiodactyla in captivity was undertaken using data from the following sources: the International Species Information System (ISIS), data as of December 31, 1988; the International Zoo Yearbook (IZY), data for 1985/86; Australia and New Zealand (AZDANZ) data as of June 1989; Texas Department of Fish and Game Texas Ranch Survey data as of March, 1989; Antelope Specialist Group (ASG) surveys published in 1988 and 1989, and various other sources. The survey covered 527 forms (species and subspecies). The total captive population of artiodactyla is over 34,600 individuals ranging in size from dik-dik to giraffe and ranging in habitat from aquatic pygmy hippos to desert antelope. Table 1 provides a summary of the captive population by families. Of the 527 forms, 154 are listed in either the IUCN Red Data Book, or CITES, or the USDI endangered species list at some level, and 115 of those are in captivity. Table 2 provides reviews of the threatened/protected captive population and the total captive population based on the physical size of the species, and on those species requiring "mountain" habitat. It has been compiled for use in reviewing current and potential captive habitat for future breeding programs. The final portion of this report, Table 3, is a list of 126 species and/or subspecies which are listed in the Red Data Book as endangered, or are CITES 1, or are considered at risk by the Antelope Specialist Group of the IUCN. These include 2 hogs, 1 peccary, 2 muntjac, 31 deer, 13 wild cattle, 6 duikers, 44 antelope and gazelles, and 25 goats, goat-antelope or sheep. 2 Of the 126 forms on the list, only 13 have captive populations that are greater than 100: Ce!Vus duvauceli Ce!Vus eldi thamin Ce!Vus nippon taiquanus Bos guarus Kobus leche leche Oryx dammah Oryx leucoryx Addax nasomaculatus Gazella dama Gazella dama mhorr Gazella dama ruficollis Gazella leptoceros Hemitraqus jayakari Following the name of each species is its status in the wild and then its current captive population as reported by ISIS, IZY and, if existing, the international studbook. Also included are IZY population figures for 1976 which can be used as a quick, rough reference on whether the captive population is increasing, decreasing, etc. The information given on recorded births and captive populations by continent might also help provide a more complete picture of each species' captive status. Under the heading "Some Captive Locations" can be found the locations of some of the larger captive collections, the Texas ranch figures (TXRAN), and current AZDANZ populations (AZD). The last section of this report is a review of status in captivity of all forms of artiodactyla. Many individuals provided information for this survey, among them Nate Flesness, Tom Foose, Jim Dolan, Larry Killmar, Peter Olney, Bruce Read and Paul Garland. 3 TABLE 1 STATUS HI CAPTIVITY SUI'IIIARY QF ALL ARTIODACTYLS COI'If'!Oii NAI'IE TOTAl NO. HU. OF NO. OF ROB/PROT POP EST CAPT.POP EST. TOTAL SENUS. SPECIES FORI'IS RDB/PROT CAPTIVE ISISSS liON RllB/PRDT CAPT.POP IN FORMS RDB/PROi !!Y95 ISISSS ISISBB REPORT IN REPORT FORIIS SiBK IZYS6 !t=ESi> !ZYB5i6 \f=ESTl ALL PISS ~ PECCARIES 39 7 rsrs-H 313 ~0 IZY-76-f 1187i !263+ r: ALL HIPPOS " 2 2 rsiS-96 113 209 !ZY-191 120-f 311f 'r ALL CAI'IELS ~ LLAMAS 9 ·J ISIS-185 BS1 1066 !ZY-597t 1620f 221it AlL MUMTJACS 11 2 2 ISIS-2 3S7 359 iiUHTiACUS m-s 720-t 725-t ALL MUUSE DEER 5 0 ISIS-!) 67 67 IZY-Q 83 53 ALL MUSK DEER 3 2 rsrs-4 0 4 IZY-31 0 31 AU. DEER !M THE SEMUS CERVUS o9 26 16 ISIS-700 1067 1773 IZY-22~6 5681! Jf17it .... ALL OTHER DEER.~OSE ~ CARIBOU 51 15 !S!s-!35 b32 !Ol !Z'f-!65 1701f 1866! ALL GIRAFFES ~ OKAPI lt) i) i) ISIS-() r:~~.-VI 51)7 IZY-;) 441 '41 'r i~Ci t~t:: ALL PRONGHORN i) ISIS-0 hlv .;...,.., 6 " m-o 6B ~a ALL CATTLE 29 11? 11 ISIS-4-73 648 q?t..... !ZY-784f 15Vf 1734i ALL DU!KERS 24 12 9 ISIS-92 =~ 146 CE?HALOPHUS IZY-130f 53? 1!!3~ ALL ANTELOPES &GAZELLES 174 36 36 !SIS-1808 3021 5429 !ZY-3034 8658 11692 ALL SOAiS.SOAT-ANTELDFE ~ SHEEP 92 24 24 !SIS-710 1533 2243 IZY-4121 1907 b028 ALL ARi!OOACTfLS c;~~..,J.l 154 !15 rsrs-4z:e 9923 14196 I \ IH-t1430i 23199 !4619~ S4 5 ACTION PLAN FOR ARTIODACTYLA September 15, 1989 A survey of 527 taxa of artiodactyla shows a captive population of over 34,600 individuals ranging in size from dik-dik to giraffe and ranging in habitat from aquatic pygmy hippos to desert antelope. Of these 527 taxa, 154 are listed in the IUCN Red Data Book, CITES or the USDI endangered species list. One hundred and twenty-six of those are either Red Data Book Endangered or CITES 1 or have been identified by the IUCN Antelope Specialist Group as being at risk or in need of captive propagation. These include 2 hogs, 1 peccary, 2 muntjac, 31 deer, 13 wild cattle, 6 duikers, 44 antelopes and gazelles, and 25 goats, goat-antelope or sheep. Of the 126 taxa that are seriously threatened, about half ( 69) have some known captive population and 19 of these are part of a captive program (studbook, SSP, EEP, etc). Only 13 taxa have captive populations
Recommended publications
  • Distribution, Utilization and Management of the Extra-Limital Common Warthog (Phacochoerus Africanus) in South Africa
    Distribution, utilization and management of the extra-limital common warthog (Phacochoerus africanus) in South Africa Monlee Swanepoel Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Conservation Ecology and Entomology) in the Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University Promoter: Prof Louwrens C. Hoffman Co-Promoter: Dr. Alison J. Leslie March 2016 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained herein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously submitted it, in its entirety or in part, for obtaining any qualification. Date: March 2016 Copyright © 2016 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements I wish to express my sincere gratitude and appreciation to the following persons and institutions: My supervisors, Dr. Alison J. Leslie and Prof. Louwrens C. Hoffman for invaluable assistance, expertise, contribution and support and patience. The Meat Science team of Department of Animal Sciences at Stellenbosch University, including the technical and support staff for their extensive assistance, support and encouragement Academics, staff and colleagues of this institution and others for their contribution and assistance. An especial thank you to Prof. Martin Kidd, Marieta van der Rijst, Nina Muller, Erika Moelich, Lisa Uys, Gail Jordaan, Greta Geldenhuys, Michael Mlambo, Janine Booyse, Cheryl Muller, John Achilles, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosomal Evolution in Raphicerus Antelope Suggests Divergent X
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Chromosomal evolution in Raphicerus antelope suggests divergent X chromosomes may drive speciation through females, rather than males, contrary to Haldane’s rule Terence J. Robinson1*, Halina Cernohorska2, Svatava Kubickova2, Miluse Vozdova2, Petra Musilova2 & Aurora Ruiz‑Herrera3,4 Chromosome structural change has long been considered important in the evolution of post‑zygotic reproductive isolation. The premise that karyotypic variation can serve as a possible barrier to gene fow is founded on the expectation that heterozygotes for structurally distinct chromosomal forms would be partially sterile (negatively heterotic) or show reduced recombination. We report the outcome of a detailed comparative molecular cytogenetic study of three antelope species, genus Raphicerus, that have undergone a rapid radiation. The species are largely conserved with respect to their euchromatic regions but the X chromosomes, in marked contrast, show distinct patterns of heterochromatic amplifcation and localization of repeats that have occurred independently in each lineage. We argue a novel hypothesis that postulates that the expansion of heterochromatic blocks in the homogametic sex can, with certain conditions, contribute to post‑ zygotic isolation. i.e., female hybrid incompatibility, the converse of Haldane’s rule. This is based on the expectation that hybrids incur a selective disadvantage due to impaired meiosis resulting from the meiotic checkpoint network’s surveillance of the asymmetric expansions of heterochromatic blocks in the homogametic sex. Asynapsis of these heterochromatic regions would result in meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin and, if this persists, germline apoptosis and female infertility. Te chromosomal speciation theory 1,2 also referred to as the “Hybrid dysfunction model”3, has been one of the most intriguing questions in biology for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Boselaphus Tragocamelus</I>
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey 2008 Boselaphus tragocamelus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) David M. Leslie Jr. U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Leslie, David M. Jr., "Boselaphus tragocamelus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae)" (2008). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 723. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/723 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. MAMMALIAN SPECIES 813:1–16 Boselaphus tragocamelus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) DAVID M. LESLIE,JR. United States Geological Survey, Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit and Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078-3051, USA; [email protected] Abstract: Boselaphus tragocamelus (Pallas, 1766) is a bovid commonly called the nilgai or blue bull and is Asia’s largest antelope. A sexually dimorphic ungulate of large stature and unique coloration, it is the only species in the genus Boselaphus. It is endemic to peninsular India and small parts of Pakistan and Nepal, has been extirpated from Bangladesh, and has been introduced in the United States (Texas), Mexico, South Africa, and Italy. It prefers open grassland and savannas and locally is a significant agricultural pest in India. It is not of special conservation concern and is well represented in zoos and private collections throughout the world. DOI: 10.1644/813.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitzhenry Yields 2016.Pdf
    Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ii DECLARATION By submitting this dissertation electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: March 2016 Copyright © 2016 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za iii GENERAL ABSTRACT Fallow deer (Dama dama), although not native to South Africa, are abundant in the country and could contribute to domestic food security and economic stability. Nonetheless, this wild ungulate remains overlooked as a protein source and no information exists on their production potential and meat quality in South Africa. The aim of this study was thus to determine the carcass characteristics, meat- and offal-yields, and the physical- and chemical-meat quality attributes of wild fallow deer harvested in South Africa. Gender was considered as a main effect when determining carcass characteristics and yields, while both gender and muscle were considered as main effects in the determination of physical and chemical meat quality attributes. Live weights, warm carcass weights and cold carcass weights were higher (p < 0.05) in male fallow deer (47.4 kg, 29.6 kg, 29.2 kg, respectively) compared with females (41.9 kg, 25.2 kg, 24.7 kg, respectively), as well as in pregnant females (47.5 kg, 28.7 kg, 28.2 kg, respectively) compared with non- pregnant females (32.5 kg, 19.7 kg, 19.3 kg, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Beatragus Hunteri) in Arawale National Reserve, Northeastern, Kenya
    The population size, abundance and distribution of the Critically Endangered Hirola Antelope (Beatragus hunteri) in Arawale National Reserve, Northeastern, Kenya. Francis Kamau Muthoni Terra Nuova, Transboundary Environmental Project, P.O. Box 74916, Nairobi, Kenya Email: [email protected] 1.0. Abstract. This paper outlines the spatial distribution, population size, habitat preferences and factors causing the decline of Hirola antelope in Arawale National Reserve (ANR) in Garissa and Ijara districts, north eastern Kenya. The reserve covers an area of 540Km2. The objectives of the study were to gather baseline information on hirola distribution, population size habitat preferences and human activities impacting on its existence. A sampling method using line transect count was used to collect data used to estimate the distribution of biological populations (Norton-Griffiths, 1978). Community scouts collected data using Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and recorded on standard datasheets for 12 months. Transect walks were done from 6.00Am to 10.00Am every 5th day of the month. The data was entered into a geo-database and analysed using Arcmap, Ms Excel and Access. The results indicate that the population of hirola in Arawale National Reserve were 69 individuals comprising only 6% of the total population in the natural geographic range of hirola estimated to be 1,167 individuals. It also revealed that hirola prefer open bushes and grasslands. The decline of the Hirola on its natural range is due to a combination of factors, including, habitat loss and degradation, competition with livestock, poaching and drought. Key words: Hirola Antelope Beatragus hunteri, GIS, Endangered Species 2.0. Introduction. The Hirola antelope (Beatragus hunteri) is a “Critically Endangered” species endemic to a small area in Southeast Kenya and Southwest Somalia.
    [Show full text]
  • African Mammals (Tracks)
    L Gi'. M MM S C A POCKET NATURALISru GUIDE HOOFED MAMMALS Dik-Dik Madoqua spp . To 17 in. (43 cm) H Small antelope has a long, flexible snout. .,9-10 in. Common Hippopotamus Klipspringer Hippopotamus amphibius Oreatragus oreotroqus To 5 ft. (1.5 m) H To 2 ft. (60 cm) H Has dark 'tear stains' at the corner of the eyes. Downward-pointing hooves give the impression it walks on 'tiptoe'. Found in rocky habitats. White Black Steenbok Raphieerus eampestris 1 in. White Rhinoceros To 2 ft. (60 cm) H Large ears are striped inside. Ceratotherium simum Muzzle has a dark stripe. To 6 ft. (l.B m) H 9-10 in. t Has a square upper lip. The similar black rhinoceros has a , pointed, prehensile upper lip. t . eWhite '~'rBlack . Common Duiker " . Sylvieapra grimmia ". To 28 in. (70 cm) t1 t Has a prominent black 1 in. 'a: stripe on its snout. Inhabits woodlands Hyena lion and shrubby areas. t Forefoot , e+ Oribi 24-28 in. Ourebia ourebi African Elephant To 2 ft. (60 em) H Note short tail and black 1.5 in. Loxodonto africana Hind foot spot below ears. Inhabits To 14 ft. (4.2 m) H grassland savannas. Hind print is oval-shaped. t This guide provides simplified field reference to familiar animal tracks. It is important to note that tracks change depending on their age, the surface Hippopotamus they are made on, and the animal's gait (e.g., toes are often splayed when Springbok running). Track illustrations are ordered by size in each section and are not Antidorcas marsupialis To 30 in.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Support for Rangeland‐Restoration Practices by Rural Somalis
    Animal Conservation. Print ISSN 1367-9430 Evaluating support for rangeland-restoration practices by rural Somalis: an unlikely win-win for local livelihoods and hirola antelope? A. H. Ali1,2,3 ,R.Amin4, J. S. Evans1,5, M. Fischer6, A. T. Ford7, A. Kibara3 & J. R. Goheen1 1 Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA 2 National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya 3 Hirola Conservation Programme, Garissa, Kenya 4 Conservation Programmes, Zoological Society of London, London, UK 5 The Nature Conservancy, Fort Collins, CO, USA 6 Center for Conservation in the Horn of Africa, St. Louis Zoo, St. Louis, MO, USA 7 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada Keywords Abstract Beatragus hunteri; elephant; endangered species; habitat degradation; rangeland; In developing countries, governments often lack the authority and resources to restoration; tree encroachment; antelope. implement conservation outside of protected areas. In such situations, the integra- tion of conservation with local livelihoods is crucial to species recovery and rein- Correspondence troduction efforts. The hirola Beatragus hunteri is the world’s most endangered Abdullahi H. Ali, Department of Zoology and antelope, with a population of <500 individuals that is restricted to <5% of its his- Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, torical geographic range on the Kenya–Somali border. Long-term hirola declines WY, USA. have been attributed to a combination of disease and rangeland degradation. Tree Email: [email protected] encroachment—driven by some combination of extirpation of elephants, overgraz- ing by livestock, and perhaps fire suppression—is at least partly responsible for Editor: Darren Evans habitat loss and the decline of contemporary populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of South African Wildlife. XIX. the Prevalence of Helminths in Some Common Antelopes, Warthogs and a Bushpig in the Limpopo Province, South Africa
    Page 1 of 11 Original Research Parasites of South African wildlife. XIX. The prevalence of helminths in some common antelopes, warthogs and a bushpig in the Limpopo province, South Africa Authors: Little work has been conducted on the helminth parasites of artiodactylids in the northern 1 Ilana C. van Wyk and western parts of the Limpopo province, which is considerably drier than the rest of the Joop Boomker1 province. The aim of this study was to determine the kinds and numbers of helminth that Affiliations: occur in different wildlife hosts in the area as well as whether any zoonotic helminths were 1Department of Veterinary present. Ten impalas (Aepyceros melampus), eight kudus (Tragelaphus strepsiceros), four blue Tropical Diseases, University wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus), two black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou), three gemsbok of Pretoria, South Africa (Oryx gazella), one nyala (Tragelaphus angasii), one bushbuck (Tragelaphus scriptus), one Correspondence to: waterbuck (Kobus ellipsiprymnus), six warthogs (Phacochoerus aethiopicus) and a single bushpig Ilana van Wyk (Potamochoerus porcus) were sampled from various localities in the semi-arid northern and western areas of the Limpopo province. Email: [email protected] New host–parasite associations included Trichostrongylus deflexus from blue wildebeest, Postal address: Agriostomum gorgonis from black wildebeest, Stilesia globipunctata from the waterbuck and Private bag X04, Fasciola hepatica in a kudu. The mean helminth burden, including extra-gastrointestinal Onderstepoort 0110, South Africa helminths, was 592 in impalas, 407 in kudus and blue wildebeest, 588 in black wildebeest, 184 in gemsbok, and 2150 in the waterbuck. Excluding Probstmayria vivipara, the mean helminth Dates: burden in warthogs was 2228 and the total nematode burden in the bushpig was 80.
    [Show full text]
  • Vega Etal Procroyalsocb Synchronous Diversification
    Canterbury Christ Church University’s repository of research outputs http://create.canterbury.ac.uk Please cite this publication as follows: Frantz, Laurent A. F., Rudzinski, A., Mansyursyah Surya Nugraha, A., Evin, A., Burton, J., Hulme-Beaman, A., Linderholm, A., Barnett, R., Vega, R., Irving-Pease, E., Haile, J., Allen, R., Leus, K., Shephard, J., Hillyer, M., Gillemot, S., van den Hurk, J., Ogle, S., Atofanei, C., Thomas, M., Johansson, F., Haris Mustari, A., Williams, J., Mohamad, K., Siska Damayanti, C., Djuwita Wiryadi, I., Obbles, D., Mona, S., Day, H., Yasin, M., Meker, S., McGuire, J., Evans, B., von Rintelen, T., Hoult, S., Searle, J., Kitchener, A., Macdonald, A., Shaw, D., Hall, R., Galbusera, P. and Larson, G. (2018) Synchronous diversification of Sulawesi’s iconic artiodactyls driven by recent geological events. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Link to official URL (if available): http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2566. This version is made available in accordance with publishers’ policies. All material made available by CReaTE is protected by intellectual property law, including copyright law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Contact: [email protected] Synchronous diversification of Sulawesi’s iconic artiodactyls driven by recent geological events Authors Laurent A. F. Frantz1,2,a,*, Anna Rudzinski3,*, Abang Mansyursyah Surya Nugraha4,c,*, , Allowen Evin5,6*, James Burton7,8*, Ardern Hulme-Beaman2,6, Anna Linderholm2,9, Ross Barnett2,10, Rodrigo Vega11 Evan K. Irving-Pease2, James Haile2,10, Richard Allen2, Kristin Leus12,13, Jill Shephard14,15, Mia Hillyer14,16, Sarah Gillemot14, Jeroen van den Hurk14, Sharron Ogle17, Cristina Atofanei11, Mark G.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Held Theory Is in Danger of Losing Its Nerve
    NEWS NATURE|Vol 449|13 September 2007 Mystery ox finds its identity The kouprey, an enigmatic Asian ox believed to be a hybrid — and so, unworthy of conservation efforts — is in fact a distinct species related to the banteng (a wild ox)1. The conclusion contradicts earlier findings2 that the horned beast is a cross between the banteng and domesticated zebu cattle. First identified in 1937 and last spotted in the 1980s, the kouprey (Bos sauveli) has become a symbol for conservation in southeast Asia. Some experts think that it is already extinct. Gary Galbreath, a biologist at Chicago’s Field Museum in Illinois who concluded that the kouprey was a hybrid, told CBS News: “It is surely desirable not to waste time and money trying to locate or conserve a domestic breed gone wild.” He based that conclusion on the observation that kouprey and banteng (Bos javanicus) shared several sequences of mitochondrial DNA. A reanalysis of research carried out at the Pasteur Institute casts doubt on a respected hypothesis. Now, Alexandre Hassanin and Anne Ropiquet of the National Natural History L. BORGHI Museum in Paris have sequenced three regions of mitochondrial DNA and five Long-held theory is in of non-coding nuclear DNA from seven related species, including kouprey. The pair found that kouprey have unique danger of losing its nerve sequences of both mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. Their data suggest that kouprey should indeed be a conservation A suite of seminal neuroscience papers by nerve cells in goldfish, called Mauthner cells. priority — if anyone can find one.
    [Show full text]
  • Slender-Horned Gazelle Gazella Leptoceros Conservation Strategy 2020-2029
    Slender-horned Gazelle Gazella leptoceros Conservation Strategy 2020-2029 Slender-horned Gazelle (Gazella leptoceros) Slender-horned Gazelle (:Conservation Strategy 2020-2029 Gazella leptoceros ) :Conservation Strategy 2020-2029 Conservation Strategy for the Slender-horned Gazelle Conservation Strategy for the Slender-horned Conservation Strategy for the Slender-horned The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of any participating organisation concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN or other participating organisations. Compiled and edited by David Mallon, Violeta Barrios and Helen Senn Contributors Teresa Abaígar, Abdelkader Benkheira, Roseline Beudels-Jamar, Koen De Smet, Husam Elalqamy, Adam Eyres, Amina Fellous-Djardini, Héla Guidara-Salman, Sander Hofman, Abdelkader Jebali, Ilham Kabouya-Loucif, Maher Mahjoub, Renata Molcanova, Catherine Numa, Marie Petretto, Brigid Randle, Tim Wacher Published by IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group and Royal Zoological Society of Scotland, Edinburgh, United Kingdom Copyright ©2020 IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Recommended citation IUCN SSC ASG and RZSS. 2020. Slender-horned Gazelle (Gazella leptoceros): Conservation strategy 2020-2029. IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group and Royal Zoological Society of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • My Somali Book, a Record of Two Shooting Trips
    10 MY SOMALI BOOK to learn new things, and wonderfully bright and in- telligent. He is untiring on the march, often a reckless hunter, and will stand b}^ his master splendidly." And again, " I have made many jmigle trips in India and elsewhere, yet in no country have I had such obedient and cheerful followers and such pleasant native companions, despite their faults, as in Somali- land." This estimate is every bit as true as the other. The Somali of the interior is not, as a rule, dishonest, though he can be an exasperating liar on occasion. And he is usualty decent in his dress. Naturally indolent, he prefers to see the women do the work, but he has plenty of energy when he chooses to give it exercise, and in this respect is seen at his best on a shooting trip. And there is no doubt of his courage. A Mahomedan of the Shafai Sect, the Somali is sometimes very particular about his religious observances, but the Arab despises him as not a true Mahomedan at all. There is no occasion to detail the principal tribes, which are split up into innumerable sub-divisions. But mention must be made of the Midgdns, an outcast tribe of professional hunters. They hunt with bow and poisoned arrow, sometimes with dogs, and are wonderful trackers. As to the provision which the country makes for the hunter : the principal game to be met with in Northern Somaliland comprises Elephant, Black Rhinoceros, Lion, Leopard, Chita (hunting-leopard). MY SOMALI BOOK 11 Warthog, Ostrich, and twelve species of Antelope, to wit, Greater and Lesser Kudu, Or3^x (Beisa), Swa3aie's Hartebeest, Sommering's Gazelle (Somali-^Oi(/), Waller's Gazelle (Gerenuk), Clarke's Gazelle {Dibatag), Speke's and Pelzeln's Gazelles (both Dhero in Somali), Baira, Klipspringer {Alahlt) and Phillips' Dik-dik {Sdkdro).
    [Show full text]