DOCSLIB.ORG

Population Structure and Hybridization of Alaskan Caribou

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Population Structure and Hybridization of Alaskan Caribou POPULATION STRUCTURE AND HYBRIDIZATION OF ALASKAN CARIBOU AND REINDEER: INTEGRATING GENETICS AND LOCAL KNOWLEDGE By Karen H. Mager RECOMMENDED: APPROVED: Paul W. Layer Dean, College · ce and Mathematics La ce K. Duffy Dean ofthe Graduate School ~ 27, ~'2- Date POPULATION STRUCTURE AND HYBRIDIZATION OF ALASKAN CARIBOU AND REINDEER: INTEGRATING GENETICS AND LOCAL KNOWLEDGE A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the University ofAlaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment ofthe Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Karen H. Mager, B.A. Fairbanks, Alaska May 2012 iii Abstract Alaskan caribou (Rangifer tarandus granti) are a valued game species and a key grazer in Alaska's terrestrial ecosystem. Caribou herds, defined by female fidelity to calving grounds, are management units. However, the extent to which herds constitute genetic populations is unknown. Historical fluctuations in herd size, range, and distribution suggest periods ofcontact and isolation between herds. Likewise, historical contact between caribou and introduced domestic reindeer (R.t. tarandus) created opportunities for hybridization, but its extent is not known. I conducted an interdisciplinary study to understand how historical processes influence genetic identity and population structure ofcaribou and reindeer. Interviews with herders and hunters in Barrow, Alaska, revealed that many reindeer migrated away with caribou in the 1940s despite herder efforts to prevent mixing. Local observations of reindeer-like animals in caribou herds today suggest feral reindeer may survive and interbreed. Using genetic analysis ofNorth Slope caribou and Seward Peninsula reindeer (n = 312) at 19 microsatellite loci, I detected individuals with hybrid ancestry in all four caribou herds and in reindeer. Selective hunting of reindeer-like animals, along with herd size and natural selection, may remove reindeer from caribou herds over time. I used genetics ~s well to describe caribou population structure and determine how it is influenced by geography, historical demography, and ecotypes. I found that Alaskan caribou from 20 herds (n = 655) are subdivided into two genetic clusters: the Alaska Peninsula and the mainland. Alaska Peninsula herds are genetically distinct, while many mainland herds are not. I hypothesize that Alaska Peninsula herds have diverged due to post-glacial founder effects and recent bottlenecks driven by constraints to population size from marginal habitat and reduced gene flow across a habitat barrier at the nexus of the peninsula. I hypothesize that mainland herds have maintained genetic connectivity and large effective population size via range expansions and shifts over time. However, I find evidence that herds ofdifferent ecotypes (migratory, sedentary) can remain differentiated despite range overlap. Genetic evidence provides information for iv herd-based management, while also demonstrating the importance of spatial connectivity of herds and their habitats over the long-term. v Table of Contents Page Signature Page....................................................................................................................i Title Page............................................................................................................................ ii Abstract............................................................................................................................. iii Table of Contents .............................................................................................................. v List of Figures................................................................................................................... ix List of Tables .................................................................................................................... xi List ofAppendices........................................................................................................... xii General Acknowledgments ........................................................................................... xiii Chapter 1 General Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 Research Topic and Conceptual Framework ................................................................ 1 1.2 Study System ................................................................................................................ 2 1.2.1 Background ............................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Objectives, Methodology, and Outline ......................................................................... 6 1.4 References Cited ........................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2 "I'd Be Foolish to Tell You They Were Caribou:" Local Knowledge of Historical Interactions between Reindeer and Caribou in Barrow, Alaska••.••••••••••. 19 2.1 Abstract ....................................................................................................................... 19 2.3 Introduction................................................................................................................. 20 2.3.1 Background on Barrow Reindeer Herds .............................................................. 22 2.4 Methods....................................................................................................................... 24 2.4.1 Interview Participants and Procedures ................................................................. 24 2.4.2 Methodological Approach and Limitations ......................................................... 26 2.5 Role of Caribou in the Barrow Reindeer Decline ....................................................... 27 2.5.1 Reindeer Herder Responses to Caribou ............................................................... 29 2.5.2 Fluctuations in Caribou Population Size .............................................................. 30 2.5.3 Perceptions ofCaribou in the Reindeer Administration ...................................... 31 2.6 The Fate of Lost Reindeer and their Impact on Caribou Herds .................................. 35 Vl 2.6.1 Distinguishing Characteristics ofCaribou and Reindeer ..................................... 35 2.6.2 Persistence ofFeral Reindeer and Hybridization with Caribou ........................... 36 2.6.3 Cultural Implications of a Heritage with Reindeer and Caribou ......................... 40 2.7 Discussion ...............................................•................................................................... 42 2.8 Acknowledgments....................................................................................................... 46 2.9 Endnotes...................................................................................................................... 47 2.10 References Cited ....................................................................................................... 49 Chapter 3 Genetic Connectivity Between Caribou Herds and Hybridization with Domestic Reindeer in Northern Alaska ........................................................................ 66 3.1 Abstract ....................................................................................................................... 66 3.2 Introduction................................................................................................................. 66 3.3 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................ 70 3.3.1 Genetic Sampling ................................................................................................. 70 3.3.2 Geo-Spatial Data .................................................................................................. 71 3.3.3 Marker Selection and Genotyping ....................................................................... 71 3.3.4 Statistical Analysis - Herd Differentiation and Diversity .................................... 72 3.3.5 Analysis ofGenetic Population Structure ............................................................ 73 3.3.6 Landscape Genetic Analyses ............................................................................... 73 3.3.7 Hybridization and Reindeer Introgression Analysis ............................................ 74 3.4 Results......................................................................................................................... 75 3.4.1 Herd Differentiation and Diversity ...................................................................... 75 3.4.2 Overall Genetic Population Structure .................................................................. 75 3.4.3 Hybridization and Reindeer Introgression ........................................................... 76 3.5 Discussion ................................................................................................................... 77 3.5.1 Herd Differentiation ............................................................................................. 77 3.5.2 Genetic Population Structure ............................................................................... 78 3.5.3 Reindeer-Caribou Hybridization .......................................................................... 79 3.5.4 Constraints on Gene Flow and Hybridization in Large Populations ................... 82 3.5.5 Conclusions.........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 201026 BOEM Oil Spill Occurrence North Slope Draftforfinal
    OCS Study BOEM 2020-050 Oil Spill Occurrence Rates from Alaska North Slope Oil and Gas Exploration, Development, and Production US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska Region OCS Study BOEM 2020-050 Oil Spill Occurrence Rates from Alaska North Slope Oil and Gas Exploration, Development, and Production October / 2020 Authors: Tim Robertson, Nuka Research and Planning Group, Lead Author Lynetta K. Campbell, Statistical Consulting Services, Lead Analyst Sierra Fletcher, Nuka Research and Planning Group, Editor Prepared under contract #140M0119F0003 by Nuka Research and Planning Group, LLC P.O. Box 175 Seldovia, AK 99663 10 Samoset Street Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska Region DISCLAIMER Study concept, oversight, and funding were provided by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Environmental Studies Program, Washington, DC, under Contract Number 140M0119F0003. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the US Government, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Data and Information Systems webpage (http://www.boem.gov/Environmental-Studies- EnvData/), click on the link for the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS), and search on 2020-050. The report is also available at the National Technical Reports Library at https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribou Rangifer Tarandus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus Dolphin and Union population in Canada ENDANGERED 2017 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2017. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Caribou, Dolphin and Union population, Rangifer tarandus, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xii + 51 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Previous report(s): COSEWIC 2004. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Peary caribou Rangifer tarandus pearyi and the barren-ground caribou Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus (Dolphin and Union population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 91 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Gunn, A., F.L. Miller and D.C. Thomas. 1979. COSEWIC status report on the Peary caribou Rangifer tarandus pearyi in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 40 pp. Miller, F.L. 1991. Update COSEWIC status report on the Peary caribou Rangifer tarandus pearyi in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 124 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Lee Harding (SciWrite Environmental Sciences Ltd.) for writing the draft status report on the Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Dolphin and Union population in Canada, and Justina Ray for writing the revised provisional report. This report was prepared under contract with Environment and Climate Change Canada and overseen by Graham Forbes, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Species Specialist Subcommittee.
    [Show full text]
  • 801—Arctic Energy
    North Slope oil and gas - a short history Contents Oil and gas development brought statehood for Alaska, a large and consistent revenue stream for state and local gov- 3 North Slope oil and gas ernments, a $33 billion savings account for Alaskans to enjoy and indoor plumbing and schools for many rural resi- 4 Viscous oil dents, including those who live on the North Slope. 4 Most frequently asked questions Most of Alaska’s oil comes from the 24 producing fields on the North Slope, including Prudhoe Bay, one of the 5 Facts about Alaska largest oil fields in the world. North Slope production totals about 900,000 barrels of oil per day. While the huge Prudhoe Bay field is in gradual decline, North Slope oil fields 5 Economic impact still provide a significant amount of U.S. domestic produc- tion. 6 Who we are An 800-mile-long pipeline carries North Slope oil to tide- 7 Natural gas water where it is transferred to tankers for transport to downstream markets. 8-13 North Slope oil fields Oil was first discovered on the North Slope thousands of 14-17 Drilling technology years ago. Native Eskimos cut blocks of oil-soaked tundra from natural seeps to use as fuel. But the first real search 18-19 Oil production for oil didn’t begin until the late 1920s when hearty explor- ers traveled by dog team, foot and boat. 20-21 Getting oil to market, TAPS The first geologic surveys took place on Alaska’s North Slope in the late 1950s and early 1960s and in 1968, after 22-23 Double hull tankers nearly a dozen unsuccessful wells, or “dry holes,” a major discovery was made.
    [Show full text]
  • TB1066 Current Stateof Knowledge and Research on Woodland
    June 2020 A Review of the Relationship Between Flow,Current Habitat, State and of Biota Knowledge in LOTIC and SystemsResearch and on Methods Woodland for Determining Caribou Instreamin Canada Low Requirements 9491066 Current State of Knowledge and Research on Woodland Caribou in Canada No 1066 June 2020 Prepared by Kevin A. Solarik, PhD NCASI Montreal, Quebec National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. Acknowledgments A great deal of thanks is owed to Dr. John Cook of NCASI for his considerable insight and the revisions he provided in improving earlier drafts of this report. Helpful comments on earlier drafts were also provided by Kirsten Vice, NCASI. For more information about this research, contact: Kevin A. Solarik, PhD Kirsten Vice NCASI NCASI Director of Forestry Research, Canada and Vice President, Sustainable Manufacturing and Northeastern/Northcentral US Canadian Operations 2000 McGill College Avenue, 6th Floor 2000 McGill College Avenue, 6th Floor Montreal, Quebec, H3A 3H3 Canada Montreal, Quebec, H3A 3H3 Canada (514) 907-3153 (514) 907-3145 [email protected] [email protected] To request printed copies of this report, contact NCASI at [email protected] or (352) 244-0900. Cite this report as: NCASI. 2020. Current state of knowledge and research on woodland caribou in Canada. Technical Bulletin No. 1066. Cary, NC: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. Errata: September 2020 - Table 3.1 (page 34) and Table 5.2 (pages 55-57) were edited to correct omissions and typos in the data. © 2020 by the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Caribou (Rangifer tarandus) is a species of deer that lives in the tundra, taiga, and forest habitats at high latitudes in the northern hemisphere, including areas of Russia and Scandinavia, the United States, and Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribou Trails 2008
    Tuttut tumai (Inupiaq) Caribou Trails bedzeyh tene (Koyukon Athabaskan) tuntut tumait (Yup’ik) Marci Johnson, NPS issue 9 Fall 2008 News from The Western Arctic Caribou Herd working group Your 2008-2009 Times are changing Caribou Working Group Caribou are facing change in many forms. Global warming brings with it increasing wildfires, Representatives: decreasing lichens, expanding shrubs, melting permafrost, and other unknowns. Industrial oil, gas and mineral development brings with it site construction, roads, pipelines, power lines, potential spills and contamination. The warming climate is also causing a retreat of sea ice, which will open the Arctic to Wainwright, Atqasuk an even greater expansion of resource exploration and development. These are all changes that may & Barrow potentially impact the Western Arctic Caribou Herd, and any change that affects caribou also affects Enoch Oktollik, Wainwright caribou hunters and all who value caribou. Point Hope & Point Lay protecting caribou Teddy Frankson, Pt. Hope for the future The mission of the Caribou Working Group Nuiqsut & Anaktuvuk The Caribou Working Group includes subsistence Isaac Kaigelak, Nuiqsut hunters living within the range of the Western Arctic “To work together to ensure Caribou Herd, other Alaskan hunters, reindeer herders, the long term conservation Noatak & Kivalina hunting guides, transporters, and conservationists. Raymond Hawley, Kivalina The group meets as a whole once or twice a year, with of the Western Arctic additional sub-committees meeting throughout the year Caribou Herd and the Kotzebue Attamuk Shiedt, Sr., Kotzebue as specific needs arise. ecosystem on which it At each general meeting biologists report on the current depends, and to maintain Lower Kobuk River health and population status of the herd, the condition traditional and other uses Raymond Stoney, Kiana of their range, and biological factors affecting the herd.
    [Show full text]
  • A Changing Arctic: Ecological Consequences for Tundra, Streams and Lakes
    A CHANGING ARCTIC: ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES FOR TUNDRA, STREAMS AND LAKES Edited by John E. Hobbie George W. Kling Chapter 1. Introduction Chapter 2. Climate and Hydrometeorology of the Toolik Lake Region and the Kuparuk River Basin: Past, Present, and Future Chapter 3. Glacial History and Long-Term Ecology of the Toolik Lake Region Chapter 4. Late-Quaternary Environmental and Ecological History of the Arctic Foothills, Northern Alaska Chapter 5. Terrestrial Ecosystems Chapter 6. Land-Water Interactions Research Chapter 7. Ecology of Streams of the Toolik Region Chapter 8. The Response of Arctic-LTER Lakes to Environmental Change Chapter 9. Mercury in the Alaskan Arctic Chapter 10. Ecological consequences of present and future change 1 <1>Chapter 1. Introduction John E. Hobbie <1>Description of the Arctic LTER site and project Toolik, the field site of the Arctic Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) project, lies 170 km south of Prudhoe Bay in the foothills of Alaska’s North Slope near the Toolik Field Station (TFS) of the University of Alaska Fairbanks (Fig. 1.1).[INSERT FIGURE 1.1 HERE] The project goal is to describe the communities of organisms and their ecology, to measure changes that are occurring, and to predict the ecology of this region in the next century. Research at the Toolik Lake site began in the summer of 1975 when the completion of the gravel road alongside the Trans-Alaska Pipeline, now called the Dalton Highway, opened the road-less North Slope for research. This book synthesizes the research results from this site since 1975, as supported by various government agencies but mainly by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • North Slope Regional Food Security Workshop
    North Slope Regional Food Security Workshop: How to Assess Food Security from an Inuit Perspective: Building a Conceptual Framework on How to Assess Food Security in the Alaskan Arctic November 2013. North Slope Regional Food Security Workshop Participants and Observers. Photo: Carolina Behe. 2013 On November 13th and 14th, 2013 Traditional Knowledge (TK) Experts came together to evaluate and validate preliminary findings of the Inuit Circumpolar Council – Alaska’s (ICC-AK) food security project, How to Assess Food Security from an Inuit Perspective: Building a Conceptual Framework on How to Assess Food Security in the Alaskan Arctic. The North Slope food security workshop is an important part of the overall project methodology, allowing for greater engagement of Arctic villages and a preliminary validation process. TK experts were identified by their respective Tribal Councils and peers, to validate and evaluate the information that was previously documented through expert interviews and offer further insight on drivers of food security and insecurity. The following report provides an overview of the workshop proceedings. This report reviews the information discussed during the North Slope Food Security workshop, as well as information gleaned from our other project activities to date. This report will be one component of several that will contribute to our final assessment tool and definition of Inuit food security and drivers of food in/security. This report should be cited as: Behe, Carolina. Inuit Circumpolar Council - Alaska. North Slope Regional Food Security Workshop: How to Assess Food Security from an Inuit Perspective: Building a Conceptual Framework on How to Assess Food Security in the Alaskan Arctic.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics of Undiscovered Oil and Gas in the North Slope of Alaska: Economic Update and Synthesis
    Economics of Undiscovered Oil and Gas in the North Slope of Alaska: Economic Update and Synthesis By Emil D. Attanasi and Philip A. Freeman Open-File Report 2009–1112 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2009 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Attanasi, E.D., and Freeman, P.A., 2009, Economics of undiscovered oil and gas in the North Slope of Alaska; Economic update and synthesis: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009–1112, 59 p., available only online. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Cover: Map showing the Alaska North Slope assessment study area, which consists of Federal, Native, and State lands in the 1002 Area of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, the central North Slope, the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (NPRA), and the western North Slope (area west of the NPRA). See figure 1 in text.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2018 Trends.Indd
    FEBRUARY 2018 Volume 38 Number 2 ISSN 0160-3345 The NORTH SLOPE OIL PATCH Jobs in some of the na on’s largest oil fi elds PAGE 4 By NEAL FRIED BEST ESTIMATES SHOW ONGOING JOB LOSS Clearing up some poten ally confusing data PAGE 9 By DAN ROBINSON GAUGING ALASKA’s ECONOMY PAGE 14 To sign up for a free electronic subscrip on, read past issues online, or purchase a print subscrip on, visit labor.alaska.gov/trends. Contact the editor at (907) 465-6561 or [email protected]. ALASKA DEPARTMENT of LABOR Dan Robinson Sara Whitney Sam Dapcevich and WORKFORCE Chief, Research and Analysis Editor Cover Ar st DEVELOPMENT Bill Walker Governor ON THE COVER: BP’s Lisburne Produc on Center at Prudhoe Bay, photo courtesy of BP Alaska Heidi Drygas ON PAGE 4: Deadhorse, photo by Flickr user Dan Love Commissioner h ps://crea vecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode Alaska Economic Trends is a monthly publica on meant to objec vely inform the public about a variety of economic issues in the state. Trends is funded by the Employment and Training Services Division of the Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development and is published by the department’s Research and Analysis Sec on. Material in this publica on is public informa on, and with appropriate credit may be reproduced without permission. 2 FEBRUARY 2018 ALASKA ECONOMIC TRENDS Gas project will create thousands of jobs for Alaskans The oil and gas sector is the largest pri- training centers, career and technical vate economic driver in the state, and education providers, registered appren- this month’s edition of Trends examines ticeship programs, and the University of employment in North Slope oil fi elds.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing Life History Traits from Bone Histology in Extant and Fossil Ruminants
    Departament de Biologia Animal Biologia Vegetal i Ecologia Reconstructing life history traits from bone histology in extant and fossil ruminants Memòria presentada per Miren Nekane Marín Moratalla per a optar al títol de Doctor en Biologia, programa de doctorat en Biodiversitat del Departament de Biologia Animal Biologia Vegetal i Ecologia de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, dirigida per: ‐ Dra. Meike Köhler, ICREA a l’Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont i professora associada al Departament d’Ecologia de la Universitat de Barcelona. ‐ Dr. Xavier Jordana, Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont. Dra. Meike Köhler Dr. Xavier Jordana Miren Nekane Marín Moratalla TESI DOCTORAL 2014 ABSTRACT The study of life histories is of special importance because it provides valuable insights into ecological conditions, biodiversity, demography, vulnerability and many other aspects of a species’ biology. Bone histology is a widely used tool to reconstruct vertebrate life histories, either by analysing primary bone tissue or by counting the number of growth marks (skeletochronology). However, it has long been considered that endotherms, unlike ectotherms, display a continuous or noncyclical bone growth, disabling bone histology for life history inferences in mammals. The general purpose of the research presented in this PhD Thesis is to challenge this statement, contributing to the foundations of mammalian bone histology as a tool for inferences on life history strategies. The specific aims are: i) to analyse the reliability of the skeletochronology in mammalian bone, ii) to explore the association of bone tissue features with environment, physiology, ontogeny and life history, and finally iii) to reconstruct life history traits in fossil and living mammals to get insights on life history evolution and conservation biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 2 SUBMISSION to the NUNAVUT WILDLIFE
    SUBMISSION TO THE NUNAVUT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR Information: Decision: X Issue: Downlisting of Peary Caribou from Endangered to Threatened. Background: In October 2016 the Committee on the Status of Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) provided a re‐ assessment of Peary Caribou to the federal Minister of the Environment. This begins the formal listing process under the federal Species at Risk Act. Peary Caribou, which are currently listed under the federal SARA as Endangered, have been re‐assessed by COSEWIC in a lower risk category as Threatened. A recovery strategy is required for both Endangered and Threatened species. If Peary Caribou are downlisted under the federal SARA, a recovery strategy will still be required and it will not affect the current recovery strategy development process currently underway for Peary Caribou GN - Morgan Anderson Community consultations on the proposed downlisting of Peary Caribou were held with hunters and trappers organizations (HTOs) and regional wildlife boards in the range of Peary Caribou between June and August 2017. Organizations were asked to provide their formal position on the proposed downlisting and with any other comments, concerns or information that they feel should be considered. Consultation packages, in Inuktitut and English, were sent by mail and email. They included: a letter, information on the assessment and a questionnaire/response form. Follow‐up calls to the HTOs and RWBs were made on September 27, 2017. Results of Consultation: Kitikmeot Regional Wildlife Board No response
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL INDEX When a Village Resident Is Mentioned Only Once, the Page Reference for This Individual Is Usually Included Only Un
    GENERAL INDEX When a village resident is mentioned only once, the page reference for this individual is usually included only under the general family category. Personal names mentioned in the epilogue are indexed separately. Numerals in bold refer to photographs. Abloogalook, Matrona [nèe Borenin], 248 Akun, 52, 58, 59, 64, 70, 75, 95 Akutan, 4, 17, 53, 58, 70.75, 87, 88, 92, 95, 96, 102, 109, 111, 113, 114, 118, 119, 121, 141, 201, 210, 217, 222, 266-267, 270 A.C. Company, 102, 109, 111 established, 70, 75 fox trapping, 140 illness, poverty, starvation, 53, 58, 121, 123, 145, 146 income compared with Pribilof Islands, 88 reindeer, 184 skin boats, 142-143 whaling station, 142, 145, 153, 179, 181 World War II, 227, 230, 231, 233, 235, 236, 241, 247-251, 253-255 Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge, 276 Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), 266 Alaska Commercial Company, 72, 73, 82, 90, 106, 116, 191, 202, 260, 267, 268 control over villages, 27, 74, 81, 83-85, 87, 121, 163 alcohol, 137, 152, 174, 181, 191, 212, 213, 219, 240 Aleut Corporation, 275, 283 Aleutian Islands Reservation, 139, 141, 180 Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association, 226, 267, 268, 276, 302 Aleutian World War II National Historic Area, 273 Alexei, [Bishop], see Alexander Panteleev Anderson Bay (Unalaska Is.), 140, 165, 166, 201 Antonin, [Bishop], 187 Applegate, Samuel, 5, 77, 106, 107, 137, 141 fox farming, 123, 136, 140 sea otter hunting, 112-114, 122, 123 Arkhimandritov, Illarion, 72 assimilation, 214, 266 Atka, 3, 4, 29, 52, 54, 61, 63, 65, 69, 72, 121,
    [Show full text]