DOCSLIB.ORG

Dod 4005.3-H, Part3-E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dod 4005.3-H, Part3-E DOD 41oo.33-INv MAY 1992 000 INVENTORY OF COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991 BY 000 COMPONENT, STATE, INSTALLATION, REASON COOE, AND FUNcTION UNITED STATES NAVY YR LAST YR NEXT ‘ ------------------- ‘---------------- FUNCTION -------------------- -----------/ WORK-YRS APPLIEO A76 A76 ~OOE TITLE CIV MIL TOTAL REvIEw- REVIEW S710 PEST MANAGEMENT 3 0 91 S716 MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATION 1 0 91 S716C MOTOR POOL OPERATION 10 0 91 S717 MOTOR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 3 0 9! S726 HEATING PLANTS AND SYSTEMS 17 91 S729 AIR CONDITIONING AND REFRIGERANT“ION PLANTS 18 : 91 W824 OATA PROCESSING SERVICES 12 0 91 Z993 GROUNDS AND SURFACED AREAS 15 91 Z999 OTHER MAINTENANCE REPAIR ALTERA,TIoN 8t MINOR CONST . OF REAL PROPERTY :: 0 SUETOTAL 166 15 (Z) RETAINED IN-HOUSE FOR REASONS NOT INCLUDED ABOVE S718 FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION 16 0 S8 S724 GUARO SERVICE 14 7 88 SUBTOTAL 30 7 TOTAL NAVMEDCOM NATCAPREG BETHESOA, MARYLAND 277 22 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: NAVMEORSCHINSTI TUTE BETHESOA, MARYLAND (0) COMMERCIAL SOURCE WOULD CAUSE UNACCEPTABLE DELAY OR DISRUPTION R660 ROT&E MANAGEMEN AND SUPPORT 62 143 205 88 93 SU8TOTAL 62 143 205 (x) COMMANDER IS NOT ScHEoUL NG COST STUDY R660 RDT&E MANAGEMEN’ ANO SUPPORT 17 0 17 88 93 SUBTOTAL 17 0 17 TOTAL NAVMEORSCHINSTITUTE 8ETHESOA, MARYLAND 79 143 222 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: NAVOPINTCEN SUITLAND. MARYLANO (D) COMMERCIAL SOURCE WOULO CAUSE UNACCEPTABLE DELAY OR DISRUPTION w826A DEVELOPMENT ANO MAINTENANCE OF APPLICATIONS SOFTWARE 11 1 12 90 95 SUBTOTAL 11 1 12 TOTAL NAVOPXNTCEN SUITLAND, MARYLAND 11 1 12 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: NAVOROSTA lNOIAN HEAD, MARYLAND (E) NO SATISFACTORY COMMERCIAL SOURCE GO1l OTHER MORALE, WELFARE, AND RECREATION SERVICES o 1 1 83 94 SUBTOTAL 0 1 1 (x) COMMANDER 1S NOT SCHEDULING COST STUDY 221 DOD 41OO.33-INV MAY 1992 DOD INvENTORV OF COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL VEAR 1991 BV 000 COMPONENT, STATE, INSTALLATION, REASON CODE, AND FUNCTION UNITED STATES NAVY YR LAST YR NEXT !:::---------------------------------- F~~~?~ON ------------------------------- I WORK-YRS APPLIED A76 A76 CODE TITLE CIV MIL TOTAL REVIEW REVIEW TS03 ACCEPTANCE TESTING 169 0 169 89 94 SUBTOTAL 169 0 169 -. (Y) RETAINED IN-HOUSE 8ECAUSE THE COST STUDY EXCEEDED THE TIME LIMIT 2992 8U1LDINGS AND STRUCTURES (OTHER THAN FAMILY HOUSING) 123 0 123 91 SU8TOTAL 123 0 123 (Z) RETAINEO IN-HOUSE FOR REASONS NOT INCLUOEO ABOVE S718 FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION 40 0 40 88 S724A ‘INGRESS AND EGRESS CONTROL 12 12 88 S7248 PHYSICAL SECURITY PATROLS ANO POSTS’ : 3 88 S724C CONVENTIONAL ARMS, AMMUN1TION, ANO EXPLOSIVES (CAAE) SECURITY 1: 0 13 88 SU8TOTAL 68 0 68 TOTAL NAVORDSTA INDIAN HEAD, MARYLAND 360 1 361 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: NAVSCOLEOD INDIAN HEAO, MARVLAND (x) COMMANDER IS NOT SCHEOULING COST STUDY T820 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES o 6 6 89 94 U800 TRAINING DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT 0 6 6 88 93 SUBTOTAL 0 12 12 TOTAL NAVSCOLEOD INDIAN HEAD, MARYLAND 0 12 12 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: NAVSTA ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND (Z) RETAINED IN-HOUSE FOR REASONS NOT INCLUDED ABOVE S724 GUARO SERVICE 0 8 8 88 93 SU8TOTAL 0 6 6 TOTAL NAVSTA ANNAPOLIS, MARYLANO 0 a 6 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: NAVSWC OET SILVER SPRING, MARYLANO (F) Government CosTs LESS THAN COMMERCIAL SOURCE S716 MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATION 0 15 68 S717 MOTOR VEHICLE MAINTENANcE 0 88 T8200 INTERNAL MAIL AND MESSENGER SERVICES 0 ; B? SUBTOTAL 22 0 22 (Z) RETAINED IN-HOUSE FOR REASONS NOT INCLUOEO ABOVE S718 FIRE PREVENTION ANO PROTECTION 15 0 16 88 93 222 r,% DOD 41OO.33-INV MAY 1992 DOD INVENTORY OF COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991 6V DOO COMPONENT, STATE, INSTALLATION, REASON cOOE, AND FuNcTION UNITEO STATES NAVY YR LAST YR NEXT /------------------------------- ------ FUNCTION ----------------------------- --/ WORK-YRS APPLIED A76 A76 COD E TITLE CIV MIL TOTAL REVIEW. REvIEw S724 GUARD SERVICE 10 0 10 8s 93 SUBTOTAL 26 0 25 TOTAL NAVSWC DET SILVER SPRING, MARYLAND 47 0 47 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: NIAC WASHINGTON SUITLAND, MARYLAND (D) COMMERCIAL SOURCE WOULD CAUSE UNACCEPTABLE DELAY OR DISRUPTION W824A OPERATION OF ADP EQUIPMENT o 54 54 W824B PROOUCTION CONTROL AND CUSTOMER SERVICE 4 :: W824H OTHER AOP OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT ; 1; 90 W826A DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF APPLICATIONS SOFTWARE :: 0 35 90 W826B DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF SYSTEMS SOFTWARE 21 0 21 90 SU8TOTAL 72 59 131 TOTAL NIAC WASHINGTON SUITLAND, MARYLAND 72 69 131 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: NSHS 8ETHESDA, MARYLANO (X) COMMANDER IS NOT SCHEDULING COST STUDY T807 AUDIOVISUAL AND VISUAL INFORMATION SERVICES 21 0 21 89 84 SUBTOTAL 21 0 21 TOTAL NSHS 8ETHESDA, MARYLANO 21 0 21 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: NTIC WASHINGTON SUITLAND, MARYLANO (0) COMMERCIAL SOURCE WOULD CAUSE UNACCEPTABLE DELAY OR DISRUPTION TB07 AUDIOVISUAL AND VISUAL INFORMATION SERVICES 39 30 69 87 92 w826 SYSTEMS DESIGN,DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRAMMING SERVICES 10 0 10 90 95 SUBTOTAL 49 30 79 TOTAL NTIC WASHINGTON SUITLAND, MARYLAND 49 30 79 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: USNA ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND (D) COMMERCIAL SOURCE WOULD CAUSE UNACCEPTABLE DELAY OR DISRUPTION ELECTRICAL PLANTS AND SYSTEMS 8 o 8 93 HEATING PLANTS AND SYSTEMS 23 0 23 WATER PLANTS AND SYSTEMS s 0 8 :: SEWAGE AND WASTE PLANTS AND SYSTEMS 3 0 93 AIR CONDITIONING AND REFRIGERATION PLANTS 9 0 : 93 OTHER SERVICES OR UTILITIES 29 29 93 AUDIOVISUAL AND VISUAL INFORMATION SERVICES 6 : 5 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES 43 0 43 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 12 12 MAINTENANCE OF ADP EQUIPMENT w826 SYSTEMS DESIGN,DEVELOPMENT ANO PROGRAMMING S,ERVICES 3: 3: 223 DOD 41OO.33-INV MAY 1992 DOD INVENTORY OF COMMERCIAL AcTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991 BY DOD COMPONENT, STATE, INSTALLATION, REAsoN CODE, AND FuNcTIoN UNITED STATES NAVY YR LAST YR NEXT /--------------------- ---------------- F;;;[:ON ---------------------- ---------/ ; WORK-YRS APPLIEO A76 A76 cODE CIV MIL TOTAL REVIEW REVIEW z99i 8uILDINGS AND STRUCTURES--FAMILY HOUSING 18 18 88 93 Z992 8UILDINGS AND Structures (OTHER THAN FAMILy HOUSING) 171 ; 171 90 Z993 GROUNDS AND SURFACED AREAS 22 0 22 88 :: \“ SUBTOTAL 389 0 389 (E) NO SATISFACTORY COMMERCIAL SOURCE S713 FOOD SERVICES 127 0 127 86 94 SUBTOTAL 127 0 127 (F) GOVERNMENT COSTS LESS THAN cOMMERCIAL SOURCE S71O PEST MANAGEMENT 5 0 5 B7 94 Z993 GROUNDS AND SURFACEO AREAS 14 o 14 87 94 SUBTOTAL 19 0 19 (Y) RETAINEO IN-HOUSE ❑ ECAUSE THE COST sTUOV EXCEEDED THE TIME LIMIT S716 MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATION 37 0 37 91 96 SUBTOTAL 37 0 37 (Z) RETAINED IN-HOUSE FOR REASONS NOT INCLUDEO A80VE S708 LAUNDRY AND ORY CLEANING SERVICES 73 0 90 95 s7i8 FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION 45 0 :: 8B 93 572Z GUARD SERVICE 59 1 60 88 93 SUBTOTAL 177 1 17B TOTAL USNA ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND 749 1 750 TOTAL MARYLAND 1976 311 2287 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: NAs SOUTH WEYMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS (D) COMMERCIAL SOURCE WOULD CAUSE UNACCEPTABLE OELAY OR DISRUPTION S709 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 2 0 2 90 s726 HEATING PLANTS AND SYSTEMS 7 0 7 90 S729 AIR CONDITIONING AND REFRIGERATION PLANTS 3 0 3 90 Z991 BuILDINGS ANO STRUCTURES--FAMILY HOUSING 4 0 90 Z992 8uILDINGS AND sTRucTURES (OTHER THAN FAM I LY HOUSING) 25 0 2; 90 Z993 GROUNDS AND SURFACED AREAS 3 0 3 90 SUBTOTAL 44 0 44 (F) GOVERNMENT COSTS LESS THAN COMMERCIAL SOURCE S71O PEST MANAGEMENT 0 88 w824 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 0 i 88 224 ,,, ,, DOD 41OO.33-INV MAY 1992 DOD INVENTORV OF COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991 BV 00D COMPONENT, STATE, INSTALLATION) REAsoN CooE! AND FuNcTIoN UNITEO STATES NAVV VR LAST VR NEXT /-------------------- ----------------- Fy:~::oN ------ ----- ------- ------ ----- -- / WORK-VRS APPLIED A76 A76 CODE CIV MIL TOTAL REVI<W’” REVIEW SUBTOTAL 9 0 9 (Z) RETAINED IN-HOUSE FOR REASONS NOT INCLUOED ABOVE S718 FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION 41 0 41 88 93 S724 GUARD SERVICE o 25 25 88 93 SUBTOTAL 41 25 66 TOTAL NAS SOUTH WEVMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS 94 25 119 TOTAL MASSACHUSETTS 94 25 119 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: NAVRESREDCOM REG 16 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA (z) RETAINED IN-HOUSE FOR REASONS NOT INCLUOED ABOVE S709 CUSTODIAL SERVICES o 1 90 95 SUBTOTAL 0 1 TOTAL NAVRESREDCOM REG 16 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 0 1 TOTAL MINNESOTA o 1 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: CBC GULFPORT, MISSISSIPPI (F) GOVERNMENT COSTS LESS THAN COMMERCIAL sOURCE S710 PEST MANAGEMENT 2 0 2 82 94 s716 MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATION 15 0 15 83 94 S717 MOTOR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 3 0 3 83 94 T820D INTERNAL MAIL ANO MESSENGER SERVICES 2 0 2 89 94 W824 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 13 0 82 94 2992 8UILDINGS AND STRUCTURES (OTHER THAN FAMILY HOUSING) 47 0 1; 84 94 SUBTOTAL 82 0 62 (Z) RETAINED IN-HOUSE FOR REASONS NOT INCLUDED A80VE S718 FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION 18 88 93 S724 GUARD SERVICE 12 43 88 93 SUBTOTAL 47 14 61 TOTAL CBC GULFPORT, MISSISSIPPI 129 14 143 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: NAS MERIDIAN, MISSISSIPPI 225 DOO 4100.33-INV MAY 1992 DOD INVENTORV OF COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991 BY DOD COMPONENT, STATE, INSTALLATION, REASON COOE, ANO FUNCTION UNITED STATES NAVY YR LAST YR NEXT /------------------------------------- FuNCTION --------------------- ‘---------/ WORK-VRS APPLIED A76 A76 CODE TITLE CIV MIL TOTAL REVIEW REVIEW (v) RETAINED IN-HOUSE BECAUSE THE COST STUDV EXCEEDED THE TIME LIMIT PEST MANAGEMENT 91 - 96 MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATION 91 ‘ 96 MOTOR vEHICLE MAINTENANCE 91 96 WATER PLANTS AND SVSTEMS 91 98 SEWAGE AND WASTE PLANTS AND SYSTEMS 91 96 AUDIOVISUAL AND VISUAL INFORMATION SERVICES 3 91 96 BUILDINGS AND StrUCtUreS ( OTHER THAN F AMILY HOUSING) 3: 0 3: 91 96 GROUNDS AND SURFACED AREAS 5 0 5 91 96 SUBTOTAL 66 3 69 (Z) RETAINED IN-HOUSE FOR REASONS NOT INCLUDED ABOVE S71B FIRE PREVENTION
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NAVY EOD and DIVE COMMUNITY EXPANDS TACTICAL HUMAN PERFORMANCE PROGRAM Naval Education and Training Command (15 May 2020) PANAMA CITY, Fla
    I S S U E 4 J U L 2 0 2 0 THE PRIMER N A V Y E O D Q U A R T E R L Y VVIISSIIOONN NNaavvyy EEOODD 22003300 SSttrraatteeggiicc PPllaann GGUUIIDDAANNCCEE CCNNOO''ss MMeessssaaggee TToo TThhee FFlleeeett SSTTRRIIKKEE LLaauunncchh CCLLIIPPSS WWhhaatt''ss hhaappppeenniinngg iinn tthhee EEOODD ccoommmmuunniittyy aanndd aarroouunndd tthhee FFlleeeett?? Contents In this issue: 3 Message From The Commodores 4 Guidance 11 Community Recognition 15 Clips A MESSAGE FROM THE COMMODORES As the Navy adjusts to the "new normal" during the COVID-19 pandemic, the EOD force has maintained its flexibility and adaptability continually meeting mission requirements. We recently welcomed home EODMU-2 after completing a very successful, and extended, deployment to U.S. 5th Fleet, and look forward to EODMU-6's achievements as they continue the mission. As the Navy transitions through the COVID pandemic, continue to do your part to follow health protection conditions and CDC guidelines to prevent the spread of this disease. Looking into the future, the Navy EOD Strategic Plan 2030 will be released in August in conjunction with Navy EOD's 79th birthday. The plan lays out a 10-year strategic framework to address steps needed to generate the future force in an era of great power competition. As we enable the fight for sea control and freedom to maneuver Joint Forces, this plan will set conditions for the continued success of our organization. The successful launch of STRIKE, previously called EOD Force Resiliency Program (FRP), in July is a key element to enable further development of the force.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Program Acquisition Cost by Weapons System
    The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $36,000 for the 2019 Fiscal Year. This includes $11,000 in expenses and $25,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2019FEB14 RefID: B-1240A2B FY 2020 Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon System Major Weapon Systems Overview The performance of United States (U.S.) weapon systems are unmatched, ensuring that U.S. military forces have a tactical combat advantage over any adversary in any environmental situation. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 acquisition (Procurement and Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)) funding requested by the Department of Defense (DoD) totals $247.3 billion, which includes funding in the Base budget and the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) fund, totaling $143.1 billion for Procurement and $104.3 billion for RDT&E. The funding in the budget request represents a balanced portfolio approach to implement the military force objective established by the National Defense Strategy. Of the $247.3 billion in the request, $83.9 billion finances Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs), which are acquisition programs that exceed a cost threshold established by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. To simplify the display of the various weapon systems, this book is organized by the following mission area categories: • Aircraft and Related Systems • Missiles and Munitions • Command, Control, Communications, • Shipbuilding and Maritime Systems Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) • Space Based Systems Systems • Science and Technology • Ground Systems • Mission Support Activities • Missile Defeat and Defense Programs FY 2020 Investment Total: $247.3 Billion $ in Billions Numbers may not add due to rounding Introduction FY 2020 Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon System The Distribution of Funding in FY 2020 for Procurement and RDT&E by Component and Category* $ in Billions $ in Billions * Funding in Mission Support activities are not represented in the above displays.
    [Show full text]
  • MSC to Welcome New Class of Tugboats to Fleet
    IN THIS ISSUE NORFOLK CELEBRATES MILITARYCHILDREN OnMonday,April29th,Norfolk PublicSchoolsinpartnership withNavalStationNorfolk hostedtheirthirdannualcele- brationfortheMonthofthe MilitaryChild. SeeA4 VOL. 27,No. 18,Norfolk, VA | flagshipnews.com 5.9.2019–5.15.2019 NAVY OFFERS 10 TIPS TO EASE HOUSEHOLD GOODS MOVES From NAVSUPPublic Affairs phone number so you can always be reached. Find auser guide for this site at: MECHANICSBURG, PA. https://www.navsup.navy.mil/public/nav- sup/hhg/dps_guides/ About half of all Navy household goods •www.facebook.com/navyhhg (HHG) movesoccur between May 15 and Youcan also use FB Messenger August 15,with late June/early July being •www.youtube.com/navyhhg the busiest. To makethis year’smoving •www.pinterest.com/navyhhg season easier,the Navy is offering 10 tips 2. Start early and be flexible members can use to ensure asmooth move. The high volume of movesduring peak “Anyone in the Navy planning amove season drivesa4-6-week lead time for this summercan greatly reduce the chances scheduling moves. Schedule your move as for encountering frustration before or dur- soon as you get orders. Delay can cause ing an upcoming move by planning ahead.” difficulties in getting your shipment said NavalSupply Systems Command booked. Finally,beprepared to accept al- Navy HHG Manager John Hilaman. “Sail- ternate dates and discuss options with your ors and their families canuse these 10 tips local counseling office. as asimple checklist to making sure all 3. Use online training to help youpre- goes well.” pare 1. Bookmark keywebsites If you have nevermovedorit’sbeen a •https://www.navsup.navy.mil/house- while, you may want to attend one of the hold Navy HHG webinars.
    [Show full text]
  • B-293871,B-293871.2 Specialty Marine, Inc
    Comptroller General of the United States United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 Decision Matter of: Specialty Marine, Inc. File: B-293871; B-293871.2 Date: June 17, 2004 Robert E. Korroch, Esq., Williams Mullen, for the protester. David D. Bach, Esq., Department of the Navy, Naval Sea Systems Command, for the agency. Edward Goldstein, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Protest that agency improperly obtained services outside scope of multiple-award indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contracts is denied where services were reasonably encompassed by the contracts at issue. DECISION Specialty Marine, Inc. protests the decision of the Department of the Navy, Supervisor of Shipbuilding, Conversion and Repair, USN, Portsmouth, VA (SUPSHIP) to obtain maintenance and repair services for the USNS MOHAWK (T-ATF 170) and the USNS APACHE (T-ATF 172) 1 under certain multiple-award, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (ID/IQ) task order contracts. Specialty Marine principally maintains that these services are outside the scope of the ID/IQ contracts, and that by acquiring them under the contracts, the agency has engaged in improper bundling. We deny the protest. 1 The Navy explains that the designation “ATF” is an acronym for “Fleet Ocean Tug” and the prefix “T” signifies that the ship is assigned to the Commander, Military Sealift Command (MSC). Contracting Officer (CO) Statement at 1 n.2. In 2000, SUPSHIP issued a solicitation contemplating the award of multiple ID/IQ contracts for “ship repair and shipalt installation.”2 Request for Proposals (RFP) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Danish and French Companies in Talks to Buy APL Parent NOL Eptune Orient Lines the NOL Announcement A.P
    Organized 1885 Official Organ of the Sailors’ Union of the Pacific Volume LXXVIII No. 11 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Friday, November 20, 2015 Danish and French companies in talks to buy APL parent NOL eptune Orient Lines The NOL announcement A.P. Moller-Maersk, which op- they are looking to expand into Lars Jensen CEO of Copen- (NOL), the parent com- comes in the wake of months of erates 617 vessels, is the number new territory. hagen-based Sea Intelligence pany of American Presi- speculation regarding the future one container carrier globally According to the Journal, Consulting said, “CMA CGM N while CMA CGM is the third CMA CGM faces pressure to needs to boost its scale more dent Lines, confirmed this month of the company (see the July than Maersk.” Jensen added that that it is in preliminary and sepa- West Coast Sailors). largest, operating 471. expand as two state-owned Maersk is bigger on TransPa- As the West Coast Sailors Chinese shipping giants, China rate negotiations with Denmark’s NOL, which operates 91 ves- cific routes, and it would make went to press, the Wall Street Ocean Shipping Company and A.P. Moller-Maersk and France’s sels globally under the APL less sense to buy NOL at a time Journal reported that CMA CMA CGM (Compagnie Mari- brand, has been unprofitable China Shipping Group, are in when it is cutting its workforce CGM is emerging as an early fa- time d’Affretement-Compagnie since 2009. The company sold advanced talks to merge. That by 4,000 and ratcheting back vorite to buy NOL, according to Generale Maritime) for the pos- its profitable logistics business, combination would create the expansion plans elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Tacoma-Area Seafarers Step up with Holiday Donations for Military
    FEBRUARYFEBRUARY 2016 2014 VOLUME VOLUME 76 o 78 NO. NO. 2 2 Union Welcomes New Tonnage Jones Act Tankers Texas, Independence Signify Additional Jobs for Seafarers The recent delivery of the Crowley tanker Texas (below) on the East Coast and the launch of Seabulk Tankers’ Independence (left) on the West Coast mean new SIU jobs and underscore U.S. shipbuilding capability. Pictured in the group photo below, taken at the Independence ceremony, are (from left) AMO National Asst. VP Daniel Shea, Chief Engineer Jason Kast, SIU VP West Coast Nick Marrone, Seabulk Tankers President/Chief Operating Officer Daniel Thorogood, General Dynamics NASSCO President Fred Harris, Seabulk Tankers VP Fleet Management Robert “Bud” Hall, AMO National VP Inland Waters David Weathers, SIU VP Contracts George Tricker, and Capt. Mark Maxim. Page 3. Tacoma-Area Seafarers Step Up With Holiday Donations for Military Families The SIU’s annual participation in Santa’s Castle, a program benefitting military families, has never been stronger. During the most recent holiday season, Seafarers donated more than $10,000 in new toys, while SIU-contracted companies also joined in with donations that boosted the total value to around $12,000. In photo at right on behalf of the company, Crowley Maritime’s Lee Egland (left) delivered the two bikes in the foreground. He is pictured with Port Agent Joe Vincenzo, who leads the SIU’s involvement in Santa’s Castle. The photo below shows many of the toys staged at the hall prior to their delivery to nearby Joint Base Lewis-McChord. Page 24. SIU Endorses Hillary Clinton NTSB Releases El Faro Images Annual Tax Tips Page 2 Page 6 Pages 12-14 31912_LOG.indd 1 1/29/2016 5:16:06 AM President’s Report Overlooked Benefits of Jones Act If you spend any time in the U.S.-flag maritime industry, it usually doesn’t take long before the subject of the Jones Act comes up.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Expert Panel Report Sea Level Rise and the U.S
    MILITARY EXPERT PANEL REPORT SEA LEVEL RISE AND THE U.S. MILITARY’S MISSION September 2016 Military Expert Panel Members General Ronald Keys, United States Air Force (ret) Lieutenant General John Castellaw, United States Marine Corps (ret) Vice Admiral Robert Parker, United States Coast Guard (ret) Rear Admiral Jonathan White, United States Navy (ret) Brigadier General Gerald Galloway, United States Army (ret) Military Expert Panel Chair Christine Parthemore Edited by Shiloh Fetzek Caitlin E. Werrell Francesco Femia Military Expert Panel Report Sea LeveL RiSe and the U.S. MiLitaRy’S MiSSion September 2016 Cover Photo: The lone ship at the pier at the Naval Station, Norfolk, Va., USS Kearsarge (LHD 3) endures the rain and heavy winds from Hurricane Isabel as the storm moved across the Tidewater area. The storm flooded portions of Fleet Parking at the Naval Station, trapping some vehicles in water up to their windows. Hurricane Isabel cost the Navy nearly $130 million in damage in the Mid-Atlantic region of the U.S.. September 2003. US NAVY / PHOTOGRAPHER’S MATE 1ST CLASS MICHAEL PENDERGRASS. ContentS I Note from the Military Expert Panel 4 II Executive Summary 5 III Findings and List of Recommendations 6 IV Introduction: Military Infrastructure in a Changing Security Landscape 7 Figure 1: Coastal Installation Assets V Review of the Risk Landscape 10 Highlight: Nuisance Flooding: Far More Than Just a “Nuisance” VI Combined Risk Outlook Based on Recent Studies 16 VII Discussion: Sea Level Rise and Military Readiness, Operations, and Strategy 17 Table 1: Climate Change, Readiness, Operations and Strategy Readiness and Operations 19 Figure 2: Contrasting Installation Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Strategy 22 Highlight: Strategic Implications - The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Sealift Command
    The U.S. Navy’s MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAND 2015IN REVIEW FAST FACTS 46 3,421 Available 170 Ready Reserve MSC SHIPS Replenishments Force Ships Patients treated by USNS Mercy and 140,276 USNS Comfort personnel during Continuing Promise 2015 and Pacific Partnership 2015 480 New Mariners Needed in FY16 MSC Area5 Commands: Norfolk, Virginia San Diego 25 Prepositioning ships supporting Naples, Italy Manama, Bahrain Navy, Marine Corps, Army and Air Force Singapore 90,910 5,833 Civilian Mariners at MSC 8.3M Dry Cargo and Ordnance Barrels of Petroleum Pallets Moved by Moved by Combat Total MSC Personnel Logistics Force 9,561 Combat Logistics Force 2015 IN REVIEW TABLE OF CONTENTS Commander’s Perspective ............................................... 2 Organization Organization Chart...................................................................5 Mission Areas Combat Logistics Force ...........................................................8 Service and Command Support .............................................12 Special Mission .....................................................................16 Prepositioning ........................................................................20 Sealift ...................................................................................24 Ships of the U.S. Navy’s Military Sealift Command ....... 28 Area Commands MSC Atlantic — Norfolk, Virginia ............................................30 MSC Pacific — San Diego .....................................................34 MSC Europe and Africa — Naples,
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT to CONGRESS BIENNIAL ASSESSMENT of the SHIP DISPOSAL PROGRAM January 2018
    U. S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration REPORT TO CONGRESS BIENNIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SHIP DISPOSAL PROGRAM January 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 1 I. GOVERNMENT OWNED VESSELS 4 Government Owned Vessels by Agency………………………………………….….. 4 II. PLANNED VESSEL OBSOLESCENCE AND SERVICE RETIREMENT 8 Agency Planned Vessel Retirement Schedules ……………………………………… 8 III. DISPOSAL OF GOVERNMENT OWNED VESSELS IN THE US ……………. 10 Legislative Limitation ………………………………………………………………... 10 MARAD Federal Ship Outreach Program. ………………………………………..…. 10 Domestic Scrap Steel Prices …………………………………………………………. 10 Scrap Steel Market Outlook ………………………………………………………….. 13 Domestic Ship Recycling Industry…………………………………………………… 13 Domestic Ship Recycling Capacity ………..……………………………………...…. 15 MARAD Ship Disposal Program ……………………….…………………….……... 16 Historic Low Number of MARAD Ships Awaiting Disposal ………………………. 17 Simplified Acquisition for Vessel Recycling ………………………………………... 17 MARAD Ship Disposal Solicitation Process ………………………………………… 18 Submittal of General Technical Proposal – Step One ……………………………….. 18 General Technical Proposal Evaluation Criteria …………………………………….. 19 Submittal of Sales Offers or Price Revisions – Step Two …………………………… 20 Evaluation and Award of Sales and Price Quotations ……………………………….. 21 Basis for Best-Value Award …………………………………………………………. 21 MARAD Vessel Awards by Fiscal Year …………………………………………….. 22 MARAD Ship Disposal Funding …………………………………………………….. 22 Navy Ship Disposal Program ………………………………………………………… 25 Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICE of SHIP DISPOSAL PROGRAMS U. S. Department Of
    OFFICE OF SHIP DISPOSAL PROGRAMS ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 December 2016 U. S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration OBSOLETE SHIPS RESERVE FLEET MARITIME ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF SHIP DISPOSAL PROGRAMS TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ..…………………………………………………………...... 2 I. Ship Disposal Programs ….………………………………………………….. 5 Domestic Scrap Steel Prices …………………………………………………. 5 Domestic Recycling Industry ………………………………………………… 7 Federal Ship Outreach ……………………………………………………….. 8 Planned Vessel Retirement Schedules ………………………………………. 11 European Ship Recycling Regulation ………………………………………... 13 Environmental Stewardship ………………………………………………….. 14 Ship Disposal Alternatives …………………………………………………… 15 Best Value Ship Disposal Source Selection …………………………………. 16 Ship Disposal Funding ……………………………………………………….. 17 Sales Revenues ………………………………………………………………. 18 Fiscal Year 2017 Disposal Activities ………………………………………… 19 Five Year Disposal Program Projections …………………………………….. 19 Ship Disposal Performance Measures ……………………………………….. 21 Environmental Regulation and Related Legal Challenges ………………….. 23 II. N.S. Savannah ……………………………………………………………….... 24 Licensed Activities …………………………………………………………... 24 Stewardship ………………………………………………………………….. 25 Protective Storage ……………………………………………………………. 26 FY 2016 Significant Activities ………………………………………………. 26 III. Conclusions …………………………………………………………………… 28 IV. Appendix United States Army Corp of Engineers – List of Vessels ……………………. 29 United States Department of the Army – List of Vessels ……………………. 30 United States Maritime
    [Show full text]
  • Honorable Senator David Vitter
    OFFICE OF SHIP DISPOSAL PROGRAMS ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017 January 2018 U. S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration OBSOLETE SHIPS RESERVE FLEET MARITIME ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF SHIP DISPOSAL PROGRAMS TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ..…………………………………………………………...... 2 I. Ship Disposal Programs ….………………………………………………….. 5 Domestic Scrap Steel Prices …………………………………………………. 5 Domestic Recycling Industry ………………………………………………… 8 Federal Ship Outreach ……………………………………………………….. 9 Planned Vessel Retirement Schedules ………………………………………. 13 European Ship Recycling Regulation ………………………………………... 15 Environmental Stewardship ………………………………………………….. 15 Ship Disposal Alternatives …………………………………………………… 16 Best Value Ship Disposal Source Selection …………………………………. 17 Ship Disposal Funding ……………………………………………………….. 18 Vessel Sales Revenues ……………………………………………………….. 20 National Maritime Heritage Act ……………………………………………... 21 FY 2016 End of Year VORF Account Balance………………………………. 21 Ship Disposal Sales Revenue Retained ……………………………………… 22 VORF Obligations and Funds Provided ……………………………………... 22 VORF FY 2017 Sub-Account Activity ……………………………………… 23 VORF A: NDRF Projects ……………………………………………………. 23 VORF B: USMMA and SMA’s ……………………………………………… 24 VORF C: Maritime Heritage ………………………………………………… 24 VORF C1: National Park Service NMHGP………………………………….. 24 VORF C2: MARAD Maritime Heritage …………………………………….. 25 MARAD Maritime Heritage Projects ……………………………………….. 25 Fiscal Year 2018 Planned Disposal Activities…..…………………………… 27 Five Year Disposal Program Projections …………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • February 2020 Whole No
    Dedicated to the Study of Naval and Maritime Covers Vol. 87 No. 2 February 2020 Whole No. 1035 February 2020 Fom the Editor’s Desk 2 Feature Cover Send for Your Own Covers 2 Out of the Past 3 Calendar of Events 3 USS S-44 (SS 155) Navy News 4 President’s Message 5 The Goat Locker 6 Letters to the Editor 7 For Beginning Members 8 West Coast Navy News 9 More Letters to the Edito r 9 Norfolk Navy News 10 Membership Dues 11 CDR Cammer, Censor 12 More Letters to the Editor 13 USNS FPO Numbers 14 Two Letters from (BB 6) 15 USS S-44 (SS 155) 16 Unravelling History… 18 Navy Reinstates 2nd Fleet 21 USS FRANCIS MARION 22 February’s feature cover is courtesy of the Naval Cover Museum. It is used as one of the illustrations for John USS ARKANSAS (BB 33) 24 Pollock’s (12,096) article about submarine USS S-44 (SS 155) which begins on page 16. Send for Covers-Results 25 The cover marks the 40th Anniversary of the loss of S-44 in October 1943. The cachet was designed by Budd Arrington, USPOD Metal Duplex sponsored by Decatur Chapter # 4 USCS Handstamp History Part 1 26 Auctions 28 Covers for Sale 30 Flotsam and Jetsam 30 Classified Ads 31 Secretary’s Report 32 Page 2 Universal Ship Cancellation Society Log February 2020 The Universal Ship Cancellation Society, Inc., (APS From the Editor's Desk Affiliate #98), a non-profit, tax exempt corporation, founded in 1932, promotes the study of the history of ships, their postal One of the features of this page each month markings and postal documentation of events involving the U.S.
    [Show full text]