Hybrid Aircraft Carriers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hybrid Aircraft Carriers HYBRID AIRCRAFT CARRIERS More Fanciful Than Practical… …But a Concept That Still Intrigues ~ BACKGROUND ~ In the early 19 th and 20 th centuries, battleships, which were often referred to as capital or ‘big gun’ ships, were a symbol of naval dominance and a source of national pride. For several decades they played an important role in the projection of sea power. No self-respecting world power’s navy was considered complete without having at least one battleship. Then along came naval aviation and eventually the cataclysmic events in naval history that transpired in 1941/942. Such as the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, the sinking of two British capital ships a few days afterwards and the Battle of Midway; amongst other events in which air power reigned supreme. At first relegated to a support role…scouting for battle fleets…eventually the aircraft carrier replaced the battleship as the symbolic capital ship in numerous navies. But during a lengthy and often contested transition period, ‘battleship admirals’ resisted that shift and only grudgingly agreed to experiment with a curious combination of ship types that were dubbed hybrids. Several nations participated in what ultimately proved to be an ill-advised and largely unworkable way to wage war by incorporating aircraft carrying capabilities into the designs of traditional ‘big gun’ ships…and also submersibles. ~ EARLY EXPERIMENTS ~ In the early 20 th century, several world powers demonstrated that aircraft could take off and land at sea, using improvised platforms temporarily mounted on existing warships. One of the first, if not the first, was the United States Navy. The birth of naval aviation in America took place on November 14, 1910, when a civilian aviator flew his flimsy airframe from an anchored cruiser’s improvised flight deck. This noteworthy event was followed two months later when that same daring pilot landed on another anchored US Navy warship, temporarily modified for the purpose of demonstrating the feasibility of shipboard aircraft operations. Aircraft operations conducted from ships while underway commenced in 1912, when an aircraft flew off a temporary platform mounted on the bow of a British cruiser. The world’s first air raid conducted by naval forces was made in 1914 by four amphibian aircraft supported by a Japanese seaplane tender. Interestingly, Japan was a member of the allies in World War I, and that historic attack was made against an Austro-Hungarian cruiser and a German gunboat. However, neither vessel was hit. The first ‘true’ aircraft carrier was HMS ARGUS; commissioned in 1918. Originally slated to be an Italian ocean liner, World War I prevented her being completed in that configuration by her British shipbuilders. Instead, she became a Royal Navy flush-deck carrier. ARGUS was often derisively called a ‘covered wagon’ before she proved her worth in World War II. But such ships, capable of launching and recovering aircraft at sea were at first only considered as support ships for fleets of ‘big gun’ warships. Then, someone in the Royal Navy came up with the idea of combining the capabilities of ‘battlewagons’ with ‘covered wagons’. 2 ~ HMS FURIOUS…FIRST OF THE HYBRIDS ~ HMS FURIOUS and two ‘half-sister’ ships, as designed, were intended to be lightly protected, high speed battlecruisers. With a length of 786.75 feet and a beam of 88 feet, they were expected to displace a calculated 22,890 tons at full load. They were the first large British warships to have geared turbines, and were expected to attain a maximum speed of 31.5 knots. HMS GLORIOUS and COURAGEOUS (below), as completed, were fitted with a main armament of four, 15-inch naval rifles. FURIOUS, however, initially had installed two massive 18.1-inch guns mounted in two single turrets; one forward and one aft; hence the three ships’ designation as ‘half-sisters’. Shortly after completion, FURIOUS returned to her builder’s yard, when her forward gun turret was removed and replaced with an aircraft hanger and a 228 foot long flight deck that was 50 feet wide. The hangar was capable of storing ten aircraft. A crane was utilized to lift aircraft from the hangar to the flight deck. The ship was assigned several floatplanes, which utilized a wheeled trolly that ran on a track down the centerline of the vessel’s flight deck for take-off. Commissioned in June of 1917, FURIOUS…first of the hybrid aircraft carriers…initially used the crane to recover aircraft after they landed alongside her. But that practice proved to be unworkable in rough seas. On August 2, 1917, a never-before attempted maneuver was tried. The idea was to land on the vessel’s flight deck by flying alongside the ship and side-slipping around the ship’s superstructure and onto the flight deck. A Sopwith Camel fitted with conventional landing gear and being flown by Squadron Commander E. H. Dunning approached the ship, moving slowly forward along its starboard side. FURIOUS was steaming at 26 knots with a 21-knot headwind over its flight deck. 3 As a result, Commander Dunning’s aircraft could essentially hover alongside FURIOUS. When he adroitly maneuvered sideways and over the flight deck, members of the ship’s crew, served as an impromptu human arresting gear system; risking life and limb to grab the aircraft’s structure and help settle it into what was the world’s first ever landing on a moving ship. Tragically, five days later, when attempting to repeat his feat, the engine on Commander Dunning’s airplane stalled. He crashed into the sea and drowned. Soon thereafter the FURIOUS received another major modification. Near the end of 1917, her aft gun turret was removed and replaced by a 300 foot long landing deck; surmounted by a second hangar. Two aircraft elevators, called ‘lifts’ by the British, were installed, one for each hanger. Her superstructure and funnel were left intact, but were flanked on either side by narrow aircraft taxi strips that connected the landing deck, aft and the take-off deck, forward. 4 However, turbulance generated by the ship’s superstructure and single centerline funnel while underway at high speed made landing on FURIOUS’ aft flight deck hazardous. Another disarming factor was the relative shortness of the landing area. A contraption that consisted of suspended vertical wires had to be installed to prevent any aircraft missing the ship’s primative arresting gear from crashing into the large funnel. Nevertheless, Britian’s hybrid aircraft carrier and her embarked squadrons made history on July 19, 1918, when they made the world’s first carrier-based air strike. Their mission, to bomb a German Zeppelin base was a success; albeit only resulting in minor damage to the German installation. A few months later, at the end of World War I, FURIOUS was laid up. Economic considerations precluded the construction of a full-fledged carrier. Rather than scrapping her, the Royal Navy modifed not only her, but also converted her two half-sisters from their original configurations as battle cruisers to become true aircraft carriers, as depicted below. FURIOUS survived World War II, only to be scrapped in 1948. COURAGEOUS and GLORIOUS were both sunk during the early years of the war; in 1939 and 1940, respectively. ~ FLYING-DECK CRUISERS ~ The Washington Naval Treaty, which was a multi-nation agreement created after World War I to limit the size of the world’s navies, had a great deal to do with the US Navy toying with the concept of ‘Flying-Deck Cruiser’. So did the reluctance of America’s battleship admirals to accept aircraft carriers that could not defend themselves if engaged in combat with powerful enemy surface ships. Thus was conceived the idea of a hybrid vessel of approximately 10,000 tons displacement (to meet treaty limitations) that had the attributes of a cruiser and a carrier. Such a vessel would have been about 650 feet long. The forward half of the vessel was to be fitted with one or more large caliper gun turrets. The after half was to have a 350 foot long flight deck atop a hangar capable of handling twenty-four aircraft, plus a starboard side island that included uptakes from the ship’s boilers; see the c.1930s design drawing, top of the next page. 5 No flying-deck cruisers were ever built by the United States. Instead, two battle cruisers under construction were modified extensively to create the large carriers LEXINGTON (CV-2) and SARATOGA (CV-3). Although they were ‘pure’ aircraft carriers, the Navy brass was not convinced that their aircraft, alone could adequately protect them from a surface attack. So, initially they were fitted with four large gun turrets, resulting in a so-called ‘half-hybrid’ design. These turrets were each fitted with two, eight-inch naval rifles and placed along the starboard side of the ships’ flight decks; two forward and two aft of massive island structures. The eight-inch guns were intended to provide as a means of repelling surface ship attacks. They could not be sufficiently elevated to ward off dive bombers, plus their large caliber design would have made them ineffective against such targets. In addition, the positioning of the original gun turrets made firing to the port side difficult, especially when aiming at surface targets at close range. Plus, the muzzle blast from any such attempt would have easily damaged embarked aircraft and the flight decks’ wooden sheathing. During World War II, both carriers had these large-bore gun turrets replaced by dual-purpose, five inch weapons more suitable for antiaircraft purposes. 6 ~ STILL-BORN BATTLESHIP/CARRIER HYBRIDS ~ At least two other nations considered the idea of building or modifying battleships that incorporated aircraft carrier capabilities.
Recommended publications
  • New Interpretations in Naval History Craig C
    U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons Historical Monographs Special Collections 1-1-2012 HM 20: New Interpretations in Naval History Craig C. Felker Marcus O. Jones Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/historical-monographs Recommended Citation Felker, Craig C. and Jones, Marcus O., "HM 20: New Interpretations in Naval History" (2012). Historical Monographs. 20. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/historical-monographs/20 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Historical Monographs by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NAVAL WAR COLLEGE PRESS New Interpretations in Naval History Selected Papers from the Sixteenth Naval History Symposium Held at the United States Naval Academy 10–11 September 2009 New Interpretations in Naval History Interpretations inNaval New Edited by Craig C. Felker and Marcus O. Jones O. andMarcus Felker C. Craig by Edited Edited by Craig C. Felker and Marcus O. Jones NNWC_HM20_A-WTypeRPic.inddWC_HM20_A-WTypeRPic.indd 1 22/15/2012/15/2012 33:23:40:23:40 PPMM COVER The Four Days’ Battle of 1666, by Richard Endsor. Reproduced by courtesy of Mr. Endsor and of Frank L. Fox, author of A Distant Storm: The Four Days’ Battle of 1666 (Rotherfi eld, U.K.: Press of Sail, 1996). The inset (and title-page background image) is a detail of a group photo of the midshipmen of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Pangbournian Record Volume 2
    The Old Pangbournian Record Volume 2 Casualties in War 1917-2020 Collected and written by Robin Knight (56-61) The Old Pangbournian Society The Old angbournianP Record Volume 2 Casualties in War 1917-2020 Collected and written by Robin Knight (56-61) The Old Pangbournian Society First published in the UK 2020 The Old Pangbournian Society Copyright © 2020 The moral right of the Old Pangbournian Society to be identified as the compiler of this work is asserted in accordance with Section 77 of the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, “Beloved by many. stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any Death hides but it does not divide.” * means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior consent of the Old Pangbournian Society in writing. All photographs are from personal collections or publicly-available free sources. Back Cover: © Julie Halford – Keeper of Roll of Honour Fleet Air Arm, RNAS Yeovilton ISBN 978-095-6877-031 Papers used in this book are natural, renewable and recyclable products sourced from well-managed forests. Typeset in Adobe Garamond Pro, designed and produced *from a headstone dedication to R.E.F. Howard (30-33) by NP Design & Print Ltd, Wallingford, U.K. Foreword In a global and total war such as 1939-45, one in Both were extremely impressive leaders, soldiers which our national survival was at stake, sacrifice and human beings. became commonplace, almost routine. Today, notwithstanding Covid-19, the scale of losses For anyone associated with Pangbourne, this endured in the World Wars of the 20th century is continued appetite and affinity for service is no almost incomprehensible.
    [Show full text]
  • British Aircraft Carriers 1939-45 PDF Book
    BRITISH AIRCRAFT CARRIERS 1939-45 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Angus Konstam,Tony Bryan | 48 pages | 20 Jul 2010 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781849080798 | English | Oxford, England, United Kingdom British Aircraft Carriers 1939-45 PDF Book Royal Navy. The latter were still partly active during the Falklands war. The French campaign had begun, and British troops were being repatriated to France. A second attack located the Bismarck, and despite a fierce and deadly AA fire, one of the last aircraft placed a hit on the rudder. Their watertight subdivision for example was improved and allowing to continue to float with several submerged compartments. Wikimedia Commons. Liners have always had the preference for basic conversion to aircraft carriers: They are faster and more spacious. Be the first to review this product. Audacious Class Fleet Aircraft Carriers : HMS Eagle ii in the Mediterranean in January Although these carriers falls into the cold war category, they were studied from and laid down in , therefore during the war, registered in the development of British wartime fleet aircraft carriers. EAGLE , 22, tons, 24 knots, 20 aircraft, crew plus aircrew, , lost:. Tanks in the Battle of the Bulge Steven J. As a stopgap later the Grumman Martlet Wildcats would enter service in Propulsion: 1 propeller, 2 steam turbine, 2 TE boilers, hp. Ripon flying off the deck of an unidentified carrier in Their tanks loaded , liters of aviation fuel. Then was the war broke out. The Admiralty, therefore, proposed in to convert it into an aircraft carrier, as it had been done for other ships, also as a test to compare the best platforms for this new type of ship.
    [Show full text]
  • King's Research Portal
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1177/0968344517702417 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Benbow, T. (2019). The contribution of Royal Navy aircraft carriers and the Fleet Air Arm to Operation ‘Overlord’, 1944. War in History, 26(2), 265-286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0968344517702417 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 19 Issue 1 E on TARGET?
    February 2012 Issue $3.95 Cdn / $4.50 US Display until March 2, 2012 Publications Mail # 40069149 Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to Circulation Dept. 204-1066 Somerset St. W. Ottawa ON K1Y 4T3 february 2012 esprit de corps 1 HALIFAX SHIPYARDS NEW AD 2 volume 19 issue 1 e ON TARGET? Volume 19 Issue 1 Heaping medals on a Publisher Manager commander will not turn the Scott Taylor Julie Simoneau Scott Taylor publisher Libya mission into a success story Assoc. Publisher Circulation Avi Gavai Natasha Overduin Columnist Atlantic Rep I noted with interest that in the latest and air force flypast, a grateful Parliament Michael Nickerson Gord Crowe crop of Order of Canada recipients was acknowledged that Bouchard had been Contributing Editors none other than Lieutenant-General fast-tracked to receive the Meritorious Les Peate, Norman Shannon Charles Bouchard. All those who have Service Cross from the Governor General Reporters Jessica Campbell, Marlee Wasser hadI the honour to serve with Bouchard of Canada for his role in bringing down Special Events acknowledge that he was a capable the Libyan tyrant. Now, just one month Thérèse Darêche, Lale Eskicioglu helicopter pilot and competent com- later, he was named to the Order of Michèle Simoneau mander. Nonetheless, the sheer rapidity Canada for the same feat. Contributors in this issue of his nomination and selection gives his To provide just a little context, it must Col. Michel Drapeau, Joshua Juneau, Eric Leclerc, honour the whiff of a propaganda ploy. be noted that included in the same list Rick Leswick, Josh Libben, John P.
    [Show full text]
  • Thresholds302005mass.Pdf
    0! ro < Ol LIBRARIES thresholds 30 :7uxa«mcv ^^^C jcember 14, ' 2005 microcosms ROTCH Patrons James Ackerman Imran Ahmed Mark and Elaine Beck Tom Beischer Robert F. Drum Gail Fenske Liminal Projects Inc. R.T. Freebaim-Smith Editor Nancy Stieber Mechtild Widrich Robert Alexander Gonzales Assistant Editor Jor§e Otero-Pailos Talia Dorsey Annie Pedret Managing Editor Vikram Prakash Tim Campos Joseph M. Siry Richard Skendzel Advisory Board Mark Jarzombek, Ctiair Stanford Anderson Dennis Adams Martin Bressani Jean-Louis Cohen Charles Correa Arindam Dutta Diane Ghirardo Ellen Dunham-Jones Robert Haywood Hasan-Uddin Khan Rodolphe el-Khoury Leo Marx Mary McLeod Ikem Okoye Vikram Prakash Kazys Varnelis Cherie Wendelken Gwendolyn Wright Cover image: phot05.com J. Meejin Yoon thresholds 30 microcosms Editorial Policy Thresholds is published biannually in spring and fall by the Department of Architecture at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology' Opinions in Thresholds are those of the authors alone, and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors of the Department of Architecture IMo part of Thresholds may be photocopied or distributed without written authorization. Thresholds is funded primarily by the Department of Architecture at MIT. Alumni support also helps defray publication costs Individuals donating 5 100 or more will be recognized in the journal as Patrons. Correspondence Thresholds Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Architecture Room 7-337 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge. MA 02139 thresh@mit edu Printing Copyright Summer 2005 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 155N:1091-7nX Design byschultzundschultz.com Printed by Kirkwood Printing, Wilmington, MA. Text set in Klavika; digitally published using Adobe InDesign.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Warfare in a Mature Precision-Strike Regime
    MARITIME WARFARE IN A MATURE PRECISION-STRIKE REGIME ANDREW F. KREPINEVICH 2014 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) is an independent, non- partisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s analysis focuses on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security, and its goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. © 2014 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Andrew Krepinevich is President of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. He assumed this position in 1993, following a 21-year career in the U.S. Army. Dr. Krepinevich has served in the Department of Defense’s Office of Net Assessment, and on the personal staff of three secretaries of defense. He has also served as a member of the National Defense Panel, the Defense Science Board Task Force on Joint Experimentation, the Joint Forces Command Advisory Board, and the Defense Policy Board. He currently serves on the Chief of Naval Operations' (CNO's) Advisory Board and on the Army Special Operations Command's Advisory Board. Dr. Krepinevich frequently contributes to print and broadcast media. He has lectured before a wide range of professional and academic audiences, and has served as a consultant on mil- itary affairs for many senior government officials, including several secretaries of defense, the CIA’s National Intelligence Council, and all four military services.
    [Show full text]
  • WRCNS / Unit Officer HMCS Stadacona - Awarded As Per Canada Gazette of 5 January 1946 and London Gazette of 1 January 1946
    ' Mac ' MacDONALD, Helen Marian, Acting Commander - Member - Order of the British Empire (MBE) - WRCNS / Unit Officer HMCS Stadacona - Awarded as per Canada Gazette of 5 January 1946 and London Gazette of 1 January 1946. Home: Vancouver, British Columbia. MacDONALD. Helen Marain, 0-43800, LCdr(Temp) [1.7.44] WRCNS MBE~[5.1.46] A/Cdr(Temp) [?] "One of the first Officers of the Women's Royal Canadian Naval Service to be commissioned, Commander MacDonald has held responsible positions as Executive Officer, HMCS Conestoga and latterly at unit Officer, HMCS Stadacona. During the period of the inception and rapid expansion of the Women's Royal Canadian Naval Service, this Officer showed sound organizing ability together with tact and understanding, thereby making a notable contribution to the efficiency and morale of the Service as a whole." * * * * * * MacDONALD, James Herbert, Stoker First Class (22152) - Medal of Freedom (USA) - RCN - Awarded effective 1 January 1946 (no Canada/London Gazette). Home: Watford Herts, England. MacDONALD. James Herbert, 22152, Stk 1/cl, RCN Medal Of Freedon(USA)~[5.10.46] "Mr. James H. MacDonald, Canadian civilian, risked grave danger on 31 August, 1943, to go to the rescue of four men whose airplane had crashed on the Mackenzie River near Fort Norman, North West Territories. In forbidding weather, he and two others navigated a small boat through heavy waves and removed the stricken airmen from their partially submerged aircraft." * * * * * * MACINTYRE, Roderick James, Leading Seaman (3137) - Distinguished Service Medal (DSM) - RCN - Awarded as per Canada Gazette of 20 January 1945 and London Gazette of 24 October 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Maritime & the Royal Navy
    STEM ACTIVITY BOOK Introduction to Maritime & The Royal Navy Why boats & ships have been important to the UK throughout history. For thousands of years, we have built boats and Without maritime, our world would be very ships to travel and explore places far beyond different. The food on our table would be very the British seas. Sea travel, or ‘maritime’ travel, different if it weren’t for explorers as potatoes, enabled famous British explorers like Captain peppers, and bananas all come from afar. James Cook to reach countries like Australia and Fashion today would also look very different. The New Zealand. colour purple originated in Lebanon; a small trip across the Mediterranean Sea, would not have been possible without the mighty ships. But even today, a lot of the goods we use every day, from our phones to our cars, are brought to the UK by ship. But boats and ships have not always been as grand as they are today. Maritime travel can be traced back to the Neolithic Stone Age, almost 8,000 years ago! The first boat was believed to be a hollowed-out tree trunk, which functions in the same way as the modern canoe. Copyright © 2020, Raytheon UK. All rights reserved. 3 STEM ACTIVITY BOOK Then came the invention of oars and sails, which powered faster sea travel enabling international trade of food and materials and better defence of our country’s borders. By the 17th century, ships had transformed from their once simple designs into engineering masterpieces. It was in the 17th century that the Royal Navy was formed, after the restoration of the monarchy under Charles II in 1660.
    [Show full text]
  • Nmrn Fleet Air Arm Museum Service Narrative
    NMRN FLEET AIR ARM MUSEUM SERVICE NARRATIVE REVIEWED BY THE COLLECTIONS RESEARCH AND LEARNING COMMITTEE OF THE TRUSTEES / 29 NOVEMBER 2017 NMRN FAAM SERVICE NARRATIVE Fleet Air Arm Museum ~ Service Narrative THE FLEET AIR ARM MUSEUM tells the story of NARRATIVE demands of the 21st century, maintaining its ability to project air power from the sea in defence of the UK’s national British naval aviation from its earliest incarnations In 1909, the Royal Navy (RN) ordered its first airship, the interests and also, when called upon, in support of our allies. to the present day – its triumphs and failures, its Mayfly. Two years later, four officers of the RN, one a Royal Marine, became the first Navy pilots using aircraft borrowed ingenuity and innovation, its impact and from a civilian, Frank McClean. They and those who quickly Purpose 1 The Royal Navy’s new, state-of-the-art aircraft carrier, HMS Queen Elizabeth, 2017. importance. followed them were the pioneers tasked with developing the We tell the story of the origins of naval aviation, its cutting-edge and embryonic concept of operating aircraft at 2 Mechanics, Riggers, Pilot and Observer, around 1916. sea. From that time on, British naval aviation has continued development over time and its purpose today. We trace its to demonstrate and enhance those qualities and capabilities evolution from the Royal Naval Air Service (RNAS) and its 3 Landing Royal Marines in Sierra Leone, Operation that make it unique – the innovation, self-reliance and original ‘Eyes in the Sky’ role to the multi-role operations of Silkman, 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Brothers at Sea, the Sinking of HMS Prince of Wales
    Page 1 of 34 Brothers at Sea, The sinking of HMS Prince of Wales By Robert Timson Page 2 of 34 Contents 1. New Recruits 2. Harold (Monty) Banks – HMS Berwick – 1940 3. Robert Banks – HMS Prince of Wales – 1941 4. Force “Z” The Eastern Fleet 5. The sinking of Prince of Wales and Repulse 6. Missing in Action 7. HMS Berwick Arctic Patrol - 1942 8. Remainder of service in R.N 1942-46 Page 3 of 34 Introduction Harold and Robert Banks It was during Christmas leave in 1969 that a young sailor met his future wife on a blind date in Leicester.......... A few days later she introduced him to her parents, both of whom had served in the Royal Navy during the war years. He wasn’t to know then that the friendliness and warmth of their greeting was beyond that of parents meeting their daughter’s boyfriend for the first time. In time he would learn of another young sailor who shared his name and the tragic events that ended his short life. What follows is the true story of two brothers - Harold and Robert Banks, and their experiences in the Royal Navy during World War Two. R.T November 2015 Page 4 of 34 One New Recruits On 31st January 1923 in Felixstowe Suffolk, Harold Owen George was born to his proud parents Richard and Elizabeth Banks. Harold would be the fourth generation in succession to serve in the Royal Navy. His father Richard Owen Banks was a member of the Felixstowe Coastguard Service, having retired from the Royal Navy after twenty years service some four years earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • HONOURS to CANADIANS in the RN in WW2
    HONOURS to CANADIANS in the RN in WW2 BAILLIE-GROHMAN, Harold Tom, Rear-Admiral, DSO, OBE - Companion of the Order of the Bath (CB) - Royal Navy / Commander Middle East - Awarded as per London Gazette of 3 June 1941. 1 Born in Victoria, B.C. on 15 January 1888. Joined the Royal Navy as a Naval Cadet, RN in HMS Britannia in 1903. Promoted to Sub-Lieutenant 1907 and served in HMS Prince of Wales. He was promoted to Lieutenant in 1909. He served in WW1 in the Grand Fleet, in Dover Patrol in destroyers and minesweepers. Promoted to Lieutenant-Commander in 1917. Awarded DSO as per London Gazette of 17 April 1918. Promoted to Commander in June 1923 and Senior Officer of the First RN Minesweeping Flotilla Persian Gulf from 1922 to 1923. Promoted Captain in 1930 and was a member of the British Naval Mission to China 1931-33 and served as an instructor in the Chinese Navy. He was awarded The Order of Brilliant Jade (Red Cravat with blue & White Border) as per the London Gazette of 4 June 1937: "Conferred by the President of the National Government of the Republic of China in recognition of valuable services rendered by him as an Instructor in the Chinese Navy." Commanding Officer, First Destroyer Flotilla Mediterranean form 1934 to 1936. Commanding Officer of HMS St. Vincent. Commanding Officer of Boys Training Establishment from 1936 to 1938. Commanding Officer of HMS Ramillies in 1939, part of 1st Battle Squadron, Mediterranean. Attached to the General Officer Commanding Middle East in 1941. Promoted to Rear-Admiral in 1941 and he was chiefly responsible for shore to ship arrangements for the evacuation of British Forces from Greece in 1941 for which he was awarded the CB.
    [Show full text]