DOCSLIB.ORG

Poverty and Child Health in the United States COUNCIL on COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Poverty and Child Health in the United States COUNCIL on COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS POLICY STATEMENT Organizational Principles to Guide and Define the Child Health Care System and/or Improve the Health of all Children Poverty and Child Health in the United States COUNCIL ON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS Almost half of young children in the United States live in poverty or near abstract poverty. The American Academy of Pediatrics is committed to reducing and ultimately eliminating child poverty in the United States. Poverty and related social determinants of health can lead to adverse health outcomes in childhood and across the life course, negatively affecting physical health, socioemotional development, and educational achievement. The American Academy of Pediatrics advocates for programs and policies that have been shown to improve the quality of life and health outcomes for children and families living in poverty. With an awareness and understanding of the effects of poverty on children, pediatricians and other pediatric health practitioners in a family-centered medical home can assess the fi nancial stability of families, link families to resources, and coordinate care with community partners. Further research, advocacy, and continuing education This document is copyrighted and is property of the American Academy of Pediatrics and its Board of Directors. All authors have will improve the ability of pediatricians to address the social determinants fi led confl ict of interest statements with the American Academy of Pediatrics. Any confl icts have been resolved through a process of health when caring for children who live in poverty. Accompanying this approved by the Board of Directors. The American Academy of policy statement is a technical report that describes current knowledge on Pediatrics has neither solicited nor accepted any commercial involvement in the development of the content of this publication. child poverty and the mechanisms by which poverty infl uences the health Policy statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics benefi t and well-being of children. from expertise and resources of liaisons and internal (AAP) and external reviewers. However, policy statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics may not refl ect the views of the liaisons or the organizations or government agencies that they represent. The guidance in this statement does not indicate an exclusive course STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate. Poverty is an important social determinant of health and contributes to All policy statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics child health disparities. Children who experience poverty, particularly automatically expire 5 years after publication unless reaffi rmed, revised, or retired at or before that time. during early life or for an extended period, are at risk of a host of adverse health and developmental outcomes through their life course.1 Poverty DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-0339 has a profound effect on specific circumstances, such as birth weight, PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275). infant mortality, language development, chronic illness, environmental Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics exposure, nutrition, and injury. Child poverty also influences genomic function and brain development by exposure to toxic stress, 2 a condition characterized by “excessive or prolonged activation of the physiologic To cite: AAP COUNCIL ON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS. Poverty stress response systems in the absence of the buffering protection and Child Health in the United States. Pediatrics. 2016; 137(4):e20160339 afforded by stable, responsive relationships.”3 Children living in poverty Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 3, 2021 PEDIATRICS Volume 137 , number 4 , April 2016 :e 20160339 FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS are at increased risk of difficulties poverty during and immediately American Indian/Alaska Native with self-regulation and executive after the Great Recession of children are 3 times more likely to function, such as inattention, 2007–2009. A later 2014 report live in poverty than are white and impulsivity, defiance, and poor peer from the Organization for Economic Asian children.15 Infants and toddlers relationships.4 Poverty can make Cooperation and Development10 more commonly live in poverty than parenting difficult, especially in the ranked the United States 35th of 40 do older children. context of concerns about inadequate nations, only above Chile, Mexico, Children may be born into poverty, food, energy, transportation, and Romania, Turkey, and Israel. remain in a poor household housing. This policy statement specifically throughout childhood, or, most addresses child poverty in the United Child poverty is associated commonly, rotate in and out of States but reflects the 2015 United with lifelong hardship. Poor poverty over time. Approximately Nations’ Sustainability Goal to end developmental and psychosocial 37% of all children live in poverty poverty in all its forms everywhere.11 outcomes are accompanied by a for some period during their significant financial burden, not just According to 2014 Census data, an childhood.16 Children who are born for the children and families who estimated 21.1% of all US children into poverty and live persistently in experience them but also for the younger than 18 years (15.5 million) poor conditions are at greatest risk rest of society. Children who do not lived in households designated as of adverse outcomes. However, even complete high school, for example, “poor” (ie, in 2014, incomes below short-term spells of poverty can are more likely to become teenage 100% of the federal poverty level expose children to hardships, such as parents, to be unemployed, and to [FPL] of $24 230 for a family of food insecurity, housing insecurity/ be incarcerated, all of which exact 4*) and 42.9% (over 31.5 million) homelessness, loss of health care, and heavy social and economic costs.5 lived in households designated as school disruptions. A growing body of research shows “poor, near poor, or low income” Equality of opportunity is central to that child poverty is associated with (ie, incomes up to 200% of the FPL). the American dream and is reflected neuroendocrine dysregulation that Nearly 9.3% (6.8 million) lived in by social mobility or the potential may alter brain function and may households of deep poverty (ie, of intergenerational economic contribute to the development of incomes below 50% of the FPL).12 betterment. However, social mobility chronic cardiovascular, immune, and In 2014, an estimated 16 million is difficult to measure, because the psychiatric disorders.6 The economic children lived in families who usual method compares incomes cost of child poverty to society can received Supplemental Nutrition of 30-year-old persons against the be estimated by anticipating future Assistance Program (SNAP) incomes of their parents. Despite the lost productivity and increased benefits.13 Between 2007 and 2010, difficulties, most researchers agree social expenditure. A study compiled foreclosures affected 5.3 million that social mobility in the United before 2008 projected a total cost children.14 States has faltered as the wealth of approximately $500 billion each Demographics have a profound and opportunity gaps between year through decreased productivity influence on the likelihood that a rich and poor have widened in and increased costs of crime and family or community will experience the past decade. In comparison health care, 7 nearly 4% of the gross poverty or low income. For example, with European and other wealthy domestic product. Other studies of African American, Hispanic, and industrialized countries, social “opportunity youth, ” young people mobility in the United States ranks 16 to 24 years of age who are neither * The FPL is determined by comparing a among the lowest.17 A 2015 Pew employed nor in school, derived family’s pretax cash income to an income Charitable Trusts report documented similar results, generating cohort poverty threshold that is 3 times the cost of that the effect of parental income aggregate lifetime costs in the a minimum food diet. This measure does not take into account government benefi ts (eg, advantage is persistent over all trillions.8 SNAP), income tax credits, or family expenses levels of parental income but is Child poverty is greater in the United (eg, child care, income taxes) and has not especially strong for children born to fundamentally changed since 1969 except for States than in most countries with annual adjustments for food price infl ation. In wealthy families. Persistent parental comparable resources. In a 2012 2010, the SPM was instituted to provide a more economic advantage means that a report from the United Nations comprehensive measure of a family’s fi nancial son’s income is strongly influenced Children’s Fund, 9 the United States circumstances. The SPM includes the value by his father’s, indicating low social ranked 34th of 35 member nations of certain federal in-kind benefi ts, federal tax mobility. The result is a dramatic benefi ts, and family expenses. For additional of the Organization for Economic details on these measures, see the accompanying decline of the possibility of economic 18 Cooperation and Development, technical report, “Mediators and Adverse Effects improvement for the poor. Poor a reflection of the rate of child of Child Poverty in the United States.” children tend to remain poor and live Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 3, 2021 2 FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS in neighborhoods of low opportunity. improved understanding of the root effect of safety net programs Wealthy children continue to be causes and distal effects of poverty, has been demonstrably positive. wealthy as adults and enjoy academic pediatricians can apply interventions Longitudinal studies from 1967 to and employment advantages. in practice to help address the toxic 2012 that used the Supplemental The drag on social mobility resulting effects of poverty on children and Poverty Measure (SPM) revealed that from income and opportunity families.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 7 Child Poverty and Well-Being in China in the Era of Economic Reforms and External Opening *
    HARNESSING GLOBALISATION FOR CHILDREN: A report to UNICEF Chapter 7 Child poverty and well-being in China in the era of economic reforms and external opening * Lu Aiguo and Wei Zhong Summary: During its period of reforms and openness China has achieved positive results in per capita income growth and poverty reduction. However, there is evidence that the most significant progress in poverty reduction occurred in the early days of reform when openness and trade liberalization were not yet playing a major role. At the same time, increasing income inequality (in particular the inequality between regions and between rural and urban areas) explains the persistence of poverty in the midst of rapid growth and jeopardizes the broad-based growth pattern. The chapter examines the changes in child well-being in China over the last two decades, with poverty as the central focus. Its policy recommendations insist on the role of central government in sustaining the rural economy and “developing the west” to reduce the bias for east-coastal and urban development. Policies to accelerate the establishment of social safety nets, welfare programmes – particularly those targeted at children – and the enforcement of reasonable labour and social standards for small and medium-sized enterprises are also necessary to reinforce the ‘equality’ that is currently in short supply in China. JEL: D63, F43, I31, J13 * This study presents the views of its authors and not the official UNICEF position in this field. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------- CHAPTER 7: CHILD WELL-BEING IN CHINA IN THE ERA OF ECONOMIC REFORMS This is chapter 7 of the overall study “Harnessing Globalisation for Children” edited by Giovanni Andrea Cornia 2 HARNESSING GLOBALISATION FOR CHILDREN: A report to UNICEF 1.
    [Show full text]
  • CHILD POVERTY, EVIDENCE and POLICY Mainstreaming Children in International Development
    child_poverty_aw_pb_v1:Policy Press Cover 02/02/2011 14:25 Page 1 C H “This book is a significant and timely contribution to an improved I understanding of the neglected but all-too-important subject of child poverty L D and what to do about it. It is a 'must read' for researchers and policy makers interested in child poverty and evidence-based advocacy and public policy.” P O Dr Assefa Bequele, Director, African Child Policy Forum V E R “Jones and Sumner provide a sophisticated analysis of the multi-dimensional T interplay between evidence and policy on child poverty. The result is a Y , compelling account of why child poverty in developing countries needs to be E tackled by increasing children's visibility, voice and vision in both knowledge V I generation and policy processes. Academics and policy audiences alike will D find it invaluable.” E N Sandra Nutley, Professor of Public Management, University of Edinburgh C Business School E A This book concerns the opportunities and challenges involved in mainstreaming N knowledge generated by and about children into international development policy and D practice. It focuses on the ideas, networks and institutions that shape the development of P evidence about child poverty and wellbeing, and the use of such evidence in development O L policy debates. It also pays particular attention to the importance of power relations in I influencing the extent to which children's voices are heard and acted upon by international C Y development actors. The book weaves together theory, mixed methods approaches and case studies spanning a number of policy sectors and diverse developing country contexts • in Africa, Asia and Latin America.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Poverty in TANZANIA
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA Child Poverty in TANZANIA Report based on 2014/2015 National Panel Survey SUMMARY REPORT Copyright © National Bureau of Statistics [Tanzania] and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), 2018 Cover photo: © UNICEF Tanzania/Kate Holt Suggested citation: National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). 2018. Child Poverty in Tanzania based on 2014/2015 National Panel Survey – Summary Report: September 2018. Dar es Salaam: NBS and UNICEF. THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA Child Poverty in Tanzania Report based on 2014/2015 National Panel Survey SUMMARY REPORT National Bureau of Statistics and United Nations Children’s Fund Dar es Salaam, Tanzania December 2018 CHILD POVERTY IN TANZANIA | REPORT BASED ON 2014/2015 NATIONAL PANEL SURVEY i ii SUMMARY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ iv Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... v Foreword .................................................................................................................................. vii Defi nition of key concepts ....................................................................................................... ix Background ................................................................................................................................ 1 Multidimensional poverty
    [Show full text]
  • Child Poverty, Unintentional Injuries and Foodborne Illness: Are Low-Income Children at Greater Risk?
    Prepared by Consumer Federation of America Sponsored by Underwriters Laboratories Inc. June 2013 CHILD POVERTY, UNINTENTIONAL INJURIES AND FOODBORNE ILLNESS Are Low-Income Children at Greater Risk? This report was prepared by the Consumer Federation of America (CFA). CFA is a non-profit association of nearly 300 consumer organizations that was founded in 1968 to advance the consumer interest through research, advocacy, and education. Since then, it has taken leadership on product safety and food safety issues by initiating and helping maintain coalitions and organizations such as Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety and the Safe Food Coalition, preparing and distributing numerous publications includingThe Product Safety Book, and successfully supporting numerous public policies to establish new consumer protections and strengthen federal safety agencies.The opinions and conclusions contained in this report are solely those of CFA. For more information, go to consumerfed.org. The report was sponsored by UL (Underwriters Laboratories Inc.). UL is a premier global independent safety science company with more than 118 years of history. Employing more than 10,000 professionals with customers in over 100 countries, UL has five distinct business units – Product Safety, Environment, Life & Health, Knowledge Services, andVerification Services – to meet the expanding needs of our customers and to deliver on our public safety mission. For more information on UL’s family of companies and network of 95 laboratory, testing, and certification facilities, go to UL.com. Introduction Unintentional injuries represent the leading cause of death for children between the ages of one and fourteen. They are responsible for approximately 5,000 child deaths, about 5 million child emergency room visits, and millions of unreported injuries each year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vicious Cycle: Poor Children, Risky Lives
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository The University Dialogue Discovery Program 2008 The vicious cycle: poor children, risky lives Bruce L. Mallory University of New Hampshire, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/discovery_ud Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons Recommended Citation Mallory, Bruce L., "The vicious cycle: poor children, risky lives" (2008). The University Dialogue. 40. https://scholars.unh.edu/discovery_ud/40 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Discovery Program at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The University Dialogue by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Vicious Cycle: Poor Children, Risky Lives Bruce L. Mallory Education Department Provost and Executive Vice President t first blush, New Hampshire would seem the state are eligible to receive a free or reduced price to be a great place for children, parents, and lunch at school (a reasonable proxy for overall com- families, and in many ways it is. The state is munity economic status). But almost all (83 percent) Atypically ranked among the most affluent, most healthy, of children at one Manchester elementary school are least crowded, most scenic, and most educated of all eligible, two-thirds of children at a Rochester elemen- states in the nation. The average per capita income in tary school are eligible, and over half of the children New Hampshire has consistently been in the top ten.
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Economic Policy to Childhood Poverty: a Review of the Evidence on Growth, Trade Reform and Macroeconomic Policy
    CHIP Report No 7 CHIP Report No 7 Linking Economic Policy to Childhood Poverty: A review of the evidence on growth, trade reform and macroeconomic policy Hugh Waddington Childhood Poverty Research and Policy Centre LINKING ECONOMIC POLICY TO CHILHOOD POVERTY - CHIP REPORT NO. 7 Preface This paper is one of a series of working papers, reports and policy briefings on different aspects of childhood poverty published by the Childhood Poverty Research and Policy Centre (CHIP). CHIP is a collaborative research and policy initiative involving academic institutions and Save the Children in China, India, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia and the UK. It aims to: ● deepen understanding of the main causes of childhood poverty and poverty cycles, and increase knowledge of effective strategies to tackle it in different contexts ● inform effective policy to end childhood poverty, ensuring that research findings are widely communicated to policy-makers, practitioners and advocates ● raise the profile of childhood poverty issues and increase the urgency of tackling them through anti-poverty policy and action ● work globally to tackle chronic and childhood poverty in developing and transition countries. Financial support from the Chronic Poverty Research Centre, the UK Department for International Development - DFID - (grant no. R8005), Save the Children UK and the International Save the Children Alliance have made this publication possible and are gratefully acknowledged. For further information and to download all our publications, visit www.childhoodpoverty.org. Acknowledgements Thanks to Rachel Marcus, David Woodward, Howard White and Caroline Harper who provided invaluable comments. The author is responsible for all errors. The views in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of CHIP, CPRC, DFID or Save the Children.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Very High Rates of Young Child Poverty in the South
    Issue BrIef No. 21 Carsey Summer 2010 i n s t i t u t e understanding Very High rates of young Child Poverty in the south M a r y b e t H J. Mattingly and Cat H e r i n e t u r C o t t e - s e a b u r y ore children live in poverty in the rural south than in 2008, the federal poverty threshold for a couple with two in any other region of the country. in 2008, 17 children in the united states was $21,834.3 percent of families with children under age 18 in The very youngest children are particularly vulnerable. Mthe south lived in poverty, according to the american Com- nationally, the poverty rate for children under age 6 has been munity survey (aCs) (see table 1).1 in contrast, an estimated increasing slowly but steadily from 19 percent in 2000 to 21 13 percent of families in the northeast and 14 percent in percent in 2008.4 in the south, where young child poverty the Midwest and West were living below the poverty line. rates are consistently the highest, the percentage of children under age 6 in poverty stood at almost 24 percent in 2008. Poverty is alarmingly high in rural areas and central cities in the south, where nearly one in three children under age 6 now lives in poverty.5 some southern states experience far Key Findings higher rates. in this brief, we outline some of the demograph- • Poverty rates are significantly higher in the South ic patterns associated with high poverty rates among children 6 for all families (11 percent), and for families with in the south.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Coronavirus on Food Insecurity in 2020 & 2021
    March 2021 The Impact of the Coronavirus on Food Insecurity in 2020 & 2021 Updated analysis of how national food insecurity levels may have increased in 2020 because of COVID-19 and new analysis of projected food insecurity levels in 2021. Introduction In early 2020, the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) began to spread across the United States, and one of the results was an economic recession that ended years of declining rates of food insecurity – the lack of access to sufficient food because of limited financial resources. This brief provides a snapshot of food insecurity at the national level leading up to the COVID- 19 pandemic, what transpired in the first year of the pandemic, and what may happen in the next year and beyond.1 KEY FINDINGS 1. Feeding America projects that 42 million people (1 in 8), including 13 million children (1 in 6), may experience food insecurity in 2021. 2. This is a slight improvement from our updated 2020 projections (45 million people and 15 million children). 3. Many people who have been most impacted by the pandemic were food insecure or at risk of food insecurity before COVID-19 and are facing greater hardship since COVID-19. 4. Significant racial disparities in food insecurity which existed before COVID-19 remain in the wake of the pandemic. Feeding America projects that 21% of Black individuals (1 in 5) may experience food insecurity in 2021, compared to 11% of white individuals (1 in 9). 5. It will likely take time for food insecurity levels to recover. FOOD INSECURITY BEFORE COVID-19 In 2019, the overall food insecurity rate was the lowest it had been in more than twenty years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unheard Voices of Children Living in Poverty in Indonesia
    SMERU Research Report Urban Child Poverty and Disparity: The Unheard Voices of Children living in Poverty in Indonesia c Luhur Bima Cecilia Marlina Rachma Nurbani Emmy Hermanus Rendy Diningrat Sofni Lubis *This document has been approved for online preview but has not been through the copyediting and proofreading process which may lead to differences between this version and the final version. Please cite this document as "draft". SMERU RESEARCH REPORT Urban Child Poverty and Disparity: The Unheard Voices of Children Living in Poverty in Indonesia Luhur Bima Rachma Nurbani Rendy Diningrat Cecilia Marlina Emmy Hermanus Sofni Lubis The SMERU Research Institute May 2017 RESEARCH TEAM SMERU Researchers Luhur Bima Rachma Nurbani Rendy Diningrat Cecilia Marlina Emmy Hermanus Mirza Annisa Izati Sofni Lubis This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. SMERU's content may be copied or distributed for noncommercial use provided that it is appropriately attributed to The SMERU Research Institute. In the absence of institutional arrangements, PDF formats of SMERU’s publications may not be uploaded online and online content may only be published via a link to SMERU’s website. The findings, views, and interpretations published in this report are those of the authors and should not be attributed to any of the agencies providing financial support to The SMERU Research Institute. A significant part of the research in this publication uses interviews and focus group discussions. All relevant information is recorded and stored at the SMERU office. For further information on SMERU’s publications, please contact us on 62-21-31936336 (phone), 62-21-31930850 (fax), or [email protected] (e-mail); or visit www.smeru.or.id.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty and Exclusion Among Urban Children
    INNOCENTI DIGEST No.10 - November 2002 POVERTY AND EXCLUSION AMONG URBAN CHILDREN The cities of the world are often regarded as hubs of wealth and privilege, POVERTY but they are also home to hundreds of millions of children for whom poverty and exclusion are a daily reality. Some of these children live on the street; many more live in dangerous, insanitary housing which often lacks the most basic amenities, including clean water and satisfactory sanitation. AND EXCLUSION These urban children rarely have access to adequate services, including schooling, or to safe areas for play and recreation. The imperative of eco- nomic survival can mean not only that parents are unable to dedicate suf- ficient time to childcare, but also that children themselves are forced to work, often in hazardous conditions. Yet all this need not be the case: this Digest examines the potential of good urban governance founded upon human rights principles to promote positive change for and with children. The key to eradicating urban poverty and exclusion lies in the develop- ment of child-friendly cities where children’s rights are made a priority in budgeting, planning and resource allocation and where children’s voices inform the democratic process. AMONG URBAN CHILDREN UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre Piazza SS Annunziata, 12 50122 Florence, Italy Tel.: +39 055 203 30 Fax: +39 055 244 817 Email (general information): [email protected] Email (publication orders): [email protected] Website: www.unicef-icdc.org ISSN: 1028-3528 POVERTY AND EXCLUSION AMONGM URBAN CHILDREN CONTENTS EDITORIAL For many, the image of a malnourished child, a child living in miserable circumstances and lacking EDITORIAL 1 access to basic social services, has a rural backdrop.
    [Show full text]
  • A Roadmap to Reducing Child Poverty Summary
    Committee on Building an Agenda to Reduce the Number of Children in Poverty by Half in 10 Years Greg Duncan and Suzanne Le Menestrel, Editors Board on Children, Youth, and Families and Committee on National Statistics Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education A Consensus Study Report of THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 This activity was supported by contracts and grants between the National Acad- emy of Sciences and the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, Inc. (2017032); the Foundation for Child Development (NAS-03-2017); the Joyce Foundation (17- 37856); the Russell Sage Foundation (83-18-04); Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHSP233201400020B, Order No. HHSP2337058); the William T. Grant Foun- dation (187516); and the W.K. Kellogg Foundation (P0130499). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-48398-8 International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-48398-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2019945735 Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17226/25246 Additional copies of this Summary are available in limited quantities from the Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001. Copies of A Roadmap to Reducing Child Poverty, from which this Summary was extracted, are available for sale from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http:// www.nap.edu/25246.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty Through a Gender Lens: Evidence and Policy Review on Gender and Poverty
    DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL POLICY AND INTERVENTION Poverty through a Gender Lens: Evidence and Policy Review on Gender and Poverty Fran Bennett and Mary Daly for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation May 2014 Contact details Fran Bennett Senior Research and Teaching Fellow [email protected] Mary Daly Professor of Sociology and Social Policy [email protected] Department of Social Policy and Intervention University of Oxford Barnett House, 32 Wellington Square Oxford, OX1 2ER 2 Acknowledgments This review has benefited from input from a wide range of people, in particular Joseph Rowntree Foundation staff past and present (especially Chris Goulden, Helen Barnard, Conor D’Arcy and Sanne Velthuis). We are also very grateful to the participants in a consultative seminar held in November 2013 (especially to Jane Falkingham and Robert Walker who chaired sessions, Tess Ridge and Mike Brewer who were respondents, and Saltanat Rasulova who took notes), and to those who commented on our draft material. Many thanks to JRF for timely editorial assistance. Information and ideas about literature and other sources were provided to the review by researchers involved in other JRF reviews and the anti-poverty programme more generally; members of the group of independent experts on social inclusion for the European Commission; and many individuals, including Stuart Adam, Vidhya Alakeson, Tania Burchardt, Claire Callender, Bea Cantillon, Sylvia Chant, Yekaterina Chzhen, Mary Collins, Hazel Conley, Kate Donald, Carol Fuller, Helen Gibson, Jay Ginn, Anne Green, Susan Harkness, Alison Healicon, Sue Himmelweit, Donald Hirsch, Marilyn Howard, Stephen Jenkins, Man Yee Kan, Hilary Land, Erin Leigh, Alison Light, Jackie Longworth, Linda McDowell, Ron McQuaid, Jo Morris, David Perfect, Lucinda Platt, Sophie Ponthieux, Lynn Prince Cooke, Sandy Ruxton, Mary Ann Stephenson, Kitty Stewart, Holly Sutherland, Pat Thane, Pamela Trevithick and Athina Vlachantoni.
    [Show full text]