Annual Report 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 2008 Annual Report 2008 This report is published in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2009 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Preface Preface This is the Rail Accident Investigation Branch’s (RAIB) annual report for the calendar Annual Report 2008 RAIB year 2008. It is produced in accordance with the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005 (SI1992) and also meets the requirement of the European Railway Safety Directive (2004/49/EC). Section 1 – explains the background and organisation of the RAIB and sets out its aims, statutory duties and scope of accidents investigated. Section 2 – provides details of the RAIB’s investigatory work opened in 2008. Section 3 – provides a brief overview of progress of actions taken to implement recommendations made in RAIB’s reports by the parties identified as the responsible duty-holders, and an analysis of the causes of accidents. Section 4 – provides a summary of other Branch activities. Section 5 – contains the annexes which provide reference material as well as details of completed investigations, investigations opened in 2007 but not completed at the end of 2008, and the status of recommendations. 3 This page is left intentionally blank 4 RAIB Annual Report 2008 RAIB Annual Report 2008 RAIB Contents Chief Inspector’s foreword 6 1. Introduction to the Rail Accident Investigation Branch 8 2. Operations 16 3. Analysis of recommendations and causes 23 4. Other Branch activities 33 Annex A – List of investigations opened in 2006 and completed in 2008 35 List of investigations opened in 2006 and completed in 2008 35 List ofinvestigations opened and completed in 2008 36 Annex B – Summary of investigations opened in 2007 but not completed by 31.12.2008 37 Summary of investigations opened in 2008 but not completed by 31.12.2008 37 Annex C – Recommendation Progress Report 40 Annex C – Appendix 1 – Statistics, recommendations from reports published in 2006, with a status of open or complete in the RAIB 2007 Annual Report 41 Annex C – Appendix 2 – Statistics, recommendations from reports published in 2007, with a status of open or complete in the RAIB 2007 Annual Report 42 Annex C – Appendix 3 – Statistics, recommendations made in 2008 and status 43 Annex C – Appendix 4 – Recommendations made in 2008 to end implementer 44 Annex C – Appendix 5 – Recommendations made in 2006 that had an open or complete status from the 2007 Annual Report 45 Annex C – Appendix 6 – Recommendation made in 2007 that had an open or complete status from the 2007 Annual Report 64 Annex C – Appendix 7 – Recommendation made in 2008 120 Annex C – Appendix 8 – Recommendations closed by ORR between January 2009 and 01 May 2009 164 Annex C – Appendix 9 – List of investigations published in 2008 165 Annex D – Summary of schedules and notification requirements for accident and incidents on UK railways (annexes to the regulations) 166 Annex D – Appendix 1 – Summary of schedules and notification requirements for accident and incidents in the Channel Tunnel 167 Annex E – Statistics: summary of investigations by type and industry sector 168 Annex F – Glossary of abbreviations and acronyms 169 Annex G – Glossary of terms 169 Annex H – Annual Report feedback form 173 5 RAIB Annual Report 2008 RAIB Chief Inspector’s foreword Chief Inspector’s foreword This is the Rail Accident Investigation Branch’s (RAIB) fourth Annual Report. By the end of December 2008, the end of this reporting period, the Branch had been operational for 38 months. The aim of the Branch is to improve the safety of the public, rail passengers and rail staff by investigating accidents and near misses on the UK’s railways. This includes the mainline railway, metros, tramways and heritage railways. The Annual Report provides an opportunity to share information about the work and findings of the RAIB, and to publish the actions that have been taken in response to our safety recommendations. In February 2007 a rail accident occurred in Grayrigg, Cumbria where sadly, a lady lost her life, and 30 others were seriously injured. Last year was a particularly busy period for the Branch, the Grayrigg investigation, published in October 2008, generated a considerably higher workload than the other investigations we have undertaken to date. Nevertheless, during 2008, the Branch commenced 31 new investigations and published 27 reports and 3 bulletins. At this time we were still establishing our organisation and only operating with 75% of our intended compliment of investigators. The further staff, who will largely complete our establishment, are joining us now in 2009; they will join the investigator team once they complete their training. I am pleased that we continue to have a very positive relationship with the organisations in the industry whose interest and engagement play a significant part in the success of our investigations. The safety arrangements in the UK are such that for the vast majority of RAIB recommendations it is the Safety Authority’s responsibility to ensure the industry takes appropriate measures. The RAIB’s follow up on recommendations is limited to when this is relevant to a further investigation. The feedback from the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR), the safety authority for the majority of the UK’s railway system, indicates that for those recommendations where they have concluded their follow up, indicates there has been a running average of 98% reported as accepted and either implemented or in the process of implementation. The Branch is therefore bringing about positive changes and improvements to safety. The RAIB has now reached a very interesting juncture. In earlier RAIB annual reports I have remarked that because we have not been operational for long, and because we do not investigate all accidents on UK’s railways, we have not had a large data set on which to base observations. However, from the number of investigations we have now completed, there is clear evidence that some types of accident are recurring for the same or similar reasons; in some cases it is because the RAIB’s previous recommendations have yet to be implemented, or that they have not been implemented fully. The RAIB is now finding in more recent investigations that we are identifying the need for the same preventative measures as we have previously recommended. There are a number of key areas of industry activity where this has occurred including: l worksite planning and management; l management of fatigue for safety critical staff; l planning possessions and the weaknesses in the arrangements for conveying key information to safety critical staff; l inspection standards for track and related guidance to staff; 6 Chief Inspector’s foreword l location and signage of decision points at crossings, examination and assessment of risks associated with crossings and design for good sighting; and l management and operation of Road Rail vehicles. Annual Report 2008 RAIB These occurrences, which we have already brought to Network Rail’s attention, are a powerful message to the industry about the ongoing risks. Through its reports, the RAIB continues to bring recurring issues to the industry’s attention and believes that greater benefit can be obtained if our investigation reports, and their own, are considered in a wider context rather than just treating each report in isolation. Due to the timing of publication of the RAIB’s report into the Grayrigg accident the feedback on the recommendations is not covered in this Annual Report. In view of the seriousness of that accident, I feel this foreword would not be complete if it did not include comment on the status of delivery of the recommendations. The main focus of our recommendations concerned the design and maintenance of track points, and Network Rail’s safety management systems. Throughout the investigation, the RAIB worked closely with the industry and the ORR, and our emerging findings and areas of recommendations were made known to the industry as the investigation progressed. However, at the time of this publication, 11 months after the RAIB’s Grayrigg recommendations were published, for those recommendations where the industry have indicated that they intend to take measures, or believe that they have already taken sufficient action, the RAIB is not yet aware of the full details or the implementation timeframes. The ORR has reported that Network Rail has indicated to them that it has completed 15 of the 22 recommendations directed to Network Rail. However, the ORR is still in the process of satisfying itself whether the RAIB’s recommendations have been properly acted upon. The exception is for one recommendation made to Network Rail concerning working hours of staff engaged in safety critical work; in this case the ORR has stated that it does not intend to exercise its powers to require action of Network Rail. The RAIB is in dialogue with the ORR to secure greater clarity; it is the ORR’s sanction to follow up the recommendations made to industry.
Recommended publications
  • Solent to the Midlands Multimodal Freight Strategy – Phase 1
    OFFICIAL SOLENT TO THE MIDLANDS MULTIMODAL FREIGHT STRATEGY – PHASE 1 JUNE 2021 OFFICIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 2. STRATEGIC AND POLICY CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................... 11 3. THE IMPORTANCE OF THE SOLENT TO THE MIDLANDS ROUTE ........................................................................................................ 28 4. THE ROAD ROUTE ............................................................................................................................................................................. 35 5. THE RAIL ROUTE ............................................................................................................................................................................... 40 6. KEY SECTORS .................................................................................................................................................................................... 50 7. FREIGHT BETWEEN THE SOLENT AND THE MIDLANDS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms
    While Oxfordshire County Council has made every effort to ensure the information in this document is accurate, it does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of the information contained in this document and it cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the information or guidance this document contains. © Copyright, Oxfordshire County Council, 2012 Copyright in the typographical arrangements rests with Oxfordshire County Council. This publication, excluding logos, may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for non- commercial research, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The title must be acknowledged as copyright and the title of the publication specified. Unless specified, all maps, tables, diagrams and graphs in this report are a product of Oxfordshire County Council. Editorial Acknowledgement - Adrian Saunders, James Llewellyn, Ed Webster & John Disley. ● ● In January 2012, the Council‟s Cabinet approved a version of the draft Oxfordshire Rail Strategy & Delivery Plan for public and stakeholder consultation. The consultation was launched on 6 February and was made available on the Council‟s e- consultation portal, making it possible for responses to be submitted using a questionnaire online or by returning a pre-formatted document in the post. The consultation lasted for six weeks and ended on 16 March 2012. Invitations to take part in the consultation were sent to 650 individuals or organisations that have an interest in the rail network, including district and parish councils, local businesses using the railway as part of the business activity, Oxfordshire Local Enterprise Partnership, interest groups, such as Oxfordshire Unlimited and Railfuture, and council staff involved in planning, strategy, infrastructure and economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 14 Prepared Oxfordshire 2050 Plan and Including Meeting Jobs and Housing Growth Targets
    PROGRESS REPORT February 2021 for Members of the Executive Committee Items included here are for information and reference. Please address any comments or queries to the relevant contributor. 1. Oxfordshire Futures Group Ian Green 723289 This report is experimental, attempting to show what progress has been made by the OFG towards achieving the Society’s Aims. Aim 1 – Influence the development of Oxford as a city where people enjoy living, working and visiting Aim 2 – Inform its members - and others – about Oxford: its key qualities, as well as its problems, with constructive and soundly based proposals for its further improvement Aim 3 – Co-operate with Oxford’s residents’ associations and civic societies nationally to develop – and campaign for – community led solutions to shared problems Aim 4 – Learn from other cities, in both the UK and abroad, where creative strategies might be helpful to Oxford. 1.1 STRATEGIC PLANNING 1.1. 1 The ARC The Government has announced its intention to create a 'Spatial Framework' and a new 'Growth Body' to oversee the preparation and implementation of the Framework. The spatial framework will have the status of national planning policy. It was also announced that a Growth Body for the Oxford-Cambridge Arc will also be established. It is not clear from the document what form this Body will take. Planning for sustainable growth in the Oxford-Cambridge Arc (publishing.service.gov.uk) The announcements have re-ignited concern about the remoteness of decision making from communities and locally elected representatives. CPRE and the POETs have led the way in expressing their concern1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Cherwell Heritage and Character Assessment April 2017
    MID-CHERWELL HERITAGE AND CHARACTER ASSESSMENT APRIL 2017 CONTENTS Introduction and Approach ................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Context ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Historical Development ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Landscape Context ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Character Assessment ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Managing Change .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 76 Next Steps ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Serial Active Designation Or Undertaking?
    Serial Active Designation Description of Record or Artefact Registered Disposal to / Date of Date of disposal / Company/ies Designation, Class or Undertaking? Number Current Designation de-designation Concerned at Designation or Responsible Meeting Designation Undertaking Organisation 1 YES Brunel Drawings: structural drawings produced 1995/01 Network Rail 22/09/1995 Railtrack PLC Designation for Great Western Rly Co or its associated Infrastructure Ltd Companies between 1833 and 1859 [operational property] 2 NO The Gooch Centrepiece 1995/02 National Railway 22/09/1995 22/09/1995 British Railways Disposal Museum Board 3 NO Classes of Record: Memorandum and Articles 1995/03 N/A 24/11/1995 21/05/1999 All companies not Designation of Association; Annual Reports; Minutes and privatised at working papers of main board; principal 24/11/1995 subsidiaries and any sub-committees whether standing or ad hoc; Organisation charts; Staff newsletters/papers and magazines; Files relating to preparation of principal legislation where company was in lead in introducing legislation 4 NO Railtrack Group PLC Archive 1995/03 National Railway 24/11/1995 12/12/2008 Railtrack PLC Disposal Museum 5 YES Class 08 Locomotive no. 08616 (formerly D 1996/01 London & 22/03/1996 21/05/1999 Central Trains Ltd Designation 3783) (last locomotive to be rebuilt at Swindon Birmingham Works) Railway Ltd 6 YES Brunel Drawings: structural drawings produced 1996/02 BRB (Residuary) 22/03/1996 British Railways Designation for Great Western Rly Co or its associated Ltd Board Companies
    [Show full text]
  • Hanborough Station Transport Infrastructure Study Baseline Review
    West Oxfordshire District Council Hanborough Station Transport Infrastructure Study Baseline Review September 2019 Hanborough Station Infrastructure Study – Baseline Review Hanborough Station Transport Infrastructure Study Baseline Review Version 3-0 September 2019 Produced by: For: Contact: Geoff Burrage Integrated Transport Planning Ltd. 6 Hay’s Lane London Bridge London SE1 2HB UNITED KINGDOM 0203 300 1810 [email protected] www.itpworld.net ii Hanborough Station Infrastructure Study – Baseline Review Project Information Sheet Client West Oxfordshire District Council Project Code 2849 Project Name Hanborough Station Transport Infrastructure Study Project Director Neil Taylor Project Manager Geoff Burrage Quality Manager Neil Taylor Additional Team Members Sandy Moller, Lewis McAuliffe Sub-Consultants N/A Start Date 2nd March 2019 File Location F:\2800-2899\2849 Hanborough Station Transport Infrastructure Study\Project Files\Baseline Document Control Sheet Ver. Project Folder Description Prep. Rev. App. Date V3-0 F:\2800-2899\2849 Final LM GB NT 30/09/2019 V2-0 F:\2800-2899\2849 Final draft for LM GB NT 13/09/2019 OCC review V1-2 F:\2800-2899\2849 Final draft for LM GB NT 03/06/2019 WOCC review V1-1 F:\2800-2899\2849 Final draft for LM GB NT 27/05/2019 WODC review V1-0 F:\2800-2899\2849 Draft LM GB - 15/05/2019 Notice This report has been prepared for West Oxfordshire District Council in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment. Integrated Transport Planning Ltd cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. iii Hanborough Station Infrastructure Study – Baseline Review Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • West Oxfordshire Local Plan 2031 SUBMISSION DRAFT INCLUDING PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS
    www.westoxon.gov.uk West Oxfordshire Local Plan 2031 SUBMISSION DRAFT INCLUDING PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS November 2016 Contents Index of Proposed Main Modifications ................................................................................ 4 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 11 The Role and Status of the Local Plan ............................................................................................... 11 The Plan Period ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Key Influences ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Structure and Content .......................................................................................................................... 12 Measuring Progress ................................................................................................................................ 13 Reviewing the Local Plan ...................................................................................................................... 13 2. WEST OXFORDSHIRE IN 2016 ........................................................................... 14 3. WEST OXFORDSHIRE IN 2031 – OUR VISION ................................................. 24 Our Core Objectives ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Oxfordshire Rail Strategy & Delivery Plan Draft for Consultation
    111 ● Oxfordshire Rail Strategy & Delivery Plan Draft for Consultation While Oxfordshire County Council has made every effort to ensure the information in this document is accurate, it does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of the information contained in this document and it cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the information or guidance this document contains. © Copyright, Oxfordshire County Council, 2012 Copyright in the typographical arrangements rests with Oxfordshire County Council. This publication, excluding logos, may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for non-commercial research, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The title must be acknowledged as copyright and the title of the publication specified. Unless specified, all maps, tables, diagrams and graphs in this report are a product of Oxfordshire County Council. 222 ● Oxfordshire Rail Strategy & Delivery Plan Draft for Consultation CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................5 PREFACE............................................................................................................................9 CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE OF THE STRATEGY.................................................................10 Background .......................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • West Oxfordshire Council Plan 2019-23 – Evidence Paper Working Draft 12/08/19
    Annex B West Oxfordshire Council Plan 2019-23 – Evidence Paper Working Draft 12/08/19 West Oxfordshire Council Plan 2019-23 Evidence Paper (August 2019) West Oxfordshire Council Plan 2019-23 - Evidence Paper Page 1 of 33 Annex B West Oxfordshire Council Plan 2019-23 – Evidence Paper Working Draft 12/08/19 Contents West Oxfordshire in 2019 - District Characteristics 3 Population 3 Quality of Life 5 Crime and community safety 7 The Local Economy 7 Recent National and Local Economic Policy Context 11 Housing 13 Transport (Local Plan extract) 16 Local Economic Policy Context – Growth and Housing 17 Education 18 Health and well-being 18 Environment - National and Local Policy Context 23 Natural environment (Local Plan extract) 24 Environment – air quality 25 Waste and recycling 25 Carbon emissions and fuel poverty 28 Social and community issues 29 Voluntary and community sector 31 Local Plan – key issues and challenges summary 32 Information sources and acknowledgement The document below provides an overview of evidence about West Oxfordshire. The information summarised in the paper has been drawn from a number of sources. Principal sources include analyses of national statistics undertaken in recent years through the District Data Service (a support service that is jointly supported through the partner Oxfordshire Districts) and analysis that supports Oxfordshire’s Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) in 2019 (led by Oxfordshire County Council). Page 2 of 33 Annex B West Oxfordshire Council Plan 2019-23 – Evidence Paper Working Draft 12/08/19 West Oxfordshire in 2019 - District Characteristics West Oxfordshire is a predominantly rural area with a population of 109,300 (ONS Mid 2017 population estimate).
    [Show full text]
  • Nurail2017-MIT-R04 High-Speed Rail and Local Land Development
    NURail Project ID: NURail2017-MIT-R04 High-Speed Rail and Local Land Development: Case Studies in London and Las Vegas By Daniel R. Mascoop Master in City Planning Department of Urban Studies and Planning Massachusetts Institute of Technology [email protected] Joseph M. Sussman JR East Professor, Emeritus Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering Systems Massachusetts Institute of Technology [email protected] 11-1-2017 Grant Number: DTRT13-G-UTC52 (Grant 2) DISCLAIMER Funding for this research was provided by the NURail Center, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign under Grant No. DTRT13-G-UTC52 of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research & Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Centers Program. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. TECHNICAL SUMMARY Title High-Speed Rail and Local Land Development: Case Studies in London and Las Vegas Introduction The efficacy of a high-speed rail system depends, in part, upon locating rail stations close to urban centers and integrating them into broader transportation networks and the urban realm. In addition, through economies of agglomeration, successful high-speed rail systems can bring wider economic benefits to regions, cities and local areas. Transit-oriented development can be used as a strategy to realize and capture these local-level benefits by connecting the high-speed rail system with urban development.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Scheme List
    Oxfordshire Growth Deal: Infrastructure Scheme List Estimated Growth deal District Scheme Scheme details Year of Delivery final cost contribution The aim of the project is to deliver accessibility and sustainable transport improvements along Tramway Road in Banbury to create a new two-way bus lane and taxi link past Banbury railway Tramway Road accessibility improvement 2023 £3,990,000 £3,210,000 station into the town centre and a new access to the railway station car park to the west. The growth deal is part front funding the scheme which will provide capacity and safety improvements to Junction 10 of the M40 Motorway: Former RAF Upper Heyford phase 2 (M40- - A43/B4100 Baynards Green Roundabout 2023 £18,800,000 £18,800,000 J10 Improvements) - A43 Padbury Roundabout This will support and allow for the acceleration of the on-going housing development taking place at the former RAF base at the Upper Heyford site (Heyford Park) The Growth Deal is front funding the proposed realignment of the A4095 will support the NW Bicester Housing allocation. The scheme will provide a new, straight underpass of the railway line, increasing capacity and high quality for sustainable travel. The scheme will remove the constraint of the skewed low bridge and junctions on each side of the railway line. In addition to the realigned road, the project will include: North West Bicester Realignment of the - Provision of a bus only road link to the east of the railway connecting the new link with Bucknell 2023 £20,000,000 £15,750,000 A4095 Road south to the town centre - Retention of part of Howes Lane and Lords Lane to provide access to and from the existing residential areas to the southeast - Retention of Bucknell Road/ Howes Lane/ Lords Lane junction - New road link from Shakespeare Drive to extend in a one-way direction to connect to the realigned Howes Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Transport Statistics No 30: 2011 Edition
    Scottish Transport Statistics: Scottish Transport No. 30 2011 Edition Scottish Transport Statistics © Crown copyright 2011 ISBN: 978-1-908181-20-6 No. 30 APS Group Scotland 205779 (12/11) 2011 Edition A National Statistics Publication for Scotland www.transportscotland.gov.uk/analysis/statistics Buidheann le Riaghaltas na h-Alba Scottish Transport Statistics No 30 2011 Edition A National Statistics publication for Scotland Brief extracts from this publication may be reproduced, provided that Scottish Transport Statistics is fully acknowledged as the source. Proposals for larger extracts should be addressed to the enquiries address below. Cover Images Rail photo © Devlin Photo Ltd (www.devlinphoto.com). Airport photo © Highlands and Islands Airports Ltd. All other images © Crown copyright. Conventions Symbols used: The following symbols are used throughout: .. not available - or 0 nil or less than half the final digit shown (NB: these are used interchangeably) break in series Rounding: In some tables, where figures have been rounded independently, the sum of constituent items may not always appear to agree exactly with the total shown. Enquiries and suggestions Enquiries about the statistics in this publication should generally be made as indicated in the Further Information sections of the relevant chapters. Other enquiries (such as about the availability of other editions) should be made to: Mr Andrew Knight Transport Statistics branch Transport Scotland Scottish Government Victoria Quay EDINBURGH EH6 6QQ Telephone: 0131 244 7256 FAX: 0131 244 0871 E-mail: [email protected] Suggestions for improvements should be addressed to the above address. Web version of the publication Transport Scotland Statistics publications and Excel spreadsheet versions of the tables may be found on the Transport Scotland Website.
    [Show full text]