Metric Conversion in the Construction Industries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Metric Conversion in the Construction Industries NBS Refc?r©nC© Publi- cations A111LU I1C — NATL INST OF STANDARDS & TECH R.I.C. A11 101 786780 Milton, Hans J/Metric conversion In the QC100 .U57 V598;1980 C.2 NBS-PUB-R 1980 NBS SPECIAL PUBLICATION 598 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE / National Bureau of Standards METRIC CONVERSION IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES — TECHNICAL ISSUES AND STATUS NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS The National Bureau of Standards' was established by an act of Congress on March 3, 1901. The Bureau's overall goal is to strengthen and advance the Nation's science and technology and facilitate their effective application for public benefit. To this end, the Bureau conducts research and provides: (1) a basis for the Nation's physical measurement system, (2) scientific and technological services for industry and government, (3) a technical basis for equity in trade, and (4) technical services to promote public safety. The Bureau's technical work is per- formed by the National Measurement Laboratory, the National Engineering Laboratory, and the Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology. THE NATIONAL MEASUREMENT LABORATORY provides the national system of physical and chemical and materials measurement; coordinates the system with measurement systems of other nations and furnishes essential services leading to accurate and uniform physical and chemical measurement throughout the Nation's scientific community, industry, and commerce; conducts materials research leading to improved methods of measurement, standards, and data on the properties of materials needed by industry, commerce, educational institutions, and Government; provides advisory and research services to other Government agencies; develops, produces, and distributes Standard Reference Materials; and provides calibration services. The Laboratory consists of the following centers: Absolute Physical Quantities 2 — Radiation Research — Thermodynamics and Molecular Science — Analytical Chemistry — Materials Science. THE NATIONAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY provides technology and technical ser- vices to the public and private sectors to address national needs and to solve national problems; conducts research in engineering and applied science in support of these efforts; builds and maintains competence in the necessary disciplines required to carry out this research and technical service; develops engineering data and measurement capabilities; provides engineering measurement traceability services; develops test methods and proposes engineering standards and code changes; develops and proposes new engineering practices; and develops and improves mechanisms to transfer results of its research to the ultimate user. The Laboratory consists of the following centers: Applied Mathematics — Electronics and Electrical Engineering- — Mechanical Engineering and Process Technology 2 — Building Technology — Fire Research — Consumer Product Technology — Field Methods. THE INSTITUTE FOR COMPUTER SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY conducts research and provides scientific and technical services to aid Federal agencies in the selection, acquisition, application, and use of computer technology to improve effectiveness and economy in Government operations in accordance with Public Law 89-306 (40 U.S.C. 759), relevant Executive Orders, and other directives; carries out this mission by managing the Federal Information Processing Standards Program, developing Federal ADP standards guidelines, and managing Federal participation in ADP voluntary standardization activities; provides scientific and technological advisory services and assistance to Federal agencies; and provides the technical foundation for computer-related policies of the Federal Government. The Institute consists of the following centers: Programming Science and Technology — Computer Systems Engineering. 1 Headquarters and Laboratories at Gaithersburg, M D, unless otherwise noted: mailing address Washington, DC 20234. : Some divisions within the center are located at Boulder, CO 80303. National Bureau of Standards Library, E-OJ Admin. Kdg. .. _ , Metric Conversion in the Construction m 4 m Industries—Technical Issues and Status Hans J. Milton Sandra A. Berry Building Economics and Regulatory Technology Division Center for Building Technology National Engineering Laboratory National Bureau of Standards Washington, DC 20234 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Philip M. Klutznick, Secretary Luther H. Hodges, Jr., Deputy Secretary Jordan J. Baruch, Assistant Secretary for Productivity, Technology and Innovation NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Ernest Ambler, Director Issued October 1 980 ) Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 80-600173 National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 598 Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.), Spec. Publ. 598, 144 pages (Oct. 1980) CODEN: XNBSAV U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1980 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Price $5.50 ( Add 25 percent for other than U.S. mailing ABSTRACT This Special Publication was prepared at the request of the Metric Symposium Planning Committee of the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS). It is intended to provide information on technical issues and status of metric conversion in the United States construc- tion industries. It will be made available to attendees at the NIBS Symposium on "Metric Conversion in the Construction Community" to be held December 2-3, 1980, in Chicago, IL. In addition, it will be avail- able to other affected parties in the construction community. The report contains information on planning for the metric change, current metric activities of professional and industry groups, technical implications in the construction industries, dimensional coordination, metric building products and services, research issues, and timing. It is intended to provide assistance for informed decisionmaking relative to metric conversion for the U.S. construction industries. Also included in the report is a bibliography of relevant construction industries' metric technical information. Keywords: Construction industries; dimensional coordination; metric bib- liography; metric conversion timetable; metric decision; metric product sizes; metric system (SI). iii ., PREFACE This report has been prepared as an information paper for those considering issues related to conversion of the building industries to the metric system of measurement. In particular, it is made available for those attending the Sympos ium on "Metric Conversion in the Construc- tion Community ," to be held in Chicago, IL, on December 2-3, 1980. The Symposium is being held under the leadership of the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) in cooperation with the American National Metric Council, the United States Metric Board, and the National Bureau of Standards. The purpose of the Symposium is for the U.S. construction community: "To examine opportunities and problems relating to the metric system of measurement in construction and to consider a procedure for developing consensus on whether or not the construction community should convert, and, if so, when." This report is designed to assist attendees by providing background information on the status of metric conversion in the United States and to provide a general understanding of the key aspects of metrication for the construction community. It was assembled from material provided by the U.S. construction community and technical data developed by the Center for Building Technology at the National Bureau of Standards. It is intended to present pertinent data and an analysis of the principal issues faced by the construction community . It is recognized that all of the content will not be of interest to many readers. Therefore the information has been carefully broken up and headlined so that the table of contents provides a guide to selective reading. The report was requested by the NIBS Metric Symposium Planning Committee which is comprised of representatives of the four organizations mentioned above. The material presented does not represent the formal position of any organization or individual , except where so indicated. Special thanks are extended to the principal authors of this report, Hans J. Milton, FRAIA, Technical Consultant, and Sandra A. Berry of the National Bureau of Sandards . Mr. Milton's services on metrication and dimensional coordination v/ere made available by the Australian Government with the support of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development James G. Gross, Chief Building Economics and Regulatory Technology Division Center for Building Technology National Engineering Laboratory National Bureau of Standards iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Constructive comments on an earlier draft of this document were received from: David S. Miller Chairman, Metric Symposium Planning Committee, National Institute of Building Sciences Louis Barbrow National Bureau of Standards A. Charles Danner U.S. Metric Board David Gorin American National Metric Council Charlene F. Sizemore Board of Directors, National Institute of Building Sciences Thomas C. Tufts Chairman, Construction Industries Coordinating Committee, American National Metric Council The authors express appreciation to Ms. Ulesia Gray, Center for Building Technology Word Processing Center, for her assistance in preparing this document for publication in a very short time frame. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PART 1 - METRIC CONVERSION DELIBERATIONS AND PLANNING FOR THE CHANGE 1.1 Historical Background 1 1.2 The U.S. Metric Study and Testimony from the Construction
Recommended publications
  • DOCUMENT RESUME ED 119 998 an Act to Declare a National Policy
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 119 998 SE 020 412 TITLE An Act to Declare a National Policy of Coordinating the Increasing Use of the Metric System in the United States, and to Establish a United States Metric Board to Coordinate the Voluntary Conversion to the Metric System. Public Law 94-168, Ninety-Fourth Congress, H. R. 8674, December 23, 1975. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. House. PUB DATE 23 Dec 75 NOTE 7p.; Not availalbe in hard copy due to small print EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 Plus Postage. HC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Curriculum; Elementary Secondary Education; *Federal Legislation; *Mathematics Education; *Measurement; *Metric System; *Public Education; Vocabulary IDENTIFIERS Congressional Record; *Metric Conversion Act 1975 ABSTRACT The Metric Conversion Act of 1975 was passed on December 23, 1975; the act is printed in full in this document, which is excerpted from the Congressional Record. The act provides for the establishment of a 17-member Metric Board, and charges the board with responsibility for devising and executing a program of planning, coordination, and public education. Specifically, the board is to consult with representatives of industries, agencies, and interest groups which are concerned with metrication; plan, facilitate, and publicize conversion programs; and consult with international organizations concerning recognition of United States metric standards. In the area of education the board is obliged to conduct public information programs, and consult with governmental agencies concerned with education to insure that the metric system is included in the curriculum. The board is also charged with conducting periodic research concerning the effectiveness of conversi,,ni (SD) *********************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished * materials not available from other sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Da Ferraris a Giorgi: La Scuola Italiana Di Elettrotecnica
    Da Ferraris a Giorgi: la scuola italiana di Elettrotecnica ADRIANO PAOLO MORANDO Da Ferraris a Giorgi: la scuola italiana di Elettrotecnica Implicita nella Dynamical collocano in modo preciso, facendone Philosophy e nella espansione di una il continuatore, nel solco dell’opera rivoluzione industriale in atto, la nasci- ferrarisiana. Il primo, The foundations ta dell’ingegneria elettrica scientifica si of Electrical Science, del 1894, riporta articolò, postmaxwellianamente, nella a quell’approccio operativo di progressiva transizione dalla figura del- Bridgman che avrebbe in seguito in- lo scienziato (Maxwell), a quella dello fluenzato la lettura di Ercole Bottani. Il scienziato-inventore (Ferraris), a quel- secondo, del 1905, è legato alla Teoria la, infine, del fisico matematico che di- della dinamo ricorsiva, con la quale venta ingegnere (Steinmetz). egli, sulla scia di alcuni contributi Sottolineato lo stretto legame che, ferrarisiani ed anticipando la trasformata sul piano metodologico e fondazionale, di Park, propose un primo approccio correlò la Dynamical Theory maxwel- elettrodinamico alla teoria unificata del- liana ai contributi recati da Galileo le macchine elettriche. Ferraris alla teoria scientifica del trasfor- Prendendo le mosse da questi ele- matore e all’invenzione del campo ro- menti, verranno ravvisati, lungo il per- tante, si colloca, nel quadro della cultu- corso Mossotti, Codazza, Ferraris, ra e della società del tempo, la figura Ascoli-Arnò e Giorgi-Lori, gli elemen- dello scienziato italiano. Ne emerge, tra- ti portanti della scuola italiana di mite il suo maestro Giovanni Codazza, elettrotecnica. il ruolo decisivo che sulla sua forma- zione ebbero - oltre a Maxwell, Tait, von L’astuzia scozzese: la dynamical Helmholtz ed Heaviside - il maestro di philosophy questi: Fabrizio Ottaviano Mossotti.
    [Show full text]
  • The Electrical Connection François Piquemal Tells the Story of the Ampere, Which Bridges Mechanical and Electromagnetic Units
    measure for measure The electrical connection François Piquemal tells the story of the ampere, which bridges mechanical and electromagnetic units. n everyday electrical life, watt and volt In reality, international standards remained crucial role in the planned redefinition of the probably mean more than ampere: when at home and metrological institutes used ampere (and the kilogram)5,6. Ireplacing a lamp, you need the right secondary, transportable standards. History seems to repeat itself. Like wattage, when changing a battery, voltage Dissatisfaction about expressing the past schism between the practical is what you check. A quick explanation of electrical quantities in a limited 3D system international electrical units and the the ‘amp’ is that a current of 1 A generates of (mechanical) units soon became a CGS system, the conventional (quantum- a power of 1 W in a conducting element to critical issue. In 1901, Giovanni Giorgi had standard) ohm and volt — in use since which a voltage of 1 V is applied. demonstrated the possibility of designing one 1990 and based on defined values of KJ and This definition is equivalent to the one coherent 4D system by linking the MKS units RK (ref. 5) — are not embedded in the SI. approved during the first International with the practical electrical system via a Fortunately, progress in metrology is being Exposition of Electricity held in Paris in single base electrical unit from which all made, and a revision of the SI, solving this 1881: the ampere is the current produced by others could be derived. After some debates, and other issues, is planned for 2018 (ref.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME BD 090 028 SE 017 598 TITLE Metric
    DOCUMENT RESUME BD 090 028 SE 017 598 TITLE Metric Conversion Act of 1973. Hearing Before the Committee on Commerce, United States Senate, 93rd Congress, First Session on S. 100. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. Senate Committee on Commerce. PUB DATE 2 Nov 73 NOTE 94p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 HC-$4.20 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTCRS *Economic Factors; *Federal Legislation; Government Publications; Mathematics Education; *Measurement; *Metric System; Reference Materials; Standards ABSTRACT The complete text of the Senate till to make the metric system the predominate system of measurement in the U.S. is given. Next follows testimony of witnesses: Senators, governmental agencies, representatives of labor unions and industries and the director of the National Bureau of Standards. Also included are some letters from other interested sources, including several educators. (LS) METRIC CONVERSION ACT OF 1973 U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, CC) EDUCATION A WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF C\I EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN NEPRO CD DUCED E.H'TLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSONONORGANIZATION ORIGIN C:::) ATiNG IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NFCESSARILY REPRE a- HEARING SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CD BEFORE THE EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE UNITED STATES SENATE NINETY-THIRD CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON S. 100 TO PROVIDE A NATIONAL PROGRAM IN ORDER TO MAKE THE INTERNATIONAL METRIC SYSTEM THE PREDOMI- NANT BUT NOT EXCLUSIVE SYSTEM OF MEASUREMENT IN THE UNITED STATES AND TO PROVIDE FOR CONVERT- ING TO THE GENERAL USE OF SUCH SYSTEM WITHIN TEN YEARS NOVEMBER 2, 1973 Serial No. 93-50 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurements” - Then and Now’
    ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print): 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (A High Impact Factor & UGC Approved Journal) Website: www.ijirset.com Vol. 6, Issue 9, September 2017 “Measurements” - Then and Now’ Dr.(Prof.) V.C.A. NAIR* Educational Physicist, Research Guide for Physics at JJT University, Rajasthan, India. ABSTRACT: The paper begins with a philosophical approach to measurements. Various types of measurements in the past and present are extensively dealt with. Different systems of units with more stress on the System International Units. Definitions ofunits in the SI.Supplementary units and derived units. A brief account of Error, Accuracy, Precision and Uncertainty. There is a chronicle of measurements and discoveries during the last two centuries. The paper is exhaustive and the author has covered almost all aspects of ‘measurements’ and the reader will (I hope) find it more a treatise than a simple treatment. More additions are due to the vast experience in teaching Applied Physics of the author. The paper ends with a Conclusion KEYWORDS: Accuracy, Base units, Cesium Clock, Counting, Customary units, Derived units, Elephant Water Clock, Large Hadron Collider, Macroscopic and Microscopic Measurements, Precision, SI Units, Supplementary Units, Systems of Units, Uncertainty. I. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Philosophy of Measurement: “Measurement” is a noun the dictionary meaning of which is “Actofmeasuring”, that is measuringany physical quantity or any other thing. Physics could be distinguished from other sciences by the part played by it in measurement. Other sciences measure some of the properties which they investigate but it is generally recognized that when they make such measurements, they are always depending directly or indirectly on the results of Physics.
    [Show full text]
  • EQUATIONS for MAGNETIC INDUCTION (B) Maxwell Notes That the Following Equation for the H Field
    AN OVERVIEW OF MAXWELL’S TREATISE (3rd Edition, 1891) Arthur D. Yaghjian Concord, MA USA Annual EM Contractor’s Review, January 2015 UNESCO “International Year of Light” QUESTIONS • What free-space fields did Maxwell take as primary: E and H or E and B? • How did Maxwell obtain fields and eqs. in source regions? • Did he begin with the integral or the differential equations? • Did he use vectors and vector eqs. or just scalar eqs.? • Did he express his eqs. in the same way that we do today? • Did he average microscopic fields to get macroscopic fields. • Did he write Faraday’s law explicitly? • Did he derive the Lorentz force in his treatise? ∆ • Did he always use the Coulomb gauge ( . A = 0)? • How did he determine the speed of light? PHOTOS OF MAXWELL Professor at Student at King’s College Cambridge (Wrote Dynamical 24 Theory … paper) (early 30s) Writing Later Treatise Years 38 (Died at 48) SYNOPSIS OF MAXWELL’S LIFE • Born of Scottish parents in Edinburgh (1831). • Extremely precocious child who wanted to know how everything “doos”. • Mother died when he was just 8 years old. • Father gave him best education available in humanities, sciences, and mathematics. • Stuttered as a child and made fun of by other students. • Wrote poetry as a child and for the rest of his life. • He grew to a height of 64.5 inches (165 cm). • At 14 years old he published a paper on oval curves in the Royal Society of Edinburgh. • Studied at Edinburgh and then Cambridge University. • “My plan is to let nothing be left willfully unexamined”.
    [Show full text]
  • Voluntary Metric Labeling Will Be Implemented: Concerns and Benefits
    DECEMBER 2009 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 THE METRIC SYSTEM IS THE PREFERRED MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR TRADE AND COMMERCE IN THE UNITED STATES AND AROUND THE WORLD he United States adopted the metric system1 for use in trade and commerce in 1866. In 1975 Congress adopted the Metric Conversion Act declaring that the transition to the metric system would be T voluntary. In 1988 Congress declared that the metric system was the preferred system of measurement for trade and commerce for this country but it failed to eliminate all of the legal barriers to its use. In 1992 Congress amended the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA) to require metric units on packaged goods so consumers would become familiar with those quantities. Under the current FPLA,2 the net quantity of contents declarations on packages of consumer goods must include both inch‐pound and metric units (“dual‐units” labeling). The purpose of the proposed amendment to FPLA that is shown below is to give packagers the option of displaying only metric units in the net quantity of contents statements on packages. The proposal includes a provision to allow the Secretary of Commerce to provide national coordination of industry conversion on a sector by sector basis to ensure uniformity. The proposal would allow packagers to continue to also display inch‐pound units on packages indefinitely. Prior to 1992, the FPLA required a declaration of quantity to be in inch‐pound units as a dual quantity statement. This meant that a package had to include both ounces and the largest whole unit (e.g., 32 ounces [2 lb]) in the net quantity statement, and ounces had to be primary or listed first.
    [Show full text]
  • Giovanni Giorgi E La Tradizione Dell'elettrotecnica Italiana
    GIOVANNI GIORGI E LA TRADIZIONE DELL’ELETTROTECNICA ITALIANA ARCANGELO ROSSI,* SALVO D’AGOSTINO, ADRIANO PAOLO MORANDO** * Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Lecce ** Dipartimento di Elettrotecnica, Politecnico di Milano. La presente ricerca ha come obiettivo lo studio dell’opera degli elettromagnetici italiani da Galileo Ferraris fino a Ercole Bottani ed è inquadrabile nella più ampia tematica relativa alla nascita in senso post- maxwelliano della moderna ingegneria elettrotecnica. La nostra ricerca si articola nelle seguenti fasi : Un'analisi preliminare della transizione dall’elettromagnetismo teorico a quello tecnico e viceversa e della corrispondente nascita della moderna ingegneria elettrotecnica. Tale studio è stato iniziato e sarà condotto in termini comparativi: ravvisato nel sodalizio C.P. Steinmetz – E.J. Berg, e quindi nella General Electric di Edison, il momento della consapevole e voluta transizione dalla fisica matematica all’ingegneria elettrica, si approfondiscono, sottolineandone il legame con l’approccio strettamente operativo della scuola di fisica tecnologica pisana (Pacinotti), le figure italiane di quel tempo. Ne fa parte essenziale un approfondimento della figura di Galileo Ferraris, rivisitata nel suo “anomalo” percorso formativo (Maxwell, Kelvin, Tait, Heaviside) e riguardata come primo esempio di fisico matematico- ingegnere elettrico italiano.1 Seguirà un'analisi della “mancata” evoluzione italiana, colta nei suoi rapporti con l’economia, la cultura, la scienza e la tecnica dell’Italia umbertina. Nel dopo Ferraris, con Ascoli, Arnò, Donati, Grassi, Sartori, l’ingegneria elettrica italiana, chiusa nel suo particulare, torna ad essere fisica matematica che non accetta di diventare ingegneria. E' qui che si inserisce la figura centrale di Giovanni Giorgi: discepolo, attraverso l’Ascoli che ne fu allievo, di Ferraris.
    [Show full text]
  • The Daniell Cell, Ohm's Law and the Emergence of the International System of Units
    The Daniell Cell, Ohm’s Law and the Emergence of the International System of Units Joel S. Jayson∗ Brooklyn, NY (Dated: December 24, 2015) Telegraphy originated in the 1830s and 40s and flourished in the following decades, but with a patchwork of electrical standards. Electromotive force was for the most part measured in units of the predominant Daniell cell. Each company had their own resistance standard. In 1862 the British Association for the Advancement of Science formed a committee to address this situation. By 1873 they had given definition to the electromagnetic system of units (emu) and defined the practical units of the ohm as 109 emu units of resistance and the volt as 108 emu units of electromotive force. These recommendations were ratified and expanded upon in a series of international congresses held between 1881 and 1904. A proposal by Giovanni Giorgi in 1901 took advantage of a coincidence between the conversion of the units of energy in the emu system (the erg) and in the practical system (the joule) in that the same conversion factor existed between the cgs based emu system and a theretofore undefined MKS system. By introducing another unit, X (where X could be any of the practical electrical units), Giorgi demonstrated that a self consistent MKSX system was tenable without the need for multiplying factors. Ultimately the ampere was selected as the fourth unit. It took nearly 60 years, but in 1960 Giorgi’s proposal was incorporated as the core of the newly inaugurated International System of Units (SI). This article surveys the physics, physicists and events that contributed to those developments.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries' Theories Of
    Advances in Historical Studies, 2016, 5, 1-11 Published Online March 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ahs http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ahs.2016.51001 An Overview of the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries’ Theories of Light, Ether, and Electromagnetic Waves Salvo D’Agostino Università “Sapienza”, Rome, Italy Received 13 January 2016; accepted 13 February 2016; published 16 February 2016 Copyright © 2016 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Johannes Kepler, the seventeenth century celebrated astronomer, considered vision as the effect of its alleged cause—the Lumen. Since many centuries, scientists and philosophers of Light were especially interested in theories and experiments on the cause-effect relationship between our vi- sion and its alleged cause. But the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries’ contributions of Helmholtz, Maxwell, Hertz, and Lorentz, proved that Light was an electromagnetic wavelike phenomenon, which propagated trough space or ether by an exceptionally high velocity. In my paper I analyze some of the reasons that might justify the controversies among the major experts in Physics and Electrodynamics. In 1905 Albert Einstein found that abolishing Ether would remarkably improve his new Special Relativity theory, and Maxwell’s and Hertz’s Electrodynamics. His theory was ac- cepted by a large majority of physicists, Max Planck included, but he also found a ten-year silence on the side of Poincaré, and moderate oppositions from Lorentz, the great expert in classical Elec- trodynamics. Keywords Einstein, Maxwell, Helmholtz, Hertz, Lorentz, Velocity of Light 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Giovanni Giorgi Mathematical Tools for Microwave Mammography And
    UNIVERSITA` DEGLI STUDI DI GENOVA - ITALY PH.D. IN MATHEMATICS AND APPLICATIONS xxiv cycle Giovanni Giorgi Mathematical tools for microwave mammography and prostate cryosurgery Advisors Prof. Michele Piana Prof. Houssem Haddar Dipartimento di Matematica Centre de Mathmatique Appliques Universit`adi Genova, Italia Ecole Polytechnique, Francia To my uncle Sandro, mathematician of plants and gardens IV Contents Preface IX Introduction XI 1 Breast and prostate cancer 1 1.1 Some generalities on cancer . 2 1.2 Breast cancer . 3 1.3 Prostate cancer . 5 2 The mathematics of microwave tomography and cryosurgery 7 2.1 Microwave tomography . 9 2.1.1 The direct scattering problem . 10 2.1.2 Numerical techniques for the direct scattering problem . 14 2.1.3 The inverse scattering problem . 17 2.2 Cryosurgery . 20 2.2.1 The cryosurgery operation . 20 2.2.2 Heat propagation with phase change: from pure substances to biological tissues . 21 2.2.3 An enthalpy-based approach to the Stefan problem in biological (cancer- ous) tissues . 23 2.2.4 The planning of a cryosurgery operation . 26 3 The linear sampling method as a qualitative approach in microwave tomography 29 3.1 The linear sampling method and microwave mammography . 30 3.1.1 Principles of the linear sampling method . 30 3.1.2 The method and its implementation . 31 3.1.3 The LSM in inhomogeneous backgrounds . 33 3.1.4 The no-sampling formulation of the LSM . 35 3.1.5 Application to breast cancer detection by microwave . 36 VI CONTENTS 3.1.6 Conclusions . 38 3.2 On the theoretical basis of the linear sampling method: a physical interpretation 42 3.2.1 The scattering problem and the LSM .
    [Show full text]
  • Page 595 TITLE 15—COMMERCE and TRADE § 201 Employees, Etc., of Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Sec
    Page 595 TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE § 201 employees, etc., of Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Sec. Commerce on duty abroad or away from duty post. 232. Barrels below standard; marking. 233. Penalty for violations. § 197f. Repealed. Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title XI, 234. Standard barrel for fruits or other dry com- § 1131(54), 60 Stat. 1039 modity. 235. Sale or shipment of barrel of less capacity Section, act Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 365, § 7, 44 Stat. 1396, re- than standard; punishment. lated to availability of appropriation during fiscal year 236. Variations from standard permitted; prosecu- ending June 30, 1926, and thereafter for the Department tions; law not applicable to certain barrels. of Commerce for commercial attache´s in Europe, South 237. Standard barrels for lime. or Central America and elsewhere. 238. Penalty for selling in barrels not marked. 239. Sale in containers of less capacity than bar- EFFECTIVE DATE OF REPEAL rel. Repeal effective three months from Aug. 13, 1946, see 240. Rules and regulations. section 1141 of act Aug. 13, 1946. 241. Penalty for selling lime in unmarked barrels and containers. § 198. Repealed. Oct. 10, 1940, ch. 851, § 4, 54 Stat. 242. Duty of United States attorney to enforce 1111 law. Section, acts Jan. 25, 1929, ch. 102, title III, 45 Stat. SUBCHAPTER VII—STANDARD BASKETS AND 1119; Apr. 18, 1930, ch. 184, title III, 46 Stat. 198; Feb. 23, CONTAINERS 1931, ch. 280, title III, 46 Stat. 1334; July 1, 1932, ch. 361, 251 to 256. Repealed. title III, 47 Stat. 502; Mar. 1, 1933, ch.
    [Show full text]