A Journey Through Austronesian and Papuan Linguistic and Cultural Space Papers in Honour of Andrew Pawley
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
List of Project Muse's Journals Through E-Shodhsindhu URL –
List of Project Muse’s Journals through e-Shodhsindhu URL – http://muse.jhu.edu 1. a/b: Auto/Biography Studies 2. Éire-Ireland 3. Ab Imperio 4. Acadiensis: Journal of the History of the Atlantic Region / Revue d’histoire de la region atlantique 5. Advertising & Society Review 6. Africa Today 7. Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute 8. African American Review 9. African Arts 10. African Conflict & Peacebuilding Review 11. African Economic History 12. African Studies Review 13. Alabama Review 14. Al-Ê¿Arabiyya: Journal of the American Association of Teachers of Arabic 15. Aleph: Historical Studies in Science and Judaism 16. American Annals of the Deaf 17. American Book Review 18. American Catholic Studies 19. American Imago 20. American Jewish History 21. American Journal of Mathematics 22. American Journal of Philology 23. American Journal of Theology & Philosophy 24. American Literary History 25. American Literary Realism 26. American Literary Scholarship 27. American Literature 28. American Music 29. American Periodicals: A Journal of History & Criticism 30. American Quarterly 31. American Speech 32. American Studies 33. An Sionnach: A Journal of Literature, Culture, and the Arts 34. Anales Galdosianos 35. Annales. Histoire, Sciences sociales (French Edition) 36. Anthropologica 37. Anthropological Linguistics 38. Anthropological Quarterly 39. Antiphon: A Journal for Liturgical Renewal 40. Appalachian Heritage 41. Archives of Asian Art 42. Arctic Anthropology 43. Arethusa 44. ariel: A Review of International English Literature 45. Arizona Journal of Hispanic Cultural Studies 46. Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory 47. Arthuriana 48. ASAP/Journal 49. ASEAN Economic Bulletin 50. -
Journals Asian Studies
MODERN CHINESE JOURNALS LITERATURE Acta Koreana CINEMA & ISLAM Harvard Journal of Asiatic Archives of Asian Art Studies ASEAN RELATIONS Asia Policy Hawaiian Journal of History VIETNAM WAR Asian Music Indonesia Asian Perspective Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop What’s Your Culture Asian Perspectives PROJECT? Journal of Asian American ASIAN Asian Theatre Journal Studies STUDIES Azalea: Journal of Korean Journal of Buddhist Literature & Culture Philosophy China: An International Journal of Burma Studies SHINTO RELIGION Journal Journal of Chinese Literature GOLEK THEATER China Review and Culture PAN-ASIANISM China Review International Journal of Chinese Religions CHINOPERL: Journal of Journal of Daoist Studies K-POP Chinese Oral and Performing Literature Journal of Japanese Philosophy SOUTHEAST ASIAN The Contemporary Pacific MYTHOLOGY The Journal of Japanese Contemporary Southeast Studies RELIGION IN Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic SOUTH ASIAN ART Affairs MODERN CHINESE LITERATURE Journal of Korean Religions Review of Japanese Culture and Society CINEMA & ISLAM Journal of Korean Studies Seoul Journal of Korean ASEAN RELATIONS Journal of Song-Yuan Studies Studies Journal of South Asian and Sojourn: Journal of Social VIETNAM WAR Middle Eastern Studies Issues in Southeast Asia Journal of Southeast Asian Southeast Asian Affairs What’s Your Economies (JSEAE) Southeast of Now: PROJECT? Journal of the Malaysian Directions in Contemporary Branch of the Royal Asiatic and Modern Art in Asia ASIAN Society Sungkyun Journal of East STUDIES Korean -
Helicobacter Pylori in the Indonesian Malay's Descendants Might Be
Syam et al. Gut Pathog (2021) 13:36 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-021-00432-6 Gut Pathogens RESEARCH Open Access Helicobacter pylori in the Indonesian Malay’s descendants might be imported from other ethnicities Ari Fahrial Syam1†, Langgeng Agung Waskito2,3†, Yudith Annisa Ayu Rezkitha3,4, Rentha Monica Simamora5, Fauzi Yusuf6, Kanserina Esthera Danchi7, Ahmad Fuad Bakry8, Arnelis9, Erwin Mulya10, Gontar Alamsyah Siregar11, Titong Sugihartono12, Hasan Maulahela1, Dalla Doohan2, Muhammad Miftahussurur3,12* and Yoshio Yamaoka13,14* Abstract Background: Even though the incidence of H. pylori infection among Malays in the Malay Peninsula is low, we observed a high H. pylori prevalence in Sumatra, which is the main residence of Indonesian Malays. H. pylori preva- lence among Indonesian Malay descendants was investigated. Results: Using a combination of fve tests, 232 recruited participants were tested for H- pylori and participants were considered positive if at least one test positive. The results showed that the overall H. pylori prevalence was 17.2%. Participants were then categorized into Malay (Aceh, Malay, and Minang), Java (Javanese and Sundanese), Nias, and Bataknese groups. The prevalence of H. pylori was very low among the Malay group (2.8%) and no H. pylori was observed among the Aceh. Similarly, no H. pylori was observed among the Java group. However, the prevalence of H. pylori was high among the Bataknese (52.2%) and moderate among the Nias (6.1%). Multilocus sequence typing showed that H. pylori in Indonesian Malays classifed as hpEastAsia with a subpopulation of hspMaori, suggesting that the isolated H. pylori were not a specifc Malays H. -
Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects of Valency-Reducing Devices in Oceanic Languages
2016 LINGUA POSNANIENSIS LVIII (2) DoI 10.1515/linpo-2016-0013 Synchronic and diachronic aspects of valency-reducing devices in Oceanic languages Katarzyna Janic Department of Comparative Linguistics, University of zurich e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Katarzyna Janic. Synchronic and diachronic aspects of valency-reducing devices in Oceanic langu- ages. the poznań Society for the advancement of arts and Sciences, pL ISSn 0079-4740, pp. 151-188 this paper sketches out valency-reducing devices available in oceanic languages. the proto-oceanic prefix *paRi- and suffix *-akin[i] are specifically the focus of the discussion, being approached from both synchro- nic and diachronic perspectives. I explain the currently attested functions performed by the reflexes of these two morphemes by assuming that the evolution went in a particular direction: from a very general function to a more specialized, concrete one. among different functions performed by the reflexes of *paRi- and *-akin[i] within the valency-reducing domain, I will show that the antipassive has not been fully recognized and properly designated in linguistic descriptions of the oceanic languages yet. Keywords: oceanic languages, valency, plurality of relations, detransitivization, antipassive 1. Introduction the question of valency and valency-changing devices in oceanic languages has been extensively discussed in the literature (ozanne-Rivierre 1976; Moyse-Faurie 1983, 2007, 2008, 2016, 2017; Schlie 1983; Lichtenberk 1985, 1991, 2000, 2007, 2008: 54-163; Schütz 1985; Dixon 1988: 45-51; Mosel & hovdhaugen 1992: 693-774, 720-741; B. Ev- ans 2003: 301-309; Davis 2003: 110-178; Bril 2005; naess 2013; among many others). While some of the scholars have investigated it diachronically with the aim to reconstruct these devices within the proto-oceanic system (harrison 1982; B. -
Proto-Micronesian Reconstructions—1
Proto-Micronesian Reconstructions—1 Byron W. Bender, Ward H. Goodenough, Frederick H. Jackson, Jeffrey C. Marck, Kenneth L. Rehg, Ho-min Sohn, Stephen Trussel, and Judith W. Wang1 university of hawai‘i and university of pennsylvania Part 1 presents some 980 reconstructions for Proto-Micronesian, Proto–Central Micronesian, and Proto–Western Micronesian. Part 2 (to appear in volume 42 [2]) gives reconstructions for two additional subgroups within Proto-Micronesian: Proto-Pohnpeic and Proto-Chuukic, and their immediate ancestor, Proto– Pohnpeic-Chuukic. A handful of putative loans are also identi²ed, and a single English ²nder list is provided for all of the reconstructions. INTRODUCTION. Lexical data for a number of Micronesian languages began to be collected systematically in the mid-1960s as part of the development of language lessons for the U.S. Peace Corps and in connection with other Micronesian language projects that followed at the University of Hawai‘i. These data were stored on a main- frame computer using programs then being developed (Hsu and Peters 1984), and eventually dictionaries were published for a number of the languages included in this study (Elbert 1972, Abo et al. 1976, Lee 1976, Sohn and Tawerilmang 1976, Harrison and Albert 1977, Jensen 1977, Rehg and Sohl 1979, Goodenough and Sugita 1980, Jackson and Mark 1991). Comparative work using these data began with Marck 1977, focusing on the group of languages referred to as Nuclear Micronesian. In the next several years, the authors of the current study put the initial data on computer and sub- stantially added to them by directly eliciting information from speakers of Microne- sian languages who were students in the Bilingual Education Project for Micronesia at the University of Hawai‘i. -
THE INDO-EUROPEAN FAMILY — the LINGUISTIC EVIDENCE by Brian D
THE INDO-EUROPEAN FAMILY — THE LINGUISTIC EVIDENCE by Brian D. Joseph, The Ohio State University 0. Introduction A stunning result of linguistic research in the 19th century was the recognition that some languages show correspondences of form that cannot be due to chance convergences, to borrowing among the languages involved, or to universal characteristics of human language, and that such correspondences therefore can only be the result of the languages in question having sprung from a common source language in the past. Such languages are said to be “related” (more specifically, “genetically related”, though “genetic” here does not have any connection to the term referring to a biological genetic relationship) and to belong to a “language family”. It can therefore be convenient to model such linguistic genetic relationships via a “family tree”, showing the genealogy of the languages claimed to be related. For example, in the model below, all the languages B through I in the tree are related as members of the same family; if they were not related, they would not all descend from the same original language A. In such a schema, A is the “proto-language”, the starting point for the family, and B, C, and D are “offspring” (often referred to as “daughter languages”); B, C, and D are thus “siblings” (often referred to as “sister languages”), and each represents a separate “branch” of the family tree. B and C, in turn, are starting points for other offspring languages, E, F, and G, and H and I, respectively. Thus B stands in the same relationship to E, F, and G as A does to B, C, and D. -
LING 185 the Syntax of Austronesian Languages Preliminary Syllabus
LING 185 The Syntax of Austronesian Languages Preliminary syllabus The goal of this class is to provide an introduction into comparative Austronesian syntax by discussing the most pertinent issues of Austronesian languages that have posed challenge to current syntactic theory and suggesting further readings and topics for discussion. The choice of the Austronesian language family as the focus of this class is not accidental. The Austronesian language family—roughly 1,200 genetically related languages dispersed over an area encompassing Madagascar, Taiwan, Southeast Asia, and islands of the Pacific—is often called the largest language family in the world. But it has been relatively little studied. Sophisticated research on the grammar of Austronesian languages did not really begin until the 1930’s and 1940’s (fueled, in part, by military interest in the Pacific region). Although there was a surge of interest in Austronesian in the 1970’s and—even more dramatically—in the 1990’s, the number of theoretical linguists working on these languages has remained small. Nonetheless, Austronesian languages have a significant contribution to make to linguistic theory, given the number of typologically unusual properties they exhibit (including the less common and poorly understood verb‐first word order, ergativity, and wh‐ agreement). If these languages were as well‐understood as, say, the Romance languages are today, syntactic theory could well be dramatically different. The following list illustrates just some of the intriguing features whose theoretical significance—already evident—will surely deepen when they are investigated from a comparative perspective: • Many Austronesian languages exhibit the uncommon word orders verb‐subject‐object (VSO) or verb‐object‐subject (VOS). -
The Polynesian Case
Lexicostatistics Compared with Shared Innovations: the Polynesian Case jK=dÉääJj~ååI=fK=mÉáêçëI=pK=pí~êçëíáå Santa Fe Institute The Polynesian languages, together with Fijian and Rotuman, consti- tute the Central Oceanic branch, which is usually included in a bigger Oceanic family, part of Austronesian. The Polynesian language family consists of 28 languages ([BIGGS 98]) most of which are fairly well known. The history of the family is also well investigated: we have the phonological reconstruction of its protolan- guage ([BIGGS 98], [MARCK 2000]), suggestions about morphology and syntax ([WILSON 982]; [CLARK 96]), and a detailed comparative diction- ary of the family — probably one of the best etymological dictionaries for languages outside Eurasia ([BIGGS n.d.]) The Proto-Polynesian consonantal system is reconstructed as ([BIGGS 98: 08–09]): *p *m *f *w *t *n *s *l *r *k *ŋ (*h) `*ʔ Using the principle of «irreversible changes», one can see that the systems of daughter languages could be derived from Proto-Polynesian through a sequence of simple innovations (mostly mergers): . Proto-Tongan: *p *m *f *w *t *n *s > *h *l *r > *k *ŋ *h *ʔ .. Tongan p m f w t n h l k ŋ ʔ 2. Proto-Nuclear Polynesian: *p *m *f *w *t *n *s *l = *r *k *ŋ *h > * GÉää-M~åå, PÉáêçë, S. Sí~êçëíáå. Lexicostatistics & Shared Innovations . 2. Samoa p m f w t n s l *k > ʔ ŋ 2.2. East Polynesian *p *m *f *w *t *n *s > *h *l *k *ŋ * 2..3. Tahitian p m f v t n h r *k > ʔ *ŋ > ʔ 2. -
From Paradise Lost to Promised Land: Christianity and the Rise of West
School of History & Politics & Centre for Asia Pacific Social Transformation Studies (CAPSTRANS) University of Wollongong From Paradise Lost to Promised Land Christianity and the Rise of West Papuan Nationalism Susanna Grazia Rizzo A Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) of the University of Wollongong 2004 “Religion (…) constitutes the universal horizon and foundation of the nation’s existence. It is in terms of religion that a nation defines what it considers to be true”. G. W. F. Hegel, Lectures on the of Philosophy of World History. Abstract In 1953 Aarne Koskinen’s book, The Missionary Influence as a Political Factor in the Pacific Islands, appeared on the shelves of the academic world, adding further fuel to the longstanding debate in anthropological and historical studies regarding the role and effects of missionary activity in colonial settings. Koskinen’s finding supported the general view amongst anthropologists and historians that missionary activity had a negative impact on non-Western populations, wiping away their cultural templates and disrupting their socio-economic and political systems. This attitude towards mission activity assumes that the contemporary non-Western world is the product of the ‘West’, and that what the ‘Rest’ believes and how it lives, its social, economic and political systems, as well as its values and beliefs, have derived from or have been implanted by the ‘West’. This postulate has led to the denial of the agency of non-Western or colonial people, deeming them as ‘history-less’ and ‘nation-less’: as an entity devoid of identity. But is this postulate true? Have the non-Western populations really been passive recipients of Western commodities, ideas and values? This dissertation examines the role that Christianity, the ideology of the West, the religion whose values underlies the semantics and structures of modernisation, has played in the genesis and rise of West Papuan nationalism. -
The Geography and History of *R-Loss in Southern Oceanic Languages Alexandre François
Where *R they all? The Geography and History of *R-loss in Southern Oceanic Languages Alexandre François To cite this version: Alexandre François. Where *R they all? The Geography and History of *R-loss in Southern Oceanic Languages. Oceanic Linguistics, University of Hawai’i Press, 2011, 50 (1), pp.140 - 197. 10.1353/ol.2011.0009. hal-01137686 HAL Id: hal-01137686 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01137686 Submitted on 17 Oct 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Where *R they all? The Geography and History of *R-loss in Southern Oceanic Languages Alexandre François LANGUES ET CIVILISATIONS À TRADITION ORALE (CNRS), PARIS, AND AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Some twenty years ago, Paul Geraghty offered a large-scale survey of the retention and loss of Proto-Oceanic *R across Eastern Oceanic languages, and concluded that *R was “lost in proportion to distance from Western Oceanic.” This paper aims at testing Geraghty’s hypothesis based on a larger body of data now available, with a primary focus on a tightly knit set of languages spoken in Vanuatu. By observing the dialectology of individual lexical items in this region, I show that the boundaries between languages retaining vs. -
Reflexives Markers in Oceanic Languages
DGfS-CNRS Summer School: Linguistic Typology (3) Koenig/Moyse-Faurie Reflexives markers in Oceanic Languages Ekkehard König (FU Berlin) & Claire Moyse-Faurie (Lacito-CNRS) 1. Previous views 1.1. A lack of reflexive markers ? “[Oceanic languages] have morphological markers used to encode reciprocal and certain other situations, but not reflexive situations” (Lichtenberk, 2000:31). “Assuming that reflexivity is inherently related to transitivity, we understand why we do not find morphosyntactic reflexivisation in Samoan: Samoan does not have syntactically transitive clauses” (Mosel, 1991: ‘Where have all the Samoan reflexives gone?’) “There is no mark of reflexive, either in the form of a reflexive pronoun or of a reflexive marker on the verb – one simply says I saw me” (Dixon, 1988:9). Out of context, there are indeed many cases of ambiguity with 3rd persons, due to the frequent absence of obligatory grammaticalized constructions to express reflexivity: XÂRÂGURÈ (South of the Mainland, New Caledonia) (1) nyî xati nyî 3SG scold 3SG ‘He is scolding him/himself.’ NUMÈÈ (Far South of the Mainland, New Caledonia) (2) treâ trooke nê kwè nê ART.PL dog 3PL bite 3PL ‘The dogs are biting them/each other.’ MWOTLAP (North Central Vanuatu) (3) Kēy mu-wuh mat kēy 3PL PERF-hit die 3PL ‘They killed each other/themselves.’ (François, 2001:372) TOQABAQITA (South East Solomon) (4) Keero’a keko thathami keero’a 3DU 3DU like 3DU ‘They liked them/each other/themselves.’ (Lichtenberk, 1991:172) 1.2. Confusion between middle markers and reflexive markers “In East Futunan, the reflexive meaning is either lexicalised (i.e. expressed by lexically reflexive verbs) or by transitive verbs, the two arguments of which refer to the same entity. -
Ancestry Class 7 Is Typical of Population Surui from South America (Speaking a Monde Language of the Family Tupi)
Creole Tupi Arawakan Uto-Aztecan Mayan Sepik South-Bougainville Andamanese Hmong-Mien Austro-Asiatic Tai-Kadai Austronesian Burushaski Basque Sino-Tibetan North-Caucasian Japonic Korean Altaic Indo-European Dravidian Afro-Asiatic Nilo-Saharan Niger-Congo Khoisan Language colours: Bantu SE Zulu Ancestry class 1 is typical of population Bantu SE Zulu from Subsaharian Africa (speaking a Atlantic-Congo language of the family Niger-Congo). Vysya Ancestry class 2 is typical of population Vysya from South Asia (speaking a South-Central-Dravidian language of theSardinian family Dravidian). Ancestry class 3 is typical of population Sardinian fromJapanese South Europe (speaking a Italic language of the family Indo-European). Tokyo Ancestry class 4 is typical of population Japanese Tokyo from East Asia (speaking a Japanese language of the family Japonic). Mlabri Ancestry class 5 is typical of population Mlabri from East Asia (speaking a Mon-Khmer language of the family Austro-Asiatic). Papuan Ancestry class 6 is typical of population Papuan from Oceania (speaking a Ndu language of the family Sepik). Surui Ancestry class 7 is typical of population Surui from South America (speaking a Monde language of the family Tupi). Yoruba Mala French Basque Japanese Negrito Jehai Melanesians Naasioi Karitiana Igbo Madiga North Italian Okinawan Bidayuh Jagoi NAN Melanesian Colombians Fang Chenchu Tuscan Koreans Temuan Alorese Pima Kongo Bhil Toscani Italia Daur Negrito Kensiu Lembata Maya Bantu SE Pedi Naidu French Hezhen Javanese Lamaholot Mexican LA Yoruba Nigeria