<<

MICRO- TRAPS FOR DETECTION OF (PRE )-BIOTIC ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ON COMETS . 2 2 F.H. W. van Amerom!, A. Chaudhary! , R. T. Short !, P. Roman , W. BrinckerhoFf, D. Glavin , and P. Mahaft)l, !SRI International, 450 8th Av SE, St. Petersburg, FL 3370) , 2Planetary Environments Laboratory Code 699.0, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 2077 1.

I ntrod uction : Comets are currently believed to be MS would be usefi.i1 fo r guiding sample retum missions a mixture of interstellar and nebular material [1-3]. to these targets by helping to identify optin1a 1 locations Many of the vo latiles in comets are attributed to inter­ to collect samples, and by monitoring vo latile com­ stellar , because the same species of carbona­ pOlUlds released fi"om the samples immediately after ceous compounds are also observed in ices in interstel­ collection and dw"ing transit back to Earth. lar molecular (I SM) clouds [4J. Comets are thus likely to be a relatively pristi.ne reservoir of pri.rrllti ve material and carbonaceous compounds in our solar system. They could be a major contributor to the delivery of pre biotic o rganic compounds, from which life emerged through impacts on early Earth [5, 6].

Figure 2: The two symmetrical f./ IT array half­ structures before bonding (left); the complete f./-CIT array obtained after bonding the two half-structures and mounting them on an Au-coated PCB substrate (right).

SRI has demonstrated that unit mass resolution can be obtained from ).L-CITs over a small mass range while maintaining high sensitivities using an array (Figure 3).

100 N,-

Figure 1: Artist impression o/the propo ed p -MS com­ 90 etary sampling concept. The total device will weigh toDD g; its size will be 10x10x10 cm with a sample isolation chamber of 1x1x2 cm, and it will have a low 70 po wer consumption of 4. 5 W

0,' Mass spectrometers are very powerful tools to iden­ tify unknown chemicals, and much progress bas been made in miniaturizing mas spectrometers fo r space app lications [7-1 0]. Most miniatu rized mass spectro­ meters developed to date, however, are still re latively large, power hungry, complicated to assemble [II , 12], and would have significant impact on space flight vehi­ cle total payload and resource allocati ons. mh(TlII Approach : Through previous funding, SRI has Figure 3. Experimental mass spectra l da ta from a Sin­ demonstrated proof-of-concept for creating high­ gle trap (zt!ro = 0. 97) in the f./ -CIT array. Axial modu­ precision arrays of extremely small (ca. 350 !ill1 ro) J.l­ lation was used to obtain better-than-unit mass resolu­ cylindrical ion trap geometries ()1-CITs) in silicon, and tion. Krypton doubly charged correspond to silicon-on- insulator sub trates using microelectro­ masses 82, 83, 84, and 86. mechanical (MEMS) fa brication techniques (Figure 2) [1 3, 14]. This work enables very significant miniaturi­ Conclusio ns : ew missions to comets and so lar zation of mass spectrometers, and consequently, SRI is system bodies, such as Enceladus, could reso lve the starting a project aimed at development of a J.l-MS op­ ambiguity in the measurements by res amp ling fo r amino timized fo r detection of low molecular weight pre­ acids and other prebiotic chemicals. Using a /!- CIT MS biotic compounds in cometary environments. Such a )1- diversifies oPPOIi unities for chemical analysis because of its low mass, vo lume, and power. These benefits could make a !l-MS ideal for reduced-cost and de­ scoped mission , and may open the door to including MS measurements where they were previously exclud­ ed because of power, mass, and vo lume constraints. Acknowledgements: Funding received from the U.S. Anny Space and Missile Defense Command (SMDC) through contract W9113M-06-C-0022 with tbe University of South Florida (Subcontract to SRI International). Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. References : [I] Mumma, M.J . et al. ( 1993) Proto­ stars and planets III, A93 , 1177-1252. [2] Irvine, W. (1999) Space Science Reviews, 90, 203-2 18. [3] Ehrenfreund, P. and Schutte, w.A. (2000) Advanc­ es in Space Research, 25, 2177-2188. [4] Fegley, B. (1999) Space Science Re views, 90, 239-252. [5] Chy­ ba, C. et a1. (1990) SCience, 249, 366-373. [6] Chyba, C.F. (1990) Nature, 343, 129-133 . [7] Palmer, P. and Limero, T. (2001) J. of the American Society for (2001) 12,656-675. [8] Austin, D. et al. (2007) Lunar and Planetary SCience, XXXVIII, 77573 . [9] Chutjian, A. et al. (2000) SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-2300 doi: I 0.4271 /2000-0 1-2300. [10] Roh­ ner, U. et al. (2003) Measurement Science & Technol­ ogy, 14, 2159-2164. [II] Ouyang, Z. and Cooks, R.G. (2009) Annual Re view of , 2, 187- 214. [12] Ouyang, Z. et al. (2009) Analytical chemis­ try, 81, 2421-2425. [13] Chaudhary, A. et a1. (2006) International J. of Mass Spectrometry, 251, 32-39. [14] van Amerom, F.H.W. et al. (2008) Chemical En­ gineering Communications, 195, 98-114.