Crossing Borders Fiona B. Adamson International Migration and National Security

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crossing Borders Fiona B. Adamson International Migration and National Security Crossing Borders Crossing Borders Fiona B. Adamson International Migration and National Security International migration has moved to the top of the international security agenda. Increasingly, policy- makers in the United States, Europe, and around the world are making links between migration policy and national security. Much of this discussion has focused on migration ºows as a conduit for international terrorism. The ability of nineteen hijackers from overseas to enter, live, and train in the United States in preparation for carrying out attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pen- tagon could not but raise concerns regarding the relationship between the cross-border mobility of people and international terrorism. Since the attacks of September 11, 2001, the management of migration has become a top na- tional security priority for the United States, with concerns about migration helping to drive the largest reorganization of the U.S. government since the passage of the National Security Act of 1947.1 Even before the September 11 attacks, however, interest in the relationship between globalization, migration, and security had emerged both in the policy world and in some areas of the security studies ªeld.2 Migration was high on the European security agenda throughout the 1990s.3 The bombings in Madrid Fiona B. Adamson is Director of the Program in International Public Policy and Assistant Professor of International Relations at University College London. A version of this article was presented at the John M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies workshop “Globalization and National Security,” on June 11–12, 2004, at Harvard University. The author thanks the organizer of the workshop, Jonathan Kirshner, and the workshop participants for their helpful suggestions. In addition, she is grateful to Nora Bensahel, Alexander Cooley, Peter Liberman, Pieter van Houten, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of this article. 1. Since March 1, 2003, immigration and border control have fallen within the purview of the De- partment of Homeland Security; in January 2004 the Department of Homeland Security rolled out the new US-VISIT program, which began to introduce biometric technology at all U.S. immigra- tion and border control points. 2. See, for example, Roxanne Lynn Doty, “Immigration and the Politics of Security,” Security Studies, Vol. 8, Nos. 2/3 (Winter 1998/99–Spring 1999), pp. 71–93; Keith Krause and Michael C. Williams, eds., Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997); Myron Weiner, “Security, Stability, and International Migration,” International Secu- rity, Vol. 17, No. 3 (Winter 1992/93), pp. 91–126; Myron Weiner, ed., International Migration and Security (Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1993); and Myron Weiner, ed., The Global Migration Crisis: Chal- lenges to States and to Human Rights (New York: HarperCollins, 1995). 3. Fiona B. Adamson, “Globalization, International Migration, and Changing Security Interests in Western Europe,” paper presented at the Ninety-ªfth Annual Meeting of the American Political International Security, Vol. 31, No. 1 (Summer 2006), pp. 165–199 © 2006 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 165 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/isec.2006.31.1.165 by guest on 30 September 2021 International Security 31:1 166 on March 11, 2004, and in London on July 7, 2005, only reinforced already- existing fears regarding the links between migration and terrorism in Europe. Earlier incidents, such as the 1995 bombings of the Paris metro system by Algeria’s Armed Islamic Group and attacks in various Western European states in the 1990s by the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, had already raised con- cerns regarding the relationship between migration and security. Some scholars have noted that the end of the Cold War and bipolarity has helped to transform both the nature and the function of national boundaries in ways that increasingly securitize migration and lead to a greater policing of national borders.4 In addition, concerns about the security impacts of massive refugee ºows and the roles that mobilized diasporas play in fueling violent conºicts around the globe were being discussed long before September 11.5 Moreover, migration and migrants have a long history of being viewed as closely linked to national security concerns. States have traditionally forged their national immigration policies in response to their security and economic interests.6 In the United States and other countries, migrants have all too often been viewed as national security threats during times of war or crisis because Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia, September 2–5, 1999; Sarah Collinson, Europe and Interna- tional Migration (London: Pinter, 1994); Jef Huysmans, “The European Union and the Securitiza- tion of Migration,” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 38, No. 5 (December 2000), pp. 751–777; Jef Huysmans, “Contested Community: Migration and the Question of the Political in the EU,” in Morten Kelstrup and Michael C. Williams, eds., International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security, and Community (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 149–170; Peter J. Katzenstein, “Regional Orders: Security in Europe and Asia,” paper presented at the Thirty- ninth Annual International Studies Association Convention, Minneapolis, Minnesota, March 17– 21, 1998; and Ole Waever, Barry Buzan, Morten Kelstrup, and Pierre LeMaitre, eds., Identity, Migra- tion, and the New Security Agenda in Europe (New York: St. Martin’s, 1993). 4. Peter Andreas, Border Games: Policing the U.S.-Mexico Divide (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2000); Peter Andreas and Timothy Snyder, eds., The Wall around the West: State Borders and Immigration Controls in North America and Europe (Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littleªeld, 2000); Didier Bigo, Polices en réseaux: L’Expérience Européene (Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 1996); Didier Bigo, “Security, Borders, and the State,” in Paul Ganster, Alan Sweedler, James Scott, and Wolf Dieter-Eberwein, eds., Borders and Border Regions in Europe and North America (San Diego, Calif.: San Diego State University Press, 1997), pp. 81–104; and Malcolm Anderson and Monica den Boer, eds., Policing across National Boundaries (London: Pinter, 1994). 5. Aristide R. Zolberg, Astri Suhrke, and Sergio Aguayo, Escape from Violence: Conºict and the Refu- gee Crisis in the Developing World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989); Gil Loescher, Beyond Charity: International Cooperation and the Global Refugee Crisis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993); Weiner, International Migration and Security; Barry R. Posen, “Military Responses to Refugee Disasters,” International Security, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Summer 1996), pp. 72–111; Mary Kaldor, New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1999); and Paul Collier, “Economic Causes of Civil Conºict and Their Implications for Policy,” Working Paper (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, June 15, 2000). 6. Christopher Rudolph, “Security and the Political Economy of Migration,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 97, No. 4 (November 2003), pp. 603–620. Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/isec.2006.31.1.165 by guest on 30 September 2021 Crossing Borders 167 of the possibility that they may possess dual political loyalties or represent a “ªfth column” in a conºict.7 Scholars in mainstream security studies have often dismissed such concerns as insigniªcant or as issues limited to matters of domestic politics and policy. Yet international security scholars and policymakers are ªnding it increasingly difªcult to ignore the relationship between migration and security in a highly interconnected world deªned by globalization processes. Globalization is changing the overall environment in which states operate, including how they formulate their security policies. The management of international migration ºows is one area in which policymakers are having to weigh the costs and beneªts of particular policies with an eye to their overall implications for inter- national security, in addition to their implications for other policy areas, such as social welfare and economic growth. To assess the implications of any par- ticular set of migration policies for national security, however, it is ªrst neces- sary to understand the ways in which migration ºows can potentially help or hinder states’ security interests. This article provides a framework for thinking about the relationship be- tween international migration and national security by surveying how cross- border migration ºows affect state interests in three core areas of national security concern: state sovereignty, or the overall capacity and autonomy of state actors; the balance of power among states; and the nature of violent conºict in the international system.8 A focus on traditional national security in- terests does not imply that such interests should always trump other factors relating to migration, or that a state-centric framework is the only lens through which to view the relationship between migration and security. Migration and migration policies are also closely intertwined with issues relating to individ- ual and human security. While human security and national security para- digms need not necessarily be diametrically opposed, each does suggest a particular analytical lens through which one
Recommended publications
  • Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban
    Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban A thesis submitted to the Miami University Honors Program in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for University Honors with Distinction by, Brandon Smith May 2005 Oxford, OH ABSTRACT AFGHANISTAN, 1989-1996: BETWEEN THE SOVIETS AND THE TALIBAN by, BRANDON SMITH This paper examines why the Afghan resistance fighters from the war against the Soviets, the mujahideen, were unable to establish a government in the time period between the withdrawal of the Soviet army from Afghanistan in 1989 and the consolidation of power by the Taliban in 1996. A number of conflicting explanations exist regarding Afghanistan’s instability during this time period. This paper argues that the developments in Afghanistan from 1989 to 1996 can be linked to the influence of actors outside Afghanistan, but not to the extent that the choices and actions of individual actors can be overlooked or ignored. Further, the choices and actions of individual actors need not be explained in terms of ancient animosities or historic tendencies, but rather were calculated moves to secure power. In support of this argument, international, national, and individual level factors are examined. ii Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban by, Brandon Smith Approved by: _________________________, Advisor Karen L. Dawisha _________________________, Reader John M. Rothgeb, Jr. _________________________, Reader Homayun Sidky Accepted by: ________________________, Director, University Honors Program iii Thanks to Karen Dawisha for her guidance and willingness to help on her year off, and to John Rothgeb and Homayun Sidky for taking the time to read the final draft and offer their feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • (Ph. D. Thesis) March, 1990 Takako Hirose
    THE SINGLE DOMINANT PARTY SYSTEM AND POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT: CASE STUDIES OF INDIA AND JAPAN (Ph. D. Thesis) March, 1990 Takako Hirose ABSTRACT This is an attempt to compare the processes of political development in India and Japan. The two states have been chosen because of some common features: these two Asian countries have preserved their own cultures despite certain degrees of modernisation; both have maintained a system of parliamentary democracy based on free electoral competition and universal franchise; both political systems are characterised by the prevalence of a single dominant party system. The primary objective of this analysis is to test the relevance of Western theories of political development. Three hypotheses have been formulated: on the relationship between economic growth and social modernisation on the one hand and political development on the other; on the establishment of a "nation-state" as a prerequisite for political development; and on the relationship between political stability and political development. For the purpose of testing these hypotheses, the two countries serve as good models because of their vastly different socio-economic conditions: the different levels of modernisation and economic growth; the homogeneity- heterogeneity dichotomy; and the frequency of political conflict. In conclusion, Japan is an apoliticised society in consequence of the imbalance between its political and economic development. By contrast, the Indian political system is characterised by an ever-increasing demand for - 2 - participation, with which current levels of institutionalisation cannot keep pace. The respective single dominant parties have thus played opposing roles, i.e. of apoliticising society in the case of Japan while encouraging participation in that of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Chad Raymond
    Dr. Chad Raymond Salve Regina University Department of Political Science 100 Ochre Point Avenue Newport, RI 02840 [email protected] (401)341-3294 EDUCATION University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, 1994-2000 Ph.D., Political Science. Dissertation: “Rational Resistance to a Weak Authoritarian State – The Political Economy of Vietnamese Farmers from Collectivization to Doi Moi.” Dissertation committee chair: Dr. Kate Xiao Zhou. Study of economic and political development, comparative politics, history, geography, Vietnamese, and Khmer. College of Foreign Languages, Hanoi, Vietnam, 1995 – 1996 Intensive study of Vietnamese. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1984-1989 B.S. and M.S., Political Science. Master’s thesis: “The Role of Refugee Assistance in Supporting Guerrilla Movements – A Case Study of the Thai-Cambodian Border Camps.” Thesis advisors: Drs. Myron Weiner and Lucian Pye. Study of development, Middle East, Africa, Soviet Union, the Cold War, and U.S. foreign policy. TEACHING EXPERIENCE Salve Regina University, Newport, RI, 2008 – present Assistant Professor. International political economy (INR 533), comparative political development (INR 513), politics of the Middle East (INR 586), politics of developing nations (POL 330), comparative politics (POL 240), introduction to world politics (POL 120), introduction to global studies (GLO 100), just and unjust wars (INR 531), complex humanitarian emergencies (INR/ADJ 572), and contemporary Asia (HIS/POL 334). Elon University, Elon, NC, 2006 – 2008 Assistant Professor. International relations, international political economy, comparative politics, politics of Asia, and the Vietnam War. Gardner-Webb University, Boiling Springs, NC, 2002 – 2006 Assistant Professor. International relations, international political economy, comparative politics, politics of developing areas, politics of the Middle East, politics of Asia, post-1945 world history and politics, and introduction to political science.
    [Show full text]
  • Studying Abroad and Chinese Attitudes Towards International Affairs* Donglin Han and David Zweig
    290 Images of the World: Studying Abroad and Chinese Attitudes towards International Affairs* Donglin Han and David Zweig ABSTRACT Since the late 19th century many Chinese leaders have studied abroad, mostly in Japan, the US or the former Soviet Union. Recently, thousands are returning from studying overseas. Is this new cohort of returnees more internationalist than Chinese who do not study abroad? If their values differ and they join China’s elite, they could influence China’s foreign policy. Drawing on surveys of returnees from Japan and Canada over the past 15 years, we compare their views on “co-operative internation- alism” and “assertive nationalism” with the attitudes of China’s middle class drawn from a nationwide survey in 2006. Our returnees are both more “internationalist” than the middle class and less nationalistic. So they are likely to support China’s increasing international role and perhaps constrain China’s growing nationalist sentiment. The movement of people across borders affects international relations and dom- estic politics.1 Internationally, increased immigration and emigration challenge state sovereignty,2 increase dependency3 and expand transnational linkages.4 Domestically, migration not only contributes to the internationalization of local and domestic politics,5 but also affects national security and social stability. * This paper was originally presented at the Conference on “Foreign-Domestic Linkages in China’s International Behaviour,” Centre for Asia-Pacific Initiatives, University of Victoria, BC, 24–25 April 2008. We wish to thank Wu Guoguang for his support. 1 James F. Hollifield, “The politics of international migration: how can we ‘bring the state back in’?” in Caroline B.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Order in Changing Societies
    Political Order in Changing Societies by Samuel P. Huntington New Haven and London, Yale University Press Copyright © 1968 by Yale University. Seventh printing, 1973. Designed by John O. C. McCrillis, set in Baskerville type, and printed in the United States of America by The Colonial Press Inc., Clinton, Mass. For Nancy, All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form Timothy, and Nicholas (except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Library of Congress catalog card number: 68-27756 ISBN: 0-300-00584-9 (cloth), 0-300-01171-'7 (paper) Published in Great Britain, Europe, and Africa by Yale University Press, Ltd., London. Distributed in Latin America by Kaiman anti Polon, Inc., New York City; in Australasia and Southeast Asia by John Wiley & Sons Australasia Pty. Ltd., Sidney; in India by UBS Publishers' Distributors Pvt., Ltd., Delhi; in Japan by John Weatherhill, Inc., Tokyo. I·-~· I I. Political Order and Political Decay THE POLITICAL GAP The most important political distinction among countries con­ i cerns not their form of government but their degree of govern­ ment. The differences between democracy and dictatorship are less i than the differences between those countries whose politics em­ , bodies consensus, community, legitimacy, organization, effective­ ness, stability, and those countries whose politics is deficient in these qualities. Communist totalitarian states and Western liberal .states both belong generally in the category of effective rather than debile political systems. The United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union have different forms of government, but in all three systems the government governs.
    [Show full text]
  • Abramo Fimo Kenneth Organski Myron Weiner
    Al leaves his wife Eva, son Stefan sities of Turin, Catania, and Flo- Myron Weiner and daughter Vera. He leaves us rence. He was honored as a guest of missing his impish challenges to aca- the University of Bologna on the Myron Weiner, Ford International demic and bureaucratic pomposity occasion of that university's 900th Professor of Political Science at and the infectious laugh that marked anniversary and was awarded the MIT, the nation's leading authority his conversations with so many gen- Cavaleri dela Republica by the gov- on Indian political studies and a specialist in the fields of political erations of students. ernment of Italy. development, political demography, Arlene W. Saxonhouse His books included World Politics; University of Michigan migration, ethnic conflict, and child Population and World Power, coau- labor, died in his Vermont home on William Zimmerman thored with his first wife, Katherine June 3, 1999, of a brain tumor, University of Michigan Davis Fox; Birth, Death and Taxes, which was first diagnosed in Decem- written with several of his students; ber. He was born in New York City Stages of Political Development; The in 1931, graduated Phi Beta Kappa Abramo Fimo Kenneth War Ledger, written with Jacek Ku- from City College of New York in Organski gler; and The Thirty-Six Billion Dol- 1951, and received his advanced de- lar Bargain. Abramo Fimo Kenneth Organski, grees from Princeton in 1955. He professor of political science and In 1981, Professor Organski, to- taught at Princeton and Chicago senior research scientist, Center for gether with Drs. Jacek Kugler and before coming to MIT in 1961.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Priorities in Refugee Protection: the Rwandan Repatriation from Tanzania
    NEW ISSUES IN REFUGEE RESEARCH Working Paper No. 53 Changing priorities in refugee protection: the Rwandan repatriation from Tanzania Beth Elise Whitaker Department of Political Science George Washington University Washington, DC USA E-mail: [email protected] February 2002 These working papers are issued by the Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit, and provide a means for UNHCR staff, consultants, interns and associates to publish the preliminary results of their research on refugee-related issues. The papers are written in a personal capacity and do not represent the official views of UNHCR. They are also available online under ‘Publications’ on the UNHCR website, http://www.unhcr.org ISSN 1020-7473 Introduction On December 5, 1996, the Tanzanian government and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) issued a joint statement that read, in part, “all Rwandese refugees in Tanzania are expected to return home by 31 December 1996.”1 That same day, UNHCR distributed information sheets to refugees about the repatriation exercise, including the immediate suspension of economic and agricultural activities in the camps. The camps had been home to more than half a million Rwandan refugees since 1994, when they fled civil war and an advancing rebel army at home. They were eventually joined in Tanzania by nearly 500,000 refugees from Burundi and Zaire.2 As a haven of peace in a troubled region, Tanzania had long hosted refugees from neighboring countries. By December 1996, however, patience seemed to have run out. 3 Upon receiving the repatriation announcement, many refugees wanted extra time to see how the integration of returnees from Zaire would unfold within Rwanda.4 Several wrote a letter to Tanzanian President Benjamin Mkapa requesting him to reconsider the December 31 deadline.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH ASIA at CHICAGO: a History by Richard H
    SOUTH ASIA AT CHICAGO: a history by Richard H. Davis foreword by Milton Singer Conlmittee on Southern Asian Studies University of Chicago COSAS NEW SERIES NO.1 Committee on Southern Asian Studies The University of Chicago 1130 E. 59th St., Chicago, IL 60637 SOUTH ASIA AT CHICAGO: A HISTORY Richard H. Davis foreword by Milton Singer CaSAS New Series, No.1 April, 1985 Editor, David L. Gitorner Photograph opposite: All-India Conference of Sociologists and Anthropologists, November 5-7, 1955, meeting under auspices of University of Madras and M.S. University of Baroda. Among participants are: (front row) A. Aiyappan (1), L.K. Ba1a Ratnam (2), U.R. Ehrenfe1s (3), Nirma1 Kumar Bose (5), lrwati Karve (7), Robert Redfield (9), V. Raghavan (10), L.A. Krishna lyer (11) (second row) L.P. Vidyarthi (5), Pauline Kolenda (8), Margaret Redfield (10), Clarence E. Glick (14), T.K. Venkatesvara (15), Myron Weiner (16) (third row) lndera Paul Singh (6), John Gumperz (9), M.N. Srinivas (10), Louise Harper (11), Edward Harper (12) UIlUIIIlIIIIIIIIlIIl 1I1111l1l1lHlIIlII"l iiiiiiitiii ,. , UllIlIlIllllllllluil UUIIIIIlIIIIIllllll 1II1llUIlJ =-""'---._~'-- ~ ;ftn'1-mtnm. ""IIIl.lflll"UlIlII 11111,11111 • --------~" ~=-,---- TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD vii PREFACE • .xiii Chapter I THE ANCESTORS (1892-1945) 1 II A NEW CLIMATE • 15 III THE REDFIELD PROJECT 29 IV THE TAKE-OFF (1955-1966) 41 V EPILOGUE (1966-1985) 65 BIBLIOGRAPHY • • 77 v FOREWORD The study of South Asia is now organized at the University of Chicago under the auspices of five administrative units--the Committee on Southern Asian Studies, the College's "Introduction to South Asian Civilization" course and associated B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Sidney Verba Born
    CURRICULUM VITAE Sidney Verba Born: May 26, 1932 PRESENT POSITION Carl H. Pforzheimer University Professor (Emeritus) and Research Professor of Government, Harvard University Director of the Harvard University Library emeritus PREVIOUS POSITIONS Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, 1981-84 Clarence Dillon Professor of International Affairs, Harvard University, 1983-84 Professor of Political Science, University of Chicago, 1968-72 Senior Study Director, National Opinion Research Center, 1968-72 Professor of Political Science, Stanford University, 1964-68 Assistant and Associate Professor of Politics, Princeton University, 1960-64 EDUCATION M.A., Ph.D., Princeton University, 1957, 1959 B.A., Harvard College, 1953 HONORS Helen Dinerman Prize for Lifetime Contribution to Public Opinion research, World Association of Public Opinion research, 2004. Johann Skytte Prize, University of Uppsala for distinguished contribution to political science. 2002 Warren Miller Prize, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, 2001, for Distinguished Contribution to the Social Sciences. Warren Miller Award, American Political Science Association, 2000, For Career Contribution to the Study of Public Opinion and Elections Tanner Lecturer, Oxford University, 1999. Johan Skytte Prize, University of Uppsala, for Lifetime Contribution to Political Science James Madison Award, American Political Science Association, 1993. Award Given Triennially for a Career Contribution to Political Science
    [Show full text]
  • 06 Kamath Pg 315-336
    Shyam J. Kamath INDIAN DEVELOPMENT AND POVERTY: MAKING SENSE OF SEN ET AL. ABSTRACT: The work of Amartya Sen and his collaborators on Indian economic development compares three Indian states so as to demonstrate the superior per- formance of interventionist, left-wing governments in West Bengal and Kerala compared to the more typical state of Uttar Pradesh.A careful analysis of the ev- idence, however, shows that Sen et al. ignore the anti-interventionist implications of their own evidence of corruption in the state of Uttar Pradesh; dramatically overstate the success of leftist governments in West Bengal; and overlook the role of Kerala’s culture and its private education system in accounting for its famously high levels of literacy and female independence. Amartya Sen, the Indian-born economist, was awarded the Nobel prize in economics. In the citation for the award, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences () stated that the award was given for Professor Sen’s contributions to welfare economics in the fields of social choice, welfare distribution, and poverty. The Swedish Acad- emy summarized his contributions in this manner: Amartya Sen has made several key contributions to the research in fundamental problems in welfare economics. His contributions range from axiomatic theories of social choice, over definitions of welfare Critical Review (), nos. – . ISSN ‒.© Critical Review Foundation. Shyam J. Kamath, Department of Economics, California State University, Hayward, CA , telephone () -, would like to thank Sudha Shenoy of the University of Newcastle, Australia for her suggestions, help and advice. An earlier version of this paper was presented to the Economics Research Workshop at California State University, Hayward.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW When Writing to Advertisers
    The American . Political Science Review BOARD OF EDITORS https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Ausin Ranney, Managing Editor J. Roland Pennock, Swarthmore College University of Wisconsin John E. Turner, University of Minnesota Fred I. Greenstein Wesleyan University Harvey C. Mansfield, Columbia University Vernon Van Dyke, University of Iowa Warren E. Miller, University of Michigan Myron Weiner, Massachusetts Institute of Walter F. Murphy, Princeton University Technology , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at VOLUME LXI 1967 28 Sep 2021 at 20:37:30 , on 170.106.202.226 Copyright, 1967, by THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION . IP address: GEORGE BANTA COMPANY, INC. MENASHA, WISCONSIN https://www.cambridge.org/core https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400223927 Downloaded from CONTENTS NUMBER 1—-MARCH, 1967 Tke Public Philosophy: Interest-Group Liberalism. Theodore Lowi 5 . The Child's Acquisition of Regime Norms: Political Efficacy. David Easton and Jack Dennis.... 25 Political Dualism and Italian Communism. Sidney G. Tarrow 39 Bar Politics, Judicial Selection and the Representation of Social Interests. Richard A. Watson, Rondal G. Downing, and Frederick C. Spiegel 54 Toward a Communications Theory of Democratic Political Development: A Causal Model. Donald J. McCrone and Charles F. Cnudde 72 Soviet Policy in Latin America. Herbert S. Dinerstein 80 An End to European Integration? Ronald Inglehart 91 Academic Ideology and the Study of Adjudication. Glendon Schubert 106 RESEARCH NOTES Causal Inferences, Closed Populations, and Measures of Association. Hubert M. Blalock.... 130 https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Politicians' Beliefs about Voters. John W. Kingdon 137 Some Comments on Russett's "Discovering Voting Groups in the United Nations." John E.
    [Show full text]
  • Myron Weiner (1931-1999)
    914 THE JOURNAL OF ASIAN STUDIES political and economic devastation. He documented the Asian country's deterioration under authoritarian rule in such books as The Burma Road to Poverty and Totalitarianism in Burma, which were based, in part, on interviews with Burmese citizens who had fled the regime. "The military rulers' relentless control of not only the life of the people but also the natural resources has been and will be the hardest problem of economic development confronting Burma," he wrote in 1993. That year, he was among 200 international leaders invited by former President Jimmy Carter to participate in a conflict-resolution program at the Carter Center at Emory University in Atlanta, at which he called for an embargo on Burma until its military rulers ceded power to the winners of a multiparty democratic election. "There is no ethical reason to support a junta that has slaughtered thousands of innocent people," he said in an interview with the Boston College Chronicle. Maung, a native of the Burmese capital of Rangoon, studied in the United States in the late 1950s before returning to Burma in 1961 as head of the economics department of the national military academy. In 1963, a year after a military coup in the country, Maung left Burma following disagreements with his superiors over what he could and could not teach under the new regime. He never lost a passionate concern for the land he had left behind, "When you are born in a certain country, I don't think you can ever get rid of that," he said in a 1991 interview.
    [Show full text]