DOCSLIB.ORG

Analysis of Leaders from the Peloponnesian War Luke Klein SUNY Geneseo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analysis of Leaders from the Peloponnesian War Luke Klein SUNY Geneseo Proceedings of GREAT Day Volume 2010 Article 14 2011 Analysis of Leaders from the Peloponnesian War Luke Klein SUNY Geneseo Follow this and additional works at: https://knightscholar.geneseo.edu/proceedings-of-great-day Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Klein, Luke (2011) "Analysis of Leaders from the Peloponnesian War," Proceedings of GREAT Day: Vol. 2010 , Article 14. Available at: https://knightscholar.geneseo.edu/proceedings-of-great-day/vol2010/iss1/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the GREAT Day at KnightScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of GREAT Day by an authorized editor of KnightScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Klein: Analysis of Leaders from the Peloponnesian War Analysis of Leaders from the Peloponnesian War Submitted by: Luke Klein A leader in nearly any society needs many populous of Athens (Thucydides, 144-151.) characteristics to be effective for the people they Alcibiades’s eloquence also served him well in rule and for the land they serve: an effective convincing the Assembly to attack Sicily leader needs to be an eloquent speaker so as to explaining that to not attack would embolden inspire the people to serve the state and inspire their enemies and potentially cause them to loyalty; simultaneously, a leader needs to be think Athens weak; his argument was so open to opinions of others, accept a certain compelling that it caused a rival commander’s amount of opposition, and take criticisms and argument against going to war with to Sicily to suggestions in stride; a leader must think for the backfire and further harden the Athenian resolve good of the people and state in both the short for war (419-425.) King Archidamus of Sparta and long term as opposed to exclusively the spoke regarding waging war with Athens to the short-term; and a leader must lead by example, Spartan assembly, recommending that, instead meaning they should not live extravagantly and of ignoring the Athenian aggression or meeting should attempt to be humble. The them immediately in the field, the Spartans wait Peloponnesian War witnessed the rise of three and consolidate their power and money while influential leaders of the time: Pericles of helping their allies against Athens (83-84); the Athens, Alcibiades of Athens, and King Spartans, however, were swayed by the Archidamus of Sparta; these men led their arguments of Sthenelaidas (86) and Sparta’s people through a war that lasted twenty-seven allies (73-77) in addition to the seemingly- years and would have dire consequences for haughty speech from the Athenian Greece. representatives (78-82.) All of the leaders were Eloquence in speeches has been eloquent and confident in their speeches, even important in efficient leadership since before the though only Alicbiades and Pericles were Peloponnesian War; in fact, in Athenian effective in gaining what they desired. democracy, eloquence in the Assembly could For a leader to be open to opinions, mean the difference between peace and war or criticism and opposition takes time and whether or not a law was passed, as every experience, and to accept change takes wisdom citizen was given the opportunity to speak if and strength; in addition, a leader must reply they so desired (Perry, 42.) Pericles, a general appropriately to whatever criticisms and attacks in the Peloponnesian War for Athens, was able they come under. Pericles faced much to sway those at the public funeral for the first opposition and criticism during the of the fallen soldiers in the war to support the Peloponnesian War during the plague that war, the people of Athens, and the army, devastated Athens from the populous; he replied inspiring patriotism and fervor throughout the to them by attempting to guide their anger and 106 Published by KnightScholar, 2011 1 Proceedings of GREAT Day, Vol. 2010 [2011], Art. 14 frustration at their situation at hand away from Alcibiades, in much a similar manner to him to the conflict with the Peloponnese (158- Archidamus and Pericles, faced criticism from 9); Pericles was removed from his title of his rivals. Unlike Pericles and Archidamus, the general, only to be re-instated for a short time attacks regarded Alcibiades’ character and before his death, after the Athenian Assembly actions outside the Assembly; in his reply, realized Pericles had been right to attempt to re- instead of merely attempting to persuade the direct their anger (163.) Assembly to attack Sicily and ignoring the King Archidamus was also criticized by attacks on his personal life, he commenced his allies, in addition to Sparta on the whole. justifying his supposed extravagance outside the Archidamus invited delegates from the city- Assembly, and began to speak of himself as states that were claiming Athenian aggression to though he were a hero who deserved some extra state their cases, and then Sparta would consider liberties. what action to take. The Corinthian delegates “…[S]ince Nicias has made this attack were the ones who mainly pointed out that the on me, I must begin by saying that I have a Spartans were usually very wary when it came better right than others to hold the command to conflicts, and only became involved when it and that I think I am quite worthy of the could directly influence their state (73-77.) position. As for all the talk there is against Archidamus, after the foreign delegates had me, it is about things which bring [honor] to my taken a recess from the chambers, pointed out to ancestors and myself, and to our country his fellow Spartans that to wage war against profit as well. There was a time when the Athens would be a massive undertaking that Hellenes imagined that our city had been would influence not just the present rulers, but ruined by the war, but they came to consider it would likely involve the next generation of even greater than it really is, because of leaders (82-83). In addition, Archidamus the splendid show I made as its representative at believed that to charge head-first into battle the Olympic games, when I entered without proper knowledge and resources would seven chariots for the chariot race…and took be suicide and he said that to delay and be first, second, and fourth places…it is quite prepared is better than to take action only to be natural for my fellow citizens to envy me for the later caught off-guard and destroyed (84-85.) magnificence with which I have done Archidamus then opened the floor to a vote as to things in Athens…” (Thucydides, 419) whether or not to go to war with Athens or to The impression Alcibiades gave to his rivals wait a few years; in spite of his proposal being after delivering this speech was that of one defeated by an overwhelming margin, looking to become a dictator and destroy the Archidamus supported the decision of his democracy in Athens (419). Alcibiades’ rivals people and his allies, and led them during the used his extravagance against him, claiming that war. The decision to wage war on the he and other extravagant young men defaced Athenians by Sparta not only influenced the Hermae around Athens as an act against next generation of leaders as Archidamus democracy; Alcibiades denied the charges, and predicted, but began the rapid decline of the set out for Sicily before he could stand trial Greek city-states, eventually leading to their fall (426-427.) at the hands of Philip II of Macedonia (Perry, An effective leader also holds the long- 44.) term stability of the people and state above the short-term success that one attains while in 107 https://knightscholar.geneseo.edu/proceedings-of-great-day/vol2010/iss1/14 2 Klein: Analysis of Leaders from the Peloponnesian War power. Pericles and Archidamus both realized this would have likely saved the Athenians from this about their states and worked toward that their destruction had they done so (163.) goal: Pericles realized that holding back a Alcibiades, unlike Pericles and portion of the Athenian navy to defend from the Archidamus, did not lead by example very Peloponnesian navy was more advantageous to often. The examples Alcibiades set for his the Athenian cause than would sending out the troops off the battlefield were abhorred by entire navy and not attempt to expand until after nearly everyone in Athens as he lived a the war, even though his successors did the grandiose and questionable lifestyle, for which precise opposite (163). Archidamus, he had drawn much negative attention. One of meanwhile, thought if Sparta and its allies were his fellow commanders and rivals, Nicias, to have a chance against Athens, the Spartans pointed this out when attempting to dissuade would need to consolidate their power for Athens from attacking Sicily. The fact that another few years before being strong enough to Alcibiades did not attempt to hide his defeat Athens as quickly as possible, even extravagance—indeed, to an extent he flaunted though the majority of the other Spartans did not it—made him despised by many, and took away share his sentiments (82-87.) Alcibiades, unlike from the leadership quality he had in their eyes. Pericles and Archidamus, cared less for the In analyzing Thucydides’s History of the good of the state; rather, he cared more for Peloponnesian War, we encounter three leaders personal gain and glory in his command in the during that time who heavily influenced the forces going to Sicily, as Nicias pointed out and outcome of the war: King Archidamus of Alcibiades, for the most part, confirmed the Sparta, Pericles of Athens, and Alcibiades of allegations (415-422.) Athens.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Roles of Solon in Plato's Dialogues
    The Roles of Solon in Plato’s Dialogues Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Samuel Ortencio Flores, M.A. Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Bruce Heiden, Advisor Anthony Kaldellis Richard Fletcher Greg Anderson Copyrighy by Samuel Ortencio Flores 2013 Abstract This dissertation is a study of Plato’s use and adaptation of an earlier model and tradition of wisdom based on the thought and legacy of the sixth-century archon, legislator, and poet Solon. Solon is cited and/or quoted thirty-four times in Plato’s dialogues, and alluded to many more times. My study shows that these references and allusions have deeper meaning when contextualized within the reception of Solon in the classical period. For Plato, Solon is a rhetorically powerful figure in advancing the relatively new practice of philosophy in Athens. While Solon himself did not adequately establish justice in the city, his legacy provided a model upon which Platonic philosophy could improve. Chapter One surveys the passing references to Solon in the dialogues as an introduction to my chapters on the dialogues in which Solon is a very prominent figure, Timaeus- Critias, Republic, and Laws. Chapter Two examines Critias’ use of his ancestor Solon to establish his own philosophic credentials. Chapter Three suggests that Socrates re- appropriates the aims and themes of Solon’s political poetry for Socratic philosophy. Chapter Four suggests that Solon provides a legislative model which Plato reconstructs in the Laws for the philosopher to supplant the role of legislator in Greek thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese
    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis 2–3 and Alcibiades's Speech in Plato's Symposium: a Cultural
    Page 1 of 6 Original Research Genesis 2–3 and Alcibiades’s speech in Plato’s Symposium: A cultural critical reading Author: The purpose of this article is to discuss some basic problems and methodological steps 1,2 Evangelia G. Dafni concerning the encounter between Hebrews and Greeks in the Classical period and its impact Affiliations: on the Hellenistic era. The relationship between the Old Testament and Ancient Greek 1Department of Ecclesiastical literature will be examined on the basis of Genesis 2–3 and Alcibiades’s speech in Plato’s and Social Theology, Faculty Symposium (212c–223d). The following considerations and models of interpretation can arise of Theology, Aristotle from the analysis of Alcibiades’s speech compared to M- and LXX-Genesis 2–3: (1) Ancient University of Thessaloniki, Greece Greek writers were familiar with Old Testament oral or written traditions through improvised translations. They prepared the way for the LXX and, in their compositions, were in dispute 2Department of Old with them although they do not make specific references to the Hebrews and their literature; Testament Studies, Faculty (2) Hebrew authors knew the works of Ancient Greek authors and used Greek philosophical of Theology, University of Pretoria, South Africa terminology which they creatively adapted to Semitic models; (3) Both models are possible. One should not rush to any decisions but examine each case individually, in the original Note: language. Professor Evangelia Dafni is a Research Associate of Professor Dirk Human in the Department of Old Testament Introduction Studies at the Faculty of Genesis 2–3 is of central importance for the anthropology of the Old Testament: It describes in Theology, University of Pretoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander's Empire
    4 Alexander’s Empire MAIN IDEA WHY IT MATTERS NOW TERMS & NAMES EMPIRE BUILDING Alexander the Alexander’s empire extended • Philip II •Alexander Great conquered Persia and Egypt across an area that today consists •Macedonia the Great and extended his empire to the of many nations and diverse • Darius III Indus River in northwest India. cultures. SETTING THE STAGE The Peloponnesian War severely weakened several Greek city-states. This caused a rapid decline in their military and economic power. In the nearby kingdom of Macedonia, King Philip II took note. Philip dreamed of taking control of Greece and then moving against Persia to seize its vast wealth. Philip also hoped to avenge the Persian invasion of Greece in 480 B.C. TAKING NOTES Philip Builds Macedonian Power Outlining Use an outline to organize main ideas The kingdom of Macedonia, located just north of Greece, about the growth of had rough terrain and a cold climate. The Macedonians were Alexander's empire. a hardy people who lived in mountain villages rather than city-states. Most Macedonian nobles thought of themselves Alexander's Empire as Greeks. The Greeks, however, looked down on the I. Philip Builds Macedonian Power Macedonians as uncivilized foreigners who had no great A. philosophers, sculptors, or writers. The Macedonians did have one very B. important resource—their shrewd and fearless kings. II. Alexander Conquers Persia Philip’s Army In 359 B.C., Philip II became king of Macedonia. Though only 23 years old, he quickly proved to be a brilliant general and a ruthless politician. Philip transformed the rugged peasants under his command into a well-trained professional army.
    [Show full text]
  • The Family Connection of Alcibiades and Axiochus , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:2 (1986:Summer) P.173
    STANLEY, PHILLIP V., The Family Connection of Alcibiades and Axiochus , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:2 (1986:Summer) p.173 The Family Connection of Alcibiades and Axiochus Phillip V. Stanley LTHOUGH THE ANCESTRY of the Athenian general Alcibiades A III remains obscure for the sixth century, his genealogy is as­ sumed to be secure for the fifth. The descent of the family from Alcibiades I to Alcibiades IV has been reconstructed by Vander­ pool in the following way:l Alcibiades J2 I Cleinias I I Alcibiades II I I Axiochus Cleinias II I I I I Cleinias III Alcibiades III Cleinias IV I Alcibiades IV I E. Vanderpool, "The Ostracism of the Elder Alcibiades," Hesperia 21 (I952) 1-8, esp. 6. Cr. M. B. Wallace, "Early Greek Proxenoi," Phoenix 24 (I 970) 196f; 1. K. DAVIES, Athenian Propertied Families (Oxford 1971 [hereafter APF)) 10-12. According to Isoc. 16.25f (delivered by Alcibiades IV, son of the general), Alcibiades I, the ally of Cleisthenes when he expelled Hippias from Athens, was the great-grandfather (1TpO- 1Ta1T1To~) of Alcibiades III. The general difficulty stems from the apparent need to reduce the number of generations separating Alcibiades I from Alcibiades III, believed to be five: if the number is not reduced, Alcibiades I would actually be the great-great­ grandfather of the general. 2 Roman numerals are those assigned in PA and APF. These numerals will continue to be used even when homonyms are added to the family's genealogy. In order to avoid the confusion that might result if a major overhaul of the numerical system for this family were attempted, and to preserve the numerical descent established for the branch of the family to which Alcibiades III belongs, the newly identified individual will be assigned the next available Roman numeral, even though he may be earlier than an individual with the same name whose number is lower.
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Royalty in Sparta of the 3Rd Century B.C
    HESPERIA 75 (2006) ART AND ROYALTY Pages 203?217 IN SPARTA OF THE 3RD CENTURY B.C. ABSTRACT a The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that revival of the arts in Sparta b.c. was during the 3rd century owed mainly to royal patronage, and that it was inspired by Alexander s successors, the Seleukids and the Ptolemies in particular. The tumultuous transition from the traditional Spartan dyarchy to a and to its dominance Hellenistic-style monarchy, Sparta's attempts regain in the P?loponn?se (lost since the battle of Leuktra in 371 b.c.), are reflected in the of the hero Herakles as a role model promotion pan-Peloponnesian at for the single king the expense of the Dioskouroi, who symbolized dual a kingship and had limited, regional appeal. INTRODUCTION was Spartan influence in the P?loponn?se dramatically reduced after the battle of Leuktra in 371 b.c.1 The history of Sparta in the 3rd century b.c. to ismarked by intermittent efforts reassert Lakedaimonian hegemony.2 A as a means to tendency toward absolutism that end intensified the latent power struggle between the Agiad and Eurypontid royal houses, leading to the virtual abolition of the traditional dyarchy in the reign of the Agiad Kleomenes III (ca. 235-222 b.c.), who appointed his brother Eukleides 1. For the battle of Leuktra and its am to and Ellen Millen 2005.1 grateful Graham Shipley Paul Cartledge and see me to am consequences, Cartledge 2002, and Ellen Millender for inviting der for historical advice. I also 251-259.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in Two City States--- Athens and Sparta
    - . CHAPTER The city-states of Sparta (above) and Athens (below) were bitter rivals. Life in Two City-States Athens and Sparta 27.1 Introduction In Chapter 26, you learned that ancient Greece was a collection of city- states, each with its own government. In this chapter, you will learn about two of the most important Greek city-states, Athens and Sparta. They not only had different forms of government, but very different ways of life. Athens was a walled city near the sea. Nearby, ships came and went from a busy port. Inside the city walls, master potters and sculptors labored in work- shops. Wealthy people and their slaves strolled through the marketplace. Often the city's citizens (free men) gathered to loudly debate the issues of the day. Sparta was located in a farming area on a plain. No walls surrounded the city. Its buildings were simple and plain compared to those of Athens. Even the clothing of the people in the streets was drab. Columns of soldiers tramped through the streets, with fierce expressions behind their bronze helmets. Even a casual visitor could see that Athens and Sparta were very different. Let's take a closer look at the way people lived in these two city-states. We'll examine each city's government, economy, education, and treatment of women and slaves. Use this graphic organizer to help you compare various aspects of life in Athens and Sparta. Life in Two City-States: Athens and Sparta 259 27.2 Comparing Two City-States Peloponnesus the penin- Athens and Sparta were both Greek cities, and they were only sula forming the southern part about 150 miles apart.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideals and Pragmatism in Greek Military Thought 490-338 Bc
    Roel Konijnendijk IDEALS AND PRAGMATISM IN GREEK MILITARY THOUGHT 490-338 BC PhD Thesis – Ancient History – UCL I, Roel Konijnendijk, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Thesis Abstract This thesis examines the principles that defined the military thinking of the Classical Greek city-states. Its focus is on tactical thought: Greek conceptions of the means, methods, and purpose of engaging the enemy in battle. Through an analysis of historical accounts of battles and campaigns, accompanied by a parallel study of surviving military treatises from the period, it draws a new picture of the tactical options that were available, and of the ideals that lay behind them. It has long been argued that Greek tactics were deliberately primitive, restricted by conventions that prescribed the correct way to fight a battle and limited the extent to which victory could be exploited. Recent reinterpretations of the nature of Greek warfare cast doubt on this view, prompting a reassessment of tactical thought – a subject that revisionist scholars have not yet treated in detail. This study shows that practically all the assumptions of the traditional model are wrong. Tactical thought was constrained chiefly by the extreme vulnerability of the hoplite phalanx, its total lack of training, and the general’s limited capacity for command and control on the battlefield. Greek commanders, however, did not let any moral rules get in the way of possible solutions to these problems. Battle was meant to create an opportunity for the wholesale destruction of the enemy, and any available means were deployed towards that goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece, the Land Where Myths Replaces Reality
    GREECE, THE LAND WHERE MYTHS REPLACE REALITY (Myths about Epirus) What is myth and what does it serve? Myth is a narrative based usually on a false story which can not be used as a replacement of history, but sometimes myth might be considered a distorted account of a real historical event. The myth does not differ much from a folktale and usually the boundary between them is very thin. Myth must not be used to reconstruct, however in the ancient society of the so called “”Ancient Greeks”” myth was usually regarded as a true account for a remote past. Surprisingly this ‘tradition’ is descended to the Modern Greeks as well. They never loose the chance to use the myths and the mythology of a remote past and to pose them as their real ethnic history. This job is being done combining the ancient myths with the ones already created in the modern era. Now let’s take a look at two Greek myths, respectively one ancient and one modern, while our job is to prove that even these myths are respectively hijacked or created to join realities not related to each other, but unfortunately propagandized belonging to a real history, the history of the Greek race. Thus before we analyze and expose some of their myths which are uncountable, we are inclined to say that whatever is considered Greek History is completely based on mythical stories, whose reliability and truthiness is deeply compromised for the mere fact that is based on myths not only by the Modern Greeks and especially philhellenes, but even by the ancient authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcibiades: Why the Politically Ambitious Cannot Be Educated to Philosophic Virtue
    Honors Thesis Topic: Alcibiades: Why the Politically Ambitious cannot be Educated to Philosophic Virtue By Tori Nickol Professor: Dr. Parsons i 2 Abstract In the Alcibiades I dialogue, Socrates attempts to educate the extremely ambitious and beautiful Alcibiades to a life of philosophic virtue. Despite this education, Alcibiades proceeds to a life of infamy and tyrannical aspirations, which prompts one to ask the question: what are the limits of a political individual in a philosophic life, and vice versa? Ultimately, an examination of the Alcibiades I dialogue reveals that political types generally fail as philosophers because they are dependent on the city for enabling their ignorance. Philosophers, by contrast, cannot be political men because they are too focused on the development of the individual as opposed to the growth of the city. It is this emphasis on the individual that leads Socrates to attempt an education of Alcibiades (despite being aware of the dangers such an education may hold for the city)—promising, ambitious individuals ought to be educated in the hopes that they may become the best men, even if such a risk comes at the cost of an entire city. 3 Introduction Alcibiades is perhaps the most infamous traitor in Athenian history, but before achieving notoriety, Alcibiades was recognized as one of Athens’ most talented and ambitious youths. With great political aspirations in mind, Alcibiades is intercepted by Socrates before he can speak to the Athenian assembly. After talking with Socrates in the Alcibiades I, Alcibiades seems turned to a Socratic education, an education Socrates promises will aid Alcibiades in his political pursuits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Funeral Oration of Pericles
    Big Takeaway: Pericles Greatly expanded Athenian Democracy by allowing more men to vote!!! The Funeral Oration of Pericles The excerpt below is taken from Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War. The Ancient Greek historian Thucydides recorded a speech made by the Athenian leader Pericles in honor of those who died fighting Sparta in the first year of The Peloponnesian war (431 B.C). In the speech, Pericles describes the superior qualities of Athenian democracy as compared with life in Sparta. This speech is one of the most famous defenses of democracy of all time! “For our government (Athens’) is not copied from those of our neighbors; we are an example to them rather than they to us. Our constitution is called a democracy because it is in the hands not of the few but of the many! But our laws secure equal justice for all in their private disputes, and our public opinion welcomes and honors talent in every branch of achievement, not for any sectional reason but on grounds of excellence alone. And as we give free play to all in our public life, so we carry the same spirit into our daily relations with one another We are lovers of beauty without extravagance, and lovers of wisdom without unmanliness. Wealth to us is not mere material for vainglory but an opportunity for achievement; and poverty we think it no disgrace to acknowledge but a real degradation to make no effort to overcome. Our citizens attend both to public and private duties, and do not allow absorption in their own various affairs to interfere with their knowledge of the city’s.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download the Classical Art of Command Eight Greek Generals Who Shaped the History of Warfare 1St Edition Ebook, Epub
    THE CLASSICAL ART OF COMMAND EIGHT GREEK GENERALS WHO SHAPED THE HISTORY OF WARFARE 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Joseph Roisman | 9780199985821 | | | | | The Classical Art of Command Eight Greek Generals Who Shaped the History of Warfare 1st edition PDF Book As the Thebans were joined by many erstwhile Spartan allies, the Spartans were powerless to resist this invasion. The Lion at the Gates. The revenge of the Persians was postponed 10 years by internal conflicts in the Persian Empire, until Darius's son Xerxes returned to Greece in BC with a staggeringly large army modern estimates suggest between ,, men. Along with the rise of the city-states evolved a new style of warfare: the hoplite phalanx. The volume also looks at how the Greek art of command changed during the Classical Age, and how adaptable it was to different military challenges. The peace treaty which ended the Peloponnesian War left Sparta as the de facto ruler of Greece hegemon. After his assassination, this war was prosecuted by his son Alexander the Great , and resulted in the takeover of the whole Achaemenid Empire by the Macedonians. The second Persian invasion is famous for the battles of Thermopylae and Salamis. After they refused to disband their army, an army of approximately 10, Spartans and Pelopennesians marched north to challenge the Thebans. Following this victory, the Thebans first secured their power-base in Boeotia, before marching on Sparta. However, from the very beginning, it was clear that the Spartan hegemony was shaky; the Athenians, despite their crushing defeat, restored their democracy but just one year later, ejecting the Sparta-approved oligarchy.
    [Show full text]