FISH NAMES COMMITTEE The FRDC Standards Development Committee responsible for AS 5300

FNC 34 Minutes

Meeting Details

Date 4-5 September 2018 Venue The Shearwater Room CSIRO Marine Research Laboratories Castray Esplanade Hobart Tas 7000 Tour of CSIRO Fish A tour of the facilities was conducted by Al Graham Taxonomy Facilities commencing at 2:30 PM FRDC Reception A reception was held for FNC members and Aquatic Plant Names Workshop participants at the Vue Room, Port Office Hotel, Hobart commencing at 6:00 PM on 5 September 2018.

Contact Details CONTACTS

Alan Snow [email protected] 0418 199 516 Project Manager Gus Dannoun [email protected] 0419 528 733 Chair FNC Nicole Stubing [email protected] 0468 590 642 Alistair Graham [email protected]

Alan Snow Locked Bag 222 DIRECT 61 7 3390 6220 EMAIL [email protected] FNC Project Manager DEAKIN WEST ACT 2600 MOBILE 0418 199 516 WEB www.fishnames.com.au

FRDC IS ACCREDITED TO DEVELOP AUSTRALIAN STANDARDS FOR THE FISHING AND AQUACULTURE INDUSTRY

Meeting Minutes

1. OPENING OF MEETING ...... 4

1.1 ATTENDANCE AND APOLOGIES ...... 4

1.2 NOTIFICATION OF PROXY VOTES ...... 5

1.3 NOTIFICATION OF OBSERVERS ...... 5

1.4 FNC MEMBERS CODE OF CONDUCT ...... 5 2. FISH NAMES COMMITTEE ...... 5

2.1 FISH NAMES COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP AND REGISTER ...... 5 3. AGENDA AND MINUTES...... 6

3.1 ADOPTION OF AGENDA FOR THE MEETING ...... 6

3.2 ADOPTION OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS ...... 6

3.3 MINUTES AND AGENDA ON FISH NAMES COMMITTEE WEB SITE ...... 7 4. ISSUES RELATING TO FRDC AS THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION (NICOLE STUBING) ... 7

4.1 STANDARDS AUSTRALIA SURVEILLANCE AUDIT ...... 7

4.2 REPORT TO FRDC BOARD ...... 7

4.3 AUSTRALIAN STANDARD FOR AQUATIC PLANT NAMES ...... 7 5. STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURES ...... 8 6. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ANNEX A OF THE FISH NAMES STANDARD (AS 5300-2015) ...... 8

6.1 ACTIONS APPROVED SINCE PREVIOUS MEETING...... 8 6.1.1 Out of session approval for Application 309 to add a new species name Australian Scampi for Metanephrops australiensis...... 8

6.2 PRE-ASSESSMENT OF NEW APPLICATIONS ...... 9

6.3 APPLICATIONS FOR INITIAL EVALUATION ...... 9 6.3.1 Application 310 to add the SFN Pink -Striped Prawn for Aristeus virilis Spence Bate, 1881) ...... 10 6.3.2 Application 311 to add the name White Carid Prawn for Heterocarpus sibogae (de Man, 1907)11 6.3.3 Application 312 to add the name Red Carid Prawn for Heterocarpus woodmasoni Alcock, 190111 6.3.4 Additional emergent applications - Mantis Shrimp ...... 12 6.3.5 Additional emergent applications – Gooseneck Barnacles ...... 14

6.4 APPLICATIONS SUBJECT TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION ...... 15

6.5 APPLICATIONS SUBJECT TO FINAL FNC EVALUATION ...... 17 6.5.1 Application 293 to DELETE the group name BLACKTIP SHARKS which currently applies to Carcharhinus, Loxodon & Rhizoprionodon spp...... 19 6.5.2 Application 294 to add the group name BLACKTIP SHARKS to cover the three species Carcharhinus limbatus, Carcharhinus sorrah, & Carcharhinus tilstoni...... 20 6.5.3 Application 295 To add the SFN Longspined Sea Urchin for Centrostephanus rodgersii ...... 21 6.5.4 Application 296 To add the SFN Western Longspined Sea Urchin for Centrostephanus tenuispinus 22 6.5.5 Application 297 To add the SFN Needlespined Sea Urchin for Diadema setosum ...... 23

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 2 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

6.5.6 Application 298 To add the SFN Collector Sea Urchin for Tripneustes gratilla ...... 23 6.5.7 Application 299 To add the SFN Shortspined Sea Urchin for Heliocidaris erythrogramma ...... 24 6.5.8 Application 300 To add the SFN Red Sea Urchin for Heliocidaris tuberculata ...... 25 6.5.9 Application 301 To add the SFN Burrowing Sea Urchin for Echinometra mathaei ...... 25 6.5.10 Application 302 To add the SFN Kina for Evechinus chloroticus...... 26 6.5.11 Application 303 to add the name White Yabby for Cherax albidus Clark 1936i...... 27 6.5.12 Application 304 to add the name Margaret River Marron for Cherax tenuimanus (Smith, 1912) 28 6.5.13 Application 305 to add the name Blacklip Oyster for Saccostrea echinata (Quoy & Gaimard, 1835 29 6.5.14 Application 306 to add the name Rainbow Smelt for Osmerus mordax (Mitchill, 1814) ...... 31 6.5.15 Application 292 to add the SFN Rough Turban Shell for Lunella torquata (Gmelin, 1791)) ..... 32 6.5.16 Application 307 to add the name SFN Green Turban Shell for Turbo marmoratus Linnaeus, 1758 33 6.5.17 Application 308 to add the name SFN Smooth Turban Shell for Turbo imperialis Gmelin, 1791 34

6.6 PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE AUSTRALIAN FISH NAMES STANDARD ...... 35

6.7 EMERGENT ISSUES RAISED IN RELATION TO FISH NAMES ...... 35 6.7.1 Mud Crabs and Mud Crabs...... 35 7. SCIENTIFIC NAME UPDATES...... 37

7.1 CHANGES TO PACIFIC OYSTER ...... 37

7.2 CHANGES TO LETHRINUS SP IN CAAB ...... 38 8. FUTURE FISH NAMES WORK PROGRAM AND ACTIVITIES ...... 38

8.1 UPDATE ON THE PROGRESS OF FRDC PROJECT 2015-210...... 38 9. FUTURE FNC MEETINGS ...... 38 10. OTHER BUSINESS ...... 39

10.1 MEETING AT FRDC AND ISSUES RAISED ...... 39

10.2 BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS FOR THE FNC ...... 40

10.3 MEETING AT CSIRO WITH FRDC AND CSIRO ABOUT THE CAAB AND FISH NAMES DATABASE...... 41

10.4 APPOINTMENT OF DEPUTY CHAIR’ ...... 41

10.5 OTHER ISSUES FROM FNC MEMBERS ...... 41 11. CLOSE OF MEETING...... 42 12. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ...... 43

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 3 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

1. OPENING OF MEETING

1.1 Attendance and apologies VOTING MEMBERS Independent Chair Gus Dannoun Yes Australian Seafood Industry Vacant Appointee Fisheries Agencies nominee on Grant Pullen Yes behalf of Heather Brayford Department of Agriculture and Lisa McKenzie Yes Water Resources Fish Exports appointee CSIRO Fish Taxonomy appointee Karen Gowlett-Holmes Yes Recreational fishing appointee Russell Conway Yes Seafood Importers appointee Mark Boulter Yes MFMA appointee representing Kerry Strangas Yes Independent fish retailers

Expert Member (Major Hamish Allen Yes Supermarket) Expert Member (Fish Taxonomy) Gordon (Gus) Yearsley Yes Expert Member (Seafood Don Tuma Apology Marketing and Fish and Invertebrates Taxonomy) Expert Member (Seafood Anthony Mercer Yes Processors) Expert Member (Hospitality) Glenn Austin Yes Expert Member (Seafood Anni Conn Yes Marketing) OBSERVERS AND NON-VOTING MEMBERS SDO Representative Patrick Hone FRDC Yes SDO Representative Nicole Stubing Yes Observer Meaghan Dodd Yes

PROJECT MANAGER AND ADMINISTRATION FNC Project Manager Alan Snow Yes

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 4 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

The chair welcomed observers to the meeting. The chair noted that Don Tuma had fallen ill while in Hobart. FNC hoped that Don would have a speedy recovery.

1.2 Notification of proxy votes Section 10.6 of the FRDC Standards Development Procedure allows for FNC members to appoint a proxy for the meeting to ensure that the relevant stakeholder group is not disadvantaged. The options for appointing a proxy are: a) Appoint the chair of the meeting to carry the proxy vote; b) Appoint another person at the meeting to carry the proxy vote; c) Appoint another person with the appropriate skills and knowledge to participate on his/her behalf. The Project Manager advised that the proxy votes he had received were:  Jason Gibson has advised that Grant Pullen is the AFMF representative for this meeting  Don Tuma appointed Karen Gowlett-Holmes to hold his proxy for this meeting

Resolution 34.1. FNC noted the status of proxy votes received.

1.3 Notification of observers Observers are invited and welcomed to all FNC meetings and are invited to contribute to discussions but are not entitled to vote. Observers for this meeting were:  Meaghan Dodd – Intuitive Food Solutions  John Pogonoski CSIRO

Resolution 34.2. FNC noted and welcomed the attendance of observers to the meeting

1.4 FNC Members Code of Conduct As per the FRDC Standards Development policies and procedures, all FNC members are expected to have read and agree to abide with the Code of Conduct which was distributed as Attachment 2 All members are requested to have signed and returned the last page of the attached Code of Conduct to indicate their acceptance of the Code and willingness to abide by the Code.

Resolution 34.3. FNC members noted and agreed to abide by the SRB Members Code of Conduct. 2. FISH NAMES COMMITTEE

2.1 Fish Names Committee Membership and Register Section 11 of the Fish Names Committee Procedures specifies the Fish Names Committee (FNC) membership.

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 5 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Section 10.5 of the FRDC Standards Development Procedures determines that the SRB Register which was tabled as Attachment 3 The Project Manager reported on the following matters affecting the FNC and membership. 1) Simon Boag has indicated that he cannot continue to serve on the FNC due to work commitments. Jane Lovell from Seafood Industry Australia will be putting fromward a nomination for consideration by the FRDC. Discussions have been held with SIA and a replacement should be in place soon. A call for an Expression of interest was being sent out last week 2) Tanya Corcoran who has been assisting the FNC, particularly on matters relating to SDO activities has left FRDC. A new responsibility will be in place soon. 3) Nicole Stubing is now the FRDC Research Portfolio Manager responsible for the FNC and others standards development activities. FNC Members are asked to regularly review and update the current SRB Register-Fish Names including the skills matrix as appropriate. Which was distributed as Attachment 3.

Resolution 34.4. FNC members noted the status of the SRB Register - Fish Names and updated as appropriate 3. AGENDA AND MINUTES

3.1 Adoption of Agenda for the Meeting The agenda for this meeting was presented for adoption and amendment as required. FNC Members noted the sitting times for the meeting including a tour of the CSIRO facilities. And the function for FNC members and attendees at the Aquatic Plant Names Workshop on the evening of 5 September 2018. Additional agenda items were:

1. Appointment of a deputy chair for the FNC (Item 10.4)

2. Russell Conway asked for an item about an app for fish names to be included. (Item 10.5)

Resolution 34.5. FNC adopted the agenda for the meeting with agreed amendments.

3.2 Adoption of minutes from previous meetings The minutes from the FNC 33 teleconference hosted at the Sydney Fish Market on 8 May 2018 were distributed as Attachment 4 had been previously circulated and were presented for formal adoption. The Project Manager report was distributed as Attachment 5.

Resolution 34.6. FNC confirmed the minutes of the FNC 33 meeting held on 8 May 2018 as a true record.

Resolution 34.7. FNC noted the activity report from the Project Manager

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 6 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

3.3 Minutes and Agenda on Fish Names Committee web site A process has been put in place where the minutes from the last 4 meetings (2 years) will be listed on the Fish Names Committee area under the Seafood Standards web site. The web site can be found at http://seafoodstandards.com.au/fish-names/Pages/Fish- Names-Meetings.aspx It is intended that regular monthly stakeholder updates also be uploaded for public access. 4. ISSUES RELATING TO FRDC AS THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION (Nicole Stubing) FRDC is accredited as a standard setting body responsible for the Australian Fish Names Standard and other potential standards within its scope as an accredited SDO. The schedule for past and future Standards Australia audits is

2013 Initial accreditation audit by Standards Australia 2014 Surveillance Audit 2015 Surveillance Audit 2016 Re-accreditation audit 2017 Surveillance Audit 2018 Surveillance Audit 2019 Re-accreditation audit 2020 Surveillance Audit

Issues relating to FRDC’s scope of accreditation were listed here

4.1 Standards Australia Surveillance Audit A Standards Australia surveillance audit is scheduled for 26 September 2018. There are no outstanding issues that relate to the FNC that need to be resolved before this meeting.

4.2 Report to FRDC Board A briefing on FNC achievements for the past twelve months was sent to the FRDC Board. A copy is available for the interest of FNC Members and was distributed as Attachment 6.

4.3 Australian Standard for Aquatic Plant Names As reported at FNC 33, this standard is to be developed as a standard in its own right. The first aquatic plant names workshop was scheduled for 6 September 2018. The project manager gave a report on activities and said that Gordon Yearsley, Karen Gowlett-Holmes and Glenn Austin from the FNC would be participating in the workshop. The project manager said that activities from this group would not be reported at future FNC meetings as an SRB was to be formed similar to the FNC.

Resolution 34.8. FNC noted the report on FRDC Standards Development activities.

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 7 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

5. STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURES The Fish Names policies and procedures that guide the standards development activities of the FRDC are regularly reviewed to harmonise with existing FRDC quality procedures and to address any issues arising from Standards Australia audits.  FRDC Standards Development Policy that sets the overall policy direction for FRDC in its standards development activities;  FRDC Standards Development Procedure provides guidance on all standards development activities and applies to all Standards Reference Bodies including the FNC;  Fish Names Committee Procedures provides guidance to the FNC on additional procedures that relate to the FNC only. These documents are tabled for noting and comment. Please note that these documents replace previous versions.

Resolution 34.9. FNC asked that the Project Manager provide an update as to what has changed in the documents when there has been achange. 6. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ANNEX A OF THE FISH NAMES STANDARD (AS 5300-2015)

6.1 Actions approved since previous meeting Reference: Fish Names Committee Procedure Section 12.5 Where an urgent decision is needed, FNC members can approve decisions out of session and decisions are reported to the next meeting of the FNC. The Project Manager reported on all out of session decisions taken since the last meeting. (FNC 33).

6.1.1 Out of session approval for Application 309 to add a new species name Australian Scampi for Metanephrops australiensis. FNC was asked to make two out of session decisions 1. FNC supports Application 309 to add a new species name Australian Scampi for Metanephrops australiensis.to proceed to public consultation 2. FNC agrees that Application 309 to add a new species name Australian Scampi for Metanephrops australiensis is non-contentious and grants provisional approval for the use of the name. Voting was conducted using email to FNC voting members Results of out of session voting were: Question Yes No FNC supports Application 309 to add a new species name Australian Scampi 12 0 for Metanephrops australiensis.to proceed to public consultation

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 8 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

FNC agrees that Application 309 to add a new species name Australian 12 0 Scampi for Metanephrops australiensis is non-contentious and grants provisional approval for the use of the name.

FNC therefore unanimously approved both resolutions. The applicant and Lisa McKenzie at Department of Agriculture and Water Resources were advised of the FNC decision on 4 June 2018. This proposed name will be subjected to public consultation along with the decisions of this meeting. The documents presented at the meeting were:  Attachment 10: - App 309 Metanephrops australiensis Application  Attachment 11 - App 309 Metanephrops australiensis Provisional approval

Resolution 34.10. FNC noted that Application 309 to add a new species name Australian Scampi for Metanephrops australiensis was approved to proceed to public consultation

Resolution 34.11. FNC noted that Application 309 to add a new species name Australian Scampi for Metanephrops australiensis was deemed to be non- contentious and granted provisional approval for the use of the name.

6.2 Pre-assessment of new applications Reference: Fish Names Committee Procedure Section 12.2 The pre-assessment will essentially determine: I. Whether the application has addressed the required criteria II. Whether the name already exists. III. Any other information required that will assist the FNC in its determinations. All new applications have been either prepared by the Project Manager or verified to ensure that they meet the criteria.

6.3 Applications for initial evaluation Reference: Fish Names Committee Procedure Section 12.3  Applications that are the subject of an initial evaluation are assessed by the FNC as to how they meet the criteria.  The applications can be amended at this stage by the FNC.  A “simple majority” is only needed for an application to proceed to Public Consultation and subsequent Final Evaluation. There are three recommendations arising from an application to Department of Agriculture to export the species. FNC was asked to consider 1. The proposed name 2. Whether to grant provisional approval

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 9 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Application CAAB Code Application Scientific Name Authority No 310 28 712003 To add the SFN Pink Striped Aristeus virilis Spence Bate, 1881) Prawn 311 28 770005 To add the name White Heterocarpus De Man, 1917 Carid Prawn sibogae 312 28 770007 To add the name Red Carid Heterocarpus Alcock, 1901 Prawn woodmasoni

CAAB Code Standard Fish Name Scientific Name Authority PRAWNS - Aristeidae 28 712001 Red Prawn Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Risso, 1827) 28 712003 Pink Striped Prawn (App Aristeus virilis Spence Bate, 1881) 310) 28 712008 Giant Scarlet Prawn Aristaeopsis edwardsiana (Johnson, 1867) PRAWNS - Solenoceridae 28 714005 Royal Red Prawn Haliporoides sibogae (de Man, 1907) PRAWNS - Sergestidae 28 720015 Pygmy Prawn Acetes sibogae Hansen, 1919 FRESHWATER PRAWNS - Palaemonidae 28 756901 FRESHWATER PRAWN Macrobrachium spp PRAWNS - Pandalidae (pandalid shrimps) 28 770005 White Carid Prawn (App Heterocarpus sibogae De Man, 1917 311) 28 770007 Red Carid Prawn (App 312) Heterocarpus woodmasoni Alcock, 1901

Proposed New Entry Delete entry

6.3.1 Application 310 to add the SFN Pink -Striped Prawn for Aristeus virilis Spence Bate, 1881) Attachment 12 - App 310 Aristeus virilis Application This is one of three recommendations arising from an application to Department of Agriculture to export the species. Karen Gowlett-Holmes has made the following observations:  Aristeus virilis – CAAB currently has red striped prawn as the common name with Pink Striped Prawn as an alternative – we can easily change this if it is preferred by industry.

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 10 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Resolution 34.12. FNC supported Application 310 to add the SFN Pink Striped Prawn for Aristeus virilis to proceed to public consultation

Resolution 34.13. FNC agreed that Application 310 to add the SFN Pink-striped Prawn for Aristeus virilis is non-contentious and gives provisional approval for the use of the name.

6.3.2 Application 311 to add the name White Carid Prawn for Heterocarpus sibogae (de Man, 1907) Attachment 13 - App 311 Heterocarpus sibogae Application This was the second of three recommendations arising from an application to Department of Agriculture to export the species. Karen Gowlett-Holmes made the following observations:  Heterocarpus – common names in this genus are poorly defined so there would be no problem with defining these two species as requested and leaving the rest undefined at present. It is possible that these two common names are currently used for more than one species each.  As well, a decision that will need to be made is if we are going to use “carid” or “carid prawn” (or “carid shrimp”) for these animals – once we set this we will need to be consistent.  A rough guide is that in Australia, we have generally called penaeoid animals’ “prawns” and carid animals “shrimps”, whereas in many other parts of the world they are all called “shrimps”. Most of our commercial prawns are shallow water penaeoids, however once we get into the Deepwater animals, then we are dealing with quite a few carids as well.

Resolution 34.14. FNC agreed that the standard name Carid Prawn would be used in all instances in the future.

Resolution 34.15. FNC supported Application 311 to add the name White Carid Prawn for Heterocarpus sibogae to proceed to public consultation

Resolution 34.16. FNC agreed that Application 311 to add the name White Carid Prawn for Heterocarpus sibogae is non-contentious and gave provisional approval for the use of the name.

6.3.3 Application 312 to add the name Red Carid Prawn for Heterocarpus woodmasoni Alcock, 1901 Attachment 14 - App 312 Heterocarpus woodmasoni Application This is the third of three recommendations arising from an application to Department of Agriculture to export the species.

Resolution 34.17. FNC supported Application 312 to add the name Red Carid Prawn for Heterocarpus woodmasoni Alcock, 1901to proceed to public consultation.

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 11 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Resolution 34.18. FNC agreed that Application 312 to add the name Red Carid Prawn for Heterocarpus woodmasoni is non-contentious and gives provisional approval for the use of the name..

6.3.4 Additional emergent applications - Mantis Shrimp Background The Project Manager was contacted by Fish Exports, Department of Agriculture and Water Resources regarding the possible addition of the species Mantis Shrimp to the AFNS. The company did not seem to be sure of the actual species they were harvesting, so it may be worth considering adding a group name for the Stomatopoda at this stage instead of trying to define them at species, genus or even family level. The relevant entries in CAAB are: 28 030000 Order Stomatopoda - undifferentiated MANTIS SHRIMPS 28 031000 Bathysquillidae - undifferentiated 28 033000 Erythrosquillidae - undifferentiated 28 034000 Alainosquillidae - undifferentiated 28 035000 Eurysquillidae - undifferentiated 28 036000 Gonodactylidae - undifferentiated 28 037000 Hemisquillidae - undifferentiated 28 038000 Odontodactylidae - undifferentiated 28 039000 Protosquillidae - undifferentiated 28 040000 Pseudosquillidae - undifferentiated 28 041000 Takuidae - undifferentiated 28 045000 Coronididae - undifferentiated 28 046000 Lysiosquillidae - undifferentiated 28 047000 Nannosquillidae - undifferentiated 28 048000 Tetrasquillidae - undifferentiated 28 049000 Parasquillidae - undifferentiated 28 051000 Squillidae - undifferentiated

Don Tuma made the following observations and comments for inclusion Prior to about 1980 mantis shrimps were rarely marketed commercially in Australia, but an ensuing period of increased emigration to Australia from Southeast Asia, particularly Vietnam, resulted in a more cosmopolitan attendance at seafood auctions here. As a consequence, certain species of mantis shrimp belonging to three stomatopod families Squillidae, Lysiosquillidae and Odontodactylidae were consigned regularly to the Brisbane Fish Market facilities at Colmslie, Qld in commercial quantities. Nine species made up the undifferentiated consignments I inspected during three years of attendance at the Brisbane auctions. These taxa are listed below according to their family.

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 12 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

I’m pleased to find that other mantis shrimp species (Belosquilla laevis) are also bycatch of prawn trawl fisheries. These animals have been neglected from marketing records for a very long time as being ‘unworthy’ as items of seafood in the dietary regimes of western cultures. The attachment herewith involves another mantis shrimp that I excluded from my list of nine Qld commercial species as it rarely occurred among the consignments of undifferentiated species. I suspect that it is rather more common than appears – probably due to its association with hard sea beds often avoided by trawl fishers. Perhaps it should be included as a representative of a fourth family – Gonodactylidae – as a measure of compensation for biased beliefs regarding the edibility of these animals. 28 051000 Squillidae - undifferentiated 28 051033 Erugosquilla woodmasoni (Kemp, 1911) Woodmason’s Mantis Shrimp 28 051036 Harpiosquilla harpax (de Haan, 1844) Rapacious Mantis Shrimp 28 051039 Harpiosquilla stephensoni Manning, Giant Mantis Shrimp 1969 28 051052 Oratosquillina interrupta (Kemp, 1911) Blackspot Mantis Shrimp 28 051054 Oratosquillina quinquedentata (Brooks, Fivetooth Mantis Shrimp 1886) 28 051003 Belosquilla laevis (Hess, 1865) Smooth Mantis Shrimp 28 051055 Oratosquillina stephensoni (Manning, Stephenson’s Mantis 1978) Shrimp 28 046000 Lysiosquillidae - undifferentiated 28 046005 Lysiosquillina maculata (Fabricius, Striped Mantis Shrimp 1793) 28 038000 Odontodactylidae - undifferentiated 28 038001 Odontodactylus cultrifer (White, 1851) Keeled Mantis Shrimp 28 038002 Odontodactylus japonicus (de Haan, Japanese Mantis Shrimp 1844) 28 036000 Gonodactylidae - undifferentiated 28 036018 Gonodactylus chiragra (Fabricius, 1781) Clubfoot Mantis Shrimp

All the above species are intended for publication as life-size colour images in ‘Southern Seafood – A guide to shellfish of Oceania’ and offer only a partial representation of edible stomatopods of that region. FNC was asked to discuss the proposal and to make recommendations as to proposed names and applications to amend the AFNS. The proposed amendments will then be prepared and subjected to FNC for out-of-session initial approval.

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 13 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Resolution 34.19. FNC supported Application 313 to add a new group name Mantis Shrimp for Order Stomatopoda - undifferentiated and requested the project manager to prepare an application for out-of-session approval.

Resolution 34.20. FNC agreed that Application 313 to add a new group name Mantis Shrimp for Order Stomatopoda - undifferentiated is non-contentious and gives provisional approval for the use of the name.

Resolution 34.21. FNC requested the Project Manager to prepare the following applications for out of session approval by the FNC and public consultation.

Application CAAB Code Proposed Name Scientific Name Authority No 314 28 051033 Woodmason’s Mantis Erugosquilla ) (Kemp, 1911) Shrimp woodmasoni 315 28 051036 Rapacious Mantis Shrimp Harpiosquilla (de Haan, 1844) harpax 316 28 051039 Giant Mantis Shrimp Harpiosquilla Manning, 1969 stephensoni 317 28 051052 Blackspot Mantis Shrimp Oratosquillina (Kemp, 1911) interrupta 318 28 051054 Fivetooth Mantis Shrimp Oratosquillina (Brooks, 1886) quinquedentata 319 28 051003 Smooth Mantis Shrimp Belosquilla laevis (Hess, 1865) 320 28 051055 Stephenson’s Mantis Oratosquillina (Manning, 1978) Shrimp stephensoni 321 28 046005 Striped Mantis Shrimp Lysiosquillina (Fabricius, 1793) maculata 322 28 038001 Keeled Mantis Shrimp Odontodactylus (White, 1851) cultrifer 323 28 038002 Japanese Mantis Shrimp Odontodactylus (de Haan, 1844) japonicus 324 28 036018 Clubfoot Mantis Shrimp Gonodactylus (Fabricius, 1781) chiragra

6.3.5 Additional emergent applications – Gooseneck Barnacles Background Advice of another application has been received that may need to be considered. No application has been prepared yet to allow discussion by FNC Karen Gowlett-Holmes made the following observations.

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 14 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

in Australia we have 8 species of Lepas, all pelagic, and mostly widespread. The two most common species, Lepas anatifera and Lepas anserifera, are circum-Australia, common, and very similar – they are also often found together. Goose Barnacle and Gooseneck Barnacle are interchangeable names used for the whole group. Percebes is the Spanish name for a specific species, Pollicipes pollicipes, found in Spain and Portugal, and has been applied to other members of the same genus when imported into those countries, but not to Lepas species. Wikipedia has some details. I would recommend going with a group name here rather than such a generic name for a specific species. I do not think we should even mention Percebes, as Pollicipes are in a completely different family not found in Australia.

27 528000 Lepadidae - undifferentiated 27 528904 Lepas spp GOOSENECK BARNACLES 27 528001 Lepas (Anatifa) anatifera 27 528002 Lepas (Anatifa) anserifera 27 528004 Lepas (Anatifa) australis 27 528009 Lepas (Anatifa) hillii 27 528014 Lepas (Anatifa) indica 27 528013 Lepas (Nonfurcata) nonfurcata 27 528003 Lepas (Anatifa) pectinata 27 528010 Lepas (Anatifa) testudinata 27 528902 Conchoderma spp. 27 528903 Dosima spp. 27 528005 Conchoderma auritum 27 528006 Conchoderma chelonophilum 27 528008 Conchoderma virgatum 27 528011 Dosima fascicularis

Resolution 34.22. FNC supported Application 325 to add a new group name GOOSENECK BARNACLES for: Lepas spp and requested the project manager to prepare an application for out-of-session approval.

6.4 Applications subject to public consultation Reference: Fish Names Committee Procedure Section 12.4 Attachment 15 - Excel spreadsheet of data Attachment 16 - Full download file of all responses Discussion

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 15 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

The Project Manager reported that key aspects of the public consultation strategy adopted were:

No of applications subjected to Public 17 consultation Date commenced 24 May 2018 Date completed 22 August 2018 Distribution strategy Sent to FNC members to on-forward On a number of occasions Sent to my contact list 300 Listed on FRDC Facebook Page with links 7645 No of responses 26 Comments received through public consultation 1) Drawing these changes to the attention of stakeholders and calling for comments, through the SFN process is greatly appreciated. Thank you. 2) Stop retailer's from using misleading names like Bassa 3) I wish the Australian Fish Names Committee to know how strongly I endorse the continued use of capital letters for the common names of all animals, including those dealt with by this committee (i.e., recognising that these names constitute proper nouns). There is a trend these days to drop them down to lower case, but this is wrong and it can be confusing. 4) I note that all the gastropods have the word “shell” as part of their common name, but this usage is long past its use-by date in terms of popular comprehension and conservation ethos. Using just “shell” fails to indicate to the average person that these shells are the product of a living animal. So, these days the word “snail” is very widely used to indicate a gastropod [and using parallel logic “clam” for bivalves other than mussels, oysters and scallops]. As I say, these days the words “snail” and “clam” are well understood by the general public and very widespread. 5) I would like to protest the use of the name "salmon" for the Australian white fleshed fish vs the Atlantic/Pacific salmon which are pink fleshed. Because fish sellers, especially at markets are selling fish as "wild caught King salmon" ie white fleshed Threadfin salmon when the consumer thinks they are getting pink fleshed wild caught (in Australia) Pacific King salmon. The Australian consumer- and I suspect some sellers- have no understanding that there are no wild caught Australian Pacific/Atlantic salmon. I have massive animated discussions at our local markets with the sellers who just don't get it. And lo and behold they sell out of that product long before their farmed NZ King Salmon- which actually is King Salmon.

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 16 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Proposed amendments subject to public consultation Group 1 Blacktip Shark  Application 293 to DELETE the group name BLACKTIP SHARKS for Carcharhinus, Loxodon & Rhizoprionodon spp  Application 294 to ADD the group name BLACKTIP SHARKS for Carcharhinus limbatus, Carcharhinus sorrah, & Carcharhinus tilstoni. Group 2 Sea Urchins  Application 295 to add the SFN Longspined Sea Urchin Centrostephanus rodgersii  Application 296 to add the SFN Western Longspined Sea Urchin for Centros tephanus tenuispinus  Application 297 to add the SFN Needlespined Sea Urchin for Diadema setosum  Application 298 to add the SFN Collector Sea Urchin for Tripneustes gratilla  Application 299 to add the SFN Shortspined Sea Urchin for Heliocidaris erythrogramma  Application 300 to add the SFN Red Sea Urchin for Heliocidaris tuberculata  Application 301 to add the SFN Burrowing Sea Urchin for Echinometra mathaei  Application 302 to add the SFN Kina for Evechinus chloroticus Group 3 Yabbies  Application 303 to add the SFN White Yabby for Cherax albidus  Application 304 to add the SFN Margaret River Marron for Cherax tenuimanus Group 4 Blacklip Oyster  Application 305 to add the SFN Blacklip Oyster for Saccostrea echinata Group 5 Rainbow Smelt (Imp)  Application 306 to add the SFN Rainbow smelt for Osmerus mordax Group 6 Turban Shells or Periwinkles  Application 292 to add the SFN Rough Turban Shell for Lunella torquata (Gmelin, 1791)  Application 307 to add the SFN Green Turban Shell for Turbo marmoratus Linnaeus, 1758  Application 308 to add the SFN Smooth Turban Shell for Turbo imperialis Gmelin, 1791

Resolution 34.23. FNC agreed that the requirements for public consultation have been met and agreed that the strategy for conducting public consultation has been effective.

6.5 Applications subject to final FNC evaluation Reference: Fish Names Committee Procedure Section 12.5 Discussion The purpose of the final FNC evaluation is to determine whether or not the fish name proposal is approved. The FNC minutes must record: 1) A voting summary (the minutes will not record how individual members voted but this information will be captured and retained in a secure file) 2) all salient points supporting the decision 3) any special circumstances relating to the decision 4) if the application is rejected, the specific reasons why and importantly, which of the fish names protocols the proposed SFN was so seriously in conflict with that it was not approved.

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 17 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

There are currently 17 applications that have been subjected to public consultation. Voting on final evaluations is required to be completed on the FNC Members Voting Form. Which was distributed as Attachment 17. Consensus is required as specified in the Standards Development Procedure – Demonstrating Consensus FNC Action FNC to assess the following applications based on the criteria and feedback received through public consultation.

Application CAAB Code Application Scientific Name No 293 37 018901 To DELETE the group name BLACKTIP Carcharhinus, Loxodon & SHARKS Rhizoprionodon spp 294 To ADD the group name BLACKTIP Carcharhinus limbatus, SHARKS Carcharhinus sorrah, & Carcharhinus tilstoni. 295 25 211001 To add the SFN Longspined Sea Urchin Centrostephanus rodgersii 296 25 211002 To add the SFN Western Longspined Sea Centrostephanus tenuispinus Urchin 297 25 211009 To add the SFN Needlespined Sea Urchin Diadema setosum 298 25 242011 To add the SFN Collector Sea Urchin Tripneustes gratilla 299 25 247001 To add the SFN Shortspined Sea Urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma 300 25 247002 To add the SFN Red Sea Urchin Heliocidaris tuberculata 301 25 247003 To add the SFN Burrowing Sea Urchin Echinometra mathaei 302 25 247009 To add the SFN Kina Evechinus chloroticus 303 28 795001 To add the SFN White Yabby Cherax albidus 304 28 795126 To add the SFN Margaret River Marron Cherax tenuimanus 305 23 257007 To add the SFN Blacklip Oyster Saccostrea echinata 306 To add the SFN Rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax 292 24 045003 To add the SFN Rough Turban Shell Lunella torquata (Gmelin, 1791) 307 24 045001 To add the SFN Green Turban Shell Turbo marmoratus Linnaeus, 1758 308 24 045002 To add the SFN Smooth Turban Shell Turbo imperialis Gmelin, 1791

GROUP 1 BLACKTIP SHARK PROPOSED AMENDMENTS There were two recommendations arising from the Status of Australian Fish Stocks (SAFS working group. CAAB Code Standard Fish Name Scientific Name Authority WHALER SHARKS — Carcharhinidae

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 18 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

CAAB Code Standard Fish Name Scientific Name Authority 37 018901 BLACKTIP SHARKS Carcharhinus, Loxodon & Rhizoprionodon spp (App 293) BLACKTIP SHARKS Carcharhinus limbatus, Carcharhinus sorrah, & (App 294) Carcharhinus tilstoni. 37 018039 Common Blacktip Shark Carcharhinus limbatus (Müller & Henle, 1839) 37 018013 Spot-Tail Shark Carcharhinus sorrah (Müller & Henle, 1839) 37 018014 Australian Blacktip Shark Carcharhinus tilstoni (Whitley, 1950)

Proposed New Entry Delete entry

6.5.1 Application 293 to DELETE the group name BLACKTIP SHARKS which currently applies to Carcharhinus, Loxodon & Rhizoprionodon spp Attachment 18 - App 293 delete Blacktip Sharks Application Application 293 to DELETE the group name BLACKTIP SHARKS which currently applies to Carcharhinus, Loxodon & Rhizoprionodon spp No responded to 26 stakeholder feedback No responded to Blacktip 12 Sharks group Yes 12

No 0

No comment on this 0 application Provided further 1 information Comments This change makes perfect sense as I would not consider either Loxodon & Rhizoprionodon spp to be a Blacktip compared with Carcharhinus limbatus, Carcharhinus sorrah, & Carcharhinus tilstoni which I believe are more suited to hold the "Blacktip" name

Resolution 34.24. FNC supported Application 293 to amend the AFNS by DELETING the group name BLACKTIP SHARKS which currently applies to Carcharhinus, Loxodon & Rhizoprionodon spp

For 12 Against 0 Abstain 1

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 19 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

6.5.2 Application 294 to add the group name BLACKTIP SHARKS to cover the three species Carcharhinus limbatus, Carcharhinus sorrah, & Carcharhinus tilstoni. Attachment 19 - App 294 revised Blacktip Sharks group Application

APPLICATION 294 TO ADD THE GROUP NAME BLACKTIP SHARKS TO COVER THE THREE SPECIES CARCHARHINUS LIMBATUS, CARCHARHINUS SORRAH, & CARCHARHINUS TILSTONI.

No responded to 26 stakeholder feedback No responded to Blacktip 13 Sharks group Yes 13 No 0

No comment on this 1

application Provided further 1 information Comments This change makes perfect sense as I would not consider either Loxodon & Rhizoprionodon spp to be a Blacktip compared with Carcharhinus limbatus, Carcharhinus sorrah, & Carcharhinus tilstoni which I believe are more suited to hold the "Blacktip" name

Resolution 34.25. FNC supported Application 294 to amend the AFNS by ADDING the group name BLACKTIP SHARKS to cover the three species Carcharhinus limbatus, Carcharhinus sorrah, & Carcharhinus tilstoni.

For 12 Against 0 Abstain 1

GROUP 2 SEA URCHIN PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The issue of Standard Fish Names for Yabbies’ and Sea Urchins was raised at FNC 32. A working group comprising Karen Gowlett-Holmes, Lisa McKenzie, Don Tuma, and Alan Snow was formed to provide recommendations to FNC as to appropriate standard fish names. A set of 8 proposed names for Sea Urchin species is listed for consideration by FNC 34. A-1 Invertebrates – Jellyfishes, Sea Urchins and Sea Cucumbers CAAB Code Standard Fish Name Scientific Name Authority ECHINODERMS - Class Echinoidea 25 200000 SEA URCHIN Class Echinoidea - undifferentiated

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 20 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

CAAB Code Standard Fish Name Scientific Name Authority 25 211001 Longspined Sea Urchin Centrostephanus (A. Agassiz, 1863) rodgersii (App 295) 25 211002 Western Longspined Sea Centrostephanus H.L. Clark, 1914 Urchin (App 296) tenuispinus 25 211009 Needle Spine Sea Urchin Diadema setosum (Leske, 1778) (App 297) 25 242011 Collector Sea Urchin Tripneustes gratilla (Linnaeus, 1758) (App 298) 25 247001 Purple Sea Urchin / Heliocidaris (Valenciennes, 1846) Shortspined Sea Urchin / erythrogramma Variegated Sea Urchin (App 299) 25 247002 Black Sea Urchin Heliocidaris (Lamarck, 1816) tuberculata Red Sea Urchin (App 300) 25 247003 Burrowing Sea Urchin Echinometra mathaei (Blainville, 1825) (App 301) New Zealand Kina or Evechinus chloroticus (Valenciennes, 1846) Chatham Island Sea Urchin (App 302)

Proposed New Entry Proposed amendment to an existing entry

6.5.3 Application 295 To add the SFN Longspined Sea Urchin for Centrostephanus rodgersii Attachment 20 - App 295 Centrostephanus rodgersii Application Application 295 To add the SFN Longspined Sea Urchin for Centrostephanus rodgersii No responded to stakeholder 26 feedback No responded to Sea Urchins 10 Group Yes 7 No 0

No comment on this 1

application

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 21 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

More appropriate Name 2 Provided further information 2 Comments  Centrostephanus rodgersii has been fished and marketed in NSW, and elsewhere on the Australian east coast, under the name of 'Black or Purple Sea Urchin'. Moreover, Commercial Fishers, Researchers and Fisheries Managers commonly refer to this species as 'Black Urchins', due to their obviously black appearance (or very dark purple). I suggest naming this species 'Longspined Sea Urchin' would eventually be adopted by these groups, however, Application 300 (I note that the e-mail provided by Dr Alan Snow (24 May 2018, time 15:48) listed "Application 300 to add the SFN Black Sea Urchin for Heliocidaris tuberculata", yet below I see Application 300 lists the SFN as 'Red' NOT 'Black' ...Sea Urchin'). If 'Black' this will cause persistent and long-term confusion among user groups as to what species is being referred to, if the name 'Black Sea Urchin' is adopted for H. turberculata.  I recommend adopting the name 'Black Sea Urchin' for C. rosgersii and 'Red Sea Urchin' for H. turberculata (given that it's appearance is much more obviously red than black, particularly when compared with C. rosgersii).  Spiked Urchin as a preferred name

Feedback received by email In relation to the long spined sea urchin, we may have some concerns using the name with a colour (ie black) as this does get confusing and purple seems to be sued for different species. However, we would probably need to confirm with industry what their marketing preference is.

Resolution 34.26. FNC supported Application 295 to amend the AFNS by adding the SFN Longspined Sea Urchin for Centrostephanus rodgersii

For 13 Against 0 Abstain 0

6.5.4 Application 296 To add the SFN Western Longspined Sea Urchin for Centrostephanus tenuispinus Attachment 21 - App 296 Centrostephanus tenuispinus Application Application 296 To add the SFN Western Longspined Sea Urchin for Centrostephanus tenuispinus No responded to 26 stakeholder feedback No responded to Sea 10 Urchins Group Yes 8

No 0

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 22 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

No comment on this 2 application More appropriate Name 0 Provided further 0 information Comments

Resolution 34.27. FNC supported Application 296 to amend the AFNS by adding the SFN Western Longspined Sea Urchin for Centrostephanus tenuispinus.

For 13 Against 0 Abstain 0

6.5.5 Application 297 To add the SFN Needlespined Sea Urchin for Diadema setosum Attachment 22 - App 297 Diadema setosum Application Application 297 To add the SFN Needlespined Sea Urchin for Diadema setosum No responded to 26 stakeholder feedback No responded to Sea Urchins 10 Group Yes 8 No 0 No comment on this 2 application More appropriate Name 0 Provided further information 0 Comments

Resolution 34.28. FNC supported Application 297 to amend the AFNS by adding the SFN Needlespined Sea Urchin for Diadema setosum.

For 13 Against 0 Abstain 0

6.5.6 Application 298 To add the SFN Collector Sea Urchin for Tripneustes gratilla Attachment 23 - App 298 Tripneustes gratilla Application

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 23 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Application 298 To add the SFN Collector Sea Urchin for Tripneustes gratilla No responded to stakeholder 26 feedback No responded to Sea Urchins 10 Group Yes 8 No 0 No comment on this 2 application

More appropriate Name 0 Provided further information 0 Comments

Resolution 34.29. FNC supported Application 298 to amend the AFNS by adding the SFN Collector Sea Urchin for Tripneustes gratilla.

For 13 Against 0 Abstain 0

6.5.7 Application 299 To add the SFN Shortspined Sea Urchin for Heliocidaris erythrogramma Attachment 24 - App 299 Heliocidaris erythrogramma Application Application 299 To add the SFN Shortspined Sea Urchin for Heliocidaris erythrogramma No responded to 26 stakeholder feedback No responded to Sea 10 Urchins Group Yes 8

No 0 No comment on this 1 application More appropriate Name 1 Provided further 0 information Comments Violet Urchin is a preferred name

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 24 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Resolution 34.30. FNC supported Application 299 to amend the AFNS by adding the SFN Shortspined Sea Urchin for Heliocidaris erythrogramma..

For 13 Against 0 Abstain 0

6.5.8 Application 300 To add the SFN Red Sea Urchin for Heliocidaris tuberculata Attachment 25 - App 300 Heliocidaris tuberculata Application Application 300 To add the SFN Red Sea Urchin for Heliocidaris tuberculata No responded to 26 stakeholder feedback No responded to Sea 10 Urchins Group Yes 8 No 0 No comment on this 1 application More appropriate Name 1 Provided further 0 information Comments  I note that the e-mail provided by Dr Alan Snow (24 May 2018, time 15:48) listed "Application 300 to add the SFN Black Sea Urchin for Heliocidaris tuberculata", whereas the title above for Application 300 indicates 'Red Sea Urchin'.  If the application is indeed for 'Red Sea Urchin' I strongly support it. If it is for 'Black Sea Urchin' I strongly DO NOT support it - and would refer you to comments provided for Application 295 - i.e. change SFN from 'Longspined...' to 'Black...'

Resolution 34.31. FNC supported Application 300 to amend the AFNS by adding the SFN Red Sea Urchin for Heliocidaris tuberculate

For 13 Against 0 Abstain 0

6.5.9 Application 301 To add the SFN Burrowing Sea Urchin for Echinometra mathaei Attachment 26 - App 301 Echinometra mathaei Application Application 301 To add the SFN Burrowing Sea Urchin for Echinometra mathaei No responded to 26 stakeholder feedback

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 25 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

No responded to Sea 10 Urchins Group Yes 8 No 0 No comment on this 2 application More appropriate Name 0 Provided further 0 information Comments

Resolution 34.32. FNC supported Application 301 to amend the AFNS by adding the SFN Burrowing Sea Urchin for Echinometra mathaei

For 13 Against 0 Abstain 0

6.5.10 Application 302 To add the SFN Kina for Evechinus chloroticus Attachment 27 - App 302 Evechinus chloroticus Application Application 302 To add the SFN Kina for Evechinus chloroticus No responded to stakeholder 26 feedback No responded to Sea Urchins 10 Group Yes 6 No 2

No comment on this 2 application More appropriate Name 0 Provided further information 2

Comments

 Kina is a common name for sea urchins in New Zealand in the same sense that Uni is a common name for sea urchins in Japan and could cause confusion.  Kina is the common name for sea urchins in New Zealand. It has also been used as the marketing name for Centrostephanus rogersii for more than 20 years by urchin divers in the Eastern Victorian fishery

Resolution 34.33. FNC supported Application 302 to amend the AFNS by adding the SFN Kina for Evechinus chloroticus

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 26 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

For 13 Against 0 Abstain 0

GROUP 3 YABBY PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The issue of Standard Fish Names for Yabbies’ and Sea Urchins was raised at FNC 32. A working group comprising Karen Gowlett-Holmes, Lisa McKenzie, Don Tuma, and Alan Snow was formed to provide recommendations to FNC as to appropriate standard fish names. A set of 2 proposed names for Yabby species were listed for consideration by FNC 34.

CAAB Code Standard Fish Name Scientific Name Authority FRESHWATER CRAYFISH & YABBIES - Parastacidae 28 795901 YABBY Cherax spp except C. quadricarinatus, C. cainii & C. tenuimanus 28 795007 Marron Cherax cainii Austin, 2002 28 795001 White Yabby (App 303) Cherax albidus Clark 1936 28 795004 Redclaw Cherax quadricarinatus (von Martens, 1868) 28 795126 Margaret River Marron Cherax tenuimanus (Smith, 1912) (App 304)

Proposed New Entry Proposed amendment to an existing entry

6.5.11 Application 303 to add the name White Yabby for Cherax albidus Clark 1936i Attachment 28 - App 303 Cherax albidus Application Application 303 to add the name White Yabby for Cherax albidus Clark 1936i No responded to stakeholder 26 feedback No responded to Yabby 10 Group Yes 8 No 1 No comment on this 1 application More appropriate Name 0 Provided further information 1 Comments

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 27 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

 Good choice Grant Pullen reported that Western Australia did not support the name White Yabby and had been directed to vote against the proposal

Resolution 34.34. FNC supported Application 303 to amend the AFNS by adding the name White Yabby for Cherax albidus Clark 1936i

For 12 Against 1 Abstain 0

6.5.12 Application 304 to add the name Margaret River Marron for Cherax tenuimanus (Smith, 1912) Attachment 29 - App 304 Cherax tenuimanus Application Application 304 to add the name Margaret River Marron for Cherax tenuimanus (Smith, 1912) No responded to stakeholder 26 feedback No responded to Yabby 10 Group Yes 9 No 0

No comment on this 1 application More appropriate Name 0 Provided further information 0 Comments  Good choice

Grant Pullen put forward a submission from Western Australia that the name be amended to Margaret River Hairy Marron which would be acceptable. FNC accepted the amendment.

Resolution 34.35. FNC supported Application 304 to amend the AFNS by adding the name Margaret River Hairy Marron for Cherax tenuimanus (Smith, 1912)

For 12 Against 1 Abstain 0

GROUP 4 BLACKLIP OYSTER PROPOSED AMENDMENTS CAAB Code Standard Fish Name Scientific Name Authority PEARL OYSTERS – Pteriidae

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 28 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

CAAB Code Standard Fish Name Scientific Name Authority 23 236000 PEARL OYSTER (S) Pteriidae - undifferentiated 23 236001 Pale Pearl Oyster Pinctada albina (Lamarck, 1819) 23 236002 Blacklip Pearl Oyster Pinctada margaritifera (Linnaeus, 1758) 23 236003 Silverlip Pearl Oyster Pinctada maxima (Jameson, 1901) 23 236901 PEARL OYSTER Pinctada spp 23 236004 Penguin Wing Oyster Pteria penguin (Röding, 1798) 23 236902 WING PEARL OYSTERS Pteria spp OYSTERS – Ostreidae 23 255901 OYSTER Ostreidae & Pteriidae spp 23 257001 Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793) (Magallana gigas) 23 257002 Native Oyster Ostrea angasi G.B. Sowerby II, 1871 23 257006 Sydney Rock Oyster Saccostrea glomerata (Gould, 1850) 23 257007 Blacklip Oyster Saccostrea echinata (Quoy & Gaimard, 1835) (App 305)

Proposed New Entry Proposed amendment to an existing entry

6.5.13 Application 305 to add the name Blacklip Oyster for Saccostrea echinata (Quoy & Gaimard, 1835 Attachment 30 - App 305 Saccostrea echinata Application This is a species that is starting to encounter some commercial interest/ It is currently not listed in the AFNS. It is listed in CAAB (Code 23 257007) as Blacklip Oyster so it would seem prudent to add the species. This is the name that is commonly used in Australia, but the name Spiny Rock Oyster is also used in some literature.

Application 305 to add the name Blacklip Oyster for Saccostrea echinata (Quoy & Gaimard, 1835) No responded to stakeholder 26 feedback No responded to Blacklip 9 Oyster Group Yes 8 No 1

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 29 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

No comment on this 0 application More appropriate Name 0 Provided further information 1

Comments Application 305. There are multiple issues here. Firstly, there are two sympatric species of Blacklip Oysters in northern Australia and both of them have historically had the scientific name “Saccostrea echinata” (sic; not “echinate” which is a typo introduced by the Word autocorrect function). The name of the smaller species is reasonably stabilised now (morphologically, genetically and biogeographically) as Saccostea cucullata. The specific name of the larger one, which is presently being investigated for commercial purposes by the Darwin Aquaculture Centre, is – on my recommendation – presently called Saccostrea mytiloides. I am aware that name is treated as a junior synonym of S. echinata in WoRMS at present, but the type localities are different and I am confident they will be shown to be different species when their genetics have been investigated. In terms of common names, how about Lesser Black-lip Oyster for the former species and Greater Black-lip Oyster for the latter species?

Points raised in discussions were:  An industry workshop is to be in Sept/Oct and suggest an agenda item on naming conventions for oysters should be included in the agenda;  Need the genetics to be undertaken to distinguish  There will be a section on genetics at the workshop  Suggestion to defer application, and await for an application from industry

Resolution 34.36. FNC deferred Application 305 to amend the AFNS by adding the name Blacklip Oyster for Saccostrea echinata (Quoy & Gaimard, 1835) to be relisted at FNC 35.

GROUP 5 OSMERUS MORDAX PROPOSED AMENDMENTS (IMPORTED SPECIES)

CAAB Code Standard Fish Name Scientific Name Authority SMELTS — Osmeridae 37 096750 SMELT Osmeridae - undifferentiated Rainbow smelt (App 306) Osmerus mordax (Mitchill, 1814)

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 30 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Proposed New Entry Proposed amendment to an existing entry

6.5.14 Application 306 to add the name Rainbow Smelt for Osmerus mordax (Mitchill, 1814) Attachment 31 - App 306 Osmerus mordax Application Osmerus mordax is a species that has not been imported into Australia previously. FNC gave provisional approval to the use of the proposed name at FNC 33.

Application 306 to add the name Rainbow Smelt for Osmerus mordax (Mitchill, 1814) No responded to stakeholder 26 feedback No responded to Yabby 9 Group Yes 9 No 0

No comment on this 0 application

More appropriate Name 0 Provided further information 0 Comments

Resolution 34.37. FNC supported Application 306 to amend the AFNS by adding the name Rainbow Smelt for Osmerus mordax (Mitchill, 1814)

For 13 Against 0 Abstain 0

GROUP 6 TURBAN SHELLS OR PERIWINKLES CAAB Code Standard Fish Name Scientific Name Authority

PERIWINKLE - Littorinidae, Neritidae, Trochidae & Turbinidae (undifferentiated) 24 094901 PERIWINKLE Littorinidae, Neritidae, Trochidae & Turbinidae spp

24 045904 TURBAN SHELLS (App 290) Turbinidae spp

24 045001 Green Turban Shell (App 307) Turbo marmoratus Linnaeus, 1758

24 045002 Smooth Turban Shell (App 308) Turbo imperialis Gmelin, 1791

24 045003 Rough Turban Shell (App 292) Lunella torquata (Gmelin, 1791)

24 045004 Wavy Periwinkle (App 289) Lunella undulata (Lightfoot, 1786)

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 31 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Proposed Amended entry

6.5.15 Application 292 to add the SFN Rough Turban Shell for Lunella torquata (Gmelin, 1791)) Attachment 32 - App 292 Lunella torquata Application The original application 292 was to add the SFN Rough Turban Shell for Lunella torquata (Gmelin, 1791) Following the public consultation process, FNC 33 accepted the argument received and decided to revisit the name with a new recommendation In particular, one comment was “The proposed SFN is fairly generic and doesn't seem to allow for clear communication or differentiation among other Turbinids, either in the market or among those who 'work' with the various Turbinids e.g. fishers, fishery researchers and managers. A SFN like 'Rough Turban Shell' for L. torquata, would reflect the physical appearance of this species and logically extend the 'Turban Shell' SFM used for the Turdinidae. Further, the SFM 'Rough Turban Shell' would allow the logical extension of a SFM (or common name) 'Smooth Turban Shell' for Turbo imperialis, a species commonly caught in the NSW Sea Urchin and Turban Shell Fishery and marketed alongside L. toquata. Without a more specific common name for L. torquata (excuse the terminology) there is greater risk of misreporting and/or miscommunicating among these species - even for individuals who work in this field.”

Application 292 to add the SFN Rough Turban Shell for Lunella torquata (Gmelin, 1791)) No responded to stakeholder 26 feedback No responded to Turban 10 Shells Group Yes 6 No 1

No comment on this 2 application More appropriate Name 1 Provided further information 1 Comments

Application 292. I would be interested to know where the name “Rough Turban Shell” came from. That name seems rather general to me as there are numerous (perhaps 20) species of turban snails in Australia that could be described as “rough”. I notice that the late Neville Coleman (reference below), always an advocate for using common names, calls this species simply the Sydney Turban. How about Sydney Turban Snail? Application 308. The scientific name Turbo imperialis that appears on your list is incorrect. The correct name for the eastern Australian species is Turbo militaris (see

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 32 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

https://seashellsofnsw.org.au/Turbinidae/Pages/Turbo_militaris.htm. True Turbo imperialis comes from the coasts of China. I would be interested to know where the name “Smooth Turban Shell” came from. That name seems rather general to me as there are numerous (perhaps 10) species of turban snails in Australia that could be described as “smooth”. In fact using “smooth” for Turbo militaris is a misnomer because the whorls of specimens originating in sheltered habitats bear a wide but low spiral rib at the shoulder and another at the periphery, and these ribs can bear short open spines or tubercles. How about Military Turban Snail?

Grant Pullen advised that NT supported the proposal but Victoria were against the proposal so would be abstaining from the vote.

Resolution 34.38. FNC supported Application 292 to amend the AFNS by adding the SFN Rough Turban Shell for Lunella torquata (Gmelin, 1791))

For 12 Against 0 Abstain 1

6.5.16 Application 307 to add the name SFN Green Turban Shell for Turbo marmoratus Linnaeus, 1758 Attachment 33 - App 307 Turbo marmoratus Application Application 307 to add the SFN Green Turban Shell for Turbo marmoratus Linnaeus, 1758 No responded to stakeholder 26 feedback No responded to Turban 10 Shells Group Yes 6 No 1

No comment on this 3 application More appropriate Name 1 Provided further information 1 Comments Application 292. I would be interested to know where the name “Rough Turban Shell” came from. That name seems rather general to me as there are numerous (perhaps 20) species of turban snails in Australia that could be described as “rough”. I notice that the late Neville Coleman (reference below), always an advocate for using common names, calls this species simply the Sydney Turban. How about Sydney Turban Snail? Application 308. The scientific name Turbo imperialis that appears on your list is incorrect. The correct name for the eastern Australian species is Turbo militaris (see https://seashellsofnsw.org.au/Turbinidae/Pages/Turbo_militaris.htm. True Turbo imperialis comes from the coasts of China. I would be interested to know where the name “Smooth Turban Shell” came from. That name seems rather general to me as there are numerous (perhaps 10) species of turban snails in Australia that could be described as “smooth”. In fact using “smooth”

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 33 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

for Turbo militaris is a misnomer because the whorls of specimens originating in sheltered habitats bear a wide but low spiral rib at the shoulder and another at the periphery, and these ribs can bear short open spines or tubercles. How about Military Turban Snail?

Resolution 34.39. FNC supported Application 307 to amend the AFNS by adding the SFN Green Turban Shell for Turbo marmoratus Linnaeus, 1758

For 12 Against 0 Abstain 1

6.5.17 Application 308 to add the name SFN Smooth Turban Shell for Turbo imperialis Gmelin, 1791 Attachment 34 - App 308 Turbo imperialis Application Application 308 to add the SFN Smooth Turban Shell for Turbo imperialis Gmelin, 1791 No responded to stakeholder 26 feedback No responded to Turban 10 Shells Group Yes 7 No 1 No comment on this 2 application

More appropriate Name 1 Provided further information 1 Comments Application 292. I would be interested to know where the name “Rough Turban Shell” came from. That name seems rather general to me as there are numerous (perhaps 20) species of turban snails in Australia that could be described as “rough”. I notice that the late Neville Coleman (reference below), always an advocate for using common names, calls this species simply the Sydney Turban. How about Sydney Turban Snail? Application 308. The scientific name Turbo imperialis that appears on your list is incorrect. The correct name for the eastern Australian species is Turbo militaris (see https://seashellsofnsw.org.au/Turbinidae/Pages/Turbo_militaris.htm. True Turbo imperialis comes from the coasts of China. I would be interested to know where the name “Smooth Turban Shell” came from. That name seems rather general to me as there are numerous (perhaps 10) species of turban snails in Australia that could be described as “smooth”. In fact using “smooth” for Turbo militaris is a misnomer because the whorls of specimens originating in sheltered habitats bear a wide but low spiral rib at the shoulder and another at the periphery, and these ribs can bear short open spines or tubercles. How about Military Turban Snail?

There was some concern based on the comments received as to the proper scientific name for the species. It was recommended that any decision be deferred to FNC 35 to allow for clarification of the proper scientific name.

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 34 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Resolution 34.40. FNC determined that Application 308 to amend the AFNS by adding the SFN Smooth Turban Shell for Turbo imperialis Gmelin, 1791 should be deferred to FNC 35 for further clarification as to the scientific name.

6.6 Proposed amendment to the Australian Fish Names Standard Discussion As discussed previously, some editorial amendments to the AFNS will be implemented prior to the next publishing of the standard. It is proposed that the Australian Standard for Aquatic Plant Names be developed and the editorial amendments that are required be implemented into that standard. Following publication of AS XXXX the Australian Standard for Aquatic Plant Names, the amendments be incorporated into AS 5300 and the revised standard with all amendments to Annex A be published. This will be early 2019. FNC will be asked to consider the proposed amendments to the standard in early 2019.

Resolution 34.41. FNC noted the report on the publishing of AS 5300 the Australian Fish Names Standard where the AFNS will be published in 2019 incorporating all amendments to date.

6.7 Emergent Issues raised in relation to fish names 6.7.1 Mud Crabs and Mud Crabs. The Project Manager reported that the following email had been received in relation to Mud Crabs Hi Alan As way of introduction I am the Principal Scientist in the NT fisheries research unit. I have had to have more involvement in the Mud Crab fishery here in the last couple of years and obviously didn’t consider this issue as a high enough priority. I see from the email strings below this was a fairly lengthy debate which I see now has concluded. The problem is that the name Giant Mud Crab was never supported by the NT Government and our representative only acted on his own opinion rather than taking advice back from our advisory committees. Chris Calogeras’ points below have all been discussed at these committees and they have been overwhelmingly supported by the group i.e. to maintain Scyla serrata as ‘Mud Crab’ and not change it to Giant Mud Crab. I’m happy to chat about this but it would be good to redact this name if possible. If it’s beyond your remit I’m happy to speak with FRDC. Sorry to cause you further hassles on this issue. Thor My response to the writer was: Thor Thank you for your email I am sure you are aware of the background to this issue but I will recount it anyway. (see below) Date Meeting Action

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 35 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Early 2016 SAFS working group needed to have individual species of mud crabs identified in the AFNS and asked the FNC to assign standard fish names for in particular Scylla serrata July 2016 Proposed amendments prepared for FNC deliberation 25 August 2016 FNC 30 Approved the proposed names to proceed to Public consultation (including Giant Mud Crab for Scylla serrata 24 November 2016 Public consultation conducted, and proposed amendments distributed widely. Submissions were received including a proposal from NT that Scylla serrata should be Marbled Mud Crab 15 March 2017 FNC 31 Decision deferred after request from AFMF for further consideration based on a request from Western Australia May-June 2017 Further investigations conducted, and discussions held within the AFMF group 26 September 2017 FNC 32 Alternative names proposed including Serrated Mud Crab for Scylla serrata and proceed to public consultation Early 2018 Public consultation again conducted with options for names put forward 8 May 2018 FNC 33 Based on the results of the public consultation, FNC approved the name Giant Mud Crab for Scylla serrata This name in two rounds of public consultation was the more popular choice FRDC is a standards development organisation and the Fish Names Committee is the Standards Reference Body responsible for the maintenance and ongoing development of AS 5300. As such, it must abode by the international principles of standardisation including the international principle of consensus. Consensus was achieved at FNC 33 and the name Giant Mud Crab for Scylla serrata has been approved. There is no basis for the FNC to not implement the decision. It would need someone to prepare a proposed amendment to prepare an application to amend the AFNS by changing the standard fish name Giant Mud Crab for Scylla serrata. Karen Gowlett-Holmes made the following points: FNC had previously approved three species of Mud Crab to be included in the AFNS including Keeled Mud Crab for Scylla paramamosain. Genetic work had been undertaken on the species and it revealed that the species is actually Scylla serrata and not a paramamosain. There is no evidence that the species is currently in Australia but may be in the future It was recommended that the species may be imported and could be farmed in PNG therefore should remain in CAAB as a non-native species and should remain in the AFNS.

Resolution 34.42. FNC recognised that the species Keeled Mud Crab for Scylla paramamosain is not currently an Australian species but determined

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 36 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

that the name should remain in the AFNS and remain in CAAB as a non-native species. 7. SCIENTIFIC NAME UPDATES Any issues that have been raised in relation to changed scientific names are discussed in this section of the agenda. The scientific names for fish is defined in the Australian Fish Names Standards as:  “scientific name”: the unique scientific name for a fish determined as per international convention and consisting of a genus name and a species name - the scientific names used in this Standard are those advised by CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research or another competent authority.  “taxonomic group name” an animal or plant’s taxonomic group name as per international convention. The taxonomic group names used in this standard are those advised by CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, or another competent authority. The Fish Names Committee does not determine Scientific Names for fish but notes their content and includes the amended name in the AFNS following reputable taxonomic advice. We do, however, have some control as to when we change the scientific name in the AFNS.

7.1 Changes to Pacific Oyster There was some debate at FNC 33 about changes to the Pacific oyster. It was reported that there is now a revised scientific name. It is no longer Crassostrea gigas, now it is Magallana gigas (Thunberg, 1793) Apparently, the Asian species of Crassostrea are sufficiently different from American species to warrant a new genus. Karen Gowlett-Holmes looked at the relevant literature for the Pacific Oyster, and has advised that the name should be changed to Magallana gigas. Karen further advised that the CAAB database has now been updated accordingly. All the species from this region previously placed in Crassostrea have been moved to Magallana. The relevant paper also looked at Ostrea, including our native species Ostrea angasi– their genetic data supported keeping this species in Ostrea, Two further papers have recently been provided (attached) which further discuss the changes from Crassostrea to Magallana. Attachment 35 - NSA Newslett-2018(1)-3-Crassostrea vs Magallana Attachment 36 - Bayne et al 2017 JSR A dissenting view of Magallan Karen Gowlett-Holmes gave an update at the meeting and report on actions taken with regards to the listing in CAAB. (see http://www.marine.csiro.au/caabsearch/caab_search.caab_report?spcode=23257001 ) It was reported that the species name Crassostrea gigas, was listed in legislation and precautions should be taken when changing the species name.

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 37 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Resolution 34.43. FNC recommended that the entry in the AFNS remain as it currently is and be reviewed in 12 months’ time.

7.2 Changes to Lethrinus sp in CAAB John Pogonoski gave an update on the amendment to the entry for Bluespotted Emperor CAAB Code 37 351001 which was previously listed the Scientific Name: Lethrinus sp. [Carpenter, pers comm]. The entry in CAAB was updated in June 2018 as below. CAAB Code Standard Fish Name Scientific Name Authority 37 351001 Bluespotted Emperor Lethrinus punctulatus Macleay, 1878

The entry in the AFNS was amended to Lethrinus sp.in December 2017 8. FUTURE FISH NAMES WORK PROGRAM AND ACTIVITIES

8.1 Update on the progress of FRDC Project 2015-210 FRDC Project 2015-210 “FRDC resource: Australian Fish Names Standard (AS 5300)” was again funded by the FRDC. This is a three-year project commencing on 1 October 2015. The project comes to an end on 1 October 2018. A project extension until mid-2019 is proposed to allow for some amendments to the project application. 9. FUTURE FNC MEETINGS The Schedule of past FNC meetings was distributed as Attachment 37 - List of Past FNC Meetings and Venues.docx FNC is scheduled to have a face to face meeting once per year with one or more teleconferences as required. FNC members were asked whether they would prefer to have the face-to face meeting early in the year or later as is currently the case. FNC members indicated that the face to face in the later part of the year is preferable. It was suggested that aligning with a SECC meeting in Melbourne would be a worthwhile option if possible.

Resolution 34.44. FNC agreed that the meetings for 2019 be:

 A teleconference to be held on 8 May 2019  A face to face meeting in Melbourne to align with a SECC meeting if possible on a date to be determined in October 2019.

MEETING DATE VENUE FNC 33 8 May 2018 Teleconference

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 38 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

FNC 34 4-5 September 2018 Hobart FNC 35 9 April 2019 Teleconference FNC 36 October 2019 Melbourne to align with a SECC meeting

10. OTHER BUSINESS

10.1 Meeting at FRDC and Issues raised A few issues have been raised where there is a disconnect between the marketing name or branding that is used and the AFNS. One example is where a product is labelled as simply kingfish where the species is Yellowtail Kingfish but there have been other instances. The concern is that the Fish Names Standard is in danger of becoming irrelevant, particularly if a company can simply trademark a name and then completely ignore the AFNS. This was discussed briefly at FNC 33, but it is opportune to discuss again. As referred to previously, a meeting was held at FRDC between the Project Manager and key FRDC staff. Key questions for the FNC  Are we meeting our key customers/stakeholders needs?  How do we handle cases where a name is shortened in the marketplace for convenience which can cause confusion? E.g. Yellowtail Kingfish is just called Kingfish on packaging or in restaurants E.g. Tropical Snapper and Snapper Group names and how to handle?  How to deal with a fish name that does not sell the product to consumers?  Where are the problem areas that Fish Names needs to address (Where is the market failure)?  The China List – the problem area?  Link between branding and Country of Origin labelling Issues to seek advice about  Branded product e.g. Skull Island Prawns which are Tiger Prawns  Comment – similar scenario to Crystal Bay Prawns  For fish products – e.g. caviar – what species and is it important?  Other fish products? What are the benefits we provide?  Benefit cost analysis  Key performance indicators? o Traceability – Supply Chain Integrity o Market access – e.g. the China List o Branding? o Country of Origin Labelling

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 39 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

o Avoiding food fraud Actions 1. Need to identify the problem areas 2. A Benefit Cost Analysis needs to be undertaken in the very near future to ascertain the stakeholder view of the fish names process. It is proposed that a number of key stakeholders be contacted for a short telephone interview to gather feedback. 3. Need to quantify a KPI Framework 4. Need to talk to key stakeholders as to what Fish Names is doing well and not doing well

FNC discussed the matter and agreed that branding is an issue. The FNC is to provide advice on how to brand and stay consistent with branding. We may need to develop a position paper. The issue of shortening of a name was also discussed such as Snapper which could be Tropical Snapper or Snapper. It was agreed that a set of FNC Advisory Notes should be developed on key issues:  How to handle shortening of names and stay consistent with the protocols; (e.g. Snapper for Tropical Snapper, Kingfish for Yellowtail Kingfish)  How to handle branding issues within the fish names protocols (e.g. Skull Island Prawns); How to add branding to a name  How to handle market names v non-marketing names;  If COOL is to be used, how to use in naming e.g. place names Localities  A Fact sheet on the China/Export list, particularly the importance of scientific names  Indigenous naming – a suggestion to try to develop a list of 50 regional names, tourism names  Issue about sub products of products, roe, how to use a sub product how to use a byproduct e.g. Is it Atlantic Salmon Caviar or is it Salmon Caviar

Resolution 34.45. The Project Manager to work with FRDC to develop a set of fact sheets relating to the issues raised at the meeting. And distribute through the FNC for comment

10.2 Benefit Cost Analysis for the FNC The Project Manager reported that a number of issues and criticisms had been raised with him about the FNC and its procedures. Some of thee complaints were completely baseless but there may be valid criticisms being said. It was decided that subject to funding, Meaghan Dodd would interview key people in the industry about the FNC to determine what the criticisms are and report back to FNC. The Project Manager said that this was a worthwhile exercise as the development of a benefit cost is required when re-publishing a standard.

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 40 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

All agencies are developing full digital systems, and many are linking to the Australian Fish Names Standard. A list of what organisations are actually using the A=FNS would be useful. FNC members agreed to provide contact names that should be interviewed.

Resolution 34.46. The Project Manager to commence the development of a list of key people who should be interviewed about the FNC and its perceived failings and distribute to FNC members for addition.

10.3 Meeting at CSIRO with FRDC and CSIRO about the CAAB and Fish Names database. A meeting was held on Tuesday 4 September with key staff from CSIRO and FRDC to discuss the proposed upgrade to the CAAB database. FRDC is to reengineer the Fish Names database and web pages. The Project Manager reported that it was a good meeting and that CSIRO were keen to make sure that more information is available. Patrick Hone said that the FRDC long term goal was to put everything in the cloud, freely available The Project Manager was to develop a wish list of what they would like to see with regards to linkages to the two databases, discuss with IT at FRDC, and provide to CSIRO for further development.

Resolution 34.47. The Project Manager to develop a wish list of deliverables for the Fish Names database and web pages.

Resolution 34.48. FNC members to provide input as to what they would like to see delivered on a re-engineered web page and database.

Resolution 34.49. The FNC and the Project Manager to develop a list of organisations and places where fish names are mandated

10.4 Appointment of Deputy Chair’ The chair called for nominations fir the role of Deputy Chair which was vacant due tot the departure of Richard Stevens

Ani Conn was nominated and duly appointed.

Resolution 34.50. Anni Conn was appointed as Deputy Chair of the Fish Names Committee

10.5 Other issues from FNC Members 1. FRDC is developing fish identification kits, 2. Biosecurity Australia has its own database of names 3. Russell Conway said that an app for fish name identification would be useful as a website is not as accessible. The app would provide an interface and provides a feedback mechanism. He said that recreational fishers are sponges ad would love access to more information. A QR Code would be useful.

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 41 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Patrick said that a fish application could be developed but the FRDC cannot complete with a private organisation. 11. CLOSE OF MEETING The meeting closed at 1:50 PM

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 42 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

12. List of Attachments Att # File description FRDC SharePoint 1 Proxy Voting Form https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EUQ4GfrFt7F Ml-Fi409tZboB-JrzeVZV9NMLxLvBsv2rYw 2 SRB Members Code of https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EQrhbIQi_FtKo Conduct p3umvEy3-QBH7-nMQzCjbA681koBp1FJw 3 SRB Register Fish Names https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EV6j9IfG2d1B qDTPdmRewA8BckRsOmw6kCuoRjkwhfjypw 4 FNC 33 Minutes https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EU4RNGLPYjF ApGSUOgNV3pEBN9wvp3KTdZk-P8_AFtTvqA 5 Project Manager Activity https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EQtORtBJeRZ Report OuNEtbHTrvHsBvgKjdsUKkWmGE1uQLWZ7zw 6 FRDC Board Briefing https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EecDa8QdPLt Hrsq0G0QgHdcBwVPOXW9Kib_PzO9PhlsWCg 7 SD Policy https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:b:/s/FishNames/ER_LTH7Xx1xB k98DwoglH_4BaJf1mtupKtJr-FDl7OBXAA 8 SD Procedures https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:b:/s/FishNames/EZa8arxjOqxCh WQoZh5GrUkBQWeLPSm3KgOp3B0oGeBQ4g 9 Fish Names Committee https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EV6j9IfG2d1B Procedures qDTPdmRewA8BsMP0GdxUODb0tdHlkLi8tQ 10 App 309 Metanephrops https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EeuFaL2uj- australiensis Application RNlcsgC0dGGTIBVQ3XyzGUfcy-phZLtmmzuQ 11 App 309 Metanephrops https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:b:/s/FishNames/EUEq5RQq- australiensis Provisional RtHrnQv1PScjDEBRPlp-MLStaxUHu3jmbequA approval 12 App 310 Aristeus virilis https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EYyNtcr7y8NN Application nkZ4-wPzn_8Br47W7na1PBr2nr2iJvwzaw 13 App 311 Heterocarpus https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EVN5E- sibogae Application kL2V9FmuQ6eVUhOMEBZdr4v1p0LpR1FT2p7xS_6w 14 App 312 Heterocarpus https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EbRDwrRK- woodmasoni Application S1CnFG_VkVAaK0BIKXC_DlxdFYi9FdppJsdGA 15 FNC 33 Public https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:x:/s/FishNames/EQYeLbM- Consultation Spreadsheet vSNFlDMMRsEOjewB8Mf9th8TQCemo-RwC0ga_w 16 FNC 33 Public https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:b:/s/FishNames/EWnzfBAWnqd Consultation all responses AsC0k8YMZH58BhhOIVL0eifXYGXEmhBJMMw 17 FNC 34 Voting form https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EeJRGOIdkVZL qIheHCwhni0BaRNj4p7Af3f2rQV2vJKdRQ 18 App 293 delete Blacktip https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EQ88fsKyXvRH Sharks Application kAkVYjHFi-MBC7sPAkEVU0aO1UWo59_09A

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 43 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Att # File description FRDC SharePoint 19 App 294 revised Blacktip https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EQjm49k7u4JK Sharks group Application vBTBGcUUcHsBL5D_JmxC_LCrkjNt2jpB3A 20 App 295 Centrostephanus https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EWcDbb9r8v9 rodgersii Application GhHUYL71LslMBwG_QNuH2mop7alWYV07uxQ 21 App 296 Centrostephanus https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EXdYAWKLAQ tenuispinus Application pPq0zg4hG53C8BhaP6q2DMGQS_7qvfj3UUOQ 22 App 297 Diadema setosum https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/ERLdrxsPn49P Application sdeSet-JSBwB6ZuC9kU7fDfkFEBXM2Nd0A 23 App 298 Tripneustes https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EbTZvzWwBw gratilla Application FOvQo7sEHo7OwBvtkp5mmfruXC3XWrXaQ2vw 24 App 299 Heliocidaris https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EZHo558H6bt erythrogramma DvEvgp9KpbWsBAihavouExaRvAnHaVXsxxg Application 25 App 300 Heliocidaris https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EXnf8Sjr5bNGt tuberculata Application yi6VrCaqc0Bv6Tz6n5y6TF-cfcOIhO4GQ 26 App 301 Echinometra https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EdoTFC7xf9pH mathaei Application hQXm0eRYglEBIAmpwKl93b8OlUX9ggXjEQ 27 App 302 Evechinus https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EYSwipsgceNO chloroticus Application uMZ8QaSakQcBlFfygvLBplk56q7rU5CTjw 28 App 303 Cherax albidus https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/ETIYExqgyNRE Application vsfAnXU2OFcBkaj-X4Pg9gUa5elsf3EBbA 29 App 304 Cherax https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EeL5pUzZHy9J tenuimanus Application vmubkJonM3YBklPiwpIjy3CVZQez_Oj61A 30 App 305 Saccostrea https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EWFc7kbI0yVK echinata Application t7Di7QLEjFIBEpqSqfbcsWW16zEBLAIKpw 31 App 306 Osmerus mordax https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EQLmKvpEBzp Application IurCZ_2aZbC8BmO0IrrMa901gb8ALUXPM4g 32 App 292 Lunella torquata https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EZ6LL1gFdyFBl Application 0xkGWYJ4uIBiAiPwJxlbnqAbQq8wDhMMg 33 App 307 Turbo https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/Eb9OL180e1V marmoratus Application OqvCNSsWKBNYBFr3chlUuqoIB9szItmRakg 34 App 308 Turbo imperialis https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/ESJr_WM9peV Application Ph9-fPlIP6f0B0Dkah4mUFf35TA5LpNX5EA 35 NSA Newslett-2018(1)-3- https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:b:/s/FishNames/ERCqdvQ3RmB Crassostrea vs Magallana PpAHmMT7mcIMBQHkTvRZh_p8KevqV5t2leQ 36 Bayne et al 2017 JSR A https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:b:/s/FishNames/ETm3VusgkmF dissenting view of Pn1zBo1FyHK8BF1kUbx6YEdzW-qOHBE6irg Magallan

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 44 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx

Att # File description FRDC SharePoint 37 FNC Meetings and venues https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/FishNames/EechK2w0a3V GkG6sxEtJvoYBQYj8R9T7oJLxHTmrOO1Lgw

Document Location: 16:55:31 25-Sep-18 Page 45 of 45 https://frdc1.sharepoint.com/sites/FishNames/Meetings/FNC 34 Minutes.docx