DOCSLIB.ORG

Williston Watershed Kokanee Spawner Distribution and Enumeration Surveys (2002 – 2006)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PEACE REGION Williston Watershed Kokanee Spawner Distribution and Enumeration Surveys (2002 – 2006) A.R. Langston December 2012 FWCP – Peace Region Report No. 357 The Fish & Wildlife Compensation Program – Peace Region is a cooperative venture of BC Hydro and the provincial fish and wildlife management agencies, supported by funding from BC Hydro. The Program was established to enhance and protect fish and wildlife resources affected by the construction of the W.A.C. Bennett and Peace Canyon dams on the Peace River, and the subsequent creation of the Williston and Dinosaur Reservoirs. Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program ––– Peace Region 9228 – 100 th Avenue, Fort St. John, BC, V1J 1X7 Website: www.fwcp.ca This report has been approved by the Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program – Peace Region Fish Technical Committee. Citation : A.R. Langston. 2012. Williston Watershed Kokanee Spawner Distribution and Enumeration Surveys (2002 – 2006). Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program – Peace Region Report No. 357. 11 pp plus appendices. Author: A.R. Langston, BC Hydro Correspondence: BC Hydro - Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program – Peace Region 9228 – 100 th Avenue, Fort St. John, BC V1J 1X7 Williston Reservoir Kokanee Spawner Surveys 2002-2006 A.R. Langston ABSTRACT Kokanee ( Oncorhynchus nerka ) were stocked into Williston Reservoir from 1990 to 1998 to create a kokanee sport fishery and a prey source for large piscivorous fish species. The status of the kokanee population in Williston Reservoir and success of the kokanee stocking program is unknown. Therefore, a five-year study (2002–2006) was conducted to determine trends in Williston Reservoir’s kokanee population. The study had four objectives: (i) to determine the peak spawning period of kokanee; (ii) to determine if kokanee populations are increasing; (iii) to identify kokanee spawner distribution and limits to upstream migration; and (iv) to propose candidate streams for a long-term population trend monitoring program. Survey flights to locate and enumerate spawning kokanee were conducted annually by helicopter over all suspected and reported spawning streams. Kokanee spawners were most abundant in the tributaries in mid-September. The observed number of spawners increased from 81,000 in 2002 to 1,011,000 in 2006. This change suggests a dramatic increase in the Williston Reservoir kokanee population and a successful result to the 1990–1998 kokanee stocking program. Kokanee were found to be distributed throughout the watershed, but their abundance varied. The Peace Reach tributaries had the lowest number of kokanee spawners (<1% of all spawners), and the Parsnip tributaries had the second lowest (<8%). The greatest distribution and highest numbers were observed in the Omineca Arm (60–89%, depending on the year) and Finlay Reach (2–36%) tributaries. During the survey, information was recorded about upstream migration barriers. These barriers are not believed to limit kokanee spawning success, because accessible spawning habitat appeared to be abundant in lower reaches. The barriers have prevented kokanee access to some locations, most notably the Nation Lakes, Germansen Lake, and the Finlay River upstream of Cascade Canyon. Based on the five years of aerial surveys, a long-term population trend monitoring program is recommended for up to nine identified index tributary streams. Annual monitoring of the index streams is recommended with an evaluation of the monitoring in 2010. In addition, biennial aerial surveys beginning in 2008 are recommended for Parsnip River tributaries in the vicinity of Arctic and Tacheeda lakes. These biennial surveys will determine if non-native kokanee are expanding their range closer to native kokanee populations. Whole watershed surveys similar to those conducted in 2002 to 2006 are recommended every fourth year (beginning in 2010) to document colonization of new habitat and range expansion of kokanee. i Williston Reservoir Kokanee Spawner Surveys 2002-2006 A.R. Langston INTRODUCTION Background and Scope The Peace/Williston Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program (PWFWCP), created in 1988, compensates for impacts to fish and wildlife associated with the formation of Williston Reservoir. Williston Reservoir was formed in 1968 by the construction of the W.A.C. Bennett hydro-electric dam on the Peace River. The goals and objectives of the PWFWCP are available in Bergmann et al. 2003. Williston watershed, prior to reservoir formation, supported localized native kokanee populations, in at least three locations: Thutade Lake (Finlay River headwaters), Arctic Lake (upper Parsnip River tributary) and Tacheeda Lakes (mid Parsnip River tributary). Small numbers of native kokanee have always existed in Williston Reservoir, most likely from the headwater Thutade Lake kokanee ( Oncorhynchus nerka ) population. In the late 1980s, the British Columbia Ministry of Environment made the management decision to stock kokanee into Williston Reservoir (Harvey Andrusak, pers. comm., Redfish Consulting Ltd., previously with Ministry of Environment). The intent was to hasten the establishment of kokanee as a significant pelagic population in Williston Reservoir to provide both sport fishery opportunities and a prey source for piscivorous fish species (Blackman et. al. 1990). Kokanee from Hill Creek and Meadow Creek, both in BC (Columbia River origin), provided the donor source of fish for stocking. The PWFWCP funded and managed the stocking into the Carbon, Davis, Dunlevy, Manson, and Nation (Williston tributaries) systems from 1990–1998 (Appendix A). Kokanee are a pelagic planktivore that survive exceptionally well in reservoirs despite large drawdowns. Kokanee were stocked and have survived and grown very well in southeastern BC reservoirs: Mica and Koocanusa (Harvey Andrusak, pers. comm.) and Kinbasket (Oliver 1995). The establishment of a Williston Reservoir kokanee population may be a success that benefits recreational anglers, potential First Nations fisheries, certain terrestrial wildlife species (e.g., bears, eagles), and most fish species. However, there are concerns about an expanding kokanee population of Columbia River origin having potentially negative impacts on some native species (e.g., Arctic grayling ( Thymallus arcticus ) and native Williston kokanee. Aerial surveys have previously been conducted to locate and enumerate spawning native kokanee. Presence/absence surveys were conducted in the lower Finlay River in 1989. In 1990 the entire Finlay River and 18 tributaries of Williston Reservoir were surveyed (McLean and Blackman 1991). Four of the 1990 surveyed tributaries were re-surveyed in 1994 (Langston and Zemlak 1998). The results of the 1990 and 1994 surveys (5,000 or less spawning kokanee observed) indicated that relatively low numbers of native kokanee inhabited Williston Reservoir. No further enumerations had been conducted until the current study, which used aerial enumeration of spawning kokanee, as described by Fleck 1992, to evaluate the results of the 9-year kokanee stocking program and to estimate relative changes in kokanee populations and spawner distribution in the Williston Reservoir watershed. 1 Williston Reservoir Kokanee Spawner Surveys 2002-2006 A.R. Langston Study Objectives This five-year study (2002–2006) in the Williston watershed had four objectives: (i) to determine the peak spawning period of kokanee; (ii) to determine if kokanee populations are increasing; (iii) to identify kokanee spawner distribution and limits to upstream migration; and (iv) to propose candidate streams for long-term population trend monitoring. Description of Study Area Williston Reservoir (56° N latitude, 124° W longitude) is located approximately 140 km north of Prince George in northeast British Columbia, Canada (Fig. 1). The reservoir was created in 1968 by impounding the Peace River in the canyon near Hudson’s Hope, B.C. for hydroelectric generation (W.A.C. Bennett Dam). A second dam, Peace Canyon, is located 22 km downstream of the W.A.C. Bennett Dam. The Peace River flows east to Lake Athabasca within the Mackenzie River drainage system, which flows north and discharges into the Arctic Ocean. Williston Reservoir has a mean depth of 44 m and a maximum depth of 166 m (BC Research 1977). The shoreline is dendritic in shape and estimated to be about 1,770 km long (BC Research 1977). With a surface area of 1,779 km 2 at a maximum, normal operating level of 672.1 m (BC Hydro 1988), Williston Reservoir is the largest lentic freshwater system in British Columbia. A comprehensive description of the watershed is available in Stockner et al. 2005. Thutade Lake Peace Reach Finlay Reach Omineca Arm Parsnip Reach Tacheeda Lakes Arctic Lake Fig. 1. Williston Reservoir watershed. The four areas with kokanee spawning tributaries (circled), the 3 known locations of native kokanee populations highlighted in yellow. 2 Williston Reservoir Kokanee Spawner Surveys 2002-2006 A.R. Langston METHODS Tributary selection The streams stocked with kokanee from 1990 to 1998 (Appendix A) were surveyed in 2002 to 2006. In addition, the streams surveyed in 1990 (McLean and Blackman 1991) and 1994 (Langston and Zemlak 1998) were re-surveyed in 2002 to 2006. Other streams were selected according to geographic area (so the survey would cover as much area as possible), habitat attributes, and reports from local area residents of kokanee presence. Not all streams were surveyed in each year of the 2002–2006 survey. Rain storms and shortage of time meant skipping some streams
Recommended publications
  • TREATY 8: a British Columbian Anomaly

    TREATY 8: a British Columbian Anomaly

    TREATY 8: A British Columbian Anomaly ARTHUR J. RAY N THE ANNALS OF NATIVE BRITISH COLUMBIA, 1999 undoubtedly will be remembered as the year when, in a swirl of controversy, Ithe provincial legislature passed the Nisga'a Agreement. The media promptly heralded the agreement as the province's first modern Indian treaty. Unmentioned, because it has been largely forgotten, was the fact that the last major "pre-modern" agreement affecting British Columbia -Treaty 8 - had been signed 100 years earlier. This treaty encompasses a sprawling 160,900-square-kilometre area of northeastern British Columbia (Map 1), which is a territory that is nearly twenty times larger than that covered by the Nisga'a Agreement. In addition, Treaty 8 includes the adjoining portions of Alberta and the Northwest Territories. Treaty 8 was negotiated at a time when British Columbia vehemently denied the existence of Aboriginal title or self-governing rights. It therefore raises two central questions. First, why, in 1899, was it ne­ cessary to bring northeastern British Columbia under treaty? Second, given the contemporary Indian policies of the provincial government, how was it possible to do so? The latter question raises two other related issues, both of which resurfaced during negotiations for the modern Nisga'a Agreement. The first concerned how the two levels of government would share the costs of making a treaty. (I will show that attempts to avoid straining federal-provincial relations over this issue in 1899 created troublesome ambiguities in Treaty 8.) The second concerned how much BC territory had to be included within the treaty area.
  • Williston-Dinosaur Watershed Fish Mercury Investigation 2017 Report

    Williston-Dinosaur Watershed Fish Mercury Investigation 2017 Report

    Williston-Dinosaur Watershed Fish Mercury Investigation 2017 Report Prepared for: Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program, Peace Region 3333 22nd Ave. Prince George, BC V2N 1B4 June 2018 Azimuth Consulting Group Partnership 218-2902 West Broadway Vancouver BC, V6K 2G8 Project No. CO94394 Williston-Dinosaur Watershed Fish Mercury Investigation – 2017 Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program (FWCP) – Peace Region carried out a strategic planning process in 2012-13 to review and identify program priorities in this region. Guided by a Strategic Planning Group (SPG), including First Nations, academia, BC Hydro and the FWCP-Peace Board, a Peace Basin Plan and six Action Plans were finalized in 2014. Objective 3a of the Reservoirs Action Plan is to “Improve understanding of mercury concentrations, contamination pathways and potential effects on human health and the broader ecosystem.” Initial efforts on this objective were commissioned by FWCP Peace in 2014 and identified the need to obtain updated information on fish mercury concentrations and consumption habits. In 2016, the Azimuth Consulting Group (Azimuth) team (including EDI Environmental Dynamics [EDI], Chu Cho Environmental [CCE] and Hagen and Associates) was awarded a multi-year contract to collect fish mercury data from the Parsnip, Peace, Finlay reaches of Williston and Dinosaur reservoirs and reference lakes (i.e., the Williston-Dinosaur Watershed Fish Mercury Study). Results of this investigation will assess provide an updated fish mercury database for the Williston-Dinosaur watershed and understanding of how results compare with nearby reference lakes. The long-term goal is to ‘update’ the existing fish consumption advisory, in partnership with provincial health agencies.
  • Williston Reservoir Bathymetry

    Williston Reservoir Bathymetry

    Peace River Project Water Use Plan Williston Reservoir Bathymetry Reference: GMSWORKS 25 Williston Reservoir Bathymetric Mapping Study Period: June 2010 to June 2013 Final Terrasond Precision Geospatial Solutions December 31, 2013 WILLISTON RESERVOIR BATHYMETRIC MAPPING GMSWORKS #25 Contract No. CO50616 Project Report Report Date: December 31, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Terms of Reference ....................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 SURVEY TEAM .......................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 SURVEY DATES .......................................................................................................................... 3 5.0 HORIZONTAL CONTROL ............................................................................................................ 4 5.1 Horizontal Datums ........................................................................................................................ 4 5.2 Horizontal Accuracy ...................................................................................................................... 4 5.3 Horizontal Control and Verification .............................................................................................
  • Evaluation of Techniques for Flood Quantile Estimation in Canada

    Evaluation of Techniques for Flood Quantile Estimation in Canada

    Evaluation of Techniques for Flood Quantile Estimation in Canada by Shabnam Mostofi Zadeh A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2019 ©Shabnam Mostofi Zadeh 2019 Examining Committee Membership The following are the members who served on the Examining Committee for this thesis. The decision of the Examining Committee is by majority vote. External Examiner Veronica Webster Associate Professor Supervisor Donald H. Burn Professor Internal Member William K. Annable Associate Professor Internal Member Liping Fu Professor Internal-External Member Kumaraswamy Ponnambalam Professor ii Author’s Declaration This thesis consists of material all of which I authored or co-authored: see Statement of Contributions included in the thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. iii Statement of Contributions Chapter 2 was produced by Shabnam Mostofi Zadeh in collaboration with Donald Burn. Shabnam Mostofi Zadeh conceived of the presented idea, developed the models, carried out the experiments, and performed the computations under the supervision of Donald Burn. Donald Burn contributed to the interpretation of the results and provided input on the written manuscript. Chapter 3 was completed in collaboration with Martin Durocher, Postdoctoral Fellow of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Donald Burn of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, and Fahim Ashkar, of University of Moncton. The original ideas in this work were jointly conceived by the group.
  • Appendix 3-E Aboriginal Comments Tracking Table

    Appendix 3-E Aboriginal Comments Tracking Table

    Appendix 3-E Aboriginal Groups Comment Tracking Table KEMESS UNDERGROUND PROJECT Application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate Appendix 3-E. Aboriginal Groups Comment Tracking Table Comment AuRico Response Raised By /Comment Source/Date Accidents and Malfunctions Effects of tunneling on The Mines Act (1996) Health, Safety, and Reclamation Code for Mines in British Columbia Takla Lake First Nation (TLFN) mountain stability (2008) requires terrain stability risks and soil types to be characterized. The Project Area • TLFN community meeting (Mar. 16, (including the northern entrance to the tunnel and portal) does not overlap with terrain 2011) classified as unstable (Terrain and Soil Baseline Study, AuRico 2015). As a result of underground tunneling activities associated with the Kemess Underground Project (the KUG Project, the Project), there may be changes in the groundwater table, resulting in drier soil. Additionally, through the dewatering of the tunnels, soil may become drier, which may become erodible and less stable. It is expected that measures related to erosion prevention and sediment control will adequately manage potential risks. Emergency response plan Chapter 24 (Environmental Management Plans), Section 24.5 (Environmental Emergency, Kwadacha Nation (KwN) in the advent of Spill, and Hazardous Materials Plan) includes the proposed Emergency Response Plan • Kwadacha Community Meeting in Fort dam/Tailings Storage (ERP). The ERP provides the framework for the management of emergencies, including Ware, (April 7, 2011) as outlined in the Facility (TSF) failure to potential failure of the East Dam of the KUG Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) and outlines TKN memo to AuRico (Dec. 10, 2014) 1 include notification of procedures for containment, notification and mobilization.
  • Minister of Mines PROVINCE of BRITISH COLUMBIA

    Minister of Mines PROVINCE of BRITISH COLUMBIA

    Minister of Mines PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ANNUAL REPORT for the Year Ended 31s December 1959 BRITISH COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES VICTORIA, B.C. HON. W. K. KIERNAN, Minister. P. J. MULCAHY, Deputy Minister. J. W. PECK, Chief Inspector of Mines. S. METCALFE, Chief Analyst and Assayer. HARTLEY SARGENT, Chief, Mineralogical Branch. K. B. BLAKEY, Chief Gold Commissioner and Chief Commissioner. Petroleum and Natural Gas. J. D. LINEHAM, Chief, Petroleum and Natural Gas Conservation Branch. To His Honour FRANK MACKENZIE Ross, C.M.G., MC., LL.D., Lieutenant-Governor of the Province of British Columbia. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR: The Annual Report of the Mining industry of the Province for the year 1959 is herewith respectfully submitted. VI. K. KIERNAN, Minister of Mines. Minister of Mines Office, March 31st, 1960. Brian Terence O’Grady died at Victoria on July lZth, 1959, at the age of 76. He had been in the employ of the Department from 1920 until his retirement in April, 1948. He was very well known in the mining industry. Mr. O’Grady was born in Madras, India, and was educated in Eng- land at Wellington College and the Royal School of Mines. After three years in South Africa he came to Canada in 1907. From 1910 to 1913 he was engineer in charge of surveys for the Municipality of Victoria. He was on active service from 1914 to 1918, winning the Military Cross and the Serbian White Eagle. He joined the Department as Assistant Resident Mining Engineer at Revelstoke in 1920, became successively Resident Mining Engineer at Nelson and Vancouver, and from 193X was engaged in special work at Victoria.
  • Order of the Executive Director May 14, 2020

    Order of the Executive Director May 14, 2020

    PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Park Act Order of the Executive Director TO: Public Notice DATE: May 14, 2020 WHEREAS: A. This Order applies to all Crown land established or continued as a park, conservancy, recreation area, or ecological reserve under the Park Act, the Protected Areas of British Columbia Act or protected areas established under provisions of the Environment and Land Use Act. B. This Order is made in the public interest in response to the COVID-19 pandemic for the purposes of the protection of human health and safety. C. This Order is in regard to all public access, facilities or uses that exist in any of the lands mentioned in Section A above, and includes but is not limited to: campgrounds, day-use areas, trails, playgrounds, shelters, visitor centers, cabins, chalets, lodges, resort areas, group campsites, and all other facilities or lands owned or operated by or on behalf of BC Parks. D. This Order is in replacement of the Order of the Executive Director dated April 8, 2020 and is subject to further amendment, revocation or repeal as necessary to respond to changing circumstances around the COVID-19 pandemic. Exemptions that were issued in relation to the previous Order, and were still in effect, are carried forward and applied to this Order in the same manner and effect. Province of British Columbia Park Act Order of the Executive Director 1 E. The protection of park visitor health, the health of all BC Parks staff, Park Operators, contractors and permittees is the primary consideration in the making of this Order.
  • Salvelinus Confluentus) and Dolly Varden (S. Malma

    Salvelinus Confluentus) and Dolly Varden (S. Malma

    Molecular evidence of current and historical introgressive hybridization between bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) and Dolly Varden (S. malma) by ZOE REDENBACH B.Sc, University of British Columbia, 1997 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Zoology) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 2000 © Zoe Redenbach, 2000 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada DE-6 (2/88) ABSTRACT Natural hybridization, once thought to be relatively rare, has been widely observed in both plants and animals. Studies of species that hybridize at low rates across wide ranges, however, are still relatively rare. Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) and bull trout (S. confluentus) have widely overlapping ranges and have been shown to hybridize at two localities. This thesis is a molecular analysis of Dolly Varden / bull trout hybridization over a range of spatial scales. Large-scale mtDNA phylogeography revealed that Dolly Varden survived the last glaciation in a previously unsuspected refuge south of the ice sheet, which resulted in continuous sympatry of a Dolly Varden refugial population with bull trout over the last 100,000 years.
  • MANAGEMENT PLAN November 2003

    MANAGEMENT PLAN November 2003

    MANAGEMENT PLAN November 2003 for Stikine Country Protected Areas Mount Edziza Provincial Park Mount Edziza Protected Area (Proposed) Stikine River Provincial Park Spatsizi Plateau Wilderness Provincial Park Gladys Lake Ecological Reserve Ministry of Water, Land Pitman River Protected Area and Air Protection Environmental Stewardship Chukachida Protected Area Division Skeena Region Tatlatui Provincial Park Stikine Country Protected Areas M ANAGEMENT LAN P November 2003 Prepared by Skeena Region Environmental Stewardship Division Smithers BC Stikine Country Protected Areas Management Plan National Library of Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data British Columbia. Environmental Stewardship Division. Skeena Region. Stikine Country Protected Areas management plan Cover title: Management plan for Stikine Country Protected Areas. Issued by: Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection, Environmental Stewardship Division, Skeena Region. “November 2003” “Mount Edziza Provincial Park, Mount Edziza Protected Area (Proposed), Stikine River Provincial Park, Spatsizi Plateau Wilderness Provincial Park, Gladys Lake Ecological Reserve, Pitman River Protected Area, Chukachida Protected Area, Tatlatui Provincial Park”—Cover. Also available on the Internet. Includes bibliographical references: p. ISBN 0-7726-5124-8 1. Protected areas - British Columbia – Stikine Region. 2. Provincial parks and reserves - British Columbia – Stikine Region. 3. Ecosystem management - British Columbia – Stikine Region. I. British Columbia. Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection.
  • Fish 2002 Tec Doc Draft3

    Fish 2002 Tec Doc Draft3

    BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF WATER, LAND AND AIR PROTECTION - 2002 Environmental Indicator: Fish in British Columbia Primary Indicator: Conservation status of Steelhead Trout stocks rated as healthy, of conservation concern, and of extreme conservation concern. Selection of the Indicator: The conservation status of Steelhead Trout stocks is a state or condition indicator. It provides a direct measure of the condition of British Columbia’s Steelhead stocks. Steelhead Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) are highly valued by recreational anglers and play a locally important role in First Nations ceremonial, social and food fisheries. Because Steelhead Trout use both freshwater and marine ecosystems at different periods in their life cycle, it is difficult to separate effects of freshwater and marine habitat quality and freshwater and marine harvest mortality. Recent delcines, however, in southern stocks have been attributed to environmental change, rather than over-fishing because many of these stocks are not significantly harvested by sport or commercial fisheries. With respect to conseration risk, if a stock is over fished, it is designated as being of ‘conservation concern’. The term ‘extreme conservation concern’ is applied to stock if there is a probablity that the stock could be extirpated. Data and Sources: Table 1. Conservation Ratings of Steelhead Stock in British Columbia, 2000 Steelhead Stock Extreme Conservation Conservation Healthy Total (Conservation Unit Name) Concern Concern Bella Coola–Rivers Inlet 1 32 33 Boundary Bay 4 4 Burrard
  • GEOLOGY of the EARLY JURASSIC TOODOGGONE FORMATION and GOLD-SILVER DEPOSITS in the TOODOGGONE RIVER MAP AREA, NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA by Larry J

    GEOLOGY of the EARLY JURASSIC TOODOGGONE FORMATION and GOLD-SILVER DEPOSITS in the TOODOGGONE RIVER MAP AREA, NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA by Larry J

    Province of British Columbia MINERAL RESOURCES DIVISION Ministry oi Energy, Mines and Geological Survey Branch Petroleum Resources Hon. Anne Edwards, Minister GEOLOGY OF THE EARLY JURASSIC TOODOGGONE FORMATION AND GOLD-SILVER DEPOSITS IN THE TOODOGGONE RIVER MAP AREA, NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA By Larry J. Diakow, Andrejs Panteleyev, and Tom G. Schroeter BULLETIN 86 MINERAL RESOURCES DIVISION Geological Survey Branch Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Diakow, Larry, I. Geology of the early Jurassic Toodoggone Formation and gold-silvei depositsin the Toodoggone River map area, northern British Columbia VICTORIA BRITISH COLUMBIA (Bulletin, ISSN 0226-7497; 86) CANADA Issued by Geological Survey Branch. Includes bibliographical references: p January 1993 ISBNO-7718-9277-2 1. Geology - Stratigraphic - Jurassic. 2. Gold ores Geological researchfor this -Geology - British Columbia - Toodoggone River Region. 3. Silver ores - British Columbia - Toodoggone River publication was completed during Region. 4. Geology - British Columbia - Toodoggone the period 1981 to 1984. River Region. 5. Toodoggone Formation (B.C.) I. Fanteleyev, Andrejs, 1942- 11. Schroeter, T. G. In. British Columbia. Geological Survey Branch. IV. British Columbia. V. Title. VI. Series: Bulletin (British Columbia. Minisrry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources); 86. TN414C32B731992 551.7'66'0971185 C92-092349.6 Lawyers gold-silver deposit looking northwesterly with Amethyst Gold Breccia (AGB) and Cliff Creek (CC) zones indicated. Cheni Gold Mines camp is in the lower centre and the mill site at the left of the photograph. Flat-lying ash-flow tuffs of the Saunders Member (Unit 6) form the dissected plateauand scarps in the foreground. Silica-clay-alunite capping Alberts Hump, similar to nearby precious metal bearing advanced argillic altered rocks of the A1 deposit (AI), are barely visible to the north of Toodoggone River and 5 kilometres beyond Metsantan Mountain.
  • Water Quality in British Columbia

    Water Quality in British Columbia

    WATER and AIR MONITORING and REPORTING SECTION WATER, AIR and CLIMATE CHANGE BRANCH MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT Water Quality in British Columbia _______________ Objectives Attainment in 2004 Prepared by: Burke Phippen BWP Consulting Inc. November 2005 WATER QUALITY IN B.C. – OBJECTIVES ATTAINMENT IN 2004 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Water quality in British Columbia : Objectives attainment in ... -- 2004 -- Annual. Continues: The Attainment of ambient water quality objectives. ISNN 1194-515X ISNN 1195-6550 = Water quality in British Columbia 1. Water quality - Standards - British Columbia - Periodicals. I. B.C. Environment. Water Management Branch. TD227.B7W37 363.73’942’0218711 C93-092392-8 ii WATER, AIR AND CLIMATE CHANGE BRANCH – MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT WATER QUALITY IN B.C. – OBJECTIVES ATTAINMENT IN 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS......................................................................................................... III LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. VI LIST OF FIGURES................................................................................................................ VII SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................