The Devonian of the Bear River Range, Utah

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Devonian of the Bear River Range, Utah Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1928 The Devonian of the Bear River Range, Utah I. Lavell Cooley Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Cooley, I. Lavell, "The Devonian of the Bear River Range, Utah" (1928). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 5613. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5613 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i I -----------~-·-·--- AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE OF UTAH I .•nn. 8 •· ~· THE DEVONIAN OF THE BEAR RIVER RA NGE, UTAH I A DISSERTA TION SUBMITTED 'TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY I N GA NDIDAGY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE. I f@©'"li 'fi r'' ~· DEPARTUEN T OF GEOLOGY ,..,.,.,...-...... ~ · .il!" .. ·.::, ~ ' BY I. LAVELL COOLEY LOGAN,UTAH I JULY, 192t5. I I I ,, I s : 1 __ ie. ~· '! ~ . 1 ~_1 I C 0 N 'I' E N T S I I INTRODUCTION 'I PHYSIOGRAPHY STRUCTURE I STRATIGRAPHY Devonian System I 1. Location 1·,,, 2. Distribution ~-) .L B(! ~} __Thickness and Lithology I 4. Conditions of Deposition 5. Fossils I 6. Age and Correlation I With columnar section, graphic sections and photographs I I I I ---.-..-. ---··---------------' - ---- -.------- ---·- ---- ---- ----- ----- ------~-----------------' I tv . I ~ · I -2- INTRODUCTION I The geelogical column in northern Utah has haa very little detailed study~ Those Who have made re­ I ports on this section have done so only in a very general way, making no detailed sectio-ns of any part I of the column, excepting that of the Cambrian made I by Walcott. l Other work has been done by. Mansfield2 in southeastern Idaho and a general section of the I. Devonian made in Green Canyon, Bear River Range, Utah by Kinctl:le. 3 I Due to the lack of any detailed work of this nature being done in the Bear River Range, suggested the matter of making a section and describing the I .Devonian System of thi-s Fan.ge, because, probably less is known of this system than of any other one. I Stratigraphic relations were studied in several II seetions where outcrops were good. Conditions for the study of these outcrops are very favorable, because, I within a very short distance of 6 or 7 miles there are 6 canyons cutting the range at approximately right an- I gles to the general trend of the structure, giving satisfactory sections of the greater part of the Paleo- I zo·ic Era. Blacksmith Fork Canyon gives the best I 1 S'mi thsonian Miscellaneous P-apers # :53. --·------ --------2--F r ofess-:rona17aper- r r5z:---------------- - - ---------------------- _.) 3 ~ul. Am. Paleontology, vol. 4, No. 20, 190t), pp. 5-24; 1 ta) pp. 10-13; (b) pp. 15-16. I I - 3- I/_r ' I I section of the Devonian System in the area studied. I Because of easy aceess and good exposures, this aan- yon-was chosen for a graphic section. Another sec- I tion was made in Logan Canyon as a matter of compar- ison. .........-.•-, I A - A is a general graphic section of the front ridge of the Bear River Range, showing the structure I on the north side of Logan Canyon, situated almost (Plate II) I directly east of the city of Logan, Utah./ B - B is a general graphic section of the front ridge showing I the structure on the north side of Blacksmith Fork Canyon. These graphic sections constitute the gen- ~ -~) · - ----~---/ eral lithological character of that portion of the I Paleozoic Era which makes up this part of the Bear River Range. The eastern portion of the range is a I faulted anticline and is capped, uncomformably, by I Tertiary deposits. I I ti l I ' .. I I - "t- I I PHYSIOGRAPHY I The Bear River Range is a relatively rugged mass with the exception of the eastern portion which consti- I tutes a more or less plateau-like topography. The range is continuous with the Wasatch Range proper, and I is really a branch of the northern extremity of that I range. Geologically and ph·y Biographically that portion of the Wasatch Range from a position in the vicinity I of Huntsville, Utah, about latitude 4f 15' ~ and runs in an almost true north-south direction along the east I side of ·Cache Valley and terminates at Sheep Rock just south of the sharp bend of Bear River near Alexander, Idaho, is termed the Bear River Range (Plate I and I-A). I The other main branch of the Wasatch which forks off from about the same latitude and runs in the same I direction, but borders the west side of Cache Valley, I and terminates in a low, rolling topography at the point where Bear River passes through a gorge from I Cache Valley on it's way to Great Salt Lake, is the . Wellsville Range (Plate III.). This range has a very .. I sharp crest line which is almost impassable in places. The east slope of the range is almost a dip slope. / / ' I The Bear River Range as described above, has a I length of about 95 miles and varies in wid.th from 2 to ~~ )- ·· ---- ___ 22 mifes_;___ tb.e - maxT mum -wrcfEn- bei ng -aT ong--fJie--ri n e o e-=- ----- --'---- 1 -5- I ----) I· /'' I tween Tps 15 and 16 So. in southern Idaho. North of North of this line it grows narrower and terminates I at Sheep Rock. The range consists of two roughly I parallel ridges; the more rugged on the west called the Bear River front ridge, the lower plateau-like I mass to the east, the Wasatch Range. These ridges merge to the south in the Wasatch Range proper. I The Bear River front ridge is formed from a broad, I shallow, syncline with the highest portion along the axis of the syncline. The lower plateau-like Wasatch I Range to the east is a badly faulted anticline which is in part unconformably overlain with Tertiary con- I ) glomerate, sandstone and limestone. I The front ridge takes on a rugged topography with serrate crest line, steep ·slopes, gorge-like can- I yons, glaci~ted valley heads and pre£ents a steep and rugged front toward Cache Valley. I The highest peaks in the range are from north to I south; Paris Peak 9,572 feet, Sherman Peak 9,669 feet, in southern Idaho; Naomi Peak 9,980 feet, Logan Peak I 9,713 feet, in northern Utah. I I 1-----------------) -- ---~--- - -- -- --------------- ---- - I I - 6- I ( ·-'\ ) I STRUCTURE Over the immediate vicinity of the Bear River I Range with which thi~ paper is concerned, the rock I outcrops of the P aleozoic are very abundant and well defined. This condition is due partly to the Bear I River Range gravity fault and subsequent erosion, which has exposed the strata ranging from Cambriati to Penn- I sylvanian. I One very interesting feature which comes to the attention of the observer and which arouses his curio- I sity is the structure of the strata on the west limb of the broad shallow syncline, which makes up the front t~- - / ) ridge of the range. The strata have an average dip of I 18-20 degrees. At the mouth of Logan and Dry G.anyons, the gentle easterly dip of the strata is abruptly chang­ I ed, being sharply bent to a vertical and partially over- turned position, making the Ordovician and Silurian beds I occur in a reverse order (Plate IV a and b). Not only I is this spectacle of natural architecture of great inter- est, but associated with it is a zone in which the rocks I have lost their original form and are very badly brec:- .::, ciated and fractured. This impressive feature, together I with the finer observations of local folding and. buckl- ing of the thin-bedded incompetent formations bring a- I • I- - )--- -------- -- ----- - -- --- ------------ ----- - --- --- - - I -7- I I -·I' \ : I bout a conclusion that this area was subject to in- I tense compression, which obviously came before the brea.ki ng of the Bear River Range gravity fau 1 t. This I zone of fracture and folding extends up Logan c·anyon approximately 1000 feet. I Another impressive feature.of the range is the I clean-cut gorges which the major streams have made througjh the front ridge, exposing on both sides bare rock ledges I of which form a great part of the Paleozoic -Era. These continuous outcrops, layer upon layer, gently folded to I form the broad end shallow syncline, interrupted here and there where local faulting has occured, reveals to one l _) the great phenomena of mountain bu ilding and architecture. I Most of the streims in this portion of the Bear River Range have their source in the lower, eastern section and I flow west through the hi gher front ridge at a lmost right I angles to it's trend. A considerable amount of up-lift- ing of the range must have occured after the strea~s had I their courses pretty well defined. This condition is explained by the entrenched meanders occuring in the left I fork of Logan Canyon, in the vicinity of Temple Fork and I the superimposed appearance of the front ridge. I -- -·------ -------- ------- ----- ------ -- ---- -- - - - ---·- ---- ---------- ----- -----------:+,1 ~T ~ --~---- ------------ I '• I -tJ- I t \) I STRATIGRAPHY I The systems represented in the Bear River Range show little differentiation lithologically; the roak I being predominantly limestone and dolomite, with small amounts of sandstone, shales and quartzite.
Recommended publications
  • Final Biological Assessment
    REVISED BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Effects of the Modified Idaho Roadless Rule on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, Candidate, and Proposed Species for Terrestrial Wildlife, Aquatics, and Plants September 12, 2008 FINAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Effects of the Modified Idaho Roadless Rule on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, Candidate, and Proposed Species for Terrestrial Wildlife, Aquatics, and Plants Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................... 1 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL ACTION .................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Need..................................................................................................................................3 Description of the Project Area...............................................................................................................4 Modified Idaho Roadless Rule................................................................................................................6 Wild Land Recreation (WLR)...............................................................................................................6 Primitive (PRIM) and Special Areas of Historic and Tribal Significance (SAHTS)..............................7 Backcountry/ Restoration (Backcountry) (BCR)................................................................................10 General Forest, Rangeland,
    [Show full text]
  • Wolverines in Idaho 2014–2019
    Management Plan for the Conservation of Wolverines in Idaho 2014–2019 Prepared by IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME July 2014 2 Idaho Department of Fish & Game Recommended Citation: Idaho Department of Fish and Game. 2014. Management plan for the conservation of wolverines in Idaho. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, USA. Idaho Department of Fish and Game – Wolverine Planning Team: Becky Abel – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Southeast Region Bryan Aber – Regional Wildlife Biologist, Upper Snake Region Scott Bergen PhD – Senior Wildlife Research Biologist, Statewide, Pocatello William Bosworth – Regional Wildlife Biologist, Southwest Region Rob Cavallaro – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Upper Snake Region Rita D Dixon PhD – State Wildlife Action Plan Coordinator, Headquarters Diane Evans Mack – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, McCall Subregion Sonya J Knetter – Wildlife Diversity Program GIS Analyst, Headquarters Zach Lockyer – Regional Wildlife Biologist, Southeast Region Michael Lucid – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Panhandle Region Joel Sauder PhD – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Clearwater Region Ben Studer – Web and Digital Communications Lead, Headquarters Leona K Svancara PhD – Spatial Ecology Program Lead, Headquarters Beth Waterbury – Team Leader & Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Salmon Region Craig White PhD – Regional Wildlife Manager, Southwest Region Ross Winton – Regional Wildlife Diversity Biologist, Magic Valley Region Additional copies: Additional copies can be downloaded from the Idaho Department of Fish and Game website at fishandgame.idaho.gov/wolverine-conservation-plan Front Cover Photo: Composite photo: Wolverine photo by AYImages; background photo of the Beaverhead Mountains, Lemhi County, Idaho by Rob Spence, Greater Yellowstone Wolverine Program, Wildlife conservation Society. Back Cover Photo: Release of Wolverine F4, a study animal from the Central Idaho Winter Recreation/Wolverine Project, from a live trap north of McCall, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Miscellaneous Field Studies United States Geological Survey Map Mf-1566-A Pamphlet
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP MF-1566-A PAMPHLET MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF MOUNT NAOMI ROADLESS AREA, CACHE COUNTY, UTAH, AND FRANKLIN COUNTY, IDAHO By James H. Dover, U.S. Geological Survey and Philip R. Bigsby, U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and related acts, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a mineral survey of the Mount Naomi Roadless Area (04758), Wasatch and Caribou National Forests, Cache County, Utah, and Franklin County, Idaho. Mount Naomi Roadless Area was classified as a further planning area during the Second Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE n)i by the U.S. Forest Service, January 1979. MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL SUMMARY STATEMENT Geological, geophysical, and geochemical investigations have been conducted to assess the mineral resource potential of the Mount Naomi Roadless Area (hereafter referred to as "study area"), northeastern Utah and southeastern Idaho.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineral Resources of the Randolph Quadrangle, Utah -Wyoming
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 923 GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE RANDOLPH QUADRANGLE, UTAH -WYOMING BY G. B. RICHARDSON UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1941 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. O. ......... Price 55 cents HALL LIBRARY CONTENTS Pag* Abstract.____________--__-_-_-___-___-_---------------__----_____- 1 Introduction- ____________-__-___---__-_-_---_-_-----_----- -_______ 1 Topography. _____________________________________________________ 3 Bear River Range._.___---_-_---_-.---.---___-___-_-__________ 3 Bear River-Plateau___-_-----_-___-------_-_-____---___________ 5 Bear Lake-Valley..-_--_-._-_-__----__----_-_-__-_----____-____- 5 Bear River Valley.___---------_---____----_-_-__--_______'_____ 5 Crawford Mountains .________-_-___---____:.______-____________ 6 Descriptive geology.______-_____-___--__----- _-______--_-_-________ 6 Stratigraphy _ _________________________________________________ 7 Cambrian system.__________________________________________ 7 Brigham quartzite.____________________________________ 7 Langston limestone.___________________________________ 8 Ute limestone.__----_--____-----_-___-__--___________. 9 Blacksmith limestone._________________________________ 10 Bloomington formation..... _-_-_--___-____-_-_____-____ 11 Nounan limestone. _______-________ ____________________ 12 St. Charles limestone.. ---_------------------_--_-.-._ 13 Ordovician system._'_____________.___.__________________^__
    [Show full text]
  • Wasatch-Cache National Forest Plan
    ; The Stilt Volume 30, Is* October 2001 I Newsletter of the Bridgerland Audubon Society Wasatch-Cache National Forest Plan comments Comments on the proposed areas for winter non-motorized everywhere are being pushed Forest Plan and DEIS for the use and adopt an implementa• into smaller and smaller Wasatch-Cache National Forest tion plan for the eventuality that habitats. are due November 1. This latest they won't have adequate round of the Plan is much resources to monitor and patrol In 1999, the Forest Service improved from the preliminary to stop damaging uses. Motor• released the first pass at a new versions put forth in 1999 and ized recreationists have sent forest plan, the Preliminary 2000, but it still needs improve• hundreds of postcards, but Assessment of the Management ments — improvements that altogether, they're not worth one Situation, or PAMS. (Yes, this won't happen unless our voices well written letter. And it doesn't whole process overflows with are heard. The Forest Service is have to be Shakespearean jargon and acronyms, but it IS under great pressure from poetry, either. They want simple possible for the layperson to motorized recreationists and statements—dot points—that make sense of it.) BAS submit• livestock grazers to weaken spell out what you've seen, what ted comments summarized in environmental protections, but you want, and why it's important. the December 1999 issue of the our letters can offset many of Read on, then write that letter Stilt. In 2000, the USFS re• these pro-development TONIGHT! leased some draft alternatives, "postcard" responses.
    [Show full text]
  • Rmrs 2008 Rogers P001.Pdf
    Forest Ecology and Management 256 (2008) 1760–1770 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Lichen community change in response to succession in aspen forests of the southern Rocky Mountains Paul C. Rogers a,*, Ronald J. Ryel b a Western Aspen Alliance, Utah State University, Department of Wildland Resources, 5200 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322, USA b Utah State University, Department of Wildland Resources, 5200 Old Main Hill, Room 108, Logan, UT 84322, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: In western North America, quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) is the most common hardwood in Received 6 July 2007 montane landscapes. Fire suppression, grazing and wildlife management practices, and climate patterns Received in revised form 21 May 2008 of the past century are all potential threats to aspen coverage in this region. If aspen-dependent species Accepted 22 May 2008 are losing habitat, this raises concerns about their long-term viability. Though lichens have a rich history as air pollution indicators, we believe that they may also be useful as a metric of community diversity Keywords: associated with habitat change. We established 47 plots in the Bear River Range of northern Utah and Aspen southern Idaho to evaluate the effects of forest succession on epiphytic macrolichen communities. Plots Lichens Diversity were located in a narrow elevational belt (2134–2438 m) to minimize the known covariant effects of Community analysis elevation and moisture on lichen communities. Results show increasing total lichen diversity and a Succession decrease in aspen-dependent species as aspen forests succeed to conifer cover types.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural and Lithological Influences on the Tony Grove Alpine Karst
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2016 Structural and Lithological Influences on the onyT Grove Alpine Karst System, Bear River Range, North-Central Utah Kirsten Bahr Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Bahr, Kirsten, "Structural and Lithological Influences on the onyT Grove Alpine Karst System, Bear River Range, North-Central Utah" (2016). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 5015. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5015 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STRUCTURAL AND LITHOLOGICAL INFLUENCES ON THE TONY GROVE ALPINE KARST SYSTEM, BEAR RIVER RANGE, NORTH-CENTRAL UTAH by Kirsten Bahr A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Geology Approved: ______________________________ ______________________________ W. David Liddell, Ph.D. Robert Q. Oaks, Jr, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member ______________________________ ______________________________ Thomas E. Lachmar, Ph.D. Mark R. McLellan, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2016 ii Copyright © Kirsten Bahr 2016 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Structural and Lithological Influences on the Tony Grove Alpine Karst System, Bear River Range, North-Central Utah by Kirsten Bahr, Master of Science Utah State University, 2016 Major Professor: Dr. W.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Analysis of the Swan Peak Formation in the Bear River Range, North-Central Utah and Southeastern Idaho
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1969 Environmental Analysis of the Swan Peak Formation in the Bear River Range, North-Central Utah and Southeastern Idaho Philip L. VanDorston Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation VanDorston, Philip L., "Environmental Analysis of the Swan Peak Formation in the Bear River Range, North-Central Utah and Southeastern Idaho" (1969). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 3530. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/3530 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENVffiONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE SWAN PEAK FORMATION IN THE BEAR RTVER RANGE , NORTH-CENTRAL UTAH AND SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO by Philip L. VanDorston A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Geology UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 1969 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My sincerest appreciation is extended to Dr. Robert Q. Oaks, Jr. , for allowing me to develop the study along the directions I preferred, and for imposing few restrictions on the methodology, approach, and ensuing inter­ pretations. The assistance of Dr. J . Stewart Williams in identification of many of the fossils collected throughout the study was gratefully recetved. My appreciation is also extended to Dr. Raymond L. Kerns for assistance in obtaining the thin sections used in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Logan Canyon
    C A C H E V A L L E Y / B E A R L A K E Guide to the LOGAN CANYON NATIONAL SCENIC BYWAY 1 explorelogan.com C A C H E V A L L E Y / B E A R L A K E 31 SITES AND STOPS TABLE OF CONTENTS Site 1 Logan Ranger District 4 31 Site 2 Canyon Entrance 6 Site 3 Stokes Nature Center / River Trail 7 hether you travel by car, bicycle or on foot, a Site 4 Logan City Power Plant / Second Dam 8 Wjourney on the Logan Canyon National Scenic Site 5 Bridger Campground 9 Byway through the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Site 6 Spring Hollow / Third Dam 9 Site 7 Dewitt Picnic Area 10 offers an abundance of breathtaking natural beauty, Site 8 Wind Caves Trailhead 11 diverse recreational opportunities, and fascinating Site 9 Guinavah-Malibu 12 history. This journey can calm your heart, lift your Site 10 Card Picnic Area 13 Site 11 Chokecherry Picnic Area 13 spirit, and create wonderful memories. Located Site 12 Preston Valley Campground 14 approximately 90 miles north of Salt Lake City, this Site 13 Right Hand Fork / winding stretch of U.S. Hwy. 89 runs from the city of Lodge Campground 15 Site 14 Wood Camp / Jardine Juniper 16 Logan in beautiful Cache Valley to Garden City on Site 15 Logan Cave 17 the shores of the brilliant azure-blue waters of Bear Site 16 The Dugway 18 Lake. It passes through colorful fields of wildflowers, Site 17 Blind Hollow Trailhead 19 Site 18 Temple Fork / Old Ephraim’s Grave 19 between vertical limestone cliffs, and along rolling Site 19 Ricks Spring 21 streams brimming with trout.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Quality Classification and Recommended Septic Tank Soil- Absorption-System Density Maps, Cache Valley, Cache County, Utah
    GROUND-WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION AND RECOMMENDED SEPTIC TANK SOIL- ABSORPTION-SYSTEM DENSITY MAPS, CACHE VALLEY, CACHE COUNTY, UTAH by Mike Lowe, Janae Wallace, and Charles E. Bishop Utah Geological Survey Cover Photograph: flowing well in the Cache Valley discharge area. Photo by Janae Wallace. Although this product represents the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding its suitability for any particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product. ISBN 1-55791-686-1 SPECIAL STUDY 101 Utah Geological Survey a division of 2003 Utah Department of Natural Resources STATE OF UTAH Michael O. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Robert Morgan, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Richard G. Allis, Director UGS Board Member Representing Robert Robison (Chairman) ...................................................................................................... Minerals (Industrial) Geoffrey Bedell.............................................................................................................................. Minerals (Metals) Stephen Church .................................................................................................................... Minerals (Oil and Gas) E.H. Deedee O’Brien .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Logan Canyon Hiking Trail Guide Monique Beeley Monique Beeley Legend Trail Location Guide
    C a c h e V a l l e y V i s i t o r s B u r e a u Logan Canyon Hiking Trail Guide Monique Beeley Monique Beeley Legend Trail Location Guide WASATCH CACHE NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS PAVED WATER TRAILHEAD 9 r Rive ogan L White 7/8 Pine Lake Limber Tony Pine Grove 11 10 6 5 Trail 3 1 Highline Canal Right Hand Fo A-D 2/4 rk Left Hand Fork MAP 3 Legend maps not to scale for trails: 5 6 11 MAP 1 Urban Trails A-D CG Spring Hollow d Dam 3r CG Bridger 1 Mile Second Dam Second US Hwy 89 Hwy US ail ail Tr River Tr line h n l ai Hig een Canyon Canal Tr MAP 4 Gr Bon neville Sho Gateway reline Trail for trails: 7 8 9 10 N Logan Dry Canyon ovidence Canyo First Dam Pr 1900 E 1600 1600 Bonneville Shoreline Trail l ai E 1500 Tr Road Canyon Canyon MAP 2 for trails: 1 2 3 4 r Rive Logan BEFORE YOU GO EASY ACCESS URBAN TRAILS The trails on the maps are marked with their Forest There are four urban trails leaving from the First Dam Service trail numbers, for example: 047 parking lot. Trail difficulty depends on your health and physical A North. Logan Canyon to Green Canyon segment of the condition. Each trail map provides information on Bonneville Shoreline Trail. Go through the tunnel beginning and ending elevations to assist you. under the highway and follow the switchbacks up to the ancient shoreline.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermountain Trails
    Intermountain Trails USDA Forest Service—Intermountain Region August 2014 Volume 3, Issue 6 Forest In Focus: Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Forest Supervisor—Dave Whittekiend In this issue: The Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Forest in Focus 1 was recently recognized as the National Volunteer Program Unit of the Year. The Forest Supervisor Message forest hosted over 12,000 volunteers for a total of 83,196 hours of work. This volunteer Trail Stories workforce accomplishes a wide variety of work on the ground, from naturalist walks to Trail Stories 2 Notch Mountain trail construction and maintenance. Without Capitol this dedicated unpaid workforce, many of the Improvement Uinta-Wasatch-Cache Forest Supervisor, services our public expects and enjoys would Project Dave Whittekiend not exist. This incredible volunteer program is made possible by the dedicated and passionate National Public 3 Lands Day employees of the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache. Our volunteer coordinators are continuously making connections with people and projects. It could be linking Safety Tip dedicated hunters to a guzzler installation or showing a prospective Eagle Scout a Mount Naomi 4 trailhead in need of improvement. The UWC volunteer coordinators and the rest Wilderness of the employees on the forest are always willing to figure out how to include volunteers in managing this incredible resource we call the uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Uinta‐Wasatch‐Cache Wellsville 5 NaƟonal Forest Mountain 857 West South Jordan Parkway Wilderness South Jordan, Utah hƩp://www.fs.usda.gov/uwcnf/ High Uintas 6 Wilderness TRAIL STORIES Notch Mountain Capitol Improvement Project-see page 2 1 Notch Mountain Capitol Improvement Project Trail Stories Through the use of a State of Utah, Recreation Trails Program grant, the Heber-Kamas Ranger District has made significant improvements to the Notch Mountain Trail in the first year of the multi-year grant.
    [Show full text]