DOCSLIB.ORG

The Situation of Beef Performance Recording Results 1998

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Situation of Beef Performance Recording Results 1998 Comité international pour le contrôle des performances en élevage International committee for animal recording Internationales komitee für leistungsprüfungen in der tierproduction The situation of beef performance recording Results 1998 September 2000 Preface In 1994 the International Committee for Animal Recording (ICAR) adopted recommendations for beef performance recording. A specialist Beef Performance Working Group was asked to carry out surveys periodically to give an idea of the level of activity and the systems of beef performance recording among the member organisations, and of the degree of acceptance of its recommendations. The first survey was published in November 1997 and gave an overview of world-wide beef recording activities. The present survey was designed in 1999 and included an updated questionnaire asking for more detailed information, especially with regard to performance averages and breed differences. Overall, at present, it is clear that the responses to the new parts of the questionnaire were relatively poor. Some of the organisations approached argued that performance averages are misleading because they mainly reflect production conditions rather than the genetic merit of the breed and we must agree, to a certain extent, with this point. For this reason and with the aim not to discriminate against any breed that may be reared in poorer production conditions, this report includes only information about the extent of beef recording in different recording schemes. However, compared with the previous survey we have paid more attention to different recording activities performed by each of the cattle breeds. The questionnaire was subdivided into six main parts, of which each one dealt with one of the six different types of beef performance recording schemes approved by ICAR (the appropriate ICAR recommendation is shown in the annex): • in test stations; • in suckler herds from birth to weaning; • in abattoirs; • at official sales; • in finishing herds from weaning. As well as member organisations of ICAR we also tried to include as many other countries as possible in order to show a representative picture. As the reader can certainly conclude from the figures, some of the important beef breeding regions are unfortunately still missing. One of the reasons for this might have been problems with data ownership, as in many of the well developed beef breeding countries performance data rests with private breed societies. For this reason the next survey which will be carried out in 2002 will be shortened and facilitated. Besides this we will try to involve world breed societies which might have better access to their member organisations. By doing this we hope to get more and better responses. The present report has been a joint service of the ICAR Beef Performance Working Group. I take the opportunity and thank all of my colleagues for their valuable help and support. The data collection and evaluation was executed by Laurent Journaux, Institut de l’Élévage, France. For taking over this laborious work I would like to thank Mr. Journaux in particular. Munich, September 2000 Hans J. Schild Chairman of the ICAR Beef Performance Working Group THE SITUATION OF BEEF PERFORMANCE RECORDING, RESULTS 1998 ICAR, SEPTEMBER 2000 2 Country who received the questionnaire Austria France The Netherlands Argentina Finland New Zealand Australia Greece Portugal Belgium Hungary Poland Belgium Croatia Rumania Belgium Italy Korea Bulgaria Israel Sweden Canada India Slovenia Switzerland Ireland Slovak Republic Cyprus Japan Tunisia Czech Republic Luxembourg UK Germany Lithuania USA Denmark Latvia South Africa Spain Mexico Zimbabwe Estonia Norway Egypt Countries who answered to the questionnaire Countries without beef performance recording system Cyprus Mexico Netherlands Estonia Argentina (Milk recording Organisation) Tunisia Countries with beef performance recording Country In suckler In suckler In Official In In finishing herds herds individual sale abbattoirs herds Method 'A' Method 'B' test station Austria (AUS) Yes Yes Yes Australia No statistics available Belgium (BEL) Yes Yes Denmark (DEN) Yes Yes Yes Yes Finland (FIN) Yes France (FRA) Yes Yes Yes Yes Germany (DEU) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Hungary (HUN) Yes Yes Ireland (IRL) Yes Yes Yes Yes Italy (ITA) Yes Yes Latvia (LAT) Yes Poland (POL) Yes Switzerland (CHE) Yes Yes Yes South Africa (ZAF) Yes Yes Yes United Kingdom (UK) Yes Yes United States (USA) Yes THE SITUATION OF BEEF PERFORMANCE RECORDING, RESULTS 1998 ICAR, SEPTEMBER 2000 3 Number of records in each type of performance recording system In individual test station Total per country Number of Country Station Animals Scoring AUS 7 224 181 BEL 2 324 270 CHE 5 190 DEU 1378 1086 FRA 29 1364 2104 HUN 1 39 IRL 8 220 220 ITA 11 1383 733 ZAF 10 1428 Details per country and per breed Number of country Breed Station Animals Scoring AUS Brown Swiss (dual purpose - old type) 2 25 Limousin 1 18 Pinzgauer 1 10 10 Simmental (dual purpose) 3 171 171 BEL Belgian White Blue 2 324 270 CHE Brown Swiss 1 90 Brown Swiss (dual purpose - old type) 1 5 Red Cattle 1 30 Red Holstein 1 50 Simmental (dual purpose) 1 15 DEU 9. No breed distinction 2 10 10 Aberdeen Angus 1 1 1 Angler 1 21 20 Brown Swiss 1 49 49 Charolais 1 14 14 German Angus 1 15 Holstein 6 718 494 Limousin 1 40 40 Piemontese 1 5 5 Red Holstein 2 103 56 Simmental (beef) 1 4 4 Simmental (dual purpose) 4 369 364 Vorderwälder 1 29 29 THE SITUATION OF BEEF PERFORMANCE RECORDING, RESULTS 1998 ICAR, SEPTEMBER 2000 4 Number of country Breed Station Animals Scoring FRA Abondance 1 35 Aubrac 1 100 100 Bazadais 1 9 9 Blonde d'Aquitaine 2 200 200 Charolais 8 590 590 Gascon 1 77 77 Inra 95 1 18 18 Limousin 6 930 930 Maine-Anjou 1 60 60 Montbeliard 2 440 Normande 2 470 Parthenaise 1 45 45 Salers 1 75 75 Tarantaise 1 35 HUN Simmental (dual purpose) 1 39 IRL Aberdeen Angus 1 20 20 Belgian White Blue 1 1 1 Blonde d'Aquitaine 1 12 12 Charolais 1 45 45 Hereford 1 18 18 Limousin 1 83 83 Shorthorn (beef) 1 4 4 Simmental (beef) 1 37 37 ITA Italian Brown 1 139 96 Chianina 1 40 40 Marchigiana 1 54 54 Romagnola 1 37 37 Podolica 1 35 35 Maremmana 1 25 25 Piemontese 1 154 101 Limousine 1 42 42 Grigio Alpina 1 26 26 Rendena 1 59 33 Valdostana Pezzata Rossa 1 38 38 Valdostana Pezzata Nera + Castana 1 34 34 Pezzata Rossa Italiana 1 197 172 Italian Friesian 1 503 THE SITUATION OF BEEF PERFORMANCE RECORDING, RESULTS 1998 ICAR, SEPTEMBER 2000 5 Number of country Breed Station Animals Scoring ZAF Aberdeen Angus 10 42 Afrikaner 10 47 Beefmaster Bonsmara 10 706 Brahman 10 33 Brangus 10 28 Brown Swiss Charolais 10 33 Dexter-Kerry 1 Drakensberger 10 13 Gelbvieh (beef) 10 17 Hereford 10 19 Limousin 10 89 Nguni 2 Pinzgauer 10 17 Red Poll 10 10 Romagnola 1 Sanganer Santa Gertrudis 10 68 Shorthorn (beef) Simbra 10 54 Simmental (beef) 10 192 South Devon 10 12 Sussex 10 40 Tuli 4 THE SITUATION OF BEEF PERFORMANCE RECORDING, RESULTS 1998 ICAR, SEPTEMBER 2000 6 In suckler herds Method 'A' Total per country Number of Country Herds Animals Scoring AUS 261 BEL 3319 22726 13965 CHE 534 5510 DEU 52262 24472 FIN 177 3253 FRA 13413 489752 314000 IRL 366 2602 4 877 ITA 6610 104384 POL 271 14828 14800 Details per country and per breed Number of country Breed Herds Animals Scoring AUS Angus (Aberdeen and German Angus) 30 charolaisXAngus 1 SimmentalXLimousin 2 PinzgauerXBlonde d'Aquitaine 2 Belgian White Blue 1 Blonde d'Aquitaine 9 Charolais 137 Galloway 20 Gelbvieh (beef) 1 Limousin 24 Simmental (beef) 34 BEL Belgian White Blue 3319 22726 13965 CHE Crossbreeds 308 3702 Aberdeen Angus 124 1235 Aubrac 2 14 Blonde d'Aquitaine 3 10 Brown Swiss (dual purpose - old type) 4 5 Charolais 12 115 Galloway 2 7 Hereford 2 14 Highland Cattle 1 7 Limousin 52 287 Piemontese 3 7 Simmental (beef) 21 107 DEU German Angus 12541 5366 Charolais 21425 9848 Hereford 3352 2043 Limousin 8597 4404 Simmental (beef) 6347 2811 THE SITUATION OF BEEF PERFORMANCE RECORDING, RESULTS 1998 ICAR, SEPTEMBER 2000 7 Number of country Breed Herds Animals Scoring FIN Aberdeen Angus 33 648 0 Charolais 36 753 0 Hereford 64 1229 0 Highland Cattle 7 21 0 Limousin 21 322 0 Polled Hereford Look Hereford Simmental (beef) 16 280 0 FRA Parthenaise 227 7181 6000 Aubrac 694 32089 7300 Bazadais 81 996 100 Belgian White Blue 165 1952 0 Blonde d'Aquitaine 2728 68758 30600 Charolais 4770 204323 157000 Gascon 346 10238 2000 Hereford 150 Limousin 3039 122513 83600 Maine-Anjou 457 10519 6200 Salers 906 31033 21300 IRL Aberdeen Angus 44 197 Charolais 106 940 2144 Hereford 41 162 Limousin 126 1001 2733 Simmental (beef) 49 302 ITA Charolaise 110 4039 Chianina 733 18415 Limousine 165 7302 Marchigiana 3612 27849 Maremmana 47 3269 Pezzata Rossa Italiana 360 3146 Podolica 390 14853 Romagnola 805 9255 Sarda 337 14063 Sarda Modicana 51 2193 POL CROSSBRED WITH LMS 85 4314 4314 CROSSBRED WITH HEF 15 407 407 CROSSBRED WITH CHL 25 1082 1082 CROSSBRED WITH AAG 6 129 125 CROSSBRED WITH SIM 4 1108 1108 CROSSBRED WITH PMT 7 226 226 CROSSBRED WITH BAD 3 159 159 CROSSBRED WITH WEB 1 87 87 CROSSBRED WITH OTHERS 4 89 89 Aberdeen Angus 9 455 435 Charolais 25 1427 1427 Hereford 30 1909 1909 Limousin 43 2362 2362 Piemontese 5 140 140 Salers 5 644 640 Simmental (beef) 4 290 290 THE SITUATION OF BEEF PERFORMANCE RECORDING, RESULTS 1998 ICAR, SEPTEMBER 2000 8 In suckler herds Method ‘B’ Total per country Number of Country Herds Animals HUN 176 18526 LAT 41 728 UK 1170 19047 ZAF 1436 156834 DEN (estimation) 3200 25000 USA (estimation) 380000 Details per country and per breed Number of country Breed Herds Animals HUN Aberdeen
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Breed Codes for International Genetic Evaluation of Dairy and Beef Cattle Status: 2012-06-19 Assigned by Interbull
    Breed Codes for International Genetic Evaluation of dairy and beef cattle Status: 2012-06-19 Assigned by Interbull - Annex 1 Breed Breed Breed National Breed Code(1) Code(2) Names Annex 3-ch. 2-ch. Abondance ABO AB - Angus AAN AN 2.1 Aubrac AUB AU Ayrshire RDC AY 2.1 Belgian Blue BBL BB Blonde d'Aquitaine BAQ BD Beef Shorthorn BSH - Beefmaster BMA BM Belgium Red & White BER Braford BFD BO Brahman BRM BR Brangus BRG BN Brand Rood BRR British Frisian BRF Brown Swiss BSW BS 2.1 Chianina CIA CA Charolais CHA CH Dairy Shorthorn MSH - Dutch Frisian DFR Meuse Rhine Yssel MRY Dexter DXT DR Devon DEV - Dikbil DIK Eastern Flanders White Red BWR European Red Dairy Breed RDC RE 2.1 Gascon GAS - Glan Donnersberg GDB Galloway GLW GA 2.2 Guernsey GUE GU Gelbvieh GVH GV Groninger GRO Hereford HER - Highland Cattle HLA HI Holstein HOL HO 2.2 Holstein, Red and White RED RW 2.2 Jersey JER JE Kerry KER - Dutch Belted- Lakenvelder DBE Limousin LIM LM Longhorn LON - Rouge des Pres RDP - 2.2 Murray-Grey MGR MG Montbéliard MON MO Marchigiana MAR MR Maremmana MAE - Nellore NEL - Normandy NMD NO Norwegian Red RDC NR Parthenaise PAR - Piedmont PIE PI 2.2 Pinzgau PIN PZ Red Angus RAN - Romagnola ROM RN Salers SAL SL Santa Gertrudis SGE SG South Devon SDE SD Sussex SUS - Simmental Fleckvieh SIM SM 2.2 Swedish Red RDC SR Sahiwal SAH SW Tarentaise TAR TA Tux TUX Tyrol Grey TGR AL 2.2 Verbeter Roodbont VRB Wagyu WAG Belgium Blue Mixt WBL Welsh Black WBL WB Western Flanders Meat BRV West-Vlaams Rood BRD Witrik WRI (1) Interbull breed codes 2009 (2) Breed codes on bovine
    [Show full text]
  • Tesi Finale Dottorato
    INDICE GENERALE 1. INTRODUZIONE............................................................................................................................3 1.1. La tracciabilità dei prodotti di origine animale: alcuni elementi.........................................3 1.2. Elementi di genetica molecolare..........................................................................................4 1.2.1. I marcatori genetici.......................................................................................................4 1.2.2. Lo stato di avanzamento nello studio del genoma degli animali di interesse zootecnico...............................................................................................................................6 1.3. Tracciabilità dei prodotti di origine animale e genetica molecolare....................................8 1.4. I prodotti “monorazza”.......................................................................................................10 1.5. Genetica e biochimica del colore del mantello: alcuni elementi........................................16 1.6. Genetica molecolare e colore del mantello........................................................................19 1.6.1. Il gene MC1R nella specie bovina.............................................................................21 1.6.2. Il gene MC1R nella specie suina................................................................................26 1.6.3. Il gene KIT nella specie bovina..................................................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • On the Breeds of Cattle—Historic and Current Classifications
    University of Huddersfield Repository Felius, Marleen, Koolmees, Peter A., Theunissen, Bert, Lenstra, Johannes and Edwards, Ceiridwen J. On the Breeds of Cattle—Historic and Current Classifications Original Citation Felius, Marleen, Koolmees, Peter A., Theunissen, Bert, Lenstra, Johannes and Edwards, Ceiridwen J. (2011) On the Breeds of Cattle—Historic and Current Classifications. Diversity, 3 (4). pp. 660- 692. ISSN 1424-2818 This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/24931/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ Diversity 2011, 3, 660-692; doi:10.3390/d3040660 OPEN ACCESS diversity ISSN 1424-2818 www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity Review On the Breeds of Cattle—Historic and Current Classifications Marleen Felius 1, Peter A. Koolmees 2, Bert Theunissen 2, European Cattle Genetic Diversity Consortium † and Johannes A.
    [Show full text]
  • View of the Bulldog Toschisis [9, 11, 18]
    Struck et al. BMC Genetics (2018) 19:91 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-018-0678-8 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access A recessive lethal chondrodysplasia in a miniature zebu family results from an insertion affecting the chondroitin sulfat domain of aggrecan Ann-Kathrin Struck1, Claudia Dierks1, Marina Braun1, Maren Hellige2, Anna Wagner3, Bernd Oelmaier4, Andreas Beineke3, Julia Metzger1 and Ottmar Distl1* Abstract Background: Congenital skeletal malformations represent a heterogeneous group of disorders affecting bone and cartilage development. In cattle, particular chondrodysplastic forms have been identified in several miniature breeds. In this study, a phenotypic characterization was performed of an affected Miniature Zebu calf using computed tomography, necropsy and histopathological examinations, whole genome sequencing of the case and its parents on an Illumina NextSeq 500 in 2 × 150 bp paired-end mode and validation using Sanger sequencing and a Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR assay. Samples from the family of an affected Miniature Zebu with bulldog syndrome including parents and siblings, 42 healthy Miniature Zebu not related with members of the herd and 88 individuals from eight different taurine cattle breeds were available for validation. Results: A bulldog-like Miniature Zebu calf showing a large bulging head, a short and compressed body and extremely short and stocky limbs was delivered after a fetotomy. Computed tomography and necropsy revealed severe craniofacial abnormalities including a shortening of the ventral nasal conchae, a cleft hard palate, rotated limbs as well as malformed and fused vertebrae and ribs. Histopathologic examination showed a disorganization of the physeal cartilage with disorderly arranged chondrocytes in columns and a multifocal closed epiphyseal plate.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Genetics
    Domestic Animal Behavior ANSC 3318 BEHAVIORAL GENETICS Epigenetics Domestic Animal Behavior ANSC 3318 Dogs • Sex Differences • Breed Differences • Complete isolation (3rd to the 20th weeks) • Partial isolation (3rd to the 16th weeks) • Reaction to punishment Domestic Animal Behavior ANSC 3318 DOGS • Breed Differences • Signaling • Compared to wolves • Pedomorphosis • Sheep-guarding dogs HEELERS > HEADERS-STALKERS > OBJECT PLAYER >ADOLESCENTS Domestic Animal Behavior ANSC 3318 Dogs • Breed Differences • Learning ability • Forced training (CS) • reward training (BA) • problem solving (BA, BEA, CS) Basenjis (BA), beagles (BEA), cocker spaniels (CS), Shetland sheepdog (SH), wirehaired fox terriers (WH) Domestic Animal Behavior ANSC 3318 Dogs Behavioral Problems • Separation • Thunder phobia • Aggression • dominance (ESS) • possessive (cocker spaniel) • protective (German Shepherd) • fear aggression (German Shepherd, cocker spaniel, miniature poodles) Domestic Animal Behavior ANSC 3318 Dogs Potential factors associated with aggression • Area-related genetic difference • Dopamine D4 receptor • Other Neurotransmitter • Monoamine oxidase A • Serotonin dopamine metabolites • Gene polymorphisms (breed effects) • Glutamate transporter gene (Shiba Inu) • Tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine beta hydroxylase gene • Coat color • High heritability of aggression • Golden retrievers Domestic Animal Behavior ANSC 3318 Horses • Breed differences • dopamine D4 receptor • A or G allele? https://ker.com/equinews/hot-blood-warm- blood-cold-blood-horses/ Domestic
    [Show full text]
  • Relazione Attività Anno 2019
    Assemblea Generale dei Soci Cuneo, 30 settembre 2020 RELAZIONE TECNICA ANNO 2019 ASSOCIAZIONE REGIONALE ALLEVATORI DEL PIEMONTE Via Torre Roa, 13 12100 Madonna dell’Olmo - CUNEO www.arapiemonte.it 2 CARICHE SOCIALI Comitato Direttivo Chialva Roberto Presidente ARAP Presidente STA Cuneo Serra Franco Vice presidente Presidente STA Asti Odetti Paolo Vice presidente Presidente STA Torino Bongianino Roberto consigliere Presidente STA Vercelli e Biella Fortunato Mario consigliere Presidente STA Liguria Panizza Sergio consigliere Presidente STA Alessandria Parmigiani Simone consigliere Presidente STA Novara e VCO Dalmasso Elia consigliere Fassino Antonino consigliere Fiandino Davide consigliere Gianoglio Mario consigliere Fina Claudio consigliere Magliana Andrea consigliere Sanmartino Luca consigliere Viarengo Domenico consigliere Collegio Sindacale Morgese Vittorio Presidente Morabito Domenico sindaco effettivo Gallo Elena sindaco effettivo Probiviri Brondelli di Brondello Guido probiviro Salvini Elisabetta probiviro Bovetti Bartolomeo probiviro Direttore Valperga Tiziano 3 ASSOCIAZIONE ITALIANA ALLEVATORI Via XXIV Maggio n. 44/45, 00187 Roma SISTEMA ALLEVATORI DEL PIEMONTE ASSOCIAZIONE REGIONALE ALLEVATORI DEL PIEMONTE e STA* di CUNEO Via Torre Roa, 13, Madonna dell’Olmo – 12100 Cuneo – Tel. 0171/410.800 Fax 0171/ 413.863 e-mail: [email protected] Via dell’Artigianato, 1 – 12030 Monasterolo di Savigliano (CN) Tel. 0172/713972 Fax 0172/726348 e-mail: [email protected] STA di ALESSANDRIA Fraz. Gerlotti, via Casale 113 – 15122 Alessandria - Tel. 0131/1750290 Fax 0131/1750291 e-mail: [email protected] STA di ASTI Via Guttuari, 23 - 14100 Asti - Tel. 0141/530690 Fax 0141/530690 e-mail: [email protected] STA di NOVARA V.C.O. Corso Vercelli, 120 - 28100 Novara - Tel. 0321/453140 Fax 0321/453373 e-mail: [email protected] Regione Nosere - c/o Compl.
    [Show full text]
  • A Frameshift Mutation in GON4L Is Associated with Proportionate Dwarfism in Fleckvieh Cattle
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/036889; this version posted March 9, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. A frameshift mutation in GON4L is associated with proportionate dwarfism in Fleckvieh cattle Hermann Schwarzenbacher1, Christine Wurmser2, Krzysztof Flisikowski3, Lubica Misurova4, Simone Jung2,*, Martin C. Langenmayer5,#, Angelika Schnieke3, Gabriela Knubben-Schweizer4, Ruedi Fries2, Hubert Pausch2,$ 1 ZuchtData EDV-Dienstleistungen GmbH, 1200 Vienna, Austria 2 Chair of Animal Breeding, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, 85354 Freising, Germany 3 Chair of Animal Biotechnology, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, 85354 Freising, Germany 4 Clinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services at the Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany 5 Institute of Veterinary Pathology at the Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, 80539 Muenchen, Germany * present address: Bayern Genetik GmbH, 85586 Poing, Germany # present address: Institute for Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Ludwigs- Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, 80539 München $ corresponding author: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/036889; this version posted March 9, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Abstract Background Low birth weight and postnatal growth restriction are the most evident symptoms of dwarfism.
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint Report
    EXHIBIT A ARKANSAS LIVESTOCK & POULTRY COMMISSION #1 NATURAL RESOURCES DR. LITTLE ROCK, AR 72205 501-907-2400 Complaint Report Type of Complaint Received By Date Assigned To COMPLAINANT PREMISES VISITED/SUSPECTED VIOLATOR Name Name Address Address City City Phone Phone Inspector/Investigator's Findings: Signed Date Return to Heath Harris, Field Supervisor DP-7/DP-46 SPECIAL MATERIALS & MARKETPLACE SAMPLE REPORT ARKANSAS STATE PLANT BOARD Pesticide Division #1 Natural Resources Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 Insp. # Case # Lab # DATE: Sampled: Received: Reported: Sampled At Address GPS Coordinates: N W This block to be used for Marketplace Samples only Manufacturer Address City/State/Zip Brand Name: EPA Reg. #: EPA Est. #: Lot #: Container Type: # on Hand Wt./Size #Sampled Circle appropriate description: [Non-Slurry Liquid] [Slurry Liquid] [Dust] [Granular] [Other] Other Sample Soil Vegetation (describe) Description: (Place check in Water Clothing (describe) appropriate square) Use Dilution Other (describe) Formulation Dilution Rate as mixed Analysis Requested: (Use common pesticide name) Guarantee in Tank (if use dilution) Chain of Custody Date Received by (Received for Lab) Inspector Name Inspector (Print) Signature Check box if Dealer desires copy of completed analysis 9 ARKANSAS LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY COMMISSION #1 Natural Resources Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 (501) 225-1598 REPORT ON FLEA MARKETS OR SALES CHECKED Poultry to be tested for pullorum typhoid are: exotic chickens, upland birds (chickens, pheasants, pea fowl, and backyard chickens). Must be identified with a leg band, wing band, or tattoo. Exemptions are those from a certified free NPIP flock or 90-day certificate test for pullorum typhoid. Water fowl need not test for pullorum typhoid unless they originate from out of state.
    [Show full text]
  • Different Beef Breed Cattle Fattening Results Analysis
    AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES (CROP SCIENCES, ANIMAL SCIENCES) DIFFERENT BEEF BREED CATTLE FATTENING RESULTS ANALYSIS Inga Muižniece, Daina Kairiša Latvia University of Agriculture [email protected] Abstract In Latvia, different breeds of beef cattle are grown; therefore, it is important to explain their suitability to organic farming systems, because most Latvian beef cattle breeders work with organic farming methods. The aim of this research was to compare fattening of different beef breed bulls (Bos Taurus) in organic farming system at similar housing and feeding conditions. In the research, there were included Blonde d’Aquitaine (BA), Hereford (HE), Simmental (SI) and crossbred (CB) bulls. Fattening period started after calf weaning from suckler cows at 7 – 8 months of age. Fattening results were significantly affected by factors like breed, live weight and age before fattening, but slaughter results were significantly affected by breed, live weight and age before slaughter. During the fattening period the biggest daily weight gain was showed for SI breed bulls (849 g), but the biggest live weight increase was recognized for BA breed bulls (295 kg). The required slaughter weight the fastest was reached for XG bulls, which average slaughter age was 532 days (p<0.05). The greatest slaughter weight – 342 kg (p<0.05) and dressing percentage (58% (p<0.05)) was recognized for BA breed bulls; also, carcass conformation score in muscle development was the highest for BA bulls (2.0 points (p<0.05)). The greatest economic benefit was from CB bulls, income calculated per one rearing day from CB bulls was - EUR 1.80. Key words: beef cattle breeds, bulls, growth and fattening.
    [Show full text]
  • ACE Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA August 13, 2021 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes .................................................................................................................................................... 4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes ........................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ................................................................................................... 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes .......................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers ........................................................................ 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ............................................................................................................................. 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers ........................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure ...................................................................................................................................... 30 PG05 – Scientific Species Code ........................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Caratterizzazione Genetica Di Diverse Razze Bovine Tramite Un Set Di 128 Snps DNA Fingerprinting of Different Cattle Breeds Using a Set of 128 Snps
    Caratterizzazione genetica di diverse razze bovine tramite un set di 128 SNPs DNA fingerprinting of different cattle breeds using a set of 128 SNPs A. Pozzi1, S. Arabi1, C. Previtali1, R. Capoferri1, A. Galli2, M. Montedoro1 e G. Bongioni1 1 Istituto Sperimentale Italiano “L. Spallanzani” Rivolta d’Adda (Cremona), IT [email protected] 2 CREA Centro di ricerca Zootecnia e Acquacoltura (Lodi, IT) L’Italia grazie alla sua storia, alle sue tradizioni ed alla tipologia del territorio è un Paese particolarmente ricco di biodiversità: si contano oltre 200 razze zootecniche adattatesi nei secoli a produrre in ambienti diversificati per clima e vegetazione. La conservazione della biodiversità delle specie zootecniche è universalmente riconosciuta come una priorità importante, sia per aspetti ecologici, sociali e culturali, sia per il mantenimento del territorio, delle comunità rurali e delle tradizioni. La ricerca in ambito genetico-molecolare e le innovazioni tecnologiche possono essere un valido strumento a tutela della biodiversità. Oggetto di questo studio è stata la caratterizzazione di 20 razze bovine presenti in Italia, al fine di valutarne la diversità genetica tramite approccio molecolare, con l’utilizzo di un chip a 128 SNPs su piattaforma Open Array: 88 SNPs sono stati individuati nel pannello proposto per ISAG Bovine Comparison Test 2011 e, i restanti 40, nel database dbSNP dell’NCBI. Complessivamente sono stati analizzati 513 soggetti appartenenti alle 20 razze (25 campioni per razza) di seguito elencate: Bruna Alpina, Frisona, Valdostana Pezzata Rossa, Pezzata Rossa Italiana, Piemontese, Reggiana, Rendena, Grigia, Pinzgauer, Jersey, Valdostana Pezzata Nera, Charolaise, Marchigiana, Chianina, Limousine, Romagnola, Castana, Blue Belga, Montbeillarde, Blonde d’Aquitaine.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Razze Di Bovini Da Carne in Veneto
    a cura del SETTORE STUDI ECONOMICI ottobre 2011 I dati della BANCA NAZIONALE dell’ANAGRAFE ZOOTECNICA del MINISTERO DELLA SALUTE istituita presso l’I.Z.S. ABRUZZO E MOLISE, sede di TERAMO INDICE INTRODUZIONE .......................................................................................................................... 2 PREMESSA ................................................................................................................................... 4 IL PATRIMONIO BOVINO ............................................................................................... 5 I DATI ISTAT ............................................................................................................................... 5 IL PATRIMONIO BOVINO VENETO ......................................................................... 8 I DATI DELL’ANAGRAFE BOVINA ......................................................................................... 8 LE RAZZE DA CARNE ............................................................................................................. 13 L’ANDAMENTO MENSILE DELLA NUMEROSITA’ ........................................................... 16 REDAZIONE .............................................................................................................................. 17 1 INTRODUZIONE Questo report di analisi è centrato principalmente sui dati disponibili presso la banca dati dell’Anagrafe Nazionale Zootecnica del Ministero della Salute, consultabili liberamente e direttamente via internet. La
    [Show full text]