Printable Species Checklist Only (PDF)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
57 HUMMINGBIRDS 1 PLAIN-CAPPED STARTHROAT Heliomaster Constantii 11.5–12.5Cm Field Notes: Often Makes Low Sallies to Capture Flying Insects
Copyrighted Material 57 HUMMINGBIRDS 1 PLAIN-CAPPED STARTHROAT Heliomaster constantii 11.5–12.5cm field notes: Often makes low sallies to capture flying insects. voice: A loud peek; song transcribed as chip chip chip chip pi-chip chip chip..., or chi chi chi chi whit-it chi.... habitat: Shrubby, arid woodland, woodland edge and thickets. distribution: Rare vagrant from Mexico. 2 BAHAMA WOODSTAR Calliphlox evelynae 8–9.5cm field notes: Female has buff tips on outermost tail feathers. Feeds on nectar and by hawked insects. voice: A dry prititidee prititidee prititidee; also a sharp tit titit tit titit, which often speeds into a rattle. habitat: Mixed pine forests, forest edge, clearings, scrub and large gardens. distribution: Very rare vagrant from the Bahamas. 3 LUCIFER HUMMINGBIRD Calothorax lucifer 9–10cm field notes: Male has 3 a forked tail. Feeds on nectar and insects which are obtained by brief fly-catching sallies. voice: Twittering chips. habitat: Desert areas with agave, mountain slopes and canyons. distribution: Summers in SW Texas and S Arizona. 4 RUBY-THROATED HUMMINGBIRD Archilochus colubris 8–9.5cm field notes: Feeds on nectar; insects are taken during fly-catching sallies. voice: 4 A squeaking cric-cric. habitat: Woodland edge, copse and gardens. distribution: Summers in E USA and S Canada, from Alberta eastwards. 5 BLACK-CHINNED HUMMINGBIRD Archilochus alexandri 10cm field notes: Female very similar to Ruby-throated Hummingbird. voice: A husky tiup, tiv or tipip. 5 Song is a weak warble. habitat: Dry scrub. distribution: Summers in W and SW USA. 6 ANNA’S HUMMINGBIRD Calypte anna 10–11cm field notes: Feeds on nectar and insects, which are gleaned or hawked. -
Dungeness National Wildlife Refuge Watchable Wildlife Introduction
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Dungeness National Wildlife Refuge Watchable Wildlife Introduction Home for Wildlife Dungeness National Wildlife Refuge Summer brings nesting songbirds to was set aside by executive order the forested and grass uplands and on in 1915 as a refuge, preserve, and to the spits. Often visitors see harbor breeding ground for native birds. seals swimming in the marine waters Located in the northwest corner of and hauling out on shore to rest and Washington State on the Salish Sea, nurse their pups within the protection approximately 60 miles northwest of of the Refuge boundaries. Visitors have Seattle, it offers a diversified habitat also spotted other marine mammals, of sand beaches, protected bay such as orca and minke whales, in the waters, seagrass beds, mudflats, and Refuge waters. forested and grass uplands. About this The following fish and wildlife species Good wildlife viewing opportunities Checklist list includes 244 species of birds, 29 occur throughout the year on the Refuge. species of mammals, 8 species of In winter, the area is important to sea reptiles and amphibians, and 26 species ducks and other waterfowl who feed of fish that are found on the Refuge. and find storm shelter in the Since most birds are migratory, their protected waters of Dungeness Bay. seasonal occurrence and abundance, as The Bay remains an well as associated habitats are coded. important migration stop The list was prepared with the and wintering ground for assistance of Bob Boekelheide, Rod brant. Many shorebird Norvell and other knowledgeable species also feed on the birders. If you see something rare or shorelines and mudflats unusual, please share the information during the spring and fall with the Refuge biologist. -
Poster-Native Plants for Hummingbirds
Think tall. Hummingbirds nest on Planning your garden – the branches of tall shrubs and trees, which provide cover and escape from predators. think like a hummingbird. Think safe harbor. Think diverse. Plant a diversity Domestic cats can kill Think perches. Hummingbirds of flowering species with abundant hummingbirds. Please pollen and nectar. Think native. Hummers are spend much of their time perched on keep them indoors. best adapted to local, native dead branches and dead tree tops— plants, which often need less resting or surveying their territory. Think chemical free. water than ornamentals. Pesticides and insecticides Think showy. Flowers kill insect pollinators and can should bloom in your Think patience. It takes time for native harm hummingbirds. garden throughout the plants to grow and for hummers to find your growing season. Plant garden, especially if you live far from wild willow, currant, and lands. columbine for spring, and aster, salvia, and Think bountiful. Plant big goldenrod for fall patches of each plant species flowers. for better foraging efficiency. Think aware. Observe hummingbirds when you walk outside in nature. Notice which flowers attract them. Think friendly. Create hummingbird-friendly gardens both at home, at schools and in public parks. Help people learn more about hummingbirds and native plants. Calliope Hummingbird feeding on scarlet paintbrush Think a little messy. Most insects nest underground or in leafy debris so avoid using weed cloth or heavy mulch. More insects mean more food for hummingbirds. Think water. Hummingbirds U.S. Forest Service will bathe in dripping water, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. shallow creeks and even garden Washington, DC 20250 sprinklers. -
Maintaining and Improving Habitat for Hummingbirds in Colorado, Wyoming and South Dakota
United States Department of Agriculture Maintaining and Improving Habitat for Hummingbirds in Colorado, Wyoming and South Dakota A Land Manager’s Guide Forest Service National Headquarters Introduction Food Hummingbirds play an important role in the food web, Hummingbirds feed by day on nectar pollinating a variety of owering plants, some of which from owers, including annuals, perenni- are speci cally adapted to pollination by hummingbirds. als, trees, shrubs, and vines. Native nectar Some hummingbirds are at risk, like other pollinators, plants are listed in the table near the end due to habitat loss, changes in the distribution and of this guide. ey feed while hovering or, abundance of nectar plants (which are a ected by climate if possible, while perched. ey also eat change), the spread of invasive plants, and pesticide use. Rufous Hummingbird nest insects, such as fruit- ies and gnats, and is guide is intended to help you provide and improve Courtesy of Martin Hutten will consume tree sap, when it is available. habitat for hummingbirds, as well as other pollinators, ey obtain tree sap from sap wells drilled in Colorado, Wyoming, and South Dakota. While hummingbirds, like all birds, have the in trees by sapsuckers and other hole-drill- Western columbine—Aquilegia formosa Courtesy of Gary A. Monroe basic habitat needs of food, water, shelter, and space, this guide is focused on providing ing birds. USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database food—the plants that provide nectar for hummingbirds. Because climate, geology, and vegetation vary widely in di erent areas, speci c recommendations are presented for each ecoregion in Colorado, Wyoming, and South Dakota. -
Breeding Ecology of Pigeon Guillemots (Cepphus Columba) on Alcatraz Island, California
BREEDING ECOLOGY OF PIGEON GUILLEMOTS (CEPPHUS COLUMBA) ON ALCATRAZ ISLAND, CALIFORNIA A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University A S In partial fulfillment of the requirements for polfc the Degree - Masters of Arts In Geography: Resource Management and Environmental Planning by Victoria Leslie Seher San Francisco, California August 2016 Copyright by Victoria Leslie Seher 2016 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read Breeding Ecology of Pigeon Guillemots (Cepphus columbaj on Alcatraz Island, California by Victoria Leslie Seher, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Master of Arts in Geography: Resource Management and Environmental Planning at San Francisco State University. Benjamin Becker, Ph.D. National Park Service BREEDING ECOLOGY OF PIGEON GUILLEMOTS (CEPPHUS COLUMBA) ON ALCATRAZ ISLAND, CALIFORNIA Victoria Leslie Seher San Francisco, California 2016 This study compared the breeding ecology and diet of Pigeon Guillemots (Cepphus columba) from an urban estuarine colony (Alcatraz Island) and a remote oceanic colony (Southeast Farallon Island) to better understand how spatial differences and current management influence the two colonies. I used video cameras inside nest sites to help monitor the breeding phenology, reproductive success, and prey delivered to chicks on Alcatraz Island in 2015 and 2016. Data collected in this study were compared with data collected by Point Blue Conservation Science on Southeast Farallon Island. Results show similarities in breeding phenology between the two colonies, although the breeding start date was earlier on Alcatraz in 2016 by 12 days. Productivity was higher on Alcatraz in both years with 0.73 and 0.83 fledged chicks/pair while productivity dropped on Southeast Farallon Island from 0.65 fledged chicks/pair in 2015 to 0.30 fledged chicks/pair in 2016. -
Thurston County Species List
Washington Gap Analysis Project 202 Species Predicted or Breeding in: Thurston County CODE COMMON NAME Amphibians RACAT Bullfrog RHCAS Cascade torrent salamander ENES Ensatina AMMA Long-toed salamander AMGR Northwestern salamander RAPR Oregon spotted frog DITE Pacific giant salamander PSRE Pacific treefrog (Chorus frog) RAAU Red-legged frog TAGR Roughskin newt ASTR Tailed frog PLVA Van Dyke's salamander PLVE Western redback salamander BUBO Western toad Birds BOLE American bittern FUAM American coot COBR American crow CIME American dipper CATR American goldfinch FASP American kestrel TUMI American robin HALE Bald eagle COFA Band-tailed pigeon HIRU Barn swallow STVA Barred owl CEAL Belted kingfisher THBE Bewick's wren PAAT Black-capped chickadee PHME Black-headed grosbeak ELLE Black-shouldered kite (White-tailed kite DENI Black-throated gray warbler DEOB Blue grouse ANDI Blue-winged teal EUCY Brewer's blackbird CEAM Brown creeper MOAT Brown-headed cowbird PSMI Bushtit CACAL California quail BRCA Canada goose VISO Cassin's vireo (Solitary vireo) BOCE Cedar waxwing PARU Chestnut-backed chickadee SPPA Chipping sparrow NatureMapping 2007 Washington Gap Analysis Project ANCY Cinnamon teal HIPY Cliff swallow TYAL Common barn-owl MERME Common merganser CHMI Common nighthawk COCOR Common raven GAGA Common snipe GETR Common yellowthroat ACCO Cooper's hawk JUHY Dark-eyed (Oregon) junco PIPU Downy woodpecker STVU European starling COVE Evening grosbeak PAIL Fox sparrow ANST Gadwall AQCH Golden eagle RESA Golden-crowned kinglet PECA Gray jay ARHE Great -
Pigeon Guillemot Study DELIVERABLES for TASK NO
County: Island Grant No: PROJECT TITLE: Pigeon Guillemot Study DELIVERABLES FOR TASK NO: PROGRESS REPORT: [ ] PROJECT FINAL REPORT: [ X ] PERIOD COVERED: June-Aug 2013 DATE SUBMITTED: This project has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Pigeon Guillemot Study Whidbey Island, Washington 2013 Breeding Season Kelly L. Zupich Guillemot Research Group Abstract On Whidbey Island, Washington, three Pigeon Guillemot colonies were studied from June 25th, 2013 to August 31st, 2013 during breeding/nesting season. This is the fifth year of study. Pigeon Guillemots are the only seabird that regularly nest on Whidbey Island and remain in the Salish Sea year-round. The diet and behavior of these seabirds makes them an ideal indicator of the condition of the Salish Sea. The objective of this study is to establish baseline data on the population of Pigeon Guillemots on Whidbey Island. The colonies were monitored and data recorded on prey fed to chicks, fledging success, and population. The three colonies involved are Shore Meadows, Mutiny Sands, and Rolling Hills. The average prey choice for all three colonies was 63% gunnel, 29% sculpin, and 8% other. Fledging success in 2013 averaged 55%. Average population was forty five PIGUs at Shore Meadows, fourteen at Mutiny Sands, and nineteen at Rolling Hills. PIGU-Pigeon Guillemot Introduction Pigeon Guillemots (Cepphus columba) are medium sized seabirds of the Alcidae family. -
Notes on the Location and Construction of the Nest of the Calliope Hummingbird with Three Illustrations
Jan.,1927 19 NOTES ON THE LOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEST OF THE CALLIOPE HUMMINGBIRD WITH THREE ILLUSTRATIONS By WINTON WEYDEMEYER SSUMING that the nesting habits of the Calliope Hummingbird throughout A the northwesternmost county of Montana, where it is a common breeder, may largely be typical of the species, I give here information obtained in studying this bird in that locality and in examining a few more than twenty nests. In Lincoln County the Calliope Hummingbird (Stellula calliope) nests along streams throughout most of the Canadian zone and downward into the upper borders of the Transition zone. During the nesting season and late summer it also frequents open mountains, ranging into the Hudsonian zone, and during May and August is commonly seen in the breeding areas of lower Transition zone species. Tree associ- ations evidently have greater influence on its range than does elevation. In the east- ern part of the county I have found the species to be common during the nesting season at 7000 feet, although I have never chanced actually to see a nest above 4800 feet. In the Kootenai Valley, near Libby, I have found it nesting abundantly at an elevation Fig. 10. TRANSITION ZONE TYPE OF HABITAT OF THE CALLIOPE HUMMINGBIRD, ALONG THE K~~TENAI RIVER NEAR LIBBY, MONTANA, AT AN ELEVATION OF 2160 FEET. of less than 2100 feet, and I have no doubt that it breeds below 1900 feet a few miles distant, in the lower end of the valley, the only place in Montana where so low an elevation occurs. -
SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does Not Include Alcidae
SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does not include Alcidae CREATED BY AZA CHARADRIIFORMES TAXON ADVISORY GROUP IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Charadriiformes Taxon Advisory Group. (2014). Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: October 2013 Authors and Significant Contributors: Aimee Greenebaum: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Vice Chair, Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Alex Waier: Milwaukee County Zoo, USA Carol Hendrickson: Birmingham Zoo, USA Cindy Pinger: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Chair, Birmingham Zoo, USA CJ McCarty: Oregon Coast Aquarium, USA Heidi Cline: Alaska SeaLife Center, USA Jamie Ries: Central Park Zoo, USA Joe Barkowski: Sedgwick County Zoo, USA Kim Wanders: Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Mary Carlson: Charadriiformes Program Advisor, Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Perry: Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Crook-Martin: Buttonwood Park Zoo, USA Shana R. Lavin, Ph.D.,Wildlife Nutrition Fellow University of Florida, Dept. of Animal Sciences , Walt Disney World Animal Programs Dr. Stephanie McCain: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Veterinarian Advisor, DVM, Birmingham Zoo, USA Phil King: Assiniboine Park Zoo, Canada Reviewers: Dr. Mike Murray (Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA) John C. Anderson (Seattle Aquarium volunteer) Kristina Neuman (Point Blue Conservation Science) Sarah Saunders (Conservation Biology Graduate Program,University of Minnesota) AZA Staff Editors: Maya Seaman, MS, Animal Care Manual Editing Consultant Candice Dorsey, PhD, Director of Animal Programs Debborah Luke, PhD, Vice President, Conservation & Science Cover Photo Credits: Jeff Pribble Disclaimer: This manual presents a compilation of knowledge provided by recognized animal experts based on the current science, practice, and technology of animal management. -
Mt. Tabor Park Bird List
Species s S F W Species s S F W Jays & Crows Warblers (continued) *Steller’s Jay c c c f Blackpoll Warbler x *Western Scrub-Jay c c c c MacGillivray’s Warbler u o Mt. Tabor Park *American Crow c c c c *Wilson’s Warbler c o c Swallows Hooded Warbler x Tree Swallow r r Tanagers Bird List Violet-green Swallow f f f *Western Tanager c u u x Northern Rough-winged Swallow x Summer Tanager x Cliff Swallow r r Sparrows *Barn Swallow c c c *Spotted Towhee c c c u Purple Martin x x Chipping Sparrow o r Chickadees Savannah Sparrow x *Black-capped Chickadee c c c c Fox Sparrow f f f *Chestnut-backed Chickadee c c c c *Song Sparrow c c c c Bushtits Lincoln’s Sparrow o r *Bushtit c c c c White-throated Sparrow r r r Nuthatches *White-crowned Sparrow u o u r *Red-breasted Nuthatch c c c c Golden-crowned Sparrow f f f Creepers *Dark-eyed Junco c c c c *Brown Creeper c c c c Grosbeaks Wrens *Black-headed Grosbeak f f f *Bewick’s Wren c c c c Rose-breasted Grosbeak x House Wren x x Buntings *Winter Wren c o c c Lazuli Bunting r x Kinglets Blackbirds Golden-crowned Kinglet c u c c Brewer’s Blackbird x x x x Ruby-crowned Kinglet c c c Red-winged Blackbird x x Thrushes Brown-headed Cowbird f f u Townsend’s Solitaire u r r Orioles Portland, OR Swainson’s Thrush c o c Bullock’s Oriole r x Hermit Thrush c c f Finches *American Robin c c c c Purple Finch f u r Varied Thrush c c c *House Finch c c c c Starlings Red Crossbill u o o o Illustrated and compiled by European Starling f f f f *Pine Siskin f u f f Adrian Hinkle Waxwings *Lesser Goldfinch c c c u January -
Submarine Foraging Behavior of Alcids in an Artificial Environment
Zoo Biology 6:373-378 (1987) Submarine Foraging Behavior of Alcids in an Artificial Environment David Cameron Duffy, Frank S. Todd, and W.R. Siegfried Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa (D.C.D., WR.S.); Hubbs Sea World Research Institute, San Diego, California (F.S. T.) We used an artificial environment at Sea World, Inc, San Diego, to study under water foraging behavior of a1cids. Larger birds dove longer and had greater wing beat frequencies. The pigeon guillemot Cepphus columba was the only species to use both feet and wings for propulsion; all others used just wings. Aggressive interactions underwater were common. Competition among alcids in the wild may occur primarily underwater, and artificial environments may be the best means to study such interactions. Key words: captivity, competition, diving, foraging INTRODUCTION The study of foraging by seabirds in their natural environments is extremely difficult as they can rarely be observed directly below the surface. Inferences con cerning foraging, based on surface observations, may lead to ambiguous results. For example, Cody [1973] concluded that differences in foraging range, rather than diet or foraging depth, facilitated partitioning of food resources between species in alcid communities off the Olympic Peninsula, Washington, and off Iceland. Bedard [1976] questioned Cody's findings but did not present alternative explanations for possible partitioning of resources. We suggest that, because alcids normally capture prey below the surface of the sea [Ashmole, 1971; Bradstreet and Brown, 1985], studies of the birds' submarine foraging behavior are needed. We report here an initial study of foraging by seven alcid species kept at Sea World, Inc, San Diego, in an artificial enclosure that attempts to simulate their natural environment. -
Oregon Birds
Oregon Birds Journal of Oregon Birding and Field Ornithology Volume 35 2009 Contents of Oregon Birds Volume 35 Birding Oregon I.D. Note: Storms and Wrecked Phalaropes Dave Irons 7 Local News and Notes Don Munson, Forrest English, Alan Contreras, Hendrik Herlyn 3 New Generations: Oregon's Young Birders Karl Fairchild 4 Field Notes: Summer 2008-Dec. 2009 South Coast - Tim Rodenkirk 11 North Coast - Wink Cross 18 Portland Metro - Christopher and Adrian Hinkle 23 Willamette Valley - Tom Mickel 28 Rogue-Umpqua - selected photos 31 Central Oregon - Chuck Gates 33 Klamath-Lake - Kevin Spencer 39 Harney-Malheur - selected photos 43 Umatilla - Aaron Skirvin 45 Aberrant leucistic plover: three photos by Anne Heyerly 1 7 Oregon listing report for 2009 compiled by Paul Sullivan 50 Recent Research Use of Himalayan Blackberry Patches by Wintering Birds in Western Oregon Noah K. Strycker, Jonathan V. Boydston, Jasmine D. Graves, Laci L. Bristow, Bruce D. Dugger 57 Lewis's Woodpecker Nesting Study in Central Oregon Kirk Hardie 61 A Brief History of Seabird Research on Southern Oregon's Saddle Rock Annie Pollard 67 A Note on the Feeding Behaviors of Wintering Mergansers Ron Larson 74 Front Cover: Cedar Waxwings. Photo by Knute Andersson (Langlois) Back Cover: Red-naped Sapsucker. Photo by Rowan Heglie (Ashland) Contact OB Editor Alan Contreras at [email protected] Coming in Oregon Birds 36(1) - deadline July 1, 2010 Motorless birding by Vjera Thompson Site Guide: Chukar Park by David Smith A Truly Big Year in Coos County by Tim Rodenkirk Oregon's First Record of White-eyed Vireo by Alan Contreras and Graham Floyd and more...