An Investigation Into Abuse and Assault of Route Bus Drivers: Statistics, Triggers, Risk Reduction, Training, and Opportunities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Investigation Into Abuse and Assault of Route Bus Drivers: Statistics, Triggers, Risk Reduction, Training, and Opportunities An Investigation into Abuse and Assault of Route Bus Drivers: Statistics, triggers, risk reduction, training, and opportunities. Stuart Dawson Parry Serafim Chris Lowe Bus Association Victoria Inc. June 2017 Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction and overview ..................................................................................................................... 5 Part 1 – The abuse and assault of Victorian route bus drivers. .............................................................. 7 Part 2 - Official data for the physical and verbal assault of bus drivers ............................................... 13 Part 3 – Triggers for abuse and assault ................................................................................................. 19 Part 4 - The legislative framework for passenger behaviour and farebox compliance ........................ 25 Part 5 – Physical risk reduction (engineering) measures ...................................................................... 28 Part 6 – Driver training in respect of passenger conflict and farebox compliance ............................... 33 Part 7 – Fare Evasion - A Quantitative Study ........................................................................................ 42 Part 8 - Industry comments: strengths, weaknesses, challenges and opportunities ........................... 54 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................ 58 Appendix 1: Bus Operator Interview Transcripts, February-March 2017 ............................................. 59 Appendix 2 – Non-Operator Agencies .................................................................................................. 96 Appendix 3 - Key Interview topics Analytic Grid ................................................................................. 102 Appendix 4: Legislation impacting drivers in respect of passenger behaviour and ticketing ............ 103 References .......................................................................................................................................... 105 Contributors Stuart Dawson is Accreditation Liaison Manager at Bus Association Victoria Inc., and an Adjunct Research Fellow in the School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Monash University. Parry Serafim is the Manager, Planning and Industry Development at Bus Association Victoria Inc. Chris Lowe is Executive Director of the Bus Association Victoria Inc. 2 Acknowledgements We thank the members and Board of BusVic for seeing and supporting the need for this work to be undertaken. We also thank the 16 contracted BusVic member and non-member bus operators and their various staff members who generously availed their time and interest to participate in the group interviews and some follow-up enquiries on which this project was based. We also wish to thank the TWU Vic/Tas organisers, and members of the Authorised Officer Bus Pool, for the same interest and willingness to participate in this project. We thank Stephen Turner, Director Bus Safety, Transport Safety Victoria, for his willing communications on incident reporting, and for providing the latest official data. We also thank PTV for providing the myki top-up information and charts. We additionally wish to thank Robyn Lincoln (Associate Professor of Criminology, Bond University), for her interest in, and email correspondence on, some criminological aspects of this research. BusVic Bus Association Victoria Inc. (BusVic) is the voluntary professional association for bus and coach operators and suppliers. BusVic is committed to working in partnership with all stakeholders involved in raising the level of safety, integrity and effectiveness of the Victorian route bus system and the level of the professional and ethical behaviour of bus operators. The triggers, ramifications and solutions to verbal abuse and physical assault of route bus drivers has been of significant and material focus to BusVic, global practitioners and academics of late and this work aims to make a contribution to that narrative. 3 Executive Summary This report reviews the extent of verbal abuse and physical assault of Victorian route bus drivers, which increased significantly over the past three years. It explains why the official data dramatically understates the extent of aggression, essentially because it was never set up to capture it, and provides a sound basis to realistically estimate the extent of aggression to drivers. This shows that physical assault is some 20 times, and verbal abuse some 4000 times, higher than TSV data suggest. It ranks the triggers for abuse and assault, and summarises the legislation under which operators manage drivers, passenger behaviour, and fare collection. It reviews industry responses to the problem of rising incidences of passenger aggression, including physical (engineering) risk reduction methods. It reviews the adequacy of bus driver training in respect of passenger interaction and farebox compliance, which is inconsistent and problematic. It reports the results of a qualitative investigation into these issues specifically for bus, which has not previously been attempted. This report also presents a fare evasion study, the results of which suggests that fare evasion on Melbourne's route bus network is presently being understated. The introduction provides an overview of the background, objectives, and methodology for this investigation and report, which represents the first qualitative research into the triggers of, and extent of, aggression toward bus drivers that has been conducted anywhere in the bus industry. Part 1 sets out what is known and not known about aggression towards bus drivers, and establishes a link between fare non-compliance and increasing levels of aggression over the past three years. Part 2 explains the basis of TSV’s official incident data, and why it shows only a fraction of assaults on drivers. It then provides a sound basis to estimate the true extent of aggression toward drivers. Part 3 sets out and discusses the triggers of aggression identified by the interviewed operators. Apart from the two primary triggers of ticketing and late running, these are not ranked in order of frequency or severity. Levels of aggression may vary both geographically and demographically. Part 4 critically examines how current legislation, which imposes a range of expectations and duties on bus drivers, impacts upon their role, and makes them into frequent victims of aggression. Part 5 evaluates physical measures that have been implemented to varying extents, which are intended to reduce the risk of aggression to drivers, or increase their confidence in their own safety. Part 6 examines operator approaches to bus driver training in respect of passenger interaction, conflict, and farebox issues. It will be seen that training is heavily impacted by the climate of risk of assault in which drivers work. Part 7 presents a quantitative fare evasion study that challenges the true extent of fare evasion on Melbourne's route bus network. Bus Association Victoria Inc engaged a resource to ride on multiple metropolitan route bus services 5 days a week for 6 weeks over April and May 2017 and count how many passengers touched on with their myki smartcard and how many didn't. The results suggest that fare non compliance on the metropolitan bus network is much higher than is being reported by PTV. Part 8 offers BAV industry comments on some key issues that emerged from this investigation. 4 Recommendations have been made in respect of the matters investigated, based on the analysis that follows each section. The most urgent need is dialogue about how to address increasing tension between bus driver safety and farebox compliance, which requires immediate legislative action. Introduction and overview Background: Concerns about rising incidences of verbal abuse and physical assault of bus drivers have been raised by Bus Association Victoria (BAV), bus operators and drivers, the Transport Workers Union (TWU), and in media reports, for several years. In 2013, the reasons for this rise were not clear, its impact little explored, and, bar a small number of incidents classifiable as criminal assault, its extent mostly unknown. In 2014, BAV initiated research by MentalHealth@Work that surveyed aggression toward Victorian bus drivers as one element of a broader study, primarily focussed on their mental health and contributing risk factors. It did not distinguish between verbal and physical aggression, correctly seeing their impact as part of a continuum of psychological damage. However, research conducted for the present report revealed that this and related distinctions vitally inform drivers’ attitudes to reporting abuse and assault to operators. The study recommended further research into aggression, including its actual rather than perceived rate; the impact of myki on interactions with drivers, and how incidents of aggression might be reduced, including by driver training. BAV commissioned a second study, Prevention of Aggression to Bus Drivers, which reviewed a range of literature to do with workplace aggression, including that first study,
Recommended publications
  • TTF Smartcard Ticketing on Public Transport 2010
    Tourism & Transport Forum (TTF) Position Paper Smartcard ticketing on public transport July 2010 Tourism & Transport Forum (TTF) is a national, Member‐funded CEO forum, advocating the public policy interests of the 200 most prestigious corporations and institutions in the Australian tourism, transport, aviation & investment sectors. CONTENTS OVERVIEW 2 SMARTCARD TECHNOLOGY 3 ADVANTAGES OF SMARTCARD TICKETING 3 CHALLENGES FOR IMPLEMENTATION 6 SMARTCARD TICKETING IN AUSTRALIA 8 SMARTCARD TICKETING INTERNATIONALLY 10 INNOVATION IN SMARTCARD TECHNOLOGY 12 LOOKING AHEAD 14 CONCLUDING REMARKS 14 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: CAROLINE WILKIE NATIONAL MANAGER, AVIATION & TRANSPORT TOURISM & TRANSPORT FORUM (TTF) P | 02 9240 2000 E | [email protected] www.ttf.org.au In short: 1. Smartcard ticketing provides convenience for commuters and efficiency gains for transport service providers. 2. Smartcard systems have been introduced in Australian cities with varying degrees of success. 3. International experience suggests that successful implementation may take many years, and difficulties are commonplace. 4. Overall, the benefits of smartcard ticketing overwhelmingly outweigh the costs and challenges that may arise in implementation. Overview Smartcard technology is being implemented around the world as a substitute for cash transactions in various capacities. When applied to public transport fare collection, smartcards eliminate the need for commuters to queue for tickets and reduce the burden on transport providers to process fare transactions. In recent years, benefits such as decreased travel times and general convenience to commuters have driven a shift towards smartcard ticketing systems on public transport systems in Australia and around the world. As well as providing more efficient transport services to commuters, smartcard ticketing systems enable service providers and transit authorities to collect comprehensive data on the travel behaviour of commuters.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from Melbourne Is a Monthly Public Affairs Bulletin, a Simple Précis, Distilling and Interpreting Mother Nature
    SavingLETTER you time. A monthly newsletter distilling FROM public policy and government decisionsMELBOURNE which affect business opportunities in Australia and beyond. Saving you time. A monthly newsletter distilling public policy and government decisions which affect business opportunities in Australia and beyond. p11-14: Special Melbourne Opera insert Issue 161 Our New Year Edition 16 December 2010 to 13 January 2011 INSIDE Auditing the state’s affairs Auditor (VAGO) also busy Child care and mental health focus Human rights changes Labor leader no socialist. Myki musings. Decision imminent. Comrie leads Victorian floods Federal health challenge/changes And other big (regional) rail inquiry HealthSmart also in the news challenge Baillieu team appointments New water minister busy Windsor still in the news 16 DECEMBER 2010 to 13 JANUARY 2011 14 Collins Street EDITORIAL Melbourne, 3000 Victoria, Australia Our government warming up. P 03 9654 1300 Even some supporters of the Baillieu government have commented that it is getting off to a slow F 03 9654 1165 start. The fact is that all ministers need a chief of staff and specialist and other advisers in order to [email protected] properly interface with the civil service, as they apply their new policies and different administration www.letterfromcanberra.com.au emphases. These folk have to come from somewhere and the better they are, the longer it can take for them to leave their current employment wherever that might be and settle down into a government office in Melbourne. Editor Alistair Urquhart Some stakeholders in various industries are becoming frustrated, finding it difficult to get the Associate Editor Gabriel Phipps Subscription Manager Camilla Orr-Thomson interaction they need with a relevant minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Fredericton on the Move Fredericton Transit Strategic Plan 2018
    Fredericton on the Move Fredericton Transit Strategic Plan 2018 Final Report Prepared for Fredericton Transit Prepared by Stantec November 2018 Final Report Fredericton on the Move Fredericton Transit Strategic Plan 2018 November 12, 2018 Prepared for: Fredericton Transit Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Transit Advisory TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I 1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION REVIEW 5 1.3 MARKET CONDITIONS 11 1.4 SYSTEM COMPARISON 26 1.5 ROUTE PERFORMANCE 35 2.0 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 40 2.1 STAKEHOLDER ACTIVITIES 40 2.2 PREVALENT THEMES AND CONCERNS 43 2.3 SURVEY RESULTS 44 3.0 GAPS ANALYSIS 56 3.1 SERVICE PLANNING AND OPERATIONS 56 3.2 TECHNOLOGY 56 3.3 FARES 57 3.4 PARTNERSHIPS 58 3.5 MARKETING 59 3.6 FLEET 59 4.0 SERVICE PLANNING AND OPERATIONS 61 4.1 CURRENT NETWORK 61 4.2 NORTH SIDE HUB EVALUATION 65 4.3 PARK-AND-RIDE EVALUATION 72 4.4 SUNDAY SERVICE EVALUATION 83 4.5 ROUTING EVALUATION 94 5.0 TECHNOLOGY 114 5.1 CURRENT TECHNOLOGY APPROACH 114 5.2 FUTURE TECHNOLOGY PROSPECTS 116 5.3 TECHNOLOGY RECOMMENDATIONS 122 6.0 FARES 127 6.1 CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE 127 6.2 FARE PROSPECTS 135 6.3 FARE RECOMMENDATIONS 142 7.0 PARTNERSHIPS 147 7.1 CURRENT PARTNERSHIPS 147 7.2 PARTNERSHIP PROSPECTS 147 7.3 PARTNERSHIPS RECOMMENDATION 150 8.0 MARKETING 151 8.1 CURRENT MARKETING APPROACH 151 8.2 MARKETING PROSPECTS 154 8.3 MARKETING RECOMMENDATIONS 160 9.0 FLEET 162 9.1 CURRENT FLEET 162 9.2 FLEET PROSPECTS 162 9.3 FLEET RECOMMENDATIONS 164 9.4 FACILITY CONSIDERATIONS 167 10.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA 169 10.1 ABOUT PERFORMANCE CRITERIA 169 10.2 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA RECOMMENDATIONS 174 11.0 MOVING FORWARD 175 11.1 SUMMARY OF SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS (0-2 YEARS) 175 11.2 SUMMARY OF MEDIUM-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS (3-5 YEARS) 177 11.3 SUMMARY OF LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS (5+ YEARS) 179 12.0 APPENDICES 183 12.1 THE NORTH AMERICAN BUS MARKET 183 12.2 FREDERICTON TRANSIT SURVEY QUESTIONS 189 FIGURES Figure 1 City wards of Fredericton.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC TRANSPORT OMBUDSMAN LIMITED Annual Report 2010-2011
    PUBLIC PUBLIC TRANSPORT OMBUDSMAN TRANSPORT LIMITED OMBUDSMAN LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2010-2011 Public Transport Ombudsman Annual Report 2010/2011 1 1,838 Cases received Cases finalised 1,835 finalised 91% cases 2,568 finalised in31 days Issues registered Complaints investigated and finalised 247 complaints involving 410 issues Our mission 95% conciliated / The mission of the Public resolved by agreement Transport Ombudsman (PTO) is to receive, investigate 3% withdrawn and facilitate the resolution 2% not investigated / of complaints and disputes further investigated between users of public passenger transport services in Victoria and members of the PTO scheme, where the public transport operators have been unable to resolve the complaint in the first instance. Our mission is founded on Index principles of independence, natural justice, access, equity, effectiveness, accountability 3 From the Chair and community awareness. 4 From the Ombudsman 5 About the PTO scheme 6 Accessing the PTO Glossary of terms 7 Accessibility and awareness of the PTO ANZOA Australia & New Zealand 9 myki and the PTO Ombudsman Association 11 Complaint handling AO Authorised Officer AORTA Authorised Officer Regulation, 19 Benchmarking our complaint handling Training and Accreditation unit 20 Better public transport services DoT Department of Transport 22 Effective relationships IDR Internal dispute resolution 25 Continual improvement - the new “business as usual”! PTO Public Transport Ombudsman RTM Refer to Member 26 Scheme member case activity RFIE Refer for Internal Escalation 27 Summary financial statements TTA Transport Ticketing Authority 2 Public Transport Ombudsman Annual Report 2010/2011 From the Chair The PTO’s history since its creation in The PTO continued to work proactively 2004 reflects Victoria’s changing public with all members of the scheme, with transport system.
    [Show full text]
  • 112 Infrastructure Inquiry FINAL
    PUBLIC ACCOUNTS AND ESTIMATES COMMITTEE 112th Report to Parliament Inquiry into Effective Decision Making for the Successful Delivery of Significant Infrastructure Projects December 2012 Ordered to be printed No. 205 By Authority Session 2010‑12 Government Printer for the State of Victoria CONTACT INFORMATION Address: Parliament of Victoria Spring Street EAST MELBOURNE VICTORIA, 3002 Telephone: +61 3 8682 2867 Facsimile: +61 3 8682 2898 Email: [email protected] Web: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/paec The following images used in this Report are reproduced with permission and copyrighted by their respective owners, as follows: myki logo – image on page 141; Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre ‑ photograph on front cover and page 169; Ethan Rohloff (Royal Children’s Hospital) – photograph on front cover and page 184; Victorian Desalination Plant – photograph on front cover and page 198; and Melbourne Markets Authority – photograph on front cover and page 220. Parliament of Victoria Public Accounts and Estimates Committee Inquiry into Effective Decision Making for the Successful Delivery of Significant Infrastructure Projects ISBN 978 0 9871550 9 2 ii CONTENTS Duties of the Committee � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �xi Terms of Reference � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � xiii Acronyms and Abbreviations � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � xv Chairman’s Foreword � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Urban Transport Master Plan City of Windhoek
    Sustainable Urban Transport Master Plan City of Windhoek Final - Main Report 1 Master Plan of City of Windhoek including Rehoboth, Okahandja and Hosea Kutako International Airport The responsibility of the project and its implementation lies with the Ministry of Works and Transport and the City of Windhoek Project Team: 1. Ministry of Works and Transport Cedric Limbo Consultancy services provided by Angeline Simana- Paulo Damien Mabengo Chris Fikunawa 2. City of Windhoek Ludwig Narib George Mujiwa Mayumbelo Clarence Rupingena Browny Mutrifa Horst Lisse Adam Eiseb 3. Polytechnic of Namibia 4. GIZ in consortium with Prof. Dr. Heinrich Semar Frederik Strompen Gregor Schmorl Immanuel Shipanga 5. Consulting Team Dipl.-Volksw. Angelika Zwicky Dr. Kenneth Odero Dr. Niklas Sieber James Scheepers Jaco de Vries Adri van de Wetering Dr. Carsten Schürmann, Prof. Dr. Werner Rothengatter Roloef Wittink Dipl.-Ing. Olaf Scholtz-Knobloch Dr. Carsten Simonis Editors: Fatima Heidersbach, Frederik Strompen Contact: Cedric Limbo Ministry of Works and Transport Head Office Building 6719 Bell St Snyman Circle Windhoek Clarence Rupingena City of Windhoek Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH P.O Box 8016 Windhoek,Namibia, www.sutp.org Cover photo: F Strompen, Young Designers Advertising Layout: Frederik Strompen Windhoek, 15/05/2013 2 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 15 1.1. Purpose ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Asset Management Guide Supplement: Asset Category Overviews & Lifecycle Management Update
    Asset Management Guide Supplement: Asset Category Overviews & Lifecycle Management Update Original October 2012 Update September 2019 FTA Report No. 0138 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. UPDATED BY U.S. DOT Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Cambridge Systematics COVER PHOTO Image courtesy of U.S. Department of Transportation DISCLAIMER This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products of manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Asset Management Guide Supplement: Asset Category Overviews & Lifecycle Management Update SEPTEMBER 2019 FTA Report No. 0138 PREPARED BY Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. One Penn Plaza New York, NY 11019 UPDATED BY U.S. DOT Volpe National Transportation Systems Center 55 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Cambridge Systematics 101 Station Landing, Suite 410 Medford, MA 02155 AVAILABLE ONLINE https://www.transit.dot.gov/about/research-innovation FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i MetricMetric Conversion Conversion Table Table Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg megagrams T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 Mg (or "t") (or "metric ton") TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) 5 (F-32)/9 oF Fahrenheit Celsius oC or (F-32)/1.8 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION iv FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No.
    [Show full text]
  • This Print Covers Calendar Item No.: 13
    THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO.: 13 SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DIVISION: Finance and Information Technology BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Approving the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 and FY 2022 Operating Budget in the amounts of $1,283.8 million in FY 2021 and $1,336.9 million in FY 2022; including use of fund balance; authorizing changes to various fines, fees, fares, rates, and charges including free Muni for all youth under 19 years old and free Muni for individuals experiencing homelessness, and authorizing Sunday and evening parking meter enforcement;; amending the Transportation Code to address fees and penalties for FY 2021 and FY 2022, including a waiver of taxi fees for FY 2021 and FY 2022, reducing the low-income boot removal fee, creating a new one-time boot removal fee for individuals experiencing homelessness, establishing reduced tow fees for low-income individuals and individuals experiencing homelessness; approving the SFMTA’s FY 2021 and FY 2022 Capital Budget in the amounts of $559.8 million in FY 2021 and $553 million in FY 2022, funding projects within ten capital programs; retroactively waiving taxi driver permit renewal fees due between March 16, 2020 and June 30, 2020; authorizing the Director to make technical or clerical adjustments of up to ten percent; and authorizing the Director to work with the City Controller to conform the SFMTA’s budgets to any change in citywide budget submission schedules the Mayor adjusts through an emergency declaration to ensure that interim appropriations are available for the SFMTA to continue operations after July 1, 2020 until October 1, 2020, when the SFMTA budget for the period ending June 30, 2022 will be finally operative.
    [Show full text]
  • Fit 5111- Information Systems Development Practice
    FIT 5111- INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT PRACTICE Assignment 2: MYKI SYSTEM CASE STUDY Submitted on: 19th May, 2010 Submitted by: Vaqar Khan - 21832188 Gihan Degambada - Prasannakumar Palani - Kim Phung Tran - FIT-5111: MYKI System TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 4 1. RICH PICTURE.......................................................................................................... 5 2. PROBLEMS AND PROBLEM OWNERS.................................................................. 7 3. POLITICAL AND CULTURAL ANALYSIS................................................................. 8 POLITICAL ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 8 SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ANALYSIS .......................................................................... 9 4. RELEVANT SYSTEM .............................................................................................. 10 5. ROOT DEFINITION, CATWOE AND CONCEPTUAL DIAGRAM.......................... 11 COMMUTERS POINT OF VIEW ................................................................................. 11 TTA POINT OF VIEW .................................................................................................. 13 KAMCO POINT OF VIEW...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Boards of Directors
    MEETINGS OF THE Boards of Directors Valley Metro RPTA METRO Light Rail MEETING DATE MEETING DATE Thursday, February 19, 2015 Thursday, February 19, 2015 TIME TIME 12:15 p.m. 1:15 p.m. LOCATION Valley Metro RPTA Lake Powell Conference Room 101 N. 1st Avenue, 10th Floor Phoenix VALLEY METRO • 101 N 1ST AVE • STE 1300 • PHOENIX AZ • 85003 • 602-262-7433 February 12, 2015 Board of Directors Thursday, February 19, 2015 Lake Powell Conference Room 101 N. 1st Avenue, 10th Floor 12:15 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance will be recited. Action Recommended 1. Public Comment 1. For information A 15-minute opportunity will be provided to members of the public at the beginning of the meeting to address the Board on all agenda items. The Chair may recognize members of the public during the meeting at his/her discretion. Up to three minutes will be provided per speaker or a total of 15 minutes total for all speakers. 2. Minutes 2. For action Minutes from the January 22, 2015 Board meeting are presented for approval. 3. Chief Executive Officer’s Report 3. For information Steve Banta, Chief Executive Officer (CEO), will brief the Board on current issues. CONSENT AGENDA 4A. Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Arizona 4A. For action Department of Transportation (ADOT) Staff will request that the Board of Directors authorize the CEO to enter into an IGA with ADOT for Section 5311 (Rural Transit) pass-through funding for Rural Route 685 for Federal Fiscal Year 2016 (FFY16). VALLEY METRO • 101 N 1ST AVE • STE 1300 • PHOENIX AZ • 85003 • 602-262-7433 4B.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Its Deployment in Urban Areas
    URBAN ITS EXPERT GROUP GUIDELINES FOR ITS DEPLOYMENT IN URBAN AREAS SMART TICKETING January 2013 U R B A N ITS E X P E R T G ROUP Document Information Version Number: 1.0 Dissemination Level: Public Members of Urban ITS Expert Group ALBRECHT Hanfried Albrecht Consult GmbH / OCA DE BEASLEY Simon Reading Borough Council / UDG UK BLAQUIERE Alexandre* Tisseo - Toulouse Public Transport Authority FR BROWN Tony Hampshire County Council UK COLDEFY Jean Greater Lyon Region FR DIEGO BERNARDO Enrique* EMT - Madrid Public Transport Authority SP ELIASSEN Jarl Trafikanten AS NO FIBY Hans Transport Association East Austria AT FRANCO Gino Mizar / Swarco IT HASELBERGER Rainer City of Vienna AT HEDIN Johan* Hybris Konsult SE IZDEBSKI Piotr ZTM Warsaw PL JENSEN Helge City of Oslo NO KEARNS Steve Transport for London UK LEFEBVRE Olivier STIF Ile-de-France FR LEIHS Dietrich Kapsch TrafficCom AT MEEUWISSEN Marcel City of Enschede NL PLANATH Susanne Swedish Transport Administration SE SPELL Sabine Volkswagen AG DE TØFTING Svend North Denmark Region DK TOMASSINI Maurizio ISIS - Rome IT TYRINOPOULOS Yannis Hellenic Institute of Transport (HIT) GR VAN DEN ABEELE Didier Alstom Transport FR VLEMMINGS Tiffany National Data Warehouse for Traffic information NL WINNING Ian City of Cork IE * Members of the Smart Ticketing Subgroup Notices The Urban ITS Expert Group thanks following external experts for their contributions to this document: - DE CHANTERAC Gilles, Interappli - JANSSEN Sjef, VDV - PHILIPP Klaus, T.C.L. GmbH - VERITY John, ITSO Editors of document: - SZELIGOWKSA
    [Show full text]
  • F T a Report Number 27, Asset Management Guide
    Asset Management Guide Focusing on the Management of Our Transit Investments OCTOBER 2012 FTA Report No. 0027 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Dr. David Rose Lauren Isaac Keyur Shah Tagan Blake Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. COVER PHOTO Courtesy of David Sailors DISCLAIMER This document is intended as a technical assistance product. It is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products of manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Asset Management Guide Focusing on the Management of Our Transit Investments OCTOBER 2012 FTA Report No. 0027 PREPARED BY Dr. David Rose Lauren Isaac Keyur Shah Tagan Blake Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. One Penn Plaza New York, NY 11019 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 AVAILABLE ONLINE http://www.fta.dot.gov/research FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i Metric Conversion Table Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L 3 3 ft cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m 3 3 yd cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m 3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg megagrams T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 Mg (or "t") (or "metric ton") TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) o 5 (F-32)/9 o F Fahrenheit Celsius C or (F-32)/1.8 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ii FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ii REPORT1.
    [Show full text]