5.1 Case Study Repository
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
5.1 Case Study May 2013 Repository This is deliverable 5.1, due on October 31 st 2013, according to TRANSFORMATION IS POSSIBLE! the TRANSFORuM Description of Work , Annex I of Grant Agreement No. MOVE/FP7/321565/TRANSFORUM Funding scheme: Coordination and Support Action Date latest version of Annex I against which the assessment will be made: 01.02.2013 Reporting period: 1st August 2013 – 28 February 2014 (Month 7 – Month 12) Introduction This repository of case studies forms the deliverable 5.1 of the TRANSFORuM project. The production of the deliverable has been carried out in accordance with the 5 tasks outlined in the project description of work. A full explanation of the methodology, selection process and analysis of the case studies can be found in deliverable 5.2 “Transformation is Possible! Good practice in the context of the EU White Paper”. Document Details Deliverable no. 5.1 Dissemination level Public Work Package WP5 TRANSFORMATION IS POSSIBLE Author(s) Karen Anderton Co-author(s) Ernest Czermanski, Olga Debicka, Merethe Dotterud Leiren, Zdenek Hrebicek, Julie Krogstad, Aneta Oniszczuk-Jastrzabek, Bogusz Wisnicki, Jirina Vesela Status Final File Name TRANSFORuM_D5-1_Case study repository.doc Project Start Date and Duration 01 February 2013, 24 months Table of content 1 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Task 5.1 – Case selection ................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Task 5.2 – Knowledge acquisition ..................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Task 5.3 – Four Thematic Workshops on good practice – “Transformation is possible!” .......... 4 2 Urban Mobility Case Studies ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 beÁgueda, Águeda, Portugal ............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 CNG and biofuel buses, Toulouse, France ....................................................................................... 9 2.3 CycleLogistics, Multi-national .......................................................................................................... 13 2.4 E-mobility, Madrid, Spain ................................................................................................................. 16 2.5 Electromobility Model Regions, Germany ..................................................................................... 21 2.6 Electric vehicles, Oslo, Norway ........................................................................................................ 24 2.7 Fossil free Växjö and TRAILBLAZER, Växjö, Sweden ..................................................................... 28 2.8 Multi-modal transport planning, Freiburg, Germany ................................................................... 31 2.9 Sustainable Urban Transport Plan, Maribor, Slovenia ................................................................. 36 2.10 Trolleybuses, Gdynia, Poland .......................................................................................................... 39 3 Freight Case Studies .................................................................................................................................. 43 3.1 Bosch and Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH, Germany ....................................................................... 43 3.2 CarConTrain, Sweden ....................................................................................................................... 45 3.3 Duisport, Duisburg, Germany ......................................................................................................... 48 3.4 Freight transport policy, Switzerland ............................................................................................. 53 3.5 InnovaTrain AG, Switzerland ........................................................................................................... 57 3.6 KASSETTS project, Multi-national .................................................................................................... 60 3.7 MegaSwing trailer wagon, Sweden ................................................................................................. 64 3.8 Motorways of the Sea: Esbjerg – Zeebrugge, Multi-national ....................................................... 67 3.9 Oversize Baltic, Multi-national ........................................................................................................ 69 3.10 Railport Scandinavia, Gothenburg, Sweden .................................................................................. 73 4 High Speed Rail Case Studies ................................................................................................................... 75 4.1 City-Ticket, Deutsche Bahn, Germany ............................................................................................ 75 4.2 Frecciarossa, Trenitalia, Italy ........................................................................................................... 79 4.3 HS1 and Eurostar, Multi-national ................................................................................................... 82 4.4 HSR investment, Sweden ................................................................................................................. 86 4.5 Javelin, Southeastern, UK ................................................................................................................. 89 4.6 LGV Sud-Est, SNCF, France ............................................................................................................... 93 4.7 Madrid-Seville route, AVE, Spain ..................................................................................................... 95 4.8 Rail Baltica, Multi-national ............................................................................................................... 99 4.9 Rail Europe Ltd., Multi-national..................................................................................................... 104 4.10 Thalys, Multi-national ..................................................................................................................... 106 5 Integrated Ticketing, Information and Payment System (ITS) Case Studies ..................................... 111 5.1 ACTIV Card, Bucharest, Romania .................................................................................................. 111 5.2 Autolib’, Paris, France ..................................................................................................................... 114 5.3 Co-Cities – European Cooperative Mobility Services, Multi-national ........................................ 117 5.4 GA Travel Card, Switzerland .......................................................................................................... 121 5.5 ID Tickets and Free Public Transport, Tallinn, Estonia ............................................................... 123 5.6 Omnibus Card, Brescia, Italy ......................................................................................................... 127 5.7 Oyster Card, London, UK ............................................................................................................... 129 5.8 Real time traffic information, Budapest, Hungary ...................................................................... 132 5.9 Rejseplanen, Denmark ................................................................................................................... 134 5.10 Touch & Travel, Deutsche Bahn, Germany .................................................................................. 137 1 Executive Summary This repository of case studies forms deliverable 5.1 of the TRANSFORuM project. The production of the deliverable has been carried out in accordance with the 5 tasks outlined in the project description of work. A full explanation of the methodology, selection process and analysis of the case studies can be found in deliverable 5.2 “Transformation is Possible! Good practice in the context of the EU White Paper”. This summary, however, will briefly outline how each of the tasks was completed and give some overview information about the case studies contained in the repository. 1.1 Task 5.1 – Case selection In collaboration with the thematic group leaders and the consortium partners involved in WP5 a set of principles was defined for case study selection. The criteria relating to identifying good practice, as a general concept were established, before identifying criteria that were relevant for each specific thematic group. The work of Bardach (2005; 2012) 1 was used as a starting point to frame discussions about good practice in the context of TRANSFORuM. This work suggests that a practice is a tangible and visible behaviour, for our work, this definition was broadened to include not just behaviours, but other entities and measures (such as technologies, train routes and payment systems) that demonstrate contributions towards achieving the White Paper goals. Good practice was identified as a process, which could be situated in a context. Based on these discussions a case study template was prepared to be used as a guide for preparing all the studies. Where possible, it was ensured that case studies