Success with Science

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Success with Science ©2010 Gaglani et al. SUCCESS WITH SCIENCE: The Winners‘ Guide to High School Research Shiv Gaglani with Maria Elena De Obaldia Scott Duke Kominers Dayan Li Carol Y. Suh Foreword by Nobel Laureate Dudley R. Herschbach www.successwithscience.org Five Harvard students and research competition winners reveal how to succeed at high school research. 1 ©2010 Gaglani et al. Dedicated to our parents, teachers, and mentors for their invaluable encouragement, guidance, and support. 2 ©2010 Gaglani et al. CONTENTS Preface Acknowledgments Foreword Part I: The Benefits of Doing Research 1. Why do Research? 2. Personal Development 3. Scholarships 4. College Admissions 5. Career Decisions Part II: Getting Started on a Project 6. Forming an Idea 7. Finding a Lab and a Mentor 8. Working in a Lab 9. Impressing your Mentor 10. Keeping a Logbook Part III: Elements of a Successful Research Project 11. Using the Scientific Method to your Advantage 12. Writing a Publishable Paper 13. General Presentation Techniques 14. Making a Board or Poster 15. Giving a Presentation 3 ©2010 Gaglani et al. Part IV: Opportunities and Competitions 16. Intel International Science and Engineering Fair 17. Siemens Competition for Math, Science, & Technology 18. Intel Science Talent Search 19. Other Major Research Competitions 20. Summer Research Programs Part V: Research Beyond High School 21. Research after High School 22. Conferences and Papers 23. Research Community About the Authors Appendix 4 ©2010 Gaglani et al. PREFACE Welcome to The Winners‘ Guide to High School Research! First, congratulations are in order because you have already taken the first steps to succeeding with science by picking up this book. There are many ways to succeed in high school, though there are few that can parallel science research in terms of the widespread opportunities and immense benefits it provides to students who excel in it – hence the title Success with Science. The tagline is The Winners‘ Guide to High School Research because this is a guide written by, and containing the advice of, students who have performed extremely well in science research competitions such as the International Science and Engineering Fair, Siemens Competition, and Intel Science Talent Search, among many others. By reading this book and using the advice within it, you will learn how to formulate a research project idea, find people who can help you complete it, effectively present it to diverse audiences, and participate successfully in research competitions. This guide has been written to be useful to anyone interested in science research: from the freshman rookie with a vague interest in science to the senior veteran striving for first place at the Science Talent Search. With its testimonials from high school students whose lives were positively changed by their research experiences, this guide also aims to motivate and empower students who otherwise would not pursue science and research opportunities. In doing so, this book seeks to encourage more students to pursue science and technology, or at least to think creatively and take initiative. With these ambitious goals in mind, what is the best way to use this book? When I developed the idea and outline of this guide, I chose to divide it into five distinct parts that may be read sequentially or separately depending upon your interests and needs. I recruited four of my peers to be contributing authors based on their experiences and strengths, which are reflected in each part. Part I details the many individual benefits you can realize from participating in science research. For example, many high school students who do research get into top colleges, win scholarships, learn about career options, make lifelong friends, and develop qualities and skills that will help them throughout their life – the chapters in Part I describe each of these benefits in depth. After Part I whets your appetite to do research, Part II describes the nuts and bolts of getting started by forming an idea, finding a lab or mentor, working in the lab, impressing your mentor, and keeping records of your research in a logbook. Once you make some progress on your project, Part III will help you present your research – in both written reports and oral presentations – to your teachers, science competition judges, and the general public. Part IV not only describes the major research competitions in which you can enter your project and the summer research programs in which you can participate, but also provides advice from actual winners and participants on how to do your best in those venues. Finally, Part V provides a glimpse of what research is like after high school, because there are key differences in college, and knowledge of these differences will help you hit the ground running when you are an undergraduate. One important note that cannot be overemphasized is that your science research experience will prime you for success, especially if you approach it with a genuine interest in 5 ©2010 Gaglani et al. research and discovery rather than an interest in winning competitions. Though the awards and prestige that come with winning are great byproducts of excellent research, the research experience itself is far more valuable in the long-term. Best of luck with your research career! Shiv Gaglani Primary Author and Editor, Success with Science: The Winner‘s Guide to High School Research Cambridge, Massachusetts January 31, 2010 6 ©2010 Gaglani et al. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There are many people who helped make this book possible. First, we would like to thank Professor Dudley R. Herschbach for his tremendous support and encouragement. He is the co- advisor of the Harvard College Undergraduate Research Association (HCURA), which we all have been members of. We would like to thank HCURA – especially Lev Shaket, Koning Shen, Wendy Ying, and HCURA co-advisor Greg Llacer – for empowering us to reach out to countless students, teachers, and professionals regarding this project. In the same vein, we would like to thank those students, teachers, and professionals who contributed invaluable advice and quotes to this book. In terms of the publishing process, we are indebted to Malorie Snider for her help contacting publishers and proofreading the manuscript, Poonam Sharma for her early advice on publishing a book while in college, and William Kominers, Ellen Dickstein Kominers, and Saritha K. Tice for their legal advice. Last but not least, we are very thankful to Research Corporation for Science Advancement for publishing this manuscript and, in particular, Dan Huff whose energy, helpfulness, and patience throughout the process helped turn this project into a reality. Shiv Gaglani Shiv is grateful to all of his high school research teachers at West Shore High and supporters in Brevard County, especially Sherie Jenkins, Tonya Galaida, and Richard DiPatri, as well as his mentors at the University of Central Florida, University of Miami, Clemson University, and Harvard University. He is especially thankful to his RSI mentor, Dr. Glenn D. Rosen, for his guidance over the last five years, as well as to Dr. Nelson Ying for his tremendous support throughout high school and into college. He would also like to thank Professor Dudley R. Herschbach, whom he met at the International Science and Engineering Fair years before entering Harvard. Little did he know that Professor Herschbach would be his advisor, mentor, supporter, and friend throughout his college years. Finally, he is grateful to his sister, Anushka, for always believing in him, and his parents, Dr. Mukesh Gaglani and Vanita Gaglani, for the sacrifices they made so that he could begin this journey, for the continuous support that has allowed him to come this far, and for the lessons in character that give him strength and guidance each day. Maria Elena De Obaldia Ellen is grateful for the mentorship of her professors at the University of Pennsylvania and the Children's Hospital of Boston for instilling her with a deep appreciation for science. Ellen is thankful for scholarship and grant support from the United States Navy, Army, Intel Corporation, Siemens Foundation, the Harvard College Financial Aid program, and the National Institutes of Health. Ellen is deeply grateful to her parents for encouraging her to take on big challenges and seeing her through the obstacles that have come along with this. She is also grateful for her family and friends, who have supported her thus far in countless ways. 7 ©2010 Gaglani et al. Scott Duke Kominers Scott appreciates the support of his undergraduate research advisors (Susan Athey, Erik D. Demaine, Drew Fudenberg, Edward L. Glaeser, John William Hatfield, William R. Kerr, Alvin E. Roth, Kay Kaufman Shelemay, Andrei Shleifer, David Smith, E. Glen Weyl, and especially Noam D. Elkies), his Research Science Institute mentors (Christopher C. Mihelich, John Rickert, Jenny Sendova, and Aaron M. Tievsky), and his high school teachers (especially Susan Schwartz Wildstrom). While writing his Guide chapters, Scott was supported by a Harvard College PRISE Fellowship and a Harvard Mathematics Department Highbridge Fellowship, and by the Harvard IQSS Summer Research Scholars Program. Many of Scott's friends provided helpful comments and suggestions on this work: most notably, Zachary Abel, Andrea J. Hawksley, Sonia Jaffe, Gregory Llacer, and Steffano U. Saldrium. Additionally, Scott would like to thank his family for their energy and inspiration. Dayan Li Dayan is greatly indebted to Jane Hemelt, Rocco Mennella, Godfrey Rangasammy, and all of his high school science teachers for guiding him through his first forays into scientific research; he also gives special thanks to Dr. David Roberts and Dr. Jeffrey Isenberg for their mentorship at NIH; finally, he thanks Dr. Zhijun Chen, Professor Benjamin Allen, Dr. Bodo Stern, Professor Dudley Herschbach, Professor Andrew P. McMahon, and his parents, Chaoxia He and Wenbin Li, for being such generous sources of support and inspiration in his development as a scientist.
Recommended publications
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Siemens Ag
    QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF SIEMENS AG Authors (Universitat de Barcelona): Patrícia Amor Agut Clara Valls Moreno Gemma Casserras EDITOR: Jordi Marti Pidelaserra (Dpt. Comptabilitat, Universitat Barcelona) 1 Patrícia Amor 14961785 Clara Valls 14959906 Gemma Casserras 14965090 Alessandra Cortegiani (Bloc 3) 14991480 2 BLOC 1: SIEMENS AG BLOC 2: Risk Analysis BLOC 3: Profitability Analysis 3 BLOC 1 SIEMENS AG BASIC INFORMATION 4 Index 1. Introduction 2. Company History 3. Vision, Mission and Strategy 3.1. Vision 3.2. Mission 3.3. Strategy 4. Company Structure 4.1. Board of directors 4.2. Management by sector 5. Company Sectors 5.1. Energy Sector 5.2. Industry Sector 5.3. Healthcare Sector 5.4. Infrastructure and cities Sector 5.5. Financial Services 5.6. Other activities 5.7. Revenues importance 6. Shareholders 7. Stakeholders 8. Competitors 5 1. Introduction: Siemens AG is a German multinational engineering and electronics conglomerate company headquartered in Munich, Germany. It is the largest based in Europe. Founded to manufacture and install telegraphic systems, Germany-based Siemens AG has prospered and grown over 165 years to become a multifaceted electronics and electrical engineering enterprise, and one of the most international corporations in the world. Founded to manufacture and install telegraphic systems, Germany-based Siemens AG has prospered and grown over 165 years to become a multifaceted electronics and electrical engineering enterprise, and one of the most international corporations in the world. The Siemens name has been synonymous with cutting-edge technologies and continuous growth in profitability. With their wide array of products, systems and services, they are world leaders in information and communications, automation and control, power, medical solutions, transportation and lighting.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Responsibility Report 2006
    Corporate Responsibility Report 2006 Facts, figures and other information on the 2006 fiscal year www.siemens.com/corporate_responsibility Corporate Responsibility Report 2006 Content Siemens in Profile We provide facts and figures on Siemens in fiscal 2006, including key performance figures and information on our business areas, our corporate structure, Siemens worldwide, markets and competition, and our portfolio. 4 Corporate Responsibility Strategy Corporate responsibility is one of the enablers in our new company program Fit4 2010 and has a high priority in our corporate strategy. 5 Our goals We have set ourselves clear goals in a number of key areas and will report regularly on our progress on achieving them. 6 Company We report here on corporate governance, compliance, suppliers, and risk management in fiscal 2006. 8 Environment This section presents facts and figures on product stewardship and industrial environmental protection and information on our reporting methodology and management system. Climate protection is among the key topics. 10 Society Besides key citizenship programs like Siemens Generation21 and Caring Hands, this section spotlights occupational health and safety at Siemens and provides facts and figures on our global workforce. 32 Evaluation and Reporting Approach In fiscal 2006, Siemens was again listed on major indices and received numerous awards. In this chapter we also publish the details of our reporting approach. 63 2 Preface Facts, figures and other information As a global business operating in over 190 countries, Siemens is influenced by a variety of cultures, religions, values and mentalities. In many countries, the company has been an integral part of the economy and society for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2005 Key Figures
    s Annual Report 2005 Key figures in millions of euros 2005 (1) 2004 (1) New orders(2) 83,791 75,789 Sales(2) 75,445 70,237 Income from continuing operations 3,058 3,450 Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (810) (45) Net income 2,248 3,405 Net cash from operating and investing activities(2) (1,489) 3,015 therein: Net cash provided by operating activities 4,217 4,704 Net cash used in investing activities (5,706) (1,689) Supplemental contributions to pension trusts (included in net cash provided by (used in) operating activities) (1,496) (1,255) Net proceeds from the sale of Infineon shares (included in net cash provided by (used in) investing activities) – 1,794 Research and development expenses(2) 5,155 4,650 Shareholders’ equity (September 30) 27,117 26,855 Employees(2) (September 30, in thousands) 461 424 (1) Fiscal year from October 1 to September 30 (2) Continuing operations (excluding the discontinued mobile devices activities) Contents Letter to our Shareholders 6 Managing Board 12 Fit4More Performance and Portfolio 14 Operational Excellence 18 People Excellence 22 Corporate Responsibility 26 Group Presidents 30 Business Areas 32 Megatrends 48 Report of the Supervisory Board 64 Corporate Governance Report 72 Compensation Report 78 Information for shareholders* 88 Management’s discussion and analysis 90 Consolidated Financial Statements 136 Statement of the Managing Board 214 Independent auditors’ report 215 Supervisory Board 220 Managing Board 222 Siemens financial calendar 228 Corporate Structure** * With separate
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Presidential Scholars Yearbook
    2008 Presidential Scholars Program NATIONAL RECOGNITION WEEK June 21 – June 24, 2008 National Recognition Week and the 2008 Yearbook are Sponsored by: GMAC Financial Services 2008 PRESIDENTIAL SCHOLARS 1964-2008 44 Years of Presidential Scholars Th e United States Presidential Scholars Program was established in President Johnson opened the fi rst meeting of the White House 1964, by Executive Order of the President, to recognize and celebrate Commission on Presidential Scholars by stating that the Program was some of our Nation’s most distinguished graduating high school seniors. not just a reward for excellence, but a means of nourishing excellence. Each year, up to 141 American students from across the country and Th e Program was intended to stimulate achievement in a way that around the world are named as Presidential Scholars, one of the Nation’s could be “revolutionary.” highest honors for high school students. By presenting these young During the fi rst National Recognition Week in 1964, the Scholars people with the Presidential Scholars’ Medallion, the President of the participated in seminars with Secretary of State Dean Rusk, Astronaut United States symbolically honors all graduating high school seniors of Alan B. Shepard, Jr., and Chief Justice Earl Warren. President Johnson high potential. challenged the Scholars to give their talents and time “in our land For forty-three years, from President Lyndon Baines Johnson to and in all lands to cleaning away the blight, to sweeping away the President George W. Bush, the Presidential Scholars Program has placed shoddiness, to wiping away the injustices and inequities of the past so more than 5,000 outstanding young achievers in the national spotlight.
    [Show full text]
  • Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rise of 4Th Reich J
    Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rise of 4th Reich J. Marrs INTRODUCTION PART ONE - THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF THE THIRD REICH PART TWO - THE REICH CONSOLIDATES PART THREE - THE REICH ASCENDANT Epilogue INTRODUCTION ADOLF HITLER’S THIRD REICH ENDED IN BERLIN ON APRIL 30, 1945 Thunder reverberated from a storm of Russian artillery that was bombarding the ruined capital. The day before, along with the incoming shells, came particularly bad news for the fuehrer, who by this late date in World War II was confined to his underground bunker beneath the Reich chancellery. Hitler had learned that two days earlier his Axis partner, Italy’s Fascist dictator Benito Mussolini, had been captured by paramilitary Italian resistance fighters. Mussolini and his mistress, Clara Petacci, were executed and their bodies were left hanging from lampposts in a Milan piazza. This news was especially worrisome to Hitler because only hours earlier he had married Eva Braun in a small civil ceremony inside the Fuehrerbunker. Hitler had previously vowed never to be captured alive, and reiterated to his entourage that neither he nor his new bride would be made a “spectacle, presented by the Jews, to divert their hysterical masses.” He made obvious preparations for the end of his reign. He handed out poison capsules to his remaining female secretaries and had Blondi, his favorite Alsatian dog, poisoned. Two other house hold dogs were shot. Dictating a last will, he stated, “I myself and my wife—in order to escape the disgrace of deposition or capitulation—choose death.” He ordered that their bodies be burned immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • National Nonprofit Organizations That Inspire and Enable Invention and Invention-Based Enterprises Andrew Reamer1 February 28, 2014
    THE GEORGE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC POLICY National Nonprofit Organizations That Inspire and Enable Invention and Invention-based Enterprises Andrew Reamer1 February 28, 2014 Introduction Economics literature makes quite clear that national economic growth is very much a function of inventive and innovative activities and that these activities, in turn, depend on a variety of institutional factors such as the distribution of workforce skills and creativity, rates of entrepreneurship, openness to cooperation, incentives for taking risks, the level and nature of public research and development (R&D) investment, and opportunities for serendipity.2 One dimension of a nation’s institutional infrastructure is its array of nonprofit organizations with a mission to inspire and enable invention and invention-based enterprises. This paper provides an inventory of such organizations in the United States, with several uses in mind. First, it aims to be a reference document for use by policymakers, funders, program managers, and academic researchers. Second, it offers initial assessments of the state of the field and identifies opportunities for enhancing it. Criteria for an organization’s inclusion in the paper are that it be: nonprofit, nationwide in scope, and offer programs that inspire and enable inventors and invention-based enterprises.3 The paper provides information on 59 organizations, distributed across six categories.4 First, findings for each category are summarized, then a detailed profile is provided for each organization, by category, in the appendix. The paper’s organization by category follows. 1 The author is research professor at the George Washington Institute of Public Policy. This paper is the public version of one delivered under contract to the Lemelson Foundation of Portland, Oregon for its internal use.
    [Show full text]
  • MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2007 By
    MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2007 By: Senator(s) Brown To: Rules SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 593 1 A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION COMMENDING AND CONGRATULATING MADHAVI 2 GAVINI OF COLUMBUS, MISSISSIPPI, A STUDENT AT THE MISSISSIPPI 3 SCHOOL FOR MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE, FOR RECEIVING THE TOP 4 SCHOLARSHIP AWARD IN THE PRESTIGIOUS SIEMENS COMPETITION IN MATH, 5 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. 6 WHEREAS, the Siemens Competition in Math, Science and 7 Technology is the nation's premier science research program for 8 high school students. This prestigious program provides more than 9 $1 Million in scholarships and awards to our nation's brightest 10 and best young scholars; and 11 WHEREAS, this year, the individual $50,000.00 scholarship 12 winner was Madhavi Gavini of Columbus, Mississippi, a student at 13 the Mississippi School for Math and Science; and 14 WHEREAS, the Siemens Competition was launched in 1998 to 15 recognize America's best and brightest math and science students. 16 In 2006-2007, 1,660 students entered the competition. Entries are 17 judged at the regional level by esteemed scientists at six leading 18 research universities which host the regional competitions: 19 Carnegie Mellon University (Middle States), University of Notre 20 Dame (Midwest), Stanford University (West), Massachusetts 21 Institute of Technology (New England), Georgia Institute of 22 Technology (South) and The University of Texas at Austin 23 (Southwest); and 24 WHEREAS, the Siemens Foundation, established in 1998, is a 25 national leader in math and science education, providing nearly $2 26 Million in scholarships and awards annually. Based in Iselin, New 27 Jersey, the Foundation's signature programs -- the Siemens 28 Competition in Math, Science and Technology, the Siemens Awards S.
    [Show full text]
  • NELSON TANSU, Ph.D
    N. Tansu, Lehigh University (RCEAS, ECE & INCL + CPN) NELSON TANSU, Ph.D. Daniel E. '39 and Patricia M. Smith Endowed Chair Professor in Photonics and Nanoelectronics Director, Lehigh Integrated Photonics and Nanofabrication Core Laboratory [INCL, university-wide] Director, Center for Photonics and Nanoelectronics (CPN) Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA, Email - [email protected] Information updated up to: September 2019 Office Contact Information Nelson Tansu, Ph.D. [Fellow of National Academy of Inventors, NAI Fellow – elected in 2016] [ISI Highly Cited Researcher, Clarivate Analytics, since 2018] Daniel E. '39 and Patricia M. Smith Endowed Chair Professor in Photonics and Nanoelectronics Director, Integrated Photonics and Nanofabrication Core Laboratory (INCL, university-wide) Director, Center for Photonics and Nanoelectronics (CPN) Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) P. C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Science (RCEAS) Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA Email: [email protected], Cell Phone: (484) 547-4818, Fax: (610) 758-2605 Research Group: www.ece.lehigh.edu/~tansu , CPN Web: www.lehigh.edu/cpn ECE Page: http://www.ece.lehigh.edu/index.php?page=tansu Academic Lineage Tree: https://academictree.org/etree/tree.php?pid=431754 Birth Place and Date Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia, & October 20th, 1977 (Age: 41); US Permanent Resident Marital Status: Married with Adela Gozali Yose (since 2007) [with 1 son] Educational Background Fall 1998 – May 2003 University of Wisconsin-Madison Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Electrical Engineering (specialization area: Applied Physics) with distributed minors in Physics and Material Science Engineering • WARF Graduate University Fellowship & VILAS Graduate University Fellowship • Ph.D. Advisor: Prof. Luke J.
    [Show full text]
  • 101 U.S. Regional Finalists Announced for 2017 Siemens Competition in Math, Science and Technology All Vying for Chance to Win $100,000 Scholarship
    NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contacts: Elizabeth Cho Charmion Kinder Siemens Discovery Education 917-622-2413 240-274-2173 [email protected] [email protected] 101 U.S. Regional Finalists Announced for 2017 Siemens Competition in Math, Science and Technology All Vying for Chance to Win $100,000 Scholarship For First Time in Competition’s History, National Finalists Guaranteed Scholarships of at Least $25,000 in Final Round of Competition WASHINGTON, Oct 18, 2017 – The Siemens Foundation today announced the 2017 class of regional finalists for the Siemens Competition in Math, Science & Technology, the nation’s premier research competition for high school students. These regional finalists were picked from an exceptional group of 491 semifinalists announced yesterday who were chosen from the pool of more than 1860 projects submitted this year. The 101 regional finalists will now advance to the next round of the competition – the Regional Finals. All regional finalists receive at least $1,000 in scholarship money while the 1st place individuals and teams from these regional competitions win $3,000 and $6,000, respectively. The Regional finalists will compete in one of six regional competitions virtually hosted over three consecutive weekends in November at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (November 3-4); University of Notre Dame (November 3-4); The University of Texas at Austin (November 10-11); California Institute of Technology (November 10-11); and Georgia Institute of Technology (November 17-18); and Carnegie Mellon University (November 17-18). Winners of the regional events will advance to the National Finals to be held at The George Washington University in Washington, D.C., December 4-5, 2017, where $500,000 in scholarships will be awarded, including the two top prizes of $100,000 and one of the most prestigious science honors awarded to high school students in the country today.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2006
    Annual Report 2006 www.siemens.com Key figures in millions of euros 2006(1) 2005(1) New orders(2) 96,259 83,791 Sales(2) 87,325 75,445 Income from continuing operations 3,087 3,058 Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (54) (810) Net income 3,033 2,248 Net cash from operating and investing activities(2) 739 (1,489) therein: Net cash provided by operating activities 5,174 4,217 Net cash used in investing activities (4,435) (5,706) Shareholders’ equity (September 30) 29,306 27,022 Employees(2) (September 30, in thousands) 475 461 (1) Fiscal year from October 1 to September 30 (2) Continuing operations (excluding the discontinued mobile devices activities) Contents Letter to our Shareholders 7 Managing Board 14 Fit4More 16 Performance and Portfolio 18 Operational Excellence 22 People Excellence 24 Corporate Responsibility 28 Research and Development 32 Worldwide Presence 34 Regional Highlights 36 Group Presidents 46 Business Areas 48 Shanghai and Siemens 64 Report of the Supervisory Board 73 Corporate Governance Report 80 Compensation Report 86 Information for shareholders* 96 Management’s discussion and analysis 98 Consolidated Financial Statements 148 Statement of the Managing Board 236 Independent Auditors’ Report 237 Siemens financial calendar 253 Corporate Structure** * With separate table of contents ** See foldout inside back cover. Innovations of the year www.siemens.com/megatrends www.siemens.com/innovation Healthcare I SOMATOM Definition Faster than a heartbeat Siemens has developed a new computed tomography tem uses two X-ray tubes and two detectors at the same (CT) scanner that produces images at unprecedented time, allowing physicians to better differentiate blood speed while cutting cardiac patients’ radiation exposure vessels, bone and soft tissue.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Technology for K-12 Educators
    Fall 2007 OF TECHNOLOGY for K-12 Educators Prize-winning Awards and Competitions Rich Resources for 21st Century Skills Targeted Tech Training and Professional Development Free and Inexpensive Finds Worthy Web Explorations Attainable Grants Respond and win an HP PhotoSmart R927 digital camera. See back cover for details. Compliments of The right technology for your classroom. $89900 CDWG 1159998 Epson® PowerLite® 83c 2200 ANSI lumens XGA projector • Powerful 7W audio • Closed captioning capabilities for the hearing-impaired — no external decoder box required • RJ-45 Ethernet 10/100 Mb LAN incorporated for monitor and control • Two-year limited parts and labor, 90-day lamp warranty, with Epson® Road Service Program that includes overnight exchange $109999 CDWG 1205954 Epson PowerLite 822p 2600 ANSI lumens XGA projector • Amazing audio that’s sure to fill any room with built-in 7W speaker • More intense, sharper images, with the latest generation of high aperature, Epson 3LCD technology • RJ-45 connectivity and included software to monitor the projector over a network • Two-year limited parts and labor, 90-day lamp warranty, with Epson Road Service Program that includes overnight exchange ©2007 CDW Government, Inc. CDWG.com/bigdeal • 800.808.4239 01 BD32183.indd 1 6/28/07 10:02:26 AM Get a head start with the right technology. $55161 CDWG 1193346 Promethean Activslate XR 8" x 6" digitizer • Wireless, fully integrated, mini-board • Enhancing interactivity in the classroom • Allows you to take control of the Activboard from anywhere in the
    [Show full text]
  • Nagiza F. Samatova, Ph.D
    Nagiza F. Samatova, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Computer Science North Carolina State University Senior Research Scientist Computer Science and Mathematics Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Voice: (919) 513-7575, Fax: (919) 515-7925 E-mail: [email protected] Date: August 15, 2008 Contents I. Introduction 1 I.A Brief Resume . 1 I.B Self-Assessment . 4 II. Teaching and Mentoring of Undergraduate and Graduate Students 8 II.A Teaching Effectiveness . 8 II.B Instructional Development . 10 II.D Master's and Doctoral Theses Directed and Being Directed . 12 II.E Academic Advising . 14 II.F Mentoring Activities . 16 III. Scholarship in the Realms of Faculty Responsibility 18 III.A Scholarly Accomplishments . 18 III.B Research Project Record . 40 III.C Participation in Centers, Consortia and Other Organized Scholarly Efforts . 43 IV. Extension and Engagement with Constituencies Outside the University 45 V. Technological and Managerial Innovation 48 VI. Service to the University and Professional Societies 49 1 I. Introduction A. Brief Resume 1. Education Computational Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, PhD, Applied Mathematics, 1993 University of Tennessee, Knoxville, MS, Computer Science, 1998 Tashkent State University, Uzbekistan, BS, Applied Mathematics, 1991 Smith College, New England, Certificate of Molecular Biologist, 1995 2. Professional Experience North Carolina State University, Department of Computer Science, 2007-present Associate Professor, 2007-present Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Computer Science
    [Show full text]