DOCSLIB.ORG

Mr. Jens MODVIG Chairperson Mr. Patrice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mr. Jens MODVIG Chairperson Mr. Patrice 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY 10118-3299 Tel: +1-212-290-4700 Mr. Jens MODVIG Fax: +1-212-736-1300; 917-591-3452 Chairperson Europe and Central Asia Mr. Patrice GILLIBERT Division Hugh Williamson, Director Head of the Secretariat Rachel Denber, Deputy Director Judith Sunderland, Deputy Director (Acting) Philippe Dam, Advocacy Director UN Committee Against Torture Tanya Lokshina, Associate Director Inna Khodzhaeva, Moscow Office Director OHCHR – Palais Wilson Giorgi Gogia, Associate Director Emma Sinclair-Webb, Senior Researcher 52 rue des Pâquis Damelya Aitkhozhina, Researcher Lydia Gall, Senior Researcher CH‐1201 Geneva, Switzerland Yulia Gorbunova, Senior Researcher Mihra Rittmann, Senior Researcher Eva Cosse, Researcher Brussels, 18 November 2020 Kartik Raj, Researcher Vladislav Lobanov, Senior Research Assistant Anahit Chilingaryan, Research Assistant Oksana Antipova-Kheinonen, Associate RE: Follow‐up to the review of the situation in Belarus Viktoriya Kim, Assistant Researcher Catherine Pilishvili, Senior Associate Marlene Auer, Associate Aichurek Kurmanbekova, Associate Dear Chairperson, Marlene Auer, Associate Laura Mills, Researcher Anastasiia Zlobina, Coordinator Since the last review of Belarus by the Committee Against Torture, the authorities in Belarus Fatima Burhan Mohamed, Research Assistant have engaged in a new, widespread pattern of abuse. This took place in the aftermath of A DVISORY Committee the August 9, 2020 presidential election. We would like to submit, as follow‐up to the Catherine Zennström, Chair Jean Paul Marthoz, Vice-chair concluding observations of the Committee against Torture (CAT/C/BLR/CO/5) adopted at Isabelle de Wismes Tana de Zulueta the 63rd session, two publications that provide an updated overview of situation in Belarus. Jonathan Fanton Colette Shulman We hope these reports are helpful in assessing the government’s implementation of the William von Mueffling recommendations contained in Paragraphs 8, 16 and 47 of the Concluding Observations. Alexander Cooley Stephen del Rosso Felice Gaer Miklós Haraszti The first of these publications is Human Rights Watch’s September 15, 2020, report, Alice H. Henkin Jeri Laber “Belarus: Systematic Beatings, Torture of Protestors – OSCE, UN Human Rights Council Masha Lipman Helena Luczywo Inquiries Needed.” The report is based on Human Rights Watch’s first‐hand interviews in Jane Olson Arjan Overwater Belarus and documents systematic beating, torture and other ill‐treatment of protesters by Kimberly Marteau Emerson the Belarussian authorities, in the days following the August 9, 2020 presidential election. Glenda Nühn-Morris Lucy Pereira Leon Sigal Malcolm Smith The second is the report of the OSCE rapporteur appointed by 17 OSCE participating States Joanna Weschler under the Moscow Mechanism. This report’s section entitled “Prohibition of Torture and Human Rights Watch Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment” provides authoritative Kenneth Roth, Executive Director information and recommendations of interest to this Committee. Michele Alexander, Deputy Executive Director, Development and Global Initiatives Emma Daly, Deputy Executive Director, Media (Acting) Barbara Pirto, Deputy Executive Director, Operations The Committee’s follow‐up procedure can be a crucial opportunity to highlight broader (Acting) Joseph Saunders, Deputy Executive Director, Program concerns over the ongoing crackdown against political opposition and civil society in (Acting) Bruno Stagno Ugarte, Deputy Executive Director, Belarus. We hope that you will find it an important contribution. Advocacy Colin Mincy, Chief People Officer We remain available for any additional question in this regard. Dinah PoKempner, General Counsel James Ross, Legal & Policy Director Sincerely, Amy Rao, Co-Chair Neil Rimer, Co-Chair Philippe Dam Advocacy Director Europe and Central Asia Division Human Rights Watch AMSTERDAM · BEIRUT · BERLIN · BRUSSELS · CHICAGO · GENEVA - GOMA · JOHANNESBURG · KIEV · KINSHASA · LONDON · LOS ANGELES · MOSCOW · NAIROBI NEW YORK · PARIS · SAN FRANCISCO · SÃO PAULO · SEOUL · SILICON VALLEY · STOCKHOLM · SYDNEY · TOKYO · TORONTO · WASHINGTON · ZÜRICH www.hrw.org/news/2020/09/15/belarus-systematic-beatings-torture-protesters For Immediate Release ***To download video: https://media.hrw.org/preview/2563/belarus-systematic-beatings-torture-of-protesters/eng Belarus: Systematic Beatings, Torture of Protesters OSCE, UN Human Rights Council Inquiries Needed (Berlin, September 15, 2020) – Belarusian security forces arbitrarily detained thousands of people and systematically subjected hundreds to torture and other ill- treatment in the days following the August 9, 2020 presidential election, Human Rights Watch said today. The victims described beatings, prolonged stress positions, electric shocks, and in at least one case, rape, and said they saw other detainees suffer the same or worse abuse. They had serious injuries, including broken bones, cracked teeth, skin wounds, electrical burns, and mild traumatic brain injuries. Some had kidney damage. Six of the people interviewed were hospitalized, for one to five days. Police held detainees in custody for several days, often incommunicado, in overcrowded and unhygienic conditions. “The sweeping brutality of the crackdown shows the lengths to which the Belarusian authorities will go to silence people, but tens of thousands of peaceful protesters continue to demand fair elections and justice for abuses,” said Hugh Williamson, Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The United Nations and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) should urgently set in motion inquiries to ensure that evidence is collected that could contribute to accountability for grave human rights violations.” The UN Human Rights Council, which will hold an urgent debate on Belarus during the session that will run from September 14 to October 6, and the OSCE should promptly open inquiries. Human Rights Watch interviewed 27 former detainees, 21 men and 6 women, nearly all of whom said they were arrested between August 8 and 12. Some were arrested as they took part in demonstrations that they described as peaceful; others were grabbed off the streets or from their cars. Many shared medical documents and photographs of injuries. At least five still had bruises and/or wore casts at the time of the interview. Human Rights Watch also spoke with 14 people with knowledge of the arrests and abuse, most between August 20 and 29, in Minsk, Hrodna, and Homiel, including witnesses to arrests, healthcare workers, and detainees’ relatives. Human Rights Watch also examined 67 video recordings and written accounts by former detainees and their relatives, either from public sources or shared directly with researchers. On the basis of Human Rights Watch’s findings, much of the physical abuse by riot police and other law enforcement agents constitutes torture, as do the detention conditions that interviewees described. From August 9 to 13, police arrested nearly 7,000 people amid an unprecedented wave of popular and largely peaceful protests. They alleged widespread election irregularities that led to the contested re-election of the incumbent, Aleksander Lukashenka, who has been in power since 1994. With protests in their sixth week, Belarusian authorities have expelled, harassed, or stripped of accreditation dozens of foreign journalists and local journalists working for foreign and local independent outlets. Starting the first week of September, they have begun to again arrest protesters in large numbers, with the Interior Ministry reporting more than 600 detained on September 6 alone, and more than 300 in custody. Detainees said that police, riot police (known as OMON, or Special Task Police Force), and special designation forces (Spetznaz) picked them up off the streets, in some cases using extreme violence, then beat them in dangerously confined spaces in vehicles where they had trouble breathing. The security forces transported the detainees to police precincts and other detention facilities where they kicked, punched, and beat them with truncheons, forced them to stand, kneel, or lie in stress positions for hours, then held them for days in overcrowded cells. Police often denied detainees food and water and denied their requests to go to the toilet. All said they saw dozens of others subjected to similar or worse treatment. In Hrodna, a 29-year-old journalist said that when he was arrested, despite displaying his press credentials, an OMON officer broke both his wrists. A medic described witnessing an incident in Minsk on August 11, in which an OMON officer trying to arrest a motorist who had stopped his car shot a rubber bullet point-blank at him. The medic said she treated the victim on the side of the road, but he ended up needing surgery to extract the bullet from his lungs. The aim of the abuse, former detainees said, appeared to be to punish and humiliate. Most reported that OMON and other security forces singled out detainees with so-called “atypical” looks, such as men with long or dyed hair, and people with dreadlocks, piercings, or tattoos, for worse treatment and more insults. Detainees said that police and guards confiscated detainees’ medications, frequently ignored calls for medical care, and in some cases denied it altogether. In one case, a detainee with a pre- existing medical condition was ill-treated and denied timely medical attention. He fell into a coma in custody and was clinically
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Das Ukraine-Déjà-Vu
    Samstag, 05. Juni 2021, 14:00 Uhr ~14 Minuten Lesezeit Das Ukraine-Déjà-vu Der Minsker Zwischenfall wirft ein Licht auf die Bemühungen des Westens um einen Umsturz in Weißrussland. von Rubikons Weltredaktion Foto: Skorzewiak/Shutterstock.com Bisher konnten wir nur Putin zitieren, der von einem aufgeflogenen, geplanten Putsch in Weißrussland, nebst Mordplänen an Lukaschenko, berichtete (2). Jetzt aber legt der amerikanische Journalist Ben Norton Beweise vor, dass der Westen einen Regimewechsel in Minsk seit Langem plant und mit lokalen Helfern ins Werk zu setzen trachtet. Darunter ist auch jener Roman Protasewitsch, der in Minsk verhaftet wurde und darüber zum Liebling des Westens avancierte. Hier ist eine deutliche Warnung auszusprechen. Wir haben es nicht mit Anfängern zu tun. Die Gefahr eines Putsches gegen Lukaschenko ist real, die Ähnlichkeiten mit dem Ukraineputsch von 2014 sind nicht zu übersehen (3). Angesichts dieser Bedrohungslage kann die Frage ernsthaft gestellt werden, ob Lukaschenko den Regimewechselspezialisten verhaften durfte — um sich und sein Land zu schützen und diesem Land ein Schicksal zu ersparen, wie es die Ukraine, Syrien, Libyen, Venezuela oder Russland unter Boris Jelzin erdulden mussten. von Ben Norton Ein profilierter weißrussischer Regimewechsel-Aktivist, dessen Verhaftung aus einem zur Landung gezwungenen Flugzeug heraus einen internationalen Skandal auslöste, hat starke Verbindungen zu neofaschistischen Gruppen, die seine politischen Sponsoren in den Hauptstädten des Westens geflissentlich übersahen. Der rechtsradikale Aktivist Roman Protasewitsch war am 23. Mai 2021 in einer irischen Verkehrsmaschine der Ryanair unterwegs, als diese den weißrussischen Luftraum erreichte und von den Luftfahrtbehörden des Landes zum Landen aufgefordert wurde. Nach der Landung wurde Protasewitsch aus dem Flugzeug geholt und verhaftet.
    [Show full text]
  • From Assistance to Engagement—A Model for a New Era in U.S
    From Assistance to Engagement A Model for a New Era in U.S.-Russian Civil Society Relations CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & CSIS INTERNATIONAL STUDIES A Report of the CSIS Human Rights & Security Initiative 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 author Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Sarah E. Mendelson E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org September 2009 CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & CSIS INTERNATIONAL STUDIES From Assistance to Engagement A Model for a New Era in U.S.-Russian Civil Society Relations A Report of the CSIS Human Rights & Security Initiative author Sarah E. Mendelson September 2009 About CSIS In an era of ever-changing global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and practical policy solutions to decisionmakers. CSIS conducts research and analysis and develops policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke at the height of the Cold War, CSIS was dedicated to the simple but urgent goal of finding ways for America to survive as a nation and prosper as a people. Since 1962, CSIS has grown to become one of the world’s preeminent public policy institutions. Today, CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, DC. More than 220 full-time staff and a large network of affiliated scholars focus their expertise on defense and security; on the world’s regions and the unique challenges inherent to them; and on the issues that know no boundary in an increasingly connected world. Former U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 21 TRONDHEIM STUDIES on EAST EUROPEAN CULTURES
    No. 21 TRONDHEIM STUDIES ON EAST EUROPEAN CULTURES & SOCIETIES David R. Marples THE LUKASHENKA PHENOMENON Elections, Propaganda, and the Foundations of Political Authority in Belarus August 2007 David R. Marples is University Professor at the Department of History & Classics, and Director of the Stasiuk Program for the Study of Contemporary Ukraine of the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. His recent books include Heroes and Villains. Constructing National History in Contemporary Ukraine (2007), Prospects for Democracy in Belarus, co-edited with Joerg Forbrig and Pavol Demes (2006), The Collapse of the Soviet Union, 1985-1991(2004), and Motherland: Russia in the 20th Century (2002). © 2007 David R Marples and the Program on East European Cultures and Societies, a program of the Faculties of Arts and Social Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology. ISSN 1501-6684 ISBN 978-82-995792-1-6 Trondheim Studies on East European Cultures and Societies Editors: György Péteri and Sabrina P. Ramet Editorial Board: Trond Berge, Tanja Ellingsen, Knut Andreas Grimstad, Arne Halvorsen We encourage submissions to the Trondheim Studies on East European Cultures and Societies. Inclusion in the series will be based on anonymous review. Manuscripts are expected to be in English (exception is made for Norwegian Master’s and PhD theses) and not to exceed 150 double spaced pages in length. Postal address for submissions: Editor, Trondheim Studies on East European Cultures and Societies, Department of History, NTNU, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway. For more information on PEECS and TSEECS, visit our web-site at http://www.hf.ntnu.no/peecs/home/ The photo on the cover is a copy of an item included in the photo chronicle of the demonstration of 21 July 2004 and made accessible by the Charter ’97 at http://www.charter97.org/index.phtml?sid=4&did=july21&lang=3 TRONDHEIM STUDIES ON EAST EUROPEAN CULTURES & SOCIETIES No.
    [Show full text]
  • CDDRL Number 114 WORKING PAPERS June 2009
    CDDRL Number 114 WORKING PAPERS June 2009 Youth Movements in Post- Communist Societies: A Model of Nonviolent Resistance Olena Nikolayenko Stanford University Center on Democracy, Development, and The Rule of Law Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies Additional working papers appear on CDDRL’s website: http://cddrl.stanford.edu. Center on Democracy, Development, and The Rule of Law Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies Stanford University Encina Hall Stanford, CA 94305 Phone: 650-724-7197 Fax: 650-724-2996 http://cddrl.stanford.edu/ About the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) CDDRL was founded by a generous grant from the Bill and Flora Hewlett Foundation in October in 2002 as part of the Stanford Institute for International Studies at Stanford University. The Center supports analytic studies, policy relevant research, training and outreach activities to assist developing countries in the design and implementation of policies to foster growth, democracy, and the rule of law. About the Author Olena Nikolayenko (Ph.D. Toronto) is a Visiting Postdoctoral Scholar and a recipient of the 2007-2009 post-doctoral fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Her research interests include comparative democratization, public opinion, social movements, youth, and corruption. In her dissertation, she analyzed political support among the first post-Soviet generation grown up without any direct experience with communism in Russia and Ukraine. Her current research examines why some youth movements are more successful than others in applying methods of nonviolent resistance to mobilize the population in non-democracies. She has recently conducted fieldwork in Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Serbia, and Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Worlds of Labour Turned Upside Down: Revolutions And
    Introduction: Worlds of Labour Turned Upside Down Revolutions and Labour Relations in Global Historical Perspective Pepijn Brandon, Peyman Jafari and Stefan Müller Revolutions are relatively new, rare and extraordinary events in history, which is perhaps one reason why historians and social scientists alike continue to be surprised and fascinated by them. Although this interest goes back to at least the early modern revolutions in England (1640–1660) and the Netherlands (1568– 1648),1 it was what Eric Hobsbawm calls the “age of revolutions” that inspired the study of the subject in the nineteenth century. The revolutions of this period included the American (1765– 1783), the French (1789– 1799), the Haitian (1791– 1804) and the Irish (1798) revolutions, in addition to the Latin American wars of independence and the revolutions that swept Europe in 1848.2 The next upsurge of studies emerged in the second half of the twentieth century, examining the paths of the Russian (1917), German (1918– 1919), Chi- nese (1911 and 1949), Cuban (1953–1959), Hungarian (1956), Portuguese (1974) and Iranian (1979) revolutions. To this list, one should add the anti- colonial revolutions, such as in Algeria (1954– 1962), and the revolutions that toppled the Stalinist regimes in 1989. During the 1990s, the study of revolutions became confined to specialists, but a number of events in the twenty-first century have put it back under the spotlight. The revolution that toppled Suharto’s three- decade rule in Indonesia in 1998 came as a reminder that the end of the twentieth century might not have heralded the end of revolutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Realist Study of Russia's Colour
    In Fear of Colour Revolutions: A Neo- classical Realist Study of Russia’s Colour- less Foreign Policy in the Post-Soviet Space By: Jens Severinsen Cand.ling.merc. – English and European Studies (CBS) Supervisor: Kristian L. Nielsen Date of submission: 12 September 2016 Danish Title: I frygt for farvede revolutioner: Et neoklassisk realistisk studie af Ruslands farveløse udenrigspolitik i det postsovjetiske rum. Characters: 181.879 = 80 pages (including abstract, table of contents and sections 1 to 9). Abstract Siden opløsningen af Sovjetunion i 1991 har de demokratiske vinde blæst over det postsovje- tiske rum, hvilket har truet Ruslands status som regional og global magtfaktor – og fundamen- talt ændret dets indenrigs- og udenrigspolitiske dagsorden. Den største trussel for Rusland i denne henseende er de postsovjetiske ”farvede revolutioner”, der har indtruffet i bl.a. Kirgisi- stan, Georgien og Ukraine. Som en konsekvens heraf har Rusland forsøgt at modarbejde disse kræfter gennem forskelligartede strategier. Denne opgave tilsigter at analysere, hvordan Rusland reagerer på truslen fra de farvede revolutioner, hvorledes dette har ændret sig over tid med udgangspunkt i perioderne 2000-2008 og 2008-nu – og hvilke variable der spiller ind. Denne analyse vil tage udgangspunkt i neoklassisk realisme, der er en teori om internationale relationer med særlig fokus på skabelsen af staters udenrigspolitik. Neoklassisk realisme mener, at staters handlinger i det international system kan forklares ved systemiske variabler – såsom fordeling af magtkapaciteter mellem stater og andre staters intentioner eller trusler – og indenlandske variabler – såsom statens relative magt, evnen til at udvinde og bruge denne magt, grand strategies, nationalisme og ideologi. Netop disse variabler er blevet anvendt som opgavens teoretiske fundament til at belyse Ruslands udenrigspolitiske respons over for farvede revolutioner i det postsovjetiske rum.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarusian Opposition Presidential Candidate Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Today my country, Belarus, is in turmoil. Peaceful protesters are being illegally detained, beaten, and imprisoned. The protests themselves started after a cynical and blatant attempt by Mr. Lukashenko to steal the votes of the people. The demands of the nation are simple: immediate termination of violence and threats by the regime, immediate release of all political prisoners, and free and fair election. There is only one obstacle to these demands being met. This obstacle is Mr. Lukashenko, a man desperately clinging onto power and refusing to listen to his people and his own state officials. A nation can not and should not be a hostage to one man's thirst for power. And it won't. Belarusians have woken up. The point of no return has passed. This is manifested by now daily demonstrations of hundreds of thousands all across Belarus, despite police brutality and blatant disregard for Belarusian laws and international norms. This is manifested by the strikes across the largest factories and state-owned companies in Belarus, despite intimidation and in some cases unlawful layoffs. This is manifested by all the strata of our society and all the political spectrum demanding the one and the same thing. The regime of Alexander Lukashenko is morally bankrupt, legally questionable and simply untenable in the eyes of our nation. The United Nations was created as a formal body of the whole international community in order to promote and encourage respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all. In 1945 Belarus was one of the founding members of the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • As Over 600 Protesters Nabbed by Police
    08 Tuesday, September 8, 2020 Europe / Americas Georgia hosts major drills with NATO forces UK police arrest man over Birmingham Harry refunds house refurb bill from VAZIANI: Georgia on Monday launched large-scale joint military mass stabbings Netflix deal exercises with NATO forces as part of its longstanding bid to join the LONDON: A 27-year-old man has been arrested in connection LONDON: Prince Harry has paid back £2.4 million ($3.2 News alliance, which has angered Tbilisi’s Soviet-era master Russia. Some with the mass stabbings in Britain’s second city Birmingham million) of British taxpayers’ money used to renovate his 2,800 troops from the United States, France, Britain, and Poland will that left one person dead and two critically wounded, police home at Windsor Castle, using cash from his recent Netflix in brief take part in the Noble Partner 2020 exercises held at the Vaziani and said on Monday. The man was held on suspicion of murder and deal, his spokesman said on Monday. The Duke of Sussex, Camp Norio training centres near Tbilisi. Georgia’s Prime Minister seven attempted murders that were carried out after midnight as he is formally known, and his wife, American former ac- Giorgi Gakharia said the drills are “the most important component of Saturday, West Midlands Police said. The suspect was detained tress Meghan Markle, retired from royal duties earlier this efforts to make Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic integration achievable”. (AFP) in the Selly Oak area at around 4.00am (0300 GMT). (AFP) year in a quest for “financial independence”.(AFP) Spain surpasses 500,000 virus cases: Health ministry AFP This gives Spain a per-cap- During the past two weeks deaths a day were reported, as to send their children to class.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Snowden Olayı'nın ABD-Rusya İlişkileri Üzerindeki Etkisi
    Journal of International Management and Social Researches Uluslararası Yönetim ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi ISSN:2148-1415 Edward Snowden Olayı’nın ABD-Rusya İlişkileri Üzerindeki Etkileri Fatih SEZGİN Turgut Özal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü [email protected] Özet Dünya basını, 20 Mayıs 2013 tarihinden itibaren elindeki dört adet dizüstü bilgisayarla Hong Kong’a gelen Edward Snowden adlı otuz yaşındaki Amerikalı genci konuşmaya başlamıştır. Snowden’ı bir anda dünya gündemine taşıyan olay; Snowden’ın Amerikan Ulusal Güvenlik Dairesi’nde (U.S. National Security Agency-NSA) çalıştıktan sonra elindeki belgeleri The Guardian Gazetesi yetkililerine vermesi ve bu belgelerin yayınlanmasıdır. Bu ilk yayınlanan belgeler ABD’de şok etkisi yapmış ve ABD Çin’den (Hong Kong Çin yönetiminde olduğu için) Snowden’ın iadesini talep etmiştir. Çin ABD’nin sunduğu gerekçeleri makul bulmadığını beyan ederek Snowden’ı iade etmemiştir. Snowden da hemen Hong Kong’u terk ederek Rusya Federasyonu’na gitmiştir. Uzun bir süre Rusya’da Sheremetyevo Uluslararası Havalimanı’nın transit yolcu bölümünde kalan Snowden daha sonra Rusya’dan bir yıllık sığınma talebinde bulunmuş ve bu talebi de incelenerek kendisine sığınma verilmiştir. ABD ile önce Çin’i daha sonra da Rusya’yı karşı karşıya getiren bu olayda ABD her iki ülkeden de istediğini alamamanın hayal kırıklığını yaşamıştır. Gelinen nokta itibariyle ABD bu olayda kaybeden ülke olarak kayıtlara geçmiştir. Bu çalışmada Snowden olayının genelde ABD dış politikası üzerindeki etkisi özelde de Çin ve Rusya ile olan ilişkileri üzerindeki etkisi ele alınacaktır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Snowden Olayı, ABD, Çin, Rusya, NSA, Güvenlik. The Effects of Snowden Case on Us-Russia Relations Abstract World media has started to speak about American Edward Snowden aged 30 who came to Hong Kong with his 4 laptops on 20th of May 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • BELARUS Restrictions on the Political and Civil Rights of Citizens Following the 2010 Presidential Election
    BELARUS Restrictions on the Political and Civil Rights of Citizens Following the 2010 Presidential Election of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 5: No one shall be subjected to in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Article 6: Everyone has the right to recognition spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, everywhere as a person before the law. Article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimi- without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, nation to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. Article 8: Everyone has the right to an effective rem- basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person edy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. by law. Article 9: No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security June 2011 564a Uladz Hrydzin © This report has been produced with the support of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA).
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Political, Economic, and Security Issues and U.S. Interests
    Russian Political, Economic, and Security Issues and U.S. Interests Jim Nichol, Coordinator Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs March 5, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33407 Russian Political, Economic, and Security Issues and U.S. Interests Summary Russia made uneven progress in democratization during the 1990s, but this limited progress was reversed after Vladimir Putin rose to power in 1999-2000, according to many observers. During this period, the State Duma (lower legislative chamber) became dominated by government- approved parties, gubernatorial elections were abolished, and the government consolidated ownership or control over major media and industries, including the energy sector. The Putin government showed low regard for the rule of law and human rights in suppressing insurgency in the North Caucasus, according to critics. Dmitry Medvedev, Putin’s longtime protégé, was elected president in 2008; President Medvedev immediately designated Putin as prime minister and continued Putin’s policies. In August 2008, the Medvedev-Putin “tandem” directed military operations against Georgia and recognized the independence of Georgia’s separatist South Ossetia and Abkhazia, actions condemned by most of the international community. In late 2011, Putin announced that he would return to the presidency and Medvedev would become prime minister. This announcement, and flawed Duma elections at the end of the year, spurred popular protests, which the government addressed by launching a few reforms and holding pro-Putin rallies. In March 2012, Putin was (re)elected president by a wide margin. The day after Putin’s inauguration in May 2012, the legislature confirmed Medvedev as prime minister.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0274/2020 14.9.2020 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy pursuant to Rule 132(2) of the Rules of Procedure on the situation in Belarus (2020/2779(RSP)) Kati Piri, Tonino Picula, Norbert Neuser, Robert Biedroń on behalf of the S&D Group RE\1213222EN.docx PE655.465v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0274/2020 European Parliament resolution on the situation in Belarus (2020/2779(RSP)) The European Parliament, – having regard to its previous resolutions on Belarus, in particular those of 4 October 2018 on the deterioration of media freedom1, of 19 April 2018 on Belarus following the local elections of 18 February 20182, of 24 November 2016 on the situation in Belarus following the parliamentary elections of 11 September 20163 and of 8 October 2015 on the death penalty in Belarus4, – having regard to the Conclusions by the President of the European Council following the video conference of the members of the European Council of 19 August 2020, – having regard to the declarations by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union of 11 August 2020 on the presidential elections and of 11 September 2020 on the escalation of violence and intimidation against members of the Coordination Council, – having regard to the statements by the High Representative/Vice-President, in particular those of 7 August 2020 ahead of the presidential elections and of 14
    [Show full text]