DOCSLIB.ORG

SOMERSET ELECTORAL REVIEW – County Council’S Response

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SOMERSET ELECTORAL REVIEW – County Council’S Response SOMERSET ELECTORAL REVIEW – County Council’s response LGBCE PROPOSALS 1. Summary of the LGBCE’s proposals: In summary the LGBCE proposals:- • Accept the proposal for 55 councillors but based on 53 divisions therefore providing for two, two member divisions where the LGBCE consider these as the only acceptable option to resolve unique local circumstances • Accept the population projections that accompanied the Council’s proposed scheme • Are defended as reflecting communication links, geographic factors and community identity • Are broadly in line with the Council’s proposals for West Somerset, Sedgemoor and rural South Somerset with some changes which focus on improving electorate equality in comparison with the Council’s proposals • Depart from the Council’s proposals in a number of urban areas, including Frome, Glastonbury, Street, Yeovil, Taunton and Wellington. It is no surprise that some of these areas provided most of the difficulties for the Council in agreeing proposals. • Present almost a total redesign of the Council’s proposed scheme for the Taunton Deane area • Redesign the Council’s proposals for the Frome area, propose a two member division to resolve the Glastonbury / Street problem, and adopt the Liberal Democrat proposal for rural Mendip • Include within the redesign of the Yeovil town area another 2 member division covering the Brympton & Yeovil West area to deal with a specific issue concerning the Brimsmore housing development. • Rename a number of proposed new divisions • In overview, have a detrimental impact on coterminosity with district wards compared to the Council’s proposals. The LGBCE defend this on the key need to balance electorate numbers and the fact that many of the district ward arrangements are out of date and don’t necessarily reflect community interests. The departures from the Council’s proposals are defended by the LGBCE on the basis of achieving a better balance between electoral equality, community identity and facilitating effective and convenient local government. Having compared their departures from the Council proposals, their approach seems to focus very much on ensuring equality of electorate numbers and sometimes at the expense of community identity and facilitating effective and convenient local government. 2. A summary critique of the LGBCE proposals: The Council wishes to make the following observations:- • The LGBCE report in support of their proposals contains little detailed explanation. Initially, there was no detail information provided behind the electorate numbers per division although this was subsequently provided on request. The Council’s view is that sufficient information should be provided by the LGBCE from the outset in support of their proposals so all potential respondees have adequate information available to enable them to provide an informed response. • The on-line maps in support of the proposals are particularly disappointing and hard to access and interpret particularly for parish councils and wider community interests. • The LGBCE must ensure that their technical guidance is clear in terms of what they expect from schemes proposed to them and then must apply it consistently when making their own proposals. For example, they should make clear from the outset that they will have less regard to coterminosity where district ward arrangements are ‘old’ and they should advise councils similarly. • The proposal for 2 member divisions is an interesting development and the Council wasn’t aware that this was an option that it could have proposed. Clarity on this from the commission from the outset on this issue would have been helpful. • It is clear from their proposals that the Commission have toured the area looking at particular local issues but the Council considers that the proposals at a local level reflect the fact that generally speaking the LGBCE do not talk to local communities or interests ‘on the ground’ when they tour. The treatment of Wellington is an example of how geographical layouts of communities do not always reflect long established communities of interest. • Of considerable concern is a perceived lack of consistency in the way the LGBCE have applied their logic from district area to district area. • A particular concern is the impact on community interests in certain areas in order to balance electorate numbers. In some cases in the rural areas the changes from the Council’s proposals move significant geographical areas against community interests for the sake of transferring very small numbers of the electors. • Some of the proposals impact significantly on town and parish council warding arrangements. The County Council has not had time to review these impacts in detail in its response. Our expectation is that local councils will respond direct to your invitation to submit comments. 3. The LGBCE Proposals – Area by Area West Somerset General Council commentary: The LGBCE proposals recognise and reflect the limited options available for change in this area. The only changes that the LGBCE have made to the County Council’s proposals appear to have been made purely on the grounds of balancing the electorate numbers between divisions rather than reflecting community interests or providing for effective and convenient local government. The LGBCE claim to have had regard to coterminosity with district ward arrangements in this area because the ward arrangements were agreed relatively recently but the Council notes that the changes proposed to its proposals reduce coterminosity in order to transfer relatively small numbers of electorate between divisions. Commission’s proposals: Council commentary: • Rural West Somerset - the LGBCE are The LGBCE acknowledges that this increases the size of an already proposing two changes to the Council’s large ED but justifies this on the numbers priority. Their proposal adds a proposals and these are defended on the considerable area of land to the ED for the purpose of adding just 228 to grounds of minimising electoral variances. the electorate. Although large the Council considers that the revised The first proposal is to transfer the parishes of ED remains manageable. Luxborough and Treborough from Dunster ED to Dulverton & Exmoor ED • The second ‘balancing the numbers’ change Likewise the Bicknoller change appears to be just to balance the is to transfer Bicknoller from the Watchet & numbers and worsens coterminosity with the district ward arrangements. Quantocks ED to Dunster. If the LGBCE decide to confirm these new arrangements then the Council would recommend a name change to the ED to reflect the transfer of 2 of the 6 Quantock parishes from Watchet & Quantocks ED to Watchet & Stogursey ED which better reflects the revised geographical spread of the division. Sedgemoor General Council commentary: In the main the Council’s proposals were accepted by the LGBCE. However, the Council has concerns over some of the changes proposed by the LGBCE and the reasons given for them. Commission’s proposals: Council commentary: • Bridgwater town – the only change proposed The justification for this change is to lessen the impact of the bottleneck to the Council’s proposals was to remove the and improve road access but in essence the change achieves neither of bottleneck bringing the two district wards these objectives. In fact the change doesn’t improve road access together within the Bridgwater West ED. Road between the two district wards that make up the ED and reduces access has been improved by the transfer of coterminosity with the newly established district wards. It therefore the Washington Gardens area from Bridgwater seems hard to justify. South to Bridgwater West. This further improves electoral equality. • Burnham-on-Sea and Highbridge - the LGBCE The area proposed to be transferred from Highbridge & Burnham South argued that the Council’s proposal on the ED to Burnham North ED goes against the agreement reached between southern edge of the Highbridge & Burnham the 3 local county councillors who were insistent that the current South ED didn’t reflect community identify. boundary between the two divisions reflects local community interests. The LGBCE alternative restores the southern The area chosen for transfer seems quite arbitrary. boundary of the Highbridge & Burnham South ED and instead transfers a residential area to the east of Oxford Street into Burnham North ED. They argue this alternative provides stronger boundaries, improves electoral equality and ensures that the town council is contained within 2 rather than 3 EDs. • Rural Sedgemoor – only two adjustments are This proposal improves coterminosity with the district ward and is clearly proposed by the LGBCE to the Council’s supported by the parish council. The Council therefore has no further proposals for the whole of the rural observations to make. Sedgemoor area. They have responded to representations from Goathurst PC to object to the Council’s proposal to include the parish in the North Petherton ED on the grounds that it would break the parish’s community ties to Enmore. Therefore the LGBCE have proposed including Goathurst in the Cannington ED. • Rural Sedgemoor – the other change is to This change from the Council’s proposals appears to have been done move Chilton Polden parish from King Alfred simply to increase the electorate numbers within the revised Huntspill ED to Huntspill ED simply to improve electoral ED. The change does not reflect local community interests and it equality. reduces coterminosity with the recently revised district ward arrangements. Taunton Deane General commentary: • The LGBCE proposals for the whole of the Taunton Deane area depart from both the County Council and Liberal Democrat Group proposals on the grounds that neither proposal “provided an effective balance between our three statutory criteria”. • This total redesign became inevitable following the changes proposed to the key urban areas of Taunton and Wellington and their proposal acknowledges this. The Council through the work done to develop its own proposals is aware that the treatment of the urban areas within Taunton Deane has significant knock on impacts for the surrounding rural EDs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MAP REFERRED to in the BOROUGH of TAUNTON DEANE Created by the Ordnance Survey Boundaries Section, Southampton, SO16 4GU
    Sheet 3 3 MAP REFERRED TO IN THE BOROUGH OF TAUNTON DEANE Created by the Ordnance Survey Boundaries Section, Southampton, SO16 4GU. 2 1 Tel: 023 8030 5092 Fax: 023 8079 2035 (ELECTORAL CHANGES) ORDER 2007 SHEET 3 OF 3 © Crown Copyright 2007 SHEET 3, MAP 3 Taunton Deane Borough. Parish Wards in Bishop's Lydeard Parish E N A L E AN D L L OO O P O D W UN RO Roebuck Farm Wes t So mer set Rai lway A 3 5 8 Ashfield Farm Aisholt Wood Quarry L (dis) IL H E E R T H C E E B Hawkridge Common All Saints' Church E F Aisholt AN L L A TE X Triscombe A P Triscombe Quarry Higher Aisholt G O Quarries K O Farm C (Stone) (disused) BU L OE H I R L L Quarry (dis) Flaxpool Roebuck Gate Farm Quarry (dis) Scale : 1cm = 0.1000 km Quarry (dis) Grid interval 1km Heathfield Farm Luxborough Farm Durborough Lower Aisholt Farm Caravan G Site O O D 'S L Triscombe A N W House Quarry E e Luxborough s t (dis) S A Farm o 3 m 5 8 e Quarry r s e (dis) t R a i l w a y B Quarry O A (dis) R P A T H L A N E G ood R E E N 'S Smokeham R H OCK LANE IL Farm L L HIL AK Lower Merridge D O OA BR Rock Farm ANE HAM L SMOKE E D N Crowcombe e A L f Heathfield K Station C O R H OL FO Bishpool RD LA Farm NE N EW Rich's Holford RO AD WEST BAGBOROUGH CP Courtway L L I H S E O H f S H e E OL S FOR D D L R AN E E O N Lambridge H A L Farm E Crowcombe Heathfield L E E R N H N T E K Quarry West Bagborough Kenley (dis) Farm Cricket Ground BIRCHES CORNER E AN Quarry 'S L RD Quarry (dis) FO BIN (dis) D Quarry e f (dis) Tilbury Park Football Pitch Coursley W e s t S Treble's Holford o m e E Quarry L
    [Show full text]
  • 34 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    34 bus time schedule & line map 34 Charlton Horethorne View In Website Mode The 34 bus line Charlton Horethorne has one route. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Charlton Horethorne: 4:20 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 34 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 34 bus arriving. Direction: Charlton Horethorne 34 bus Time Schedule 29 stops Charlton Horethorne Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 4:20 PM Sexeys School, Bruton Cole Mead, Bruton Tuesday 4:20 PM Bruton School, Pitcombe Wednesday 4:20 PM Cliff Hill, Shepton Montague Thursday 4:20 PM Friday 4:20 PM The Montague Inn, Shepton Montague Saturday Not Operational Church Walk, Bratton Seymour Seymour Lodge, Bratton Seymour King Arthur's School, West Hill 34 bus Info Direction: Charlton Horethorne West Hill House, West Hill Stops: 29 Trip Duration: 66 min Football Lane, West Hill Line Summary: Sexeys School, Bruton, Bruton School, Pitcombe, Cliff Hill, Shepton Montague, The Montague Inn, Shepton Montague, Church Walk, Market Place, Wincanton Bratton Seymour, Seymour Lodge, Bratton Seymour, Greyhound Close, Wincanton King Arthur's School, West Hill, West Hill House, West Hill, Football Lane, West Hill, Market Place, Memorial Hall, Wincanton Wincanton, Memorial Hall, Wincanton, Mount Carmel 50 High Street, Wincanton Primary School, Wincanton, Swc Depot, Wincanton, Carmel Villas, Wincanton, North Cheriton Cemetery, Mount Carmel Primary School, Wincanton South Cheriton, White Horse Inn, South Cheriton, Mill Cottage, Horsington,
    [Show full text]
  • Walking Walking
    SSDC_walks leaflet-20pp_NOV19.indd 1 leaflet-20pp_NOV19.indd SSDC_walks 15/11/2019 13:03 15/11/2019 At the next crossroads turn right; after about 100m turn left onto a surfaced discoversouthsomerset.com 6 road. Yeovil the to back and gates 4 7 4 7 track past some houses. After the second (white) house bear left and follow 4 7 Walks Norton-sub-Hamdon to Chinnock East Ladies Walk, Montacute Walk, Ladies miles km miles km a signposted footpath between a copse and a ditch. Go over the stile and walk miles km these through Pass old. years 200 along the top of the next fi eld and through the gate at Townsend Farm onto about are these of most trees; mature 2 Coldharbour Lane. Views to the south are superb, with Pen Wood opposite of abundance the to due site wildlife (restricted access now allowed). county a is itself park The 1601. East Coker Parish Walk Hardington Parish Walk Turn left up the farm drive to a road (Penn Lane) and follow the signposted West Coker Parish Walk in family Phelips the by built House, 7 Montacute of view good a is There path across the road to the right of the buildings. Pass next to the buildings Designed by: www.rocketbox.co.uk ©SSDC 2018 ©SSDC www.rocketbox.co.uk by: Designed This walk visits the villages of West Coker and East Coker with hill. steep means Montacute as Hill Hymerford House is reported to be the home of William Dampier a This walk has many spectacular views of South Somerset and Dorset.
    [Show full text]
  • River Brue's Historic Bridges by David Jury
    River Brue’s Historic Bridges By David Jury The River Brue’s Historic Bridges In his book "Bridges of Britain" Geoffrey Wright writes: "Most bridges are fascinating, many are beautiful, particularly those spanning rivers in naturally attractive settings. The graceful curves and rhythms of arches, the texture of stone, the cold hardness of iron, the stark simplicity of iron, form constant contrasts with the living fluidity of the water which flows beneath." I cannot add anything to that – it is exactly what I see and feel when walking the rivers of Somerset and discover such a bridge. From source to sea there are 58 bridges that span the River Brue, they range from the simple plank bridge to the enormity of the structures that carry the M5 Motorway. This article will look at the history behind some of those bridges. From the river’s source the first bridge of note is Church Bridge in South Brewham, with it’s downstream arch straddling the river between two buildings. Figure 1 - Church Bridge South Brewham The existing bridge is circa 18th century but there was a bridge recorded here in 1258. Reaching Bruton, we find Church Bridge described by John Leland in 1525 as the " Est Bridge of 3 Archys of Stone", so not dissimilar to what we have today, but in 1757 the bridge was much narrower “barely wide enough for a carriage” and was widened on the east side sometime in the early part of the 19th century. Figure 2 - Church Bridge Bruton Close by we find that wonderful medieval Bow Bridge or Packhorse Bridge constructed in the 15th century with its graceful slightly pointed chamfered arch.
    [Show full text]
  • 5888 the London Gazette, October 30
    5888 THE LONDON GAZETTE, OCTOBER 30, easterly fence of the main-road to Clanville Gate, 2. This Order shall take effect from and imme- thence by the north-easterly fence of the road to diately after the first day of November, one Clanville, thence by the easterly fence of five thousand eight hundred and eighty-eight. fields through which a footpath runs from Clan- Herbert M. Sufi. ville to Suttou in the parish of Ditcheat, thence by the south-easterly fence of the road to Brook House, thence by the southerly fence of East SCHEDULE. Hill-lane to the Somerset and Dorset Railway, An Area in the counties of Dorset and Somer- and thence by the Somerset and Dorset Railway set, comprising in the county of Dorset, the poor to' the said Bridge near Cole Station aforesaid, law parishes of Purse Caundlc, in the petty (4.) in the counties of Dorset and Somerset, sessional division of Sherborne, Stourton Cauridle, comprising, in. the, county of Dorset the civil Stalbridge, Marnhull, and Fifehead Magdalen, in parishes «-f Buckhorn "Weston and Kington Magna, the petty sessional division of Sturmiuster. and and the portions of the parishes of Gillingham and West Stour, East Stour, Todber, Stour Provost, Silton lying within the following boundaries, that Motcombe, Gillingham, Bourton Silton, Buck- is to say, commencing at a point in the parish of horn Weston. and Kington Magna, in the petty "IGfiUmglinm where the north-eastern boundary of sessional division of Shaftesbury ; and comprising the parish of Kinglon Magna adjoining Gillingham in the county of
    [Show full text]
  • Sol\IERSETSHIRE .. TAUNTON
    DIRECTORY.] SOl\IERSETSHIRE .. TAUNTON. 357 • • J. Heathcote M.A. & the Rev. W. G. Fitzgerald hon. Clerk to the Trustees of the Market, Thomas J ames Shepherd, chaplains;- Rev. L. H. P. Maurica M.A. acting chaplain ; Castle green A Co. Capt. H. C. Sweet; B Co. Capt. E. T. Alms; Sergt.­ Collector of the Market, C. J. Fox, Castle green Major E. Willey, drill instructor Collector of Income & Assessed Taxes, St. Mary Magdalene Parish, William Waterman, 31 Paul street; St. James', TAUNTON UNION~ John Mattocks Chapman, 10 Canon street Board day, fortnightly, wednesday, at 2.go, at the Work­ Collector of Inland Revenue, Wm. Furze Bickford, Forest house. Collector of Poor Rates for St. Mary Magdalene Without, The Union comprises the following parishes :-Angersleigh, William Henry Wake, Church square; St. Mary :Magda­ Ash Priors, Bickenhall, Bishops Hull (Within & Without), lene Within, David Poole Hewer, Upper High street; St. Bishops Lydeard, Cheddon Fitzpaine, Churchstanton James Within & Without, John Mattocks Chapman, 10 (Devon), Combe Florey, Corfe, Cothelstone, Creech St. Canon street; Bishops Hull Within & Without, J. l\Iayes, Miehael, Curland, Durston, Halse, Hatch Beauchamp, Bishops Hull Heathfield, Kingston, Lydeard St. Lawrence, North County Analyst, Henry James Alford M.n., F.c.s. 2 :\'Iarl­ Curry, N orton Fitzwarren, Orchard Portman, Otterford, borough terrace Pitminster, Ruishton, Staplegrove, Staple Fitzpaine, County Surveyor, Charles Edmond Norman, 12 Hammet st Stoke St. Gregory, Stoke St. Mary, Taunton St. James Curator of Somerset Archreological & Natural History (Without & Within), Taunton St. Mary Magdalane (With­ Society, William Bidgood, The Castle out & Within), Thornfalcon, Thurlbear, Tolland, Trull, Deputy Clerk of the Peace for the.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Family Documents the Stones of Chipstable, Somerset
    1 STONE FAMILY DOCUMENTS THE STONES OF CHIPSTABLE, SOMERSET These family documents were found in the estate of Elizabeth Boyd Bond Evans of Cambridge, England (deceased December 2012). They were obtained at auction at Cheffins of Cambridge for John C. Stone II by Elizabeth Howard in July 2013. Most of the documents relate to descendants of Richard Stone of Clayhanger, Devon and Chipstable, Somerset, who died in 1653. Richard’s estimated date of birth is late 1570s, e.g. 1579. His will was obtained from the UK Archives and names his descendants. The will of the widow of his eldest son John (Richord Parkhouse Stone) also was obtained from the UK Archives and helps define some of Richard’s descendants. Richard was married twice. The name of his first wife, whom he married about 1600, remains unknown. Six children were born to this first marriage, of whom four married and three produced heirs. The two female lines of descent have been difficult to establish, but the lone male heir who had offspring, Emanuel Stone, had nine or ten children. The line of descent from Emanuel’s oldest son and heir, Richard Stone 1640 (baptized in Chipstable), can be traced to the present day. The absence of 16c parish records and paucity of 17c records in Chipstable and Ashbrittle (due in large part to the civil war of the 17c) have made it impossible to determine accurately the lines of Emanuel’s other eight or nine children with any accuracy. Richard’s second marriage was prior to 1640 to a woman named Eleanor (possibly Eleanor Farthinge who was born in Clayhanger in 1604).
    [Show full text]
  • Local Environment Agency Plan T
    EA-South West LEAPs local environment agency plan RIVER TONE ACTION PLAN DECEMBER 2000 BRISTOL BRIDGWATER T T E n v ir o n m e n t HAg en c y tf v S o A U n >s E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House. Waterside Drive. Aztec West. Almondsbury. Bristol BS3 2 4UD {?%§$ Environment ^ J AGENCY Wclcome to the second edition of the Environment Agency's newsletter for the River Tone area. If you would like more information on any issues raised in this Newsletter, or more copies, please contact the LEAPs team on 01278 457333. ^ The kiver Tone Catchment ^ Gcod news for West Country divers The Tone rises in the Brendon Hills and The news was announced in September flows for 33 km before joining the that the quality of rivers in the South River Parrett at Burrowbridge. The West of England is the best in the catchment also includes the Bridgwater country. Chemical water quality sampling and Taunton canal, Clatworthy carried out between 1997-1999 shows a Reservoir, the towns of Taunton and 33% improvement in quality since 1990. Wellington and part of the Somerset Levels and Moors. 4.2 km of the River Tone has improved from poor to very good quality over the last 10 years. Much of this improvement is down to the work on controlling soil erosion by the Agency and the Somerset Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group, and to improvements to sewage treatment by the water companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Spend Over 500 April 20
    Spend Over £500 for the month of April 2020 Date of Expenditure Department Beneficiary Purpose of Expenditure Amount (net) Merchant Category 09-Apr-20 Tenant - Extra Care M B H INDUSTRIAL SERVICES LTD Bldgs - Compliance Costs 710.00 PREMISES RELATED EXPENDITURE 09-Apr-20 Asset Asset Management M B H INDUSTRIAL SERVICES LTD Bldgs - Compliance Costs 725.00 PREMISES RELATED EXPENDITURE 08-Apr-20 Tenant - Extra Care T & C ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS LTD Bldgs - Planned Maintenance 1,188.61 PREMISES RELATED EXPENDITURE 20-Apr-20 Improvements HRA T & C ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS LTD Refurbishment 6,312.50 CAPITAL 29-Apr-20 Tenant - Extra Care T & C ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS LTD Bldgs - Planned Maintenance 1,295.17 PREMISES RELATED EXPENDITURE 29-Apr-20 Tenant - Extra Care T & C ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS LTD Bldgs - Responsive Maintenance 1,650.82 PREMISES RELATED EXPENDITURE 29-Apr-20 Tenant - Extra Care T & C ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS LTD Bldgs - Planned Maintenance 2,224.05 PREMISES RELATED EXPENDITURE 29-Apr-20 Tenant - Extra Care T & C ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS LTD Bldgs - Planned Maintenance 543.46 PREMISES RELATED EXPENDITURE 29-Apr-20 Tenant - Extra Care T & C ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS LTD Bldgs - Planned Maintenance 1,051.16 PREMISES RELATED EXPENDITURE 29-Apr-20 Tenant - Extra Care T & C ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS LTD Bldgs - Responsive Maintenance 1,351.45 PREMISES RELATED EXPENDITURE 03-Apr-20 Partnerships WESTERN FABRICATIONS LTD Bldgs - Planned Maintenance 784.03 PREMISES RELATED EXPENDITURE 03-Apr-20 Partnerships WESTERN FABRICATIONS LTD Bldgs - Planned
    [Show full text]
  • SWT Housing Newsletter 2020
    WINTER 2020 Housing News Great Homes for Local Communities Introduction from Cllr Francesca Smith (Housing Portfolio Holder) Welcome to our December issue of the Somerset West and Taunton Housing Newsletter. Going forward we intend to produce a newsletter for you to read every quarter. The next one will be due in spring and you can also find this newsletter online at www.somersetwestandtaunton.gov.uk. We have all been through so much this year, especially with lockdowns during the year. Just as we were gaining momentum after the first lockdown, we had to lock down again. We will of course continue to support our residents during the global pandemic and reduce the risk of spreading the coronavirus. Despite, the difficulties this year, the Housing Directorate has continued to deliver against their objectives of delivering more new homes, providing great customer services and improving our existing homes and neighbourhoods. I hope you enjoy reading about the great things that have been achieved in this edition. The future of Local Government still remains subject to change and I wrote to you in November to make you aware of those changes. You may wish to look through the “Stronger Somerset” (www. strongersomerset.co.uk) and “One Council” (www.onesomerset.org.uk) information to familiarise yourself with the current situation. Lastly but certainly not least “I wish you all a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!” Annual Report 2019/2020 Highlights 83% of our Deane Helpline Our Debt & customers rated the service Benefit Advisor they received as excellent helped 444 tenants We spent 7.9 million repairing, maintaining and We completed 41 major improving your homes and disability adaptations and communal areas.
    [Show full text]
  • SOMERSETSHIRE. Jt'ar 543 Cox Bernard, Gawbridge Mi1ls, Mar- Creighton Charles, Farncombe Farm, Curry Thomas Hy
    TRADES DIRl!:CTORY.] SOMERSETSHIRE. Jt'AR 543 Cox Bernard, Gawbridge mi1ls, Mar- Creighton Charles, Farncombe farm, Curry Thomas Hy. Brean, Bridgwater took R.S.O Doulting, Shepton Mallet Curtis Cornelius, Chewton Mendip, Bath Cox Mrs. Charlotte, Frome Creighton Mrs. Ashwick, Bath Curtis Thos. Chilthorne Domer, Yeovil Cox E. Burtle, Edington, Bridgwater Crew Arthur, St. Catherine, Bath Dagg Thos. l:lhoscombe, Red post, Bath Cox Edmund, Catcott, Bridgwater Crick Brothers, Great Ash, Winsford, Dainton W. E. Rndge, Beckington, Bath Cox Fdk. Chesterblade, Shepton Mallet Dulverton R.S.O Dallimore W. Greendown, Litton, Bath Cox I<'rederick, Keynsham R.S.O Crick J. Devonscombe, Exford, Taunton Dallyn A. Old Clee"Ve, Washford R.S.O Cox Frederick,- Westbut-y, Wells Criddle John, Aisholt, Bridgwater Dallyn James, Oare ford, Barnstaple Cox George, Claverham, Yatton R.S.O Criddle John, Higher Oatley, Canning- Dallyn Richard, Nethercott, Winsford, Cox George, Yarrow, Bridgwater ton, Bridgwater Dulverton R.S.O Cox George Sidney, Whatley, Frome Criddle Richard, Westwick, near Worle, Dallyn William, Withypoole, Taunton Cox Henry, Easton, Wells Weston-super-Mare Dampier F. H.CombeSt.Nichola~,Chard Cox Isaac, jun. Egford, Whatley, Frome Cridge Edwin, Lopen, Ilminster Dampney Geo. Danl. Mudford, Ilchester Cox James, High Littleton, Bristol Cridge William, Lopen, llminster Dampney John, Closworth, Sherborne Cox James, Portishead S.O Cridland -,Curry Rivel, Taunton Dampney Richd.Seaborough,Crewkerne Cox James, Westbury, Wells Cridland V. B. Milton, Martock R.l:l.O Dampney Theophilus Tripe, Bridge & Cox Jeffery, Brean, Bridgwatrr CrispJ.Allowenshay,Kingston,llminster Darvole farms, East Coker, Yeovil Cox Jesse, Edington, Bridgwater Croad Mrs. George, Knights, Lydeard Dampney Wm.Chilthorne Domer, Yeovil Cox John, East Coker, Yeovil St.
    [Show full text]
  • Trades. [Somerset
    654 DAM TRADES. [SOMERSET. DAIRYMEN-continued Tucker Sidney, 24 .A.rgyle terrace, DENTISTS. Bawlings Frederick, High st. Keyn- Lower Bristol road, Bath Marked thus t are Licentiates im sham, :Bristol Tucker W.W.Brent Knoll, Highbridge Dental Surgery of the Royal College· Retail Dairy Co. Ltd. (branch dairy), Tucker Wm. Chipstable, Wiveliscmb of Surgeons of England. St. George'e, Worle, Weston- Turner J. Beer Crocombe, Taunton Marked thus *_are Licentiates in super-Mare Turvey Rt. 40 High st, Glastonbury S h R Reynolds W .ComptonPauncefoot,Bath Veal Gilbert, 25 Millmead road, Batl1 Dental urgery of t e oya1 Col1 ege Rhyme!!' Henry, Claverton Down,Bath Vickery Ernest Albert, Dollan's Pool, of Surgeons of Edinburgh. Richards Albert Edwd. Hurst,Martck Donyatt, Ilminster Marked thus 0 are Licentiates in Richards Clifford Henry, 54 High st. Vigar Samuel,Coombe street, Bruton Dental Surgery of the Royal Faculty- Burnham-on-Sea Vilven Miss .Ann, I George's place, of Physicians&Surgeons of Glasgow. Richards Slocombe, Broughton, Stoke Bathwick hill. Bath Marked thus t are Licentiates in- St. Mary, Taunton W,noont Robert, Lock, Chilthorne Dental Surgery of Royal College of Ricketts Levi W. 8 Tal bot st. Yeovil Domer, Yeovil Surgeons in Ireland. Rosewell Fred, Monks dairy, Isle Vowles Samuel, n St. James' street, tAckland Donald L.R.C.P.Lond., Brewers, Taunton . Weston-super-Mare . M.R.C.S.Eng. II Circus, Bath Rosewell Wm. H. Love la. Ilmmster Walden John Arth. 74 Beer st. Yeovll tAUen-Smith Chas.R.Hl Gay st. Bath Rowe Albert Edward, Hollowells Warfield Arthur, Rowlands, Ashill, *.A.nderson Robert Legget .Ansford dairy, Cricket St.
    [Show full text]