DOCSLIB.ORG

An Annual Summary of the State's Economic Geology.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 2045 MORSE RD., BLDG. C-1 COLUMBUS, OHIO 43229-6693 (614) 265-6576 (614) 447-1918 (FAX) E-Mail: [email protected] World Wide Web: http://www.OhioGeology.com/ 2011 Report on Ohio Mineral Industries: An Annual Summary of the State's Economic Geology WITH DIRECTORIES OF REPORTING COAL AND INDUSTRIAL MINERAL OPERATORS compiled by Mark E. Wolfe Database design and data retrieval: Joseph G. Wells Interactive mineral industries map/digital cartography: Dean R. Martin Columbus 2012 Recommended citation: Wolfe, M.E., compiler, 2012, 2011 Report on Ohio mineral industries—An annual summary of the state’s economic geology: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, 35 p., 8 appendices. Editing: Charles R. Salmons Layout: Lisa Van Doren CONTENTS Foreword ................................................................................................................................ v Preface ................................................................................................................................... vi Mineral industries in Ohio during the American Civil War and Reconstruction .............. 1 2011 Ohio ecomomic geology in brief ................................................................................... 6 Coal ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Industrial minerals ............................................................................................................... 14 Limestone and dolomite .................................................................................................. 17 Sand and gravel ............................................................................................................... 21 Sandstone and conglomerate .......................................................................................... 24 Clay .................................................................................................................................. 26 Shale ................................................................................................................................ 27 Salt ................................................................................................................................... 28 Gypsum ............................................................................................................................ 29 Peat .................................................................................................................................. 29 Oil and gas ............................................................................................................................. 30 References cited .................................................................................................................... 34 Appendix A 2011 Coal companies with sales or production .............................................................. A-1 2011 Ohio alphabetical directory of producing coal mine operators ............................. A-2 2011 Ohio directory of coal preparation plants and associated facilities, by county ... A-6 2011 Ohio directory of producing coal mine operators, by county ................................ A-8 Appendix B 2011 Ohio alphabetical directory of industrial-mineral mine operators ...................... B-1 Appendix C 2011 Limestone/dolomite companies with sales or production ..................................... C-1 2011 Ohio directory of limestone/dolomite mine operators reporting sales or produc- tion, by county ............................................................................................................ C-2 Appendix D 2011 Sand and gravel companies with sales or production .......................................... D-1 2011 Ohio directory of sand and gravel mining operators reporting sales or produc- tion, by county ............................................................................................................ D-3 Appendix E 2011 Sandstone/conglomerate companies with sales or production ............................. E-1 2011 Ohio directory of sandstone/conglomerate mine operators reporting sales or pro- duction, by county ...................................................................................................... E-2 Appendix F 2011 Clay companies with sales or production .............................................................. F-1 2011 Ohio directory of clay mine operators reporting sales or production, by county ... F-2 Appendix G 2011 Shale companies with sales or production ............................................................ G-1 2011 Ohio directory of shale mine operators reporting sales or production, by county .. G-2 Appendix H 2011 Ohio directory of salt mine and salt-brining plant operators reporting sales or production, by county ................................................................................................ H-1 FIGURES 1. Graph showing value of coal, nonfuel minerals, and oil and gas in Ohio .................... 6 2. Map showing coal production in Ohio in 2011, by county and quantity ...................... 8 3. Graph showing sales and value of coal in Ohio ............................................................. 8 4. Stratigraphic column of coals mined in Ohio during 2011 ............................................ 8 5. Map showing sales of limestone and dolomite in Ohio in 2011, by county and quantity 17 6. Graph showing sales and value of limestone and dolomite in Ohio ............................. 17 7. Stratigraphic column of industrial minerals mined in Ohio during 2011 .................... 20 8. Map showing sales of sand and gravel in Ohio in 2011, by county and quantity ........ 21 9. Graph showing sales and value of sand and gravel in Ohio ......................................... 21 iii FIGURES, cont. 10. Map showing sales of sandstone and conglomerate in Ohio in 2011, by county and quantity ...................................................................................................................... 24 11. Graph showing sales and value of sandstone and conglomerate in Ohio .................... 24 12. Map showing clay sales in Ohio in 2011, by county and quantity ................................ 26 13. Graph showing sales and value of clay in Ohio ............................................................. 26 14. Map showing shale sales in Ohio in 2011, by county and quantity .............................. 27 15. Graph showing sales and value of shale in Ohio ........................................................... 27 16. Map showing counties producing salt and peat in Ohio in 2011 and their rankings in sales ............................................................................................................................ 28 17. Graph showing sales and value of salt in Ohio ............................................................. 28 18. Graph showing sales and value of gypsum in Ohio ....................................................... 29 19. Graph showing sales and value of peat in Ohio ............................................................ 29 20. Map showing new wells drilled and completed for oil and gas in Ohio in 2011, by county ......................................................................................................................... 30 21. Graph showing production of oil and gas in Ohio ......................................................... 30 TABLES 175 years of economic geology in Ohio ........................................................................... vi 1. 2011 Mineral sales and production in Ohio ................................................................... 6 2. 2011 Ohio coal production, by county and mining method ........................................... 9 3. 2011 Ohio coal production and sales, by county, in descending order of produc tion ... 9 4. 2011 Ohio coal production, by production size group and change from 2010 .............. 9 5. 2011 Ohio coal production, by county and month .......................................................... 10 6. 2011 Ohio coal production, by county and seam ........................................................... 10 7. 2011 Disposition of Ohio coal, by county ........................................................................ 12 8. 2011 Dollar value of coal at mine, by county and mining method ................................ 12 9. 2011 Ohio coal mine employment, by occupational group and month ......................... 13 10. 2011 Wage and salary payments to Ohio coal mine employees, by county and occu- pational group ............................................................................................................ 13 11. 2011 Value of Ohio industrial minerals ......................................................................... 14 12. 2011 Employment at Ohio industrial-mineral operations, by county and commod i ty .. 15 13. 2011 Ohio limestone and dolomite sales, by county and use ........................................ 18 14. 2011 Production of lime from Ohio stone, by county and use ....................................... 19 15. 2011 Ohio sand and gravel sales, by county and use .................................................... 22 16. 2011 Ohio sales of crushed sandstone and conglomerate, by county and use ............. 25 17. 2011
Recommended publications
  • Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. Vol. 46, 1935, Pl. 33

    Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. Vol. 46, 1935, Pl. 33

    BULL. GEOL. SOC. AM. VOL. 46, 1935, PL. 33 F ig u r e 2. E a stern F a ce o f t h e Q uarry DUNDEE-ANDERDON CONTACT IN SIBLEY QUARRY Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/46/3/425/3415212/BUL46_3-0425.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY CfF A M E R IC A VOL. 46, PP. 428-462, PLS. 33-39, 1 FIG. MARCH 31. 1935 PROCEEDINGS OF THE PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE DUNDEE LIMESTONE OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN* BY CHARLES FERNANDO BASSETT (Presented before the Paleontological Society, December SO, 193S) CONTENTS Page Introduction............................................................................................................. 425 Statement of the problem................................................................................ 425 Acknowledgments............................................................................................. 427 Stratigraphy of the Dundee limestone................................................................... 427 Distribution....................................................................................................... 427 Previous classification...................................................................................... 427 Description of sections..................................................................................... 428 Sibley quarry............................................................................................. 428 Christiancy or Macon quarry.................................................................
  • OGS 1962 RI-42.Pdf

    OGS 1962 RI-42.Pdf

    ·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·i i STATE CE OHIO • MICHAEL V. DISALLI, eo-- DD'AU'MEHT CE NATIJl\AL llES<XmCES Ilo IElllEl\T a, EAGON, Dlncllor In'ISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY l\AJ.PH J. KIUIHACEN, Chief Ii I• lo I REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO. 42 LOWER AND MIDDLE DEVONIAN LIMESTONES IN NORTHEASTERN OHIO • I • AND ADJACENT AREAS I i• I ~ ~ By i John W. Dow i II • I • I • I I • i I . • I I COLUMBUS ~ . 1962 I I • • I• I I • • I I ~-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-· STATE OF OHIO Michael V. DiSalle Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Herbert B. Eagon Director NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Herbert B. Eagon Lawrence Kimble Byron Frederick Roy M. Kottman Forrest G. Hall Demas L. Sears William Hoyne Myron T.· Sturgeon Joseph E. Hurst DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Ralph J. Bernhagen Chief The F . J . Heer Printing Company Columbus 16, Ohio 1962 Bound by the State of Ohio ;-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-~-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·i i• i I ~Of~ I• 0 MICHAEL V. DI SALLE, Governor lo DEPAR1MENT Of NATURAL RESOURCES I HERBERT II. EAGON, Director I DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RALPH J. BERNHAGEN, Chief • I • I.. I REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO. 42 i i;. ! .I .I I LOWER AND MIDDLE DEVONIAN LIMESTONES . IN NORTHEASTERN OHIO I • AND ADJACENT AREAS .I I• I.. I By i• John W. Dow I ! ! ! I • I • I • .I .I .I I I COLUMBUS • . 1962 I I • . I.. I For sale l::ry Ohio Division of Geological Survey, Columbus, Ohio I • Price 97 cents plus 3 cents tax in Ohio • I ~ ...... _...... ··-.- .- ·-.- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- ._,,. -.- .- .- .- .- .- . BLANK PAGE CONTENTS Page Introduction. 1 Purpose of study 1 Previous studies 1 Methods of investigation.
  • Cambrian Ordovician

    Cambrian Ordovician

    Open File Report LXXVI the shale is also variously colored. Glauconite is generally abundant in the formation. The Eau Claire A Summary of the Stratigraphy of the increases in thickness southward in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan where it becomes much more Southern Peninsula of Michigan * dolomitic. by: The Dresbach sandstone is a fine to medium grained E. J. Baltrusaites, C. K. Clark, G. V. Cohee, R. P. Grant sandstone with well rounded and angular quartz grains. W. A. Kelly, K. K. Landes, G. D. Lindberg and R. B. Thin beds of argillaceous dolomite may occur locally in Newcombe of the Michigan Geological Society * the sandstone. It is about 100 feet thick in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan but is absent in Northern Indiana. The Franconia sandstone is a fine to medium grained Cambrian glauconitic and dolomitic sandstone. It is from 10 to 20 Cambrian rocks in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan feet thick where present in the Southern Peninsula. consist of sandstone, dolomite, and some shale. These * See last page rocks, Lake Superior sandstone, which are of Upper Cambrian age overlie pre-Cambrian rocks and are The Trempealeau is predominantly a buff to light brown divided into the Jacobsville sandstone overlain by the dolomite with a minor amount of sandy, glauconitic Munising. The Munising sandstone at the north is dolomite and dolomitic shale in the basal part. Zones of divided southward into the following formations in sandy dolomite are in the Trempealeau in addition to the ascending order: Mount Simon, Eau Claire, Dresbach basal part. A small amount of chert may be found in and Franconia sandstones overlain by the Trampealeau various places in the formation.
  • Middle Devonian Formations in the Subsurface of Northwestern Ohio

    Middle Devonian Formations in the Subsurface of Northwestern Ohio

    STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Report of Investigations No. 78 MIDDLE DEVONIAN FORMATIONS IN THE SUBSURFACE OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO by A. Janssens Columbus 1970 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE OHIO DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION Horace R. Collins, State Geologist and Di v ision Chief David K. Webb, Jr., Geologist and Assistant Chief Eleanor J. Hyle, Secretary Jean S. Brown, Geologist and Editor Pauline Smyth, Geologist Betty B. Baber, Geologist REGIONAL GEOLOGY SECTION SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY SECTION Richard A. Struble, Geologist and Section Head William J. Buschman, Jr., Geologist and Section Head Richard M. Delong, Geologist Michael J. Clifford, Geologist G. William Kalb, Geochemist Adriaan J anssens, Geologist Douglas L. Kohout, Geologis t Frederick B. Safford, Geologist David A. Stith, Geologist Jam es Wooten, Geologist Aide Joel D. Vormelker, Geologist Aide Barbara J. Adams, Clerk· Typist B. Margalene Crammer, Clerk PUBLICATIONS SECTION LAKE ERIE SECTION Harold J. Fl inc, Cartographer and Section Head Charles E. Herdendorf, Geologist and Sectwn Head James A. Brown, Cartographer Lawrence L. Braidech, Geologist Donald R. Camburn, Cartovapher Walter R. Lemke, Boat Captain Philip J. Celnar, Cartographer David B. Gruet, Geologist Aide Jean J. Miller, Photocopy Composer Jean R. Ludwig, Clerk- Typist STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Report of Investigations No. 78 MIDDLE DEVONIAN FORMATIONS IN THE SUBSURFACE OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO by A. Janssens Columbus 1970 GEOLOGY SERVES OHIO CONTENTS Page Introduction . 1 Previous investigations .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 Study methods . 4 Detroit River Group . .. .. .. ... .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. 6 Sylvania Sandstone ..........................
  • Contents List of Illustrations LETTER OF

    Contents List of Illustrations LETTER OF

    STATE OF MICHIGAN Plate IV. A. Horizontal and oblique lamination, Sylvania MICHIGAN GEOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SURVEY Sandstone......................................................................27 Plate IV. B. Stratification and lamination, in sand dune, Dune Publication 2. Geological Series 1. Park, Ind.........................................................................28 THE MONROE FORMATION OF SOUTHERN Plate V. Sand grains, enlarged 14½ times ............................31 MICHIGAN AND ADJOINING REGIONS Plate VI. Desert sand grains, enlarged 14½ times ................31 by Plate VII. Sylvania and St. Peter sand grains, enlarged 14½ A. W. Grabau and W. H. Sherzer times. .............................................................................32 PUBLISHED AS PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR Figures 1909. Figure 1. Map showing distribution of Sylvania Sandstone. 25 LANSING, MICHIGAN WYNKOOP HALLENBECK CRAWFORD CO., STATE Figure 2. Cross bedding in Sylvania sandstone ....................27 PRINTERS Figure 3. Cross bedding on east wall of Toll’s Pit quarry ......28 1910 Figure 4. Cross bedding shown on south wall of Toll’s Pit quarry.............................................................................28 Contents Figure 5. Cross bedding on south wall of Toll’s Pit quarry in Sylvania sandstone. .......................................................28 Letter of Transmittal. ......................................................... 1 Figure 6. Cross bedding shown on south wall
  • Ordovician Land Plants and Fungi from Douglas Dam, Tennessee

    Ordovician Land Plants and Fungi from Douglas Dam, Tennessee

    PROOF The Palaeobotanist 68(2019): 1–33 The Palaeobotanist 68(2019): xxx–xxx 0031–0174/2019 0031–0174/2019 Ordovician land plants and fungi from Douglas Dam, Tennessee GREGORY J. RETALLACK Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA. *Email: gregr@uoregon. edu (Received 09 September, 2019; revised version accepted 15 December, 2019) ABSTRACT The Palaeobotanist 68(1–2): Retallack GJ 2019. Ordovician land plants and fungi from Douglas Dam, Tennessee. The Palaeobotanist 68(1–2): xxx–xxx. 1–33. Ordovician land plants have long been suspected from indirect evidence of fossil spores, plant fragments, carbon isotopic studies, and paleosols, but now can be visualized from plant compressions in a Middle Ordovician (Darriwilian or 460 Ma) sinkhole at Douglas Dam, Tennessee, U. S. A. Five bryophyte clades and two fungal clades are represented: hornwort (Casterlorum crispum, new form genus and species), liverwort (Cestites mirabilis Caster & Brooks), balloonwort (Janegraya sibylla, new form genus and species), peat moss (Dollyphyton boucotii, new form genus and species), harsh moss (Edwardsiphyton ovatum, new form genus and species), endomycorrhiza (Palaeoglomus strotheri, new species) and lichen (Prototaxites honeggeri, new species). The Douglas Dam Lagerstätte is a benchmark assemblage of early plants and fungi on land. Ordovician plant diversity now supports the idea that life on land had increased terrestrial weathering to induce the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event in the sea and latest Ordovician (Hirnantian)
  • 76-9949 CHAPEL, James David, 1948- PETROLOGY and DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY of DEVONIAN CARBONATES in OHIO

    76-9949 CHAPEL, James David, 1948- PETROLOGY and DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY of DEVONIAN CARBONATES in OHIO

    76-9949 CHAPEL, James David, 1948- PETROLOGY AND DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY OF DEVONIAN CARBONATES IN OHIO. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1975 Geology Xerox University Microfilms,Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 PETROLOGY AND EEPOSITIONAL HISTORY OF. DEVONIAN CARBONATES IN OHIO DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Chio State University bY Janes David Chapel, B.A, * * * * * The Ohio State University Reading Coirmittee: Approved Ey Professor Charles H. Summerson Professor Kenneth 0. Stanley //?//? Professor James W. Collinson v Adviser Department of Geology and Mineralogy ACKNOWIEDGMENTS ivy deepest thanks go to Dr. C. H. Summerson for his guidance and encouragement during the course of the research and for his critical reading of several drafts of the manuscript. I also wish to thank Dr. J. W. Collinson and Dr. K. 0. Stanley for their discussion and criticism of material presented in this dissertation. Special thanks go to Mr. A. Janssens of the Ohio Division of Geological Survey who discussed stratigraphic problems with the author on several occasions and provided access to unpublished stratigraphic data. I am especially indebted to the owners and officials of numerous stone companies who permitted me to study the sections in their quarries and who, in some cases, provided access to drill cores. In this regard \ special thanks are. extended to Mr. B. Mascn of the Prance Stone Company and Mr. R. Annesser of the National lime and Stone Company without whose cooperation and assistance this study would have been impossible. I also acknowledge financial support provided by the Friends of Ortcr.
  • 65Th Annual Tri-State Geological Field Conference 2-3 October 2004

    65Th Annual Tri-State Geological Field Conference 2-3 October 2004

    65th Annual Tri-State Geological Field Conference 2-3 October 2004 Weis Earth Science Museum Menasha, Wisconsin The Lake & The Ledge Geological Links between the Niagara Escarpment and Lake Winnebago Joanne Kluessendorf & Donald G. Mikulic Organizers The Lake & The Ledge Geological Links between the Niagara Escarpment and Lake Winnebago 65th Annual Tri-State Geological Field Conference 2-3 October 2004 by Joanne Kluessendorf Weis Earth Science Museum, Menasha and Donald G. Mikulic Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign With contributions by Bruce Brown, Wisconsin Geological & Natural History Survey, Stop 1 Tom Hooyer, Wisconsin Geological & Natural History Survey, Stops 2 & 5 William Mode, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh, Stops 2 & 5 Maureen Muldoon, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh, Stop 1 Weis Earth Science Museum University of Wisconsin-Fox Valley Menasha, Wisconsin WELCOME TO THE TH 65 ANNUAL TRI-STATE GEOLOGICAL FIELD CONFERENCE. The Tri-State Geological Field Conference was founded in 1933 as an informal geological field trip for professionals and students in Iowa, Illinois and Wisconsin. The first Tri-State examined the LaSalle Anticline in Illinois. Fifty-two geologists from the University of Chicago, University of Iowa, University of Illinois, Northwestern University, University of Wisconsin, Northern Illinois State Teachers College, Western Illinois Teachers College, and the Illinois State Geological Survey attended that trip (Anderson, 1980). The 1934 field conference was hosted by the University of Wisconsin and the 1935 by the University of Iowa, establishing the rotation between the three states. The 1947 Tri-State visited quarries at Hamilton Mound and High Cliff, two of the stops on this year’s field trip.
  • Detroit River Group in the Michigan Basin

    Detroit River Group in the Michigan Basin

    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 133 September 1951 DETROIT RIVER GROUP IN THE MICHIGAN BASIN By Kenneth K. Landes UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Washington, D. C. Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Introduction............................ ^ Amherstburg formation................. 7 Nomenclature of the Detroit River Structural geology...................... 14 group................................ i Geologic history ....................... ^4 Detroit River group..................... 3 Economic geology...................... 19 Lucas formation....................... 3 Reference cited........................ 21 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Location of wells and cross sections used in the study .......................... ii 2. Correlation chart . ..................................... 2 3. Cross sections A-«kf to 3-G1 inclusive . ......................;.............. 4 4. Facies map of basal part of Dundee formation. ................................. 5 5. Aggregate thickness of salt beds in the Lucas formation. ........................ 8 6. Thickness map of Lucas formation. ........................................... 10 7. Thickness map of Amherstburg formation (including Sylvania sandstone member. 11 8. Lime stone/dolomite facies map of Amherstburg formation ...................... 13 9. Thickness of Sylvania sandstone member of Amherstburg formation.............. 15 10. Boundary of the Bois Blanc formation in southwestern Michigan.
  • 1 Supplementary Materials and Methods 1 S1 Expanded

    1 Supplementary Materials and Methods 1 S1 Expanded

    1 Supplementary Materials and Methods 2 S1 Expanded Geologic and Paleogeographic Information 3 The carbonate nodules from Montañez et al., (2007) utilized in this study were collected from well-developed and 4 drained paleosols from: 1) the Eastern Shelf of the Midland Basin (N.C. Texas), 2) Paradox Basin (S.E. Utah), 3) Pedregosa 5 Basin (S.C. New Mexico), 4) Anadarko Basin (S.C. Oklahoma), and 5) the Grand Canyon Embayment (N.C. Arizona) (Fig. 6 1a; Richey et al., (2020)). The plant cuticle fossils come from localities in: 1) N.C. Texas (Lower Pease River [LPR], Lake 7 Kemp Dam [LKD], Parkey’s Oil Patch [POP], and Mitchell Creek [MC]; all representing localities that also provided 8 carbonate nodules or plant organic matter [POM] for Montañez et al., (2007), 2) N.C. New Mexico (Kinney Brick Quarry 9 [KB]), 3) S.E. Kansas (Hamilton Quarry [HQ]), 4) S.E. Illinois (Lake Sara Limestone [LSL]), and 5) S.W. Indiana (sub- 10 Minshall [SM]) (Fig. 1a, S2–4; Richey et al., (2020)). These localities span a wide portion of the western equatorial portion 11 of Euramerica during the latest Pennsylvanian through middle Permian (Fig. 1b). 12 13 S2 Biostratigraphic Correlations and Age Model 14 N.C. Texas stratigraphy and the position of pedogenic carbonate samples from Montañez et al., (2007) and cuticle were 15 inferred from N.C. Texas conodont biostratigraphy and its relation to Permian global conodont biostratigraphy (Tabor and 16 Montañez, 2004; Wardlaw, 2005; Henderson, 2018). The specific correlations used are (C. Henderson, personal 17 communication, August 2019): (1) The Stockwether Limestone Member of the Pueblo Formation contains Idiognathodus 18 isolatus, indicating that the Carboniferous-Permian boundary (298.9 Ma) and base of the Asselian resides in the Stockwether 19 Limestone (Wardlaw, 2005).
  • U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 21 Cover

    U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 21 Cover

    rf Predictive Stratigraphic Analysis- - Concept and Application u.s. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 21 Cover. Calcic paleo-Vertisol underlying the resistant transgressive marine limestone Little Stone Gap Member of the Hinton Formation (Upper Mississippian) in southwestern West Virginia. This paleosol is indicative of a relatively dry climate when evapotranspira- tion exceeded rainfall for more than 6 months out of the year. The light-gray color at the level of the photograph scale (center) is the result of gleying (bleaching) after burial. A calcified root system, located in the proximity of the scale, branches downward and sug­ gests a well-developed root system for a plant whose stem may have been up to 15 centi­ meters in diameter. Numerous mineralized fossil roots at this level indicate that land plants were very well adapted to seasonally dry conditions in nonwaterlogged environ­ ments by Late Mississippian time. Cross-cutting fractures, known as mukkara structures and caused by seasonal expansion (wet) and contraction (dry), are visible throughout the outcrop beneath the resistant limestone layer except where interrupted or destroyed by paleoroot systems. Predictive Stratigraphic Analysis Concept and Application Edited by C. Blaine Cecil and N. Terence Edgar U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2110 A collection of extended abstracts of papers presented at two workshops on the title subject UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GORDON P. EATON, Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
  • Silurian Rocks in the Subsurface of Northwestern Ohio

    Silurian Rocks in the Subsurface of Northwestern Ohio

    STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Coli ins, Chief LIBRARJ BUREAU OF GEOLOGY TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA Report of Investigations No. 100 SILURIAN ROCKS IN THE SUBSURFACE OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO by Adriaan Janssens Columbus 1977 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF 8DNRDEPARTMENT OF OF THE NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADMINISTRATION Horace R. Collins, MS, State Geologist and Division Chief Richard A. Struble, PhD, Geologist and Assistant Chief William J. Buschman, Jr., BS, Administrative Geologist Barbara J. Adams, Office Manager REGIONAL GEOLOGY SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY Robert G. Van Horn, MS, Geologist and Section Head Adriaan Janssens, PhD, Geologist and Section Head Richard W. Carlton, PhD, Geologist Charles R. Grapes II, BS, Geologist Michael L. Couchot, MS, Geologist Frank L. Majchszak, MS, Geologist Douglas L. Crowell, MS, Geologist James Wooten, Geology Technician Richard M. DeLong, MS, Geologist Garry E. Yates, Geology Technician Michael C. Hansen, MS, Geologist Linda C. Gearheart, Clerk Dennis N. Hull, MS, Geologist Brenda L. Rinderle, Office Machine Operator Michele L. Risser, BA , Geologist Joel D. Vormelker, MS, Geologist LAKE ERIE GEOCHEMISTRY LABORATORY Charles H. Carter, PhD, Geologist and Section Head D. Joe Benson, PhD, Geologist David A. Stith, MS, Geologist and Section Head Donald E. Guy, Jr., BA, Geologist George Botoman, MS, Geologist Dale L. Liebenthal, Boat Captain Norman F. Knapp, PhD, Chemist Thomas J. Feldkamp, BS, Geology Technician E. Lorraine Thomas, Laboratory Technician Marjorie L. VanVooren, Typist TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS Jean Simmons Brown, MS, Geologist/Editor and Section Head Cartography Philip J. Celnar, BFA, Cartography Supervisor R. Anne Berry, BFA, Cartographer James A. Brown, Cartographer Donald R.