DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Wastewater Challenges - Pt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global Wastewater Challenges - Pt GLOBAL WASTEWATER CHALLENGES - PT. 3 Global Wastewater Challenges Place wastewater treatment station, which means only pre- Pressure on Aging Infrastructure screened sewage has to be pumped? Pumps & Systems January 2016 Part 3 of 6 Shifting trends in water use and a changing sewage composition cause complex problems for the world’s sewer systems. Figures 1 (left) and 2 (right). Two general designs of By Horst Sturm (KSB) a submersible pumping station (Images and graphics courtesy of KSB) Third of Six Parts The content and mix of the pumped fluid matters greatly. Often, “sewage” is the only information When a system is not working as expected, users and application engineers receive when asked to specify engineers must see the complete picture, especially in pumps. But providing a detailed definition of the wastewater transport systems. While the increasing particular fluid (i.e. unscreened raw sewage, pre- use of wipes is a challenge, as discussed in Parts 1 screened sewage, stormwater, sludge) is vital for and 2 of this series (Pumps & Systems, November selecting the hydraulic/impeller. Especially in raw and December 2015), different systems will handle sewage, increased wipe use compounds the challenge this problem differently, and different fluid content for pump selection, system engineering and operation. will influence performance. Wastewater is not all the same. Depending on the operation or the system’s This article will exclude pre-screened wastewater and design, the sensitivity can vary for the particular kind focus on the transport of raw sewage to treatment of wastewater. plants. Several international initiatives attempt to clarify and Pump Station Designs define different wastewater. Engineering and planning The first design aspect to consider is the pump sump of wastewater facilities requires knowing what kind and the intake’s design. Even if the sewer needs a of wastewater or sewage must be pumped for trouble- particular velocity to ensure that all solids can pass, free performance and energy efficiency. the flow should not be too fast and too hard to create vortex. The inlet can carry a lot of air if it jumps Types of Stations in from a higher head. Engineers must consider There are three general types of wastewater pumping these factors. For combined pumping stations that stations, depending on pump types used: conventional have to pump stormwater and wastewater, a good dry pit pumping stations, submersible pumping compromise between minimum velocity to transport stations and submersible pumping stations in dry pit all the content and maximum velocity to avoid vortex installation. The type that works best depends heavily and entrained air has to be found. If the station only on the wastewater pumped. Is it a transport station pumps raw sewage, the main risk is a slow flow can for raw sewage only? Is it a station for stormwater cause solids to settle. These stations often run only (including surface water)? Is it a combined station minutes per day and mostly with low flow. for sewage and stormwater? Or is it inside in a CONQUER THE CLOG 1 GLOBAL WASTEWATER CHALLENGES - PT. 3 Figure 1 is an example of a stormwater station that has other requirements as a raw sewage station. Even if the stormwater station can handle different solid loads, the operating velocity will be mostly high and it will be flushed during operation. The flow will be much higher and more powerful depending on the particular storm event. Most of these stations will hold back larger material of the heavy loads by a screen before it comes to the pumping stations. The high flow will flush solids and wipes, but high flows can create vortex in the sump and cause unbalanced inflow into the pump’s suction. These stations also face higher risk of air drawn into the sump and pump suction. For this reason, the inflow to the sump should not be too high or too close to the pumps. Also, having the inflow below the max water level is a good idea, but engineers must ensure that no Figure 3. Example of a large combined stormwater backflow can occur. and sewage station If the intake level is higher than 1 to 1.5 meters (3.3 to For a combination of stormwater and sewage 5 feet), a dissipation chamber or “balcony” in front of pumping station, engineers must consider aspects the intake to the sump is recommended. This feature of both (see Figure 3 and Image 1). Even if a can contribute to a smaller floor footprint. 1 pumping station is flushed in a storm event, the sewage’s settling solids can pose problems. Another A dissipation balcony breaks the flow’s power to disadvantage arises if the same pump size handles dry- prevent unnecessary vortex and helps to remove air weather flows and high flows during storms. before it enters the pumps. The fillet to the opposite wall should have a slope of approximately 10 degrees. Figure 2 shows a raw sewage pumping station sump. The footprint of the bottom level is much smaller, and the sump, wall and fillets are designed to guide the fluid with the solids and wipes to the suction area. Any area of dead zone would pose a risk of materials settling. The fillets to the wall should have a slope of 45 degrees or up to 60 degrees for heavy cases. A sump designed for raw sewage pumping stations with a larger footprint can cause problems. A growing volume of settling substances may eventually cover the pumps because they do not run often (sometimes just 15 minutes per day), and the raw sewage is thick and Image 1. Example of a combined station dries quickly. If more volume for storage is needed, it is better to use it from the vertical space. For these cases, a jockey pump is often selected. Even if this pump is available, it may seem better to use 2 CONQUER THE CLOG GLOBAL WASTEWATER CHALLENGES - PT. 3 variable frequency drives (VFDs) for speed reduction level down as much as possible. An additional small of the larger pumps for dry-weather flow, but this emptying pump may be helpful. A small mixer in causes trouble because of low velocity. the sump can help to create turbulences and mix the floating sludge with the other pumped medium before Even if a pump can handle the mixture’s fluidity pumping. portion, the pump’s tip speed and the pipe’s velocity may not be sufficient to properly transport solids Inflow to the Sump and rags. The pump should operate in the Hydraulic Institute’s recommended Preferred Operating Range. When possible, the inflow should be below the water level. Often, backflow must be prevented or other Combined stations must be able to pump very high geodetic conditions prevent the inflow from being that flows during certain events as well as low flows that deep. If the inflow is above the water level, the water can carry a lot of solids and wipes during dry weather. jumps into the sump and air can be entrained. Submersible Pumping Stations For high flows, the available energy in the flow can cause turbulences on any obstruction or the opposite Sump volume is calculated according to the necessary wall. A baffle wall or a dissipation chamber can storage volume of fluid, which is related to the prevent these effects. They can remove air before it maximum switching frequency. However, dead zones reaches the pumps, reduce the flow’s energy and share and zones that can cause vortex or swirls should be the total flow between pumps in parallel operation. avoided. It is recommended to have fillets with a slope A dissipation chamber or “balcony” may be needed of approximately 45 degrees, but 60 degrees may be in cases with an inflow level more than 3.2 feet above better for heavy loads. The circular sump is typically the water level.1 preferred, but rectangular sumps are possible. Normally, inflow velocity into the sump cannot Between submersible pumps, splitters are be defined in a tight limit, but a proven value is an recommended. They are relatively inexpensive and average of 3.3 feet per second. minimize the influence of the flow from the pumps sitting next to each other. Also below the suction of Pipe Work the pump, a splitter can improve the hydraulic flow into the pump and prevent unbalanced load. Because wastewater can change in content and flow over time and different stations handle different Proper design and shape of the sump on the pump’s wastewater without detailed definition, optimum backside helps to establish good flow and hydraulic velocity for wastewater cannot be mathematically conditions in the sump to improve the transport of defined. solids. For heavy cases and large sumps, a small mixer may be used. Before the pumps start, the mixer can However, global wastewater transport experience bring everything into suspension and help handle the provides recommended values. Some tolerances are load in a more homogenized condition. Compared possible depending on load. Especially in the case of with a valve on a discharge pipe or on a pump with VFD operation, engineers and end users must consider the same purpose, a mixer is more flexible and minimum velocities. Many breakdowns could be powerful to flush the sump. A valve is pointed in one avoided with this consideration. direction only and can clog. For trouble-free operation, dimensioning and For stations that have floating sludge on top of the positioning of pipes and valves play an important role sump level, it is important not to have a constant (see Image 2 [page 76] and Figures 4 and 5).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Packaged Pump Stations Xylem’S Market Leading Products Will Save You Time and Money
    Flygt N-technology parts and upgrade kits CLOG-FREE PUMPING. MINIMIZED ENERGY COSTS. • Self-cleaning impeller • Cutting groove provides seal protection • Well-balanced and modular design • High energy efficiency • Resistant materials • Adaptive N-hydraulics • Upgrade kits • Tight tolerances Packaged Pump Stations Xylem’s market leading products will save you time and money Service centres Australia New Zealand Adelaide: Karratha: Leewood: Auckland (head office): 22 Starr Avenue, Lot 4605 Croydon Road, 48 Leewood Drive, Orange 9 Tawa Drive, Albany, North Plympton, SA 5037 Karratha Industrial Estate, NSW 2800 Auckland 0632 Ph +61 8 8350 7100 Karratha WA 6714 Ph +61 2 9832 6730 Ph +64 9 415 8687 Fax +61 8 8350 7111 Ph +61 8 9183 8246 Fax +61 2 9832 6731 Fax +64 9 415 8679 Fax +61 8 9183 8248 Brisbane: Perth: Christchurch: Unit 1/39-45 Aquarium Ave Mackay: 76 Tarlton Crescent, Unit 6, 4 O’Briens Rd, Hemmant QLD 4174 7 Merchant Street, Paget, Perth Airport, WA 6105 Sockburn, Christchurch 8042 PO Box 2331 Mackay QLD 4740 Ph +61 8 9475 1900 Ph +64 3 348 4612 Mansfield QLD 4122 Ph +61 7 4842 9200 Fax +61 8 9475 1999 Fax +64 3 348 4629 Ph +61 7 3908 4000 Fax +61 7 4842 9299 Fax +61 7 3908 4199 Sydney (head office): Wellington: Melbourne: Unit 2, 2 Capicure Drive, c/9 Tawa Drive, Albany North Darwin: Unit 3, 1 Federation Way, Eastern Creek NSW 2766 Harbour, Auckland 29 McCourt Road, Chifley Business Park, Ph +61 2 9832 6200 Ph +64 021 746 441 Yarrawonga, NT 0830 Mentone VIC 3194 Fax +61 2 9832 6480 Fax +64 802 4432 Ph +61 8 8947 8300 Ph +61 3 8551
    [Show full text]
  • Sewer Overflow Response Plan
    DAPHNE UTILITIES SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOW RESPONSE PLAN RECORD OF PLAN REVISIONS REVISION SECTIONS INITIALS REMARKS DATE REVISED 12/15/18 All Draft Plan Created 03/15/19 All Original Plan Published Table of Contents I. Purpose ..................................................................................................................................... 1 II. General ....................................................................................................................................... 1 III. Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 1 IV. System Information .................................................................................................................... 1 V. SSO and Surface Water Assessment .......................................................................................... 2 VI. Sanitary Sewer Overflow Response Procedures ........................................................................ 2 A. Notification of Possible SSO ........................................................................................ 3 B. Dispatch of Appropriate Crews to Site of Sewer Overflow.......................................... 3 C. Overflow Correction, Containment, and Clean Up ...................................................... 4 1. Responsibilities of Response Crew upon Arrival............................................... 4 2. Initial Measures for Containment......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of Submersible Sewage Pumping Stations
    STS402 Hunter Water Corporation A.B.N. 46 228 513 446 Standard Technical Specification for: CONSTRUCTION OF SUBMERSIBLE SEWAGE PUMPING STATIONS This Standard Technical Specification was developed by Hunter Water to be used for the construction and/or maintenance of water and/or sewerage works that are, or are to become, the property of Hunter Water. It is intended that this Standard Technical Specification be used in conjunction with various other standard and project specific drawings and design requirements as defined by Hunter Water for each particular project. Hunter Water does not consider this Standard Technical Specification suitable for use for any other purpose or in any other manner. Use of this Standard Technical Specification for any other purpose or in any other manner is wholly at the user's risk. Hunter Water makes no representations or warranty that this Standard Technical Specification has been prepared with reasonable care and does not assume a duty of care to any person using this document for any purpose other than stated. In the case of this document having been downloaded from Hunter Water's website; - Hunter Water has no responsibility to inform you of any matter relating to the accuracy of this Standard Technical Specification which is known to Hunter Water at the time of downloading or subsequently comes to the attention of Hunter Water. - This document is current at the date of downloading. Hunter Water may update this document at any time. Copyright in this document belongs to Hunter Water Corporation. Hunter Water Corporation A.B.N. 46 228 513 446 CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanitary Sewer & Pumping Station Manual
    SANITARY SEWER AND PUMPING STATION MANUAL FOR SPRINGFIELD WATER AND SEWER COMMISSION Last Revised: _July 20, 2017______________ Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Section Number General 1 Drawing Requirements 2 Construction Procedures 3 Flow Determination 4 Computer Modeling 5 Sanitary Sewers 6 Pump Stations 7 Appendices A – Checklist B – Construction Specifications C – Standard Drawings Page 2 SECTION 1 – GENERAL 1.1 General................................................................ 4 1.2 Purpose................................................................ 4 1.3 Structure of the Manual................................................ 4 1.4 Definitions............................................................ 4 1.5 References............................................................. 9 Page 3 1.1 General The Sanitary Sewer and Pumping Station Manual is for the design and construction of infrastructure. The specific subjects of these manuals are: • Procedures Manual for Infrastructure Development • Sanitary Sewer and Pumping Station • Structures • Geotechnical • Construction Inspection 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this manual is to provide information regarding design and construction requirements for sanitary sewers, pumping stations, and force mains in Springfield, Kentucky. The goal is to provide uniform design and construction standards. The end result will be public infrastructure that is cost effective and maintainable by the Springfield Water and Sewer Commission (SWSC)in the long term. 1.3 Structure of the Manual The manual
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Concrete Corrosion of Manhole Located Near Source of Odorous Emission
    ARCHITECTURE CIVIL ENGINEERING E NVIRONMENT The Silesian University of Technology No. 4/2018 doi : 10.21307/ACEE-2018-057 ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE CORROSION OF MANHOLE LOCATED NEAR SOURCE OF ODOROUS EMISSION Bożena GIL a, Barbara SŁOMKA-SŁUPIK b*, Katarzyna KOWALSKA c, Karol JASIŃSKI d a PhD; Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Energy, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland b PhD; Faculty of Civil Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 5, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland *E-mail address: [email protected] c PhD; Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Energy, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland d MSc; Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Energy, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland Received: 13.02.2018; Revised: 27.04.2018; Accepted: 22.05.2018 Abstract The problem of corrosion of sanitary sewer concrete concerns the elements located just behind the expansion well. Evolving odorogenic substances and bioaerosols spread in the sewage system, cause in adverse conditions both chemical and biolog - ical corrosion of concrete. The paper presents the results of tests of samples taken from the top concrete circle and from a corroded cast iron hatch of 7 years old manhole located below the expansion well. Well elements were subjected to a strong interaction of hydrogen sulphide, which average concentration in the sewage air, during an exemplary 84 hours was 29 ppm. Concrete was gelatinous fine with noticeable outer pellicular layer of 1 mm thick and the inner layer containing aggregates (grain < 1 cm). Sulfur oxidizing, sulfates reducing, Fe 2+ oxidizing bacteria, aerobic heterotrophs, anaerobic heterotrophs, nitrifiers and denitrifiers were determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Pressurised Dewatering: the Economical Solution for Wastewater
    Sewage Spotlight PPressurisedressurised ddewatering:ewatering: tthehe eeconomicalconomical ssolutionolution fforor wwastewaterastewater ddisposalisposal pproblemsroblems Jim Rossiter MIEI, C.Eng., Technical Support Manager at Sulzer Pumps Solutions Ireland Ltd. Pressurised dewatering is typically suitable for sewer systems in outlying areas with no direct access to local gravity sewer lines, such as holiday areas and coastal regions, and will solve ground water pollution problems by utilising current pumping technology combined with modern European trends in sewage removal. Jim Rossiter of Sulzer Pumps Solutions, Ireland Ltd., explains the advantages and effectiveness of this kind of technology. By Jim Rossiter Pressurised dewatering is a very eff ective solution business is collected in small underground grinder for removing wastewater in diffi cult terrain where pump stations. Stations serving single residential units topographical conditions make it diffi cult to lay gravity typically utilize plastic sumps of some 700mm to 1.2m pipes. Recent EU regulations have severely limited the in diameter. usage of septic tanks and the usage of mini-treatment systems has also become more restricted. The pressurized dewatering method of sewage removal has proved very popular in many European countries in the light of the EU directive 91/271/EEC and the European water framework directive. 100% of domestic dwellings in Holland, a good example of very fl at terrain, have been connected to a central sewage system, and the vast majority are connected via pressurized lines. The grinder pump system Pressure or grinder pump systems utilize a small grinder pump station at each wastewater or sewage source. Small-diameter low pressure sewer lines are used for transmission of the sewage.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3 - Design Standards for Sewage Pumping Stations and Force Mains
    SECTION 3 - DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SEWAGE PUMPING STATIONS AND FORCE MAINS 3.1. General Requirements. 3.1.01 The design of sewage pumping stations and force mains is an engineering matter and is not subject to detailed recommendations or requirements other than as required by these Standards. 3.1.02 Sewage pumping stations and force mains are to be provided solely for the conveyance of sanitary wastes. Under no circumstances shall any roof, foundation, surface or sub-surface drainage, or any other form of storm drainage be allowed to pass through the proposed facilities. 3.1.03 A detailed engineering report shall be submitted to and approved by the County prior to design. The report shall fully comply with all requirements of Paragraph 1.1.02A; shall evaluate the proposed sanitary sewer service area; shall evaluate overall effect downstream County facilities and shall justify the proposed station peaking factor. 3.1.04 The design must conform to the minimum standards set forth in the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Sewerage Regulations. County requirements for specific equipment and submittals will be detailed during engineering review. 3.1.05 An Operations and Maintenance (O & M) Manual shall be prepared in accordance with the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Sewerage Regulations and approved by the State and County before the County will accept the station for operation and maintenance. The manual shall contain complete operating information for all equipment, a complete set of approved shop drawings and a copy of the as-built plans for the station. The as-built plans shall be updated to include all plan revisions and field changes made during bidding and construction.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 SEWAGE PUMPING STATIONS Design Specifications
    Design Specifications & Requirements Manual 4 SEWAGE PUMPING STATIONS 4.1 DEFINITION AND PURPOSE ...................................................................................... 1 4.2 PERMITTED USES ..................................................................................................... 1 4.3 DESIGN CRITERIA ..................................................................................................... 1 4.3.1 General ........................................................................................................ 1 4.3.2 Site Layout and Servicing ............................................................................ 2 4.3.3 Structural ..................................................................................................... 3 4.3.4 Flow Capacity .............................................................................................. 3 4.3.5 Pumps ......................................................................................................... 4 4.3.6 Channels ..................................................................................................... 5 4.3.7 Pump Controls ............................................................................................. 5 4.3.8 Valves and Fittings ...................................................................................... 5 4.3.9 Flow Measurement ...................................................................................... 6 4.3.10 Wet Wells ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sanitary Sewer and Water DESIGN STANDARDS
    MARION • HOWELL • OCEOLA • GENOA - SEWER AND WATER AUTHORITY GENOA • OCEOLA - SEWER AND WATER AUTHORITY Sanitary Sewer and Water DESIGN STANDARDS April 2015 NOTE TO USER: The following design standards apply to water improvements in Marion, Howell, Oceola and Genoa Townships. The sanitary sewer design standards only apply to improvements in Genoa and Oceola Townships. CONTENTS PART I – DESIGN STANDARDS 1.0 WATER MAINS ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.01 Water Distribution System Basis of Design ........................................................................... 1 1.02 Water Main Layout ................................................................................................................. 2 1.03 Depth of Water Main .............................................................................................................. 4 1.04 Joint Restraint ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.05 Meters ...................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 SANITARY SEWERS .................................................................................................................. 5 2.01 Sanitary Sewer Basis of Design .............................................................................................. 5 2.02 Sewer Location.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Developer's Manual 2020 Update the Developer's Manual Is a Guide To
    Developer’s Manual 2020 Update The Developer’s Manual is a guide to obtain water and sewer service for all property owners with existing or planned developments in the City of Pittsburgh and Millvale (water system only). This document has existed for 15+ years and as a result, has seen many revisions. These revisions over time have led to inconsistencies and the document is not customer friendly. To create a document that is more customer focused, PWSA staff undertook an extensive review that resulted in a deep dive into why we do things the way we do. From June to August of 2019, the Developer’s Manual Working Group reviewed and revised every section of our existing Manual. The Working Group consisted of six engineers, an engineering technician, and a member of the Public Affairs team. The group brought in many different perspectives and levels of expertise to develop a manual that not only clearly states our policies and procedures but that will be helpful to our customers and staff. This draft has been vetted internally and has was also circulated for feedback to several stakeholder groups including the Commercial Real Estate Development Association (NAIOP), Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA), and external engineering firms that regularly work on development projects. The updated Developer’s Manual will make future updates and policy approvals easier and creates procedures and processes that will ensure PWSA is a good steward of our water by reducing CSOs and more closely tracking the impact of developments on our most restricted sewers. Some of the most noteworthy changes to the existing manual include: General 1.
    [Show full text]
  • What Effect Does Rehabilitation of Wastewater Pipelines Have on the Share of Infiltration and Inflow Water (I/I-Water)?
    water Article What Effect Does Rehabilitation of Wastewater Pipelines Have on the Share of Infiltration and Inflow Water (I/I-Water)? Kristin Jenssen Sola 1,2,*, Jarle Tommy Bjerkholt 1,3, Oddvar Georg Lindholm 1 and Harsha Ratnaweera 1 1 Faculty of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1430 Ås, Norway; [email protected] (J.T.B.); [email protected] (O.G.L.); [email protected] (H.R.) 2 The Municipality of Asker, 1372 Asker, Norway 3 Faculty of Technology, Natural Sciences and Maritime Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, 3603 Kongsberg, Norway * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-41632184 Abstract: Infiltration and inflow water (I/I-water) is a big challenge in sewage systems in many countries. I/I-water above an acceptable level indicates that the sewage system is not functioning properly. I/I-water leads to increased pumping costs and increased sewage overflow, leading to increased pollution of the receiving waters. Many rehabilitation projects are driven by the need to reduce the share of I/I-water and common measures are to replace pipes and manholes. The share of I/I-water is predominantly driven by rainfall. This makes it difficult to document the efficiency of mitigating measures. One way to address this issue is to compare data from rehabilitation areas to areas where no measures have been implemented. Three rehabilitation areas in Asker Municipality, Norway, were successfully assessed by applying this approach. Asker has a 100% separate system. The strategy to reduce I/I-water in Asker Municipality was to rehabilitate sewage mains, either by full replacement or lining the old pipes, and replacement of manholes.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulfide and Methane Production in Anaerobic Sewer Pipes: from Microbial Community Characterization to Effective Mitigation Strategies
    SULFIDE AND METHANE PRODUCTION IN ANAEROBIC SEWER PIPES: FROM MICROBIAL COMMUNITY CHARACTERIZATION TO EFFECTIVE MITIGATION STRATEGIES Olga Auguet Horta Per citar o enllaçar aquest document: Para citar o enlazar este documento: Use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/10803/394074 ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs. ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis doctoral y su utilización debe respetar los derechos de la persona autora. Puede ser utilizada para consulta o estudio personal, así como en actividades o materiales de investigación y docencia en los términos establecidos en el art.
    [Show full text]