DOCSLIB.ORG

Longest Bridges in the World

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Main Span Length SNo Name metres Completed Traffic Country metres (feet) (feet) Danyang–Kunshan Grand Bridge Beijing–Shanghai High-Speed Railway 164,800 m 80 m High-speed 1 2010 China Guinness: Longest bridge (any type), (540,700 ft) (260 ft) rail 2011 Tianjin Grand Bridge Beijing–Shanghai High-Speed Railway 113,700 m High-speed 2 (Viaduct) 2010 China Guinness: Second longest bridge (any (373,000 ft) rail type), 2011 Weinan Weihe Grand Bridge 79,732 m 80 m High-speed 3 2008 China Zhengzhou–Xi'an High-Speed Railway (261,588 ft) (260 ft) rail Bang Na Expressway 54,000 m 2000 4 (Viaduct) Road Thailand Guinness: Longest Road Bridge, 2000 (177,000 ft) (open) Beijing Grand Bridge 48,153 m 108 m High-speed 5 2010 China Beijing–Shanghai High-Speed Railway (157,982 ft) (354 ft) rail Lake Pontchartrain Causeway 38,442 m 46 m 1956 (SB) 6 Guinness: Longest bridge over water Road United States (126,122 ft) (151 ft) 1969 (NB) (continuous), 1969 Manchac Swamp bridge 36,710 m 7 N/A 1970 Road United States Longest toll-free road bridge (120,440 ft) Yangcun Bridge 35,812 m High-speed 8 (Viaduct) 2007 China Beijing-Tianjin Intercity Railway (117,493 ft) rail 35,673 m 448 m 9 Hangzhou Bay Bridge 2007 Road China (117,037 ft) (1,470 ft) 35,660 m 1,490 m 10 Runyang Bridge 2005 Road China (116,990 ft) (4,890 ft) 32,500 m 400 m 11 Donghai Bridge 2005 Road China (106,600 ft) (1,300 ft) 29,908 m 12 Shanghai Maglev line (Viaduct) 2003 Maglev China (98,123 ft) 29,290 m 13 Atchafalaya Basin Bridge (Viaduct) 1973 Highway United States (96,100 ft) 29,000 m 14 Louisiana Highway 1 Bridge (Viaduct) 2011 Highway United States (95,000 ft) Line 1, Wuhan Metro Bridge 28,870 m 15 0? 2009 Metro China Wuhan Metro (94,720 ft) Yanshi Bridge 28,543 m High-speed 16 0? 2009 China Zhengzhou–Xi'an High-Speed Railway (93,645 ft) rail Jiaozhou Bay Bridge 26,707 m 260 m 17 Guinness: Longest bridge over water 2011 Road China (87,621 ft) (850 ft) (aggregate), July 2011 26,540 m 18 Jintang Bridge (Viaduct) 2009 Road China (87,070 ft) Jinbin Light Rail No. 1 Bridge 25,800 m 19 (Guanghualu – Babaocun) (Viaduct) 2003 Metro China (84,600 ft) Tianjin Binhai Mass Transit Saudi Arabia 25,000 m 20 King Fahd Causeway Bridge I (Viaduct) 1986 Road and (82,000 ft) Bahrain 24,500 m 21 Suvarnabhumi Airport Link 0? 2010 Rail Thailand (80,400 ft) Sultan Abdul Halim Muadzam Shah 24,000 m 240 m 22 Bridge 2014 Highway Malaysia (79,000 ft) (790 ft) Penang Second Bridge Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel (in 24,140 m 1964 (NB) 23 0? Highway United States Virginia) (79,200 ft) 1999 (SB) Liangshui River Bridge 21,563 m High-speed 24 (Viaduct) 2007 China Beijing-Tianjin Intercity Railway (70,745 ft) rail Yongding New River Bridge 21,133 m High-speed 25 0? 2007 China Beijing-Tianjin Intercity Railway (69,334 ft) rail 20,500 m 26 6th October Bridge (Viaduct) 1996 Road Egypt (67,300 ft) C215 Viaduct 20,000 m High-speed 27 (Viaduct) 2007 Taiwan Taiwan High Speed Rail (66,000 ft) rail 18,384 m 800 m 28 Incheon Bridge 2009 Road South Korea (60,315 ft) (2,600 ft) Cangzhou–Dezhou Grand Bridge 18,200 m 128 m High-speed 29 2010 China Beijing–Shanghai High-Speed Railway (59,700 ft) (420 ft) rail Aérotrain Test Track 18,000 m Rail 30 0? 1965 France No longer in use (59,000 ft) (prototype) 17,702 m 31 Bonnet Carré Spillway Bridge of I-10 0? 1960s Road United States (58,077 ft) Vasco da Gama Bridge 17,185 m 450 m 32 1998 Highway Portugal Longest bridge in Europe (56,381 ft) (1,480 ft) Saigon - Trung Luong Skyway 16,000 m 33 (Viaduct) 2010 Road Vietnam North-South Expressway, Vietnam (52,000 ft) Cross Beijing Ring Roads Bridge 15,595 m High-speed 34 (Viaduct) 2007 China Beijing-Tianjin Intercity Railway (51,165 ft) rail 13,967 m 35 Kama Bridge (Viaduct) 2002 Road Russia (45,823 ft) 13,500 m 225 m 36 Penang Bridge 1985 Highway Malaysia (44,300 ft) (738 ft) Kam Sheung Road-Tuen Mun viaduct 13,400 m 37 (Viaduct) 2003 Rail Hong Kong (part of West Rail Line) (44,000 ft) Rio-Niterói Bridge 13,290 m 300 m 38 1974 Road Brazil Longest bridge in Latin America (43,600 ft) (980 ft) 13,000 m 398 m 39 Bhumibol Bridge 2006 Road Thailand (43,000 ft) (1,306 ft) 12,980 m 220 m Road & Light 40 President Bridge 2009 Russia (42,590 ft) (720 ft) metro 250 m Confederation Bridge 12,900 m 41 (820 ft) 1997 Highway Canada longest bridge over ice (winter) (42,300 ft) (43x) 12,875 m 42 Jubilee Parkway 0? 1978 Highway United States (42,241 ft) 12,760 m 157 m 43 Novyi Saratovskiy Bridge 2000 Road Russia (41,860 ft) (515 ft) 12,600 m 44 Rudong Yangkou Yellow Sea Bridge 0? 2008 Road China (41,300 ft) 12,700 m 45 Bali Mandara Toll Road 2013 Road Indonesia (41,700 ft) 12,000 m 46 Emsland test facility (Viaduct) 1985 Maglev Germany (39,000 ft) Nanjing Qinhuai River Bridge 12,000 m High-speed 47 0? 2010 China Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway (39,000 ft) rail Qingshuihe Bridge 11,700 m 48 (Viaduct) 2006 Rail China Qingzang Railway (38,400 ft) 11,670 m 133 m 49 Lezíria Bridge 2007 Highway Portugal (38,290 ft) (436 ft) P.V. Narasimha Rao Elevated 11,600 m 50 0? 2009 Highway India Expressway (38,100 ft) 11,265 m 229 m 51 San Mateo-Hayward Bridge 1967 Highway United States (36,959 ft) (751 ft) Third Orinoco crossing (Mercosur 11,100 m 52 0? 2011 ? Venezuela Bridge) (36,400 ft) Zhenjiang Beijing–Hangzhou Canal 11,000 m High-speed 53 Bridge 0? 2010 China (36,000 ft) rail Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway 10,887 m 41 m 54 Seven Mile Bridge 1982 Highway United States (35,719 ft) (135 ft) 6,598 m 366 m 55 Sunshine Skyway Bridge 1987 Highway United States (21,647 ft) (1,201 ft) 10,500 m 56 Third Mainland Bridge (Viaduct) 1991 Road Nigeria (34,400 ft) 10,282 m 57 Shandong-Henan Yellow River Bridge 0? 1985 ? China (33,734 ft) 10,020 m 312 m 58 Wuhu Yangtze River Bridge 2000 Road & Rail China (32,870 ft) (1,024 ft) 9,945 m 59 Hosur Road Elevated Expressway (Viaduct) 2010 Highway India (32,628 ft) 9,970 m 730 m Road (& 60 Shanghai Yangtze River Bridge 2009 China (32,710 ft) (2,400 ft) future Rail) 9,786 m 244 m 61 General W.K. Wilson Jr. Bridge 1980 Highway United States (32,106 ft) (801 ft) Norfolk Southern Lake Pontchartrain 9,300 m 62 0? ? Rail United States Bridge (30,500 ft) Nanjing Dashengguan Yangtze River 9,273 m 336 m High-speed 63 2010 China Bridge (30,423 ft) (1,102 ft) rail & Metro 9,005 m 64 Chacahoula Swamp Bridge 0? 1995 ? United States (29,544 ft) 8,851 m 1962 65 Twin Span Bridge of Interstate 10 (Viaduct) Highway United States (29,039 ft) 2011 8,851 m 317 m 66 Richmond-San Rafael Bridge 1956 Highway United States (29,039 ft) (1,040 ft) 8,678 m 235 m 67 General Rafael Urdaneta Bridge 1962 Road Venezuela (28,471 ft) (771 ft) Virginia Dare Memorial Bridge (in 8,369 m 68 (Viaduct) 2002 Highway United States North Carolina) (27,457 ft) 8,354 m 602 m 69 Yangpu Bridge 1993 Road China (27,408 ft) (1,975 ft) 8,230 m 232 m 70 Xiasha Bridge 1991 ? China (27,000 ft) (761 ft) 8,206 m 1,088 m 71 Sutong Bridge 2008 Road China (26,923 ft) (3,570 ft) 8,038 m 1,158 m 72 Mackinac Bridge 1957 Highway United States (26,371 ft) (3,799 ft) 7,902 m 73 LaBranche Wetlands Bridge 0? 1992 Highway United States (25,925 ft) Denmark 7,845 m 490 m Highway & 74 Öresund Bridge 1999 and (25,738 ft) (1,610 ft) Rail Sweden 7,693 m 75 Maestri Bridge 11 m (36 ft) 1928 Road United States (25,240 ft) 7,675 m 216 m 76 Jiujiang Yangtze River Bridge 1992 Road & Rail China (25,180 ft) (709 ft) 7,425 m 126 m 77 James River Bridge 1983 Highway United States (24,360 ft) (413 ft) 7,420 m 500 m 78 Gwangan Bridge 2002 Road South Korea (24,340 ft) (1,600 ft) 7,414 m 215 m 79 Champlain Bridge (Montreal) 1967 Highway Canada (24,324 ft) (705 ft) 7,310 m 470 m 80 Seohae Bridge 2000 Highway South Korea (23,980 ft) (1,540 ft) 7,110 m 81 Volgograd Bridge (Viaduct) 2009 Road Russia (23,330 ft) 6,946 m 490 m 1952 82 Chesapeake Bay Bridge (in Maryland) Highway United States (22,789 ft) (1,610 ft) 1973 7,000 m Highway & 83 Huey P. Long Bridge (Jefferson Parish) 0? 1936 United States (23,000 ft) Rail 6,790 m 1,624 m 84 Great Belt Bridge (Eastern) 1998 Highway Denmark (22,280 ft) (5,328 ft) 6,772 m 160 m Highway & 85 Nanjing Yangtze River Bridge 1968 China (22,218 ft) (520 ft) Rail 6,761 m 688 m 86 Xiangshan Harbor Bridge 2012 Highway China (22,182 ft) (2,257 ft) 6,611 m 110 m Highway & 87 Great Belt Bridge (Western) 1998 Denmark (21,690 ft) (360 ft) Rail 6,589 m Road, Rail & 88 Thanlwin Bridge (Mawlamyaing) 0? 2005 Myanmar (21,617 ft) pedestrian 6,588 m 366 m 89 St.
Recommended publications
  • A Unique Design of R.C.C. Bridge on Godavari River at Sironcha Dist

    A Unique Design of R.C.C. Bridge on Godavari River at Sironcha Dist

    ICSESD May 2017 IRA-International Journal of Technology & Engineering ISSN 2455-4480 Proceedings of the International Conference on Science & Engineering for Sustainable Development (2017) Pg. no.148-159 Published by: Institute of Research Advances https://research-advances.org/index.php/IRAJTE A Unique Design of R.C.C. Bridge on Godavari River at Sironcha Dist. Gadchiroli - India Ram Vighe Member, Institution of Engineers(India) Type of Review: Originality Check & Peer Review under the responsibility of the Scientific Committee of the Conference and The Institution of Engineers (India). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21013/jte.ICSESD201715 How to cite this paper: Vighe, R. (2017). A Unique Design of R.C.C. Bridge on Godavari River at Sironcha Dist. Gadchiroli -India. Proceedings of the International Conference on Science & Engineering for Sustainable Development (2017), 148-159. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21013/jte.ICSESD201715 © International Conference on Science & Engineering for Sustainable Development & The Institution of Engineers (India). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License subject to proper citation to the publication source of the work. Disclaimer: The conference papers as published by the Institute of Research Advances (IRA) are the views and opinions of their respective authors and are not the views or opinions of the IRA. The IRA disclaims of any harm or loss caused due to the published content to any party. 148 ICSESD- 2017 Proceedings IRA-International Journal of Technology & Engineering ABSTRACT Reinforced concrete bridges may have various systems: Beam (with simply supported or continuous beams), Frame, Arch, or combined of it.
  • Suspension Bridges

    Suspension Bridges

    Types of Bridges What are bridges used for? What bridges have you seen in real life? Where were they? Were they designed for people to walk over? Do you know the name and location of any famous bridges? Did you know that there is more than one type of design for bridges? Let’s take a look at some of them. Suspension Bridges A suspension bridge uses ropes, chains or cables to hold the bridge in place. Vertical cables are spaced out along the bridge to secure the deck area (the part that you walk or drive over to get from one side of the bridge to the other). Suspension bridges can cover large distances. Large pillars at either end of the waterways are connected with cables and the cables are secured, usually to the ground. Due to the variety of materials and the complicated design, suspension bridges are very expensive to build. Suspension Bridges The structure of suspension bridges has changed throughout the years. Jacob’s Creek Bridge in Pennsylvania was built in 1801. It was the first suspension bridge to be built using wrought iron chain suspensions. It was 21 metres long. If one single link in a chain is damaged, it weakens the whole chain which could lead to the collapse of the bridge. For this reason, wire or cable is used in the design of suspension bridges today. Even though engineer James Finlay promised that the bridge would stay standing for 50 years, it was damaged in 1825 and replaced in 1833. Suspension Bridges Akashi Kaiko Bridge, Japan The world’s longest suspension bridge is the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge in Japan.
  • January 22, 2018 (8:35 – 8:40) 3

    January 22, 2018 (8:35 – 8:40) 3

    BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC) MEETING AGENDA February 26, 2018 – 8:30 a.m. 310 Court Street, 1st Floor Conf. Room Clearwater, FL 33756 THE PLANNING COUNCIL AND METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION FOR PINELLAS COUNTY 1. CALL TO ORDER AND INTRODUCTIONS (8:30 – 8:35) 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – January 22, 2018 (8:35 – 8:40) 3. FORWARD PINELLAS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – February 14, 2018 (8:40 – 8:45) 4. SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PRESENTATION (8:45 – 9:00) 5. BEACHTRAN CLEARWATER (9:00 – 9:15) 6. PINELLAS TRAIL TRAIL COUNTER 2017 SUMMARY (9:15 – 9:30) 7. SPOTlight EMPHASIS AREAS UPDATE (9:30 – 9:40) A Vision for U.S. Highway 19 Corridor Gateway Area Master Plan Enhancing Beach Community Access 8. BPAC BUSINESS (9:40 – 9:55) A. Tri-County BPAC Meeting Overview – January 24, 2018 B. Florida Bicycle Association (FBA) C. Pinellas Trails, Inc. 9. AGENCY REPORTS (9:55 – 10:10) 10. OTHER BUSINESS (10:10 – 10:30) A. Membership B. Gulf Coast Safe Street Summit – February 27, 2018 C. Correspondence, Publications, Articles of Interest D. Suggestions for Future Agenda Topics E. Other 11. ADJOURNMENT (10:30) NEXT BPAC MEETING – MARCH 19, 2018 Public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability, or family status. Persons who require special accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act or persons who require translation services (free of charge) should contact the Office of Human Rights, 400 South Fort Harrison Avenue, Suite 300, Clearwater, Florida 33756; [(727) 464-4062 (V/TDD)] at least seven days prior to the meeting.
  • 2006 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Kenneth J

    2006 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Kenneth J

    2006 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Kenneth J. Wright, PE Thomas G. Leech, PE, SE HDR Engineering, Inc. Gannett Fleming, Inc. General Chair Magazine Chair M. Myint Lwin, PE, SE Herbert M. Mandel, PE Federal Highway GAI Consultants, Inc. Administration Technical Program Chair Matthew P. McTish, PE McTish, Kunkel & Associates Al M. Ahmed, PE Exhibits Chair A&A Consultants Inc. Gerald Pitzer, PE Michael J. Alterio GAI Consultants, Inc. Alpha Structures Inc. Gary Runco, PE Carl Angeloff, PE Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Bayer MaterialScience, LLC Seminars Chair Awards Chair Helena Russell Victor E. Bertolina, PE Bridge, design & engineering SAI Consulting Engineers Awards – Vice Chair Budget Chair Louis J. Ruzzi, PE Enrico T. Bruschi, PE Pennsylvania Department DMJM Harris of Transportation Jeffrey J. Campbell, PE Thomas J. Vena, PE Michael Baker, Jr., Inc. Allegheny County Department of Public Works Richard Connors, PE, PMP McCormick Taylor, Inc. Lisle E. Williams, PE, PLS Rules Chair DMJM Harris Attendance & Co-Sponsors James D. Dwyer Chair STV, Inc. Emeritus Committee Gary L. Graham, PE Members Pennsylvania Turnpike Joel Abrams, PhD Commission Consultant Kent A. Harries, PhD, PEng Reidar Bjorhovde, PhD University of Pittsburgh The Bjorhovde Group Student Awards Chair Steven Fenves, PhD Donald W. Herbert, PE NIST Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Arthur W. Hedgren, Jr., PhD, PE Donald Killmeyer, Jr., PE Consultant ms consultants, inc. Tour Chair John F. Graham, Jr., PE Graham Consulting Inc. Eric S. Kline KTA-Tator, Inc. Keynote & Special Interest Session Chair ADVANCING BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY GLOBALLY ○○○○○○ ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ 1 2006 CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE Kenneth J. Wright, PE HDR Engineering, Inc. 2006 IBC General Chairman As this year’s General Chairman, I am pleased to wel- come you to the 2006 International Bridge Conference in Pittsburgh, the “City of Bridges”.
  • County by County Allocations

    County by County Allocations

    COUNTY BY COUNTY ALLOCATIONS Conference Report on House Bill 5001 Fiscal Year 2014-2015 General Appropriations Act Florida House of Representatives Appropriations Committee May 21, 2014 County Allocations Contained in the Conference Report on House Bill 5001 2014-2015 General Appropriations Act This report reflects only items contained in the Conference Report on House Bill 5001, the 2014-2015 General Appropriations Act, that are identifiable to specific counties. State agencies will further allocate other funds contained in the General Appropriations Act based on their own authorized distribution methodologies. This report includes all construction, right of way, or public transportation phases $1 million or greater that are included in the Tentative Work Program for Fiscal Year 2014-2015. The report also contains projects included on certain approved lists associated with specific appropriations where the list may be referenced in proviso but the project is not specifically listed. Examples include, but are not limited to, lists for library, cultural, and historic preservation program grants included in the Department of State and the Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program Small Projects grant list (FRDAP) included in the Department of Environmental Protection. The FEFP and funds distributed to counties by state agencies are not identified in this report. Pages 2 through 63 reflect items that are identifiable to one specific county. Multiple county programs can be found on pages 64 through 67. This report was produced prior
  • [Halshs-00717879, V1] New Port Development and Global City Making

    [Halshs-00717879, V1] New Port Development and Global City Making

    Author manuscript, published in "Journal of Transport Geography 25 (2012) 58-69" New port development and global city making: Emergence of the Shanghai-Yangshan multilayered gateway hub Chengjin WANG Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR) Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Beijing 100101, China [email protected] César DUCRUET French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) UMR 8504 Géographie-cités F-75006 Paris, France [email protected] Abstract Planned as Shanghai's new port, Yangshan is currently expanding its roles as transhipment hub and integrated logistics/industrial center in the Asia-Pacific region. This paper examines the impact of the emergence of Yangshan on the spatial pattern of the Yangtze River Delta since the 1970s, with reference to existing port system spatial evolutionary halshs-00717879, version 1 - 13 Nov 2012 models. While this emergence confirms the trend of offshore hub development and regionalization processes observed in other regions, we also discuss noticeable deviations due to territorial and governance issues. Strong national policies favoring Shanghai's vicinity rather than Ningbo as well as the growth of Yangshan beyond sole transhipment functions all contribute to Shanghai's transformation into a global city. Keywords: Asia; China; corridor; offshore hub; port system evolution; urban growth; Yangtze River Delta 1 1. Introduction Throughout the literature on port cities, a majority of the research provides a separate discussion on either port or urban functions. Port and urban specialists often focus on what may appear as processes and actors of distinctly different nature. One example is the large body of research on so-called port systems where neighbouring port nodes go through successive development phases marked by varying traffic concentration levels.
  • Visit Ohio's Historic Bridges

    Visit Ohio's Historic Bridges

    SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION Visit Ohio’s Historic Bridges Historic and unique bridges have a way of sticking in our collective memories. Many of us remember the bridge we crossed walking to school, a landmark on the way to visit relatives, the gateway out of town or a welcoming indication that you are back in familiar territory. The Ohio Department of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ohio Historic Bridge Association, Ohio History Connection’s State Historic Preservation Office, TourismOhio and historicbridges.org, has assembled a list of stunning bridges across the state that are well worth a journey. Ohio has over 500 National Register-listed and historic bridges, including over 150 wooden covered bridges. The following map features iron, steel and concrete struc- tures, and even a stone bridge built when canals were still helping to grow Ohio’s economy. Some were built for transporting grain to market. Other bridges were specifically designed to blend into the scenic landscape of a state or municipal park. Many of these featured bridges are Ohio Historic Bridge Award recipients. The annual award is given to bridge owners and engineers that rehabilitate, preserve or reuse historic structures. The awards are sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration, ODOT and Ohio History Connection’s State Historic Preservation Office. Anthony Wayne Bridge - Toledo, OH Ohio Department of Transportation SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION 2 17 18 SOUTHEAST REGION in eastern Ohio, Columbiana County has Metropark’s Huntington Reservation on the community. A project that will rehabilitate several rehabilitated 1880’s through truss shore of Lake Erie along US 6/Park Drive.
  • Coincides with MANUFACTURING EXPO 2011 at Bangkok International Trade & Exhibition Centre (BITEC) Bangkok, Thailand L Hall 106 L 23-26 June 2011

    Coincides with MANUFACTURING EXPO 2011 at Bangkok International Trade & Exhibition Centre (BITEC) Bangkok, Thailand L Hall 106 L 23-26 June 2011

    BANGKOK n ee 2011 PARTNERSHIP FOR GROWTH Coincides with MANUFACTURING EXPO 2011 At Bangkok International Trade & Exhibition Centre (BITEC) Bangkok, Thailand l Hall 106 l 23-26 June 2011 INDIA IS THE PARTNER COUNTRY AT MANUFACTURING EXPO 2011 BANGKOK n ee 2011 PARTNERSHIP FOR GROWTH Coincides with MANUFACTURING EXPO 2011 Bangkok International Trade & Exhibition Centre (BITEC) Bangkok, Thailand l Hall 106 l 23-26 June 2011 EEPC India invites you to participate at its next INDEE in Bangkok, Thailand from 23 to 26 June 2011. The show will be a part of Manufacturing Expo 2011, an event that brings together the most varied and complete exhibition of the latest in Machinery and Technologies in key industries like Automotive, Electronics, Plastic, Mold & Die, Machine Tools, Industrial Tools, Welding & Cutting Equipment, Subcontracting and related services. INDIA IS THE PARTNER COUNTRY AT MANUFACTURING EXPO 2011 Bangkok’s Bhumibol Bridge or Mega Bridge is part of the 13 km long Industrial Ring Road connecting southern Bangkok with Samut Prakan Province. The bridge crosses the Chao Phraya River twice, with two striking cable-stayed spans of lengths of 702 m and 582 m Reflections of Bangkok city in the Chao Phraya River FOCUS PRODUCTS OF INDEE BANGKOK 2011 • Auto parts and spares and components • Construction machinery including earth • Electric wires & cables • Pharmaceutical machinery, medical moving equipment, cranes, • Electrical items devices, medical equipment, surgical lifts and winches • Electrodes equipment • Copper alloy/wires • Fencing
  • The World Bank Urban Transport Policy Prevailing at the Time of Preparation Was Published in 1986

    The World Bank Urban Transport Policy Prevailing at the Time of Preparation Was Published in 1986

    Document of The WorldBank Public Disclosure Authorized FOR OFFICIALUSE ONLY Report No: 22334 IMPLEMENTATIONCOMPLETION REPORT (IDA-22960) Public Disclosure Authorized ON A CREDIT IN THE AMOUNTOF SDR 44.4 MILLION(US$60.0 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO TBE PEOPLE'SREPUBLIC OF CHINA FOR A SHANGHAIMETROPOLITAN TRANSPORT PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized JUNE 29, 2001 This documenthas a restricteddistribution and may be used by recipientsonly in the performanceof their 7 officialduties. Its contentsmay not otherwisebe disclosedwithout World Bank authorization. Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCYEQUIVALENTS (ExchangeRate EffectiveDecember 31, 2000) Currency Unit = Yuan (Y) Y 1.00 = US$ 0.120817 US$ 1 = Y 8.2770 FISCALYEAR January 1 - December 31 ABBREVIATIONSAND ACRONYMS ATC - Area Traffic Control BAA - Barton AschimanAssociates CBD - Central Business District CCTV - Close Circuit Television ETC - Electronic Toll Collection IRR - Inner Ring Road MV - Motor Vehicle NBF - Non Bank Funded NMV - Non-Motor Vehicle NSC - North-South Corridor NUTI - NorthwesternUniversity Traffic Institute PDR - Preliminary Design Report PGS - Parking Guidance System PT - Public Transport TA - Technical Assistance TMP - Traffic Management Program TMS - TrafficManagement and Safety SMCC - ShanghaiMunicipal Construction Commission SMEAD - ShanghaiMunicipal Engineering Administration Department SMEC - SnowyMountain Engineering Corporation SMECC - ShanghaiMunicipal Engineering Construction Company SMG - ShanghaiMunicipal Government SMTAB - ShanghaiMunicipal Transport Administration
  • And Bridge Overloads

    And Bridge Overloads

    FINAL REPORT Development of Risk Models for Florida's Bridge Management System (Reuters) Contract No. BDK83 977-11 John O. Sobanjo Florida State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 2525 Pottsdamer St. Tallahassee, FL 32310 Paul D. Thompson Consultant 17035 NE 28th Place Bellevue, WA 98008 Prepared for: State Maintenance Office Florida Department of Transportation Tallahassee, FL 32309 June 2013 Final Report ii Disclaimer The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), or Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Final Report iii SI* (MODERN METRIC) CONVERSION FACTORS APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in Inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft Feet 0.305 meters m yd Yards 0.914 meters m mi Miles 1.61 kilometers km SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL AREA in2 Square inches 645.2 square millimeters mm2 ft2 Square feet 0.093 square meters m2 yd2 square yard 0.836 square meters m2 ac acres 0.405 hectares ha mi2 square miles 2.59 square kilometers km2 SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms
  • New Port Development and Global City Making: Emergence of the Shanghai-Yangshan Multilayered Gateway Hub Chengjin Wang, César Ducruet

    New Port Development and Global City Making: Emergence of the Shanghai-Yangshan Multilayered Gateway Hub Chengjin Wang, César Ducruet

    New port development and global city making: Emergence of the Shanghai-Yangshan multilayered gateway hub Chengjin Wang, César Ducruet To cite this version: Chengjin Wang, César Ducruet. New port development and global city making: Emergence of the Shanghai-Yangshan multilayered gateway hub. Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, 2012, 25, pp.58-69. halshs-00717879 HAL Id: halshs-00717879 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00717879 Submitted on 13 Nov 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. New port development and global city making: Emergence of the Shanghai-Yangshan multilayered gateway hub Chengjin WANG Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR) Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Beijing 100101, China [email protected] César DUCRUET French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) UMR 8504 Géographie-cités F-75006 Paris, France [email protected] Abstract Planned as Shanghai's new port, Yangshan is currently expanding its roles as transhipment hub and integrated logistics/industrial center in the Asia-Pacific region. This paper examines the impact of the emergence of Yangshan on the spatial pattern of the Yangtze River Delta since the 1970s, with reference to existing port system spatial evolutionary models.
  • The Ship Reporting System in Deep Water Route of Ningbo

    The Ship Reporting System in Deep Water Route of Ningbo

    THE SHIP REPORTING SYSTEM IN DEEP WATER ROUTE OF NINGBO-ZHOUSHAN PORT 1. Applicable Ships The Ship Reporting System is compulsory and applicable to the following types of ships which implement the “Ships’ Routeing System in Ningbo-Zhoushan Core Area”： 1.1 Passenger ships; 1.2 Ships and facilities in foreign nationality; 1.3 Dangerous cargo ships; 1.4 Ships and facilities restricted in maneuverability such as towing fleet; 1.5 Other Chinese ships of 300GT and above. 2. Applicable Geographical Area, the Number and Editions of Relevant Charts 2.1 The geographical area covered by the Ship Reporting System is the water area covering the outside door of deep-water route in Xiazhimen, Xiazhimen, Zhitouyang, Luotou waterways, Jintang waterways, Hengshuiyang, Cezi waterways, Xihoumen and so on. 2.2 The relevant charts Nautical Charts published by Maritime Safety Administration of the People’s Republic of China published, with No. of 50311, 52141, 53342, 52142, 53131 and 53132. 3. Format of Report, Content of Report and Reporting Lines 3.1 Format of Report The format for report is in accordance with the requirements by the annex of IMO Resolution A.851 (20). 3.2 Content of Report 3.2.1 General report A Ship’s name, Call Sign and IMO code (if applicable) C or D Position (latitude and longitude or position relative to the landmark) E Course F Speed G Last port of call I Port of destination O Draft Q Deficiencies and limitations (towing vessels shall report of the towing length and the name of the object being towed) DG Dangerous goods U Length Overall and Gross Tonnage 3.2.2 Ships equipped with AIS in good working condition may only need to report the following contents: A Ship’s name, Call Sign G Last port of call I Port of destination O Draft Q Deficiencies and limitations DG Dangerous goods 3.3 Reporting lines 3.3.1 Report line L1: the line connecting the Taohua Island Lighthouse and Xiazhi Island East point.