DOCSLIB.ORG

Knihovna Františka Procházky

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Knihovna Františka Procházky Knihovna Ing. Františka Procházky, Pivovarská 61, 385 01 Vimperk (stav k 31. prosinci 2001) KNIHY + samostatné publikace ACAULIS P. (1977): 66 minikrasavic z Nového Zélandu. - 74 p., Gottwaldov. ACAULIS P. (1978): Americké skalničky pro naše skalky. - 71 p., Gottwaldov. ACTA ECOLOGICA NATURAE AC REGIONIS. Referáty na konferenci k 60. výročí založení ČSBS při ČSAV v Českých Budějovicích. - Terplan Praha. ADLER W., OSWALD K. et FISCHER R. (1994): Exkursionsflora von Österreich. - 1180 p., Eugen Ulmer Stuttgart und Wien. ADRIANI M. J. et MAAREL E. [red.] (1968): Voorne in de branding. - Oostvoorne. AICHINGER E. (1933): Vegetationskunde der Karawanken. - 329 p., Jena. [Ex libris V. Krajina] ALBRECHT J. (1979): Příroda a historie šumavských plání. Průvodce po Jezerní a Chalupské slati a širším okolí Kvildy a Borové Lady. - České Budějovice. ALBRECHT J. et al. (2003): Českobudějovicko. – In: MACKOVČIN P. et SEDLÁČEK M (eds.), Chráněná území ČR, vol. 8: 1–807, AOPK ČR Praha. ALEŠKOV. I. et all. (1987): Po stranuyam krasnoj knigy rastěnija. - 248 p., Minsk. ALEXEJEV B. D. (1987): Zajímavosti ze světa rostlin. - 142 p., Praha. ALIBERTIS A. (1997): Die Orchideen von Kreta und Karpathos. – 159 p., Kuwidis & Manuras, Heraklion. ALLRAM R. (1881–1884): Die Phanerogamen-Flora um Krummau. – Jahresber. Staatsobergymn. Krummau 8 (1880–1881): 3–24. 1881; 9 (1881–1882): 25–61, 1882; 10 (1882–1883): 62–96, 1883; 11 (1883–1884): 97–112, 1884. [Xerokopie] AMANN G. (1997): Stromy a keře lesa. – 228 p., Steinbrener Vimperk. AMBERGEROVÁ-OCHSENBAUEROV8 S. (2001): Pokojové kapradiny. – 63 p., Vašut, Praha. AMBROS M. (1996): Floristický kurz - Partizánske 2. - 9. Júla 1994. - Rosalia, Spravodaj ochrany prírody okresu Nitra a CHKO Ponitrie, Nitra, 163 p. ANDĚRA M. et HORÁČEK I. (1982): Poznáváme naše savce. - 254 p., Praha. ANDĚRA M. et ZAVŘEL P. et al. (2003): Šumava. Příroda, historie, život. – 800 p., Baset, Praha. ANDERS J. (1928): Die Strauch- und Laubflechten Mitteleuropas. Anleitung zum Bestimmen der in Mitteleuropa vorkommenden Strauch- und Laubflechten. - 217 p. + příl.. Jena. ANDREEV V. N. (1987): Krasnaja kniga Jakutskoj ASSR. – 247 p., Novosibirsk. ANONYMUS (1931): Koniferové školky Žehušice u Čáslavě. Katalog podzim - jaro 1931-32. - 118 p., Žehušice. ANONYMUS (1963): Angewandte Dendrologie im Thüringer Becken. - 165 p., Berlin. ANONYMUS (1968): Boubínský prales - 110. výročí. – 90 p., 1 map, Lesnická práce, Praha. ANONYMUS (1969): 2. Kolloquium. Naturschutz im Ostseeraum. Stralsund 1969. - 151 p., Greifswald. ANONYMUS (1970): Flora na známkách. - 85 p., Brno. ANONYMUS (1980): Chráněné rostliny v botanických zahradách, jejich pěstování a zakládání sbírek, 16. - 17. října 1980. Vol. 1 (1 - 60), Vol. 2 (1 - 135). - Bot. Zahr. Troja, Praha. ANONYMUS (1986): Problematika záchrany ohrožených rostlin. - 128 p., Pobočka ČSVTS při středisku SPPOP Středočeského kraje, Praha. ANONYMUS (1988): Das Mühlviertel. Natur - Kultur - Leben. Vol.1 (Katalog - 419 p.) + Vol. 2 (Beiträge - 484 p.). - Linz [Oberösterreichische Landesausstelung 1988, 21. Mai bis 30. Oktober 1988 im Schloss Weinberg bei Kefermarkt]. ANONYMUS (1992): Velká kniha o zahradě. - 592 p., Blesk Ostrava. ANONYMUS (1994): Sušené květiny. - 65 p., Praha. ANONYMUS (1995): Natuur over wegen. (Nature across motorways). - 103 p., Drukkerij Modern, Bennekom. ANONYMUS (1996): Statistická ročenka životního prostředí České republiky 1996. – 337 p., Český ekologický ústav, Praha. ANONYMUS (1981): Schützen und blühen lassen! Ed. 5. - 156 p., Bayrisches Staatsministrerium für Landesentwicklung und Umweltfragen München. ANONYMUS [Academy of sciences of the USSR] (1975): Abstracts of the papers presented at the XII international botanical congress. July 3 - 10, 1975. Vol. I - II. – Nauka, Leningrad. ANONYMUS [Academy of sciences of the USSR] (1979): International botanical congress, Leningrad, 3 - 10 July, 1975. List of participants. – Nauka, Leningrad. ANONYMUS [Bayerischen Staatsministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten] (1987): Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald. - 124 p., Wolnzach. ANONYMUS [Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Landesentwicklung und Umweltfragen] (1983): Rote Liste bedrohter Farn- und Blütenpflanzen in Bayern. - 40 p., Bayreuth. ANONYMUS [Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Landesentwicklung und Umweltfragen] (1979): Schützen und leben lasen! Geschützte Tiere. - 224 p., München. ANONYMUS [Česká komise pro vědeckotechnický a investiční rozvoj – Terplan] (1987): Ochrana a využití fytogeofondu. Součesný stav výzkumu a metodické přístupy. - 74 p., Praha. ANONYMUS [Česká vědeckotechnická společnost] (1976): Životní prostředí východočeského kraje. - 139 p., Dům techniky Pardubice. ANONYMUS (1976): Příroda, člověk a svět. Kapitoly o tvorbě a ochraně životního prostředí. - 178 p., Nakladatelství Vyšehrad Praha. ANONYMUS (1964): Hygiena zeleně. Sborn. Konf. 15. - 18. 3. 1964, Olomouc. - 178 p., OHES,.Olomouc ANONYMUS [Správa KRNAP Vrchlabí]: Chráněné území ve světě. Přírodní parky Kanady, Polské národní parky, Srí Lanka, Národní parky SSSR, Turecko, Japonsko, Austrálie, Finsko, Německá demokratická republika, Dánsko a Grónsko, Francie, Španělsko. – Vrchlabí. ANONYMUS [Zentralstelle für die floritische Kartierung der Bundesrepublik Deutchland (Nord)] (1993): Standardliste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen der Bundesrepublik Deutchland (vorläufige Fassung). - Floristische Rundbriefe, Göttingen, Beih. 3:1-478. ANONYMUS [Arbeitskreis Heimische Orchideen Thüringen e. V.] (1997): Orchideen in Thüringen. – 256., Vaerlagshaus Frisch, Eisenach. ANONYMUS (2001): Conference documentation Planta Europa. Third European conference od the conservation of wild plants, 23–28 June 2001. – Průhonice, 99 pp. ANONYMUS (s. d.): Nationalparks und Flora der Kanarischen Inseln. – 96 p., Otermin ediciones, S. C. ANTONÍN V. et al. (2003) vide KOTLABA F. (2003) APEL J. et NOTHDURFT H. (1964): Botanischer Garten der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg. Führer durch Frieland und Schauhäuser. Ed. 2. - Hamburg. ARGCHEZI T. (1963): Die Karpaten. Ed. 3. - Bukarest. [ASCHERSON P. (1864): Flora der Provinz Brandenburg – pars Orchidaceae p. 677-701 vide Ascherson et Graebner 1905-1907] ASCHERSON P. et GRAEBNER P. (1896-1898): Synopsis der mitteleuropäischen Flora. Vol. 1. - Leipzig. ASCHERSON P. et GRAEBNER P. (1905-1907): Synopsis der Mitteleuropäischen Flora. - Leipzig. [Orchidaceae p. 612-929] + ASCHERSON P. (1864): Flora der Provinz Brandenburg. - Berlin. (Orchidaceae p. 677-701)] ATTENBOROUGH D. (1990): Planeta žije. - 334 p., Praha. ATTENBOROUGH D. (1995): Soukromý život rostlin. - 320 p., Praha. BALÁT F. (1986): Klíč k určování našich ptáků v přírodě. - 320 p., Praha. BALÁTOVÁ-TULÁČKOVÁ E. (1972): Flachmoorwiesen im mittleren und unteren Opava - Tal (Schlesien) - Vegetace ČSSR, Praha, A4, 1-201. BALÁTOVÁ-TULÁČKOVÁ E. (1978): Die Nass- und Feuchtwiesen Nordwest-Böhmens mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Magnocaricetalia-Gesellschaften. - Rozpr. Čs. Akad. Věd, sect. math.-natur. 88/3: 1-113. BALÁTOVÁ-TULÁČKOVÁ E. (1983): Feuchtwiesen des Landschaftschutzgebietes Šumava (Böhmerwald). – Folia Mus. Rer. Natur. Bohem. Occident., ser. bot., 18-19: 1-82. BALÁŽ D., MARHOLD K. et URBAN P. [eds.] (2001): Červený zoznam rastlín a živočíchov Slovenska. – Ochr. Prír. 20, Banská Bystrica, Suppl.: 1–160. BANERJI M. L. et PRADHAN P. (1984): The Orchids od Nepal Himalaya. – 534 p., J. Cramer, Vaduz. BANKS D. P. (1999): Tropical Orchids of Thailand and SE Asia. – 64 p., Asia Books, Bangkok. BANYARD P. J. (1982): Přírodní divy světa. - 191 p., Praha. BARANOV P. A. (1953): Vznik a vývoj rostlinstva. - Praha. BARKER B. J., DENNIS N. et HARPE R. (2003): Národní parky a divoká příroda jižní Afriky. – 176 p., Beta, Praha. BARŠOVÁ E. (1990): Kouzlo květiny. - 127 p., Praha. BÁRTA Z. et all. (1973): Příroda mostecka. - 146 p., Liberec. BARUŠ V. [red.] (1989): Červená kniha 2. Kruhoústí, ryby, obojživelníci, plazy, savci. - 133 p., Praha. BAUER L. [red.] (1972-1974): Handbuch der Naturschutzgebiete der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik. Vol. 1-5. - Leipzig. Vol. 1 (1972): Bezirke Rostock, Schwerin und Neubrandenburg. Vol. 2 (1972): Bezirke Potsdam, Berlin, Frankfurt/O. und Cottbus. Vol. 5 (1974): Bezirke Leipzig, Karl-Marx-Stadt und Dresden. BAUER L.et WEINITSCHKE H. (1973): Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz. - 382 p., Jena. BAUMANN H. et KÜNKELE S. (1982): Die wildwachsenden Orchideen Europas. - 432 p., 249 photo color., 191 map., Stuttgart. BAUMANN H. et MÜLLER T. (2001): Farbatlas Geschützte und gefährdete Pflanzen. – 316 p., Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart. BAUR J. et TVRZ F. (1988): Minerály. - 207 p., Praha. BAYER A. (1937): Botanika speciální. Ed.2. - 1048 p.+příl., Praha. BEAZLEY M. (1980): Království zvířat. - 136 p., Praha. BEGON B., HARPER J. L. et TOWNSEND C. R. (1997): Ekologie. Jedinci, populace a společenstva. – 949 p., Univerzita Palackého Olomouc. BELDIE A. (1967): Flora si vegetatia muntilor Bucegi. - 578 p., Bucuresti. BELLA P. et ELIÁŠ M. (1997): Slovensko. Sprístupnené jaskyne. – 64 p., Knižné centrum, Žilina. BĚLOCHOVÁ I. (1982): Výběrová bibliografie Krkonoš 1963-1978. Vol 1-2 . - 532 p., Hradec Králové-Vrchlabí. BĚLOCHOVÁ I. et DUCHOŇOVÁ M. (1985): Výběrová bibliografie Krkonoš 1979-1981. - 288 p., Hradec Králové-Vrchlabí. BENČAŤOVÁ B. et UJHÁZY K. [eds.] (1998): Floristický kurz Zvolen 1997. – 94 p., Technická univerzita, Zvolen. BENDER L. (1993): Síla rostlin. - 108 p., Praha. BENEŠ J. et KONVIČKA M. [eds.] (2002): Motýli České republiky: Rozšíření a ochrana. Vol. 1–2, 857 p., SOM Praha. BENKERT D., FUKAREK F. et KORSCH H. [eds.] (1996):
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 141–272 City Management and Administration the First Second
    City Management and Administration The First Second Third Book 141–272 City Management and Administration Tomáš Hudeček The Second Book Good City Administration in the Conditions of the Czech Republic © text Tomáš Hudeček © 2020 Prague Institute of Planning and Development Graphic Design © Martin Odehnal ISBN 978-80-88377-17-7 Contents The Second Book Good City Administration in the Conditions of the Czech Republic Introduction 147 IV. Decision-Making and City Administration 149 10. Decision-making and decision 151 11. Primary and secondary decisions of the city 165 12. Basic areas, limits and role of city administration 177 V. Good Governance of Big Cities 191 13. Basic differences in the governance 193 of small and large cities 14. The stratification of the self-government 207 of a big city 15. Complexity of big city administration 217 VI. Planning 231 16. Planning and strategy 233 17. City development strategies 245 18. Development of the city’s territory 259 Introduction In the second book, we will look at cities, their functioning and behavior from a completely opposite perspective than in the first book. Using knowledge of general development and knowing the basic triad of concentration characterized by the triadic measure of chaos, order, and choice (chaos—order— choice), we will try to unify the dualities of (1) system – deci- sion, (2) city – human, and (3) order – chaos. In the first part of this book, we will therefore focus in detail on the essence of decisions and the process by which deci- sions are made: also known as decision-making. Using several analogies between human decision-making and processes tak- ing place in the highest management layers of the city, we will try to illustrate the essence of making every single decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Přehled Českého Nemovitostního Trhu Czech Real Estate Market Survey
    PŘEHLED ČESKÉHO NEMOVITOSTNÍHO TRHU CZECH REAL ESTATE MARKET SURVEY PENTA titulka Trend Report FINAL.indd 1 23.02.17 13:54 Generální partner ARTN AREMD General Partner Partneři ARTN AREMD Partners The content of Trend Report 2017 is based on the expert discussion of AREMD members, their own analysis and prognosis of future developments, and should be considered a discussion material. We welcome your comments and reactions at [email protected]. Association for Real Estate Market Development thanks to all experts who contributed to the production of the publication: Diblík Ondřej, Lexxus Drtina Tomáš, GfK Czech Frait Jan, Česká národní banka Fröhlichová Tereza, ACHOUR & PARTNERS advokátní kancelář Hejlová Hana, Česká národní banka Hlaváček Michal, Česká národní banka Holub Emil, Clifford Chance Chaloupka Radek, KPMG Kaděrová Martina, AREMD Klapalová Zdenka, Knight Frank Klas Přemysl, KPMG Česká republika Klečka Karel, Patria investiční společnost Kosman Kamil, KAAP Media Kostrounová Lenka, ČSOB Kozáková Daniela, Havel, Holásek & Partners Mládek Martin, Invicta Law, advokátní kancelář Mocková Marie, Hypoteční banka Novák Pavel, Knight Frank Nováková Hana, Invicta Law, advokátní kancelář Pažitka David, Klépierre Pácal Jiří, Central Europe Holding Polák Radek, Trigema Sadil Jan, Hypoteční Banka Soural Marcel, Trigema Svoboda Prokop, Svoboda &Williams Šindelářová Lenka, BNP Paribas Real Estate Czech Republic Špaček Ondřej, KPMG Česká republika Štys Daniel, CBRE Toman Petr, KPMG Česká republika Vlk Ondřej, Colliers Association for Real Estate Market
    [Show full text]
  • EIA in Prague, Tables Informace Z Ročenky Praha ŽP 2004, Tabulky
    EIA in Prague, tables informace z ročenky Praha ŽP 2004, tabulky Tab. - Overview of the number of notices at the level of MHMP pursuant to the Act No. 244/1992 Code within the period from 1. 9. 2003 to 31. 8. 2004) EIA activity Date of notification Date of public hearing, Issuing phase of the EIA process of Statement Second intensification of the Central 21. 12. 2001 Notification without documentation Waste Water delivered Treatment Plant Prague, Troja Island, Prague 6 Source: OŽP MHMP Tab. - Overview of EIA activities pursuant to the Act No. 244/1992 Code processed by the MŽP ČR, state from 1. 9. 2003 to 31. 8. 2004 EIA activity Date of notification Date of public hearing, Issuing phase of the EIA process of Statement Prague ring road, construction 520, 28. 2. 2001 Additional information Březiněves - Satalice Exit 4D1 and transport connection of 18. 7. 2001 Cancelled on the West 15. 1. 2004 Commercial Zone Průhonice Fast-train railway Prague–Ruzyně 21. 12. 2001 Public hearing on 25. 4. 2003, Airport–Kladno, documentation returned to add I phase other alternative route Source: OŽP MHMP Tab. - Overview of EIA activities under the responsibility of the OŽP MHMP pursuant to the Act No. 100/2001 Code, status from 1. 9. 2003 to 31. 8. 2004 (Order number means the order of the EIA process in the EIA Information System since the Act No. 100/2001 Code has become effective, i.e. since 1. 1. 2002.) No. Name of activity Date of the EIA Conclusion of the Phase of the EIA project notification preliminary procedure 003 Printing house 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Prague Castle at Castles Dotting the Green Hills of the Dusk Or Walk Across the River on the St
    519808 Ch01.qxd 3/20/03 9:32 AM Page 17 The Czech Republic: Coming Out of the Past 1by Memphis Barbree The Czech Republic, epicenter of the middle of the western part of the Bohemian power for centuries and country. locked away behind the Iron Curtain Scaffolding, the clinking of stone for half of the 20th century, is more hammers, and trucks full of concrete than a decade out in the fresh air and debris and other general ruckus of free world and in the middle of a construction are common elements of metamorphosis to rival that of any life, especially in Prague. Centuries- Kafka novel. Prague, in particular, is old buildings are getting fresh coats of fashioning a whole new economic and paint and being restored to their full social identity while a world of grandeur. In this old European atmos- beauty-hungry tourists look on. phere, you can almost feel the pres- With the Iron Curtain gone, curios- ence of legendary figures like Holy ity seekers have flooded into Prague, Roman Emperor Charles IV, Franz marveling at the treasures of this Kafka, and adopted son Wolfgang ancient city that were seemingly Amadeus Mozart and where locals and tucked away in mothballs until The guidebooks can and do talk of ghosts Velvet Revolution. Hundreds of years and magic. Believer or no, when you of history are on display, from fairytale see the silhouette of Prague Castle at castles dotting the green hills of the dusk or walk across the river on the St. Bohemian countryside, to baroque Charles bridge at midnight, or stand buildings enlivening the most mun- among the crypts of ancient kings and dane streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeologické Rozhledy 2009
    NOVÉ PUBLIKACE ARCHEOLOGICKÉHO ÚSTAVU AV ČR, PRAHA, v.v.i. NEW BOOKS FROM THE INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY IN PRAGUE ARCHEOLOGIE PRAVĚKÝCH ČECH. Sv. 1–8. Editoři řady: Luboš Jiráň – Natalie Venclová. Praha 2007–2008. Při odběru kompletní řady 2790 Kč; ceny jednotlivých svazků viz níže. – Czech. Complete set: 110 €. Svazek 1: Martin Kuna (ed.) et al.: Pravěký svět a jeho poznání. Praha 2007. 163 s. 400 Kč / 16 €. Svazek 2: Slavomil Vencl (ed.) – Jan Fridrich: Paleolit a mezolit. Praha 2007. 164 s. 400 Kč / 16 €. Svazek 3: Ivan Pavlů (ed.) – Marie Zápotocká: Neolit. Praha 2007. 118 s. 320 Kč / 13 €. Svazek 4: Evžen Neustupný (ed.) et al.: Eneolit. Praha 2008. 185 s. 420 Kč / 16 €. € Archeologické rozhledy LXI–2009, sešit 4 Svazek 5: Luboš Jiráň (ed.) et al.: Doba bronzová. Praha 2008. 265 s. 450 Kč / 18 . Svazek 6: Natalie Venclová (ed.) et al.: Doba halštatská. Praha 2008. 173 s. 400 Kč / 16 €. Recenzovaný časopis Svazek 7: Natalie Venclová (ed.) et al.: Doba laténská. Praha 2008. 164 s. 400 Kč / 16 €. Vydává Archeologický ústav Akademie věd České republiky, Praha, v.v.i. Svazek 8: Vladimír Salač (ed.) et al.: Doba římská a stěhování národů. Praha 2008. 214 s. 400 Kč / 16 €. Peer–reviewed journal published by the Institute of Archaeology, Prague. Jaromír Beneš – Petr Pokorný edd.: BIOARCHEOLOGIE V ČESKÉ REPUBLICE – Bioarchaeology in the Czech Republic. České Budějovice – Praha 2008. 518 s. Czech with English summaries. 400 Kč / 14 €. http://www.arup.cas.cz BURG – VORBURG – SUBURBIUM. ZUR PROBLEMATIK DER NEBENAREALE FRÜHMITTELATERLICHER http://www.arup.cas.cz/cz/publikace/rozhledy.html ZENTREN.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2016 Pražská Plynárenská, A.S., and the Pražská Plynárenská, A.S. Group
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016 Pražská plynárenská, a.s., and the Pražská plynárenská, a.s. Group PRAŽSKÁ PLYNÁRENSKÁ Combining energy and services CONTENTS 3 Introductory words by the Chairman 24 Report on the Business Activities of the of the Board of Directors Pražská Plynárenská, a.s. Group 4 Selected data about the Company 24 Data on the Group’s activities and financial 4 Basic information about the Company position 6 Ownership interests 26 Financial situation 8 Information about the Company’s 26 Activities in the field of research and bodies and management development 26 Human resources management 13 Report of the board of directors on 27 Risk management at PP, a.s. the business activity of the company and its assets 13 The energy industry in 2016 27 Other information 13 Information about the Company’s 28 Important events at the beginning of 2017 activities and financial position 14 Earnings before tax 28 Expected development of the Group 15 Financial situation 30 Financial section 15 Summary of real estate owned by PP, 31 Individual financial statements a.s. 16 Natural gas trading 36 Notes to the individual financial statements 16 Electricity trading 51 Consolidated financial statements 16 Marketing and customer care 56 Notes to the consolidated financial 18 Clean mobility statements 19 Social responsibility 20 Cooperation with other energy 93 Information about the persons responsible companies for the annual report and audit of financial 20 Information technology statements 21 Human resources management 22 Environment 94 Report on relations between the controlling 23 Risk management at PP, a.s. and controlled entity and on relations 23 Information about research of between the controlled entity and other development of new products or entities controlled by the same controlling procedures in the current accounting entity (related entities) for 2016 period 100 Abbreviations 102 Auditor’s report This annual report was compiled pursuant to Act No.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic in Co-Operation with Prague City Hall
    Annamaria Veselá Strana 1 22.12.200606 Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic in co-operation with Prague City Hall SINGLE PROGRAMMING DOCUMENT FOR OBJECTIVE 2 FOR THE PRAGUE NUTS 2 REGION IN THE PERIOD 2004 – 2006 THE CZECH REPUBLIC December 2003 CCI: 2003 CZ 16 2 DO 001 TABLE OF CONTENTS I NTRODUCTION ............................................................... .7 1. BASIC DATA ON THE PRAGUE REGION . .10 1.1 Prague – an important city within Central Europe .. .10 1.2 Prague – capital city and regional centre . .12 1.3 Basic features of the region ..................................... .13 1.3.1 Basic geographical data, administrative division and structure of s ettlement in the P rague region ........................................................................................... .13 1.3.2 Demographic indicators and the social environment . .14 2. ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SITUATION OF THE REGION . .18 2.1 The region’s performance and the sectoral structure of the economy . .18 2.2 Human resources and the labour market . .24 2.3 Technical infrastructure ..................................... .29 2.4 Transport infrastructure and services . .32 2.5 The environment . .33 2.6 Institutional infrastructure facilities of the region ....................................... .36 2.7 Supportive measures implemented in the region . .37 2.7.1 Support for small and medium-sized enterprises . .38 2.7.2 Development of human resources .................................... .41 2.7.3 Technical facilities and services of the area . .41 2.7.4 Transport . .42 2.7.5 Information society . .43 3. SELECTION AND BASIC FEATURES OF THE AREA SPECIFIED FOR THE P URPOSES OF SPD OBJECTIVE 2 . .44 3.1 Criteria and selection methods . .44 3.2 Analysis of problems of the selected area .
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Market 22 Residential Market
    21 RESIDENTIAL MARKET 22 RESIDENTIAL MARKET In 2016, 6,650 new apartments were sold in Prague, which is a 5.1% increase; in Brno there was even a 50% progress. The average price of available apartments in Prague rose to 75,520 CZK/m 2, which is a year-on-year increase of 17.4%. The top-functioning sub-segment in the residential market are family houses. Apartment houses are only built in a minimum extent. There are still problems in the functioning of the Association of Unit Owners (AUO). The residential market is a crucial part of the lives of best. All forms are essential for the functioning of the the population and economy of the state. The balanced market, and each of them has its own specifics, advan- and proper functioning of all its parts is very important, tages, disadvantages, risks and benefits. including owner-occupied housing in family houses, own- The best functioning forms in our residential market er-occupied apartment housing, cooperative apartments include the ownership of family houses and cooperative and housing in rented apartments. housing. Rentals and housing co-ownership is compli- Unfortunately, the government's cated by poor legislation and lengthy and unpredictable approach to the housing sector court decisions. New housing construction can be based on the latest approved assessed similarly. Family houses are being built across "Rental housing is distorted by social bene- state housing concept or other the board throughout the country, mostly individually. fits. The state was unable to process rental pricing maps." materials and laws is only a However, almost no new apartment buildings were built motley series of isolated inter- in recent years, with some exceptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Data on Housing 2013
    Selected Data on Housing 2013 Development in all areas www.mmr.cz Selected Data on Housing 2013 Ministry of Regional Development of the CR Housing Policy Department Institute for Spatial Development Prague, July 2014 ISBN 978-80-87147-66-5 Content Titles of tables, diagrams, and cartograms are given in italics. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 1 Housing in 2013 .......................................................................................................... 11 1.1 Macroeconomic framework.................................................................................................. 11 1.1.1 Gross domestic product ..................................................................................................... 11 1.1.2 Gross domestic product (diagram) ..................................................................... 11 1.2 Current economic and social situation ................................................................................. 12 1.2.1 Facts on the dwelling stock – final results of the 2011 census accordin to the place of usual residence……. ...................................................................................................... 12 1.2.2 Quality of the dwelling stock – final results of the 2011 census accordin to the place of usual residence .............................................................................................................. 13 1.2.3 Housing construction .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Libuše's Dream
    LIBUŠE’S DREAM: HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN PRAGUE, THE CZECH REPUBLIC by RAMONA MURPHY BARTOS (Under the direction of JOHN C. WATERS) ABSTRACT This study deals with the issue of historic preservation as practiced in Prague, Czech Republic. A developmental history of the city prefaces a discussion of the city’s history of historic preservation practice. Historic preservation in Prague has precedents in medieval law, but formally coalesced in the late nineteenth century, marked by the creation of the Austro- Hungarian governmental agency Central Commission for the Study and Preservation of Built Monuments, and the founding of the Club for Old Prague. This study also analyzes the century of historic preservation legislation in the Czech lands from the Austro-Hungarian empire to the Communist era. Finally, this study examines the legacy of the Communist era and the challenges of post-Communism in regards to historic preservation, and makes recommendations for improvement of both the official and private historic preservation movements in Prague. INDEX WORDS: Prague, Czech Republic, Czechoslovakia, Austro-Hungarian Empire, Historic Preservation, Monument Care, Architectural Conservation LIBUŠE’S DREAM: HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN PRAGUE, THE CZECH REPUBLIC by RAMONA MURPHY BARTOS B.A., Emory University, 1997 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION ATHENS, GEORGIA 2002 © 2002 Ramona Murphy Bartos All Rights Reserved LIBUŠE’S DREAM: HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN PRAGUE, THE CZECH REPUBLIC by RAMONA MURPHY BARTOS Approved: Major Professor: John C. Waters Committee: Mark E. Reinberger Melvin B. Hill, Jr. Thomas J.
    [Show full text]
  • Publikace Praha
    PRAHA ñ indik·tory udrûitelnÈho rozvoje PRAGUE ñ sustainable development indicators Magistrát hl. m. Prahy Prague City Hall Indikátory udrûitelnÈho rozvoje usnadÚujÌ hodnocenÌ Sustainability indicators make the evaluation of progress pokroku k udrûitelnosti, umoûÚujÌ srovn·nÌ s doporuËen˝mi towards sustainable development easier, enable to make hodnotami, legislativnÌmi limity, srovn·nÌ mezi st·ty, regiony, benchmarking to recommended values and legal limits, mÏsty, umoûÚujÌ stanovenÌ cÌl˘ rozvoje a zhodnocenÌ and to compare states, regions, and cities with each other; efektivnosti vynaloûen˝ch prost¯edk˘. enable to set the development objectives, and to evaluate effectiveness of resources spent. Tato broûura obsahuje: This brochure contains: Èást A ñ v˝bÏr z dokumentace p¯ihl·öky hl. m. Prahy Section A ñ Selection from the documentation elaborated for do soutÏûe EvropskÈ zelenÈ mÏsto the application of the City of Prague for the (http://www.europeangreencapital.eu) European Green Capital Award zpracovanÈ v z·¯Ì 2008. Struktura a v˝bÏr indik·tor˘ (http://www.europeangreencapital.eu) vych·zÌ z metodiky soutÏûe. in September 2008. The structure and selection »·st B ñ v˝bÏr z roËenky Praha éivotnÌ prost¯edÌ 2007 of indicators are based on the methodology vydané v dubnu 2008. Sada indikátorù byla of the award. zpracov·na s vyuûitÌm zkuöenostÌ z projekt˘ Section B ñ Selection from the yearbook Prague Environment a metodik 2007 released in April 2008. Elaboration of the · Zpr·vy o stavu ûivotnÌho prost¯edÌ mÏst na Internetu set of indicators is based on experience and (CEROI, 1998) methodology of projects · Spoleèné evropské indikátory (ECI, 2003) · Cities Environment Report on Internet (CEROI) · Urban Ecosystems Europe (UEE, 2006) · European Common Indicators (ECI) · T˝mov· iniciativa pro mÌstnÌ udrûiteln˝ rozvoj · Urban Ecosystems Europe (UEE) (TIMUR) · Team Initiative for Local Sustainable · Strategick˝ pl·n hl.
    [Show full text]
  • Soutěž European Green Capital Award
    European Green Capital Award Application City of Prague Prague City Hall, Department of the Environment Protection September 2008 European Green Capital City of Prague This document has been developed in accordance with requirements of the competition of the European Green Capital Award, that means in the structure and extent corresponding to the on-line application forms - see http://www.europeangreencapital.eu. CONTENT Introduction...............................................................................................................................3 1. Local contribution to global climate change......................................................................4 2. Local transport..................................................................................................................9 3. Availability of green areas open to the public.................................................................16 4. Quality of ambient air......................................................................................................20 5. Noise pollution................................................................................................................29 6. Waste production and management...............................................................................34 7. Water consumption.........................................................................................................39 8. Waste water treatment ...................................................................................................46
    [Show full text]