Appendix 2 , Item 11. PDF 55 KB
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
St Helens Borough Arts Strategy Background Information
ST HELENS BOROUGH ARTS STRATEGY BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Strategy has been developed at a pivotal In developing this Strategy, we have adopted an time for St Helens in terms of its arts and cultural approach which recognises that the Strategy development. In 2023, St Helens will be the Borough needs to be co-produced and co-owned by of Culture for the Liverpool City Region when the Arts sector and that responsibility for its residents, the wider region and the nation will be delivery and implementation will be a shared invited to judge St Helens. This will be a significant responsibility. This is very much in the spirit of the opportunity for St Helens as a place to showcase #StHelenstogether philosophy. This approach has that we have some great assets, organisations, and resulted in a shared recognition of the challenges artists and that we are pioneers in socially engaged ahead and a shared commitment to the Strategy’s arts practice. vision and priorities. The development of the Strategy has been supported and overseen by a We know that we have many of the key ingredients Steering Group consisting of representatives from to produce a thriving and vibrant arts and culture arts organisations, the wider cultural sector, the offer which will support the wider strategic education sector and officers of St Helens Borough ambitions of the Council and the priorities of Arts Council. The Steering Group has played a pivotal Council England and the Liverpool City Region 1 role in shaping the approach of the Strategy, Cultural Compact . -
Explanatory Memorandum to the City of Leeds (Mayoral Referendum) Order 2012
GROUPED EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAM (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF BRADFORD (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF BRISTOL (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF COVENTRY (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF LEEDS (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF LIVERPOOL (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF MANCHESTER (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF NEWCASTLE-UPON-TYNE (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF NOTTINGHAM (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF SHEFFIELD (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 THE CITY OF WAKEFIELD (MAYORAL REFERENDUM) ORDER 2012 2012 Nos. [XXXX] 1. This grouped explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Department for Communities and Local Government and is laid before Parliament by Command of Her Majesty. 2. Purpose of the instruments Each of these Orders require the local authority named therein to hold a referendum, on 3 May 2012, on whether it should start to operate a mayor and cabinet executive form of governance (i.e. have a directly elected mayor). 3. Matters of special interest to the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments None. 4. Legislative Context 4.1 Part 1A (Arrangements with respect to local authority governance in England) and new Schedule A1 (Executive arrangements in England: further provision) of the Local Government Act 2000 (“the 2000 Act”) (as inserted by section 21 of, and Schedule 2 to, the Localism Act 2011 (“the 2011 Act”)), make provision for the governance of local authorities in England. One of the permitted forms of governance, under these provisions, is the mayor and cabinet executive. 4.2 Section 9N of the 2000 Act gives the Secretary of State the power by order to require a specified local authority to hold a referendum on whether the authority should have a directly elected mayor. -
Delivering Better Health and Care for Everyone
Delivering better health and care for everyone Summary of our Five Year Plan You can take a look back at some of the improvements West Yorkshire and Harrogate Health and Care Partnership has been making with local people to improve their lives in our short film here You can also find out more about the positive difference our Partnership is making online here Our Partnership We also want to say thank you to all the ^ Photo credit: Leeds Irish Health and Homes people who’ve shared their stories so far and given their views about health and Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) Harrogate and District NHS care in West Yorkshire and Harrogate. NHS Airedale, Wharfedale Foundation Trust and Craven CCG* Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust Watch our thank you film here NHS Bradford City CCG* Leeds and York Partnership NHS NHS Bradford Districts CCG* Foundation Trust NHS Calderdale CCG Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust NHS Greater Huddersfield CCG Locala Community Partnerships The Mid-Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust We are committed to honesty and NHS Harrogate and Rural District CCG transparency in all our work and NHS Leeds CCG South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS also producing this information in NHS North Kirklees CCG Foundation Trust Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS accessible formats. Our Five Year NHS Wakefield CCG Plan summary is available in: Foundation Trust Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust • Audio Local councils • EasyRead City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council Others involved • BSL Calderdale Council Healthwatch • Animated -
The Tort Liability of American Municipalities*
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Kentucky Kentucky Law Journal Volume 40 | Issue 2 Article 1 1951 The orT t Liability of American Municipalities Chester James Antieau Washburn University Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the State and Local Government Law Commons, and the Torts Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Antieau, Chester James (1951) "The orT t Liability of American Municipalities," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 40 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol40/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TORT LIABILITY OF AMERICAN MUNICIPALITIES* By CHESTER JAMES ANTIEAUT * For torts committed in the performance of activities ultra vires the municipal corporation, the city is customarily immune from liability.1 The great majority of courts further deny municipal liability when negligent torts are committed beyond the author ized powers of particular agents, but infra vires the municipal corporation,2 although there are well-reasoned cases contra. 3 Al- though cities are occasionally held responsible for the wilful torts of employees, 4 the majority rule is contrary - Municipalities have by adoption or ratification been held liable for torts of agents un- authorized but within the power of the municipal corporation.6 Municipalities are regularly not liable for torts when the actor is an independent contractor. -
Local Authority / Combined Authority / STB Members (July 2021)
Local Authority / Combined Authority / STB members (July 2021) 1. Barnet (London Borough) 24. Durham County Council 50. E Northants Council 73. Sunderland City Council 2. Bath & NE Somerset Council 25. East Riding of Yorkshire 51. N. Northants Council 74. Surrey County Council 3. Bedford Borough Council Council 52. Northumberland County 75. Swindon Borough Council 4. Birmingham City Council 26. East Sussex County Council Council 76. Telford & Wrekin Council 5. Bolton Council 27. Essex County Council 53. Nottinghamshire County 77. Torbay Council 6. Bournemouth Christchurch & 28. Gloucestershire County Council 78. Wakefield Metropolitan Poole Council Council 54. Oxfordshire County Council District Council 7. Bracknell Forest Council 29. Hampshire County Council 55. Peterborough City Council 79. Walsall Council 8. Brighton & Hove City Council 30. Herefordshire Council 56. Plymouth City Council 80. Warrington Borough Council 9. Buckinghamshire Council 31. Hertfordshire County Council 57. Portsmouth City Council 81. Warwickshire County Council 10. Cambridgeshire County 32. Hull City Council 58. Reading Borough Council 82. West Berkshire Council Council 33. Isle of Man 59. Rochdale Borough Council 83. West Sussex County Council 11. Central Bedfordshire Council 34. Kent County Council 60. Rutland County Council 84. Wigan Council 12. Cheshire East Council 35. Kirklees Council 61. Salford City Council 85. Wiltshire Council 13. Cheshire West & Chester 36. Lancashire County Council 62. Sandwell Borough Council 86. Wokingham Borough Council Council 37. Leeds City Council 63. Sheffield City Council 14. City of Wolverhampton 38. Leicestershire County Council 64. Shropshire Council Combined Authorities Council 39. Lincolnshire County Council 65. Slough Borough Council • West of England Combined 15. City of York Council 40. -
Training Requirements to Enable Transport Planners, Engineers and Operators to Respond to the Challenge of Legislative Change
This is a repository copy of Training Requirements to Enable Transport Planners, Engineers and Operators to Respond to the Challenge of Legislative Change. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2322/ Monograph: Turvey, I.G. (1987) Training Requirements to Enable Transport Planners, Engineers and Operators to Respond to the Challenge of Legislative Change. Working Paper. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds , Leeds, UK. Working Paper 234 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ White Rose Research Online http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Institute of Transport Studies University of Leeds This is an ITS Working Paper produced and published by the University of Leeds. ITS Working Papers are intended to provide information and encourage discussion on a topic in advance of formal publication. -
(Public Pack)Agenda Document for Cabinet, 23/09/2020 16:00
Town Hall, St. Helens, Merseyside, WA10 1HP Telephone: 01744 673219 (Joanne Griffiths MBE) Agenda CABINET PUBLIC MEETINGS ARE WEBCAST (LIVE STREAMED) Date: Wednesday, 23 September 2020 Time: 4.00 pm Venue: Virtual Membership Councillors: Baines (Chairman), Bell, Bond, Bowden, Burns, Charlton, Gomez- Aspron, Groucutt, McCauley and Quinn Item Title Page 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Minutes of the meeting held on 15 July 2020 3 3. Declarations of Interest from Members 4. Issues Arising from Overview and Scrutiny (a) Apprenticeships for Children We Look After Task Group Interim Report 9 (b) Council's Use of Paper and Plastics Task Group Report 35 (c) Spotlight Review of County Lines Issues in St Helens Scrutiny Task Group 67 Report 5. Performance Report - Quarter 1 - 2020/21 93 6. Peer Review/One Council Update 139 7. Replacement of the Council’s Human Resources and Payroll Systems 159 8. Test and Trace Model for St Helens Borough Council including the Cheshire 167 & Merseyside Hub 9. Proposals to Continue the PAUSE Programme in St Helens 175 Item Title Page ** 10. Local Plan 219 * 11. Highways Programme 2020/21 271 * 12. Town Deal Accelerated Fund and Liverpool City Region Town Centre Fund 281 Update 13. Ofsted Monitoring Report 291 * 14. Development of the Red Bank Educational Unit and Relocation of Penkford 305 Special School 15. Exclusion of the Public Recommended that the public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of the following items for the reason stated: Item Reason (under the Local Government Act 1972) 16 Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding the information) (Para 3 of Schedule 12A) PRIVATE AGENDA * 16. -
GB 0740 Goodchild
GB 0740 Goodchild Wakefield Libraries and Information Services, Local Studies This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 23091 The National Archives ^ m ill' CITY OF WAKEFIELD MD ARCHIVES GOODCRTLD "jJOAlMtg j^j W ALDAM Mf3 GRAND WESTERN CANAL: Report and accounts 1832-33 1839 1843 I845-46 I848-5I Circulars and correspondence I85O-65 Also (loose) : Map of Lines of Canal, notice report 1830 Lines of proposed English & Bristol Channels Ship Canal 1824 Canal Association report: (See W. Aldam ACN MSS. above) EREWASH CANAL: Accounts I885 Notices of Meetings 1883 1884 BRADFORD CANAL: Bradford Canal Co, Reports - Half year ending June 1874 " " " December 1874 Joint Committee Accounts - December I89O November (final) 1923 WILTS AND BERKS CANAL: Reports and accounts 1825 1827-38 1840-42 1845-51 1853-58 1867-72 Subscription List I84O Winding up, case re 1868 Winding up of Company, correspondence and papers re 1875-78 ROCHDALE CANAL: Accounts 1828 Notices of amalgamation meetings I855 ROCHDALE CANAL : (Continued) Accounts 1828 Notices of amalgamation meetings 1855 Notice of dividend warrants I864 1866 1869 1870 1871 (2 copies) 1872 1873 1874 Dividend warrants 1879 (2 copies) 1880 1881 1883 ROADS AND BRIDGES: TINSLEY & DONCASTER ROAD: Acts 1826 I84I Branch to Mexborough, plan I84O Case on Bill I84I Notices of meetings and papers 1853-70 Statements of accounts 1842 1844 1847 I848 I869 BAY/TRY AND TINSLEY ROAD: Acts 1825 I856 Statements of accounts I855-58 BALBY AND WORKSOP ROAD: Act I858 Statements of accounts I85O-58 BARNSDALE AND LEEDS ROAD: Plan of roads between Leeds and Doncaster 1822 Statements of accounts 1831-32 Scale of tolls n*d* Proposal to pay off £500 1859 Opposition to Bill l85 6 JESDS AND LIVERPOOL CANAL Accounts (with some additional notes) 1787 1809-41 I843-44 1847-59 I86I-64 1867-68 1882 Correspondence, reports, newspaper cuttings, etc. -
S Littler Draft Proof
PLR.SL.1 PROOF OF EVIDENCE: BACKGROUND TO SCHEME AND FUNDING STEPHEN LITTLER MRICS (APP/H4315/V/20/3253230 - A49-A573 LINK ROAD (St Helens) APP/M0655/V/20/3253232 - A49-A573 LINK ROAD (Warrington)) CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 HISTORY OF PROJECT 2 3.0 FUNDING 6 4.0 PRESENT STATUS OF THE PLR 9 5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 11 APPENDICES (PRESENTED SEPARATELY) Appendix 1: Parkside’s Strategic Location Drawing Appendix 2: Letter Confirming Funding Commitment from Parkside Regeneration Limited Appendix 3: Land Acquisition Drawing Appendix 4: Letter Confirming Reprogramming of Liverpool City Region Strategic Infrastructure Fund Award Appendix 5: Letter from iSec Ltd PLR.SL.1- Pg 1 1.0 Introduction 1.1 My name is Stephen Paul Littler. I am a Member of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (“RICS”) having qualified in 2000 and I am also an RICS Registered Valuer. 1.2 I am currently the Assistant Director for Property & Economy within Place Services at St. Helens Council with responsibility for major regeneration projects within the Borough and delivery of strategic infrastructure. I have 30 years’ experience within the public sector principally in property development, regeneration and infrastructure projects. 1.3 I have been involved in work on the feasibility and development of the Parkside Link Road on behalf of St Helens Council since September 2016. 1.4 My evidence addresses the history of the scheme; the Council’s promotion of the PLR; funding; and the present status of the project. 1.5 The evidence which I have prepared and provide for this public inquiry (References APP/H4315/V/20/3253230 and APP/H4315/V/20/3253232) in this proof of evidence is true and has been prepared and is given in accordance with guidance of my professional institution and I confirm the opinions expressed are my true and professional opinions. -
Adopted Waste Local Plan
Waste Local Plan Foreword 3 1. Table of Policies 4 Contents 2. List of Abbreviations 5 1. Introduction 7 1.1 Joint Waste Local Plan 7 2. Evidence Base 11 2.1 Portrait of Merseyside and Halton 11 2.2 Updating the Needs Assessment, Capacity Gaps 16 and Site Requirements 2.3 Summary of Needs Assessment 17 2.4 Implications : Sites requirements 26 3. Vision and Spatial Strategy 38 3.1 Vision 38 3.2 Spatial Strategy 43 4. Site Allocations to deliver capacity 47 requirements 4.1 Sub-Regional Sites 49 4.2 District-level Sites 51 4.3 Landfill Sites 53 4.4 Additional Sites 55 5. Development Management Policies 61 5.1 Protection of Existing Waste Management 61 Capacity for Built Facilities and Landfill 5.2 Waste Prevention and Resource Management 62 5.3 Design and Layout for New Development 64 5.4 Design and Operation of New Waste Management 65 Facilities 5.5 Sustainable Waste Transport 67 5.6 Criteria for Waste Management Development 69 5.7 Waste Management Applications on Unallocated 73 Sites 5.8 Energy from Waste 76 5.9 Development Management Policy for Landfill 78 5.10 Restoration and Aftercare 81 6. Implementation and Monitoring 83 6.1 Delivery Framework 83 Waste Local Plan Contents 6.2 Monitoring Framework 90 7. Glossary 95 8. Appendices 104 8.1 Appendix 1 : Waste Uses 105 8.2 Appendix 2 : Site Profiles 111 Waste Local Plan Foreword The Joint Merseyside and Halton Waste Local Plan (formerly Waste DPD) is the first Local Plan which has been successfully produced as a result of collaborative working between Halton, Knowsley, Liverpool, St. -
City of Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL REPORT OF INTERIM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT TO THE LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE DECEMBER 2020 13 JANUARY 2020 ALL WARDS AFFECTED Birmingham City Council hosted ENGLAND ILLEGAL MONEY LENDING TEAM 1. Summary 1.1 This report provides an update on the work of the England Illegal Money Lending Team (IMLT) hosted by Birmingham City Council’s, Regulation and Enforcement Division at 30 November 2020 2. Recommendation 2.1 That the report be noted. Contact Officer: Paul Lankester, Interim Assistant Director, Regulation and Enforcement Telephone: 0121 675 2495 Email: [email protected] Originating Officer: Tony Quigley, Head of Service 1 3. Background 3.1 The grant funded project was initially piloted in 2004 with teams from Birmingham and Glasgow operating across a specific region. The purpose was to identify if illegal money lending was in operation and, if so, investigate and institute proceedings against those involved. The project was commissioned for an initial period of two years. It was further extended year to year following a number of high profile successful investigations. 3.2 There is also a national team covering Scotland, Wales and teams covering Northern Ireland. All of the teams regurlarly hold meeting, currently virtual, to share best practice and current innitiatives. 3.3 The IMLT operates across the country using legislative powers under the Consumer Rights Act 2015. 3.4 The brief of the IMLT, from its inception, has been to investigate and prosecute illegal money lenders and to provide support to victims and communities under the control of illegal money lenders and by working with partner agencies to deliver this support. -
Liverpool City Region Combined Authority
FINAL DRAFT (NOVEMBER 2017) Liverpool City Region Combined Authority Rights of Way Improvement Plan 2018-2028 1 FINAL DRAFT (NOVEMBER 2017) Foreword by the Liverpool City Region Mayor Public rights of way are both a significant part of our heritage and a major recreational resource. They enable people to get away from roads used mainly by motor vehicles and enjoy the beauty and tranquillity of the countryside within a large area of the city region, to which they would not otherwise have access. In many areas, public rights of way help to boost tourism and contribute to rural economies. Public rights of way can also provide a convenient means of travelling, particularly for short journeys, in both rural and urban areas. They are important in the daily lives of many people who use them for fresh air and exercise on bicycle, foot or horse, to walk their dog, to improve their fitness, or to visit local shops and other facilities. I am therefore proud to present the first Liverpool City Region Public Rights of Way Improvement Plan which sets out a vision of how the Rights of Way Network can make a positive contribution to supporting the economic, social and cultural resurgence and ambition of the City Region by improving transport links and opening up a choice of travel to Liverpool City Region visitors and residents. It is therefore crucial to make sure that public rights of way continue and contribute to an environment that is accessible, efficient, safe and reliable and will provide a step change towards further sustainable growth.