BEHAVIOR PATTERNS and SEXUAL DIMORPHISM in the SPOTTED DRAGONET, DIPLOGRAMMUS Pauclradiatus (PISCES: CALLIONYMIDAE)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BEHAVIOR PATTERNS and SEXUAL DIMORPHISM in the SPOTTED DRAGONET, DIPLOGRAMMUS Pauclradiatus (PISCES: CALLIONYMIDAE) BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 60(3): 872-893, 1997 BEHAVIOR PATTERNS AND SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN THE SPOTTED DRAGONET, DIPLOGRAMMUS PAUClRADIATUS (PISCES: CALLIONYMIDAE) Michael E. Harrington ABSTRACT Dragonets (Pisces: Callionymidae) have long been recognized as exhibiting high degrees of sexual dimorphism. In the century following Darwin's (1896) suggestion that sexual di- morphism in Callionymus lyra has evolved through sexual selection, there has been no pub- lished research on sexual selection in any species of dragonet. The present study provides II detailed description of sexual dimorphism in the spotted dragonet, Diplogrammus paucira- diarus, as well as a description of the behavior patterns involved in courtship, spawning, and agonistic interactions. Observations in the field and laboratory revealed the conIext in which sexually dimorphic traits were expressed, thus providing a basis for future research on sexual selection. Like most dragonets, the males of D. pauciradiarus are larger than the females, and the former develop longer dorsal and caudal fins. Males can also develop black pigmen- tation on the lower jaw (mouth bar), a black bar across the eye (eye bar) and orange pig- mentation on the head. and all three pigment patterns are accentuated (if present) during courtship and agonistic encounters. Males are highly aggressive toward each other and form dominance hierarchies. During both courtship and agonistic encounters, males perfornl lateral displays that involve raising the first dorsal fin. Spawning occurs during the last 2 hours of light (dusk) and involves ascending into the water column to release pelagic eggs. Because the sexually dimorphic traits of the males are involved in both courtship and agonistic be- havior patterns. they may have evolved in response to either female mate choice, male-male competition, or a combination of both selective forces. Comparisons are made with other dragonets, though the behavior of most species remains unstudied. For at least 100 years, dragonets (Pisces: Callionymidae) have been noted for exhibiting high degrees of sexual dimorphism (Darwin, 1896), and it is often suggested that the differences between males and females of a species have evolved due to sexual selection. For example, Holt (1898) hypothesized that the sexually dimorphic characters in males of Callionymus lyra evolved through sex- ual selection via female choice. But in the century that followed, studies of sexual selection have been published for species in all the other groups mentioned by Darwin (except the Callionymidae), including cichlids, cottids, goldfish, pipefish, salmon, sharks, sticklebacks, swordtails, and wrasses. To study the possible selective pressures responsible for the evolution of sexual dimorphism in a species, one must first document the dimorphic characters and the behavior patterns in which the characters are expressed. Sexual dimorphism in the spotted dragonet, Diplogrammus pauciradiatus. and other species within the family Callionymidae, has been documented to some degree (Chang, 1951; Davis, 1966; Takita et al., 1983), but a more detailed description is needed to choose traits that likely influence the reproductive success of both males and females. In addition, little is known about the behavior of any dragonet species. Thus, it is essential to document behavior patterns (particularly those involved in aggression, courtship, and spawning) before attempting to study how sexually dimorphic traits and behavior patterns influence reproductive success in these animals. Thus, the formation of an ethogram for D. pauciradiatus is a necessary prerequisite to experiments on sexual selection. 872 HARRINGTON: D. PAUC1RAD1ATUS BEHAVIOR PATTERNS AND DIMORPHISM 873 The behavior patterns described in the ethogram are organized according to the scheme used by Myrberg (1972) with the following exception: color patterns are described in a separate section on sexual dimorphism. More recently published ethograms have additional designations of social vs. non-social behavior patterns (Clayton and Vaughan, 1988; Almada et al., 1990; Santos and Barreiros, 1993). This is a potentially misleading categorization, particularly for motor patterns that are used in both courtship and agonistic encounters (social by definition). Because males of D. pauciradiatus are not territorial and do not build nests, patterns such as staring are not included, though they may take on additional meaning when performed from a nest (Santos and Barreiros, 1993). Although quantitative analyses, such as sequential contiguity analysis (Myr- berg, 1972), were not carried out to confirm the groupings of motor patterns, many behaviors of importance to research on sexual selection (e.g., courtship) are highly ritualized and their occurrences are predictable. Aggressive encounters are more variable, but dominance relationships can be determined using simple be- haviors like chase, flee, and lateral display. Thus, the following ethogram will provide a sufficient basis for subsequent experiments on female mate choice and male-male competition in D. pauciradiatus (Harrington, 1996). MATERIALS AND METHODS Sexual Dimmphism.-Individuals were collected from sites in Biscayne Bay, Florida (Fig. I), during most months in 1993 and all months in 1994 (I.5-m-wide pushnet with 3-mm mesh). All fish were measured using either a ruler or dial calipers. Color patterns were observed in both the field and laboratory, and many individuals were observed in the laboratory while they were anesthetized with tricaine methane sulfonate (MS-222). The addition of MS-222 also enhanced the coloration of males with respect to mouth bar and orange head pigmentation (see Results), as both pigment types can fade when the fish are handled (i.e., stressed). A Wild dissecting microscope was used to observed the genital openings and other small structures (e.g., preopercular spines). Separate pushnet samples were obtained at site A (Fig. 1) during November, 1994, and September, 1995, and all dragonets collected were preserved in 70% Ethanol. The following data were obtained using dial calipers (nearest 0.1 mm): standard length as defined by Davis (1966), left pelvic fin-length (length of longest ray), first dorsal fin-length (length of longest spine), and caudal fin-length (length of longest ray). Pigmentation patterns were also recorded. Fin-length comparisons were made between males and females and between males with and without mouth bars and orange pigmentation. In each case, fin length was plotted against standard length, and a regression line was generated using Cricket Graph 1.2 on a Macintosh IIsi computer. Each pair of regression lines was first tested for differences in slope (0. = 0.05) using a two-tailed t test. If the slopes were not significantly different, the elevations were compared (0. = 0.05) in a second t test (Zar, 1984). Behavior Pattems.-Field observations were made using snorkel and SCUBA at site A (Fig. I), the time of day varying from early afternoon to dusk. Laboratory observations (over 200 h) were carried out on single- and mixed-sex colonies. The number of individuals in mixed-sex colonies ranged from 30 (15 males and 15 females) to 8 (2 males and 6 females). Fishes were housed in 400-800 liter aquaria (92-184 X 47 X 62 cm) with sandy substrate (3 cm deep) and plastic seagrass. Salinities were maintained at 34%0, temperatures ranged from 24° C to 27° C, and the tanks received fluorescent white light from 07:00 to 19:00. Colonies were observed during all hours of light. All colonies were fed frozen brine shrimp chopped into small pieces (single-edged razor blade) to facilitate feeding, es- pecially among the smaller females. Laboratory observations were supplemented with video tape recordings and 35-mm photography. These records allowed for more detailed analyses of behavior patterns in which rapid movements occurred (i.e.. lateral displays). Laboratory observations of spawning were confirmed by the collection of fertilized eggs in the aquaria. This was accomplished by passing a 30-cm2 net (500-f..Lmmesh) through the upper 30 cm of the water column 8-12 times. The contents were then transferred to a 1000-ml container of water from the same aquarium. Eggs were observed immediately, and larvae were observed on the following day. 874 BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE. VOL. 60. NO.3. 1997 3 KILOMETERS _ /"lVIRGINIA 1 ~ KBY N 4KBY BISCAYNE ~ ; SAFETY VALVE .. " f .. I n J 0 m BAY rf V '<:] 11 t} CD BLLIOT!' KEY !j . J f ~:~ Figure I. Collection sites for D. pauciradiatus in Biscayne Bay, Florida. Marked areas were sampled with a 1.5-m-wide pushnet (3-mm mesh). The highest densities of fish were collected at sites A and B. RESULTS Sexual Dimorphism.-More than 900 dragonets were collected over the course of the study, and the length-frequency distributions for males and females are shown in Figure 2. The maximum standard lengths were 43.0 mm (males) and 29.0 mm (females). The maximum lengths of the first dorsal fin were 74.1% (males) and 33.3% (females) of the standard length. The maximum lengths of the caudal fins were 56.0% (males) and 33.5% (females) of the standard length. Males (~ 9 mm SL) possess external genital papillae that are recognizable under a dissecting microscope. No such structure is present in females at any size. These results are summarized in Table 1. The overall mottled, sandy color of this species is not sexually dimorphic, but individuals altered their overall "darkness" on differently colored substrates HARRINGTON: D. PAUCIRADIATUS BEHAVIOR PATTERNS AND DIMORPHISM 875 70 60 I:J Males (n=596) • Females (n=316) 50 I-< QJ 1 40 Q '.5 30 o Eo-< 20 10 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 Standardlength(mnl) Figure 2. Length-frequency distributions for all males and females of D. pauciradiatus collected during the present study for laboratory observations or experimentation. Fishes were collected using a push net at the sites marked in Figure 1. All size classes from early juvenile (9-12 mm SL) to large adult (females: 24-29 mm SL; males: 37-43 mm SL) are represented.
Recommended publications
  • Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School November 2017 Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E. Hepner University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Other Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Hepner, Megan E., "Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7408 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary by Megan E. Hepner A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Marine Science with a concentration in Marine Resource Assessment College of Marine Science University of South Florida Major Professor: Frank Muller-Karger, Ph.D. Christopher Stallings, Ph.D. Steve Gittings, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 31st, 2017 Keywords: Species richness, biodiversity, functional diversity, species traits Copyright © 2017, Megan E. Hepner ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my major advisor, Dr. Frank Muller-Karger, who provided opportunities for me to strengthen my skills as a researcher on research cruises, dive surveys, and in the laboratory, and as a communicator through oral and presentations at conferences, and for encouraging my participation as a full team member in various meetings of the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON) and other science meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida, Caribbean, Bahamas by Paul Humann and Ned Deloach
    Changes in the 4th Edition of Reef Fish Identification - Florida, Caribbean, Bahamas by Paul Humann and Ned DeLoach Prepared by Paul Humann for members of Reef Environmental Education Foundation (REEF) This document summarizes the changes, updates, and new species presented in the 4th edition of Reef Fish Identification- Florida, Caribbean, and Bahamas by Paul Humann and Ned DeLoach (1st printing, released June 2014). This document was created as reference for REEF volunteer surveyors. Chapter 1 – no significant changes Chapter 2 - Silvery pg 64-5t – Redfin Needlefish – new species pg 68-9m – Ladyfish – new species pg 72-3m – Harvestfish – new species pg 72-3b – Longspine Porgy – new species pg74-5 – Silver Porgy & Spottail Pinfish – 2 additional pictures of young and more information on distinguishing between the two species pg 84-5b – Bigeye Mojarra – new species pgs 90-1 & 92-3t – Chubs new species – there are now 4 species of chub in the book – Topsail Chub and Brassy Chub are easily distinguishable. Brassy Chub is the updated ID of Yellow Chub. Bermuda Chub and Gray Chub are lumped due to difficulties in underwater ID (Gray Chub, K biggibus, replaced Yellow Chub in this lumping). Chapter 3 – Grunts & Snappers pg 106-7b and 108-9t – Boga and Bonnetmouth are both now in the Grunt Family (Haemulidae), the Bonnetmouth Family, Inermiidae, is no longer valid. Chapter 4 – Damselfish & Hamlets pgs 132-3 & 134-5 – Cocoa Damselfish and Beaugregory, new pictures and tips for distinguishing between the species pg 142m – Yellowtail Reeffish - new picture of older adult brown variation has been added, which looks of strikingly different from the younger adult pg 147-8b – Florida Barred Hamlet – new species (distinctive from regular Barred Hamlet) pg 153-4t – Tan Hamlet – official species has now been described (Hypoplectrus randallorum), differs from previously included “Tan Hypoplectrus sp.”.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume
    ISBN 0-9689167-4-x Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean (Davis Strait, Southern Greenland and Flemish Cap to Cape Hatteras) Volume One Acipenseriformes through Syngnathiformes Michael P. Fahay ii Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean iii Dedication This monograph is dedicated to those highly skilled larval fish illustrators whose talents and efforts have greatly facilitated the study of fish ontogeny. The works of many of those fine illustrators grace these pages. iv Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean v Preface The contents of this monograph are a revision and update of an earlier atlas describing the eggs and larvae of western Atlantic marine fishes occurring between the Scotian Shelf and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (Fahay, 1983). The three-fold increase in the total num- ber of species covered in the current compilation is the result of both a larger study area and a recent increase in published ontogenetic studies of fishes by many authors and students of the morphology of early stages of marine fishes. It is a tribute to the efforts of those authors that the ontogeny of greater than 70% of species known from the western North Atlantic Ocean is now well described. Michael Fahay 241 Sabino Road West Bath, Maine 04530 U.S.A. vi Acknowledgements I greatly appreciate the help provided by a number of very knowledgeable friends and colleagues dur- ing the preparation of this monograph. Jon Hare undertook a painstakingly critical review of the entire monograph, corrected omissions, inconsistencies, and errors of fact, and made suggestions which markedly improved its organization and presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Control of Meiobenthic Abundance by Macroepifauna in a Subtidal Muddy Habitat
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 65: 241-249, 1990 Published August 16 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. l Control of meiobenthic abundance by macroepifauna in a subtidal muddy habitat Emil 'Olafsson*,Colin G. Moore Department of Biological Sciences. Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh EH14 4AS. Scotland ABSTRACT: In order to assess the effects of macrofauna on meiofaunal community structure, field investigations were performed in a low energy subtidal muddy sediment in Loch Creran, a sea-loch on the west coast of Scotland. Meiofaunal colonization of azoic sediment in cages designed to exclude macrofauna to varylng degrees was studied. After 1 mo nematode density in all 15 cages was less than a third of ambient density. In none of the cages did the nematodes reach ambient densities within the experimental period. Copepods attained background levels in 3 mo in all cages and were in higher numbers in cages designed to exclude all macrofauna. Results indicate that small to medium sized macroepifauna control the densities of copepods at the study site. INTRODUCTION Apart from experiments conducted by Dauer et al. (1982) at a very shallow (1.5 m) sandy site, every preda- Although meiofauna used to be regarded as a trophic tor exclusion experiment dealing with meiofauna has dead end (McIntyre & Murison 1973), it is now acknow- been performed intertidally and often on sandy sub- ledged as an important food resource for higher trophic strata. In the intertidal zone abiotic factors such as levels. Meiofauna is preyed upon by the juveniles of a salinity, temperature and current are unstable and reg- large number of fish species (see Gee 1989 for review) ulate meiofaunal community structure to a great extent and other macrofaunal species including shrimps, (see for example Jansson 1968, Harrls 1972, Mielke crabs, polychaetes, and gastropods (Teal 1962, Bell & 1976, Coull et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee
    Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories Compiled by S. Oldfield Edited by D. Procter and L.V. Fleming ISBN: 1 86107 502 2 © Copyright Joint Nature Conservation Committee 1999 Illustrations and layout by Barry Larking Cover design Tracey Weeks Printed by CLE Citation. Procter, D., & Fleming, L.V., eds. 1999. Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Disclaimer: reference to legislation and convention texts in this document are correct to the best of our knowledge but must not be taken to infer definitive legal obligation. Cover photographs Front cover: Top right: Southern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome (Richard White/JNCC). The world’s largest concentrations of southern rockhopper penguin are found on the Falkland Islands. Centre left: Down Rope, Pitcairn Island, South Pacific (Deborah Procter/JNCC). The introduced rat population of Pitcairn Island has successfully been eradicated in a programme funded by the UK Government. Centre right: Male Anegada rock iguana Cyclura pinguis (Glen Gerber/FFI). The Anegada rock iguana has been the subject of a successful breeding and re-introduction programme funded by FCO and FFI in collaboration with the National Parks Trust of the British Virgin Islands. Back cover: Black-browed albatross Diomedea melanophris (Richard White/JNCC). Of the global breeding population of black-browed albatross, 80 % is found on the Falkland Islands and 10% on South Georgia. Background image on front and back cover: Shoal of fish (Charles Sheppard/Warwick
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Relative Abundance of Demersal Fishes from Beam Trawl
    CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT, FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE SCI ENCE SCIENCE SERIES TECHNICAL REPORT Number 124 Distribution and relative abundance of demersal fi shes from beam trawl surveys in the eastern English Channel (ICES division VIId) and the southern North Sea (ICES division IVc) 1993-2001 M. Parker-Humphreys LOWESTOFT 2005 1 This report should be cited as: Parker-Humphreys, M. (2005). Distribution and relative abundance of demersal fishes from beam trawl surveys in eastern English Channel (ICES division VIId) and the southern North Sea (ICES division IVc) 1993-2001. Sci. Ser. Tech Rep., CEFAS Lowestoft, 124: 92pp. © Crown copyright, 2005 This publication (excluding the logos) may be re-used free of charge in any format or medium for research for non-commercial purposes, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being re-used accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the publication specified. This publication is also available at www.cefas.co.uk For any other use of this material please apply for a Click-Use Licence for core material at www.hmso.gov.uk/ copyright/licences/core/core_licence.htm, or by writing to: HMSO’s Licensing Division St Clements House 2-16 Colegate Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax: 01603 723000 E-mail: [email protected] 2 CONTENTS ........................................................................................Page 1. Eastern English Channel Fisheries .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Bibliography of Diet Studies of Fish of the Southeast United States and Gray’S Reef National Marine Sanctuary
    Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series MSD-05-2 An annotated bibliography of diet studies of fish of the southeast United States and Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary U.S. Department of Commerce February 2005 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management Marine Sanctuaries Division About the Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Marine Sanctuary Division (MSD) administers the National Marine Sanctuary Program. Its mission is to identify, designate, protect and manage the ecological, recreational, research, educational, historical, and aesthetic resources and qualities of nationally significant coastal and marine areas. The existing marine sanctuaries differ widely in their natural and historical resources and include nearshore and open ocean areas ranging in size from less than one to over 5,000 square miles. Protected habitats include rocky coasts, kelp forests, coral reefs, sea grass beds, estuarine habitats, hard and soft bottom habitats, segments of whale migration routes, and shipwrecks. Because of considerable differences in settings, resources, and threats, each marine sanctuary has a tailored management plan. Conservation, education, research, monitoring and enforcement programs vary accordingly. The integration of these programs is fundamental to marine protected area management. The Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series reflects and supports this integration by providing a forum for publication and discussion of the complex issues currently facing the National Marine Sanctuary Program. Topics of published reports vary substantially and may include descriptions of educational programs, discussions on resource management issues, and results of scientific research and monitoring projects. The series facilitates integration of natural sciences, socioeconomic and cultural sciences, education, and policy development to accomplish the diverse needs of NOAA’s resource protection mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of North Sea Fishes
    ICES COOPERATIVE RESEARCH REPORT RAPPORT DES RECHERCHES COLLECTIVES NO. 194 Atlas of North Sea Fishes Based on bottom-trawl survey data for the years 1985—1987 Ruud J. Knijn1, Trevor W. Boon2, Henk J. L. Heessen1, and John R. G. Hislop3 'Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research, Haringkade 1, PO Box 6 8 , 1970 AB Umuiden, The Netherlands 2MAFF, Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 OHT, England 3Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, Victoria Road, Aberdeen AB9 8 DB, Scotland Fish illustrations by Peter Stebbing International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer Palægade 2—4, DK-1261 Copenhagen K, Denmark September 1993 Copyright ® 1993 All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by photostat or microfilm or stored in a storage system or retrieval system or by any other means without written permission from the authors and the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Illustrations ® 1993 Peter Stebbing Published with financial support from the Directorate-General for Fisheries, AIR Programme, of the Commission of the European Communities ICES Cooperative Research Report No. 194 Atlas of North Sea Fishes ISSN 1017-6195 Printed in Denmark Contents 1. Introduction............................................................................................................... 1 2. Recruit surveys.................................................................................. 3 2.1 General purpose of the surveys.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How to Train Your Dragonet (And Other Finicky Eaters)
    THIRD QUARTER 2017 I VOLUME 11 How to Train Your Dragonet (and other finicky eaters) Featured Tanks: SCHNITZELREEF and REEFSPOT Reef Hobbyist Magazine 1 THIRD QUARTER 2017 | Volume 11 FEATURES Copyright © 2017 Reef Hobbyist Magazine. All rights reserved. FOLLOWING THE DREAM: ANNOUNCEMENTS MY RISING TIDE • Care to share your reefing, fragging, breeding, or husbandry success with 6 INTERNSHIP the world? Email us your article ideas through the "Contact Us" tab on our Following his dream, Zachary Mueller was granted an website. internship with Rising Tide Conservation, one of the leading projects in captive marine fish breeding. Join RHM-SPONSORED EVENTS him as he shares his successes and failures in the Our latest issues are available at sponsored events. Contact us through our rigorous world of real science. website to have your event sponsored. COPEPODS FOR • MAMAX 2017: September 23, Chesapeake, VA EVERYONE: www.midatlanticmas.org/mamax-2017/ 10 CULTURING MADE EASY • Reef League: September 23, St. Augustine, FL Gordon Greenley is an accomplished marine aquarist www.reefleague.com and breeder specializing in rare invertebrates and • Reef-A-Palooza (Los Angeles): October 7-8, Anaheim, CA syngnathids. Feeding live copepods to reef tanks is www.reefapaloozashow.net highly nutritious and economical. Gordon details the • Southwest Florida MAS Reef Conference: October 21-22, Ft Meyers, FL culture requirements for two important species here. www.reefconference.com SCHNITZELREEF • Reef-A-Palooza (Orlando): April 7-8, 2018, Orlando, FL Nick Frick is a 10-year veteran reefer www.reefapaloozashow.net 16 better known online as Schnitzelreef. • Reef-A-Palooza (New York): June 23-24, 2018, Secaucus, NJ Nick's 8-foot reef tank is truly a showpiece of www.reefapaloozashow.net reefkeeping splendor, and hearing all that went into its creation is a great education in what it takes to DIGITAL & HARD COPY SUBSCRIPTIONS build a world-class reef.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fishes from Galicia (NW Spain): an Updated Checklist
    1 2 Marine fishes from Galicia (NW Spain): an updated checklist 3 4 5 RAFAEL BAÑON1, DAVID VILLEGAS-RÍOS2, ALBERTO SERRANO3, 6 GONZALO MUCIENTES2,4 & JUAN CARLOS ARRONTE3 7 8 9 10 1 Servizo de Planificación, Dirección Xeral de Recursos Mariños, Consellería de Pesca 11 e Asuntos Marítimos, Rúa do Valiño 63-65, 15703 Santiago de Compostela, Spain. E- 12 mail: [email protected] 13 2 CSIC. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas. Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo 14 (Pontevedra), Spain. E-mail: [email protected] (D. V-R); [email protected] 15 (G.M.). 16 3 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, C.O. de Santander, Santander, Spain. E-mail: 17 [email protected] (A.S); [email protected] (J.-C. A). 18 4Centro Tecnológico del Mar, CETMAR. Eduardo Cabello s.n., 36208. Vigo 19 (Pontevedra), Spain. 20 21 Abstract 22 23 An annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Galician waters is presented. The list 24 is based on historical literature records and new revisions. The ichthyofauna list is 25 composed by 397 species very diversified in 2 superclass, 3 class, 35 orders, 139 1 1 families and 288 genus. The order Perciformes is the most diverse one with 37 families, 2 91 genus and 135 species. Gobiidae (19 species) and Sparidae (19 species) are the 3 richest families. Biogeographically, the Lusitanian group includes 203 species (51.1%), 4 followed by 149 species of the Atlantic (37.5%), then 28 of the Boreal (7.1%), and 17 5 of the African (4.3%) groups. We have recognized 41 new records, and 3 other records 6 have been identified as doubtful.
    [Show full text]