DOCSLIB.ORG

Apis Mellifera 7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Apis Mellifera 7 Invite international cooperation and investors By Ir. Bambang Soekartiko Bina Apiary Indonesia Email : [email protected] INDONESIA GLOBAL Located between Asia and Australia continent – 200.000.000 ha land and 500.000.000 ha of sea. – 243.000.000 population ( No 4 after China, India, USA) – 120.000.000 ha of Tropical Rain Forest – Consist of 17.508 islands A potential country for bee products producers and consumers Beekeeping to make people healthy and wealthy 241 millions population, 4th after China, India and USA – 60 % in Java island – Many people living at isolated and remote area and small islands – Health problems : infection deseases – Honey bee products and Apitherapy best alternative to maintain healthy and wealthy for rural people Variety of Honey Bee in Indonesia 1. Apis dorsata 2. Apis andreniformis 3. Apis cerana Ada di Indonesia 4. Apis koschevnikovi 5. Apis nigrocincta 6. Apis mellifera 7. Apis nuluensis 8. Apis laboriosa 9. Apis florea Apis dorsata Apis cerana Apis mellifera - Traditional beekeeping Apis cerana have been practiced by rural people of Java and Bali long time ago using hollow logs and clay pots – Honey hunting of Apis dorsata in Natural forest at Sumatera, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, NTT, NTB, and Papua/Irian – Modern beekeeping Apis mellifera start in 1974 at Java island by small beekeepers Honey hunting of indigeneous species of Tropical Rain Forest Apis dorsata practice by people living surrounding forest at outer island of Java. – Nesting at big trees protecting by Law – Claims as individual ownership – The population decrease because of forest fire and illegal logging in Natural forest – The population increase at Industrial plantation forest of Acacia mangium and Euacalyptus sp and Palm Oil estate – Total population reported 160.000 colonies (National parks, Conservation forest, Protection forest, Concession and industrial plantation forest) NEST of Apis dorsata BandaBanda AcehAceh –– 19/02/2009 19/02/2009 PekanbaruPekanbaru –– 28/02/2009 28/02/2009 Traditional Beekeeping of Indigenous species Apis cerana indica practice by rural people at Java and Bali island – Culture in hollow logs or clay pots – Population decrease because of herbicide, pepicide and culture of youn people – Young people don’t like to become beekeepers – Potential income generation and health food for rural people. – Crops pollinator – Non migratory beekeeping because of coconut and fruit trees growh in every village Apis mellifera practiced as commercial beekeeping since 1974. Colonies impoted from Australia • Adopted in Java island for honey, bee pollen,royal jelly production and bee sting practice. Propolis not yet harvested • Population to day about 30,000 colonies • Own by small beekeepers. No big scale beekeeper • Migratory beekeeping in Java , Bali and NTB • Kapok (Ceiba petandra), rubber (Hivea brazilienzis), rambutan,lechi, manggo, coffea,durian (Durio zabethinus), Calliandra sp,, Dalbergia sp, Acacia auriculiformis, chest nut and corn (Zea mays) as main honey and pollen source Apis mellifera Honey harvesting at kapok randu Beekeeping at Rambutan garden Potential bee plantations • Natural forest : at National Parks, Logging Concessions, Protection Forest, Conservation forest • Mangrove forest along coastal area. The largest mangrove forest. Good resource of red propolis (Apimondia, Melbourne September 2007), • Plantation forest : pulp and paper industries at Sumatera and Kalimantan Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus sp • Estate plantation : rubber , coffea, chest nuts, kapok • Fruits garden : rambutan, manggo, durian,lechi, • Agriculture crops : Corn (Zea mays) WHY INTEGRATED BEEKEEPING DEVELOPMENT 1. Many bee plants : rubber estates, Acacia mangium estates, manggo, rambutan, are lack of pollen. So the huge honey resources cannot been harvested by Apis mellifera, unless there are pollen producer plantations (Sorghum sp) all over the year 2.Sorghum can grow easily and produce etanol, feed for cattle, fluor for food, and pollen for bees 3. Indonesia import oil, milk, meat, fluor and honey. 4. Integrated Beekeeping will help Indonesia self sufficient and stop import fuel, fluor, milk, meat and bee products. SORGHUM as Center of Integrated Beekeeping Development WHY , because : 1. Sorghum grow easily on all types of soil, elevation, climate as pioneer plantation 2. All parts of sorghum tree can be utilized : flower (bee), seed (food), stalk (etanol), leaf (cattle feed), or multi purpose plant 3. Harvest only 100 days , and the 2nd and 3rd crop grow without investment (3 time harvest) 4. Can be mixed or intercropping with Forest Trees plantation (Taungya system) or Agro Forestry INTEGRATEDINTEGRATED BEEBEE KEEPINGKEEPING DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT LAND PREPARATION SORGHUM PLANTS ARE GROWING (1 MONTH) IntegratedIntegrated BeeBee KeepingKeeping DevelopmentDevelopment ► 2 Sorghum ► 3 Bee products ► 1 Bees ► 7 Human health ► 4 Cattle food ► 5 Bio-Ethanol ► 6 Human food INTEGRATEDINTEGRATED BEEBEE KEEPINGKEEPING DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT FOOD – FEED – ENERGY – INDUSTRY 40-100 gr/stalk (4-5 ton/ha) Subtitute of wheat flour 33 kgkg (max. 40 %) + cattle feed Subtitute of rice (higher 3 kg seeds = 1 liter bioetanol protein content) + cattle feed 1 kg consentrate Bioethanol + cattle feed 200-400 gr/stalk (30-50 ton/ha) 2525 kgkg Bioethanol Cattle feed 1 kg = 650 ml sap (sugar 14 %) Fuel (bagasse) 350 gr bagasse 100-200 gr/btg (20-40 ton/ha) Cattle Feed INTEGRATEDINTEGRATED BEEBEE KEEPINGKEEPING DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT MILKMILK PRODUCTIONPRODUCTION MEATMEAT PRODUCTIONPRODUCTION INTEGRATEDINTEGRATED BEEBEE KEEPINGKEEPING DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT FFlowerFlowerlower forfor HHoneyHHoneyoneyoney BeeBee Fresh fruit, dried fruit, seed before and after peeling ECONOMIC ANALYSIS INTEGRATED BEE KEEPING DEVELOPMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Area of sorghum 106 HA106 HA BUSINESS UNIT PRODUCTSPRODUCTSPRODUCTS CAPASITYCAPASITYCAPASITY SELLING PRICESELLING PRICEPRODUCTION COST Sorghum Production Sorghum Flour 424 TON/YR $ 0.40 $ 0.24 Sorghum Stalks 8,100 TON/YR $ 0.01 $ - Bioethanol Production Bioetanol 95% 324,000 LTR/YR $ 0.75 $ 0.38 Feedlot Live Cows 1,089 COW/YR 511,830 KG/YR $ 2.40 $ 2.07 Bee Keeping Honey 4,000 KG/YR $ 2.50 $ 3.05 Pollen 360 KG/YR $ 7.50 $ 5.42 Royal Jelly 180 KG/YR $ 70.00 $ 7.22 PROJECT FINANCE NEEDS BUSINESS UNIT INVESTMENTINVESTMENTINVESTMENT WORKING CAPITAL PROVISION &IDC TOTALTOTALTOTAL Sorghum Production $ 131,663.50 $ 24,874.06 $ 18,944.96 $ 175,482.51 Bioethanol Production $ 256,725.00 $ 24,066.73 $ 36,695.62 $ 317,487.34 Feedlot $ 89,450.00 $ 352,154.50 $ 16,223.45 $ 457,827.95 Bee Keeping $ 17,405.00 $ 10,410.00 $ 2,575.61 $ 30,390.61 TOTALTOTALTOTAL $ 495,243.50 $ 411,505.28 $ 74,439.63 $ 981,188.41 PROJECT FINANCE Own Capital $ 74,439.63 8% Loan $ 906,748.78 92% TOTALTOTALTOTAL $ 981,188.41 100% SSELLELLSELL BUSINESS UNIT 201020102010 201120112011 201220122012 201320132013 201420142014 Sorghum Production $ 250,600.00 $ 250,600.00 $ 250,600.00 $ 250,600.00 $ 250,600.00 Bioethanol Production $ 243,000.00 $ 243,000.00 $ 243,000.00 $ 243,000.00 $ 243,000.00 Feedlot $ 1,228,392.00 $ 1,228,392.00 $ 1,228,392.00 $ 1,228,392.00 $ 1,228,392.00 Bee Keeping $ 15,300.00 $ 25,300.00 $ 25,300.00 $ 25,300.00 $ 25,300.00 Honey $ - $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Pollen $ 2,700.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 2,700.00 Royal Jelly $ 12,600.00 $ 12,600.00 $ 12,600.00 $ 12,600.00 $ 12,600.00 TOTALTOTALTOTAL $ 1,737,292.00 $ 1,747,292.00 $ 1,747,292.00 $ 1,747,292.00 $ 1,747,292.00 NET PROFIT BUSINESS UNIT 201020102010 201120112011 201220122012 201320132013 201420142014 Sorghum Production $ 52,954.42 $ 67,123.81 $ 67,123.81 $ 67,123.81 $ 67,123.81 Bioethanol Production $ 25,732.51 $ 25,732.51 $ 25,732.51 $ 25,732.51 $ 25,732.51 Feedlot $ 28,689.90 $ 28,689.90 $ 28,689.90 $ 28,689.90 $ 28,689.90 Bee Keeping $ (5,645.21) $ 3,266.09 $ 3,266.09 $ 3,266.09 $ 3,266.09 TOTALTOTALTOTAL $ 101,731.62 $ 124,812.31 $ 124,812.31 $ 124,812.31 $ 124,812.31 RRETURNETURN OF INVESTMENT PERIODE OF INVESTMENT 5 YEARS GRACE PERIODS 1 YEAR RATE OF INTEREST 13.20% BUSINESS UNITBUSINESS UNIT 201020102010 201120112011 201220122012 201320132013 201420142014 TOTALTOTALTOTAL Basic LoanBasicLoan $ 161,169.30 $ 157,767.10 $ 178,592.36 $ 202,166.55 $ 228,852.54 $ 928,547.85 Sorghum Production $ 45,859.39 $ 27,236.29 $ 30,831.49 $ 34,901.24 $ 39,508.20 $ 178,336.62 Bioethanol Production $ 43,158.60 $ 48,855.54 $ 55,304.47 $ 62,604.66 $ 70,868.47 $ 280,791.73 Feedlot $ 67,876.05 $ 76,835.68 $ 86,977.99 $ 98,459.09 $ 111,455.69 $ 441,604.50 Bee Keeping $ 4,275.26 $ 4,839.59 $ 5,478.42 $ 6,201.57 $ 7,020.17 $ 27,815.00 InterestInterestInterest $ 119,690.84 $ 101,293.97 $ 80,468.71 $ 56,894.52 $ 30,208.53 $ 388,556.57 Sorghum Production $ 20,662.96 $ 17,486.99 $ 13,891.80 $ 9,822.05 $ 5,215.08 $ 67,078.88 Bioethanol Production $ 37,064.51 $ 31,367.57 $ 24,918.64 $ 17,618.45 $ 9,354.64 $ 120,323.81 Feedlot $ 58,291.79 $ 49,332.16 $ 39,189.85 $ 27,708.75 $ 14,712.15 $ 189,234.70 Bee Keeping $ 3,671.58 $ 3,107.25 $ 2,468.42 $ 1,745.27 $ 926.66 $ 11,919.18 TOTALTOTALTOTAL $ 280,860.13 $ 259,061.07 $ 259,061.07 $ 259,061.07 $ 259,061.07 $ 1,317,104.42 PROJECT FEASIBILITIES BUSINESS UNIT BEPBEPBEP PBPPBPPBP IRRIRRIRR R/C RATIOR/C RATIO Sorghum Production 392 ton 1.24 YEARS 73% 2.44 Bioethanol Production 373,908 ltr 3.25 YEARS 36% 1.97 Feedlot 356,226 kg 2.22 YEARS 35% 1.16 Bee Keeping 2.85 YEARS 28% Honey - 30,467 kg 0.82 Pollen 1,598 kg 1.38 Royal Jelly 35 kg 9.69 Thank you for your attention.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ecology, Behaviour and Control of Apis Cerana with a Focus on Relevance to the Australian Incursion
    Insects 2013, 4, 558-592; doi:10.3390/insects4040558 OPEN ACCESS insects ISSN 2075-4450 www.mdpi.com/journal/insects/ Review Ecology, Behaviour and Control of Apis cerana with a Focus on Relevance to the Australian Incursion Anna H. Koetz Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, 21-23 Redden St., Portsmith, QLD 4870, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-419-726-698; Fax: +61-7-4057-3690 Received: 27 June 2013; in revised form: 13 September 2013 / Accepted: 24 September 2013 / Published: 21 October 2013 Abstract: Apis cerana Fabricius is endemic to most of Asia, where it has been used for honey production and pollination services for thousands of years. Since the 1980s, A. cerana has been introduced to areas outside its natural range (namely New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, and Australia), which sparked fears that it may become a pest species that could compete with, and negatively affect, native Australian fauna and flora, as well as commercially kept A. mellifera and commercial crops. This literature review is a response to these concerns and reviews what is known about the ecology and behaviour of A. cerana. Differences between temperate and tropical strains of A. cerana are reviewed, as are A. cerana pollination, competition between A. cerana and A. mellifera, and the impact and control strategies of introduced A. cerana, with a particular focus on gaps of current knowledge. Keywords: Apis cerana; Apis mellifera; incursion; pest species; Australia; pollination; competition; distribution; control 1. Introduction Apis cerana Fabricius (also known as the Asian honeybee, Asiatic bee, Asian hive bee, Indian honeybee, Indian bee, Chinese bee, Mee bee, Eastern honeybee, and Fly Bee) is endemic to most of Asia where it has been used for honey production and pollination services for thousands of years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution and Nest-Site Preference of Apis Dorsata Binghami at Maros Forest, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
    Journal of Insect Biodiversity 4(23): 1‐14, 2016 http://www.insectbiodiversity.org RESEARCH ARTICLE The distribution and nest-site preference of Apis dorsata binghami at Maros Forest, South Sulawesi, Indonesia Muhammad Teguh Nagir1 Tri Atmowidi1* Sih Kahono2 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Dramaga Campus, Bogor 16680, Indonesia. 2Zoology Division, Research Center for Biology-LIPI, Bogor 16911, Indonesia. *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract: The giant honey bee, Apis dorsata binghami is subspecies of Apis dorsata. This species of bee was only found in Sulawesi and its surrounding islands. This study is aimed to study the distribution and characteristics of nest and nesting trees, nesting behavior of Apis dorsata binghami in the forests of Maros, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. The distributions of nests were observed using a survey method to record the species and characteristics of nesting trees, as well as the conditions around the nest. Results showed that 102 nests (17 active nests, 85 abandoned combs) of A. d. binghami were found. We found 34 species belong to 27 genera in 17 families of plants as nesting sites of giant honey bee. The common tree species used as nesting sites were Ficus subulata (Moraceae), Adenanthera sp. (Fabaceae), Spondias pinnata (Anacardiaceae), Artocarpus sericoarpus (Moraceae), Alstonia scholaris (Apocynaceae), Knema cinerea (Myristicaceae), Litsea mappacea (Lauraceae), and Palaquium obovatum (Sapotaceae). The nests were found in 0-11 meters (11 nests), 11-20 meters (40 nests), and more than 21 meters (51 nests) from ground level. The nests of giant honey bee were found in sturdy and woody branches, hard to peel, the slope of the branches was <60°, and nests were protected by liane plants, foliage, or both them.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Effects of forest and cave proximity on fruit set of tree crops in tropical orchards in Southern Thailand Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9bv4z153 Journal Journal of Tropical Ecology, 32(4) ISSN 0266-4674 Authors Sritongchuay, T Kremen, C Bumrungsri, S Publication Date 2016-07-01 DOI 10.1017/S0266467416000353 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of Tropical Ecology http://journals.cambridge.org/TRO Additional services for Journal of Tropical Ecology: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Effects of forest and cave proximity on fruit set of tree crops in tropical orchards in Southern Thailand Tuanjit Sritongchuay, Claire Kremen and Sara Bumrungsri Journal of Tropical Ecology / Volume 32 / Issue 04 / July 2016, pp 269 - 279 DOI: 10.1017/S0266467416000353, Published online: 13 July 2016 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0266467416000353 How to cite this article: Tuanjit Sritongchuay, Claire Kremen and Sara Bumrungsri (2016). Effects of forest and cave proximity on fruit set of tree crops in tropical orchards in Southern Thailand. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 32, pp 269-279 doi:10.1017/ S0266467416000353 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/TRO, IP address: 136.152.209.123 on 10 Aug 2016 Journal of Tropical Ecology (2016) 32:269–279. © Cambridge University Press 2016
    [Show full text]
  • Top-Down Sequencing of Apis Dorsata Apamin by MALDI-TOF MS and Evidence of Its Inactivity Against Microorganisms
    Toxicon 71 (2013) 105–112 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Toxicon journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/toxicon Top-down sequencing of Apis dorsata apamin by MALDI-TOF MS and evidence of its inactivity against microorganisms D. Baracchi a,*, G. Mazza a, E. Michelucci b, G. Pieraccini b, S. Turillazzi a,b, G. Moneti b a Department of Biologia Evoluzionistica “Leo Pardi”, University of Firenze, Via Romana 17, 50125 Firenze, Italy b Mass Spectrometry Centre, University of Firenze, Viale G. Pieraccini 6, 50139 Firenze, Italy article info abstract Article history: Apis mellifera venom is one of the best characterized venoms among Hymenoptera, yet Received 13 March 2013 relatively little is known about venom belonging to other species in the genus Apis. Received in revised form 18 May 2013 Melittin, one of the most important bioactive peptides, has been isolated and characterized Accepted 22 May 2013 in A. mellifera, Apis cerana, Apis dorsata and Apis florea, while apamin has been only Available online 7 June 2013 characterized in A. mellifera and A. cerana. At present, no information is available about the sequence of A. dorsata apamin. Moreover, while the antiseptic properties of melittin and Keywords: MCD peptides are well documented, the antimicrobial activity of apamin has never been MALDI-TOF Venom tested. In the present study, we isolated and characterized apamin from the venom of the Honeybee giant honeybee A. dorsata. We tested the activity of apamin against bacteria and yeasts in a Antimicrobial peptides microbiological assay to gain a more complete understanding of the antimicrobial Peptide sequencing competence of the medium molecular weight venom fraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Manual for Rafter Beekeeping
    Training Manual The following document is intended to serve as a training manual and has been developed on the basis of related literature and the personal observations of the author. It aims to provide the essential requirements for the implementation of rafter beekeeping and presents guidelines for rafter construction and management as a means of sustainable harvesting. Nevertheless, it should not be considered as a substitute for practical training by an experienced rafter beekeeper, at least in the first stages of implementation. As is the case for any beekeeping activity, experience is a key factor for success. Eric Guerin Beekeeping consultant [email protected] December 2019 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 3 2. WHAT IS RAFTER BEEKEEPING? ................................................... 4 3. BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR RAFTERING ...................................... 6 3.1 Presence of bees in the environment ........................................................... 6 3.2 Lack of “natural” nesting sites ..................................................................... 6 3.3 Abundance of bee friendly floral resources ................................................. 7 3.4 A widely recognized tenure or ownership of the rafters by individuals enforced by community laws and culture .......................................................... 8 3.5 Clarity on the tenure and management of the land ...................................... 9 4. RAFTER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Distinctive Hydrocarbons Among Giant Honey Bees, the Apis Dorsata Group (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Da Carlson, Dw Roubik, K Milstrey
    Distinctive hydrocarbons among giant honey bees, the Apis dorsata group (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Da Carlson, Dw Roubik, K Milstrey To cite this version: Da Carlson, Dw Roubik, K Milstrey. Distinctive hydrocarbons among giant honey bees, the Apis dorsata group (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 1991, 22 (3), pp.169-181. hal- 00890905 HAL Id: hal-00890905 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00890905 Submitted on 1 Jan 1991 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Original article Distinctive hydrocarbons among giant honey bees, the Apis dorsata group (Hymenoptera: Apidae) DA Carlson DW Roubik K Milstrey 1 US Department of Agriculture, IAMARL, PO Box 14565, Gainesville, FL 32604, USA; 2 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, APDO 2072, Balboa, Panamá; 3 University of Florida, Department of Entomology and Nematology, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA (Received 10 April 1988; accepted 11 February 1991) Summary &mdash; Cuticular hydrocarbon pattern (CHP) analysis was performed on giant honey bees (the Apis dorsata group) including: 1), those occasionally given species status-Himalayan honey bees, Philippine honey bees, Sulawesi honey bees; 2), those separated since the Pleistocene- common A dorsata of the Indian and Asian lowlands and islands on the continental shelf (India and Sri Lanka, Thailand and Sumatra); and 3), giant honey bees of Borneo and Palawan, potential step- ping-stones to the Philippines and Sulawesi.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity in Traditional Techniques for Enticing Apis Dorsata Colonies in Indonesia
    DIVERSITY IN TRADITIONAL TECHNIQUES FOR ENTICING APIS DORSATA COLONIES IN INDONESIA Soesilawati Hadisoesilo Forest and Nature Conservation Research and Development Jl. Gunung Batu 5, Bogor, Indonesia Telp. 62-251-315-222, Fax. 62-251-325-111 [email protected] or [email protected] It is known that Indonesia has the most diverse honey bee species in the world. Apis dorsata or the giant honey bee is one of the seven indigenous honey bees of Indonesia. Although A. dorsata is the main honey producer in Indonesia, especially outside the island of Java, every attempt to manage this bee like the cavity-nesting honey bees always fails. However, in some parts of Indonesia, honey collectors have been practicing traditional techniques to entice A. dorsata colonies to artificial nesting sites. On the island of Belitung this technique is called “Sunggau”, in Lake Sentarum, West Kalimantan it is named “Tikung”, and in an area close to Poso Lake, Central Sulawesi, it is called “Tingku”. The principles of these three techniques are similar. The differences among them are the condition and the topography of the place where they are built, and the way they are erected. Sunggau are built in dry places with flat topography, Tikung are built in wetland areas, and Tingku are built in hilly areas. Sunggau are erected with the support of one or two poles or branches of a tree which act as poles, whereas Tikung are erected with the support of two branches of a tree. Tingku, on the other hand, are erected without any support but are inserted into slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Differentiation of the Giant Honey Bee (Apis Dorsata) in Thailand Analyzed by Mitochondrial Genes and Microsatellites
    Biochemical Genetics, Vol. 45, Nos. 3/4, April 2007 (C 2007) DOI: 10.1007/s10528-007-9079-9 Genetic Differentiation of the Giant Honey Bee (Apis dorsata) in Thailand Analyzed by Mitochondrial Genes and Microsatellites S. Insuan,1 S. Deowanish,2 S. Klinbunga,3,4 S. Sittipraneed,1,6 H. A. Sylvester,5 and S. Wongsiri2 Received 7 August 2006—Final 13 November 2006 Published online: 7 March 2007 Genetic diversity and population differentiation of the giant honey bee (Apis dor- sata) in Thailand were examined. Six PCR-RFLP mitotypes were generated from digestion of the COI-COII, Cytb-tRNAser, ATPase6-8, and lrRNA genes with Dra I and Hin fI. Low genetic diversity (h = 0.074, π = 0.032%) and a lack of genetic population differentiation between A. dorsata originating from geographically different regions were observed from mtDNA polymorphisms (P > 0.05). In con- trast, microsatellite (A14, A24, and A88) polymorphisms revealed a relatively high level of genetic diversity in A. dorsata (Ho = 0.68–0.74, average number of alleles per locus = 6.0–9.0). Both A24 and A88 indicated significant population differentiation between bees from the north-to-central region (north, northeast, and central regions), peninsular Thailand, and Samui Island. KEY WORDS: Apis dorsata; honey bee; genetic diversity; mtDNA; microsatellites. 1Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. 2Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. 3National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, National Science and Technology Development Agency, 113 Paholyothin Road, Klong 1, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand. 4Center of Excellence for Marine Biotechnology, Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites, Pathogens, and Pests of Honeybees in Asia Panuwan Chantawannakul, Lilia I
    Parasites, pathogens, and pests of honeybees in Asia Panuwan Chantawannakul, Lilia I. de Guzman, Jilian Li, Geoffrey R. Williams To cite this version: Panuwan Chantawannakul, Lilia I. de Guzman, Jilian Li, Geoffrey R. Williams. Parasites, pathogens, and pests of honeybees in Asia. Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2016, 47 (3), pp.301-324. 10.1007/s13592-015-0407-5. hal-01532338 HAL Id: hal-01532338 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01532338 Submitted on 2 Jun 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie (2016) 47:301–324 Review article * INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France, 2015 DOI: 10.1007/s13592-015-0407-5 Parasites, pathogens, and pests of honeybees in Asia 1 2 3 4,5 Panuwan CHANTAWANNAKUL , Lilia I. de GUZMAN , Jilian LI , Geoffrey R. WILLIAMS 1Bee Protection Laboratory (BeeP), Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand 2Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics and Physiology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Baton Rouge, LA 70820, USA 3Key Laboratory of Pollinating Insect Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100093, China 4Institute of Bee Health, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, 3003, Bern, Switzerland 5Agroscope, Swiss Bee Research Centre, 3003, Bern, Switzerland Received 20 May 2015 – Revised 7 October 2015 – Accepted 26 October 2015 Abstract – Asia is home to at least nine honeybee species, including the introduced Apis mellifera .Inadditionto A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Field-Based Quantitative Analysis of Sublethal Effects of Air Pollution on Pollinators
    A field-based quantitative analysis of sublethal effects of air pollution on pollinators Geetha G. Thimmegowdaa,1, Susan Mullenb, Katie Sottilareb, Ankit Sharmac, Saptashi Soham Mohantaa, Axel Brockmanna, Perundurai S. Dhandapanyc,d,e, and Shannon B. Olssona,1 aNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India 560065; bMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; cInstitute for Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Medicine (inStem), Bangalore, India 560065; dThe Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239; and eDepartment of Medicine and Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239 Edited by Gene E. Robinson, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved July 13, 2020 (received for review May 12, 2020) While the impact of air pollution on human health is well studied, enemies through direct impacts on sensory physiology and be- mechanistic impacts of air pollution on wild systems, including havior (14). For insects, air pollutants are likely to impact those providing essential ecosystem services, are largely un- olfactory-guided behavior strongly, as chemosensory information known, but directly impact our health and well-being. India is is used in almost every aspect of insect biology from locating the world’s largest fruit producer, second most populous country, food, mates, and host sites, to avoiding predators (15). For ex- and contains 9 of the world’s 10 most polluted cities. Here, we ample, the transport of chemical signals in the air used by pol- sampled Giant Asian honey bees, Apis dorsata, at locations with linators to locate flowers and other organisms may be hindered varying air pollution levels in Bangalore, India.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Sweeter Future
    Towards a sweeter future Conserving the giant Asian honey bee in Peninsular Malaysia TEXT BY THOMAS S. KRAFT, VIVEK V. VENKATARAMAN, GREEN JOHN CHAN & DR. M. NAZIP SURATMAN IMAGES BY VIVEK V. VENKATARAMAN & GREEN JOHN CHAN ACROSS SOUTHEAST Asia, the arrival of a giant Asian honey bee (Apis dorsata) colony near one’s home or garden is regarded as a good luck omen (Oldr d Nanork 2009). And for good reason: these iconic insects, which form conspicuous semi-circular nests on the undersides of tree branches or rock ledges, are respected for the important services they provide to both humans and local forest ecosystems. The relationship between humans and A. dorsata is ancient, dating back potentially more than 40,000 years (Crane 1999). Despite the prominence of these iconic insects in the Asian landscape and their profound biological and cultural significance, however, little is known about A. dorsata, including the conservation status of populations in Peninsular Malaysia and beyond. Although insects tend to receive less attention than charismatic megafauna such as hornbills or tigers, it is crucial that basic information on these small but vital pollinators is collected before it is too late. At home up high The global distribution of A. dorsata stretches from Indonesia in the southeast to western India and Pakistan in the northwest (Hepburn and Radloff 2011), with 28 Malaysian Naturalist 2006). In Peninsular Malaysia, A. dorsata can be easily distinguished from the other honey bee species present, which include A. cerana, A. koschevnikovi, A. florea, and A. andreniformis. Spanning one metre or more in length, the nests are covered by layers of worker bees, with the honey and brood (young developing bees) located beneath.
    [Show full text]
  • The Comb Structure of Apis Dorsata F. (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
    Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2014; 41(5.1) 1077 Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2014; 41(5.1) : 1077-1083 http://epg.science.cmu.ac.th/ejournal/ Contributed Paper The Comb Structure of Apis dorsata F. (Hymenoptera: Apidae): 3-dimensional Architecture and Resource Partitioning Ninat Buawangpong [a], Prakaimuk Saraithong [a], Kitiphong Khongphinitbunjong [a], Panuwan Chantawannakul [a]* and Michael Burgett [b] [a] Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200 Thailand. [b] Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA. *Author for correspondence; e-mail: [email protected] Received: 28 February 2013 Accepted: 6 September 2013 ABSTRACT The architecture of the comb structure of the giant honeybee Apis dorsata was examined, including cell sizes, comb area, comb volume, and gravimetric capacity. Regardless of comb area, the partitioning of comb between brood rearing and food storage centered around 83% of the comb surface being used for brood production. The potential gravimetric capacity of the total comb was variable displaying a range of 1–2 g per cm2 of comb surface. The largest comb examined would have had a hypothetical weight of ca. 17 kg, while the smallest comb ca. 2.0 kg. These calculations do not include the weight of adult bees. A large colony would possess as much as 8 kg of adult worker bees based on an average worker weight of 160 mg. Key words: Apis dorsata, comb structure, hexagon architecture, gravimetric capacity, comb partitioning 1. INTRODUCTION Apis dorsata F. is one of two species can be very large, with reported dimensions of Asian giant honeybees with a range of 1.5 m x 1 m [6], each colony relocation throughout the Indian subcontinent, therefore requires the construction of a new Southeast Asia and numerous southwestern nest comb which represents a major Pacific archipelagos [1].
    [Show full text]